
Loading summary
Kara Swisher
Oliver, were you late?
Oliver Darcy
I was two minutes tardy. Yeah, right, I was tardy.
Kara Swisher
Rest of us were here on time.
Oliver Darcy
Late is a. Late is a strong word.
Kara Swisher
Hi everyone from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast network. This is on with Kara Swisher. And I'm Kara Swisher. I don't know how many of you saw the picture of me in the New York Times a couple months ago scaling a climbing wall. It came out just after Scott G.E. galloway and I re upped our contract with Vox for our suite of podcasts. But it was really in my mind the way I think about media and entrepreneurship. I've been launching media ventures for over two decades. I am kind of the OG of this kind of stuff. But it started with All Things Digital Conference with Malt Mossberg that we started at Dow Jones, which then morphed into the site All Things D 2007. I wanted to do my own thing because I was the world's worst employee. And I decided to work for myself because I could only annoy myself. And one of the biggest learnings I got out of those days is if you have a great idea, go ahead and do it. I kept doing it and shifted many, many times. In 2014, Walt and I broke off and started Recode. And from there we did the Recode conference. We sold it to Vox Media. Then I started a podcast at Vox. And here we are. The early Internet days with the blogging culture was a moment in big upheavals in journalism. And we're in another one of those moments right now, sparked by the Balkanization of the media landscape and AI. My guests today are three media makers who are among those stirring things up both within legacy media and on their own. Katie Drummond is the global editorial director of Wired, where she leads content strategy for the brand across all platforms. Wired has been doing a lot of really great tech reporting lately, and I think what she's doing, working to revamp Wired by leaning into the creator culture is really interesting. Oliver Darcy is a former CNN media reporter who left the legacy outlet last year to found status, a newslet that the Wall Street Journal called a must read for the power brokers of publishing and entertainment. This month he's added a weekly podcast to the mix called Power Lines. Full disclosure. He and I talked a lot about it as he was doing it and continue to do so. I'm a real admirer of his. The same for David Jorgensen. He's sort of the J.D. vance lookalike who until recently was the face of TikTok. And the YouTube accounts for the Washington Post. He just left the Post again. I talked to him about that before he did and after with a very public video letter to Jeff Bezos to focus on his own media startup, Local News International. I couldn't be more proud of him for doing this. I'm looking forward to talking about the challenges facing legacy and independent media companies, how creator culture is changing journalism, and what risk and potentials they see in the impact of AI on our business. Let me just say I want to do this podcast because I am very bullish about where media is going and I'm tired of the gloom and doom scenarios. There's a lot of exciting entrepreneurship and innovation going on and these three people represent that. My expert question this week comes from Mehdi Hassan, former MSNBC host and now media entrepreneur who launched his own digital media company, Zateo News, last year. It was a great launch and he's a great person making really interesting stuff. This will be a fun and lively session, so stick around.
Oliver Darcy
Blockchain is reshaping every aspect of society, starting with finance. It's happening across industries, across sectors and across the world. And it's happening with Ripple. With more than a decade of blockchain experience, over 60 licenses and strong institutional trust, Ripple provides financial institutions with blockchain and crypto powered solutions across payment and digital custody applications. This means secure 24. 7 transactions moving value across the world faster. Find out more@ripple.com support for this show comes from Pure Leaf Iced Tea when you find yourself in the afternoon slump.
Kara Swisher
You need the right thing to make you bounce back.
Katie Drummond
You need Pure Leaf iced tea.
Oliver Darcy
It's real brewed tea made in a.
Kara Swisher
Variety of bold flavors with just the.
Oliver Darcy
Right amount of naturally occurring caffeine.
Kara Swisher
You're left feeling refreshing, refreshed and revitalized so you can be ready to take on what's next. The next time you need to hit the reset button, grab a Pure Leaf iced Tea. Time for a tea break. Time for a Pure Leaf.
Oliver Darcy
Support for this show comes from Robinhood. Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform?
Kara Swisher
With Robinhood, not only can you trade.
Oliver Darcy
Individual stocks and ETFs, you can also seamlessly buy and sell crypto at low cost.
David Jorgensen
Trade all in one place.
