Fallout from the Supreme Court's tariff decision

Summary

Marketplace Morning Report – Fallout from the Supreme Court's Tariff Decision

Date: February 23, 2026
Host: David Brancaccio
Theme: An in-depth look at the Supreme Court's major tariff ruling, its impact on U.S. trade policy, and a data-driven conversation about the fiscal contributions of immigrants.

---

Episode Overview

In this concise but information-packed episode, the Marketplace team breaks down the economic and geopolitical aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Trump administration’s sweeping tariffs. Through expert insights and international perspectives, the episode explains what tariffs remain, what changes are likely, and how global trading partners are reacting. The second segment delves into new research finding that immigrants overwhelmingly contribute positively to the U.S. Treasury, featuring an illuminating discussion with a co-author of the Cato Institute’s report.

---

Supreme Court Strikes Down Unilateral Tariffs (01:01–04:06)

Key Discussion Points

• The Ruling:
  The Supreme Court determined that the Trump administration lacked legal authority, under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), for imposing broad, unilateral, globally-applied tariffs.

• What’s Affected and What Remains:

  • The ruling invalidates major “on-a-whim” tariffs, particularly those applied without Congressional oversight.
  • Other tariff authorizations remain in force:
    • Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974): Allows tariffs in response to unfair trade practices, still active against China.
    • Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act of 1962): Permits tariffs on “national security” grounds, especially on aluminum, steel, car parts, copper, and lumber.

  Quote:

  "[T]here are other laws under which President Trump has tariffs. Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows tariffs in response to unfair trade practices still in place against China." — David Brancaccio quoting Michael Strain, 01:45

• Impact on Average Tariff Rates:

  • The average effective tariff rate on foreign imports dropped from ~16% to 9% after the ruling.
  • However, new Section 122 tariffs may raise rates back up, at least for the next 150 days, to approximately 13.7%.

  Quote:

  "[T]ariffs that have been in the news a lot that President Trump has put in place on a whim [...] have been removed, which reduced the average effective tariff rate on foreign imports from around 16% before the Supreme Court's decision down to 9%. But according to the Yale Budget Lab, President Trump’s new Section 122 tariffs ratchet that back up [...] to 13.7%." — Martha Gimbel via Mitchell Hartman, 02:32–02:58

Notable Moments & Quotes

• Potential for New Investigations:
  "There are still a number of active investigations on aircraft industry, machinery, medical equipment, wind turbines and drones, which could lead to additional tariffs." — Robert McClelland, 02:14–02:25

• Next Steps for Companies and Consumers:
  Companies and consumers may consider legal action to reclaim payments made under now-illegal tariffs.

---

Global Response: Allies and Adversaries React (03:18–04:06)

Key Discussion Points

• India:
  Delays its scheduled delegation to Washington to finalize an interim trade deal.

• European Union:
  Meeting to consider whether to freeze ratification of last year’s trade agreement with the U.S.

• China:
  Calls for the cancellation of all U.S. tariffs; underscores its view that a trade war is detrimental to all.

• United Kingdom:
  Having previously negotiated a 10% tariff deal, the UK could now face even higher tariffs.

  Quote:

  "China says it's making a full assessment and has called for all U.S. tariffs to be cancelled, adding that in its view, a trade war benefits no one." — Felicity Hanna, 03:53

---

Immigrants’ Fiscal Impact: New Report’s Findings (05:07–08:17)

Key Discussion Points

• The Cato Institute Study:
  Outlines that immigrants—across all economic strata—are a net positive to U.S. government finances.

• Headline Number:
  Immigrants have reduced the federal deficit by $14.5 trillion (real 2024 dollars) over the past 30 years.

  Quote:

  "The biggest finding is that immigrants have generated a cumulative 14 and a half trillion in real 20, $24 in deficit reductions over the last 30 years." — David Bier, 05:42

• Undocumented Immigrants:

  • Net benefit of $1.7 trillion, with most excluded from Social Security and Medicare but still paying taxes.
  • Many pay into federal and local tax systems without receiving associated benefits.

