The Murder of Martha Moxley (Part 2)

Summary

Morbid Podcast Summary

Episode: The Murder of Martha Moxley (Part 2)

Hosts: Ash Kelley & Alaina Urquhart
Date: June 4, 2026

Main Theme & Purpose

This episode continues the deep dive into the notorious 1975 murder of Martha Moxley in Greenwich, Connecticut—an infamous cold case involving privilege, flawed investigation, and the Skakel-Kennedy family connection. Ash and Alaina break down the confusing turns in the investigation, the advances in forensic technology, the secrecy and power wielded by the Skakel family, and the ultimate failure of the justice system to deliver lasting closure.

The hosts maintain their signature balance of careful research and casual, often comedic, commentary, while respecting the gravity of the crime and its impact on Martha’s family.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

Recap and Cliffhanger (05:11–06:00)

• The hosts pick up after a cliffhanger in Part 1 involving the mysterious Sutton Report, a private document commissioned by the Skakel family and never fully released to the public.

New Alibis and Suspicious Behavior (06:00–10:00)

• Michael and Tommy Skakel change their original stories following news of DNA evidence:

  • Tommy admits to being drunk, retracts his "Abraham Lincoln project" alibi.
  • Michael presents a bizarre new alibi: he admits to climbing a tree outside Martha’s window and masturbating there (08:14).
  • This “alibi” places Michael at the crime scene.

  "He claimed he wandered around the neighborhood looking into the bedroom windows of his female neighbors... and then climbed the tree outside of Martha's window and masturbated in the tree." – Ash (07:50)

• Critique of Police Work:

  • Original timeline based on neighbors recalling when dogs barked (using barking as a marker for time of death).
  • Hosts deride this unreliable method, comparing it sarcastically to "eyewitness testimony" and noting how dogs bark for any and no reason. (10:40-12:09)

The Sutton Report, Therapy Confessions, and Power (13:19–15:53)

• The private Sutton Report uncovered confessions Michael made during therapy at the Elon School.

• Michael allegedly confessed multiple times to Martha's murder in different therapy settings, but always later recanted in some form.

• The Skakels shut down the private investigation when this came to light, relying on NDAs for secrecy.

  "Once again, it seemed that Skakel's money and power had kind of shielded his family from any responsibility..." – Ash (14:55)

• A low-level staffer, who hadn’t signed an NDA, leaked the report to writer Dominic Dunne, turning the tide.

Mark Fuhrman Enters the Case (16:10–19:53)

• Dunne provides the Sutton Report to ex-LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman, infamous from the O.J. Simpson case.
• Fuhrman seeks Martha’s mother's blessing and launches an independent investigation, but faces hostility from Greenwich PD.
• Retired detective Steve Carroll becomes Fuhrman’s ally, agreeing to revisit department failures.

A Botched Case and a Book That Changes Everything (23:15–27:01)

• Joel Lang and hosts discuss the lack of solid, physical evidence.

• The Fuhrman book, "Murder in Greenwich," names Michael Skakel directly as Martha’s killer.

• Its publication causes a stir; law enforcement disparages Fuhrman’s credibility, but it prompts a one-person grand jury—in itself an unusual event.

  "Murder in Greenwich was an immediate bestseller... but the real bombshell was that Fuhrman took the rare step of naming the person he believed was responsible for Martha's murder. That's bold. He named Michael Skakel." – Ash & Elena (25:19–25:29)

The Grand Jury & Legal Blockades (27:01–33:10)

• One-person grand jury convened, a process described as more for political insulation than necessity.
• Multiple Skakel family members and key witnesses refuse to testify; legal wrangling over attorney-client and doctor-patient privilege ensues.
• Statements made by Michael at Elon declared inadmissible, but the grand jury proceeds to indict Michael Skakel regardless.

Arrest, Trial, and Aftermath (34:46–47:07)

• Michael is arrested and released on bond, then arraigned in juvenile court before his case is moved to adult court.
• The prosecution’s star witness (ex-Elon student Gregory Coleman) dies before trial, but his deposition is allowed in evidence.
• The trial draws media and Kennedy family presence.
• Prosecution theory: Michael killed Martha after she rebuffed his advances.
• Defense frames the case as built on rumors, shaky police work, and, in closing, offers the minimalist: "He didn’t do it. He doesn’t know who did. He wasn’t there..."

Verdict, Appeals, and Systemic Frustration (47:12–56:29)

• Jury finds Michael Skakel guilty on June 8 (Elena's birthday, amusingly noted) (47:12–47:16).
• Judge heavily critiques Michael’s lack of remorse and sentences him to 20 years to life.
• Decade-long appeals begin, including claims of constitutional violations and ineffective assistance of counsel.
• 2013: conviction overturned for ineffective counsel; 2016: conviction reinstated; 2018: conviction overturned again.

Ultimate Non-Resolution (54:36–56:29)

• In 2021, prosecutors decline to retry Skakel, doubting they can secure a conviction given witness deaths and time elapsed.

• Skakel is not declared innocent—just not retried.

  “So he was never necessarily proven innocent. They were just like, 'We think you did this, but we can't prove it.'” – Elena (54:56)

• Dorothy Moxley’s dignified reaction: pride in the efforts for justice, though without true closure.

• Dorothy Moxley passes away in 2024, with the case formally inactive and technically unsolved.

Reflections & Epilogue (56:29–59:45)

• Martha’s murder is officially unsolved and the investigation inactive.

• Persistent frustration: the Skakel family's power, flawed police investigation, crucial evidence missing, and the suffering of Martha’s loved ones.

  “Regardless... Michael Skakel was convicted... got a new trial... and was freed. That’s just the facts. No more compelling evidence has come forward... It would be nice... just for Martha’s family... if it was solved.” – Ash (56:59)

Notable Quotes & Moments

• On Michael Skakel's bizarre alibi:

  “His alibi is that he was masturbating outside her bedroom window... Not out here saying it’s a good thing, but technically it’s an alibi.” – Ash & Elena (09:17)

• On police reliance on barking dogs:

  “They’re barking at their own farts. So we’re using them as a forensic tool now?” – Ash (11:54)

• On enormous privilege:

  “Once again, it seemed that Skakel’s money and power had kind of shielded his family from any responsibility.” – Ash (14:55)

• On mother’s pain:

  “The fact that he did [call Dorothy Moxley] and said, ‘I can feel your pain’– No, you can’t.” – Elena (35:36)

• On the maddening legal rollercoaster:

  “From the moment he was arrested... everyone... watched and waited to see how Michael Skakel’s wealth and power would possibly help him... that proved ineffective... then effective again...” – Ash (52:08–52:19)

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• Intro/Cliffhanger recap: 05:11
• The Sutton Report and the new alibis: 06:00–10:00
• Police work critique and dog barking evidence: 10:40–12:09
• Therapy confessions & Skakel privilege: 13:19–15:53
• The report leak and Mark Fuhrman’s entry: 16:10–19:53
• Book publication and grand jury: 23:15–27:01
• Refusal to testify and witness privilege: 27:01–33:10
• Arrest and trial details: 34:46–47:12
• Verdict and sentencing: 47:12–47:47
• Appeals and legal reversals: 47:47–56:29
• Case declared inactive, Dorothy Moxley dies, reflections: 56:29–59:45

---

Tone

Diligent, irreverent, occasionally dark-humored, but always respectful of Martha Moxley and her family’s suffering. The hosts use sarcasm and banter to highlight the absurdities and injustices in the case while retaining sincerity regarding the tragic loss and lasting impact.

---

Final Thoughts & Memorable Moments

• Case demonstrates how wealth and influence can distort justice for decades.

• Martha’s murder remains technically unsolved—highlighting the pain of cold cases.

  “A cold case is never cold.” – Elena (58:48)

• The episode ends (as always) with a palate-cleansing fun fact about baby elephants for comfort (60:23).

---

This episode is essential for anyone wanting to understand the Martha Moxley case, its infamous labyrinth of privilege, botched police work, legal twists, and enduring lack of closure.

Transcript

[Elena]

Cape Fear is a new series streaming June 5th on Apple TV. This 10 episode mystery thriller is executive produced by Martin Scorsese and stars Academy Award winner Javier Bardem, Academy Award nominee Amy Adams and Emmy nominee Patrick Wilson. A storm is coming for happily married attorneys Anna and Tom Bowden when Max Katie, the notorious killer they're responsible for putting behind bars, is let out of prison and he wants vengeance.

