Loading summary
A
If you take only one thing away from today's episode, Money Rehabbers, let it be this in my not so humble opinion, Public is the best brokerage for investing in bonds, stocks, ETFs, options and even crypto. You can try it out for yourself and see why I love it so much. @Public.com MoneyRehab Public is legit, the only platform I use to buy bonds. Before public, I used to buy government bonds the hard way. Slow websites, confusing interfaces, website designs straight out of the early 2000s. Just picture where fun goes to die. That was it. And then I found Public about five years ago and I have not looked back. I can now finally buy bonds without wanting to rip my hair out. Public makes it so easy to buy bonds. Whether you're into Treasuries or corporate bonds, you can browse thousands of options right from your phone. But like I said, Public isn't just all about bonds. You can also find stocks and ETFs and they offer a high yield cash account with a 4.1% APY, which is higher than the national average. They even have retirement accounts. You can now open a traditional or Roth IRA or both right on public so your future self covered. And for a limited time you can earn a 1% match on all your IRA deposits, IRA transfers and 401k rollovers. If you want an investing experience that's both smart and simple, head to public.com money rehab one more time. Public.com moneyrehab this is a paid endorsement for Public Investing. Full disclosures and conditions can be found in the podcast description. What is your bank doing for you and how much is it costing you? That's a serious question because if they're charging you $8 a month with zero extra services, I've got to stage an intervention here. What are you paying them for anyway? To hold your money for you. You deserve better. That's what I love about Chime. There are no monthly fees, no maintenance fees. My younger self would have definitely benefited from this. It's not just the no fees thing, it's what they have to offer you too. If you set up direct deposit, you can get paid up to two days early automatically. And with qualifying direct DEP you're eligible for free overdraft up to $200 on debit card purchases and cash withdrawals. Plus they have over 47,000 fee free ATMs. So seriously, ask yourself what is your bank doing for you and just how much are they charging you to do it? And if the math isn't mathing, think about making a change. Work on your financial goals through Chime today. Open an account in just two minutes@chime.com MNN Chime feels like progress. Chime is a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services and debit card provided by the Bancorp Bank NA or Stride Bank NA members FDIC Spotney eligibility requirements and overdraft limits apply. Timing depends on submission of payment file Fees apply at out of network ATMs. Bank ranking and number of ATMs, according to U.S. news and World Report. 2023 Chime checking account required. I'm Nicole Lapin, the only financial expert you don't need a dictionary to understand it's time for some money rehab. If you got part one of my conversation with Senator Elizabeth Warren yesterday, you know that we went deep on insider trading in Congress. The current proposal that would make the system a whole lot more fair and what it means about our system if the proposal isn't passed. Well, today we're talking about the most nuanced financial issues of the current moment. We talk about trading apps like Robinhood and the line there between regulation and financial freedom. And we also talk about the new narrative that Democrats are anti business and the line between governance and free markets. There are a lot of lines here, and it's important to get into all of them. I'll also ask her about some of the most urgent headlines in American economics today. Billionaire influence, the Vibe session, how to help the 99% get ahead, and whether or not she's ready to throw her name back in the ring for president in 2028. I said this yesterday, but it bears repeating. I know we've got listeners across the political spectrum. You might not agree with everything Senator Warren says, and that's okay. But remember, this is someone who used to be a Republican who spent decades studying bankruptcy and markets and who has taken on some of the biggest names on Wall Street. And I genuinely believe her when she says she cares about the middle class and helping everyone afford the American dream. So take with that what you will. And as always, if you have any thoughts, I want to hear them. Hello@moneynewsnetwork.com now here's part two.
B
When we talk about the stress on American families, do you know one of the biggest expenses that's out there? We don't count. And that is how much are you spending on credit cards? How much are you paying on debt on student loans? How much are you paying all your debt? It's actually left out of the calculation. That's nuts. And the difference between carrying as you know, $5,000 of debt at 5% and $5,000 of debt at 36% is the difference between whether you got a shot at paying it down and whether or not you're just overwhelmed and you're going to be in debt for as far into the future as you can see.
A
You alluded to the fact that I know this all too well. I was in credit card debt myself, which is why I started this work to try to help people who might be struggling as well. And we don't learn this stuff in school, but once I got out of debt, I was really hell bent on investing and growing my wealth. You have some beef, Senator Warren, with Robin Hood? Tell me about that beef. No, no. Because you know, this idea of democratizing investing is really important. I'm first generation American. The idea of investing was brand new to me. So starting investing for the first time and seeing my money grow for me was very exciting and it should be.
B
I love, love, love this and I actually want to make a point here that a lot of folks don't always link right onto paying down debt. When you have credit card debt, I'm talking about short term debt like that. Paying down that credit card debt and savings really are kind of like two ends of the teeter totter depending on where you have to start this. When you're paying down debt, you are putting yourself in a much stronger financial position and whatever you've managed that you can take out of your daily spending so that you can pay down that debt. Yes, I give exactly the same advice. Roll straight in to investing it. Roll straight into savings it. Now, I'm also very big on consumer protection and savings. I very much believe in democratizing investment. I love the phrase you use for that. I just want to make sure everybody's following the rules and that nobody gets to hype things where there's some shenanigans going on behind the curtain so that those who are in the know get to make out really well and everybody else is paying a high price for that. That's my only concern.
