
How many people in the world live in freedom? The BBC's Freedom 2014 season got Tim or...
Loading summary
A
This is the short edition of More or Less, first broadcast on the BBC World Service.
B
Thank you for downloading from the BBC. For details of our complete range of podcasts and our terms of use, go to bbcworldservice.com podcasts
A
hello and welcome to More or Less the Numbers programme on the BBC World Service. This week we bring you an edition of the programme that was first broadcast live as part of the BBC's Freedom Season with Tim Harford.
C
The BBC's Freedom Season got us wondering about how many people in the world live in freedom and how many don't. We'll be looking at that in a few minutes. But first, we're broadcasting live from the BBC Media Cafe in London. So there's the small matter of persuading Ruth Alexander to pay for my coffee.
A
Tim, I'd rather assume that as the gentleman you are, you'd be footing the bill.
C
Well, I am a gentleman, but I'm also an economist, so no. But I'll tell you what. We're drinking medium sized cappuccinos, they cost £2.35 each, that's about $3.90. So how about I pay for the cost of the coffee and the milk in the drinks and all you have to do is pay for the rest, is that ok?
A
Well, as you're an economist, there's got to be a catch. So I bet the coffee and the milk only accounts for what, about half the price of this drink?
C
Oh, no, no, no, no, nothing like that. In fact, the coffee in your cup costs much less than that. It costs just 14 cents. The milk costs only another 14 cents. So? So the rest of the drink costs $3.63 and you owe me. Well, let's round it down. We'll call it $7 for both the drinks.
A
Gosh. So the cup of coffee cost $3.90, but the coffee and the milk together cost just 28 cents.
C
You sound surprised. You've obviously never run a coffee shop or indeed never read the report from an industry analyst. I've got in front of me which describes the cost of coffee in a place such as London or New York or Tokyo. So there's the cup, there's the lid, the sugar, the stirrer. Put them together, they cost a little less than 30 cents.
A
So the cost of what I have in my hand here is just 60 cents. So the rest is profit?
C
No, not quite. Profit is about 50 cents a cup. Rent and business taxes another 60 cents. It's not cheap to rent a space on a busy high street and staff costs they're almost a dollar a cup.
A
Well, staff. Well, that's a lot more than I imagined. A dollar?
C
Well, it's a quarter of the total cost. So they're working hard. They have to make the coffee, they have to serve it to you to clean up after you. In the UK, there's value added tax as well. That's another 65 cents on the cost of your cup of coffee.
A
Alright, well, you've stitched me up nicely, Tim on live radio. Thank you. But it sounds like coffee farmers are being stitched up too. And you do often hear, don't you, about coffee farmers being paid tiny amounts for the coffee they produce? And your numbers are showing this.
C
Well, it's certainly true. Most of the people who drink the coffee are far more fortunate than the people who are growing the coffee in places such as Brazil or Uganda, Vietnam, Ethiopia. Although there is a silver lining in some ways. The fact that the coffee, coffee in these expensive cappuccinos only cost 14 cents, it's sort of encouraging. It suggests if there was some way for farmers to be paid more, the extra cost of the coffee would only add a few cents to the cost of a drink bought in a cafe in London or another city in the industrialised world.
A
So this would explain then, wouldn't it, why initiatives like fair Trade coffee have become so popular? They claim to raise the price and the living standards of coffee farmers. And I guess whether or not they succeed, we've seen that there's room in the price of a cappuccino to make such ideas possible.
C
Well, absolutely, but you're changing the subject. Ruth. You owe me $7.
A
Oh. Do you know, I'm sorry, I think I forgot my wallet.
C
Okay, well, you can go and talk to it. I'll talk to our guest, Simon Baptist. He joins us from the Economist Intelligence Unit, which is an analysis and forecasting group. I've given up on making Simon pay for the coffee. Simon, it's Freedom Live today and we're a numbers program. It's actually pretty hard to put a number on freedom. So why don't we try and start with something more quantifiable? Democracy. How many people in the world live in a democracy?
D
We think that around half the world's population live in some form of democracy, but only about 10% in what we would class as a full democracy. Because of course, there are varying shades.
C
So what are these different shades?
D
I mean, we have four categories, but the names of the categories are not too interesting. But democracy is not just about voting and not just about Having elections. It's about participation in elections, the absence or prevalence of corruption. It's about public confidence in institutions. It's about public safety in when you go to cast your vote. So all these things matter.
C
So give us an example of a country that's in the top tier of democracy, the most democratic states.
D
So as always, Scandinavian countries come at the top of these kind of indices, along with New Zealand, Australia and Canada. These are countries that have free and fair elections, they have protected civil rights and they have high public confidence in their institutions.
C
And what about further down the list, flawed democracies or what you call hybrid democracies?
D
Yeah, some countries that are democratic, but we don't class as full democracies include France and Hong Kong. In France, for example, they have free and fair elections.
C
The French will be delighted to hear this.