[Ad Read Announcer]

Every good detective needs a partner to support them on important cases. Think of a State Farm agent like your sidekick, there to help you along the way in your search for coverage. State Farm can help you choose the coverage you need, whether it's for your home, car, boat or even rv. With so many options, it's nice knowing you have help finding what fits for you so you can get back to solving all of life's bigger cases. Go to statefarm.com or use the award winning app to connect with a local agent and get a quote. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is

[Ad Read Announcer 2]

there avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes so you don't have to don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is. With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. There are download today.

[Ad Read Announcer]

Hey weirdos.

[Elena]

I'm Ash. And I'm Elena and this is morbid.

[Ash]

This is morbid. Morbid in the afternoon and I'm trying to think of I saw cuz like last time I think we were like okay set your timers because we're about to start the episode. I saw some funny ass people being like it starts at 69 seconds so like it starts at 0.03 seconds so

[Elena]

now you're never gonna know when it starts.

[Ash]

So I think you guys are funny.

[Elena]

You guys are funny.

[Ash]

But I don't think we have a ton of business, just some the normal stuff. If you guys haven't bought tickets to the live show at Radio City, what do you do? 27th buy tickets to it because I'm telling you it's going to be a blast. We, we've really nailed some stuff down. Yep.

[Elena]

We're reeling it in.

[Ash]

It's going to be fun. We have some fun merch.

[Elena]

Yes.

[Ash]

We have a special guest and it's just going to be a really fun time.

[Elena]

Special fits from Romania.

[Ash]

Yeah, literally. So get your butt there and then

[Elena]

you can just wander around New York.

[Ash]

Yeah. All night. Actually, don't. Because I've been. I mean, you shouldn't anyway.

[Elena]

But yeah, I was always just a joke to begin with.

[Ash]

I keep seeing these reports on the news the last couple days.

[Elena]

I don't watch the news.

[Ash]

People, like, they're getting film of, like, in the middle of the night. People are just going into manholes. And then some people are, like, crawling out of manholes. It's just like a group of men.

[Elena]

What?

[Ash]

Who? And they don't know what they're doing.

[Elena]

Are they the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles? Turtles.

[Ash]

That's the running joke.

[Elena]

That's the general consensus.

[Ash]

But that's very dangerous. Like, don't do that.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Like, if you're one of those people, stop doing that.

[Elena]

Also, like, emerging from a manhole. You could get Thackeray banked real quick.

[Ash]

Absolutely. That's crazy. I'm saying.

[Elena]

And also, like, you're going into the sewers.

[Ash]

That's what I'm saying. Nobody knows what they're doing. Nobody really knows what the situation is. It's been a couple nights of them, like, seeing these videos.

[Elena]

I really hate that.

[Ash]

So there. So that's going on. Yeah. That's spooky. That's something. That's pretty spooky. So don't do that. But also on a totally different note, what you should do is pre order the Butcher Legacy.

[Elena]

Honestly, it's not even that much different of a note. Because your book has some weird shit going on.

[Ash]

Exactly. So this. There's that. And also, I don't know if you've noticed, some of you have. I'm doing a little series, like a video series. I'm trying my hand at it. It's a lot of work. I don't know how to put these videos together. Anybody who puts videos together and edits and does all this stuff all by

[Elena]

themselves, Influencers in the wild. Props to you. You have a tough job.

[Ash]

Props to you for being able to edit a video. Because it's hard. It is hard, but. Yeah. So I'm doing a little video series where I'm going to go through the chapters of the Butcher Legacy and give you a little sneak peek of every chapter. A little. Kind of like Easter eggs.

[Elena]

Yeah, Easter eggs. Exactly.

[Ash]

So keep a lookout for those. I'm putting them on TikTok and Instagram. I think a couple of people might have thought it had to do with the slicer game that Morbid is doing with Hunt A Killer. Those are two different things. In case you were confused.

[Elena]

So these are not like game pieces or anything like that. We'll do another video.

[Ash]

Yeah, for sure. So these are. Just keep a lookout for them. I'm calling them the Evidence Recovery Series. So keep an eye out.

[Elena]

I love it. It's so fun. It was a very good idea.

[Ash]

It's been a really fun thing to do. And I'm trying to think if we have any other business.

[Elena]

I think it starts now.

[Ash]

I think it starts. Oh, wait. Also pre order the Salem Slicer if you want that game. The game is so much fun.

[Elena]

It's incredible.

[Ash]

Yeah, it's really fun.

[Elena]

A lot of people are getting theirs in the mail, like the ones that we sent out. And like, our friends and family are so excited.

[Ash]

I'm so excited to see everybody get them. But, yeah, I think that's it.

[Elena]

Okay, it starts now.

[Ash]

Now.

[Elena]

All right. Carl, stop your timer.

[Ash]

All right. Starts now. All right. So when we last left you guys.

[Elena]

Yeah, you left us on a fucking cliffhanger.

[Ash]

I sure did. Because I talked about the Sutton report that was put together, that was never made public, only bits and pieces or whatever.

[Elena]

Yeah, I think that's the weirdest thing ever.

[Ash]

But one of the things that did come out from it was that Tommy Skakel lied about his whereabouts or. Or more his actions that night. Yeah, because remember, he said he just like went inside and started a project that didn't exist on Abraham Lincoln that was proved to not exist.

[Elena]

And the teachers were like, nobody gave them that.

[Ash]

But what else came out in this report was some stuff about Michael Skakel.

[Elena]

Interesting. I didn't see that coming when you said that. I said qua.

[Ash]

Yeah, it's pretty crazy. Now, as private investigators were digging into the Martha Moxley case, the state's attorney was doing their best to keep the press and the, you know, in the loop with regard to the newly reopened investigation. Among other things, John Solomon was eager to employ the latest technology in DNA, because obviously that's coming out that feels like it's going to open a million doors.

[Elena]

Yeah, that's huge.

[Ash]

They hope that was going to identify the suspect, like, bar none. The news that they might soon be able to identify the killer did prompt both Tommy and Michael Skakel to have a change of heart with their initial stories. Oh, so that. So the word comes out like, hey, maybe we could identify someone. Like, we have DNA. We have this Sutton report. They were like, actually, we'd love to tell you what we were actually doing that night.

[Elena]

Alrighty.

[Ash]

And they did admit to police that they lied about the night of the murder. And they would like to offer new alibis. Okay. Which obviously, in and of itself does not identify them as murders.

[Elena]

It just doesn't look good.

[Ash]

Cause unfortunately, they were teenagers at the time, so you have to look at it like that. In Tommy's case, the alibi was more or less similar to what he had offered the first time he was interviewed. But he dropped the story about doing the project that didn't exist.

[Elena]

The teachers were like, bud, you really gotta stop this because we have no proof of that.

[Ash]

You're not doing a project on Abraham Lincoln. It's just not doing. But he copped to being drunk at the time, okay? Because remember, they were young. They were like 15 years old at this point. Young. Michael's new alibi, on the other hand, was surprising because he had said he

[Elena]

was at another cousin's house.

[Ash]

Right? Yeah. So like you just said, according to Michael, he returned from his Cousin's house around 11pm, remember? But he didn't go to bed as he had previously stated. Okay. Before he said he got home around 11pm and he just went to bed.

[Elena]

I thought that was a little cray cray, because, like, these kids all like to have a lot of fun and go around, you know?

[Ash]

Now, this is a little shocking, okay, what he did. He brought this forward, okay. Instead, he claimed he wandered around the neighborhood looking into the bedroom windows of his female neighbors. Oh. Until. That's not even the shocking part. Oh. Until he returned home and climbed the tree outside of Martha's window and masturbated in the tree.

[Elena]

Oh. What the actual fuck?

[Ash]

Yeah.

[Elena]

He just told investigators that.

[Ash]

Yeah, he said, that's what I was actually doing.

[Elena]

And what'd they do when they heard that?

[Ash]

I mean, I wasn't there, so I don't know what their exact reactions were.

[Elena]

How'd they proceed?

[Ash]

I. I imagine they said, oh, yeah. Oh, the. So what made his new alibi so surprising wasn't just that it outed him as a teenage peeping Tom and a public masturbator. Like, those are pretty.

[Elena]

That's a big deal.

[Ash]

Like, that's. That's a lot.

[Elena]

But not a public masturbator.

[Ash]

I think the more. What's crazy is the more shocking thing was that he essentially placed himself at the scene of the crime scene.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Making himself now not his brother Tommy, the last person to maybe see Martha alive. Okay. The new alibi wasn't just a bizarre twist.

[Elena]

I'm also like, dave, that's just not even an alibi. No, you can't call that an alibi.

[Ash]

I guess it. I mean, it is because it doesn't prove he murdered her.

[Elena]

His alibi is that he was masturbating outside her bedroom window.

