← Modern Wisdom
Loading summary
Transcript109 lines
- [00:00]
Chris Williamson
Before we get started, I'm going on tour this winter around the US And Canada, and you can join me. It's an hour and a half long show. There's a half hour Q and A at the end, there's meet and greet, there's music warmed up before I get started by Zach Talander. And tickets are limited and you can get yours right now. New York, Boston, Chicago, Austin, Salt Lake City and Denver still have limited tickets left at ChrisWilliamson Live. That's ChrisWilliamson Live. All right, let's get into it. J.K. rowling is back in the news. How do you feel about her recent debacle?
- [00:36]
Warren Smith
I can understand where she's coming from. I think it was effective. I don't see any problems with it. I can understand why she would say that. I would probably feel the same way if I were in her position, honestly.
- [00:50]
Chris Williamson
Yeah, she's become a lightning rod. So for the people that didn't here, Emma Watson went on Jay Shetty's podcast, said some stuff, and it seems, at least from the outside, like she's starting to sort of roll back some of the condemnation that's been there because maybe it's not as sort of trendy as it used to be. And this is kind of the big complaint that everybody has. Do you actually stand on this principle or are you just blowing with the fucking wind? And I think JK, in this big tweet that's had like 46 million impressions, which is. That's enough. That's enough to get people to take notice. She literally says it, like, basically, if it wasn't for the fact that she had to say that she loves and treasures me, JK wouldn't have piped up. But she is now beginning to detect this change, maybe in the sort of cultural weather. Vanessa. And yeah, dude, be careful what you say on the Internet.
- [01:55]
Warren Smith
Yeah, I think she's just. Emma Watson's being opportunistic. It's interesting, though, that the tide is turning in that way. That's how you can tell that it really is. Or when people start to perform differently like that. And it's all for business interests, I think, probably. But J.K. rowling, I mean, if it wasn't for J.K. rowling, I wouldn't be talking to you right now either. So some of those things applied. I was, when I was reading through that tweet is JK Rowling messaged me in the wake of my firing, and that really meant a lot to me. I think authenticity is something that's really important to her. But, yeah, she's a remarkable person to do that, to take the time to do that. So I have a soft spot in my heart for her. Always will. Mm.
- [02:43]
Chris Williamson
Why do you think she's such a lightning rod for this stuff? What's uniquely interesting about her position?
- [02:51]
Warren Smith
Well, I think it's first and foremost that her work is the best selling book in the world, next to the Bible. It's for millennials. It's our Star Wars. It's more than that. So she created this. She became richer than the queen off of fiction. So there's that. But I mean, her position, I think, is rather mainstream, conventional. It's not risque in any way. And I think that's why. That's one of the reasons I think it's become such a zeitgeist, because people, when they listen to it, it's like, this is very reasonable. It seems very logical. That's part of the reason why that video of me talking to the student did what it did, because it's just so common sense. It seems like there's nothing crazy about her position.
- [03:38]
Chris Williamson
Could you give a 30,000 foot view recap? I know it was a little while ago now, but just for the people that don't know the Warren Smith Law, just do the previously on this season.
- [03:51]
Warren Smith
Yeah, so I was teaching content creation, multimedia. We were supposed to do a newscast. Student was feeling kind of nervous, so I said, let's do a warmup. I'll sit here in the chair. You. What do you want to talk about? Just ask me. We would do things like this, have little podcasts. And he's like, well, how have your views on J.K. rowling changed? Given her bigoted opinions? It's like, okay, well, when you say bigoted opinions, what are you basing that on? Well, these. There's all these tweets. She said, I can show them to you if you'd like to see. Sure. Let's pull them up. So he pulls them up, we run through them. The whole exchange was like five minutes. I didn't think it was that interesting or that crazy, but that's. And then I uploaded it to, like, my Little Rinky Dink YouTube channel where I had clips of me teaching. And I called it, like, my teaching portfolio, because we had to submit artifacts for teaching, our portfolio. And I would have clips of me teaching. And someone grabbed it and pulled it over to Twitter, where I was not active on Twitter, and that's where it went crazy.
- [04:58]
Chris Williamson
Yeah. And then what happened?
- [05:01]
Warren Smith
Couple months went by. Everything Changed very quickly. Two days after that, Pierce Morgan had me on for like a 15 minute conversation. I was completely outta my depth. And I came in the next day and just acted like nothing happened and tried and that didn't work.
- [05:21]
Chris Williamson
Denial is always a wonderful strategy, I think.
- [05:25]
Warren Smith
Well, yeah, no, it didn't work. And then that. So then that afternoon, because Piers Morgan, his producers, they just want the flavor of the day. So they jumped right on it and they're like, will you do this? And I was working with one teacher. We used to record in this space. So after that we set the space up and started once a week making videos. And so I told him, I was like, they want me to come on Pierce Morgan. What should I do? Like, is the school gonna get mad? But he's like, yeah, they'll. They'll get mad. But he's like, just do it. You know, just. Because if I ask, they're just gonna give me some long thing that.
- [06:03]
Chris Williamson
Whatever it is, forgiveness.
- [06:05]
Warren Smith
Yeah. I knew I was in the midst of a once in a lifetime opportunity and I was at a fork in the road. It's like, do you make the most of this? And I didn't know where it would go at that time. All it was was one little video, you know, but there was the potential to try and make something. So I did it. It went on Piers Morgan. And then the next day they kind of got pissed. But then I had to meet with all the lawyers and they called me in with the head of the school and who's never there, but she was there for that. Well, you didn't break any rules. You didn't. You have the releases and you didn't reveal any information. You, you handled it delicately. You didn't really take a biased position. And so congratulations. They literally said, congratulations, you know, and then. But several. There were teachers there that were upset with. Solely on my position, my position around J.K. rowling, which, yeah, I think it's unfair to call her bigoted, but I didn't really say that in the video. But that's where the student arrived at. So they took it as a position and there were people coming up to be like, how are you not fired? And I was like, I didn't. They said, I didn't do anything wrong with it, you know, and. But there were people that were upset and it just kind of. But we kept making, in this space, kept making videos once a week, and it was getting a little bit of traction and I think they just were waiting until the storm blew over to be able to pounce it. And I get it. From a business perspective, it can be a liability if you have a teacher, like, making YouTube videos, and people are actually watching them to some extent, even though it's very small back then, so. But it was the way they did it. Like, I would understand if they'd be like, yeah, it's not quite our cup of tea. It's just a bit of a liability. So we're going to part ways. But that wasn't what. What happened at all. It was like, we'll sign this NDA. We'll pay you to sign this NDA. Felt like they were just trying to destroy me, dude. It was crazy. It was one of the most challenging periods of my life, for sure. Like, yeah, so that's. That's the lore.
- [08:24]
Chris Williamson
What have you come to reflect on with regards to that difficult time? I think a lot of people, maybe not quite so publicly, maybe not with quite so many eyeballs, but people go through periods where they get kicked in the nuts a lot, and it seems to happen sequentially in bunches with the benefit of hindsight. Now, how do you think about that experience as part of the arc of your life?
