
Loading summary
Andrew Limbong
Hey, it's NPR's Book of the Day. I'm Andrew Limbong. Lucian Kim was formerly NPR's international correspondent based in Moscow, and he's got an expansive new book out titled Putin's why Russia Invaded Ukraine. It's a look back at the root causes of the war and everything that's led up to where we are now. And what I didn't expect in this interview between Kim and Here and Now's Robin Young was the outsized presence of President George W. Bush, the US President who Kim says had the biggest influence on the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. He explains why.
Robin Young
After the break, this message comes from Thrive Market. The food industry is a multi billion dollar industry, but not everything on the shelf is made with your health in mind. At Thrive Market, they go beyond the standards, curating the highest quality products for you and your family while focusing on organic first and restricting more than 1,000 harmful ingredients, all shipped at your door. Shop at a grocery store that actually cares for your health@thrivemarket.com podcast for 30% off your first order plus a $60 free gift.
Lucien Kim
Why did Putin invade Ukraine? That's the simple question at the heart of a deep new book from former NPR Moscow correspondent Lucien Kim. And a couple of hundred pages later, we have a pretty robust answer. Yes, the root cause was a legacy of Russian imperialism, which Ukraine, the breadbasket, played a key role in We Vladimir Putin, a former KGB agent, wanted to resurrect the collapsed Soviet Union. But for Putin, it was also personal. The name of the book is Putin's Why Russia Invaded Ukraine. It begins with Ukraine's 2004 popular uprising, the Orange Revolution, in which Ukrainians installed their candidate, Viktor Yushchenko, as president even after Putin rigged the election and ends with an increasingly isolated Putin during COVID and as Lucien writes, a confluence of factors that led to his unprovoked so now the bloody consequences on both sides are stalled like some grim old master's mural waiting for a promised peace deal. Luchin is a senior Ukraine analyst with the International Crisis Group. He joins us in the studio. Welcome.
Great to be here, Robin.
We've spoken to you so many times over the years. You've covered this conflict or this story out of the Soviet Union, then Russia and Ukraine for what, over 20 years? That's right, yeah. You are drawn to what, by the way, when it comes to Vladimir Putin?
I think I was drawn by Russia and the story of an empire that had collapsed, an empire that stretched from Prague all the way to Pyongyang. I wouldn't Say, I was drawn by the personality of Putin, though I certainly viewed him the whole time as a historical figure of great dimensions.
Yeah. And with quite a wake behind him at this point. And so start with 2004, the Orange Revolution. That's the color that people wore when they took to the streets. Ukraine, no longer a Soviet satellite, but also moving away from Russian control. Putin visits interferes almost laughably in the election. I mean, it's so obvious that he's doing that. What are we learning there? That is a thread that we can pull to the invasion.
Well, as you said, in the 2004 presidential elections in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin was pushing for the prime minister to become President, Viktor Yanukovych. And he spent quite a lot of time campaigning. And they rigged the election to make Yanukovych. Ukrainians took to the streets and they reversed the outcome of that rigged election through a people power revolution. The election was held again, and a pro Western candidate ended up winning that election. And I think for Vladimir Putin, that was a key moment. He decided that this was a Western, maybe even US plot to draw former Soviet satellite states away from Moscow and to encroach on what he saw as his sphere of influence.
Enter George W. Bush. You say that he, more than any other US President, helped shape Ukraine's coming confrontation with Russia. Explain that.
Right. George W. Bush is a US President now who is drifting into the past. But what occurred to me was the outsized role that George W. Bush played. George W. Bush had a very good personal relationship with Vladimir Putin. Russia was the country that he visited most in his presidency. He saw Putin at various meetings around the world something like 40 times. So there was definitely some kind of personal bond. And at the same time, we saw a drifting already in relations because of his aggressive foreign policy in places like Iraq, which alienated Putin.
