
A guide to 2013 in numbers - the most informative, interesting and idiosyncratic of by...
Loading summary
Tim Harford
This is the short edition of More or Less, first broadcast on the BBC World Service.
BBC Announcer
Thank you for downloading from the BBC. For details of our complete range of podcasts and our terms of use, go to bbcworldservice.com podcasts
Tim Harford
hello and welcome to More or Less on the BBC World Service. I'm Tim Harford. It is, of course, 2014. Happy New Year. But before we look forward this week, we'd like to look back at some of the most intriguing, striking or just plain delightful numbers of last year. And what better place to start than with Dr. Pippa Malgren, founder of Principalis Asset Management and former financial market adviser to President George W. Bush?
Dr. Pippa Malgren
For me, the most interesting number this year is the number 73. It's the periodic table number for an element nobody's ever heard of called tantalum. And yet we're incredibly dependent on this rare earth metal. It's essential for all telecommunications, defense equipment. Your mobile phone won't work without it. And I think it's interesting because it serves as a reminder that in the world economy, lots of the most important things that we need are actually very limited in the supply. And there are lots of things that in the world economy that we need to think about, the limits on the supply. And I don't mean this as like a tree hugging green person. It's not an environmental issue. I mean, we assume that there's always enough finance to pull something like tantalum out of the ground, when in fact, we continue to have a problem with banks lending because they're so inhibited by their own debt problem. Food is another issue. We sort of assume that somehow, yes, with technology, we'll be able to feed the world. We forget that phosphates are essential to the production of food. And like tantalum, it's a rare thing. It's hard to make. And to build a factory today that can make phosphates, you won't get any return on your capital for 15 years. So right now nobody's prepared to fund that. So. So this is another example of things like mined assets. We just take for granted that you pull stuff out of the ground when you need it. What's the shortage of talent today to dig the stuff out of the ground? For the last 25 years, if you had any math skills, you went into finance because that paid the most. And I think this year is really interesting because it's the first year that the graduates of the Colorado School of Mines, which is America's best engineering school, will be paid more than Harvard Business School. Graduates, thus enticing young people with masculine to actually go back into the real economy, which is a great thing. But it means we've also got a global shortage of engineers right now. So, again, you assume if you need something like tantalum, you just get it. Yeah, well, guess what? We don't have enough engineers, and we probably won't for some years to come until we fix and redress this imbalance. So tantalum, we really literally wouldn't have the global economy we have today without it.
Tim Harford
Pippa Malmgun, My next guest is Merryn Somerset Webb, the editor in chief of Money Week.
My number of the year this year is $142 million. That's the price that a set of three studies by Francis Bacon sold for at auction at the beginning of November. That is the highest price ever for a piece of artwork at auction in nominal terms. And to me, this shows us the way that quantitative easing across the world has leached into real asset prices. We knew it would happen. It was forecast by the central banks, but I think it's happened to a slightly more extreme level than any of expected.
Merryn Somerset Webb
So quantitative easing, is this printing money, to put it crudely, or central banks creating money? Why would that drive up the price of Francis Bacon paintings?
Tim Harford
Well, there's an awful lot of arguments about how quantitative easing money gets into the asset markets. But the best way to look at it, I think, is as though it's a hot potato, you know, so the central bank buys an asset from somebody, buys a bond of some kind, whatever, hands the money to the guy who had the bond. The guy who had the bond now has the money. What's he going to do with the money? He's going to buy something else. So maybe he goes and he buys an equity. The guy who had the equity now has the money. He goes and buys something else. You've injected money into the economy and people are shifting it from person to person to person to person, buying new assets, and eventually it ends up all over the place. So you can look at the price of prime housing across the world. You can look at the price of classic cars, another thing that's going completely berserk. And you can look at art prices, and then of course, you can look at stock markets, again, all going completely berserk for no obvious fundamental reason.
And should we look at this as
Merryn Somerset Webb
a successful stimulation of the global economy, which of course is what it was designed to do, or should we look at it as something that's simply making the rich like the people who Already owned portraits by Francis Bacon and so on. Making the rich richer while nobody else benefits. Or is it doing a bit of both?
Tim Harford
It's doing a bit of both, but more of the helping the rich. I think at this point you have to remember that without QE we probably would have had very severe deflation in the end. And I think at this point you'd be hard pushed to find anyone who would say that the first little bit of QE wasn't a good idea. It prevented a deflationary collapse. But I think at this point almost everybody would say that QE is effectively now a fiscal policy in that it's a redistribution policy. It's shifting money from the not so well off to the well off, and therefore it's no longer a policy that central banks should be following.
Merryn Somerset Webb
And when do you think central banks are going to stop?