- [08:56]
Warren Smith
Well, it was the period that shaped me. It's one of the laws of narrative. Like, if you're trying to write a screenplay, you have to have obstacles for the hero to overcome or whatnot. And we're all trying to become the heroes in our own story, whether we want to admit it or not. And the more adversity. Like, literally the day, the week before that video went viral, I was watching the David Beckham documentary. I was like, this is a really good documentary. And this really resonates because he was getting knocked down, he was struggling, and that made it compelling. And then his son becomes a soccer player in the documentary. I don't care about this guy at all because he had no adversity. He was just handed this opportunity. So for some reason, that was in my mind just at that time, I wouldn't change anything. I got lucky. I. I was walking a knife's edge, but I made it through. It was scary. It was really difficult, but it's. I. I wouldn't change because if you make one adjustment, who knows how that would. So I. I wouldn't change anything. But it was. It's been remarkable. It was. I would describe it as, like. Cause I've been a genuine fan of this space. Been watching your show long time. The people I've gotten to meet. Imagine watching your favorite football team, and suddenly overnight, you're Given this opportunity to be on the field and Tom Brady's throwing you the. The football and you catch it now you just. I'm going to run as far down this field until someone tackles me, see how far I can get. That was my mentality, and that's what I'm doing, you know?
- [10:40]
Chris Williamson
Yeah, it's a. I resonate with that. The turning idols into rivals or friends is like a really weird sensation. It's a very facade thing, and it takes a little bit of time for you to sort of come back down to Earth and, you know, everybody can play it off as cool. And I think a lot of people in this space do. And after a while, you habituate. You're like, oh, there's Andrew Huberman or, oh, there's fucking Joe Rogan or whatever. Like, oh, there's Matthew McConaughey and Matthew McConaughey on the other week. And you do habituate to it in some ways, but there's a bit of me that doesn't want to. There's a bit of me that doesn't want to habituate to this. There's a bit of me that wants to say, yo, my favorite movie in history is Interstellar, and the main guy knows me personally by name and has my phone number. Yeah, that's fucking sick. Like, I should be fired up about that. Like, I should. I should. Every time that happens, I should be really excited and enthusiastic. I shouldn't be, like, cooler than cool yet. It's just all. It's all fucking Matt over there, you know, double M or whatever. Like, no, like, that's fucking sick. Like, let it infuse you.
- [11:54]
Warren Smith
That's how I felt when J.K. rowling sent me that message and was like, can I do anything that. That's the most treasured message I've gotten. It's just a message, but it's surreal. That was so surreal.
- [12:07]
Chris Williamson
Yeah.
- [12:08]
Warren Smith
So. And I don't. I didn't know how to respond to it. And I still think about it now that she's back in the news with everything we're talking about. I was like, man, I hope I didn't say anything like, Emma Watson.
- [12:17]
Chris Williamson
Yeah, I think it was fine. Yeah. You've got a. A quote that says when conversations are not allowed to occur, it only makes the problem worse.
- [12:28]
Warren Smith
Yeah, we've seen that for sure. And that's similar to something that's been kind of going viral that Charlie Kirk said. He's like, when conversations. When we stop talking, that's when bad things happen. That's when Violence occurs. So yeah, I think conversations are absolutely essential.
- [12:44]
Chris Williamson
There's only really two forms of communication that has impact. There's words and then there's violence like that. I can't think of what else there is like, I guess music, but you're not really communicating much through music.
- [13:01]
Warren Smith
Yeah, there's words in action. You know, I describe it as like words are the boats floating on the surface. And we really communicate most of what we really think, I think through non verbal communication and action. And back to the narrative idea with actors. That's what people like Matthew McConaughey really dig into is the subtext in the scene. They understand that the words are just the tools and, and anybody given enough time can memorize that script. But what Matthew McConaughey does so well is everything else beyond the words. Right. It's, it's kind of going off on a tangent there, but that's how I, I think about conflict is a form of action for sure.
- [13:39]
Chris Williamson
I, I was thinking about this. I did this retreat recently and it's the most intense thing that I've ever done. And I spent 12 hours a day from 9am until 9pm basically working with emotions on a farm in Sonoma County. And I still, to be honest, don't fully know what to make of it. I haven't come back down to planet Earth fully yet. But one of the things that I did realize is the amount of information that was conveyed during the exercises and the practices and the processes that we were going through as a, as a group and in pairs and on our own. So much of it was not about words. So little of it was actually about words. However, if you look at how most people communicate, it is through mediums that exclusively transact in words. There's no body language over message. There's not really even that much body language over what we're doing right now. There's just, there's the, the aperture through which you're seeing this is squeezing this communication down. And like you can sit with somebody and without getting into woo energy astral realm, fucking five dimensional territory, you can sit with someone and you can tell if that person that sat opposite you is calm and peaceful or agitated or sad without saying a fucking word. Right, okay. But all of that type of communication has been lost and I wonder whether it has. Um, it feels to me like it's led everybody, it's encouraged everybody to really lean into hypertrophying the word talking portion of things and completely pushing to one side that well, okay, well how do I feel Right now? Like, what is the emotional context that's going on here? How is this other person showing up? What are the things that aren't being said? What's the pacing between the words that they're saying? What's the tone that they're saying this in? You know, especially of a text message. All of this stuff is lost. And it reminded me working with emotions for an entire week and basically doing like Navy SEAL boot camp for fucking feeling your feelings really drilled it home to me how low resolution almost all of our communication is now. And okay, what are the implications of that if you keep on spinning it up?
- [16:01]
Warren Smith
Yeah, yeah, it's nothing. Replace in person for sure. Yeah, I don't really know what to say about that.
- [16:16]
Chris Williamson
Political violence, attitudes. Some new data that's just come out. The percentage of students who support using violence to stop a campus speech is up 10 points from 2021. So that's 34% against. 24%. 47% of Gen Z agree that violence can be justified to advance a political goal. That's against 22% of boomers. 47, 22. In 2025, 38% of U.S. college students said violence is acceptable to prevent hate speech on campus. And 71% of students are at least accepting of shouting down speakers. And 54% of physically blocking other students from attending a campus speech.
- [16:58]
Warren Smith
I recently did a video on a, an independent journalist, the guy with the camera on Emerson campus, which is my college, where I still teach like one class online, but I went there for grad school and have taught there. And he asked the students about that 34% survey and their response was, I'm surprised it's not higher at Harvard as well. He went to Emerson and then Harvard and at Harvard he asked that specific question. He goes, well, why? What do you mean? Well, Harvard's very liberal. I was just thinking, think about what you're saying. Like think about the logic there. It's. Liberals believe that violence is a legitimate form of response to speech. It's just crazy. It's been a crazy time, man.
- [17:44]
Chris Williamson
After Charlie Kirk, what's your post mortem culturally on this?
