
Loading summary
Narrator/Announcer
This Marketplace podcast is supported by the Freedom From Religion Foundation. America is an aspirational idea, one we're still working to fulfill, shaped by enlightenment ideals, reason, liberty and freedom of conscience, the belief that power comes from we the people, not a divinely appointed ruler. And while these ideals have not yet been fully perfected, they created something powerful, a framework that has expanded rights and freedoms over time. Now those freedoms and your rights are under attack. We're seeing growing efforts to blur the line between church and state, public funds to promote religion, Ten Commandments and Clause classrooms, and pushing a version of America that leaves out too many people. As our Nation approaches its 250th anniversary, the Freedom From Religion foundation is working to protect the Constitution, defend secular government, and ensure that freedom continues to expand for everyone. Because America isn't just where we started, it's what we choose next. Go to FFRF US America or text America to 51151 1America to 511511 Text
Marketplace Host
fees may apply for a limited time. You can support the Marketplace Morning Report and receive the new Liquid Assets Nalgene water bottle for just $5 a month. Normally it's $7 a month, but more importantly, your support powers, clarity and context on the economic stories that affect us all help make this reporting accessible for everybody. Donate now@marketplace.org or click the link in the Show Notes
Nancy Marshall Genser
why Prediction Markets Are a Horse of a Different Color from Marketplace I'm Nancy Marshall Genser in Washington. Tomorrow is the Preakness Stakes, the second event in the Triple Crown. Americans have been able to bet on horse racing longer than any other sport, but interest has waned in the past couple decades. Betting on racing is down by more than 50%. You might think prediction markets would see this as fertile ground, but even though sports betting on platforms like Kalshee and Polymarket is surging, they have not made inroads in horse racing. Marketplace's Caitlin Tan did some digging into why.
Pat Cummings
Pat Cummings remembers his favorite Preakness race,
Race Announcer
Smarty Jones, winning in 2004.
Marshall Graham
And they're off. Smarty Jones gets off to a good beginning.
Race Announcer
I grew up in Philadelphia and it was just such incredible because the Philadelphia horse had won it side he's going
Marshall Graham
to win by a colossal margin.
Nancy Marshall Genser
Here is Smarty Jones.
Pat Cummings
Cummings is with the National Thoroughbred Alliance. He bets on horses all the time. So does John Stetton.
John Stetton
My mom was at the racetrack the day before I was born and at the racetrack about four or five days after I was born. With me and a stroller.
Pat Cummings
Back then you bet in person. Now. You don't have to be at the track. You can bet online, but all through platforms okayed by the racing industry. And that doesn't include prediction markets.
John Stetton
For the industry. It's better to lock them out and just keep all the money for themselves and restrict where I wager.
Pat Cummings
Racetracks and horsemen control their product the race because of a 1978 federal commerce
Marshall Graham
law that still could face legal tests. But for now, the prediction markets haven't gone that route.
Pat Cummings
Marshall Graham is a Rhodes College Economics professor and horse breeder. He's a and he's looking to tomorrow's lineup.
Marshall Graham
Since I'm on the spot here, let's see. I will go with the hell we did. It'll be my long shot pick.
Pat Cummings
But for now that bet's not likely on Kalshee or Polymarket. I'm Caitlin Tan for Marketplace.
Nancy Marshall Genser
Jerome Powell's term as chair of the Federal Reserve comes to an end today. Kevin Warsh will be sworn in to succeed him. Powell is set to continue on as a member of the Fed Board of Governors. For now, he said he'll stay on to see through the end of the Trump administration's investig investigation of the remodeling of Fed headquarters.
Race Announcer
Dell PCs with Intel inside are built for the moments that matter, for the moment you plan and the ones you don't. Built for the busy days that turn into all night study sessions. The moment you're working from a cafe and realize every outlet's taken, the times you're deep in your flow and the absolute last thing you need is an auto update throwing off your momentum. That's why Dell builds tech that adapts to the way you actually work. Built with long lasting battery so you're not scrambling for the closest outlet and built in intelligence that makes updates around your schedule, not in the middle of it. They don't build tech for tech's sake, they built it for you. Find technology built for the way you work@dell.com DellPCS built for you.