[Ash]

I'm not out here saying it's a good thing to be doing, but technically it's an alibi. You're telling them where you were. But. And it doesn't obviously make him, just from that. A murderer? No, just a creep. Just a creep. But what the bigger problem there is, like, they were saying he placed himself at the scene of the crime, essentially. So it's like. That's what makes it more like. Huh. Like, sure, that's an alibi, but it's not a good alibi.

[Elena]

You're off the scene of the crime.

[Ash]

Yeah. It also called into question the original timeline, and it raised new questions about the reliability of the original investigation, which was already. Yeah.

[Elena]

Pretty shaky.

[Ash]

Now, within days of the murder, investigators had ruled Michael Skakel out as a suspect. That was in the beginning. Based on the fact that he was confirmed to have been at his cousin's house when they thought the murder occurred around 10:00pm okay. He was. They. The cousins were like, yep, he was there. Yeah. But the only reason this is wild to me. The only reason investigators believe the murder occurred at 10pm was not based on medical examiner evidence. Oh, like it should be.

[Elena]

Yep.

[Ash]

They were basing it on reports from neighbors about the agitated barking dogs in the neighborhood that were barking at 10pm

[Elena]

gotta be kidding me.

[Ash]

Yeah, you. That space.

[Elena]

That's the same as, like, eyewitness testimony. Like, that's never. That's not that reliable. And it's actually even worse.

[Ash]

I was just gonna say that. Place that on the same level as eyewitness testimony. You're literally saying animals made noises at a time one night, so someone must have been being murdered.

[Elena]

And you're relying on people's memory of what time that was, which, like, again, people have shaky memories.

[Ash]

And just the fact that dogs bark. Yeah, dogs bark. My dog barks for no fucking reason. For sometimes my dog barks. Sometimes when they see their own reflection in the window.

[Elena]

Yup.

[Ash]

My dog barks at my other dog when my other dog is laying down and she wants to play.

[Elena]

Yup.

[Ash]

My dog barks sometimes when they bark.

[Elena]

My dog.

[Ash]

Yeah.

[Elena]

My dog barks when she farts, too.

[Ash]

Sometimes it upsets them. Or the other one barks when the other one farts. Dolores.

[Elena]

When she farts, she. She chases her butt and barks, and I'm like, that was you?

[Ash]

That was you.

[Elena]

It's almost like, she's, like, mad at her butt for betraying her.

[Ash]

That's the thing.

[Elena]

Like, dogs are awesome.

[Ash]

Yeah, dogs are awesome, but they're gonna

[Elena]

do wily shit for no reason.

[Ash]

They're barking at their own farts. So it's like we're using them as a forensic tool now. Like, when did that happen?

[Elena]

Yeah, they're not canine dogs, babe.

[Ash]

That's insane to me to be like, well, dogs barked around 10pm so that was obviously when the murder happened. It's like, nope, I think they were just barking.

[Elena]

And again, like, naughty. Take the dogs out of it. You're relying on the neighbor saying what time that happened. That's no good.

[Ash]

What's even worse with this is the medical examiner had never really agreed with investigators, stated time of death, and they're all.

[Elena]

They're the expert, I would say, on this medical examiner.

[Ash]

Yeah. They got the actual bio. Physiological evidence that shows that this is when they had actually placed Martha's time of death anywhere between 9:30pm and 5am

[Elena]

That's a big window.

[Ash]

It was only because investigators believed the local dogs to be more reliable than the medical examiner, essentially. Are you shitting me? That they were able to rule Michael Skakel out in the first place. That was the only reason he was ruled out.

[Elena]

That is so.

[Ash]

Because he had an alibi for when the dogs were barking. That's not when the medical examiner is saying it could have occurred.

[Ad Read Announcer]

That's crazy.

[Ash]

Yeah. Also, now that he'd admitted to trying to watch Martha through her window after he'd returned from his cousin's home, Michael hadn't just ruled himself back in as a suspect. He'd effectively moved himself to the top of the list. Yeah.

[Elena]

You're masturbating outside of her window and

[Ash]

he's at the scene.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

That's. She was 200ft from her house. Right. Like, you're there.

[Elena]

Yep.

[Ash]

Now, although no one outside Sutton Associates knew it at the time, there was a lot more that made Michael Skakel a strong suspect than just a bizarre new alibi.

[Elena]

And this was. The Sutton report was like. Like their family hired that law group. So this is interesting.

[Ash]

Yeah. According to the Sutton report, because remember, we got little bits and pieces of it.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Not the whole thing at the quote. At the very least, it is fair to say Michael Skakel has, for whatever reason, often acted out in certain ways to arouse suspicion. Reportedly, Michael once even confessed to the murder of Martha Moxley in a therapy session while a patient at the Elon Treatment Center. Oh, fuck. In fact, While he was at the Elon School, Michael confessed multiple times to murdering Martha Moxley in both group therapy settings and in private conversations. Okay. Although he would later recant at least one of those confessions in an email correspondence with one of the other students at Elon, the discovery of that information would have been damning if it had been made public, and it wasn't at the time.

[Elena]

That's so tough. I know of, like, therapy.

[Ash]

Yeah, you have to be careful with that stuff. When he was informed of his son's confession at the Elon School, Rushton Skakel immediately pulled the plug on the entire investigation, paying any remaining fees and ending multiple years of work. Huh. Since everyone involved in the private investigation had signed a confidentiality agreement. I wish you guys could see my

[Elena]

face right now, because my face is saying, what?

[Ash]

What? Well, all the people involved in the private investigation had signed a confidentiality agreement, so they were all prohibited from disclosing any information contained in the report to law enforcement or to the public. An NDA brother. Once again, it seemed that Skakel's money and power had kind of shielded his family from any responsibility. But there was one thing he hadn't counted on.

[Elena]

Stop. What?

[Ash]

It was true that every investigator on the case had signed a confidentiality agreement, but. But the young employees who'd been tasked with organizing the information for the investigators had not been required to sign anything. When that young man, one young man

[Elena]

who shall not be named, he has

[Ash]

remained anonymous, learned that the report and Skakel's confession to murder were being shelved and would not see the light of day, he stole the report and sent it to Dominic Dunne.

[Elena]

Not all heroes were capes.

[Ash]

Because he had seen Dominic Dunne talking about the case on the news, and he was like, I think you should have this.

[Elena]

Wow. That's always, like, my favorite part of a story when one person is just like, I think you should look at this.

[Ash]

I love when one person just is like. Dominic Dunne had built a respectable career for himself as a writer covering crime. But he also wasn't exactly an investigative journalist at the time, like which he

[Elena]

actually shifted a lot after the murder

[Ash]

of his daughter, which is what was required if the Sutton report was going to be put to good use. You need an investigative journalist of some sort. So rather than pursue the story himself, Dunn forwarded the report to former Los Angeles police detective turned authority Mark Fuhrman, whom Dunn didn't know personally, but he respected the work he had done.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

Now, although he would eventually make a name for himself as an author and journalist, Fuhrman first became a household name. Some people might be like, wait a

[Elena]

minute, the name sounded familiar.

[Ash]

He was. He became a household name across America during the O.J. simpson trial.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

In 1994, he was an LAPD detective, and he investigated the murder of Simpson's wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ron Goldman, and was the investigator who found the notorious bloody glove.

[Elena]

Oh, shit.

[Ash]

During the trial, though, several witnesses for the defense testified that Fuhrman had previously made racist statements in their presence, leading the defense to charge that Fuhrman had tampered with evidence in order to obtain a conviction. Ah. Despite there being no evidence to suggest the glove had been planted by anyone, the controversy in documentation of, you know, his past, essentially the. The remarks he had made, it made him a pariah everywhere, like in law enforcement, you know. He retired in 1995. The next day, the next day, the very next day, the next year. And he did write Murder in Brentwood about the Simpson murder in the trial. Oh, okay. Murder in Brentwood had really impressed Dominic Dunn. And so when he came across the Sutton Report, Fuhrman was the first person that came to Dunn's mind, because he was like, he knows how to do this shit. Yeah. Now, after reading the Sutton Report, Fuhrman placed a call to Dorothy Moxley, who by then had moved to New Jersey to live near her son. Okay. Unlike Dunn, who'd written a fictional account of the case, Fuhrman wanted to write a nonfiction account and not only intended to emphasize the countless mistakes made by law enforcement, but he also wanted to identify Martha's killer. Good. He later said. I felt like I had a heavy burden on my shoulders. I just told this woman who's been waiting 23 years for some solution I to her daughter's homicide, that I could solve it. So I had no choice then. I actually had to go out and solve it now with Dorothy's consent.

[Elena]

It's a lot to task yourself with.