- [17:53]
Warren Smith
It's. I think it's getting worse because there's that period right after it where people are walking on eggshells. The people that disagree with them. People are being very careful and kind of sympathetic with those that disagree with them. Many, there's a lot of crazy people that this doesn't apply to. It's kind of this period of mourning and then that passes and the news cycle picks back up events continue and it, and people kind of revert back to their, their older ways. We're seeing what's happening in Portland. I, I just think it's, it's not looking good is my overall take. I think it was very illuminating though, seeing those responses, which has been some of a big wake up call for me. And I've been trying to shine a light on that as much as I can through these videos. But that hit me hard seeing that at Emerson because, but it didn't surprise me. But I'm hoping that people I know, like my family that disagrees with me, will see, will kind of understand more about where I'm coming from. Because it's like, look, this is like literally where I was, I was sitting next to these kind of people for years. This kind of, maybe this can explain a little bit of what, why I am the way I am now or, or whatnot. Cause I know they're struggling with understanding that around me. So that's been, I think a lot of it's been a wake up call for some people, but I'm generally my responsibility. I'm, I'm deeply concerned about it. Where this could go.
- [19:34]
Chris Williamson
This episode is brought to you by gymshark. You want to look and feel good when you're in the gym. Gymshark makes the best men's and girls gym wear on the planet. Let's face it, the more that you like your gym kit, the more likely you are to train. Their hybrid training shorts for men are the best men's shorts on the planet. Their crest hoodie and light gray marl is what I fly in every single time I'm on a plane. The Geo seamless T shirt is a staple in the gym for me. Basically everything they make. It's unbelievably well fitted, high quality, it's cheap. You get 30 days of free returns, global shipping and a 10% discount site wide. If you go to the link in the description below or head to Gym Shmodernwisdom, you can use the code ModernWisdom10 at checkout, that's Jim ShModernWisdom and ModernWisdom10 at checkout. What does that mean? What are you deeply concerned about and where could it go?
- [20:23]
Warren Smith
Well, so just yesterday we had Nick Shirley in Portland. The last video I did was covering him. And a guy comes up to him, antifa and he threatens to shoot him. And because he was putting a camera in his face. And then two snipers on top of the roof. This is what it Looks like from the video paint with their lasers on him. And Nick point. He's like, dude, there's a sniper pointing at you right now. And there's a dot on his chest. And it gets him to deescalate and back off. I think it's only a matter of time until it's not just painting a target and someone pulls the trigger on either side. And that's where I'm worried that something is going to happen that's going to escalate things.
- [21:15]
Chris Williamson
More so than Charlie Kirk being shot?
- [21:20]
Warren Smith
Well, what do you mean by more so?
- [21:23]
Chris Williamson
Because what is it that doesn't make that the escalation we've had, this event which has occurred. You're presumably one of the things. Let's say that that event hadn't occurred and you were noticing these rumblings below the surface. Charlie Cook being shot would be the precise sort of thing that would be the sort of thing that would be an escalation. So we've seen this one. So does it. Do you feel a little bit like there was a bunch of kerosene on the ground and someone lit a match and flicked it, but it happened to land just like a little bit off. It didn't quite catch fire to everything else. But that might not be the case if another inflammatory sort of event occurs.
- [22:00]
Warren Smith
Well, yeah, the kerosene was definitely there. It is interesting to note that there was not. There was not a massive response from Charlie Kirk fans. We'll just say people on the right or whatnot. There was not rioting. And yeah, that's been pointed out. But I think my concern would be. But that same event with the opposite side of the political spectrum. I mean, we've seen blm, we've seen the riots. There seems to be a tendency for certain ideologies tend to be more inclined to demonstrate frustration in different ways. So in a way, it's like, that's bad. They threw something really bad at the world. And a small sliver of hope perhaps comes out of the fact that we were able to handle it or this side was able of the spectrum. It didn't go bonkers. I don't have a. I mean, don't you feel in a way like this could go south? Am I off for feeling like there's potential here for this to cause? You're right, that was an escalation. I'm glad it didn't spark off into violence. Not. There's no rioting. Yes, there's protests going off in Portland around other topics. But I mean, what are your thoughts on it.
- [23:34]
Chris Williamson
I think you're right to be concerned. It, it does say a lot that we've kind of become desensitized. You were talking about the habituation earlier on, like, oh, there's J.K. rowling in my DMs. It's like, oh, there's a huge, like another assassination attempt on a real public figure in the space of 12 months. And I don't, it's strange, especially given that I'm still in my, my feely feels after, after my week working on emotions. It's strange that we are able to continue moving forward. That you can get up and go to work that like, that's just a thing that happens. And I guess, you know, humans need to fucking put bread on the table and go to the bathroom and walk the dog and stuff. But it doesn't exactly fill me with hope that this is, although horrific and an atrocity, just another news story that, you know, the world continues spinning. And yeah, we've got Charlie Kirk, Remembrance Day, I think, which was passed, which is a very nice tribute. But yeah, one question that I do have that I realized while you were talking there, how do you square the circle of what you brought up, which is hinting at a tendency for the left, at least parts of the left in its current iteration to be more kinetic, blm, riots, et cetera, et cetera, how do you square that circle? With some of the reports that I've seen coming out from maybe domestic threat, maybe FBI statistics saying that most of the domestic terror concern comes from right of center groups as opposed to left of center groups. Have you seen this? Do you know what I'm talking about?
- [25:35]
Warren Smith
No. Is this the study that people were saying, oh, they removed it or something? No, I'm not familiar with that study.
- [25:41]
Chris Williamson
Basically, it seems like a lot of the. Some of the studies suggest that it is groups right of center that are the biggest threat. I just wonder, taking my big broad perspective of the news stories that have really come across me over the last half decade, I would say the same thing. You know, we saw. What was that place where everybody. Charlottesville. You remember Charlottesville?
- [26:10]
Warren Smith
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
- [26:12]
Chris Williamson
Like, when was the last time that we saw something like a Charlottesville? I, I can't remember.
- [26:19]
Warren Smith
Yeah, I don't, I, I can't remember either. Well, January 6th, they would probably.
- [26:24]
Chris Williamson
There we go. Yes, that is true. That was quite a big one. Says it all, that I've managed to forget that. So, yeah, fair enough. Maybe, maybe you're right. Maybe it's. Maybe it's Equal on both sides.
- [26:35]
Warren Smith
I don't, I'm not saying it's equal, but it's, I've been trying to look at this not through the lens of. Because it becomes a reductive game. It's to try and equivocate.
- [26:43]
Chris Williamson
Equivocate your side.
- [26:45]
Warren Smith
Yeah. Your side did January 6th and this and you did this on this date. And our side and it's like we're not, that's not.
- [26:51]
Chris Williamson
Yeah. I just think it's how many January 6th is one BLM. How many? Yeah, yeah.