Right. Well, Bush was mocked mercilessly for saying that one time that he met Putin and got a sense of his soul. People said, no, this is a soulless man. Bush did seem to have an ability to warm Putin up just a little bit for a small window. Putin came to the U.S. post 9 11. He did a call in show with Americans on NPR. There seemed to be opportunity there. But was the biggest division the reason you say Bush might have helped shape the war that was to come between Russia and Ukraine? Was it because of Bush's push for Ukraine to join NATO and giving Ukraine the expectation that they would be able to join NATO?
Sure. So what we had going on here was on one level, Putin was reaching out to George W. Bush, and even offered support for the invasion of Afghanistan. That partially explains the title Putin's Revenge, because Putin felt shunned after that moment. He felt that he had reached out to help the United States and that help had been rejected, which burned very heavily despite the fact that he had such a good personal relationship. On the other track, we have George W. Bush and Ukraine. And Ukraine played an important role in the occupation of Iraq because Ukraine participated in the so called coalition of the willing and put up its own troops to go to Iraq. It was one way of Ukraine showing its openness to the United States as well. And George W. Bush sought to reward Ukraine by offering a roadmap into NATO. And this was a highly controversial move. The alliance itself, France and Germany did not think that Ukraine and the country of Georgia, that they were not ready to join NATO and they were acutely aware of the reaction that this would have in Russia. It's crucial to this idea of revenge. Just the fact that they entertained the idea of integrating with the west, with the European Union and NATO, that sparked Vladimir Putin's rage because he felt that Ukraine played an integral part in his land empire.
Can you, I mean, there's so much here, but can you pull together the different threads that, as you say, were a confluence of things that happened that actually led to the invasion itself?
I focus quite a lot of attention on 2014, which is when Russia began its invasion. It wasn't a full scale invasion, but that's when it seized Crimea and fomented a pro Russian insurgency in Ukraine. Nowadays, whenever we hear about Kremlin officials speaking about possible peace solution in Ukraine, they often come back to the second big protest on Kyiv's Maidan Square. The Russians describe it as a Western backed or even US backed coup. Was it a coup again? You have sort of a second iteration of the Orange Revolution. You have a lot of Ukrainians going out onto the street. This time they're protesting against President Yanukovych, who had won fair and square an election in 2010. He had decided not to sign onto an association agreement with the European Union after coming under enormous pressure from Vladimir Putin. These protests, unlike the Orange Revolution in 2004, quickly became violent. Viktor Yanukovych, the president, fled Kyiv. Putin says he helped rescue Viktor Yanukovych. In fact, my argument is that it was much more of a Russian kidnapping of Viktor Yanukovych to remove him from Ukraine so that they could begin the annexation of Crimea.
Did Putin think he could invade Ukraine?
Absolutely. I think he understood that he could do what he wanted in Ukraine. Ukraine was not in NATO. It was not under this collective defense shield. And I think even more importantly, Putin was very confident that the west wouldn't intervene because of Russia's nuclear weapons.
What do you think the key takeaway is? Like, the thing you want people to know about, as you asked at the beginning, why Russia invaded Ukraine, the legacy.
Of Russian imperialism, that great empire that Vladimir Putin missed, and I think a lot of Russians missed. But that idea itself of Russia as the center of a great Eurasian empire is not enough to go and invade your neighbor. There has to be another ingredient, which is Putin's dictatorship. You know, when Putin first came into office in 2000, he was seen in the west as a reformer, as someone new, as a fresh face. He talked about Russia maybe joining NATO. He was comparing Russia's economic growth with the EU's as something to aspire to. And he became increasingly paranoid the longer he stayed in power and decided that basically everything that was happening around Russia and inside Russia was in some way directed against him. And the ultimate goal of the US and its allies was regime change in Russia and toppling his regime. For me, the real tragedy of this conflict right now is, of course, there's the narrative that says NATO started this. The Americans provoked it. But in fact, George W. Bush opened that door to NATO, but there was never any real intent to let Ukraine in. All the subsequent presidents, they were interested in something that they felt was much more important, US Russian relations, and kind of putting a floor under that to prevent any kind of nuclear escalation.