Kara Swisher
Get started now on Robinhood Trading.
Oliver Darcy
Crypto involves Significant Risk Crypto trading is.
David Jorgensen
Offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto llc.
Kara Swisher
Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in.
David Jorgensen
Virtual currency business activity by the New.
Kara Swisher
York State Department of Financial Services.
David Jorgensen
Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC in short, or civic protected investing.
Kara Swisher
Involves risk, including loss of principal.
David Jorgensen
Securities trading is offered through an account.
Kara Swisher
With Robinhood Financial LLC MemberCIPIC, a registered broker dealer. It is on Oliver, Katie, Dave, thanks for coming on on. I really appreciate you being here to talk about the positive aspects of media entrepreneurship in the new age.
David Jorgensen
Thanks for having us.
Katie Drummond
Yeah, thank you.
Oliver Darcy
Stoked to be here, Kara.
Kara Swisher
We're talking about how the media landscape is evolving and you're all part of that evolution in different ways. I've encouraged some of you. There's a lot of people I've encouraged to get out of old media. At the same time, I think there's still a lot of kick in what called old media. I don't tend to use those terms, but in media in general. So my first question, are the reports of legacy media's death exaggerated or on its last legs? Katie, as the rep for legacy media, I guess that's we'll do. You go first and then Oliver and then Dave.
Katie Drummond
I really think about it less as death and more as consolidation. And I think that if you said to me, you know, legacy media is consolidating, there will be fewer publications for the journalists of the future to go work at, I would agree with that fundamentally and 100%. I mean, I think that that is undeniable, right, that these legacy institutions are consolidating, that the New York Times will continue to eat up, you know, more and more of sort of the, the newsroom workforce that's available to them and that, you know, titles or companies that cannot find a viable path into the future in terms of audience and revenue will disappear. I mean, I think that I would completely agree with that, Oliver.
Oliver Darcy
I don't know if any of these companies will die. I think that just sounds like a lot. And I think that there's a lot of brand equity still in these companies. I do think that they are starting to slip into irrelevance. And I think in the future they're going to be a lot smaller, they're going to be a lot leaner, and they're not going to have the same footprint that did, you know, during the glory days. And you think about like the Anna Wintour and Grading Carter back in the day in the golden age of magazines where you think about cable news, MSNBC and CNN and even Fox News in particular are all going to see their audiences continue to shrink and they're going to have to really get on these new platforms if they want to have that same footprint. But I Don't think they will. I think that the economics are changing and I think that the new people, the people that are starting companies are actually at an advantage because they're not starting from like the bloat of 15, 20 years ago, when these economic models could support these huge workforces. They're starting off very lean, like, you know, Atlas at Status. I started off with just me. I hired my old editor and we're growing slowly but very intentionally and everyone wears multiple hats. And that's just not the same structure as these legacy news organizations. So they're going to be smaller, they're not going to go away. Like Time magazine is still there, even though Time magazine is not the Time magazine that everyone remembers 20 years ago.
Kara Swisher
Sure. But that's been slowly dying for a long time. It just would, I wish it would lie down in some ways. Although their publisher is lovely. Dave.
David Jorgensen
Yeah, I agree a lot with what both, both of you said. One thing I've realized lately, but I've been kind of slowly realizing over time when I get to visit journalism classes a lot, a lot of those journalist professors understand that, you know, social, video, all these kinds of new, exciting, innovative things are important, but they don't know how to teach it yet. And so we're not even at the point yet necessarily where there's a lot of professors and there are some, but there's not as many teaching this in journalism schools. So once we get to that point and then the jobs start to look different and then we're caught up. I think a lot of this legacy media can survive, but it's kind of in this weird space of it doesn't they know they should have these jobs, but they don't even know how to fill them and they don't even know exactly how they work because no one was really educated on them.
Kara Swisher
All right, so we're going to talk about each of your journeys. Katie, you've had a very more traditional care, much like I did initially. You've recently announced revamping Wired, which has been doing some great reporting. Like I always point to it. I'm like, all you gotta do is do great reporting and look what happens. And you cited the two main reasons for the current media crisis. The so called traffic apocalypse, which Google 0, I think some people call it, and the AI sloppification of the Internet. Explain what you mean by that and define it for people and what you're doing to combat traffic apocalypse.
