
Can data tell us if a stock market crash is coming?
Loading summary
Nathan Gower
This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the uk.
Ryan Seacrest
Hey, it's Ryan Seacrest for Albertsons and Safeway. Flu season is here and our pharmacies have you covered with a free flu shot with most insurance plans. Plus it's cough and cold season and now through December 2nd. Stock up on all the season's essentials and get ready for relief with discounts on items like Mucinex, Cold and Flu Kickstart, Mucinex, Fast Max Products, Vicks, Dayquil and Nyquil Combo Pack. Alka select, also Airborne and afrin offers end December 2nd. Restrictions apply and offers may vary by location. Visit Albertsons or Safeway.com for more details.
Nathan Gower
Okay, only 10 more presents to wrap. You're almost at the finish line, but.
Katie Martin
First.
Nathan Gower
There the last one. Enjoy a Coca Cola for a pause that refreshes. Hello and thanks for downloading the More or Less podcast. I'm Nathan Gower. We're the program that thinks you only really understand the world by looking at it through numbers, and there are no shortage of those in what we're discussing today. Stock markets. These are where shares in publicly listed companies are bought and sold, and where fortunes are made and lost. In recent months, stock markets have been a hot topic, as fevered excitement about the potential of artificial intelligence has driven the value of tech companies ever higher. Senior figures in global finance, from the CEO of JPMorgan Chase to the governor of the bank of England, have been expressing worries in recent weeks. Even the boss of Google has said the AI investment boom has elements of irrationality. So is this rise unsustainable? A so called bubble that might go pop? It's a question our loyal listeners are asking. Like Yanni, my social media circles often characterise the AI boom as a bubble. I'd love to hear a more or less take on this. Can we identify economic bubbles before they burst? And does the current AI fad qualify as one? An excellent question, Yanni. Well, last month we spoke to some experts in financial markets for another BBC podcast, the Briefing Room, and they had a go at answering this exact question. First up, Simon French, chief economist at the investment company Panmure Liberum. Just how big is the recent rise in the value of the stock market?
Simon French
The rebound in global stock markets, led by the US stock market, has added about $28 trillion to the value of global shares. Now, to put that number in context, that's almost the size of the US economic output each year, and that's a 31% increase in just six months since the the global stock markets bottomed out after Liberation day in the US and that has only happened on three previous occasions in modern market history. 1987, 1999 and 2009.
Nathan Gower
Now, just in case you haven't been playing the stock market for the last 40 years, let's recap. 1987 saw the Black Monday crash. 1999 saw the dot com bubble which burst the following year. And 2009 was in the wake of the great financial crisis. Now the stock market never stands still. And since we spoke to Simon just a few weeks ago, it has continued to rise. That $28 trillion in added value is now about $30 trillion. But how much of this rise is down to AI?
Simon French
Unfortunately, we don't put tech stocks in a neat bucket of what is AI and what is not AI. Are they true AI companies? It's very difficult to decipher. So if you just take the sector classification of technology, it's about half that.
Nathan Gower
Addition of market capitalization to put that into numbers. Global stocks have added $30 trillion in value and about 12.5 trillion of that is in the technology sector, almost half the added value. But it's not just the scale of this increase in this short time that is raising eyebrows. There are other more sophisticated metrics we can look at.
Simon French
Equity analysts, strategists will use a variety of measures to understand how expensive stock markets are. One of the most widely used is the Shiller price earnings rat, which controls the fact that earnings sometimes in companies are volatile. And that measure is hovering around 40 times earnings in the US stock market. Now it's only been there once before in modern market history and that was at the height of the dot com bubble in 99 early 2000.
Nathan Gower
We've mentioned the dot com bubble a few times now. It's a moment from history that often comes up in discussions about a potential AI bubble. Katie Martin is a markets columnist at the Financial Times.
