Nephilim Death Squad

Episode: The Final Moment: Did the Jews Get Indy?
Date: December 29, 2025
Hosts: Top Lobsta, David Lee Corbo (The Raven), Matt Hepner
Main Theme:
This episode features the hosts reviewing and analyzing Timothy Albarino’s point-by-point commentary of the documentary "The Age of Disclosure"—a UFO/alien-focused film. Using a Biblical worldview, they critique the implications of the mainstream disclosure narrative, the supposed clash between "secrecy" and "disclosure" groups at high levels of government, and the theological and social consequences of embracing the "alien phenomenon" as literal, physical, and non-demonic. They contrast Albarino’s present approach with his earlier, more apocalyptic and Biblically-centered stance on alien disclosure as a harbinger of the Antichrist.

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. Setting the Stage: Documentary Debrief & Expectations (03:03 – 06:55)

• The team establishes that they're reviewing Albarino’s review of "The Age of Disclosure," having recently watched both the documentary itself and previous related episodes.
• The initial mood is skeptical—previous content let them down, but they're tentatively optimistic about Albarino’s analysis.

"Guys, we're gonna figure it out here in this episode. It's probably gonna be two episodes because it's a long review." – Top Lobsta (01:45)

2. The Psyop and Mainstream Disclosure Narrative (03:12 – 11:20)

• The hosts dissect the documentary’s format, noting its chilling similarity to COVID-era media coverage—relying on expert talking heads, repetition, and psychological manipulation.
• Albarino praises the caliber of the interviewees: high-level government officials, intelligence community members, scientists, congressmen, and even Marco Rubio (now Secretary of State).

"It's compelling because... they took the exact same coronavirus format and then did the same exact format with this." – Matt (10:08)

• The hosts suggest the documentary is engineered as a “Mockingbird Media” psyop to control the narrative around alien disclosure.

3. The “Caliber of Experts” & Their Testimonies (09:45 – 13:10)

• Albarino repeatedly fixates on the authority and credibility of the documentary’s talking heads as if this in itself verifies the phenomenon’s existence and threat level.
• Hosts point out his “glazing” over the experts—a subtle critique of hero worship and the fallacy of taking authority figures at face value.

"You know, really. He really likes these people." – The Raven (12:15)

• They express frustration with the lack of deeper spiritual or critical analysis—being satisfied with authoritative assertion over genuine truth-seeking.

4. The Grays: Demons or Aliens? Theological Divide (20:09 – 23:55)

(Crux theme, reappearing throughout)

• Albarino maintains a strict division—aliens are non-human physical entities, not “demons”; government experts and whistleblowers support this physical, non-human narrative.
• The hosts (especially Top Lobsta and The Raven) rail against this, insisting the ancient Biblical language (“angels,” “Nephilim,” “fallen ones”) captures the same phenomena—highlighting the risk of rebranding a spiritual deception under new, sanitized terminology.

"Get rid of the extraterrestrials, say angels, fallen angels, whatever. Use the terminology that already exists, that has a much better grasp on the nature of these things." – Top Lobsta (23:24)

5. The Collins Elite and Religious “Gatekeeping” (36:48–44:51)

• The episode delves into Albarino’s critique of the “Collins Elite”: a real or alleged group of Christian fundamentalists in the Pentagon, supposedly suppressing disclosure because they believe aliens are demons and that studying/contacting them is sorcery.
• Albarino frames their actions as “misguided” and “foolish,” criticizing Christians who don't want to “look at” the phenomenon in search of truth.

"Can you put this position that this is all demonic and we should look at it? Completely misguided. I think it's actually quite foolish." – Timothy Albarino (48:38)

• The hosts debate whether such Christians in high government actually exist, or if this is a manufactured narrative to discredit spiritual dissent.
• They point out that such “discernment” (avoiding occult contact) is not irrational but Biblically prudent, warning that spiritual forces often masquerade as higher beings to enslave, not enlighten.

"If you immerse yourself in this, it's going to take over... We still do our fair part of look, and I'm not arguing that we shouldn't look at it. I'm just saying you want to look at it so bad, you'll make the other viewpoint diminutive." – The Raven (50:10)

6. On Disclosure: “Truth,” National Security, and Psyop

• Albarino emerges as a pro-disclosure advocate, claiming the public “has a right to know,” and that sunlight is the “greatest disinfectant.” He repeatedly returns to the governmental “architecture” of secrecy and the octopus-like compartmentalization aimed at obscuring truth—even from high-ranking officials.
• The hosts, while acknowledging benefits of truth exposure, warn that the disclosure movement is already an orchestrated revelation, likely controlled by the same powers that implemented the coverup, and potentially serving the “Great Deception” referenced in Christian prophecy (see 2 Thess 2:9–12).