  Quote:

  "They are paying taxes, particularly at the state and local level. And even if we look at just federal income taxes, a majority of the illegal immigrant population is on the books. They are paying into that system, and then they're not drawing that benefit out later when they retire." — David Bier, 06:39

• Tax Contribution Despite Lower Wages:
  Immigrants’ high labor force participation and hours worked mean they pay more in taxes than their population share would suggest.

  Quote:

  "So even though they earn lower wages because they work so many more hours, they end up paying more in taxes than their share of the population would predict." — David Bier, 07:18

• Policy Implications:
  Stricter immigration controls risk worsening U.S. fiscal health due to a shrinking working-age population.

  Quote:

  "If we end up in a situation where we cut off immigration or our working age population would go into decline before our retiree population goes in decline. So it's an enormous problem. Immigration alone is not going to fix it, but it's certainly helping and pushing in the right direction." — David Bier, 07:53

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [01:01] – Supreme Court ruling on tariffs and breakdown of impacted policies
• [02:32] – Quantitative impact on average tariff rates; policy summary
• [03:18] – International responses (India, EU, China, UK)
• [05:07] – Cato Institute study: Overview and headline findings on immigration's fiscal impact
• [05:57] – Undocumented immigrants' unique contributions
• [07:18] – Analysis: Tax contributions exceed population share
• [07:53] – Broader fiscal implications for future immigration policy

---

Conclusion

This episode provides a fast-paced yet thorough analysis of the immediate and ongoing effects of the Supreme Court’s tariff decision on U.S. trade policy and global relationships. The Marketplace team then pivots to data-driven insights on immigration, revealing substantial, long-term fiscal benefits as documented by a surprising source—offering both economic context and timely policy perspective for listeners seeking to understand today's headline economic issues.

Transcript

[A]

The Jack Welch Management Institute at Strayer University helps you go from I know the way to I've arrived with our top 10 ranked online MBA. Gain skills you can learn today and apply tomorrow. Get ready to go from make it happen to made it happen and keep striving. Visit strayer.edu Jack Welchmba to learn more. Strayer University is certified to operate in Virginia by Chev and has many campuses including at 2121 15th Street north in Arlington, Virginia.

[B]

Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder With a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other, introducing Odoo, the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier from CRM, accounting, inventory, e commerce, and more. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. This is why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you try Odoo for [e-mail] that's o d o o.com a

[C]

new data driven analysis finds immigrants are a net positive for the US Treasury. I'm David Brancaccio in Los Angeles. First, we're coming up on 72 hours since the Supreme Court determined the Trump administration did not have legal authority for a sweeping package of tariffs. These were the ones imposed unilaterally and globally using the International Emergency Economic Powers act, or I ieepa. But this ruling does not apply to all import taxes, and the president at first said he'll now apply a 10% global tariff, then raised his number to 15%. Here's Marketplace's Mitchell Hartman.

[D]

Even though the administration's biggest bucket of import taxes has been thrown out, Michael Strain at the American Enterprise Institute says

[C]

there are other laws under which President Trump has tariffs. Section 301 of the Trade act of 1974 allows tariffs in response to unfair trade practices still in place against China.

[D]

And section 232 of the Trade Expansion act of 1962, tariffs on goods with

[C]

a national security justification really high on aluminum, car parts, steel, copper, lumber.

[D]

And, says Robert McClelland at the Urban Brookings Tax Policy center, there are still a number of active investigations on aircraft

[E]

industry, machinery, medical equipment, wind turbines and

[D]

drones, which could lead to additional tariffs. Summing it all up, Martha Gimbel at the Yale Budget Lab says some of

[A]

the tariffs that have been in the news a lot that President Trump has put in place on a whim, for lack of a better phrasing, have been

[D]

removed, which reduced the average effective tariff rate on foreign imports from around 16% before the Supreme Court's decision down to 9%. But according to the Yale Budget Lab, President Trump's new Section 122 tariffs ratchet that back up at least for the next 150 days, to 13.7%. I'm Mitchell Hartman for Marketplace.