Katie Drummond
Yeah, and you know, a bit of a defensive disclaimer here. Wired's traffic is totally fine. Which I did not make clear in that, in that editor's note. We have not been as susceptible to this traffic apocalypse as other publishers because we do original reporting, right? Which is something that I believe in just fundamentally in my heart. I wouldn't be doing this if I was just, you know, optimizing all of my content for SEO. But the traffic apocalypse and sort of what we're talking about is Google essentially replacing links, right? Like the traditional blue links that you would see when you search for something, you would click on a link from a publisher, right? Now if you search for that same thing on Google, you will be met with an AI overview and sort of an aggregation that pulls from a lot of different publishers and a lot of different sources online. That means that you don't need to click through at all. So what that ultimately means for publishers, right, is some publishers are losing just massive amounts of traffic, massive amounts of audience. And I think that sort of, just generally speaking, what we have seen over the last decade plus is relying on Facebook for traffic. Facebook turns off that spigot, then you pivot over to relying on Google for traffic and you're sort of optimizing everything for SEO. Google makes a single algorithm change. And all of a sudden you are rushing around trying to desperately play catch up because your traffic just bottomed out, right? So it's sort of, we are reaching, I think like the end of that game. At the same time as that game is ending, we are seeing more and more sort of AI generated content dilute and pollute these online platforms where audiences get their news and information. So I wouldn't necessarily describe every AI overview as AI slop, but we are seeing just sort of like junkie generated garbagey stuff all over your Facebook feed when you swipe through TikTok, right? When you are on Instagram, like whatever platform you're on, AI generated content is starting to sort of like eat the Internet alive. And for us, obviously, one of the big solutions to that is just doing original journalism. I think the other piece of it though, is making it very clear to our audience that this is human led, human generated journalism. And these are the faces of the people doing it. These are their voices and you can connect directly with them, right, in a way to sort of emphasize the importance of people in the process and practice of news gathering information and entertainment.
Kara Swisher
And this has caused a growth in global revenue and readership. Is that still continuing or does it hit a wall?
Katie Drummond
Well, I mean, I certainly plan on it continuing. I think that we will just have to wait and see. I mean, we have seen incredible triple digit subscriber growth in the last six months. Not in revenue, but in actual subscribers. Right. That translates to millions of dollars to our bottom line. And so this new effort to raise the subscription price to add more benefits for our subscribers, obviously we are trying to build on the very strong momentum that we already have.
Kara Swisher
Right. We're going to get to AI more in a sec. But newsletters on Substack and other places like Beehive, Ghost everywhere else are going to be one of the main vehicles for journalists going independent. Podcasts are obviously another. Oliver, you launched your newsletter status about a year ago with a subscription model. In February, the Wall street journal reported 70,000 subscribers are on track to top a million dollars in annual revenue. So where are you now if you'd like to disclose? And are $150 year subscriptions enough to grow both revenue and audience like a larger news organization? When you have a relatively niche topic like media, what does the traffic apocalypse impact you? How does that impact you?
Oliver Darcy
Well, we're over, I'm happy to say we're over 90,000 subscribers. So we're closing in on that 100,000 number, which we're very excited about. Hopefully we can hit that soon. And we're 11 months old, so I don't know if we'll hit it at the year mark, but we're very close in terms of traffic. Like, I mean, I would love traffic. I found that Google just doesn't really care about us as a very small independent publisher. It's actually really maddening at times because we'll break a story and then like the Hill will aggregate it, Daily Mail will aggregate it, New York Post will aggregate it, and then you Google it and they'll get the traffic from our reporting. We flagged it to Google and Google has done nothing about it and doesn't seem to care about us. So Google, you should really prioritize independent publishers a little more and they should be able to tell that it's a highly cited article, but whatever. So the traffic, we're not really used to getting a large volume of traffic because that's not really the game we've ever been playing. I think again, this is what gives us a little advantage over bigger news organizations. So our stories aren't tailored for SEO. They're not. They're written for human beings who actually care about the thing they're reading.
Kara Swisher
And now are Those subscribers, the 90,000? Some are.