7. Who are the “Aliens” and What’s Their Motive? (118:17–122:44, 167:06–171:10)

• Albarino reviews credible whistleblower testimony describing “Grays,” “Insectoids,” “Nordics,” and (alleged) “Reptilians,” but, he claims, not all should be considered threats.
• He contends the physical phenomenon is “ironclad,” yet remains ambiguous about the actual spiritual/metaphysical origin, drifting from his earlier warnings that the Antichrist will emerge from the disclosure movement.
• The hosts critique this “neutral” approach, seeing it as a watering down of Albarino’s previous Biblical stance.

"That's the crazy part. I think that's the real clever thing. They march their automatons out in front of us. They've been taking us against our will, paralyzing us, filling us with fear, taking our babies, mutilating our livestock, etc. Etc. They come down, they destroy their own toys in front of us, and they go, where are your saviors? That's the, that's the move. And I think that's what we're gonna be subjected to." – Top Lobsta (201:00)

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments (w/ Timestamps)

• On the “Expert” Narrative:
  "It's compelling because you're a wanker... They took the exact same coronavirus format and then did the same exact format with this."
  – Matt Hepner (10:08)

• On Albarino’s Change Over Time:
  "Where is this guy who was standing on those megalithic structures saying all that dope shit? Did he die 10 years ago? Is this a body double?"
  – Top Lobsta (181:13)

• On “Grandma Maxing:”
  "The grandma who says demonic and doesn't know a thing about them, just labels them demonic and then orients towards Christ and keeps moving that direction is the one who wins. You don't need all the information."
  – Top Lobsta (199:13)

• On the Great Deception & False Choices:
  "Right between them, there's a narrow path. You take that one."
  – Top Lobsta (198:39)

• On Albarino’s Approach:
  "His job is to sound profound, but say absolutely nothing. And he has the answers to lead you towards a conclusion... Your soul is in jeopardy here. And he has a conclusion and he could bring you to a conclusion that would save your soul in five minutes—not five hours."
  – Top Lobsta (106:12)

• On “Disclosure Hysteria:”
  "Am I wrong? Am I judging him too harshly, given the nature of what it's about? It's about the Antichrist. It's about your salvation. It's about what they called the great deception in that film..."
  – Top Lobsta (183:49)

Time-Stamped Segment Guide (Highlights)

• Intro banter & setup: 01:36 – 03:12
• Psyop, narrative construction: 03:12 – 11:22
• Caliber of experts; critique: 09:45 – 13:12
• Demons or aliens? Theological framing: 20:09 – 24:02
• Collins Elite, Christian “gatekeepers”: 36:48 – 44:51
• Shrinking spiritual context: 48:38 – 54:07
• Albarino pro-disclosure stance: 69:02 – 70:04
• Aliens’ motives and “species”: 118:17 – 122:44, 167:06–171:10
• Existential threat & NWO: 167:19 – 171:29
• Concluding reflection/disappointment: 183:05 – 201:00
• Final summation toward practical faith: 199:12 – 201:42

Tone and Language

• Cutting, irreverent, and deeply skeptical. The hosts employ sarcasm, self-deprecating humor, and “locker-room” banter while wrestling sincerely with the big questions.
• Blunt and explicit when critiquing both the government and the “Christian media complex,” they spare neither side in their dissection of spiritual and conspiratorial narratives.

Final Assessment

Hosts’ Core Critique:

Albarino, once a bold Biblical “watchman” warning of the alien deception as a Great Deception and arrival of the Antichrist, is now cast as compromised—delivering safe, polished, and ultimately inconclusive analysis for mass palatability. In downplaying the demonic and Biblically prophetic dimension, he’s lost his edge and, in their eyes, failed at the core responsibility of spiritual truth-telling in this arena.

"If it doesn't point to Christ, I don't want it." – Top Lobsta (189:12)

Practical Takeaway:

For the hosts, discernment trumps disclosure. Stay in the Word, recognize the ancient spiritual backdrop to “new” UFO phenomena, and beware of both mainstream and alternative “saviors” (be they aliens, Q, or antichrist figures). If grandma’s instinct says “it’s demonic”—that’s probably the safest place to stand.

End of Summary.