[Ash]

Now, with Dorothy's consent, Fuhrman got to work digging into the case, but immediately ran into problems when word of his intentions reached the local police. Sensing that Fuhrman was planning to smear them in the investigation with his book, Fuhrman was shut out by local law enforcement and claims he. He claims that he was threatened with arrest if he went near any residence of Belhaven. Allegedly. Allegedly. That's what is claimed. Fortunately, he soon found an ally in retired Greenwich detective Steve Carroll, the original lead on the Moxley case.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

He later said his absence of ego at not being able to solve this case was a great contribution because he admitted things that I think other detectives wouldn't have. Okay. Which is, like, really impressive that Steve, Carol.

[Elena]

Steve, Carol.

[Ash]

I like that he said his lack of ego at not being able to solve this case. Like, he didn't go into this being like, whatever, we did all we could and this isn't my fault. Like, he was like, no, I think we fucked up along the way and that's been solved.

[Elena]

You have to be willing to admit fault.

[Ash]

Yeah. Once Dorothy Moxley gave her consent for Carol to speak with FMAN, the former detective became FMAN's greatest asset as he attempted to navigate a community that was very vocally opposed to his presence. Foreign.

[Elena]

Can feel overwhelming. It's like, do I need a new mattress? Do I need to check this tracker that I'm on? Should I be taking this supplement? Oh, my God. I think I need blackout curtains.

[Ash]

Whoa.

[Elena]

It's overwhelming. Upgrade your sleep by upgrading your bedding, though with bowl and branch, it's simple. Signature sateen sheets, breathable pillows, cozy waffle bed blankets. I freaking love a waffle bed blanket. And beautifully crafted comforters work together for comfort and temperature reg regulation. No complicated setup required, no new routines. Just a bed with bowl and branch bedding that feels softer, more breathable, and way more inviting. Start with the signature sheet set, then add the comforter or the waffle blanket to finish the bed. I personally love how the waffle blanket looks and it's so cozy. Cozy, cozy. I. I really have a hard time with sheets until I found bowl and branch. I don't know if you guys have had this problem before. It's like three o' clock in the morning, you roll over and your fitted sheet comes with you and it drives you insane. Not with bowl and branch, honey. Ever since I got bowl and branch, my sheets stay where they're supposed to. My waffle blanket is covered, cozifying me and my temperature is regulated. I love it. Upgrade your sleep with bowl and branch. Get 15% off your first order plus free shipping atbowl and branch.commorbid with code morbid. That's bowl and Branch. B O l l a n-d branch.com morbid code morbid to unlock 15% off exclusions app.

[Ad Read Announcer]

This is a paid ad by BetterHelp. There have been times in my life where I have been work, work, work and nothing else, but that simply doesn't work for me. So I feel like the older I've gotten, I've really gotten much better at taking a step back, being able to prioritize a work life balance that works for me. Not everybody thrives when life gets busy. You might catch yourself feeling drained even during things that you usually enjoy, or realize that you've been pushing yourself more than you need to. It's important to take care of yourself when things get busy by resting, recharging, and saying no when you need to. Therapy can also be a great way to get out of autopilot and get a solid reset. Therapy with better help may help you understand your needs, feel more confident setting boundaries, and create a rhythm that feels sustainable. BetterHelp is the world's largest online therapy platform. Just take a short questionnaire to identify your needs and Preferences and BetterHelp will handle the initial therapist matching work for you. You can also feel confident knowing that BetterHelp therapists work according to a strict code of conduct and are fully qualified. Take a pause with therapy, better help can help life feel manageable again. Sign up and get 10% off at betterhelp.commorbid that's betterhelp h e l p.commorbid Chilling crime cases are mysterious, but finding coverage shouldn't be. With the State Farm Personal Price Plan, you have options and can personalize your plan to to help create an affordable price so you can get back to cracking all of life's bigger cases. Talk to a State Farm agent today to learn how you can choose to bundle and save with the personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Head to state farm.com to get a quote. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer, availability, amount of discounts and savings and eligibility vary by state.

[Ash]

Now the problem with the Moxley case is that regardless of how many mistakes were made in the investigation, the fact remained that there also was little for investigators to go like work with here. Journalist Joel Lang wrote, as damning as the evidence may seem, it proves little anyone might have and this is true. You have to look at at first. When you first look at this, you say, oh my God, how could it? How could you not? And it's true. It's. It looks damning. It does. When you really pull apart the pieces though, you go, well, you have to think of every part of this because

[Elena]

anybody could have taken the anyone might

[Ash]

have dropped the club outside and anyone might have picked it up. Who knows if one of them had just had the club, dropped it outside somewhere, someone found it, somebody stumbled upon it. No one the police interviewed said that they saw Tommy with the golf club. Okay, so there's Just that. And I'm just. Just from, like, a purely, like, sure perspective. You know what I mean? Like, sure, somebody. Is it likely? I don't know. Yeah. You know, like, it's just. But you have to think of these things. Too bad they weren't able to get

[Elena]

any prints off of it.

[Ash]

I know, but I don't know. Maybe somebody was wearing gloves. Who knows? Maybe now. In fact, even with all the circumstantial evidence pointing towards the Skakel house, investigators still had the wrong person as their prime suspect in the case. Of course, the only people who knew that were contractually bound to secrecy because, remember, they were going after Tommy. Right. But Furman may have had the one piece of evidence that would break the case wide open and finally shed light on the identity of Martha's killer.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

In the spring of 1998, Fuhrman's book, Murder in Greenwich, who Killed Martha Moxley? Was published, much to the consternation and very much to the ire of the investigators at the Greenwich Police Department and in the State's Attorney's office. In the book, Fuhrman laid out the facts as they were known, paying particular attention to the myriad of mistakes made by investigators and asserts the widely accepted theory that a wealthy and powerful family had stymied the investigation from the start.

[Elena]

That's a good book. Stymied.

[Ash]

But the real bombshell was that Fuhrman took the rare step of naming the person he believed was responsible for Martha's murder. That's bold. He named Michael Skakel.

[Elena]

Interesting. You gotta be. You gotta have balls to do that,

[Ash]

because

[Elena]

for so many reasons.

[Ash]

Yeah. Murder in Greenwich was an immediate bestseller. And it also attracted scathing criticism.

[Elena]

Sure.

[Ash]

Particularly from those Furman sought to undermine with the book, like Frank Garr, a former Greenwich detective who was working for the state at the time the book was published. Said Fuhrman has the luxury of not having to back up anything he says. So he can name anybody he wants, and he can say anything he wants in that book. Which I was like, technically, you can't.

[Elena]

No, not if he doesn't want to be sued, I was gonna say.

[Ash]

But Greenwich Police Chief Peter Robbins shared a similar sentiment about the work. Telling a reporter his real intent was to make money. I don't think he was necessarily attempting to solve a crime. Like, damn, okay. So. Relying heavily on the Sutton report and interviews conducted with Michael Skakel's classmates at the Elon School, Fuhrman laid out a very plausible case against Skakel, while also exposing how the case had been so Badly botched by investigators in the first place. Furman told a reporter, I can find very little they did correctly in the investigation. I don't want to be smug or arrogant about this, but I obviously know much more than they do.

[Elena]

Dang.

[Ash]

Now, on June 18, just one month after the publication of his book, Connecticut's chief court administrator, Aaron Ment, announced that a one person grand jury comprised of Superior Court Justice George Th Was being called upon to review the evidence against Michael Skakel.

[Elena]

Never in my life have I heard of a one person grand jury.

[Ash]

That's the. And also. Oh, so suddenly, yeah, everybody doesn't like this book.

[Elena]

And they think, like, everybody thinks the

[Ash]

book is a bunch a crock of shit, and all of a sudden they're

[Elena]

like a load of more.

[Ash]

Larry, bring him in front of a grand jury. It's like, wait, yeah, which one is it?

[Elena]

Make that make sense.

[Ash]

Like, interesting. Now, the announcement of the grand jury came as a surprise not only because, like you said, it consisted of one man, but also because it doesn't seem.

[Elena]

You know what I mean?

[Ash]

I don't know who George is, but he's got to be really.

[Elena]

I'm sure he's grand. Like, I'm sure he's a great guy, but.

[Ash]

But also because Connecticut does not require a grand jury before felony charges can be filed. Oh. According to Connecticut lawyer Norman Pattis, grand juries in Connecticut are only used for political purposes. Having a grand jury provides insulation for a prosecutor in a politically sensitive case because the decision to indict is made by a panel of anonymous citizens.

[Elena]

Or just one, or just George, or just Grandmaster George. Also. I was like, I'm sure he's a great guy. I really went on a limb there.

