
We investigate maps that suggest extremely low average IQs in developing countries
Loading summary
Charlotte Macdonald
This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the uk.
Oregon Home Care Jobs Advertiser
You can make a difference in someone's life, including your own, with a job in home care. These jobs offer flexible schedules, health care, retirement options and free training. They also provide paid time off and opportunities for overtime. Visit oregonhomecarejobs.com to learn more and apply. That's oregonhomecarejobs.com.
GoDaddy Advertiser
Running a business online look legit and own your own brand with professional tools from GoDaddy instantly build trust with your customers and boost your credibility with an email that matches your domain so people know you mean business. There's never been a better time. Just go to GoDaddy.com GDnow and choose from a wide variety of popular domains to find one that's right for you. Pair that with a professional email that works for all your business needs, from daily communications to email marketing and everything in between. That's a little price for a lot of credibility. For a limited time, get a domain and matching professional email for just 99 cents a month for one year. Go to GoDaddy.comGdNow and look legit with GoDaddy. That's GoDaddy.comGdNow again. GoDaddy.comGdNow there's never been a better time to choose the domain and email that's right for you. New customer purchases only products Auto renew separately. See terms on site godaddy.com gdnow.
Charlotte Macdonald
Hello and thanks for downloading the More or Less podcast with a programme that looks at the numbers in the news and the world all around us. And I'm Charlotte MacDonald. Today we're going to be talking about a map that often does the rounds on social media. It's quite an aesthetically pleasing map. Lots of pretty colours, but what it shows is pretty concerning. Each colour represents a country's average iq. Lower scores go through the red orange spectrum, whereas higher scores go from cool to deep blue. Areas like Europe, North America and much of Asia are different shades of blue. In contrast, the African continent looks like the different colours of a bonfire. When you look into the numbers, you realize just how low some of these scores are purported to be. A score of 100 is considered to be average, but Equatorial guinea has an average IQ score of 59, Nepal 42 and India 82. This seems crazy, but alarming data doesn't always mean wrong data. We have well developed IQ tests, so can the results ever really be that wrong? Buckle up. We're about to head into the upside down of statistical analysis.
Karim Khan
Hi, my name is Karim I'm a Biostatistics PhD student at Harvard University.
Charlotte Macdonald
When he's not writing his thesis, Karim is very much online and often finds himself debunking various versions of that IQ map. These all stem from one book, the IQ of Nations, first published in 2002.
Karim Khan
And it was by this guy, Richard Lyn and this other political scientist, Tatu Van Harlennen.
Charlotte Macdonald
Tatu Van Harnen was a professor of political science at the University of Tampere, Finland. Richard Lin was a British psychologist who dubbed himself a scientific racist and was the editor for a well known white supremacist magazine.
Karim Khan
They were trying to look at the relationship between IQ and wealth. In doing that, they needed IQ scores for all the countries.
Charlotte Macdonald
We've all heard of IQ or intelligence quotient. It's basically how well you do in a certain type of test that aims to put a score on how clever you are. The higher the score, the brainier the brain. At least in theory. If you get a score of 100, you're considered to have average intelligence, with the normal range being between 90 to 109. If you look at the intelligence map based on the IQ of nations, Japan and Taiwan take the top spots with scores of 106. This seems fair. Both countries have good education systems and their students are regularly subjected to rigorous testing. But then it all falls apart.
Karim Khan
The numbers they have for the African countries are like ridiculous. You know, like in the 50s and 60s.
Charlotte Macdonald
If this is correct and the average IQ level is 60, then these countries would have a significant amount of people whose IQ would be below 60.
Karim Khan
Basically, there's like a huge number of people that should be in the 30s and even 20s.
Charlotte Macdonald
Meaning that if you judge it by the standards in the US or Europe, large swathes of people in the African continent would have profound developmental issues, which we know is not the case. So why are the numbers so odd?