Katie Martin
There was a period of time where, you know, as Simon was suggesting, there was, you know, the Internet was born. Hooray, we've got this bouncing baby Internet. And there was a bunch of stocks that were connected with it. And there are some of them that have, you know, survived through to the end. You look at, you know, you look at Amazon for example, that's the kind of prime example of the company that sprang up in this era and has become this multi trillion dollar behemoth. But what you also had along the way is a whole series of stocks that reached out absolutely crazy valuations. So stock investors were saying, we think this particular stock is worth Hundreds of multiples of the amount of money that the company is actually making. The prime example that people always bring up here is pets.com and, and so there was this cluster of stocks that were worth just well in excess of the money that they were actually making. And inevitably that ran out of road and they all crashed all at once. And that left a really significant mark on US stock markets. It took years for people to, if they had invested at the top. It took years for people to come back to being whole.
Nathan Gower
Okay, back to the present. It's undoubtedly true that the US stock market has had a very strong year so far. But Katie Martin thinks there's more to it than meets the eye.
Katie Martin
One of the really important things to bear in mind here is that the main index that everyone talks about when they talk about US stocks is the S&P 500 and that is weighted, weighted according to the size of the companies inside it. Now you know, wrap your head around this number. Nvidia is worth, last time I checked, 4.4 trillion with a T dollars. That is a chunk of change. Yeah. One of the things that people really worry about in relation to the AI trade is we are talking about a tiny number of companies. You know, people talk about the magnificent seven, the tech stocks in the US seven, just seven. You know, there's 500 stocks more or less in the S&P 500. So there's a lot of companies that are having a stinker of a year. But the index is being held up. You know, on top of these companies like Apple which is having a great run. Nvidia, which is just, just too big to even wrap your head around in the chips industry. So it is very, very concentrated. And to me that means you have quite a small number of potential points of failure. Which worries me somewhat.
Nathan Gower
That Magnificent Seven that Katie Martin mentions are the seven huge tech giants which dominate the global tech scene. You've got Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Meta and Tesla. Some people argue that if AI turns out not to be as profitable as hoped, many of these established companies have broad shoulders and earn huge amounts of cash from other areas. And that reduces the likelihood of, of a bad crash in value. But not all tech companies are so lucky. Simon French Again, another interesting data point.
Simon French
Is the rally that we've seen in the US stock market. While a lot of the focus comes on those big cash generative Magnificent Seven stocks, the biggest rally since April is amongst non profitable technology companies, those that don't make any earnings at the moment. And that has uncomfortable parallels with the dot com era, where that was really those, those companies were the poster child of some of those ones that had what were very, very elevated valuations that triggered the bubble bursting.
Nathan Gower
So let's go back to our listeners question, can we identify bubbles before they burst?
Simon French
So listeners should never think that any of us, however senior we are, Jamie Dimon, Andrew Bailey, Jerome Powell, none of us really know how to time the market. The best investors of all time acknowledge that the greatest economist of all time, John Wayne, said the market can remain irrational longer than I can remain solvent. And that is an important message to remember. The point I would make is you try and calibrate. You calibrate, are there more risky signals out there or less risky signals? And you calibrate how much risk you would take accordingly. I would say on the balance, there are more risky signals than I've seen for quite a long time in the stock market. So I'd be more cautious in that environment.
Nathan Gower
Our thanks to Simon French and Katie Martin. That's all we've got time for this week. And remember, if, like Yanni, you've got a burning question that you'd like to outsource the research for, just drop us a line at more or lessbc.co.uk. please give us something to do. Lizzie is just working on her side project of counting all the prime numbers.
Simon French
Up to a million 694,193, 694,201.
Nathan Gower
Tune in next week to see if she's finished. If you want to pass the time, try listening to the briefing room on BBC Sounds. Until then, goodbye.