A
Where is the line though between democratizing wealth opportunities and potentially regulating? So you're essentially saying that Robinhood, for example, does all sorts of pay for order flow behind the scenes, which it sounds like you're alluding to, or confetti on the app that makes it much more exciting to take on more risk. So what's the answer there? I mean, we let people drive cars even though they can get into an accident, but we have licenses and seat belts and we don't let it.
B
Everybody drive a car without brakes. We just literally don't do that. We don't let anybody get on the freeway and zoom that car up to 60 miles an hour and not have a set of brakes on it. We put regulations in place. And here's always a deal for me. Most of the regulations are not that fancy. They really are about things like make sure your customer understands fully what's going on here and a bunch of tricks and traps you just can't get to do because you're fancier and know how all the little quirks and twists work. And you can hide it. That there has to be. In the same way, you go to the grocery store, you buy stuff at the grocery store. You don't run any scientific tests on what it is, the juice you're drinking or the can of soup that you open. You don't run tests on that stuff. You count on the fact that, that there is someone out there known as your government that has run a set of tests that made sure the kitchen it was put in was clean and made sure that the chemicals they put in there, things that were going to kill you and that if they were going to put peanuts in it, that they had to put a big warning sign on it. Right. And in fact, we have. And I love that we have this, we have fights sometimes over that. And we say, whoa, you're letting them put these chemicals in this stuff? And I don't like this. This is why organic foods grew up, as a way to say, you don't have to worry about that stuff. We do that with food. Because it makes no sense to ask every person who consumes food to go run that test. I want the same basic things in place for investors. You want to sit down and make a decision between whether to drink juice or eat soup. Totally up to you. You want to make a decision whether or not to invest in clothing manufacturing or to invest in some new outfit that's going to have a new process for developing steel. Good for you. You make those decisions on whatever information you want to. But what you shouldn't have to run the tests on because you actually can't see it, is that somebody behind the curtain is charging a little off the top for this and pushing a little of that, all to make themselves richer at your expense. That's all I'm looking for.
A
So a warning label, like on cigarettes.
B
I love markets. And sometimes warning labels are the right thing, but sometimes it's. You just don't let people cheat other people. We don't let people put arsenic in soup and juice. We shouldn't let people run scams behind the curtain that the investor can't see. And it's not good enough to say, hey, there may be somebody behind the curtain running a bunch of scams. No, we should just say there are certain kind of scams you just don't get to run. Because if we play a fairly clean game, if we make sure folks are playing a fairly clean game, more people can invest and more people can invest with confidence that your only mistake you have to worry about is, oh, you decided to go with clothing instead of steel, not I trusted somebody who was stealing from me. That's the mistake. That's what the cop on the beat is there for. So you don't have to worry about that one.
A
Well, I don't think a lot of people realize how much you love markets.
B
I do.
A
And you left the Republican Party years ago because you said they stopped being the party of markets.
B
Yeah.
A
Which I think is so interesting, with more of a shift now in the Democratic Party, more to the left. Can you explain how Democrats, you believe now are more the party of the markets?
B
Oh, absolutely. I think Democrats are the party of the markets precisely for the reason we just described. Let me do antitrust law. Antitrust law, as you know, was passed more than 100 years ago. Big parts of it. And the bottom line just says you can't grow a monopoly. And if you do, even if people like you, if you are giant and start using your giganticness in order to stomp out all the little businesses, ultimately the market fails. And when I say the market fails, it's not just the monopolist can charge higher prices. It's also we actually know this, statistically they lower wages. And here comes the best part. They quit innovating. And you can actually go back through history and look at this. How many giant companies that were. Alcoa was going to be the aluminum company for the next billion years and it turned out they actually just kind of quit innovating. Boeing. Right. They just quit innovating. Right. They got big, they got to be dominant, and then they quit innovating and producing a better product. So Democrats, my favorite Lina Khan, the head of the fcc, says we're just going to enforce the already existing antitrust laws so that big tech can't stop out the competition. So that if you're an app developer, you actually will have multiple places to go to try to sell your app and that they can't demand that they get the lion's share from the app developer. If you believe in markets, you recognize that having a cop on the beat, not to pick winners and losers, not to tell you that that's a cool game and that's not a cool game. That's for others to work at. But to say you can't have one giant in the field knocking out all the small businesses and the startups, you can't have private equity move in and buy up every damn veterinary practice in the state and then triple the prices when folks come in to have their pets taken care of. You and I could use the examples on and on through this. And that to me is really pro business because it keeps the competition alive. Look now at what's happening in this Trump administration. There are two big economic moves going on right now. The first is consolidation. Just watching how many in the whole entertainment industry, right. It's just moving into one giant industry. What's that going to do? Your access to movies and sports price is going to go through the roof. They got no reason to make new stuff. Just be the giant and stomp out the competition. So part of what's happening just over the last few months since Trump has come in has been it is open season for giants to merge and become even bigger giants, for private equity to come in and do roll ups. And the other thing is to engage in practices that undermine competition, corruption. Look, if the way you get ahead in America as a big corporation is to go spend a million dollars for a dinner with Donald Trump, is to put a billion dollars into his crypto, doo dah is to offer a bribe to the head of ice. If that's how you get ahead in America, that doesn't make markets stronger and we don't get the benefits of markets. So a world in which mergers have taken off like crazy and corruption is swirling around us in ways we've never seen before is not pro market. The people who are fighting against that are Democrats. The Republicans in Congress won't even say boo about it.
