Loading summary
Eric Baker
Close your eyes. Exhale. Feel your body relax and let go of whatever you're carrying today.
1-800-Contacts Advertiser
Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-contacts. Oh my gosh, they're so fast.
Kim Adams
And breathe.
1-800-Contacts Advertiser
Oh, sorry. I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order. Oh, sorry. Namaste. Visit 1-800-contacts.com today to save on your first order.
Kim Adams
1-800-contacts.
Eric Baker
Seguramente estas manejando entrenando oasindo tarreas aora mismo tip rapido TikTok no e solo entretenimiento. Ay, encuentron TikTok. Ahora. Welcome to the New Books Network.
Kim Adams
Hi theory.
Saronik Basu
Welcome to High Theory.
Kim Adams
In this podcast, we get high on the substance of theory. I'm Kim Adams.
Saronik Basu
And I'm Saronik Basu.
Kim Adams
We are two tired academics trying to save critique from. From itself.
Saronik Basu
Hello and welcome to High Theory. My name is Sharonik. Today we are here with Eric Baker. And Eric is going to tell me what all the good side hustles are. No, that's not true. But he is going to tell me what entrepreneurial work ethic is. But before we do that, Eric, would you mind introducing yourself to our listeners?
Eric Baker
Yes. Hi. Thanks for having me on. I'm a lecturer in the history of science department at Harvard. My work is in associate editor at the magazine the Drift. And I just come out with a new book called make youe Own how the Entrepreneurial Work Ethic Exhausted America.
Saronik Basu
Thank you so much for coming to High Theory. What the heck is entrepreneurial work ethic?
Eric Baker
Yeah, so I, I distinguish between the, the entrepreneurial work ethic and, and other work ethics. You know, we just talk about the work ethic period where maybe the Protestant work ethic, the. But you know, what I want to say is that these cultural scripts and sets of ideas that explain why we ought to work more than we strictly need to from material necessity, right? These, these vary over time. You know, they're, they're not static and that they're, they're also responsive to, to people's material experience of, of the world of work, of, of modern capitalism. And so I distinguish between a series of, of work ethics, at least in history. And in particular, I contrast the entrepreneurial work ethic with what I call the industrious work ethic, which is, I think, kind of the regnant cultural framework for making sense of work in the late 19th century, which emphasizes the importance of persistence, the nose to the grindstone, essentially just doing your work. The work that's kind of allotted to you by circumstance, by fate, regardless of how rewarding it is. There's actually a popular success tract at this time called Blessed Be Drudgery, which really, I think, kind of sums up the spirit. But the entrepreneurial work ethic is in some ways an answer to the question of what do you do if there isn't even drudgery? And this is increasingly something that American workers start to worry about in the 20th century. Even professional successful workers, they're frequently worried about changes in the structure of industry and economic trends, sort of making their work obsolete, leaving them behind in the sort of incessant transformation of capitalism. And so the prescription is that you constantly need to be creating new work. It's not just enough to do your work, but the importance of creating work for oneself. And then the kind of ultimate heroic virtue in the framework of the entrepreneurial work ethic is creating work not just for yourself, but for others. Being a job creator, it comes to be known later in the 20th century. So that's the entrepreneurial work ethic in a nutshell. It's not just enough to work anymore, but you also need to be coming up with new work, staying one step ahead of the market.
Saronik Basu
Right. So I know that we are going to talk about our own contemporary times and the way that. The way in which we immerse ourselves in work, but can I just stay a little bit longer on the history of it? A little bit? And can I ask you how to trace the history of the entrepreneurial work ethic in, you know, in American class relations, for example? Because not everybody historically has felt this urge.
Eric Baker
Well, so it's. That's exactly right. It's never homogenous. There's always a great deal of contradictory ideological impulses in any culture. My kind of source base in the book is twofold. On the one hand, I spent a lot of time considering popular success literature. And, you know, this actually does cut widely across American class structure to an extent that surprised me when I began to do this research. But these are books that often kind of strike professional intellectual historians like myself as kind of lowbrow, kind of vulgar. But this is exactly what makes them, I think, interesting and important sources for reconstructing genuinely kind of popular cultural history. I also spend a lot of time considering the work that's coming out of American business schools. It's being pushed by professional management consultants. You know, what I call Management expertise. And what is striking to me, again, something that really surprised me over the course of doing the research, is exactly how much harmony there is between the dominant ethos prescribed by management experts and the kinds of ideas that are circulating in a much more popular sort of mass market kind of setting. You know, often similar, similar slogans, similar ideas, a similar kind of diagnosis of the challenges that the development of modern capitalism poses to the worker. And the concept of entrepreneurship that crystallizes over the course of the 20th century is also something that almost kind of paradoxically transcends class hierarchy in this way. If you ask someone to, like, picture an entrepreneur, chances are they'll either picture someone like Elon Musk or they'll picture an Uber driver. I mean, these are the kind of paradox that these two sort of opposing figures in the sense of wealth and power, you know, nonetheless are sort of both kind of icons of this idea of entrepreneurship.