Sponsor Voice
The Marketplace Morning Report podcast is supported by three Day Blinds. We shop for everything at home now. Why can't we shop for blinds at home too? We can now with three Day Blinds. Instead of wandering around a store, three Day Blinds sends a professional design consultant straight to you. They bring all the samples, help you see what actually works in your space, take expert measurements and even handle the installation. We've all bought something that looked great in store and terrible once we got it home. With three Day Blinds you see everything in your actual light with your actual Furniture before you commit. Plus, whether you're at home or away, you can control your window treatments with the three day Blinds app. So for a free no charge and no obligation consultation, head to three day blinds.com morning for our buy one, get one 50% off deal. That's the number three D A Y blinds.com morning.
Nancy Marshall Genser
President Trump is requesting one and a half trillion dollars for the Pentagon next year. That's about a 40% increase from the current fiscal year. Of course, Congress will have the final say here. Lobbyists are chiming in, too. In fact, lobbying by the defense sector increased 10% in just the first quarter of this year compared to the same time last year. That's according to Open Secrets, a nonprofit that tracks money in politics. Joining us now is Dan Aubel, a senior researcher at Open Secrets. Good morning.
Sponsor Voice
Good morning.
Nancy Marshall Genser
We saw the biggest spike this century in lobbying by the defense industry in 2025. That is, according to Open Secrets data. So how much of an increase are we talking about here?
Marshall Graham
Well, they increase their spending every year, really, Especially in the last five years. But last year we saw a 24% jump in spending. So they are now spending over $50 million every three months.
Nancy Marshall Genser
Wow. So who's doing the most lobbying here and who are they lobbying, Dan? Is it members of Congress? The Trump administration? All of the above?
Marshall Graham
All of the above, really? There are both large and small companies doing the lobbying. The majority of the money is spent by the big five prime contractors such as Lockheed Martin and rtx, which used to be called Raytheon. Lockheed Martin, in particular, spent $15 million in 2025 and has already spent more than 4 million in the first quarter of 2026.
Nancy Marshall Genser
A lot of money. So why has lobbying increased so much by these military contractors? Is it just that they see how much President Trump wants to increase military spending and they want to be sure they get their piece of the pie?
Marshall Graham
That is generally a strong motivator for lobbying. The defense industry has an appropriations bill that comes up every year and is huge now, over a trillion dollars. And in addition to that, we are now in a more warlike posture. So a lot of these companies are lobbying to get their piece of renewing the stockpiles of arms that are being used. For instance, they will specifically mention weapons programs that are important to them, as well as advocating for easier ways to sell military equipment and services and weapons abroad.
Nancy Marshall Genser
So is all this paying off? I mean, is it becoming easier for these companies to sell weapons abroad? Did the companies that lobbied the most last year get the biggest contracts this year. Is there a correlation?
Marshall Graham
The industry is very top heavy with those really big manufacturers and contractors spending most of the lobbying money. So for instance, the top 10 lobby spenders made up 40% of the total defense industry lobbying effort in 2025. In fact, when you look at their lobbying numbers, compared to some other industries like pharmaceuticals, which spends the most, they almost seem small. But they did spend almost $200 million last year, which is a substantial amount to get their foot in the door. And that defense budget is now proposed to be a trillion and a half dollars. So they are clearly getting more than their money's worth. They have increased spending every year for the last five years, so there is evidence that they feel the same.
Nancy Marshall Genser
Dan Aubol is a senior researcher at Open Secrets. Thank you so much.
Marshall Graham
Thank you for having me.
Nancy Marshall Genser
In Washington, I'm Nancy Marshall Genzer with the Marketplace Morning Report from APM American Public Media.
Maria
I'm Maria, host of the Marketplace podcast. This is uncomfortable. And this week on the show we talk to Canadians boycotting the United States. We've had economic war declared on us, so it just feels like I am fighting for Canada as a soldier every single day. Plus, a financial therapist explains why aligning our spending with our values can feel so emotionally powerful.