D
They will be. They're very close to a full democracy. But public confidence in institutions is very low in France, and that's one of the key factors for a full democracy.
C
And what about weaknesses in what you call hybrid systems? So Egypt or Sri Lanka or Kenya or Mozambique.
D
Yeah, often in those hybrid regimes, there is some public influence over political decisions, but not full freedom and not full influence. For example, in Sri Lanka, many people in Tamil regions find it difficult to vote. The political system is increasingly authoritarian. There are. With power being concentrated in the family of the president.
C
Now, the least democratic states in your survey are classed as authoritarian regimes. I know a lot of people will be listening to this program from Nigeria. There are elections in Nigeria, but Nigeria is classified by you as authoritarian. So what's the thinking there?
D
Yeah, so Nigeria does have elections, but there are some serious problems with democracy in Nigeria. I mean, firstly, voters don't have security when they go to cast their vote. People in the south and the north are not able to cast a ballot with full freedom. And so that is a huge break on democracy. Corruption is also really pervasive and public institutions such as the Central bank are not independent.
C
Simon Baptiste from the Economist Intelligence Unit, thank you very much. We also wondered whether people who live in these democracies are happier and are. Ruth Alexander's back from searching for her wallet. You've been looking into this, Ruth?
A
Yes, and what I found chimes with what you've both just been talking about. The countries which come out on top in the United Nations World Happiness Report are all democracies. In first place is Denmark, followed by Norway, Switzerland, the Netherlands. Then Sweden's in fifth place, and then it's Canada, Finland, Austria, Iceland and Australia in 10th place because I didn't need
C
you to finish the list. I could sort of tick off the names as you went through them. So these are the 10 happiest countries in the world. And so how does the UN measure happiness?
A
Well, they use a standard survey question. Basically, they ask people to rate the life they're leading on a scale from 0 to 10. So, as I said, all the happiest places are also democracies. Of the ten least happy countries, not one is a fully fledged democracy and seven are authoritarian regimes. Togo is in last place. And just above them, the Central African Republic, Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Guinea, Comoros and Syria.
C
So should we conclude that freedom and happiness go hand in hand?
A
Well, perhaps. But it's probably not democracy as such that makes people happy. An economist in the United States, Ronald Engelhardt, who I've been talking to, he's noted that after the revolutions in 1989, happiness levels in most of the former communist countries dipped. Then again, it probably wasn't democracy that made people unhappy, more likely the fact that their economy slumped and problems like crime went up. He says reported happiness has in fact increased in many of the world's countries over the last 30 years, which he puts down in part to the fact it's been a period of increasing democracy. One of the authors of the UN study on happiness, we were talking about, John Helliwell, he told me that the root of satisfaction seems to be how well government services are delivered, and that affects people, people's sense of well being much more than the fact that elections are held. Singapore is again, a country that shows us it's not a fully fledged democracy, but it delivers services quite efficiently and it scores quite highly in terms of the happiness of its people.
C
Is there a more direct measure of the association between freedom and happiness?
A
Yes. The UN report also looks at something it calls freedom to make life choices. And that's based on a survey which simply asks people, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your freedom to choose what you do with your life? And perhaps, unsurprisingly, when people answer yes, they're also more likely to say they're happy with their lives taken as a whole. Norway's at the top of that scale, Iraq at the bottom.
C
Well, thank you very much, Ruth. That's all we have time for here from the BBC Media Cafe in Broadcasting House in London. And you can get a free download of this program at our website, bbcworldservice.com more or less.
B
There are dozens of different podcasts now available from the BBC, including news, documentaries, science, business arts and sport. For details of them all, go to bbcworldservice. Com Podcasts.
BBC Radio 4 — April 5, 2014
In this lively episode of More or Less, Tim Harford and his co-host Ruth Alexander dive into the complex relationship between numbers, freedom, democracy, and happiness. Originally broadcast as part of the BBC’s Freedom Season, the show asks: How many people around the world live in freedom? Through expert insights and entertaining anecdotes (including a cheeky breakdown of the economics of a cup of coffee), the hosts challenge assumptions around what statistics reveal about liberty and well-being.
Segment: 00:32 – 03:33
Guest: Simon Baptist, Economist Intelligence Unit
Segment: 03:41 – 06:32
Segment: 06:32 – 09:04
Segment: 08:39 – 09:04
On Coffee Economics:
On Defining Democracy:
On Freedom and Wellbeing:
The episode is witty, conversational, and insightful. Tim Harford uses humor and real-world examples to make statistics accessible, while co-host Ruth Alexander grounds the discussion in research and expert opinion. The segment with Simon Baptist brings scholarly expertise and global perspective, making complex topics approachable for a broad audience.
This summary captures the essential topics and intellectual spirit of “Freedom in Numbers,” offering listeners and non-listeners alike a clear, nuanced picture of how the numbers behind coffee, democracy, and happiness relate to the broad theme of freedom.