Saronik Basu
Yeah, yeah. My second question is how do we use the entrepreneurial work ethic? And I really want to know how different, I don't want to say different constituencies use them because, you know, how does the capitalist use them? How does the, I don't know, the freelancer use it? And how do intellectual historians use it to talk about American history?
Eric Baker
Again, depending on where, on where you fit this, this concept can do different things for you. You know, for a lot of people, the entrepreneurial work ethic is kind of a solution to the problem of economic precarity. And again, I think that this is true not just at the. At the bottom of American class structure, but often, you know, in many sort of fairly remunerative professional sectors. I think that there's a lot of advice that academics get to be entrepreneurial, for example, that I think is pretty clearly correlated with the scarcity of, of work that many of us confront. The idea here is that if you, if you can't count on the work that's here today being there tomorrow, then it becomes necessary to somehow stay one step ahead of the curve. And the idea that this involves cultivating a certain set of personality traits or kind of mental habits, which is really the kind of substance of a lot of the advice that I trace in the book. This can be reassuring news to people, you know, even if those hopes are often frustrated. You know, for managers, the entrepreneurial work ethic is a way of presenting oneself as, you know, something more than a kind of normal, boring manager. If styling yourself as an entrepreneurial manager, someone who's kind of creating new work, you know, management experts have. Have long argued that this can help managers sort of transform the vibe of a company. In some ways it makes it more like a kind of charismatic community. People are sort of looking, looking to the future. It's driven by some sort of transformative mission rather than just sort of executing in a routine bureaucratic manner. So management experts argue this, this makes workers more loyal. It makes them likely to sort of take on entrepreneurial attributes in their own right, to sort of figure out how to solve problems themselves. And so a lot of the advice that's geared at managers, it encourages them to model the entrepreneurial virtues for their workforce. The hope that workers will really kind of buy in, and this will make them both more loyal and more productive simultaneously, more generally. My hope with this book is that by naming this concept, by telling its history and giving people the resources to see it in action, that people can acquire a, a bit of critical distance from it. I think that this is something that the intellectual history can be really good at, is sort of picking out these ideas that are often taken for granted or sort of tacit, or are thought to be kind of timeless, just kind of commonsensical and showing that they're contingent, they have a history, and that means that they can be rethought.
Saronik Basu
I'm really interested in the rhetoric of the advice literature that you are reading. And I'm wondering, in order to kind of score rhetorical points, what are the kind of obverses of entrepreneurial work ethic that are, I don't know, demonized? Like, is it leisure? Is it like sticking to a 95 thing?
Eric Baker
All of the above, you know, really the ultimate villain in the world of the entrepreneurial work ethic is the bureaucrat. And, and right now we see Musk going into Washington and railing against the bureaucrats and his kind of entrepreneurial project. His spirit is going to replace the spirit of the bureaucrats. But yeah, in general, there's a sense of complacency. This is really the, the sort of ultimate whore in the mind of the advocates of, of entrepreneurialism. There's one management theorist I discuss in the book who's writing about the origins of McDonald's and the role of Ray Kroc, who is the CEO that really turned it into a big business. And he's distinguishing between Ray Kroc and the McDonald's brothers who founded the first restaurant and developed its kind of fast food system and the first couple of franchises. And he essentially says they never aspired to turn McDonald's into a billion dollar business. They were basically content with their couple of stores making hamburgers. It's that kind of contentment, the fact that they weren't aiming to turn McDonald's into an American institution, even though they were business owners, they weren't true entrepreneurs. Whereas Ray Kroc, you know, even though he was not technically the founder of McDonald's, he was the driving force who aspired to keep McDonald's constantly growing, scaling it up, constantly coming out with new products and new techniques and new, know, marketing schemes and everything. And it was that insatiable spirit that, that made him a true, the True Entrepreneur of McDonald.
Saronik Basu
Final question. How will the entrepreneurial work ethic save the world?
