Maintenance Phase – "The Food Babe" (Sept 25, 2025)

Main Theme

In this episode, Aubrey Gordon and Michael Hobbes dig into the rise and rhetoric of Vani Hari, also known as the "Food Babe," a social media influencer famous for food activism campaigns against major corporations. The hosts critically examine Hari's tactics, her origin story, signature campaigns (like the “yoga mat bread” controversy), and the broader impact of junk science and sensationalist wellness language in today’s media environment.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Who Is the Food Babe? (00:55–04:57)

• Background: Vani Hari, born in 1979 to Indian immigrant parents in Charlotte, NC. Her father was an engineering professor; her mother, a high school math teacher. She graduated in computer science from UNC Charlotte and worked in management consulting at Accenture before starting her wellness blog.

• Origin Story: Hari cites chronic health issues (eczema, asthma, stomach problems, allergies, and appendicitis at 23) as the catalyst for her wellness journey. She attributes her improvement to dietary changes, fueling her entry into public health advocacy.

  “She talks about getting sick, she talks about changing what she ate, and she talks about feeling better. And then she says, I started looking into nutrition.” — Aubrey (03:47)

• Critical Framing: The hosts note the familiar structure of internet wellness origin stories: vague illnesses, dietary cures, “doing your own research,” and certainty that personal experience translates to actionable public health claims.

  “She’s got a condition without sort of clear causes or clear treatments, which often sends people googling. And then Google gets you into the like, swim with dolphins to cure everything rabbit hole.” — Michael (04:59)

2. The Building Blocks of a Wellness Influencer (04:57–08:10)

• Self-Education by Internet: Hari’s “research” is critiqued as confirmation-seeking instead of exploration. She looks for why certain foods made her feel better, not for the nuances or broad context of existing research.

  “You’re gathering ammunition for something you already believe rather than doing like an open ended, like, oh, what does the science say about this?” — Michael (07:12)

• The Launch of ‘Food Babe’: She began blogging in 2011, quickly leaving her consulting job due to the blog’s popularity and revenue from ads, affiliate deals, and her Truvani protein powder line.

3. Early Blog Content & Major Gaffes (09:03–17:16)

• Plane Air Panic (09:32–11:29): Hari stated that plane air is concerning because it “isn't pure oxygen... it’s mixed with nitrogen,” misunderstanding basic atmospheric composition (air is naturally ~78% nitrogen).

• Microwaved Water Pseudoscience (13:06–17:16): Hari promoted claims from Masaru Emoto’s "The Hidden Messages in Water," suggesting microwaved water forms “evil” crystals. The hosts lampoon the pseudoscientific logic and note Emoto’s lack of credible credentials and his label as a “pseudoscience entrepreneur.”

  “He is a pseudoscience entrepreneur. One of his inventions is called the vibration O meter. Got his degree in alternative medicine from a disgraced and discredited institution that no longer exists.” — Aubrey (15:54)

• Response to Criticism: Hari often deflects errors as “nitpicking” from critics rather than owning basic factual mistakes, displaying reluctance to correct misinformation.

  “If they can’t just admit to a mistake and be like, yeah, that was really dumb... The fact that she can’t even admit, like, oh, they're nitpicking and finding all this garbage. But also, it wasn’t even... it wasn’t wrong. And also, I deleted it without saying anything. All of this stuff is just, like, weird.” — Michael (11:56)

4. Tactics of Influence and Blocking Critics (19:02–21:37)

• Growth through Campaigns: Hari gains visibility by launching high-profile petition campaigns against prominent food corporations (e.g., Kraft, Starbucks, Subway).

• Pattern of Blocking Dissent: Notoriously blocks critics and those questioning her credentials—sparking the creation of a 10,000+ member “Banned by Food Babe” Facebook group.

  “Although as someone who blocks extremely liberally, I’m inclined to like, slightly defend her on this.” — Michael (20:21)

5. Signature Campaigns & Sensational Claims

a. Kraft Mac and Cheese (“Yellow 5 & 6”) (21:41–28:44)

• Petitioning over Food Dyes: Hari's campaign targets artificial food colorings in Kraft Mac & Cheese, linking them to dangerous health effects like hyperactivity in children, ADHD, and even echoing the “Yellow 5 shrinks your balls” urban legend.

• Dissecting Research: Aubrey and Michael clarify the actual science: food dye fears (like ADHD links or carcinogenicity) are largely unsubstantiated, and the referenced rat studies use unrealistically high doses.

  “According to one scientist... a 60 pound child would have to eat eight bags of Skittles a day to get to harmful levels of red 40.” — Aubrey (28:25)

• EU vs US Food Regulations: The EU does use the same dyes as the US, but under different names (E numbers vs. “Red 40” etc.), debunking the myth that the US is an outlier in using these chemicals.

  “Every food coloring that is allowed in the US is used in the EU... They are just named differently.” — Aubrey (29:10)

b. Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Latte (31:03–34:14)

• No Pumpkin in Pumpkin Spice: Hari popularized the (non-)controversy that Starbucks pumpkin spice lattes contain no actual pumpkin—missing the point that “pumpkin spice” is a mixture of spices. Notably, Starbucks later added pumpkin to the ingredient list amid public furor.