Oliver Darcy
No, no, no, no. If there were paid subscribers, Kara, we would Be.
Kara Swisher
Yeah, I know. That's why I was.
Katie Drummond
I don't even know.
Oliver Darcy
One day, we hope to get there. Now we have several thousand paid subscribers. 90,000 total.
Kara Swisher
You don't need that many. You don't need that many.
Oliver Darcy
You don't. You really don't need that many. I mean, you. You need a core audience that's going to pay you. I mean, we hope to one day get to 90,000 paid subscribers. I'm certain that they exist out there, people who would pay for our content. It's actually a matter of finding them. Google could help. Facebook could help. They've decided not to help news publishers, so we'll have to find another way in terms of. Is it enough? Yeah, I mean, several thousand paid subscribers at $150 a year adds up to quite a bit of revenue. And we haven't taken any outside investment money. But I think that I'm confident we can continue growing based on subscription revenue. And I'm also hoping to increase our ad sales revenue because that's another revenue engine that we. That's not quite firing at the same rate that I'd like it to fire. So if we can get that online, and that's the way I think about it, then we can hire more writers, which means we can have more ad inventory, more reason for people to subscribe, which hopefully will allow us to continue growing. But, I mean, it's. It's. I don't want to make it sound easy either, because it's very tough. And you are. Every single day you're swimming hard, and some days it feels like you're maybe not going anywhere. Other days it feels like you make more progress. As a small independent publisher, you're battling a lot of forces, whether it's big tech or just battling Katie over at Wired, who has a lot more resources than us to report on people like Elon Musk. I mean, there's a lot of competition, and it's not an easy thing.
Kara Swisher
That would be normal. So peak TV may be over, but video is on the rise. Obviously, we're doing this on video. We've been doing it for a while, both short and long form. By the way, Dave, you were known as the TikTok guy at the Washington Post. That's how I knew you. The YouTube feed you started there, Washington Post Universe, just topped a billion views. You recently left the Post to focus on your own media venture, Local News International, which you started before you left the Post. You now have just over 100,000 subscribers on YouTube, which is obviously more dependent on algorithms than search. Talk a little bit about. And then on full disclosure, you and I talked quite a bit during this. I talk to everyone at the Post. I do their exit interviews. I discuss whether they should stay or go. I discuss their current offers.
Katie Drummond
You must be very busy. You must be very busy.
David Jorgensen
It was my only exodus.
Kara Swisher
I know one of when Ben Mullen was doing a very nice piece on me. He said, I've heard you get fees for these consulting. I was like, no, I should charge these figures.
Katie Drummond
I should.
Kara Swisher
But I do talk to pretty much everyone who leaves the Washington Post at this point, so. But talk about your decision. Not that you're not special, Dave, but including your letter to Jeff Bezos, which was very funny.
David Jorgensen
Thank you.
Kara Swisher
Talk a little bit about what made you do that, because one is, I was shocked that they let you have those subscribers. I think I expressed that to you and I said, run, run as fast as you can, but go ahead, talk about it.
David Jorgensen
Yeah, I ran all the way to Kansas City. I've been based here a year. But actually, I think that distance, that physical distance did help me in the end. They couldn't find me anywhere. But jokes aside, for a long time, and even a couple years ago, I said to my editor, Lauren Sachs, I just feel like there's a ceiling here and I'm heating up against it like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. I get the bubble and I'm just hitting it.
Kara Swisher
What was the ceiling?
David Jorgensen
The ceiling was just that I kind of accomplished everything I out to do. I was hired all the way back in 2017 to reach younger audiences. And I felt like, you know, starting in 2019, I started to accomplish that by pitching TikTok. And obviously it went quite well. But I just felt like, okay, I'm just growing this audience just to grow this audience when I have other ambitions, like, I want to do my own version of the Daily show one day. I want to be that person. And it just. Within the Post, they really tried to structure it, you know, starting late last year, of how maybe we could do this. But then I just felt like things were not consistent there on a number of levels. To the Post credit, they really tried to engage with me on this, and it just. But as they were doing that on the side, they were, you know, they were kind of firing people that I really wanted to work with, that they were reorganizing people. Like, well, I can't work within this, this. This organization when I don't even know who's going to be here on Monday. That was another driving Force. And then, you know, I mentioned Lauren, she, she mentioned one day, hey, like, if you're going out on your own, I'll go with you. And so did Micah, the head of video. And so that also gave me the further.