- [26:56]
Warren Smith
Because my here my initial response and this is the. I think for many people it was like this is not what right versus Left. This is good versus evil. But then it's like wait a minute. But that's exactly what can. That's a dangerous game to play because that's what can drive people to kill someone like Charlie Crook because they think they're facing genuine evil. I have friends that have kind of tossed me away because they what's a friendship? When you're genuinely up against fascism and genuine evil in their minds, which is in their minds what I stand for. So you've got to be very careful how you diagnose that. So I've been reducing that down to it's correct behavior versus incorrect behavior. Really. Because there's also plenty of Democrats or liberals that aren't celebrating Charlie Kirk's death and that would say you're ridiculous for saying these things. So it's not just Democrat, Republican, but so the, the there's going to be people with incorrect behavior on the right side and the left side. But I think there's something about the ideology of or this way of thinking that has flourished from postmodernism victim mentality. It resonates with a certain personality that seems to me to resonate more with mass protesting, more inclination towards what we saw around the riots, Summer of Love BLM riots. So I, I, I do there is something within the ideas reflected largely on this side echo with certain types of action versus the ideas reflected on. We'll just say the traditional conservative family, more religious values, the per the personal responsibility, have a family. These things conserve the tr. Great traditions of the past. There's not as much inclination what I just said towards burn it down as opposed to we're all being oppressed by this, by the west, burn it down. Which is literally baked into the ideology of the West.
- [29:02]
Chris Williamson
It's interesting, isn't it? Because the burn it down thing, I don't know, it feels a little bit like if you were to tell somebody from 10 years ago that it would be people on the right that weren't responding to this sort of stuff in a kinetic way, I think that might be a little bit surprising. You know, you, you. One of the big concerns that lots of people have who are in the center is that if the left keeps on poking the bear, then the right is going to respond eventually. Which it sounds like is one of the concerns you have. Or you just get escalating violence on all sides. But the right is really fucking well armed and there's probably a lot of people in there that are ex military and et cetera, et cetera. So like if you were to just take the attributes of both sides, you should assume. I think that right is I. Fucking hell. Like those guys are going to be pretty quick on the. On the trigger. Like defending myself, defending my beliefs, defending my tribe in that way as opposed to a group that on the surface is like more compassionate, more open. And it doesn't seem to be necessarily playing out that way.
- [30:11]
Warren Smith
Yeah, I think it's unlikely that we'll see a civil war in the way we think of civil war where it's literally an organized. Like they have declared themselves independent and they are rebelling against. It would be the federal government with all the military and police. I think that's. Unless it was some bizarre. Like certain states went. I just can't imagine it. So when I'm talking about escalating conflict, it's. I don't necessarily mean this as a civil war. It's something, something like much more invisible, less. More difficult to see that. I don't, I don't know. I don't think it's going. Yeah.
- [31:03]
Chris Williamson
All right, so going back to the. The stats about campus being shouted down.
- [31:08]
Warren Smith
Yeah.
- [31:09]
Chris Williamson
If free speech can be shouted down, does it even exist at all? Like, what does it mean when it comes into contact with a human arm in arm blockade?
- [31:28]
Warren Smith
That's a good question. I would say philosophically it still does exist because yes, rights are always. I got into a pickle around this, but Andrew Wilson was talking about this. Rights are bound by force and rights. He's someone who claims that rights all come down at the end of the day to what can be enforced. So your right to freedom of speech. It's only if it still is going to be bound by force. It's only if you can protect it. But yes, I can be. People can shout me down. But that doesn't negate within the context of the legal system. Like it doesn't negate my but functionally, yeah, in the moment, functionally, you're shouting me down.
- [32:11]
Chris Williamson
Yeah, I understand. Spoken like a true academic that the theory, the principle, the philosophy of free speech is still there. But if it can't be actioned in the real world, is that. Am I being, am I being stupid here or is this like a big problem?
- [32:31]
Warren Smith
No, it would just have to be at such a large scale for it because, okay, they shout me down on the college campus, I go make a YouTube video about it and I reach way more people. So. But in that moment on the college campus, yes, but I have this kind of my personal philosophy and I can't, is that there's objective truth, the fabric of reality, which is reflected by this, what I call the audience. Kind of when you make a YouTube video, it's this thing that it's not just a mass of people, but. And you can't, you can't ignore. There's no escaping them. So if they shout me down on the campus, you, they can't escape the audience, which reflects the fabric of reality. So then I do make a video about it. It's almost like they're actions compound and it draws more attention to it because they're taking an action against something that I think is very much real. These are not just social constructs. The idea of freedom of speech, yes, we have these conceptualizations of them. That's how we use the words floating on the surface to articulate it. But I think these are the same idea the founding fathers put forth with. These truths are self evident from God, objective truth, whatever you want to substitute there. But that's the fabric of reality. And so there's no the audience. People can make noise, but nothing can change. What is that objective truth that we're striving for? And I think that that's what knowledge is, is trying to map onto what is truth, which is the exact opposite of postmodernism though. And that's where it gets interesting.
- [34:06]
Chris Williamson
Before we continue, you are probably not eating enough fruit and vegetables. You know, it's. This is going to help. AG1 just released their next gen formula, which is a more advanced, clinically backed version of the product I've been drinking every day for years, delivering more than 75 vitamins, including your multivitamin, pre and probiotics, superfood greens and more. And for the first time, they've added new flavors, tropical citrus and berry, only available in the US and Canada. Sorry for that, but you do still get the same one scoop ritual now with an even more thoughtful formulation flavor and four clinical trials behind it. Designed with absorption and efficacy in mind, AG1 has been evolving continuously since 2010, alongside the latest research and NextGen is clinically shown to help fill common nutrient gaps and support gut health even in people who already eat well. In one study, it boosted healthy bacteria in the gut by 10 times. If you're still unsure, they've got a 90 day money back guarantee so you can buy it and try it every single day for three months. It's if you don't like it, they will just give you your money back. So you've got nothing to lose. Right now you can get a year's free supply of vitamin D3K2 and AG1 travel packs, plus that 90 day money back guarantee by going to the link in the description below or heading to drinkag1.com modernwisdom that's drinkag1.com modernwiry do you think government funding should hinge on whether a university actually protects dissenting voices?
- [35:34]
Warren Smith
Protects dissenting voices? I do. It's there's a big conversation to have around tax why taxpayers are financing places like Emerson. But they're, but they get so sneaky in those parameters. So for example, Emerson just changed what used to be the Social justice center because of this very issue what you're describing. They, they just changed the name to the Office of Equal Opportunity because equality is equal opportunity, equity is equal outcome. So they, they learned and that's what colleges are doing. But then you see the video content or you talk to students and they're I'm surprised it's only 34% celebrating Charlie Kirk's barter. It's so but yeah, my answer to you would be yes. I don't think I'm very skeptical about the government providing tax money to these universities.
- [36:36]
Chris Williamson
It doesn't seem to me like children and young people, students are being taught to resolve problems constructively. This feels like a skill issue.