[Ash]

Yeah.

[Elena]

Who knows who. I don't know George, that he's a

[Ash]

great guy, but I don't know him.

[Elena]

As a gal. You can never say you're sure a man is great. No.

[Ash]

So I just.

[Elena]

I'd like to recant that.

[Ash]

I stay over here saying, I don't know, George.

[Elena]

Yes.

[Ash]

I don't know.

[Elena]

I hope that he's great is what I should have said.

[Ash]

So another way of saying all this is, in other words, the district attorney can't be blamed if the accused. This isn't indicted because it was the grand jury that made the decision, not the prosecutor. All right, so it's just to keep them from the. I didn't do it. To anyone who had been following this case, it looked like whether investigators liked it or not, the publication of Murder in Greenwich had managed to break the case somewhat.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Like at least move something along. Right. But when he was asked about the matter, Detective Frank Gar dismissed the suggestion that the book had anything to do with the filing.

[Elena]

So then what?

[Ash]

He said, we've talked to hundreds of people and gathered some information that was previously unknown. So we reached a point where having a grand jury was an option. The books added interest to the public and the media, but they had no impact on the investigation.

[Elena]

Was it like public pressure after people read the book?

[Ash]

Whatever you say. Yeah. Okay, sure. For decades, Martha Moxley's friends and family had desperately sought answers to her remember, brutal murder. But we're just again, stymied since you like that word period. They're stymied at every turn.

[Elena]

Yep.

[Ash]

Now, after more than 20 years, it looked like Martha might finally get the justice that she deserves. Of course, nothing in this case is straightforward at all. No. And there was no reason to believe that would change. Oh, Lisa, really? Just. Yeah.

[Elena]

Well.

[Ash]

And least of all because of the publication of this book, you know? Yeah. So on July 12, 1998, the one man grand jury proceeding George. It began in Bridgeport, where Justice George Thim began hearing testimony and reviewing the evidence in the case. Among those seated in the gallery were Dorothy and John Moxley, who were accompanied by former Greenwich detective Daniel Hickman. Hickman told a reporter, I'm very glad we're doing this. Glad we're investigating this matter a little further. I hope something comes good comes out of this for the sake of the family and the community. Yeah. Given the number of times the Skakel family had kind of thwarted investigators attempts to get answers into the Moxley case, it should come as no surprise that the grand jury hearing was pretty similarly frustrating. And it ultimately dragged on for 18 months. Wow.

[Elena]

Holy shit.

[Ash]

During that time, the majority of the Skakel family members who were expected to testify publicly stated their intent to skip the hearing.

[Elena]

Is that allowed?

[Ash]

I guess. Rushton Skakel was particularly adamant in his refusal, telling reporters, I wasn't there personally hunting when the slaying happened. So he saw no reason why he should be there.

[Elena]

Okay. I wonder, I don't know if I'm just like making this up, but I wonder if you could be held in contempt of court for not showing up to testify when you're called upon. I would think so.

[Ash]

I looked at Debbie's just like, shrugging

[Elena]

and being like, yeah, usually. Right.

[Ash]

Like you would think. I would think you would think.

[Elena]

Yeah. That's typical.

[Ash]

It's interesting.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Okay. But others who refused to testify or Otherwise attempted to stonewall the prosecution, including Sutton Associates, Detective Willis Krebs, and Elon School owner Joseph Ricci. Okay. Krebs cited attorney client privilege as his reason for not divulging the names of those interviewed during the investigation.

[Elena]

I mean, that makes sense, I guess,

[Ash]

but the judge rejected the claim, and it doesn't.

[Elena]

It doesn't make sense.

[Ash]

The judge rejected the claim, and Krebs was compelled to release the names. Ricci's refusal, on the other hand, proved a more challenging matter because he's the Elon School. In his case. In his case, he cited doctor patient confidentiality as his reason for declining to testify or release information about Michael's time

[Elena]

at Elon, which that's a lot more unlike.

[Ash]

Yeah. Unlike Skakel's contract with Sutton, the mutually assured privacy between a doctor and their patient is taken very seriously in the legal system.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Skakel's lawyer, David Grudberg, said it completely undercuts that privilege if you can change the rules after the fact. In response, the prosecution argued that the confession, quote, had nothing to do with Skakel's treatment or any illness, therefore should not be privileged information.

[Elena]

Which I can get that.

[Ash]

Which, if you're saying he was talking in private conversations with, like, fellow students, I would think, yeah. That wouldn't have anything to do with his treatment. Deb. Deb has just informed us that she's not positive, but she said because she doesn't know Connecticut law. But she's.

[Elena]

She only knows Mass Law.

[Ash]

There is the possibility that Rushton Skakel, especially, being the father, would not be compelled to testify because of, like, the parent child. It's kind of like a spousal.

[Elena]

It's privilege. Yeah.

[Ash]

So that makes sense, I suppose.

[Elena]

Yeah. No, I could see that. I'm interested, though, because obviously it was more than him that refused. So I'm like, what did everybody else say?

[Ash]

Yeah. Now, again, they're saying. They're claiming that his confessions, Michael's confessions, had nothing to do with his treatment.

[Elena]

So that's why they should be allowed

[Ash]

to have the doctor testify. Ultimately, the judge sided with the defense, and any statements Michael made while at Elon were deemed inadmissible. Why is that? Hard to say.

[Elena]

Interesting.

[Ash]

Yeah. Finally, in January 2000, the grand jury ruled that even without the incriminating statements made at Elon, there was sufficient evidence to charge Michael Skakel with the murder of Martha Moxley. That's without the confession.

[Elena]

I was just going to say, okay, so then what's the evidence?

[Ash]

But in an odd twist, this is the twistiest.

[Elena]

Case.

[Ash]

The arrest warrant in any associated documentation related to the case would not list Skakel by name, as he was a juvenile when the murder was committed.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

In response to news of the indictment, Skakel's lawyer, Michael Sherman told reporters, if he's arrested, he's going to plead not guilty, come to court, and we'll go to trial. He's innocent. He has nothing to do with this murder. This is not a case that will result in a plea bargain. Okay. Now, as expected, on January 20, an arrest warrant was issued for Michael Skakel, who surrendered at the Greenwich Police Department that afternoon, where he spent roughly 30 minutes before being released on $500,000 of bond. Yeah, I. That's shocking for those who'd lived in Greenwich since the murder occurred. It was a moment they never thought would come. Belhaven resident Martha McEntry said, A lot of people would like to see closure. If an arrest is heading towards that, then I think that's a relief for everyone. Yeah. The arrest was followed by the usual cries of innocence from, you know, Skakel's lawyer, Michael Sherman. But Skakel himself seemed interested only in protesting the arrest directly to Doroth Moxley herself.

[Elena]

Oh.

[Ash]

With Sherman's encouragement, allegedly his lawyer. Yeah. Michael reached out to Dorothy, much to her surprise and disappointment. She later said, what he said to me was, dorothy, I feel your pain, but you've got the wrong guy. And she says, I was incensed that he would call me Dorothy. I'm sorry, but I do believe I deserve some more respect than that. He should have called me Mrs. Moxley and he shouldn't have talked to me. It wasn't the right thing to do.

[Elena]

Yeah. There's so much wrong with that. Starting with exactly her mother. Yeah. Like. Well, like exactly what she said. Put some respect on her name. It's Mrs. Moxley.

[Ash]

And she said, he shouldn't have called me at all.

[Elena]

Shouldn't have called her at all. And the fact that he did and said, I. I can feel your pain. No, you can't.

[Ash]

Yeah.

[Elena]

No, you don't know a mother's pain

[Ash]

whose daughter was slaughtered 200ft from her home.

[Elena]

15 year old daughter, like, no, you can't feel her pain. Don't ever say that.

[Ash]

Yeah, that's nuts.

[Elena]

That whole entire decision is nuts from start to finish.

[Ash]

Now, two weeks later, on February 8th, Michael Skakel was arraigned on one count of second degree murder in juvenile court. After reviewing the evidence and the circumstances surrounding the case, the juvenile court judge had the case transferred to the criminal division of the Superior Court, ending the period in which Skakel's name was withheld from any official documents.

[Elena]

Because now he's an adult.

[Ash]

Now, the case was preceded by the usual round of pretrial hearings, but the prosecution was dealt a significant blow on August 7, 2001, when their star witness, former Elon student Gregory Coleman, was found dead from an apparent drug overdose. Coleman was one of the two students who testified to the grand jury that Michael had confessed to killing Martha while at Elon, and his testimony was key to securing a conviction.

[Elena]

I just wanted to let that hang in the room for a minute.