[C]

Companies and consumers will have to figure out if they'll sue to get money back for money paid on tariffs deemed illegal, and US Trading partners around the world are also recalculating strategy. The BBC's Felicity Hanna has more.

[A]

India says it will now delay plans to send a delegation to Washington this week to finalise an interim trade deal, and the European Union meets today to decide whether to freeze its ratification of last year's trade deal with the us. China says it's making a full assessment and has called for all US tariffs to be cancelled, adding that in its view, a trade war benefits no one. Meanwhile, the UK, which previously negotiated a 10% tariff deal, may be one of the few major economies facing higher tariffs than before. I'm the BBC's Felicity Hannah for Marketplace.

[B]

This Marketplace podcast is supported by Fundrise. Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use one of the premier strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the Fundrise Income fund, which has more than $600 million invested and a 7.97% distribution rate. With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion dollar. Learn [e-mail] Marketplace the fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current distribution rate as of 12312025 carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other information can be found in the Income Funds [e-mail] Income this is a paid advertisement.

[C]

Immigrants to the United States of all economic classes collectively put more into the than they cost. Fewer immigrants, according to this new analysis, hurt the fiscal health of the US the source of this new study is notable the Cato Institute, a think tank that often aligns with conservative economic policies but has a consistently libertarian focus. A co author of the study is David Beer, director of Immigration Studies at cato. Good morning.

[E]

Thanks for having me on broad brush.

[C]

The presence of immigrants helps ease the federal budget deficit.

[E]

Absolutely. The biggest finding is that immigrants have generated a cumulative 14 and a half trillion in real 20, $24 in deficit reductions over the last 30 years.

[C]

Now, you know, immigrants is a huge class of people who moved here. What happens if the question is, do undocumented immigrants, people in the US without permission illegally, does that calculation hold up?

[E]

If you look at just their net benefit, it's about 1.7 trillion. And what's really going on there is that illegal immigrants are largely excluded from the biggest public benefits programs, and those are Social Security and Medicare.

[C]

And unless a person is being paid, quote, under the table, they may be paying into those systems.

[E]

Right. There are some people who just get paid under the table. They aren't paying in as much as a legal immigrant is, but they are paying taxes, particularly at the state and local level. And even if we look at just federal income taxes, a majority of the illegal immigrant population is on the books. They are paying into that system, and then they're not drawing that benefit out later when they retire.

[C]

David, help me understand. There was a, I remember a line in the report that if immigrant workers were earning lower wages, you know, per hour, they can still pay more in taxes than the average person.

[E]

Yeah. So even though they earn lower wages because they work so many more hours, they end up paying more in taxes than their share of the population would predict.

[C]

Now, I mean, I saw that line in the paper. Even by this conservative analysis, immigrants may have already prevented a fiscal crisis. Can we move that forward? Can we extrapolate from that finding that an America with stricter immigration policies, the ones now in place, does that suggest the fiscal health of the country will get worse?

[E]

Absolutely, yes. If we end up in a situation where we cut off immigration or our working age population would go into decline before our retiree population goes in decline. So it's an enormous problem. Immigration alone is not going to fix it, but it's certainly helping and pushing in the right direction.

[C]

David Beer, director of Immigration Studies at the Cato Institute. Thank you very much.

[E]

Thanks for having me on.

[C]

And in Los Angeles, I'm David Brancaccio. You're listening to the Marketplace Morning report from APM American Public Media.

[A]

What if the most romantic thing you could do is plan for the worst case scenario?

[B]

I think there's nothing more romantic than actually knowing and being prepared for the future. Why would you want to have a messy divorce? That's unromantic.

[A]

I'm Reema Khres, and this week on this is Uncomfortable. We're talking prenups, the myths that make them feel taboo. What they actually protect and the bigger questions they bring up about love and power.

[D]

Listen to this is Uncomfortable.

[A]

Wherever you get your podcasts.