And so it was setting up an expectation that was never meant to be met. Nobody ever really thought that was going to happen, but Ukrainians did.
Well, Ukrainians began to think so, but, you know, in 2008, there was not a majority of Ukrainians even for NATO membership. It was. It was a very divisive issue within the country. People thought that by joining NATO, their own boys would end up overseas fighting other people's wars. Ukrainians only began supporting NATO after 2014, when Russia began its aggression. And people said, well, NATO is the only alliance that can defend us against Russia. You know, what's interesting is that even Zelensky was not enthusiastic about NATO membership. When he ran in 2019, he said NATO membership should be put up for a referendum inside Ukraine and let the people decide. Zelensky, when he came into office, was accused by his opponents of being a Russian tool and that he would be a pushover in any negotiations with the Kremlin. And as we know, Volodymyr Zelenskyy. He built his career as a comedian speaking Russian. His jokes are in Russian, the language that he grew up speaking. And Ukrainian was only his second language. So Zelenskyy also changed his mind once becoming president and seeing how intransigent Putin was to negotiate a peaceful settlement.
Lucien, thank you so much.
Thank you so much, Robyn.
Lucien Kim, former NPR reporter, now senior Ukraine analyst at the International Crisis Group. His new book again Putin's why Russia Invaded Ukraine.
Robin Young
This message comes from Warby Parker. Prescription eyewear that's expertly crafted and unexpectedly affordable. Glasses designed in house from premium materials starting at just $95, including prescription lenses. Stop by a Warby Parker store near you. This message comes from Bombas. Socks, underwear and T shirts are the top three requested clothing items by people experiencing homelessness. Bombus makes all three and donates one item for every item purchased. Go to bombas.com NPR and use code NPR for 20% off. This message comes from Warby Parker. Prescription eyewear that's expertly crafted and unexpectedly affordable. Glasses designed in house from premium materials starting at just $95, including prescription lenses. Stop by a Warby Parker store near.
NPR's Book of the Day: Detailed Summary of "Putin's Revenge" by Lucian Kim
Episode Title: Putin's Revenge, Lucian Kim traces the lead-up to Russia's invasion of Ukraine
Release Date: April 30, 2025
Host: Robin Young
Author/Guest: Lucian Kim, Senior Ukraine Analyst at the International Crisis Group
In this episode of NPR's Book of the Day, host Robin Young engages in a comprehensive discussion with Lucian Kim about his new book, Putin's Revenge: Why Russia Invaded Ukraine. Lucian Kim, formerly NPR's international correspondent based in Moscow, provides an in-depth analysis of the historical and political factors that culminated in Russia's aggressive actions against Ukraine.
Lucian Kim's book delves into the intricate web of events and motivations that led to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Spanning over two decades, the narrative explores the legacy of Russian imperialism, the personal ambitions of Vladimir Putin, and the geopolitical maneuvers that set the stage for conflict.
Lucian Kim (01:11):
"Why did Putin invade Ukraine? That's the simple question at the heart of a deep new book... we have a pretty robust answer."
The conversation begins with the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine, a pivotal moment that signaled Ukraine's desire to distance itself from Russian influence and align more closely with Western institutions.
Robin Young:
"Putin interfered almost laughably in the election. I mean, it's so obvious that he's doing that. What are we learning there?"
Lucian Kim (03:18):
"In the 2004 presidential elections in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin was pushing for Viktor Yanukovych to become President... Ukrainians took to the streets and reversed the outcome through a people power revolution."
This event marked a significant setback for Putin, who perceived the West's support for pro-European leaders in Ukraine as a direct challenge to his vision of a Eurasian empire.
A surprising element highlighted in Kim's analysis is the substantial role former US President George W. Bush played in shaping the dynamics that led to the conflict. Despite Bush's seemingly amicable relationship with Putin, his administration's foreign policies inadvertently fueled Russian resentment.
Robin Young (04:12):
"George W. Bush had a very good personal relationship with Vladimir Putin. Russia was the country that he visited most in his presidency."