Kara Swisher
You took the whole team, you basically.
David Jorgensen
Yeah. I mean, there's a lot of great people that work there and still work there. But, I mean, Lauren was basically my voice of reason whenever I wanted to make a really ridiculous TikTok and kind of bring it back a little bit. But also she knows my voice and Maika was the person who greenlit it in the first place back in 2019, when. It's hard to remember now, but no one in the news knew what I was talking about. Like, they really didn't. They. I, you know, the first pitch I said it was like, oh, you know, musically, it's now TikTok. I don't know what musically is. So I had to really just start to make it and show them once videos went viral. Hey, this could be something that works within our news.
Kara Swisher
Yeah. One of the explanations when someone asked me why I left all these places earlier was I don't like mama telling me what to do ever. So that's really it. But Katie, talk about, like, when you run a legacy organization like that, when you have to inspire people. One of the things I did notice you did, because I had run newsrooms, so I understood what exactly what you were doing is you got excitement around reporting and DOGE in particular. And you, you rode that fucking story till like to the end, essentially. And it was an end. But talk about that, like making people excited to stay at a place like that. How do you create an organization where entrepreneur. Increasingly people are becoming entrepreneurial and they leave and they, they're the ones that have the most energy.
Katie Drummond
Yeah. I mean, obviously I want them to be excited about the reporting. And I think at this point, if you work at Wired and you're not excited about the reporting, I would be very surprised because those people left time ago. So I think that just my own energy and enthusiasm for what we do and like wanting to like, win. Like, I, I wake up every day just desperate to win. Yeah, I can feel it.
Kara Swisher
We can all feel it, Katie.
Katie Drummond
And they, and they can feel it. And so there's that piece of it. But I think the other piece of it for us is that I want them to be stars. Like, this is my talent. And I mean that not. Not just as like reportorial talent. Obviously they're incredible reporters, editors, producers who work here. I Want them to be known, I want them to be known as vertical video stars, as podcast hosts, as YouTube hosts, as newsletter writers. I mean, one of the first things we did when I started is we took Wired's YouTube channel, which had been built on like celebrity content, autocomplete. Just stuff that had like nothing to do with the brand. And that involved literally zero people from the newsroom. And we said, okay, we're going to pilot some shows where Wired journalists actually host them. Because, like, wouldn't it be amazing and very rational to have our journalists on this platform that we operate as the brand Wired? So I want them to become stars. And in my view, if they become stars and ultimately that star spins itself into some sort of entrepreneurial situation where they go and launch their own thing. That's amazing to me. That's amazing for them, it's amazing for Wired. And then I go get to hire another young up and coming star and hopefully like build them up to a place where they want to go be an entrepreneur. I, I see that as almost like a role for legacy media to play in this. Instead of trying to fight it, it's like that's what audiences want, right? Lean into that, give people an opportunity to build that here and then if they go build it themselves somewhere else afterwards, like the, the 404 team at Vice, I mean, they worked for me, they reported to me and they, and I, I let them do their thing. They didn't need much interference. But the idea that they would have built what they built at Vice and then go and spin it off into this amazing publication that they run themselves, that's such a victory. Like, that's amazing.
Kara Swisher
We'll be back in a minute.
Oliver Darcy
Blockchain is reshaping every aspect of society, starting with finance. It's happening across industries, across sectors and across the world. And it's happening with Ripple. With more than a decade of blockchain experience, over 60 licenses and strong institutional trust, Ripple provides financial institutions with blockchain and crypto powered solutions across payment and digital custody applications. This means secure 24. 7 transactions moving value across the world faster. Find out more@ripple.com.