[Ash]

Fortunately, the judge allowed the prosecution to present Coleman's deposition at trial in lieu of his testimony. Okay. But the lack of his presence was a major source of frustration, obviously. Now, Skagel's trial began on May 7, 2002, at the county courthouse in Norwalk. As expected, the trial had drawn a ton of people, like a huge crowd of observers and journalists, many of whom were hoping for an appearance of, like, a rich and famous. A attendee at the trial.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

And they weren't disappointed. I guess. As early as the first day, many members of the Skakel and Kennedy families were in attendance to support Michael, including his cousins, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

[Elena]

Shut up.

[Ash]

And Douglas Kennedy.

[Elena]

I didn't even know there was a Douglas.

[Ash]

Yeah, there's a Douglas. There's so many of them I knew about. Our Kennedys are far reaching. Dominic Dunn said, the thing that I've always found so curious about the Kennedys support of Michael is that Michael wrote a treatment for a book in which he says absolutely terrible things about his cousins, the Kennedys. And yet Bobby Kennedy Jr. Was up here hugging him and supporting him.

[Elena]

Public. Public appearances, babe.

[Ash]

Yeah. In his opening statement, prosecutor Jonathan Benedict laid out the kids, the state's case against Michael, stating with their belief that both Michael and Tommy had been vying for Martha's attention. And while she had no real interest in either of them.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

She clearly favored Tommy a little over his brother.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

And I think that, yeah. Based, like, her diary where, like, Michael was mad because she was quote, unquote, leading him on.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

He seemed.

[Elena]

He seemed kind of protective over his brother.

[Ash]

Yeah. And he seemed like. Yeah. Now, it was the state's assertion that after the group of friends had gone their separate ways that night, Michael returned from his cousin's house and coaxed Martha outside and made a romantic or physical over overture. Okay. To her, you know, When Martha rejected Michael's advances, he became physical and eventually attacked her with the gun. Golf club.

[Ad Read Announcer]

Okay.

[Ash]

Now Remember, and I want to claim, say this again, that this was the prosecutor, Jonathan Benedict's, like, theory. Yeah.

[Elena]

It was the argument.

[Ash]

That's what happened.

[Elena]

Right.

[Ash]

In his statement, Benedict acknowledged that it was incumbent upon the state to prove not only that Michael was a killer, but that he had intended to kill Martha that night. To that end, the prosecutor used a large projection in the courtroom to show the jury and observers the crime scene photographs showing the extent of the brutality Martha had suffered before her death. And he said, and I agree with him, I can think of no photos more compelling of substantiating an intent to kill.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

There is no way whoever did that to Martha did not intend to kill her. No. No. As for how the case was finally broken at the time, Benedict told the jury, sometimes some people simply can't keep a secret. That, as you will see, is how things eventually unraveled for Michael Skakel. In his client's defense, Michael Sherman refuted the state's claims and their theory, arguing that after years of bad police work and pressure to solve the case, investigators decided to just pin the murder on Michael. Okay. He said, the case that we have is based loosely on a very shaky house of cards and mostly wild cards and a few jokers as well. Okay.

[Elena]

Let's not get super theatrical with it.

[Ash]

I'm not out here trying to judge statements in a courtroom.

[Elena]

I'm always out here trying to judge statements in a courtroom.

[Ash]

That made me go, yeah, that's the exact. Ended it at like a shaky house of cards.

[Elena]

Cuz I was nodding. I was like, yeah, with jokers.

[Ash]

I love it. Mostly wild cards, maybe a few jokers. I'd be like, nope, you overdid it.

[Elena]

You overd it.

[Ash]

Run it again, Michael. Run it again.

[Elena]

He didn't run that with like, yeah, anyone.

[Ash]

He didn't read that for anyone. I feel.

[Elena]

No.

[Ash]

Read that in front of someone and see if they go, that's like, yeah, I don't like. Foreign.

[Elena]

It's honestly really easy to ignore your finances until you feel like you're drowning underneath them. Staying on top of your money can feel like a lot, but it doesn't have to be. That's where rocket money comes in. Rocket money helps you keep track of your subscriptions and makes it easy to cancel the ones that you're no longer using. All within the app. In just a few taps. It also brings together your checking, savings, loans, and investments into one simple dashboard. So you can actually see what's going on with your finances. You can build budgets, set savings goals, and get personalized insights with regular reports to help you stay on track. Plus, you'll get real time alerts for things like big purchases, upcoming bills and low balances so that nothing catches you off guard. I truly think that's one of the worst feelings when you have like a major bill coming out. Say it's like a credit card that you use sometimes, not all the time, and you forget when the monthly payment is coming out. The nice thing is that Rocket Money will tell you before that happens and before you're sent to a full panic. Rocket Money is a personal finance app that helps find and cancel unwanted subscriptions, monitors your spending, and helps lower your bills so you can grow your savings. Let Rocket Money help you reach your financial goals faster. [e-mail] Morbid that's RocketMoney.com Morbid RocketMoney.com Morbid

[Ad Read Announcer]

Sling is the live TV service that puts viewers in charge of their entertainment at an unmatched value.

[Elena]

Streaming live sports shows and movies starts

[Ad Read Announcer]

at just 4.99 and everything works instantly across your favorite devices. The best part? Total control over the channel lineup. No paying for tons of channels that never get watched or local channels that are already free and there's also no long term contract. Live TV is available when it's wanted with flexible options like monthly subscriptions or one day, three day or seven day passes. Subscriptions can be paused at any time and entertainment doesn't stop over 600 free channels stay available even after pausing. One thing that I love about Sling

[Ash]

is they have this thing called the

[Ad Read Announcer]

Cloud DVR and it includes 50 hours of storage, but you can also upgrade that to 200 hours.

[Elena]

I love that.

[Ad Read Announcer]

That's awesome because I love to record my shows and watch them later and then fast forward through the commercials. Choose and customize your favorite channel lineup or pause and watch for free. Sling lets you do that. Visit sling.com to learn more.

[Elena]

Getting paid twice a month doesn't mean money is scarce, it just feels that way. That feeling makes you do weird stuff like putting things on a card you didn't need to earn in removes that feeling. With Earn in, you can Access up to $150 per day of money you've already earned, plus up to $1,000 between pay standard transfers. Take one to two business days with no mandatory fees and expedited transfers start at 399 and cap at $5.99. 5 million people are already on it and honestly it's wild it didn't exist sooner. Download Earnin on the app Store or Google Play. Spelled like earning money without the G. Type in morbid under podcast when you sign up. It'll really help the show. Earn in is a financial technology company, not a bank. Access limits are based on your earnings and risk factors. Standard cashouts take one to two business days with no mandatory fees. Expedited transfer is available for a fee. Tips are valid, voluntary, and don't affect the service. Available in select states. Terms and restrictions apply. Visit ernan.com for full details.

[Ash]

Now, the state's case against Michael was entirely circumstantial, and it hinged very significantly on the testimony of Gregory Coleman.

[Elena]

Right.

[Ash]

Who'd heard Skagel's confession, but he had passed away, Right? Yes. Coleman's death before the trial was a big problem for Benedict. However, several weeks into the trial, the prosecutor was contacted by Jennifer. Jennifer Pease, another former Elon student, who offered to testify and corroborate Coleman's statement that Michael not only confessed to the murder, but also that he believed, and I quote, he was going to get away with murder because he was a Kennedy. So this is what Jennifer Pease was saying that she could back up. She told the jury that Coleman had confided in her that he thought Michael Skakel was, quote, sick and that Skakel had, quote, beat some girl's head in and killed her with a golf club.

[Elena]

Oh, yeah.

[Ash]

The testimony from Jennifer Pease went a long way to corroborating Coleman's earlier statements and those of his widow, who testified prior to peace. Wow. On June 3rd, the prosecution and defense gave their final statements before the jury retired to deliberate.

[Elena]

That's today.

[Ash]

Oh, my God. That's. I'm not kidding, guys. We don't do this on purpose.

[Elena]

Today is June 3rd, though. That's so weird.

[Ash]

What the.

[Elena]

This happens to us so often.

[Ash]

I don't know.

[Elena]

I had to stop you before you got anything.

[Ash]

You guys, I swear on everything. We do not do this on purpose.

[Elena]

A lot of times we're supposed to record earlier than we do.

[Ash]

Yeah. And then we don't. And when we do record, it ends falling on the date.

[Elena]

Yeah. Because we were gonna record this yesterday, but then we didn't. Yeah. So that's weird. That's weird.