• Caramel Color “Carcinogen” Panic: Criticized Starbucks for using Class 2B carcinogenic caramel coloring; chemist experts clarify that this designation means only “not proven safe beyond doubt,” not that it causes cancer.

  “Class 2B means that all possible carcinogenic effects haven’t been ruled out, but that it hasn’t been shown to cause a single case of cancer.” — Michael quoting chemist Yvette Dennis (34:14)

c. Subway “Yoga Mat Bread” (36:19–45:31)

• The Azodicarbonamide (ADA) Scare: Hari’s viral video accused Subway of making bread with a “yoga mat chemical” (ADA). Hosts clarify that ADA is a foaming agent harmless at consumer levels, its occupational danger (when inhaled as powder) doesn’t translate to dietary risk, and its use was part of a safer, phased replacement of another chemical.

  “She relies really heavily on this sort of proposed binary of like, chemical versus natural. Which is like, that doesn’t exist.” — Aubrey (40:49)

• Public Relations Outcomes: Subway (and others) quickly pivoted, either because of preexisting plans or respondent pressure. Hari takes full credit for “victories” regardless of timing or actual harm.

  “The issue is that she is doing a bunch of world building that is like they’re poisoning you, the food supply is out to get you... painting a much broader picture about like, most of the sources of your food are inherently suspect and are trying to hurt you.” — Aubrey (46:41)

6. Broader Impact of Wellness World-Building (45:51–52:22)

• Consequences: The hosts argue the problem isn’t always the direct result (e.g., dyes removed from Kraft), but how this constant alarmism undermines trust in science, regulation, and public institutions, contributing to a “low trust society.” Hari’s presence at RFK Jr’s confirmation hearing, and similar rhetoric, shows her alignment with broader anti-establishment, anti-science trends.

  “Instead of educating her followers on the actual problems in the food supply, she’s essentially like uneducating them and making them afraid of all these like, phantoms, rather than, like, things that we could actually be doing something about.” — Michael (47:18)

• Rhetorical Devices Inventory (49:32–52:22)

  • Anecdotes as Evidence
  • “Real” foods vs. “fake” foods
  • Nutritional nostalgia (“things were better before”)
  • Posing loaded questions (“What are they trying to hide?”)
  • Suggesting complexity is always sinister, never product of legitimate supply chain/industrial logistics.

  “With the rise of mobile influencers with, like, more and more sort of, like, algorithms tuned toward rage, bait and controversial shit, it means we’re just gonna keep seeing more and more and more of this stuff.” — Aubrey (51:30)

Notable Quotes & Moments

• On Wellness Research:

  “It’s the kind of Googling most of us do... you’re gathering ammunition for something you already believe.” — Michael (07:12)

• On Admitting Mistakes:

  “If they can’t just admit to a mistake... the fact that she can’t even admit, like, oh, they're nitpicking... and also I deleted it without saying anything. All of this stuff is just, like, weird.” — Michael (11:56)

• On Chemical Fear-mongering:

  “Almost everything in the natural world is also chemical. Has a chemical name. This is once again, I would say neophobia in sheep’s clothing.” — Aubrey (41:03)

• On Regulatory “Victories”:

  “Again, each of these campaigns, she gets what she wants. But often what she wants is not the full picture or not correct or whatever.” — Aubrey (32:38)

• On Rhetoric:

  “Her most common [defense] is by asserting that the scientist in question is a paid industry shill... or that she’s just ‘translating’ science for the people.” — Aubrey (19:11)

• On Broader Harm:

  “She’s doing a bunch of world building that is like they’re poisoning you, the food supply is out to get you...” — Aubrey (46:41)

Important Segment Timestamps

| Topic | Timestamp | |--------------------------------------|---------------| | Introducing Vani Hari | 00:55–04:57 | | Hari’s “Doing Her Own Research” | 07:04–08:10 | | Viral failures: Plane Air/Microwaves | 09:32–17:16 | | Public Critique & Blocking | 19:02–21:37 | | Kraft Food Dye Campaign | 21:41–28:44 | | Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Campaign | 31:03–34:14 | | Subway “Yoga Mat Bread” | 36:19–45:31 | | Misinformation’s Impact | 45:51–52:22 |

Conclusion

Aubrey and Michael close by diagnosing Hari’s success as representative of broader trends: exploiting anxiety about “chemicals,” dismissing scientific nuance, and narrating a continuous battle of “real” vs. “fake” foods, with little regard for actual public health risks or systemic food justice campaigns. They urge listeners to watch for the rhetorical red flags (anecdotes, natural/chemical binary, “what are they hiding?”) that mark manipulative wellness discourse, and to remember that complexity in food systems often reflects logistics and trade-offs—not conspiracy.

“If someone opens with, like, ‘I didn’t see this information, what are they trying to hide?’ it might be worth considering that that is a person who hasn’t done their due diligence or doesn’t understand what’s in front of them.” — Aubrey (51:30)

Tone:
Wry, skeptical, conversational.
Best For: Anyone interested in debunking wellness misinformation, understanding food scaremongering, or learning how health influencers use viral tactics (and why it matters).