- [36:52]
Warren Smith
Yeah, I mean I, I think it it's because so few of the professors, the people that would be having the conversations have differing opinions. It's just overwhelming. It's impossible to even articulate unless you see it for yourself. Which is what I'm trying to do with the videos. It's the closest I can do is when I see footage like that. That's when I get most excited. Like my favorite video I ever made was Joe Rogan talking to a postmodern professor on his show. Because to me that was like finally I can shine a light where this is a real professor who's saying these things with his own words. Because I could talk till I'm blue in the face about postmodernism. Jordan Peterson has done it. And people just don't believe you or they just roll their eyes and they're. It's too philosophical. Like they don't. But then you hear him get up there and say no, there's no such thing as knowledge, objective truth. Everything is a social construct. He's effectively, he's making it crystal clear that there's no such thing as the fabric of reality to strive for because knowledge is evolving. Therefore his logic is we don't really know anything. And we've. You could see where that. That goes. I guess my point is like, it's just. You have to hear it straight from the horse's mouth. And that was one example where I was able to do that and I was like, he's literally saying it to you. So if this doesn't show you, I don't know what will.
- [38:25]
Chris Williamson
Yeah, it, it feels a little bit to me like inverse exposure therapy. So the fact that so few alternate voices are going onto campus that whatever some absurd percentage of students self censor for fear of being judged and shamed by their fellow classmates. That you have a changing, shifting demographic when it comes to who is teaching at universities as well. You even have a shifting demographic of who's attending universities, right? A significant increase in. In women going versus men. And it's very difficult to be a university professor that didn't go to university. So like that is your stock of future professors are the ones that are going. And all of these things together is a great, great study by Corey Clark. You should have a look at it. It's stinks of you. It stinks of your channel. Brilliant. And she sent a survey to every psychology professor in the US didn't get a response from all of them. Got a big fucking response talking about what topics should not be allowed. And there's a huge sex difference. There's a massive sex difference between men and women. And there's a huge difference. It was really, really interesting. My point is when you take this milieu altogether, what you end up with is. Is students basically never hearing top down like side to side or random inclusions of other people from speakers and. And guests and stuff like that. There is this ever actually and inside out, right? With their own self censorship like there is just this a increasing fragility or an increasing sort of uni. Unidimensionality. Uni dimensionality to the type of topics that they're Being exposed to that all makes sense.
- [40:33]
Warren Smith
Yeah, no, that's. That's absolutely true. It's just worse than. It's. It's. You're absolutely right.
- [40:40]
Chris Williamson
I'm right, but it's worse than I'm right.
- [40:42]
Warren Smith
Words. There's no words. This is the limitation of words. Like, there's no words to capture what is actually happening.
- [40:50]
Chris Williamson
How so?
- [40:54]
Warren Smith
So. All right, so. So when I'm making these YouTube videos, it's like. Or just this whole thing we've been talking about the desensitization of this medium and how you. Oh, it's so and so. And it all becomes. It all starts to feel. It's just online. It's just about making content for sponsors so I can put food on the table. You lose sight of it. Then something happens. Bang. Charlie Kirk gets killed. And it, it's. And other things have happened. I returned home in the wake last year, last Christmas, I return home. It's like re. Entering the real world, sitting there with my childhood friends who literally. So I had just been fired before, they said, similar to how people responded to the Charlie Kirk thing in many cases. I'm sorry you lost your job, Warren, but you did say this about J.K. rowling, so what do you expect? And walking through literally step by step, logically, like the flaws that she's pointing out are completely fair to have those concerns. It's a reminder that this is real. There's something at stake here. When and when Charlie Kirk died, it suddenly. It was a wake up call. It's not just. It was. It's not just about sponsors, money and stuff. I forgot where. But I forgot where we were going with that. It's more than just words. It's hard to capture the reality of how crazy this stuff really is.
- [42:36]
Chris Williamson
Yeah.
- [42:36]
Warren Smith
What.
- [42:37]
Chris Williamson
What do you think's going on with young people's support of political violence? Is it because of conviction, desensitization? What do you think's going on?
- [42:47]
Warren Smith
Because going back to that fear I had about good and evil and that being very careful about that because they genuinely believe that they're facing true evil. So to the point where those child. Like I'm talking. My best friends, like grew up together since Yay tov. In their minds, even if they don't hate me, I'm giving voice to. They can excuse me in their minds, but my videos perhaps, or talking to Joe Rogan or whoever that is, is part. Is contributing to something. Even if I'm not evil, I'm playing a role in something that is so genuinely truly evil to them. So we need to. And then all bets are off. And that's when you see people lose friends. People do things they would never otherwise do. And the only solution to this is rational conversations. And that's, that's why this thing has made such a wake up. Because that's exactly what Charlie was doing. He was killed doing just that. He was killed doing the solution and it didn't work. And it, he was, he was killed. He was killed for doing the thing that is the only thing you could do to prevent this. So that's even a double whammy. It makes it even scarier, you know, so. But the problem is, is that when I try and have those going back to most childhood friends and when I try and have those conversations step by step, if I can sit down with them, I can genuinely, I guarantee you by the end of it, they won't think the way they thought coming into it. They still are going to disagree with Trump. That's not what it's about. It's about something deeper than that. And I can get there if you get it might take me an hour. I've done it, I've done it over and over with people in my personal life. The problem is that they'll shut down the conversation.
- [44:42]
Chris Williamson
Why?
- [44:48]
Warren Smith
Because it, it's almost. Because the logic is not there. Because it's almost as though they, because they can't get. So the J.K. rowling example, I get fired. I'm sitting on the porch at Christmas, my mom's house. Yeah, guys, I get. All right, so you. Yes, I did say that about J. Carroll. I said that with the student. But you do understand, right? Like, so tomorrow, just hear me out. It's like tomorrow. Is there anything stopping me from deciding I'm a woman? Well, no, Warren, logically you could. It's true. Okay, so I still have male genitalia. If I can then tomorrow walk into a women's changing room. Can you understand why a mother, a woman would be uncomfortable by that? They have a problem with that. Okay, but what if she's. Yeah, but she's an adult. She should be able to get over it. Okay, but what if she has a 6 year old? Can you understand why she would be uncomfortable with that? And I. There's no way to. How do you contend with, with that argument though? If you can see a flaw in that, like challenge me on it. That would be really. If you can provide any pushback on anything, please do. Because that's where this, these things get interesting. It would make it Way more interesting too. Conflict, drive, story is the central law of narrative. But that's my answer to you is why it's just the law. It comes down to the logic.
- [46:21]
Chris Williamson
It seems like you are getting. It seems like this is sort of really hitting it at something deep for you, like this mission and the challenges that you're facing by sort of trying to come head to head with this, whether it's virtually or in your personal life.
- [46:39]
Warren Smith
Yeah, it's been infuriating. It's, it's. And that would be my response to them, a family member, when they say that's like, look, if everyone, When I come home, or if, and this is before viral videos or doing YouTube or anything, this is years ago. I'd say look, if I'm. Every one of you hates me because of this, right? If all people, your friends, they all hate me now. But if I'm still willing to have these conversations and want to rationally step by step walk you through it, maybe that would indicate that if I'm still doing this and I'm still standing firm on it, maybe that would be an indicator that I've thought this through and I have a reason why. And I think that goes back to your previous questions. That's one of the reasons, I think that they shut down the conversations. Because there's something, there's. That kind of goes back to the logic of it. It's. It's you. I have thought this through. Like I have a reason. I've, I've. That's why that video at Emerson was so important to me. Because that was my opportunity to kind of. To shine a window on what I've been going like, what I. The people I have sat with for years. And it's, there's no words for it, but I can, With a camera, I can show it. I don't need words.