Lucian Kim (05:27):
"Putin felt shunned... he felt that he had reached out to help the United States and that help had been rejected... Ukraine participated in the so-called 'coalition of the willing' in Iraq... George W. Bush sought to reward Ukraine by offering a roadmap into NATO."
Kim argues that Bush's encouragement for Ukraine to consider NATO membership ignited fears in Putin about NATO's encroachment into what he considers Russia's traditional sphere of influence. This laid the groundwork for perceived betrayal and fueled Putin's desire for retribution.
The discussion moves to the events of 2014, another critical juncture when Russia annexed Crimea and supported pro-Russian insurgents in eastern Ukraine. This period intensified the geopolitical tug-of-war between Russia and the West.
Lucian Kim (07:06):
"2014... when Russia began its invasion. It wasn't a full-scale invasion, but that's when it seized Crimea and fomented a pro-Russian insurgency in Ukraine."
Kim challenges the Kremlin's narrative of Western-backed coups, asserting that Russia orchestrated the removal of President Yanukovych to facilitate its territorial ambitions.
Lucian Kim (08:24):
"Putin was very confident that the West wouldn't intervene because of Russia's nuclear weapons."
A central theme in Kim's analysis is Putin's yearning to resurrect the Soviet Union's legacy and establish Russia as the epicenter of a vast Eurasian empire. Coupled with his authoritarian leadership style, these ambitions drive his aggressive policies.
Lucian Kim (08:53):
"Of Russian imperialism... but that idea itself of Russia as the center of a great Eurasian empire is not enough to go and invade your neighbor. There has to be another ingredient, which is Putin's dictatorship."
Kim emphasizes that Putin's increasing paranoia and belief in a Western plot to undermine his regime ultimately led to the invasion of Ukraine as a means of asserting dominance and retaliating against perceived slights.
Initially, Ukraine exhibited mixed feelings about NATO membership. However, Russia's aggression post-2014 galvanized Ukrainian public opinion towards seeking protection and alignment with Western institutions.
Lucian Kim (10:18):
"NATO started this. The Americans provoked it. But in fact, George W. Bush opened that door to NATO, but there was never any real intent to let Ukraine in."
Lucian Kim (10:25):
"Ukrainians only began supporting NATO after 2014, when Russia began its aggression. And people said, well, NATO is the only alliance that can defend us against Russia."
This shift highlights the complex interplay between Ukrainian agency and external influences, showcasing how geopolitical strategies can alter national sentiments and policy directions.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s political journey from a comedian fluent in Russian to a determined leader advocating for Ukraine's sovereignty underscores the dramatic changes Ukraine has undergone in response to Russian hostility.
Lucian Kim (10:25):
"Zelenskyy... was accused by his opponents of being a Russian tool... But he built his career as a comedian speaking Russian. His jokes are in Russian... He changed his mind once becoming president and seeing how intransigent Putin was to negotiate a peaceful settlement."
Zelenskyy's transformation reflects Ukraine's resilience and the nation's pivot towards a strong stance against Russian aggression, further complicating the East-West relations that Kim argues are at the heart of the conflict.
Lucian Kim concludes that the invasion of Ukraine is deeply rooted in a combination of historical imperialist ambitions, personal dictatorial impulses of Vladimir Putin, and misaligned Western policies that inadvertently fueled Russian antagonism.
Lucian Kim (08:53):
"The legacy of Russian imperialism... And another ingredient, which is Putin's dictatorship."
Lucian Kim (10:18):
"There was never any real intent [by the US] to let Ukraine in... setting up an expectation that was never meant to be met. Ukrainians did."
Kim argues that understanding these layered motivations is crucial for comprehending the ongoing conflict and its broader implications for international relations and regional stability.
In Putin's Revenge, Lucian Kim offers a nuanced exploration of the factors leading to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, challenging simplistic narratives and highlighting the profound historical and personal dimensions of the conflict. This episode of NPR's Book of the Day serves as an essential listen for anyone seeking to grasp the complexities of one of the most significant geopolitical crises of our time.