[Ash]

That's weird. Okay. Wow. Well, on June 3rd, the prosecution and defense gave their final statements before the jury retired to deliberate. In his closing remarks, Jonathan Benedict focused on the sheer brutality of the crime and Skakel's sense of untouchability afforded to him by his family's wealth and power. He said, this is really Graphic, by the way. Okay. He said the act of stabbing her through the neck from one side through the other is the most emphatic evidence of pure hatred, rage, and intent to kill. Now, in his final argument, Michael Sherman was blunt and simple.

[Elena]

He didn't practice this one either.

[Ash]

Good morning. He didn't do it. He didn't do it. He doesn't know who did. He wasn't there when the crimes were committed, and he never confessed. That's the whole case, babe.

[Elena]

That's not going to convince me of anything. That's just going to convince me. You didn't have your morning coffee.

[Ash]

Yeah, that did the. I feel like you. You. You should have done this earlier.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Like, I feel like this is one of those that you were like, I did this before breakfast.

[Elena]

Like, that was it.

[Ash]

I just threw that one together.

[Elena]

Yeah, that's a rough.

[Ash]

But then he just used the rest of it. So that was his. Like, here's what I'm gonna.

[Elena]

Here's my argument.

[Ash]

He didn't do it. He didn't do it. He doesn't know who did. He wasn't there. He never confessed. That's it.

[Elena]

Are you gonna tell me why, though?

[Ash]

And then the rest of the time, he just used to attack the prosecution. That's nice. The witnesses and the investigators for what he alleged was a concerted effort to frame Michael Skakel. He said, I have to tell you, this is the worst run conspiracy I've ever seen.

[Elena]

Wow.

[Ash]

Now, the jury deliberated for four days before finally coming out. On June 8th.

[Elena]

My birthday.

[Ash]

Hey. To find Michael Skakel guilty of the murder of Martha Moxley.

[Elena]

Oh, bad day for Michael.

[Ash]

Now, when the verdict was read, Skakel swayed slightly and shook his head in disbelief. From somewhere behind him, a member of the Skakel family shouted, oh, my God. Martha's family, on the other hand, was very happy with the jury's decision.

[Elena]

You wait that long for justice for your daughter.

[Ash]

Dorothy told a group of reporters this whole thing was about Martha. Yeah. I feel so blessed and so overwhelmed. This is Martha's day. I hope people remember that. Now, when asked about the verdict his book had seemingly helped secure at the time, Mark Fuhrman praised the jury. He said they were attentive. They gave away nothing. They made no mistakes. Even when I talked to them, they said they were of one mind. Very early on, that he was guilty. Now, in late August, Skakel went back to the Norwalk court for sentencing. And when asked whether he had anything to say for himself, Skakel went on the offensive. He attacked his accusers and repeatedly professed his innocence before passing sentence. Judge John Kavaniewski's address to the court was pretty broad. Just saying, for the last 25 years or more, a period well into his adult life, the defendant has been living a lie about his guilt. Most importantly, this defendant has accepted no responsibility. He has expressed no personal remorse. To this present day, all of this persuades me to impose a sentence which, on balance, is substantial. And with that, he sentenced Skakel to 20 years to life to be served at the Garner Correctional Institution in Newtown, Connecticut. Okay. Now, his appeals began almost immediately after the sentence. In 2004, the Connecticut Supreme Court heard his claims that, among other things, his constitutional rights were violated when the state prosecuted him for a crime in which the statute of limitations had expired. The argument depended largely on Skakel having been underage when the murder was committed, and the judge in juvenile court had erred in transferring the case to criminal court court. In their conclusion, the justices upheld the lower court's ruling, noting, if the trial court erred in their actions, the defendant has not established harm. Okay. So they just kept it. They were like, no. Now, in subsequent appeals, Skakel's defense team made a number of claims of improper conduct, from claims of prosecutorial misconduct to the credibility of witness testimony and beyond.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

Each case was considered by the higher courts and rejected on the merit. Now. Then, in 2013, Skakel launched another appear appeal for a new trial, this time arguing that his original trial attorney, Michael Sherman, was incompetent and was more interested in building his own reputation and celebrity than he was in defending his client.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

Martha Moxley's friends, family, and neighbors waited more than 25 years for her to see justice, and it felt like it had finally been found. Yeah. But in November 2013, Judge Thomas Bishop agreed with Skakel's complaint and ordered a new trial. In his conclusion, Judge Bishop noted that Michael Sherman, quote, was, in a myriad of ways, ineffective. And as such, there was no way to be certain that the jury was acting on the best information available.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

To Martha's family, who had been struggling through a frustrating investigation and decades of uncertainty in trials, the reversal was a massive disappointment. Of course it was, but one that was not entirely uncomfortable. Unexpected, unfortunately, yeah. Given the extent of Skakel's resources. Dorothy Moxley told reporters after Skakel was released on bail pending a new trial, I guess I knew that the day would come. And she said, it would have made my life much easier for this not to happen. Oh, that must be because I can't even, like, come up with how that would feel. To have it like, finally, this is over. We can start healing. But then to start moving on, but

[Elena]

to ever really believe it's true, but

[Ash]

then it's just reverse.

[Elena]

And that's the thing. And they were. It's like holding your breath, waiting for the moment.

[Ash]

Like, because she believed that they got it right. Yeah. But she never believed that it would hold because she knows they have infinite resources now. Like Dorothy Moxley, the prosecution was ready when the reversal happened and had already started preparing for a retrial. Okay. Fortunately, however, the prosecution wouldn't have to go that route. In 2016, the Connecticut Supreme Court overruled the lower court and concluded that Skakel had, in fact, been given a fair trial, even if he didn't feel as though the lawyer provided the best possible defense. Okay. One of the justices wrote in their concurrence, Sherman's defense need not have been the best decision or even a good one. It need only fall within the wide range of reasonable decisions that a defense attorney might make. Okay. To those who'd been watching the case from day one, the state Supreme Court's decision seemed like an attempt to correct the previous injustice.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Yeah. But there wasn't much time to celebrate.

[Elena]

Okay.

[Ash]

It's like up and down, up and down. In fact, despite having reinstated the conviction, the question of whether Michael Sherman provided adequate representation would be argued back and forth in the state Supreme Court for two more years until May 2018, when the court ultimately reversed their original decision, their earlier decision, and agreed with Skakel's complaint that his lawyer had been ineffective and thus. Thus, he was originally deprived of a fair trial. Okay. From the moment he was arrested in 1991, nearly everyone in Greenwich, Connecticut, watched and waited to see how Michael Skakel's wealth and power would possibly help him in this scenario. They figured it was just a foregone conclusion that it was going to come into play. Yeah. To the shock of many, that proved ineffective when a jury found him guilty and a judge sentenced him to spend the rest of his life in prison. Securing Skakel's conviction in a lengthy sentence was a major victory for the prosecution, who had to again contend with really poor police work, missing evidence, the death of their star witness mid trial. But in truth, his conviction was just never a sure bet. The case. There was a lot of circumstantial stuff, and there was a lot of time between the crime and when the trial occurred. There was just a lot that were

[Elena]

a lot working against them.

[Ash]

Yeah. Now that Skakel had once again managed to win a new trial and was out on bail. The district attorney needed to decide whether they could feasibly secure the same verdict nearly 30 years later, with many of their witnesses having passed away or simply forgotten the important parts of their testimony. Because they're getting older, right? That's. I don't remember 30 years ago. No.

[Elena]

And it's. You can't necessarily rely on somebody's memory from 30 years ago as you're on a jury.

[Ash]

And everybody's memory is different. Different. It's like, I don't have a great memory. Like, my friend. Like, Deb. Deb will say things that are like, remember when this happened? I'm like, oh, yeah. Like.

[Elena]

Or I'll just be like, no, I don't remember that.

[Ash]

Yeah, like, my brain. My memory is just like, weird. I remember weird shit. I don't remember good shit. And it's like that. So you just can't be sure. But in the end, Chief state's attorney Richard Colangelo looked at the potential battle of a new trial and determined that retrying Michael Skakel simply wasn't a good use of the state's resources.

[Elena]

I hate when they say that. Like, I get what they're saying, but I just hate how it sounds, he said.

[Ash]

I believe the state cannot prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the state is going to enter a null pross, which means to be unwilling to pursue. Oh. Once it was formally entered in 2021, the Noel processed in a discharge of the murder charge against Michael Skagal.

[Elena]

So he was never necessarily proven innocent. They were just like, we think you did this, but we can't prove it.

[Ash]

Basically, we just don't think we can prove you guilty again.

[Elena]

It's almost like what happened with the West Memphis three. I know that's like a whole different

[Ash]

process, but it's like a little. That's more. We're not saying what it's like. Basically, they can't. They. They just say that they did it and the state will let them go. And that means they can't sue the state. State. Oh, that's what it means with the West Memphis.

