Loading summary
LifeLock Advertiser
The new year brings new health goals and wealth goals. Protecting your identity is an important step. Your info is in endless places that could expose you to identity theft, leading to lost funds. LifeLock monitors millions of data points per second. If your identity is stolen, our restoration specialists will fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Resolve to make identity, health and wealth part of your New year's goals. With LifeLock, save up to 40% your first year. Visit LifeLock.com SpecialOffer Terms Apply.
Nancy Marshall Genzer
Maybe some good news for home buyers From Marketplace, I'm Nancy Marshall Genzer in for David Brancaccio. Will 2026 be the year that homes finally become more affordable? Tomorrow we get pending home sales for December. That'll tell us how many homes went under contract. And Zillow recently released a report with some potentially good news for prospective buyers. Their researchers say homes will become affordable in more metro areas by the end of this year. Marketplace's Carla Javier brings this look at affordability.
Carla Javier
To be clear, homes aren't suddenly becoming way more affordable for everyone, says Orfeh Divunguy at Zillow.
Eric Murray
It's gonna be a year of small wins, he says.
Carla Javier
There are three factors.
Eric Murray
Incomes have continued to increase. Mortgage rates have actually fallen relative to a year ago. And then the third factor is, of course, prices. Price growth has remained somewhat flat.
Carla Javier
He says that median income households buying today have to spend roughly a third of their income on mortgage payments, which.
Eric Murray
Is high, but it's actually the best it's been since August 2022.
Carla Javier
And Zillow forecasts that home buying in some areas could become even closer to affordable by the end of the year. Spending no more than 30% of income on home payments, including property taxes and insurance, is the affordability rule of thumb, says Eric Murray, BoJack at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Eric Murray
If you start spending more than 30% of your income on housing costs, then it means you're giving up something else.
Carla Javier
Fridgesica louts at the national association of Realtors affordability this year, I think it's a very mixed picture, she says. She'll be watching those all important mortgage interest rates, too. And if more inventory comes onto the market and brings prices down, I'm Carla Javier for Marketplace.
Nancy Marshall Genzer
The New York Stock Exchange is working on a new platform for digital trading that would allow investors to trade around the clock. The platform would be separate from the NYSE's current exchange, which operates only on weekdays. Later this week, the Federal Reserve's preferred measure of inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index, or pce, for November is is due to be released. It comes as the Federal Reserve prepares to meet for its next meeting on interest rates next week.
Fundrise Advertiser
This Marketplace podcast is supported by Fundrise. Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use one of the premier strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the Fundrise Income Fund, which has more than $600 million invested and a 7.97% distribution rate. With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion dollar. Learn more@fundrise.com marketplace. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current distribution rate as of 12312025 carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other information can be found in the Income Funds prospectus@fundrise.com Income this is a paid advertisement the Supreme Court.
Nancy Marshall Genzer
Will hear arguments tomorrow in the case around President Trump's bid to fire Federal Reserve governor Lis over mortgage fraud allegations. Cook denies any wrongdoing. She hasn't been charged with any crime. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is set to attend tomorrow's session. The question is, can a president remove a sitting Fed governor? For more, my colleague David Brancaccio spoke with Sarah Binder, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a professor of political science at George Washington University. Here's that conversation.
David Brancaccio
The Federal Reserve act says that presidents can only remove governors for cause. Now I know HR people around the country deal with for cause all the time. How do you understand that idea of firing for cause?
Sarah Binder
Well, when Congress writes that its point is that the President has to have an actual real non policy reason to dismiss an appointee, right? Negligence, inefficiency in office. Those phrases go. The President just doesn't have carte blanche to say I don't like you, I don't like your policy decisions. That's why Congress put that four cause phrase into many of the laws that set up these agencies.
David Brancaccio
I mean, regardless of what one's view is on the seriousness of the allegations against Lisa Cook, it is fact that they're not proven yet.
Sarah Binder
Correct. And I think it's important to keep in mind this isn't a case on the merits. It's not about whether or not there was mortgage fraud here. The key question is can the President remove Governor Cook while her case, her legal case works its way through the federal courts.
David Brancaccio
I mean, is it relevant that the court has, in previous case, allowed President Trump to remove members of various other federal agencies, that he does have latitude when we're not talking about the Fed, for sure.
Sarah Binder
And in fact, the Supreme Court has basically given carte blanche to President Trump to remove all these other officers that he has fired from various agencies. And in these other cases, the court has kind of left these little breadcrumbs. You know, they say there's something unique and different about the Federal Reserve. And they've sort of suggested we might treat the effort to remove a governor from the board of governors of the Fed. We might treat that action by the president differently.
David Brancaccio
I mean, if those breadcrumbs have led us astray here and the court were to side with the administration on this, I guess we live in a world where the Fed is closer to, I don't know, the National Security Council, where those members serve at the pleasure of the president. I mean, that idea will, I don't know, shake our central banking system.