Tim Harford
I don't think they're ever going to stop, really. I think once. Once. Once you've let a genie like this out of the bottle, how do you stop? How do you stop when you stop? You have to accept that markets around the world will fall and you have to be ready for that. It's a really tough thing for a central banker to do. I mean, of course it will happen one day, but I think the tightening of monetary policy will probably take quite a lot longer than any of us expect. When it comes, it'll come fast, but I think it'll be a way off. You've got to be a very, very brave central banker to be the one who stands up and says, I don't care if the stock market crashes.
Merryn Somerset Webb
And let's be clear what we think of as an end to qe. I mean, is this an end to the process of creating new money? Is this destroying the new money that was previously created, hoovering it back out of the economy? Or is it something else? Is it raising interest rates and not affecting the money supply at all?
Tim Harford
Well, obviously they're very different. QE and raising interest rates. When I talk about the end of qe, I'm talking about the end of printing more. I find it almost impossible to imagine the process of pulling all the money out of the economy. That seems very unlikely.
Merrin, Somerset Webb. The actual winning bid for Francis Bacon's Three Studies of Lucian Freud was a mere $127 million. But the buyer needed to look down the back of the sofa for the $15.4 million commission. That took the total cost to $142.4 million. Now, that's a big number. But we know a bigger one and it's a prime number. A very special kind of prime number. It's a Mersenne prime. Mersenne primes are named after a 17th century French monk, and as of last year, only 47 had been found. Geeky songstress Helen Arney takes up the story.
Helen Arney
In January, Professor Curtis Cooper found a number. Not an ordinary number but a number that's humongous. So I don't want your mulled pies and you can keep your minced wine. Cause all I want for Christmas Is the world's biggest prime it's two to the power of 578-851-61 minus 1 Mersenne 48 the perfect gift for everyone so give me, oh give me this Christmas time a 17 million digit Christmas prime It's rarer than a cracker joke that actually makes you laugh as useless as a pair of roller skates for a giraffe if I had one I could do whatever I like with it well, anything I want apart from dividing it except by itself and 1 is 2 to the power of 578-851-6 1 minus 1 if I tried to sing it in hours I'd need 1181 so give me a, give me this Christmas time a 17 million digit Christmas prime so type it and text it or write it and post it Bake it in bread and then slice it and toast it if you can't calculate it and send it in time I'll accept 16 million decimal places of pie so give me, I'll give me this Christmas time a 17 million digit Christmas prime one more recursion give me, I'll give me me this Christmas dime a 17 million digit Christmas prime
Tim Harford
Helen Arney pining after Merzen 48 if there are any numbers you'd like us to have a look at, do email us. Our address is more or lessbc.co.uk and you can download this program and previous editions at our website, bbcworldservice.com/more or less.
BBC Announcer
There are dozens of different podcasts now available from the BBC, including news, documentaries, science, business, arts and sports. For details of them all, go to bbcworldservice.com podcasts.
First Broadcast: January 4, 2014
Host: Tim Harford
In this special New Year’s edition, Tim Harford and guests look back at some of the most intriguing and surprising numbers from 2013, exploring what they reveal about our world. The figures chosen span economics, rare elements, and even record-breaking mathematics, with expert insight and a little festive fun.
Guest: Dr. Pippa Malgren, founder of Principalis Asset Management
Timestamp: [00:46]
“Lots of the most important things that we need are actually very limited in the supply.” (Dr. Pippa Malgren, [01:13])
“For the last 25 years, if you had any math skills, you went into finance because that paid the most. ... This year is really interesting because it's the first year that the graduates of the Colorado School of Mines ... will be paid more than Harvard Business School graduates.” (Dr. Pippa Malgren, [02:16])
Guest: Merryn Somerset Webb, Editor in Chief of Money Week
Timestamp: [03:04]
“You've injected money into the economy and people are shifting it from person to person... and eventually it ends up all over the place.” (Tim Harford, [03:52])
“It's doing a bit of both, but more of the helping the rich. ...It's shifting money from the not so well off to the well off, and therefore it's no longer a policy that central banks should be following.” (Tim Harford, [04:45])
“I don't think they're ever going to stop, really. ...You've got to be a very, very brave central banker to be the one who stands up and says, I don't care if the stock market crashes.” (Tim Harford, [05:18])
Guest: Helen Arney, musical comedian and self-described “geeky songstress”
Timestamp: [07:02]
“If I had one I could do whatever I like with it, well, anything I want apart from dividing it except by itself and 1.” (Helen Arney, [07:34])
“If I tried to sing it in hours, I'd need 1,181.” (Helen Arney, [07:48])
Scarcity and Talent:
“We just take for granted that you pull stuff out of the ground when you need it. ...Guess what? We don't have enough engineers, and we probably won't for some years to come until we fix and redress this imbalance.”
(Dr. Pippa Malgren, [02:38])
QE as a “hot potato”:
“The best way to look at it, I think, is as though it's a hot potato.”
(Tim Harford, [03:48])
Largest Prime Number Song:
“So give me, oh give me, this Christmas time, a 17 million digit Christmas prime.”
(Helen Arney, [07:12])