A
Who do you think is actually leading the Democratic Party right now?
B
Right now I think it's everybody. And I actually think that's right at this moment. We've got 47 Democrats or independents who are with the Democrats in the United States Senate. We need every one of them all hands on deck. The the Republicans are running out of money to fund the government. We got to pass a budget by this September 30 or the government shuts down. But they're going to need some Democratic votes for that. And the Democrats have Said, look, you want our votes? Let us tell you what matters to us. You've got to roll back some of those health care cuts that you put in place in the big beautiful bill. About 15 million people are about to lose their health care coverage. Almost everyone in America who has private insurance is about to see their premiums go up because of the Republican cuts to health care. Rural hospitals around the country are literally already closing and medical research, cancer research, has just been shut down in dozens of labs around the country. All of those were ways that the Republicans wanted to save a trillion dollars so they could do more tax breaks for a handful of billionaires and billionaire corporations. And so Democrats are saying, look, we're not asking you to spend new money. We're not asking to expand health care access. What we're asking for is if you want our votes going forward right now, you've got to roll back those health care cuts. We're not even saying anything about the taxes. Just roll back the health care cuts. And right now, Donald Trump has told the Republicans, don't even talk to the Democrats.
A
So if there's not a true leader in the Democratic Party now, some say aoc, some say Gavin Newsom, what about you? Will you be running or president?
B
No, no, no. Nope. I'm really in this moment. I am in the moment when healthcare for millions and millions of Americans are on the line. I'm in this moment when Donald Trump was saying a year ago, right now, just put yourself back a year. He was out there saying over and over and over that people should vote for him because he would cut your costs on day one. Cut the cost of groceries. Right. Cut all the costs that families were experiencing on day one. Those were his words. And here we are on day 240ish. And the cost of groceries is up. The cost of utilities is up. The cost of housing is up. The cost of healthcare is already up and about to take another leap. The cost of back to school shoes is up. The cost of backpacks is up. The cost of baby strollers is up. Costs are up, up, up for families. I've spent my whole life on fighting for America's middle class and to watch now how families are so stressed financially. Billionaires doing great, even multimillionaires are doing great. But just middle class, working class families are struggling so hard and it's about to get a whole lot harder. That's the fight I'm in. And that's the fight I think right now really tells us about the direction of our country. Donald Trump and The Republicans in the Senate sure seem to want a country that just works better and better for a smaller and smaller number at the top. Or a country that really opens up opportunity and opens up markets for working people everywhere.
A
Money Rehab is a production of Money News Network. I'm your host, Nicole Lapin. Money Rehab's executive producer is Morgan Lavoy. Our researcher is Emily Holmes. Do you need some Money Rehab? And let's be honest, we all do. So email us your money questions moneyrehaboneynewsnetwork.com to potentially have your questions answered on the show or even have a one on one intervention with me. And follow us on Instagram @moneynews and tiktokoneynewsnetwork for exclusive video content. And lastly, thank you. No, seriously, thank you. Thank you for listening and for investing in yourself, which is the most important investment you can make.
Episode: Which Political Party Is Better For the Stock Market? Senator Elizabeth Warren Pt 2
Date: September 30, 2025
In this insightful episode, host Nicole Lapin continues her conversation with Senator Elizabeth Warren, diving into today’s most pressing financial and political questions. The discussion centers on the tension between regulation and financial freedom in investing, the evolving narrative that Democrats are “anti-business,” the urgent economic issues facing the American middle class, and high-stakes questions about political leadership and 2028 presidential ambitions. The candid exchange is rooted in Warren’s lifelong advocacy for the middle class and her nuanced understanding of both markets and policy.
[05:46] Warren discusses her cautious optimism towards trading apps like Robinhood:
[09:58] Lapin asks if investing apps should have “warning labels” like cigarettes.
The tone is frank, energetic, and deeply informed—Nicole is curious and relatable, while Warren delivers layered, policy-focused answers with memorable metaphors and a sense of urgency about the stakes for middle-class Americans. Both share a grounded optimism that with the right “cop on the beat,” financial markets and opportunities can work for everyone—not just the ultra-wealthy.
Perfect for listeners seeking: A clear-headed, bipartisan-spirited look at investing, real-life financial policy impacts, and big-picture economic leadership.