The politicization of monetary policy

Summary

Marketplace Morning Report: "The Politicization of Monetary Policy"

Date: January 12, 2026
Host: Sabri Benishore (in for David Brancaccio)
Guests: Julia Coronado (Macro Policy Perspectives, UT Austin), Abraham Ravid (Yeshiva University)

---

Episode Overview

This episode centers on the DOJ's unprecedented investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, contextualizing its potential to politicize U.S. monetary policy and undermine the central bank's independence. The second segment shifts to the entertainment industry, dissecting the Warner Bros. acquisition battle and its implications for consumers, theaters, and competition in streaming vs. traditional media.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. DOJ’s Investigation of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell

• Backdrop: The DOJ is investigating Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, ostensibly regarding his congressional testimony about building renovations, with the Fed being subpoenaed. Chair Powell strongly responded with a video statement, affirming respect for law but warning of political overreach.

• Threats to Fed Independence:

  • Sabri Benishore recaps Powell's statement emphasizing the broader context:

    “No one, certainly not the chair of the Federal Reserve, is above the law. But this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure.” (A, 01:26)

  • Julia Coronado explains this is ultimately about whether the Fed will continue to set rates on evidence or bow to political pressure.

    “...this is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and the economy, or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure and intimidation.” (C, 01:47)

• Political Interference and Interest Rates:

  • Coronado highlights past politically-motivated moves (e.g., attempted firing of Governor Lisa Cook, pressures on Powell himself), suggesting these are motivated by frustration over the Fed’s reluctance to drastically cut rates despite high inflation.

    “They're about the president wanting interest rates to be lower to stimulate the economy. And the Fed has not been willing to do more than a few rate cuts because inflation is high. And that is a source of frustration for the president.” (C, 02:19)

• Market Reaction and Stakes:

  • Immediate market response: Stock markets dipped, Treasury yields rose slightly.
  • Coronado warns of escalating volatility if the Fed’s independence erodes, citing Senator Tillis’s opposition to moving forward with any Fed nominations if this lawsuit continues.

    “...we could see further market reaction and volatility” if no one draws "a line in the sand" on Fed independence. (C, 03:19)

---

2. The Battle Over Warner Brothers: Streaming vs. Studio Ownership

• Who Will Acquire Warner Bros.?

  • Sabri Benishore turns to Abraham Ravid regarding the competition between Netflix and Paramount for Warner Bros. (B, 04:03)

• Viewing Habits – The Decline of Theaters:

  • Ravid shares personal habits:

    "I go to the movies if there are special occasions like the festival, meeting with directors. Otherwise, I only watch streaming." (D, 04:36)

  • Cites convenience and home tech:

    "...I have a very nice screen at home and a projector. So I basically do, you know, what I need to do." (D, 04:50)

• Potential Outcomes for Viewers:

  • Ravid suggests a Paramount-Warner merger might be "slightly better for viewers" than a Netflix acquisition, since vertical integration (a Netflix core strategy) tends to limit consumer choice.

    “All in all, vertical integration is not very good for consumers and generally not very good for companies unless there is no competition.” (D, 05:17)

• Vertical Integration and Consumer Impact:

  • "If there is vertical integration, you know, they could just shut out the competition." (D, 05:48)

• Impact on Theatrical Releases:

  • Will Netflix support in-theater debuts the way Paramount might? Uncertain, as streaming-first business models increasingly shrink “theatrical windows.”

    “They claim they do. They will have to send movies to theaters for at least a week if they wanted to. Being the Academy Award. Although the Academy might change the rules, it's not clear that they will not shrink the window further.” (D, 06:26)

• Industry Trends – A Decline in Moviegoing:

  • Ravid offers a striking statistic:

    “So if you look at the number of theater goers per population at the height … 2003 … each American bought about 5.2 tickets. Last year it was 2.2.” (D, 06:52)

  • Adds:

    “And it just continues to slide.” (D, 07:22)

---

Notable Quotes

• Jerome Powell (via audio, relayed by Benishore) — 01:26:

  “No one, certainly not the chair of the Federal Reserve, is above the law. But this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure.”

• Julia Coronado — 01:47:

  “This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and the economy, or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure and intimidation. An extraordinary statement coming from the chair of the Federal Reserve.”

• Abraham Ravid — 05:17:

  “All in all, vertical integration is not very good for consumers and generally not very good for companies unless there is no competition.”

• Abraham Ravid — 06:52:

  “If you look at the number of theater goers per population at the height of the number of tickets that were sold, which was 2003, on average, each American bought about 5.2 tickets. Last year it was 2.2.”

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• 00:51 – DOJ initiates investigation into Fed Chair Powell
• 01:26 – Powell’s statement on rule of law and political context
• 01:47 – Julia Coronado: The battle for Fed independence
• 02:19–03:19 – Political motivation behind Fed pressures
• 03:35 – Outlook: Market implications, Senate Banking Committee opposition
• 04:03 – Segment shift: Warner Bros. acquisition battle
• 04:36–05:03 – Abraham Ravid on moviegoing habits
• 05:17–05:48 – Paramount vs. Netflix acquisition: Consumer outcomes
• 06:26–07:22 – Shrinking theatrical window, impact on theaters, and decline in moviegoing

---

Memorable Moments

• Julia Coronado contextualizing Powell’s statement as “extraordinary” for a Fed Chair (01:47)
• Abraham Ravid’s revealing statistic about the sharp drop in theater visits (06:52)
• Candid, relatable discussion about preferring home streaming over going to the movies (04:50)

---

Tone: The tone is urgent, analytical, and accessible, moving from high-stakes national policy to relatable cultural shifts in entertainment consumption.