Sarah Binder
Absolutely. And even though it's a narrow legal question, it has potentially explosive implications for how the Fed governors make their decisions, but also, more importantly, what markets think about the Fed and their commitment to low inflation. And that's why so many people are paying such attention.
David Brancaccio
Sarah Bender is at Brookings and George Washington University. Thank you so much.
Sarah Binder
Thanks for having me.
Nancy Marshall Genzer
Our producers are Emma Condon, Tamar Fagan, Ashley Rodriguez, Ariana Rosas and Erika Soderstrom. Our senior producer is Alex Schroeder. Our supervising senior producer is Meredith Garretson Morby. I'm Nancy Marshall Genzer with the Marketplace Morning Report. From APM American Public Media.
This Is Uncomfortable Host
This week on this Is Uncomfortable. We have two new episodes exploring our relationship with money and work. First up, we've all been told that money can't buy happiness. But also, I think I have a.
Carla Javier
Personal convulsion that happens inside of me. When people say, like, money doesn't make you happy. I'm like, oh, you've never been poor?
This Is Uncomfortable Host
And then, why? The job market these days can really shake your confidence. People who may have been looking for a job two years ago and were getting interviews, getting responses, are now confronting something totally different, which is that there's this sense that there's really not the kind of opportunity that there was before. Don't miss an episode. Listen to this Is Uncomfortable on your favorite podcast. APPLAUSE.
Date: January 20, 2026
Host: Nancy Marshall Genzer (in for David Brancaccio)
Key Segment Contributor: David Brancaccio
Main Interview Guest: Sarah Binder, Brookings Institution & George Washington University
This episode covers the latest economic and business news, focusing particularly on a landmark Supreme Court case that could redefine the independence of the Federal Reserve. The episode opens with cautious optimism about housing affordability, dives into news about market modernization and the upcoming Fed meeting, and culminates in an in-depth examination of whether a U.S. president can remove a Federal Reserve governor. The Supreme Court case involving President Trump's effort to dismiss Fed Governor Lisa Cook raises fundamental questions about the separation of politics from central banking.
[00:31–02:28]
Pending Home Sales Data and Zillow Forecasts:
Expert Analysis:
Housing Cost Burden:
Affordability Rule:
Uncertainty Remains:
[02:28–03:15]
NYSE 24/7 Digital Platform:
Upcoming Federal Reserve Meeting:
[04:16–07:43]
Background:
Legal Foundation:
Key Interview — David Brancaccio with Sarah Binder (Brookings/George Washington University):
“When Congress writes that, its point is that the President has to have an actual, real, non-policy reason to dismiss an appointee… The President just doesn’t have carte blanche to say, ‘I don’t like you, I don’t like your policy decisions.’ That’s why Congress put that for-cause phrase into many of the laws that set up these agencies.” (05:03)
“It’s not about whether or not there was mortgage fraud here. The key question is can the President remove Governor Cook while her case, her legal case works its way through the federal courts.” (05:44)
“In fact, the Supreme Court has basically given carte blanche to President Trump to remove all these other officers… And… they say there’s something unique and different about the Federal Reserve. ... We might treat that action by the president differently.” (06:20)
“Absolutely. …It has potentially explosive implications for how the Fed governors make their decisions, but also, more importantly, what markets think about the Fed and their commitment to low inflation. And that’s why so many people are paying such attention.” (07:16)
“It’s gonna be a year of small wins.”
— Orfeh Divunguy, Zillow (01:10)
“If you start spending more than 30% of your income on housing costs, then it means you’re giving up something else.”
— Eric Murray, UNC Chapel Hill (02:00)
“When Congress writes that, its point is that the President has to have an actual, real, non-policy reason to dismiss an appointee… The President just doesn’t have carte blanche to say, ‘I don’t like you, I don’t like your policy decisions.’”
— Sarah Binder (05:03)
“It’s not about whether or not there was mortgage fraud here. The key question is can the President remove Governor Cook while her legal case works its way through the federal courts.”
— Sarah Binder (05:44)
“If the court were to side with the administration…then the Fed is closer to…the National Security Council, where those members serve at the pleasure of the president. …That idea will, I don't know, shake our central banking system.”
— David Brancaccio (06:53)
“It has potentially explosive implications for how the Fed governors make their decisions, but also…what markets think about the Fed and their commitment to low inflation.”
— Sarah Binder (07:16)
This episode offers listeners a concise but comprehensive update on the U.S. economic landscape, with a special focus on the Supreme Court challenge that could transform the nature of central bank independence in America. Experts highlight nuanced progress in housing affordability (tempered by lingering challenges), highlight financial market modernization, and dissect high-stakes legal arguments around presidential power and the foundational principles underpinning federal institutions. The conversation around the Fed’s independence is particularly urgent, underscoring how legal details can have sweeping macroeconomic consequences.