- [47:55]
Chris Williamson
Yeah, it's weird. I guess we're not too far off from Thanksgiving now. And every year there's the same sort of memes come up online. How to speak to your bigoted uncle this year over the. Or the sort of based reverse version of that, which is three sentences to say to totally torpedo this year's Thanksgiving dinner. And people are going to be thinking about this. Man, I would love, you know, it would be great and ridiculously difficult to do as a. A survey would be some sort of analysis of the average volume, like sentiment analysis and volume and speaking cadence and like antagonism around the Thanksgiving table. Like it's just a one once per year little test, like a A core sample right out of the ground. I will take this one and take this one and take this one. And I have to assume that that curve is just getting really fucking steep and like, really, really getting up there now. And I think another question that I've got. We always hear, we heard this around Trump. You know, people made a bunch of jokes about thoughts and prayers to quote, literally Hitler, that it's very difficult to, with one sentence say that this guy is fascist, beginning of the end, reincarnation of the Third Reich, and with the other, show compassion. And those two things seem a little bit tough because I guess the subtext, the implication is the language that you used in the first case is the reason for the event which caused the need for the apology. Right. That when you use inflammatory language, when you use sort of violent media, My question is basically how much of that is shaping young people's tolerance for real world violence? Like, is it just reflecting what's happening bottom up, or is it actually pushing it forward, sort of normalizing this kind of language, demonizing one side and the other. And it's not as if this is only going in one direction, like the demonization goes in both.
- [50:03]
Warren Smith
Yeah, but there's. There's legitimate. That's the problem is there's legitimately wrong behavior. Objectively wrong. Like, I think it is safe to say that it's objectively wrong to celebrate Charlie Kirk's death. And the response, some of the responses we've seen are crossing, I think, an objective, measurable line. Again, it's gonna. It's because we see the world through stories. We make sense because we're narrative creatures and we conflict drives story. And it's this thing that's driving people to genuinely believe the other side is, is evil, while also holding the, the thought in mind that there is evil there. And we can see examples of where that is. That's what I started. That's why I started the response with that, because it does exist. You just gotta be careful about it. The solution, I, the only solution is to teach people that are claiming these things about fascism. They need, People need to explain more what fascism actually is. And it's such a. That's why I keep saying, I did get to talk to Joe Rogan and I was trying to delve into that a little bit with him, because that is the singular, to me, a window in time that has so much insight. And look, today it's. People are throwing around fascism which echoes back to them, but they don't understand what fascism is. And yeah, it's slightly. It is difficult to define in a single sentence, but I think it's the authoritarian pursuit of national purity through force. Something around those lines at the very core of it and then components can be switched out. But it's a dangerous. It's a dangerous game. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the. I think you're asking how to. Where that's coming from.
- [51:51]
Chris Williamson
Which direction basically is it simply is the violent, how impactful? It's the age old question of like do violent video games make children violent? What I'm asking is, is violent media, as in the sort of language inflammatory especially sort of escalating up and using really horrific examples of people from history or from movies or from whatever to describe. So someone like Jordan Peterson was Red Skull, right, from the Marvel comics. I'm sure that there's been a thanos example used somewhere. And I'm sure that the right as well is slinging its fair share of murder. Whatever this particular person is that's coming in to sterilize the youth or let's.
- [52:36]
Warren Smith
Try and hone in on that. Like what would an example be on the right? Because I know it's absolutely happening on the, on the left, like Red Skull, the accusations of fascism, it's everywhere. But what would be, let's try and identify it on the other side.
- [52:50]
Chris Williamson
So the problem for me, I think is that the response to these sorts of stories is always larger than the initial story itself. And that means that given most of what I follow online is center. Center right. What I see is crazy left of center stories that are then being responded to by somebody from the Daily Wire, whatever, whatever it might be. It does seem to. I'm trying to equivocate basically to at least give the opportunity that I don't know everything. I'm. I don't see all of the Internet. And I'm like, look, given that maybe there is some stuff out there, I have to assume that there is some stuff. But you might be right. I may have a perfectly representative perspective. My sample may be like absolutely perfect when it comes to understanding what I see on the Internet. If I was to go by my own algorithm, which is obviously hugely fucking biased. If I was to go by my own algorithm, I would say yes, there does seem to be a lot more of that inflammatory language going from left to right. The purity spiral stuff, the holier than thou, the very, very sort of accusatory, vindictive, over exaggerated language does seem to go in one direction. But I just need to leave myself open to the fact that I See what you mean. I don't.
- [54:09]
Warren Smith
It's on the right too. You're right. I, there's people, the accusations around Jews, things like that. It's, there's, there's, I mean racism, there's, you see it on X cr. There's lines. Being that personally I don't think that there are certain lines I don't think should be crossed or being crossed on X. For sure, you're right. Yeah.
- [54:28]
Chris Williamson
In other news, Shopify powers 10% of of all e commerce companies in the United States. They are the driving force behind gymshark, Skims, Aloe and Nutonic. Which is why I partnered with them. Because when it comes to converting browsers into buyers, they are best in class. Their checkout is 36% better on average compared to other leading commerce platforms. And with shop pay, you can boost conversions by up to 50%. They've got award winning support there to help you every step of the way. Look, you are not going into business to learn how to code or build a website or do backend inventory management. Shopify takes care of all of that and allows you to focus on the job that you came here to do, which is designing and selling an awesome product. Upgrade your business and get the same checkout that I use with Nutonic. On Shopify right now, you can sign up for a $1 per month trial period by going to the link in the description below or heading to shopify.commodernwisdom all lowercase, that's shopify.com/modern wisdom to upgrade your selling today. Yeah, I mean you had, you had this idea about when, when you know that sort of behavior has gone too far. Is there such a thing, the line between correct and incorrect behavior?
- [55:42]
Warren Smith
There you go. That's the, that's the question at the heart of it because. So going back to postmodern thinking, which most people echoing the sentiment don't realize, they're talking about postmodernism. So you go to a therapist, the therapist, to them there's no such thing as correct behavior. They're not going to tell you what to do. They're not, they're just going to affirm because it's just a matter of perspective. There's no such thing as the right way to do something. There is no ideal behavior in any given scenario in that worldview. But I disagree. That's why I talk about the fabric of reality which we strive for. Even if you can't achieve that ideal, you have to have the target to aim for, which means there is an ideal Whether we can achieve it or not, there is a best way to behave in any given scenario. And you can judge that. If you had parallel universes, that you could measure each different type of action and then you could actually see the outcomes, you could compare those outcomes, and one logically will have to be better than all other potential outcomes. One has to be. But you have to have a way to quantify it. Right. Like so. But so to answer, yeah, there's. There is. That's. We've lost sight of that. It's become this postmodern idea of everything is just a matter of perspective and is equally valid. There's no narrative, no shared meta narrative. There's no ideal shared story that is better than any other story. Everything is equal. It's just a matter of perspective. And it's really a dangerous. That's really a dangerous idea. So I'm glad you mentioned that.