---

Summary for the Uninitiated:
This episode succinctly captures a grave warning to American governance: when central bank independence is threatened by political interests, financial stability and evidence-based policymaking are at risk. It then pivots to spotlight how the consolidation of media giants could further tip the scales away from consumer choice, with lasting consequences for both the big screen and home streaming.

Transcript

[A]

This Marketplace podcast is supported by Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort. Journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service, destination focused dining and cultural enrichment on board and on shore. And every Viking voyage is all inclusive with no children and no casinos. Discover [e-mail] Sling is the live TV service that puts you in charge. Choose your plan Orange for sports and entertainment favorites, blue for news and reality. Select for the essentials only pay for the stuff you actually watch and pause your subscription anytime because paying for TV or not watching, that's just rude. No long term contracts, no nonsense. Pick your plan, add what you want. Sling lets you do that. Visit sling.com to learn more.

[B]

The Justice Department Is Going after the Federal Reserve From Marketplace, I'm Sabri Benishore, in for David Brancaccio. The Justice Department is investigating Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, allegedly over his testimony to Congress around building renovations. Chair Powell offered a forceful video response on Sunday after revealing the Fed had been subpoenaed. Let's bring in Julia Coronado for more. She's founder and president of Macro Policy Perspectives and a professor at UT Austin. Hi Julia.

[C]

Good morning.

[B]

So here's some of what Chair Jerome Powell had to say on Sunday.

[A]

I have deep respect for the rule of law and for accountability in our democracy. No one, certainly not the chair of the Federal Reserve, is above the law. But this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure.

[B]

Yeah. So what is that broader context? What is this ultimately about?

[C]

Well, he went on to say that this is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on on evidence and the economy, or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure and intimidation. An extraordinary statement coming from the chair of the Federal Reserve.

[B]

What did you think when you saw this headline?

[C]

I was glad to see the statement from Chair Powell immediately after I saw the first headline. I think it's appropriate at this stage for the Federal Reserve to acknowledge that a sequence of events, including the attempted firing of Governor Lisa Cook and previous attempts to pressure Chair Powell to leave, are politically motivated. They're about the president wanting interest rates to be lower to stimulate the economy. And the Fed has not been willing to do more than a few rate cuts because inflation is high. And that is a source of frustration for the president.

[B]

Markets moved down on this news. Treasury yields went up slightly. At what point does this battle over Fed independence translate into a real financial market reaction?

[C]

Well, it depends on on where we go from here we did already hear from Republican Senator Tillis, who's on the Senate Banking Committee, that he was not pleased with this and would hold up any Fed nominations, including Chair Powell's replacement, if this lawsuit goes forward. And we will need to see some indication that there is a line in the sand when it comes to the independence of the Fed. Otherwise, you know, we could see further market reaction and volatility.

[B]

Julia Coronado, founder and president of Macro Policy Perspectives, thank you, as always.

[C]

My pleasure.

[B]

The battle rages on over who will buy Warner Brothers and all the movie studios and news network and streaming services it owns. Will it be Netflix or will it be Paramount? And whoever wins, what will it mean for us, the viewer? We put that question to Abraham Ravid. He's a finance professor at Yeshiva University who's done a lifetime of research into the entertainment business. We caught up with them at a movie theater on Manhattan's Upper west side. So, you know, we're here in the. Inside the theater. You can smell the popcorn. When was the last time. Do you. Do you go to the movies? When was the last time you went to one?

[D]

I go to the movies if there are special occasions like the festival, meeting with directors. Otherwise, I only watch streaming.

[B]

Really? Really. Why is that?

[D]

Well, because, you know, getting here today, it's a lot more complicated and I have a very nice screen at home and a projector. So I basically do, you know, what I need to do.

[B]

We don't know who's going to win this fight over Warner Brothers. Whether it's going to be Paramount, the old school media company, or Netflix, the streamer, what difference would it make to viewers who wins?

[D]

So it seems to me it would be slightly better for viewers if Paramount and Warner merge. I mean, Netflix idea is to be the first in streaming and then they want to vertically integrate. All in all, Vertigo integration is not very good for consumers and generally not very good for companies unless there is no competition.

[B]

Why is that?

[D]

Because you, as a consumer, you would like to see whatever movie you want. And if there is vertical integration, you know, they could just shut out the competition.

[B]

We're actually standing right in front of a giant SpongeBob SquarePants movie ad. And over there, there's Zootopia 2. These movies are here in theaters. Netflix movies do not usually come through theaters, at least not for very long. Will it want to send Warner Brothers movies into theaters as often or for as long as Paramount might?

[D]

They claim they do. They will have to send movies to theaters for at least a week if they wanted to. Being the Academy Award. Although the Academy might change the rules, it's not clear that they will not shrink the window further. Over the last 10 years, the theatrical window has been shrinking.

[B]

This has got to be a concern for theaters like this one or smaller theaters, too, I imagine.

[D]

Yes, I think theaters should be concerned. Regardless of this, I want to give you one number which I think is really tells the story. So if you look at the number of theater goers per population at the height of the number of tickets that were sold, which was 2003, on average, each American bought about 5.2 tickets. Last year it was 2.2.

[B]

Oh, wow.

[D]

So. And it just continues to slide.

[B]

That's Abraham Ravid there of Yeshiva University speaking with us about the fate of Warner Bros. Discovery in New York, I'm Sabri Benishore with the Marketplace morning report from American Public Media.

[A]

Hey, everybody, it's Kyle Rysdal, the host of Marketplace. It has been a year since the fires here in Los Angeles and businesses that burned are still struggling.

[D]

I won't lie. I've looked. I've looked at, hey, maybe we move the store. It wouldn't be the same hardware store.

[B]

On the ground reporting and what the.

[A]

Year ahead has in store for business owners still recovering. Listen to Marketplace on your favorite podcast.

[B]

Applause.