Eric Baker
Well, I'll give a kind of paradoxical answer to this, which is that I hope that my, my critique of the entrepreneurial work ethic can help help save the world by challenging our kind of culture of striving to save the world, setting that expectation for ourselves as individual workers. There's a tweet I quote from before he acquired the platform where Elon Musk says something like, no one ever changed the world on 40 hours a week. And this to me really kind of cuts to the heart of the entrepreneurial work ethic and I think also is a great illustration of what I see is its kind of toxic, exhausting character, as the subtitle has it. And so I think that the lesson of the entrepreneurial work ethic, in some sense, the fundamental irony is that in a culture where sort of changing the world becomes the expectation that we all place on ourselves as individuals and work, this ultimately has kind of pretty profound socially and politically conservative effects that kind of locks people in. It helps to actually kind of stabilize our economic system to keep people locked in the same economic roles chasing this kind of dream. So if we are to change the world, it has to be together. It has to be collectively. And I think that means challenging the entrepreneurial work ethic that all of us, to some extent, I think, have internalized.
Saronik Basu
Yeah, I honestly can't think of a better note to end on. Eric, thank you so much for coming to High Theory and talking to us about the entrepreneurial work ethic. Thank you again and we look forward to your future work.
Kim Adams
Thank you so much and thank you for listening to High Theory.
Saronik Basu
If you like our podcast, please review and subscribe wherever you get your podcast fixed.
Kim Adams
Owen Quinn composes our theme music. Asia Garcia edited this episode and Lily Epstein supplied the image.
Saronik Basu
We are getting off social media, but if you would like to know what we are up to, please subscribe to our patreon for free.
Kim Adams
Paid subscribers will get episodes without ads and warm, fuzzy feelings.
Saronik Basu
You can find High Theory on the New Books Network and also on hightheory.net
Kim Adams
we hope you have a highly theoretical.
Athletic Brewing Co. Advertiser
This episode is brought to you by Athletic Brewing Co. No matter how you do game day, on the couch, in the crowd, or manning the snack table, Athletic Brewing fits right in with a full lineup of non alcoholic beer styles you can enjoy bold flavored all game long. No hangovers, no buzz, no subbing out for water in the second half. Stock the fridge for tip off with a variety of non alcoholic craft styles. Available at your local grocery store or online at athleticbrewing.com near Beer Fit for All Times.
Podcast: New Books Network – High Theory
Date: March 16, 2026
Host: Saronik Basu with Kim Adams
Guest: Eric Baker (Lecturer, History of Science, Harvard; Associate Editor, The Drift)
Focus: Eric Baker discusses his new book, Make Your Own: How the Entrepreneurial Work Ethic Exhausted America, and unpacks the history, influence, and critiques of the entrepreneurial work ethic in American society.
In this episode, Saronik Basu and Kim Adams interview Eric Baker about his latest book, Make Your Own: How the Entrepreneurial Work Ethic Exhausted America. The conversation explores how the ideal of the "entrepreneurial work ethic" has shaped American attitudes toward work, tracing its historical origins, cultural impacts, and present-day consequences. Baker analyzes how this ethic is both a product of and response to shifting economic realities, while also critiquing the pervasive pressures it places on individuals in both professional and personal contexts.
[02:08]
[04:56]
[07:18]
[10:10]
[12:16]
Defining the Ethic:
"It's not just enough to work anymore, but you also need to be coming up with new work, staying one step ahead of the market."
— Eric Baker [03:31]
Transcending Class:
"...almost paradoxically transcends class hierarchy... Elon Musk or an Uber driver... both kind of icons of this idea of entrepreneurship."
— Eric Baker [06:15]
The Complacent Villain:
"The ultimate villain in the world of the entrepreneurial work ethic is the bureaucrat."
— Eric Baker [10:30]
Ray Kroc as Entrepreneur Archetype:
"...it was that insatiable spirit that, that made him the True Entrepreneur of McDonald's."
— Eric Baker [11:56]
Critique of Overwork as Virtue:
"No one ever changed the world on 40 hours a week... is a great illustration of what I see is its kind of toxic, exhausting character."
— Eric Baker [12:38]
Call for Collective Change:
"If we are to change the world, it has to be together. It has to be collectively. And I think that means challenging the entrepreneurial work ethic that all of us... have internalized."
— Eric Baker [13:40]
This episode offers a penetrating and accessible critique of the entrepreneurial work ethic’s origins, functions, and influence on American culture. With clear historical insight, Eric Baker exposes the pressures and contradictions embedded in modern attitudes toward work and productivity, questioning the universal benefits of constant striving and the myth of the heroic individual entrepreneur. The conversation ends with a call for collective reimagining of what meaningful work and social change might look like—together, not just as individuals.