Kara Swisher
Support for the show comes from Framer. Having your own website used to feel like a high tech luxury, but of course these days it's standard fare. And it's not because everyone suddenly knows how to code. It's because there are incredible tools out there that can help. Tools like Framer. Framer is the design first no code website builder that lets anyone ship a production ready site in minutes. It's free to start, so you can browse hundreds of templates or start with a totally blank canvas. For maximum autonomy, Framer lets you add animations like text effects, appear effects, parallax, scrolling scroll animations, looping animations, and so much more, all of which can be added in seconds. You can also a b test your designs and set up funnels to see exactly where people click. No coding and no compromise. Ready to build a site that looks hand coded without hiring a developer? Launch your site for free@framer.com and use the code CARA to get your first month of pro on the house. That's framer.com promo code Kara K A R A framer.com promo code Kara rules and restrictions may apply.
David Jorgensen
Avoiding your unfinished.
Oliver Darcy
Home projects because you're not sure where to start.
David Jorgensen
Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to.
Oliver Darcy
Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is.
David Jorgensen
With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one.
Oliver Darcy
You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews, all on.
David Jorgensen
The app download Today.
Kara Swisher
Oliver, you launched a video podcast, Powerlines, and you've said that entrepreneurs can't rely on one medium alone to build a business. I agree. Talk about sort of the ability to make things quickly and your strategy for expanding. Because if you had done this, I'm sorry, at CNN, you'd have had 53 meetings. You know this, right? Or, or, or get buy in or get cost or whatever. Talk a little bit about.
Oliver Darcy
We would have had 53 meetings and then nothing would have happened.
Kara Swisher
Exactly.
Oliver Darcy
I would have had the 53 meetings. I probably did have 53 meetings on what I wanted to do, maybe more. And so one of the great benefits of leaving is look like we are able to launch a podcast and get things going, which we've done. And people should check out power lines. We're able to do events. We've done two events already. We did one in New York, we did1in dc for white house correspondence dinner. We'll do more and we can just do that on the fly. Like the White House correspondence dinner party we threw, which I think I think was pretty successful. We only planned that, I think a couple weeks in advance. That's when it came together and I said, let's do it.
Kara Swisher
Is there a strategy for deciding to expand? Are you worried about sacrificing depth for breadth because it's only you. Sure.
Oliver Darcy
Well, I Do have John, who I hired from CNN as well. He was the CNN media editor and brought him along here. And so. And he's been enormously helpful. And he writes a column on Saturday. So it is moving slowly beyond me. But I do want to expand, and I think that there are verticals that we can expand into that are adjacent to media and power. And I also want to expand our media coverage and maybe hire some more people to get more scoops on what's going on in some of these big, these big companies. Maybe hiring someone who can cover Hollywood specifically, maybe tech media is another vertical. Maybe Wall Street's another vertical. Down the line. There are a lot of intersections between media and power that I think we can cover. And I mean, it has to work in terms of revenue, though. That's the thing. So, you know, I would be thinking, can this person bring in at least probably double the subscription revenue that their salary is going to cost? Because it's not only salary, but you have to pay for a lot of infrastructure around them and like, what is it going to look like in terms of our bottom line? So I will think about those things as we move forward. Right now, though, is key is getting advertising on our current inventory. Because if we can do that, I think we can lock a lot more revenue, more choices.
Kara Swisher
I'm gonna. Katie, I'm gonna ask you about that, linking people's revenue and salary. But first, Dave, in the past year and a half, your Washington Post universe, YouTube had 75x more engagement per video than the Washington Post flagship account and 6.6x more overall views. It's just you. How do you translate that to the. And especially in dollars and cents for the Post, what did you do for the bottom line? Because it's a question everyone's asking, will Sochi Media keep us relevant? Is it just marketing? But you clearly tapped into something because no one wanted to watch their stuff and everyone wanted to watch yours.