- [57:22]
Chris Williamson
How do you. How do you operationalize this? How do you. What does it mean for a society to say that behavior is bad or that it's gone too far or that. That this is something. This is. This is a line that's being crossed. You mentioned that before. I feel like a line has been crossed. And that was a line has been crossed within space. Speech, right?
- [57:43]
Warren Smith
Yes.
- [57:43]
Chris Williamson
Talk to me about that. I need you to dig into that.
- [57:45]
Warren Smith
That's why we have the legal framework, because that's the closest we can come to actually writing in black and white what these lines are. So freedom of speech, for example, how do we determine when speech crosses that objective line? Well, hate speech. No, because who can define hate speech? We can't. There's no way to determine where that line exists. So the best we can do, the least bad way of approaching this, they're all going to be flawed. The least bad one is to say, okay, we have these laws that draw these lines, calls to violence, defamation, whatever they are. But those are laws. And beyond that, you have legal freedom of speech now. Yes, an employer can create their own framework because they have the freedom to pay who they want to pay and how they want to do it. But we're talking about that larger framework, and that's really what laws act as. Which is why the J.K. rowling debate comes back to where the rubber meets the road, which is the legal framework. Tomorrow, if I can decide that I'm a woman, the real question is, am I a woman under the law? Not do you need to use my pronoun? That. That is the question. Everything else is beneath that question. It's am I treated as a woman under the law, because today, if I were to walk into that space, that changing room, they have the legal right to call the police. Now tomorrow, if I can decide on my woman and I walk in that same space, do they have the legal right to call the police? It has larger ramifications, and that's what J.K. rowling has been trying to articulate to everyone. Just that it all comes back to that. Which all comes back to the legal framework, which is our attempt to create these objective. Lots of.
- [59:28]
Chris Williamson
I mean, it is. I mean, I was gonna say it's a shame that we have to rely on the legal framework to get people to behave in a pro social manner, but maybe that's just like human nature is.
- [59:39]
Warren Smith
I don't think we do. It's just we have to have some. We have to have it written. We have to have the constraints.
- [59:46]
Chris Williamson
Yeah, sorry, I don't mean. I don't mean that it's a shame that that is a thing that exists. It obviously needs to exist. My point is, it's a shame that we're having to think about that is what we now rely on as opposed to, you know, common decency, shared humanity, et cetera, et cetera. Like massive scaling problem. When you don't see people as your neighbor, you don't see them as human. I realized this. There was. There was this insight that I'd had, I think watching the rise of Peterson was the first one that I really saw this with. There seems to be a level of fame or exposure or notoriety threshold. And when people cross that, some big portion of the world doesn't see them as a human anymore. They see them as a conglomeration of ideas. They're a representation of an. Like an ideology or story or narrative.
- [60:38]
Warren Smith
Or something right there. The story. Because we see. Because we're narrative creatures and we see the world through stories, we cannot separate the character from the story. So when you see Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson, it's all the past context you have psychologically is impacting how you see them. The only way to really perceive that the massive amount of that effect would be to have parallel universes where you could have a politician who's Trump do the exact same action, same proposed policy, but doesn't have the backstory, the story of Trump, and you could see how the audience responds and you could have some quantifiable outcome. That's the only way we could ever begin to really observe the. Just how powerful this effect is.
- [61:19]
Chris Williamson
But the thing that you notice, at least that I saw when this threshold has been breached, people seem to be prepared to do and say things that they wouldn't of a person who doesn't have that story armor, whatever it is that they think that they've got, that hasn't gone through that altitude. And it was disheartening. It was disheartening to think, you know, these people are still people on the other side of this. Like, if you say this thing or send this thing, I've spent the last seven and a half years, you'll be episode like 1005. At no point on this journey to building this platform has someone sat me down and taught me about like the Super Secret Squirrel technique that is only taught to people that are moderately fucking well known on the Internet of how to not feel really disturbed when nasty shit happens. Like, there's no and. And the champagne problems. You know, what an issue. Do you not know that people are in poverty? You just need to make videos. Hey, hey. I do not disagree, but the social issues are still a social issues. Like if you felt ostracized or condemned or like you were being accused of all of these things, it would be tough. And yeah, it was really interesting to me that there is a size that you get to where you are no longer seen as a human and it changes the way that people behave. And I fear that Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk had breached that as well.
- [62:53]
Warren Smith
Yeah, I don't. I wouldn't know about that. I'm not near that size you have. Charlie Kirk did. But I think you're right. I think you're. I've heard you talk about this before. I understand it's a real. And I know people dismiss it as champagne problems, but it comes with baggage. Just my little bit of whatever this is that I'm do it. Yeah, it's. It has. There's a cost for sure, but it's.
- [63:20]
Chris Williamson
It's not just the cost. I don't think it's the lack of. It's the lack of humanity from people seeing. Seeing those individuals that like Joe Rogan, like, you can do and say whatever you want about that guy or, you know, like, pick somebody on the other side. Like, holy fuck. Some of the stuff, true or not, funny or not, that was said about Joe Biden last year was fucking horrific. Like, think about if you are that guy, you're this dude who has been thrust into a position that you were physiologically really, really going to struggle with, probably pumped with all manner of whatever they needed to keep that racehorse running for the space of four years. And you're just like, oh, it made. It made me feel really sad. Made me feel really, really sad for him, for the human that is Joe Biden. Like, holy fuck. So awful what he had to go through. And. But people are just like, well, you know, like, you rise to the top and the. The arrows are going to be slung your way or whatever. I don't know, maybe I'm too much of a.
- [64:31]
Warren Smith
No, no, it's not that you're a big A. It's because you. Because your ego is in check and you have. So your ego is not flawed because you've achieved success. You know, you're like a handsome guy, tall, worked it. You work out, whatever, all that stuff. It's like you don't have anything to prove. So you are now in this place where you have the. I get what you mean. I don't know the words for it. I don't know how to describe it, but it comes down to. It's the attachment to ego that I've And I encounter that often, man. It's. Ego is really the emotion, is the death of reason and motion comes from ego.
- [65:08]
Chris Williamson
What's the relationship with ego and dehumanizing people?
- [65:13]
Warren Smith
I think we want to dehumanize people from a place of ego. Often it's like. Well, it depends on the example. Maybe if you dislike someone, a co worker, for example, maybe this is a bad example because it would be a co worker, but they have something you don't have. Or someone makes a video criticizing Chris Williamson's take on this political thing, and do you respond with a counter video that's kind of going off the wall? And when you. A person that would respond is probably doing so from a place of ego. I think it often comes from that thing that we call ego, what ego means. We could. Yeah.
- [65:54]
Chris Williamson
At least for me. It. It. Perhaps part of it is the champagne problems thing. This person has enough going on that the. There's like a ballast in the system. Right. They've got like enough. Enough buffer stability that I can use them as this sort of like, rhetorical punching bag in a way when Jordan was ill a few years ago or when who was the guy who got attacked by the dude in the. With. With the hammer in the house, like last year.