Ray Winstone
Hello, it's Ray Winstone. I'm here to tell you about my podcast on BBC Radio 4, History's Toughest Heroes. I've got stories about the pioneers, the rebels, the outcasts who define tough. And that was the first time that anybody ever ran a car up that fast with no tires on. It almost feels like your eyeballs are going to come out of your head. Tough enough for you? Subscribe to History's Toughest Heroes. Wherever you get your podcast.
Air Date: November 22, 2025
Host: Nathan Gower (BBC Radio 4)
Guests: Simon French (Chief Economist, Panmure Liberum), Katie Martin (Markets Columnist, Financial Times)
This episode addresses the burning question on many investors’ minds: Is the current stock market boom – especially the tech sector surge driven by artificial intelligence (AI) hype – a bubble on the brink of bursting? Host Nathan Gower guides listeners through the data, enlisting the help of economics and markets experts, to cut through speculation and use numbers to assess risk, bubbles, and the likelihood of a crash.
Timestamps: [02:48] – [03:54]
Simon French explains:
“That number… that’s a 31% increase in just six months… and that has only happened on three previous occasions in modern market history.”
— Simon French [02:48]
Timestamps: [03:54] – [04:29]
It's hard to separate "AI companies" from broader tech, but:
“If you just take the sector classification of technology, it’s about half that… about $12.5 trillion.”
— Simon French [03:54]
Timestamps: [04:29] – [06:15]
Analysis through the Shiller Price/Earnings Ratio:
“That measure [Shiller PE] is hovering around 40 times earnings… it’s only been there once before… at the height of the dot com bubble in 99, early 2000.”
— Simon French [04:29]
“There was this cluster of stocks that were worth well in excess of the money that they were actually making. And inevitably that ran out of road and they all crashed all at once.”
— Katie Martin [05:08]
Timestamps: [06:15] – [07:31]
The US S&P 500 index is highly weighted to the biggest companies.
“We are talking about a tiny number of companies… there’s a lot of companies that are having a stinker of a year. But the index is being held up… and to me that means you have quite a small number of potential points of failure, which worries me somewhat.”
— Katie Martin [06:26]
Timestamps: [08:06] – [08:38]
The sharpest post-April increase is among US tech companies with no current profits.
Echoes of dot-com era, when unprofitable tech saw wild valuations leading up to the crash.
“The biggest rally since April is amongst non-profitable technology companies, those that don’t make any earnings at the moment. And that has uncomfortable parallels with the dot com era…”
— Simon French [08:06]
Timestamps: [08:38] – [09:28]
No expert, however senior, can reliably time a market crash.
Referencing classic economist wisdom:
The best one can do is to "calibrate risk."
“…none of us really know how to time the market. The best investors of all time acknowledge that… the market can remain irrational longer than I can remain solvent. And that is an important message to remember.”
— Simon French [08:44]
“On the balance, there are more risky signals than I’ve seen for quite a long time in the stock market. So I’d be more cautious in that environment.”
— Simon French [09:20]
"The rebound in global stock markets, led by the US stock market, has added about $28 trillion to the value of global shares."
— Simon French [02:48]
"That measure is hovering around 40 times earnings in the US stock market. Now it’s only been there once before… at the height of the dot com bubble…"
— Simon French [04:29]
"We are talking about a tiny number of companies… to me that means you have quite a small number of potential points of failure. Which worries me somewhat."
— Katie Martin [06:26]
“The biggest rally since April is amongst non profitable technology companies… that has uncomfortable parallels with the dot com era.”
— Simon French [08:06]
"The market can remain irrational longer than I can remain solvent." (famous quote cited by Simon French) [08:44]
The episode provides listeners with a nuanced, data-driven look at the current stock market rise, its similarities to past bubbles, and why even seasoned experts find it hard to forecast a crash. Tech – especially the AI-hyped "Magnificent Seven" – drives much of the surge, creating concentration risk and familiar warning signs. There are risky signals, especially in overvaluations and the rallying of unprofitable companies, but no one can time the end of a bubble.
Caution is advised, but certainty is impossible.