David Jorgensen
Yeah, I mean, I gotta give credit to Carmela Boykin and Joey Ferguson, who are also co hosts of the account. But yeah, there was intention behind what we were doing, the YouTube and we talked about, there's internal discussions about the main YouTube channel needs some help and someone to be chaperoning it. There was no coherence happening there, whereas our channel was very intentional. There was a lot of branding. Every day there was a discussion over not just like what the overall brand looks like, but how do we approach every video and make it feel like they're all part of the same quote, unquote universe and it doesn't mean that videos had to be the exact same. That just mean tonally, you know, let's really dial into that. And that's something that I care about and get really excited about. And you know, it's like Oliver's point. A lot of times there's these meetings and they don't go anywhere. But I'm the type of person where, you know, When I pitched TikTok three months later, they said, okay, I guess let's try it, but under the radar. And I was like, I'm just going to do it. And I'm just, I'll ask for forgiveness later kind of situation. And there was a lot of that happen up until the very end of, like, people want merch, let's open a merch store. And you know, I think that luckily again, the post was like, all right, I guess they're doing this. And so they, they appreciated when they saw the results, I think.
Kara Swisher
Right.
David Jorgensen
And I always felt confident that we were going to have results. But I don't know what the bottom, how much it helped the bottom line. I mean, certainly there's like the AdSense revenue, even with shorts, there's something there. But what I always said and would continue to say for the post, but especially going forward with Local News International, is we're building trust long term. It's not a short term thing. Like they might be short videos and of course I'm going to get into long form videos as well. But this is like a relationship that's been built over time. And part of what really helped with that is that it was built for a big part of it during the pandemic. And I was really committed to posting when I felt good about it almost every single day. And I found from a lot of people that that helped kind of create, you know, a parasocial relationship, but in the most positive way. And I think also that built trust. When I started to dive deeper into topics that, you know, actually newsy topics, when before it was just like, oh my God, is Dave going to go crazy in his apartment? It became like, oh, that guy I watched every day is telling me about what's happening in the war in Ukraine.
Kara Swisher
Right.
David Jorgensen
I'm going to listen to him.
Kara Swisher
Right.
David Jorgensen
And obviously there's a big responsibility there. But anyway, to get back to the question, it was kind of unclear how much money it was making, but I was just like, I'm going to keep making stuff that works and see what happens. You guys try to figure to how out what to do with it. Yeah, yeah.
Kara Swisher
So, Katie, talk about that idea of, like, taking advantage. Like when you have those entrepreneurs, which you and I, I think, both celebrate of these media companies paying attention to that and attributing people's salaries to revenue. I have done that for years. I was, when we were at Wall Street Journal, I'm like, we made you 5 million and I'm taking half. So there you go.
Katie Drummond
Or more.
Kara Swisher
Right. You know what I mean? Like, if you can attribute. Is that something you think about a lot?
Katie Drummond
I do. I do think about it. I mean, look, nobody at Wired. I love them all. They're not making me 5 million dol. If someone did, I would be happy to work out what that rev share looks like. I do think that sort of the. The incentive model in journalism has to account for that entrepreneurial ship. Right? Like that desire to take a big leap, to try something. If that thing is successful, that person has earned a stake in that. Right. Like they have earned a seat at the table. And I think it's important to recognize that, especially if you want to retain them.
Kara Swisher
It has to tell you it's been a very difficult road to get. Get people to acknowledge it. One of the biggest risk factors, and I'd like you each to talk about for news at the moment, is the threat of litigation, including from the administration. CBS and ABC Coughed up 16 million and $15 million, respectively. Settled lawsuits with President Trump. Meta paid 25 million to settle. Now Trump is suing the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch to the tune of $10 billion. That's with a B. After it reported on a birthday card he allegedly wrote for Jeffrey Epstein. These companies with huge legal teams and insurance talk about the implications for smaller media entrepreneurs. Let's start with you, Oliver, and then you, Dave and Katie, from a perspective, you're part of a bigger organization. But one of the reasons I never did the substack is like, I'm not going out on the Savannah with those. With Peter Thiel out there. He's a hyena. And I'm like, the water's fine. Not for Kara Swisher, it's not. Let me just say I think about it like that's one of the reasons I never did one. Even though I probably would have made quite few a a tidy sum at any of these places. Oliver, talk about that. How do you think about that? Because a lot of whether I know Substack has legal stuff, but it's not very good. Like, it's just not protective in the way that a Vox media is or conde Nast or whoever it happens to be.