Karim Khan
They report 185 countries and of those 104. So more than half of them do not come directly from data.
Charlotte Macdonald
That'll do it. The authors found that IQ data simply didn't exist for many countries. So they estimated what the likely IQ of one country might be based on IQ data from their neighbouring countries. However, the data from these countries was often taken from very small studies that weren't necessarily an accurate representation of the whole population.
Karim Khan
They based the Equatorial guinea numbers on some kids that were in a home for the developmentally disabled. So these kids from Equatorial guinea weren't even in their home country. They were in Spain, but they weren't.
Charlotte Macdonald
The only set of questionable results.
Karim Khan
So the estimate for Somalia was based on a single sample of refugees living in a refugee camp in Kenya. The estimate for Botswana is based on 104 kids living in South Africa who were tested in English, even though English wasn't their native language. The estimate from Malawi is based on a sample of rural children where 8% never attended school, 15% dropped out. The estimate for Burkino Faso is based on rural children. The estimate for St. Vincent and the Grenadines is based on a single sample of 174 rural children. The Haitian estimate is mostly based on 133 rural 6 year olds.
Charlotte Macdonald
The list goes on.
Karim Khan
The estimate for Nepal is based on rural children and mothers who were suffering from malnutrition at the time. So this study, they were studying malnutrition as part of the study of how malnutrition was affecting this population. They collected IQ data. So the goal was to look and see how their IQs might have been reduced by malnutrition. And these are the numbers that these guys use in their analysis.
Charlotte Macdonald
The thing is, the data used isn't always bad data in itself, but it doesn't show us what Lin and some people who post the IQ map say it shows, which is that they believe some races are inherently more intelligent than others. Instead, it tells us that severe malnutrition can cause cognitive issues, that children with developmental delays have developmental delays, and that if you ask people questions in a foreign language, they might not get the answers right. So do we actually have reliable data for this?
Angela Saini
There's no way that you could have an IQ map of the world based on consistent data, because that data genuinely doesn't exist. My name's Angela Saini. I'm a science journalist. I teach science writing at mit and I've written a book on race science called Superior. There is no one standard test that everybody does universally that you could then compare the data from different countries so.
Charlotte Macdonald
The data does not exist. Even if a universal IQ test did exist, the results are likely to have a lot to do with factors way outside of your genetics.
Angela Saini
Education plays a huge role in who does well on IQ tests and who doesn't. In fact, there has been research to show that children who are adopted into wealthier families, their IQs, their intelligence test scores go up. So it's fraught on so many different levels. I really can't over emphasize just how problematic it is to try and pin down number one, what is intelligence? How do you measure it? How do you make sure that the people you're measuring it in have exactly the same level of education and access to the same kind of ideas that that test is measuring for. It's incredibly difficult.
Charlotte Macdonald
So what about this theory that one race can be more intelligent than another?
Angela Saini
Nobody's isolated a gene for intelligence, not least because this is a complex trait. So if there are genes associated with intelligence, there are very many of them. There are people who have certain talents, intellectual talents, musical talents, all kinds of things, and sometimes there is a hereditary element to that, but that's not the same as talking about race.
Charlotte Macdonald
What's more intelligent parents don't necessarily equate to super intelligent children.
Angela Saini
A child born to two exceptionally intelligent people is likely to be slightly less intelligent than both of them because of regression to the mean. So in statistical terms, you know this idea, it's a very old idea that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. There's a bit of truth to that, but the bigger truth is that intelligence varies between individuals, not between groups.
Charlotte Macdonald
So if you see someone on the Internet shouting about how much brighter one nation or one ethnicity is than another, proceed with caution. The data probably doesn't say what they think it says. That's all we have time for this week. Thank you to Karim Khan and Angela Saini. As always, if you have any questions or comments, please write in to more or less@BBC.co.uk until next week. Goodbye.