[Elena]

So that's a little different.

[Ash]

That's an Alfred plea. Yeah. This is them being like, we just don't think putting resources to retrying you will get us the conviction, but we

[Elena]

still think you did it.

[Ash]

But, like. And I don't even know. I don't even know if it's. That's not even part of it. I think it's just like, we don't think we just can't prove it. We're not going to put the resources forward because we don't think we could get a conviction again. Wow. So you will be. That's really. So. Although. So he was a free man once again. Okay. Although it is possible that Skagel could be charged again and taken to trial. That is a thing. In the absence of the, you know, any new compelling evidence of his guilt, it seems pretty unlikely because nothing has come out since then that points to him. Yeah. Regardless of the prosecutor's decision, Dorothy Skakel remained convinced that they got it right the first time. Yeah. While she was disappointed with the outcome, she told reporters she was, quote, satisfied with the efforts of police and prosecutors. All right. So like, damn. At least she had that. A very impressive outlook. Yeah, she did.

[Elena]

That's.

[Ash]

But sadly, on December 24th, Christmas Eve, 2024, Dorothy Moxley died at her home in New Jersey at the age of 92. Wow. But from complications of the flu. Oh, that's awful. Now, technically, Martha Moxley's murder remains unsolved to this day and is currently inactive. Oh. It should be active. Which makes me crazy. It should be active because regardless, I. That's like the fact.

[Elena]

16 year old girl was murdered.

[Ash]

The facts of the case. I am not giving my personal opinion on this. The facts of the case are Michael Skakel was convicted of the murder. He was. Was granted a new trial and they chose not to pursue it. So he was freed. That's just the facts of the case. Yep. I don't know. Again, no more compelling evidence has come forward to. That we know of or that has been released, I should say, or come public to say that he did it or that anyone else did it. And that's what's really frustrating. It's like we don't have anything else. There's nothing else we can dig into.

[Elena]

They need to review that evidence.

[Ash]

I want to look at that again. Why is.

[Elena]

Did fingerprinting ever happen on that thing?

[Ash]

I don't know. Because also the golf club broke, so I don't know if it was hard to get.

[Elena]

Oh, who knows if they have both parts.

[Ash]

Yeah. I don't know. I don't know exactly what parts they were able to like or what the parts. What kind of condition.

[Elena]

But then like she was discovered with her pants, like around her.

[Ash]

Yes. And the. The medical examiner said there was no evidence of sexual assault, but there was red marks on her thighs that were like handprints that he believed were someone trying to wrench her knees apart. But there was no biological evidence of sexual assault that they found. Okay. That's not saying with 100% certainty. Yeah. But they were. They were fairly confident that they didn't believe.

[Elena]

I think this investigation just was tough.

[Ash]

It's got a lot around it. It's got a lot going on. But right now, you know, Michael Skakel is not a con. You know, not considered the person that did it. Yeah. Right now.

[Elena]

But you know what we say. A cold case is never cold.

[Ash]

Exactly.

[Elena]

I take that as well, I think, because this is. It's open though, right? Yeah, open but inactive.

[Ash]

It's. It's unsolved and inactive. I think it's just.

[Elena]

Oh, yes.

[Ash]

Okay. Okay. So it's. It's a bummer. I would love to see it solved. Regardless of who is the person they identify. I would like it to be solved.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Just for Martha's family.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Their.

[Elena]

Their family deserves justice and so does Martha.

[Ash]

Yeah. And for the people who have. But there was a. There's a few names thrown around in this case. It would. It would be nice if you could, you know, exonerate those. Those names or prove that somebody did it. Yeah.

[Elena]

Just. Just have some certainty.

[Ash]

You know, there's a lot of people that were involved in this case that. That are thrown around here.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Yeah. Wow. What a.

[Elena]

What a brutal case. And just, just.

[Ash]

It's awful.

[Elena]

It's so awful and it's so messy and it's so sad.

[Ash]

Super promising.

[Elena]

It's so sad for so many reasons.

[Ash]

Life ahead of her. Yeah. Doing everything right. Just being a teenager in the 80s or the 70s.

[Elena]

70s.

[Ash]

And this is awful.

[Elena]

Just go and hang out with her friends and.

[Ash]

In a place that like didn't have crime. Yeah. Like a safe, you know, like so like this is just like, like even weirder and it's. And it makes you think more that this was someone who potentially knew her because like, it's not like random strangers

[Elena]

were being attacked or anything like that skulking around Belhaven. Yeah.

[Ash]

Except for that hitchhiker that they claim they saw. Yeah. Nobody could prove if they existed or not. Yeah. But who knows?

[Elena]

You never know.

[Ash]

I don't know.

[Elena]

You never know.

[Ash]

Yeah.

[Elena]

I think we need a fun fact.

[Ash]

We do need a fun fact. Fact. Do you have a fun fact?

[Elena]

Debbie has a good one.

[Ash]

Oh my God. I. Deb. Dev just found the greatest fun fact that just like ruined my life with the visual as well. Cuz that is the cutest baby elephant I've ever seen in my life.

[Elena]

Elephants are my favorite.

[Ash]

Baby elephants suck. Their trunks for comfort. Like a baby, like, would suck their thumb or, like a pacifier. Pacifier. And they suck their thumbs, like, just to. Or their. Their. Their trunk thumbs.

[Elena]

Yeah.

[Ash]

Just to soothe themselves when they're tired, anxious, or away from their mamas. And please, look at this elephant.

[Elena]

Oh, my God.

[Ash]

I think my entire life just changed because of that picture of that baby elephant. Elephants.

[Elena]

So much. Elephants are the best animals ever. They literally, like, they hold funerals.

[Ash]

Oh. They take care of each other.

[Elena]

They live in communities, protect.

[Ash]

They save each other's babies.

[Elena]

Yeah. Like, they are. We are not. We don't deserve elephants.

[Ash]

We don't deserve them at all.

[Elena]

We don't. We don't deserve most animals.

[Ash]

My youngest had us walk, watch a show on Disney plus that was, like, called Elephant, I think, or something. And it was just about a whole group of elephants.

[Elena]

Oh, honey, I'm finna want one of

[Ash]

the elephants saved another one's baby. They do. From being stuck in mud. Cutest thing I've ever seen. They, like, never gave up. They were like, I'm saving this baby.

[Elena]

So elephants also. While we're talking about that, Drew and I have been watching this show. I think it's on Hulu. It's about the San Diego Zoo.

[Ash]

Oh, my God.

[Elena]

And it is so much fun.

[Ash]

I love that.

[Elena]

I don't necessarily recommend watching with your children because it's. They do talk about mating season. I literally. I was just about to recommend it to Elena because they were talking about koalas, and her girls love koalas. But then they were like, he's about to have sexy time with the other koala ladies. And I was like, okay, maybe don't have them watching.

[Ash]

She texted me, and she was like, oh, my God, they should watch this. And then, like, 10 minutes later, she was like, scratch that. They should not watch this yet.

[Elena]

Maybe not yet.

[Ash]

Yet. You probably have to talk.

[Elena]

But if you're, like, an adult who loves animals, it's a really good show, though.

[Ash]

I love that.

[Elena]

So check it out.

[Ash]

Hell, yeah.

[Elena]

And with that being said, we hope

[Ash]

you keep listening, and we hope you keep it weird.

[Elena]

Just not too weird.

[Ash]

Not too weird that you leave this case unsolved?

[Elena]

Yes.

[Ash]

Not that weird. Sa. Foreign. I'm Cyndi Lauper with fellow Cosentyx advocate chef Michelle Bernstein. We'll share our experiences with plaque psoriasis with psoriatic arthritis, and Dr. Panico will talk about the possible connection.

[Cosentyx Advocate Cindy]

Cosentic secukinumab is prescribed for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. 300 milligram dose and adults with active psoriatic arthritis 150 milligram dose. Don't use if you're allergic to Cosentyx before starting, get checked for tuberculosis. An increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. Like tuberculosis or other serious bacterial, fungal or viral infections, some are fatal. Tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms like fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough had a vaccine or planned to, or if inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, serious allergic reactions and severe eczema like skin reactions may occur. Learn more at 1-844-cosentix or cosentix.com Cindy

[Stamps.com Announcer]

still waiting in line again? That's time you'll never get back. Save time and money with stamps.com over 4 million businesses have skipped the line with stamps.com join them to save up to 90% off carrier rates from your computer or phone right now, print postage for certified mail, registered mail and packages in seconds. Then schedule a pickup right from your home or office for a limited time. Go to stamps.com and use code podcast for a free welcome gift. Taxes and fees apply.