Pat Cummings
It's one of the core needs that we have as humans is connection and connection to something bigger than us. And a boycott is something bigger than us.
Maria
Be sure to listen to this is uncomfortable. Wherever you get your podcasts.
Date: May 15, 2026
Host: Nancy Marshall Genzer
Reporters: Caitlin Tan
Guests: Pat Cummings (National Thoroughbred Alliance), John Stetton, Marshall Graham (Economics Professor, Rhodes College, horse breeder), Dan Aubel (OpenSecrets Senior Researcher)
This episode explores why horse racing, despite America’s long tradition of betting on the sport, is absent from the blossoming world of online prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket. The conversation delves into industry control, regulatory frameworks, and the changing culture of betting. Plus, a fast-paced look at shifting leadership at the Federal Reserve and a sharp uptick in defense industry lobbying as the Pentagon budget balloons.
Why horse racing is left out of surging online prediction markets despite a long legal and cultural history of betting on the sport.
Pat Cummings shares memories of his favorite race:
“Smarty Jones winning in 2004... I grew up in Philadelphia and it was just such incredible because the Philadelphia horse had won." (02:19 – Pat Cummings)
Marshall Graham and horse racing fans recall the tradition and excitement, underscoring the emotional resonance of historic races.
John Stetton recalls his family's deep connection to the racetrack, highlighting the generational culture:
"My mom was at the racetrack the day before I was born and at the racetrack about four or five days after I was born. With me and a stroller." (02:36 – John Stetton)
Pat Cummings explains the core issue:
“Back then you bet in person. Now, you don’t have to be at the track. You can bet online, but all through platforms okayed by the racing industry. And that doesn’t include prediction markets.” (02:45 – Pat Cummings)
John Stetton underscores the industry’s incentives:
“For the industry, it’s better to lock them out and just keep all the money for themselves and restrict where I wager.” (02:58 – John Stetton)
The reason, according to Cummings, is a federal law from 1978 that grants racetracks and horsemen control over their product, closing the door to outside platforms:
“Racetracks and horsemen control their product... because of a 1978 federal commerce law that still could face legal tests. But for now, the prediction markets haven’t gone that route.” (03:04 – Pat Cummings)
Marshall Graham, asked for a prediction for tomorrow’s race, points out you won’t find it on prediction markets:
“Let’s see... I will go with the hell we did. It'll be my long shot pick. But for now that bet’s not likely on Kalshee or Polymarket.” (03:25 – Marshall Graham)
President Trump’s request for a $1.5 trillion Pentagon budget (a 40% jump), with lobbying by defense contractors surging 10% over last year.
Dan Aubel, OpenSecrets Senior Researcher, gives data-driven context:
“Last year we saw a 24% jump in spending. So they are now spending over $50 million every three months.” (06:44 – Dan Aubel) “The majority of the money is spent by the big five prime contractors such as Lockheed Martin and RTX... Lockheed Martin, in particular, spent $15 million in 2025 and has already spent more than $4 million in the first quarter of 2026.” (07:09 – Dan Aubel) “Top 10 lobby spenders made up 40% of the total... they did spend almost $200 million last year, which is a substantial amount to get their foot in the door.” (08:49 – Dan Aubel)
Nancy Marshall Genzer asks:
“So is all this paying off? ...Did the companies that lobbied the most last year get the biggest contracts this year. Is there a correlation?” (08:37)
Aubel answers:
“They are clearly getting more than their money's worth. They have increased spending every year for the last five years, so there is evidence that they feel the same.” (09:45)
The episode balances economic analysis with personal narrative, conversational interviews, and clear reporting — all delivered in Marketplace’s signature concise, accessible tone.
In under 10 minutes, the episode explains why horse racing, despite its long tradition of legalized betting, is not offered on today’s booming online prediction markets: The industry’s legacy control, protected by a 1978 federal law, keeps outside platforms at bay. Through stakeholder anecdotes and expert commentary, the episode illustrates the intersection of regulation, industry interests, and market evolution. Elsewhere, it surfaces headline economic stories: major defense budget debates and the powerful impact of lobbying, underlining the deep connections between politics, money, and policy.