Grainger Advertiser
This is the story of the 1. As a maintenance supervisor at a manufacturing facility, he knows keeping the line up and running is a top priority. That's why he chooses Grainger, because when a drive belt gets damaged, Grainger makes it easy to find the exact specs for the replacement product he needs. And next day delivery helps ensure he'll have everything in place and running light clockwork. Call 1-800-granger. Click granger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done.
Oregon Home Care Jobs Advertiser
This is the story of the 1. As a custodial supervisor at a high school, he knows that during cold and flu season, germs spread fast. It's why he partners with Granger to stay fully stocked on the products and supplies he needs, from tissues to disinfectants to floor scrubbers, all so that he can help students, staff and teachers stay healthy and focused. Call 1-800-GRAINGER click granger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done.
Episode: What is an IQ map and can we trust them?
Host: Charlotte Macdonald (BBC Radio 4)
Date: March 15, 2025
In this episode, Charlotte Macdonald and guests critically examine the validity and meaning of widely-shared “IQ maps” that claim to show average intelligence scores for different countries around the world. The episode addresses where these numbers come from, why they’re so problematic, and the deeper issues involved when intelligence is mapped and compared globally.
“Buckle up. We’re about to head into the upside down of statistical analysis.” ([01:57])
[04:33] Karim Khan:
“The numbers they have for the African countries are like ridiculous. You know, like in the 50s and 60s.”
Problems arise because actual IQ data was unavailable for many countries.
Striking examples:
Karim Khan:
“The estimate for Nepal is based on rural children and mothers suffering from malnutrition...they were studying malnutrition as part of the study…And these are the numbers these guys use in their analysis.” ([06:44])
“There’s no way that you could have an IQ map of the world based on consistent data, because that data genuinely doesn’t exist.”
“Education plays a huge role in who does well on IQ tests and who doesn’t. In fact, there has been research to show that children who are adopted into wealthier families, their IQs…go up.”
“Nobody’s isolated a gene for intelligence, not least because this is a complex trait…There are people who have certain talents…and sometimes there is a hereditary element to that, but that’s not the same as talking about race.”
“A child born to two exceptionally intelligent people is likely to be slightly less intelligent than both of them because of regression to the mean…intelligence varies between individuals, not between groups.” ([09:41])
“If you see someone on the Internet shouting about how much brighter one nation or one ethnicity is than another, proceed with caution. The data probably doesn’t say what they think it says.”
Charlotte Macdonald [01:57]:
“Buckle up. We’re about to head into the upside down of statistical analysis.”
Karim Khan [05:11]:
“They report 185 countries and of those 104. So more than half of them do not come directly from data.”
Karim Khan [06:44]:
“The estimate for Nepal is based on rural children and mothers who were suffering from malnutrition at the time…And these are the numbers that these guys use in their analysis.”
Angela Saini [07:48]:
“There’s no way that you could have an IQ map of the world based on consistent data, because that data genuinely doesn’t exist.”
Angela Saini [08:27]:
“Education plays a huge role in who does well on IQ tests and who doesn’t…It’s fraught on so many different levels. I really can’t overemphasize just how problematic it is to try and pin down number one, what is intelligence?”
Angela Saini [09:41]:
“A child born to two exceptionally intelligent people is likely to be slightly less intelligent than both of them because of regression to the mean…intelligence varies between individuals, not between groups.”
Charlotte Macdonald [10:06]:
“If you see someone on the Internet shouting about how much brighter one nation or one ethnicity is than another, proceed with caution.”
This episode rigorously debunks widely-held misconceptions about national and racial variations in intelligence as depicted by popular “IQ maps.” Experts highlight the deeply flawed methodologies, lack of reliable data, and the overwhelming influence of social, environmental, and educational factors on IQ test outcomes. The hosts urge listeners to treat these maps—and their racist misinterpretations—with extreme skepticism and to recognize intelligence as a complex, individual trait not meaningfully mapped across nations or ethnicities.