- [66:32]
Warren Smith
Yeah, I forget. His.
- [66:33]
Chris Williamson
Not Elizabeth Warren's husband, somebody else's husband. And on that you go, Jesus Christ. Like an old dude getting attacked by a guy in his house. And look, maybe this is just what. Maybe this is the most basic bitch point in history, which is people Become famous. And then people take the piss out of them and are mean. Like, perhaps it's that, but it feels like it's something a little bit deeper than that to me, this sort of loss of humanity. And I wonder whether it's tribalism that this person begins to represent something that you either agree with or disagree with. So they're kind of like a flag bearer in some sort of a way, or a totem or a mascot. And like, you're behind this thing or you're against this thing, and if it's a big thing, like you kind of throw arrows at it or. And if you're with it, then you kind of defend it vehemently. And that, you know, just naturally sort of spirals up the inflammatory language. Maybe that plays a role. I feel. I feel like it does, yeah.
- [67:28]
Warren Smith
I mean, it's the example of Jordan Peterson, if people were people. Yeah. The way they were attacking him, the way they're going to continue, oftentimes I do think it comes from that part that's missing from them. It's almost as though they're jealous of in some way. They would never say this, probably, whether it's his ability to think what he has achieved or being at peace with straddling two worlds and not, you know, falling into one tribe. What you're talking about, this team mentality, I think is so silly because, like, where it's people, so many people are. It's like, I'm on this team, therefore I'm going to check off all the boxes. And that's how they form their thinking. It's just. I don't understand that, as opposed to going point by point following the logic.
- [68:15]
Chris Williamson
Well, yeah, I mean, if you. If I know one of your opinions and from it I can accurately predict everything else that you believe. You're probably not a serious thinker. Right, Right. You've. You've taken a onesie and put it on and called it an outfit. But no, that. That's mono thinking. Right. And you know, it's because the demand for answers outstrips most people's supply. And in. In that case, you have to retrofit all issues. All questions are given the same answer. Everything is climate change, or everything is capitalism, or everything is progressivism, or everything is lgbt. Everything is fascism. Yeah. And that mono thinking is a great shortcut. The human brain loves those. Right?
- [68:59]
Warren Smith
Yeah.
- [69:00]
Chris Williamson
But it's an indication, like, if you've just. Here's a good way to think about it. When was the last time that a content creator that you like Or a person that you read, some news contributor or when was the last time that they surprised you with their take? Like I would say, for instance, that Bill Maher is somebody who regularly surprises me with his takes. And that makes me. Sam Harris fucking almost always surprises me with his takes. If I was to like roll a dice and try and predict what it is that's going to come next out of Bill Maher or Sam Harris, there's some. I have some predictive power, but not that much, to be honest. And I'm like, wow, that fuck. I didn't think he was gonna say that. And that's good. I think that's a good thing. But what it feels like to people on your side, it feels like you're an unreliable ally. And what it looks like to people on the other side is a lack of conviction. It's like, see, see, he's not with them on that thing. I mean, he was with them on whatever, but January 6th, he's not with them there. And he was with them on Covid masking, but he's not with them on immigration. And you go, okay, that looks so much like an opportunity for both sides. Like people in your own camp and people in the other camp, neither of them are going to agree with you. For you dissenting, the other group is going to remember the fact that you didn't agree with them previously. And your own group is going to be like, well, Warren, fucking hell. I thought you were with us on gun control. You were with us on immigration or you were with us on economic policy or on health care. And I'm obsessed with this idea, fucking obsessed with this idea of what I think is it's so cool.
- [70:47]
Warren Smith
That's especially when it comes to high, we'll call them high stakes topics like Christianity or whatnot, where it comes down to faith and belief. And that's essentially what happened with Jordan Peterson Jubilee. That the criticism he got from that, which I think is silly, but he had a really interesting response to that where it was essentially an argument of utility. He's saying, because I can reach more people, there's a reason that I don't want to. Beyond just that it's private and it's extremely complicated. He's a guy who's always straddling that reality that words are just the tools and everything of substance is beneath the surface. And that's what gives him that ability because he's doing things with those tools no one else does. He's like actually trying to reach more people with an incredibly complicated topic. The problem is with Christianity, it's literally. And I struggle with that. I consider myself a Christian, but I struggle with the idea that all you need to do is say the right words and that makes you a Christian. And if you don't say the right words and claim so many people genuinely seem to believe that it's, you have to literally just proclaim certain things in order to be saved. That's really important to them. The words that you say, the right words. That's. I'm not disagreeing with any of the beliefs or anything, but I, I, I do, I tend to. There's things that Jordan Peterson says about this topic that I resonate with on a gut level.
- [72:20]
Chris Williamson
Yeah, it's a strange one, man. It is a fascinating time to navigate the world of rhetoric and communication. And what do you think the neck, I mean, you don't have a crystal ball, but what do you think the next few years looks like in terms of the way that this communication goes forward? Have you got any early inclinations?
- [72:53]
Warren Smith
Well, the, the ramifications of like this technology, this medium is changing everything. We're seeing that it's hider, it's harder to hide anything. And in that sense, I think it's a good thing because I do have this sense of the fabric of reality exists and that the audience doesn't lie. That audience, meaning that's reflecting what is. And we don't want to pull the wool over their eyes. The more transparency, the better. That pendulum that seems to swing from the left to the right, I don't know what will happen. I don't. I mean, as far as politics, I would never consider myself a political expert. It's difficult. It's a, it's a. I think the universities are in real trouble. They're in real trouble. That's another thing Peterson's right about. I don't know how they're going to come back from it. So there's going to be big change around that. I think that this agent Hollywood is transforming. They're trying to catch up with these technologies. They're realizing that the ability to connect to that audience, that thing that's reflecting the fabric of reality has shift, shifted. I don't. You probably have an agent. If you don't, I'm sure there's agents looking at you because they're launching new departments, recognizing that this is the future and what the real ramifications of that are. I do not know what the real ramifications are of this conflict between good not politics, but right versus wrong behavior. I well, going back to the beginning of the conversation with J, there's something shifting, which is why Emma Watson came out and made those comments. Something, something's shifting for the better.
- [74:51]
Chris Williamson
Warren Smith, ladies and gentlemen. Dude, I, I appreciate you very much and I applaud you for taking something that could have been horrific and turning it into a springboard to, to make something great. So that's, that's real alchemy there. Where should people go? They want to check out all of your stuff.
- [75:07]
Warren Smith
Oh, just YouTube. Warren Smith, Secret Scholars Society yeah.
- [75:11]
Chris Williamson
Heck yeah, man. I appreciate you. If you're wanting to read more, you probably want some good books to read that are going to be easy and enjoyable and not bore you and make you feel despondent at the fact that you can only get through half a page without bowing out. And that is why I made the Modern Wisdom Reading list, a list of 100 of the best books, the most interesting, impactful and entertaining that I've ever found, fiction and non fiction, real life stories. And there's a description about why I like it and there's links to go and buy it. And it's completely free. You can get it right now by going to ChrisWillX.com books that's ChrisWillX.com books.