Oliver Darcy
No, I think about this quite a bit. Beehive, they give up to a million dollars in defamation insurance. They'll pay for that. So that's helpful. But, you know, a million dollars can go like that when Elon Musk's lawyers come calling. So, you know, we pay a lot of money for extra defamation insurance. Tens of thousands of dollars. I'll just leave it at that to make sure that we're covered. If, you know, we're reporting on people with big egos and thin skin and knock on wood right now, nothing's happened. But I've reported on these people for a while and I've been sued many times when I was at cnn. And I know how this works. And so. So it is something we think about. We pay a lot of money for it. And that's one of these different things, these hidden costs that people don't see. Even just getting defamation insurance right now is extremely challenging for a small independent publisher because there's a chill in the air. These insurance companies know that there are people like Elon Musk or Bill Ackman or Donald Trump out there and they don't really necessarily want to often take the risk on ensuring a band of two in status case at the moment.
David Jorgensen
Right.
Oliver Darcy
They don't know like, I'm going to go on a podcast and they're going to insure it and who knows what those two are going to say? Why would we take their money? When you think of independent journalism and the actions that these billionaires are taking these days, this is one of the things I worry about, that just them filing these lawsuits is problematic. And you saw what happened with Media Matters and Elon Musk. According to the New York Times, they had a story this weekend they're even considering shutting down. And that's a huge organization backed by a lot of wealthy donors with a lot of defamation insurance. So it can get very costly very quickly, even if the person filing the lawsuit actually has no case, Right?
Kara Swisher
That's correct. That's usually they don't. Dave, do you think about. Do you think about that? You're sort of doing humor, right?
David Jorgensen
Right. It's funny because I. Funny, literally. But I sometimes I wonder how much can the humor part kind of soften the blow? I don't know if it does. I mean, with South Park, I think the opposite happened. But I think a lot of the times what I have found with our content is that it appeals to conservatives in a very weird way that I didn't anticipate however, we're also in the same boat as Oliver in many ways, where we're working on extra insurance, but also we're part of Beehive, not Substack, and we're both part of the media collective which includes that what he was talking about where some coverage there. So it's not, you know, it's not like we're not going to be totally safe in any scenario. But I do feel like, you know, it's as safe as you can feel. And I guess I'm feeling a little bit like I've always felt, which is I would just, I just want to keep doing what I'm doing and I'm not going to be afraid of it. I have people around me like Lauren and Micah from the Post who are good at kind of hitting the brakes when we need to on things. So that's why they're there, so that.
Kara Swisher
I can kind of do what you want to do.
David Jorgensen
Feeling the freedom to try things. They may. Oh, let's dial this back like just a touch.
Oliver Darcy
I should also note Cara too, we have attorneys which we can consult on sensitive stories to make sure we're buttoned up legally as well. So hopefully we can avoid it.
Kara Swisher
Still doesn't prevent them from doing a nuisance.
Oliver Darcy
It doesn't prevent, but it helps. It helps a little bit.
Kara Swisher
Katie? What, how do you think of it as a, you know, you guys went full bore at Elon, really, and the whole Doge team.
Katie Drummond
I mean, I think that we go full bore a lot and we are threatened with lawsuits a lot. We have great lawyers. And I feel very, very lucky to be able to say that I, this, this may be naive or self righteous or whatever, whatever you want to call it, that if it's true and it's newsworthy, we have an obligation to publish it. We will publish it come what may. And that's how we thought about that, that Musk reporting. And that's how I think about all of our journalism. You know, I worked at Gawker Media when Peter Thiel sued us out of existence and I worked through that bankruptcy.
Kara Swisher
Via Hulk Hogan.
Katie Drummond
Via Hulk Hogan.
Kara Swisher
Do not. Rest in peace.
Katie Drummond
Do not. I'm ambivalent about his prospects in the afterlife. Like I've seen the, the very, very worst of what this can do. It was horrible. But I think if anything it has just made me dig my heels in even more. Of course, journalists like, we need to be incredibly buttoned up. We approach those stories as we approach any story, incredibly carefully. Like I am a maniac. About that. If I say something's going to legal, it's fucking going to legal. I don't care if it delays the publication of the story like it is going to the lawyers.
Kara Swisher
Yes. Yeah. I, I'm always like, you better be right.
Katie Drummond
Like you better be right.
Kara Swisher
I'll kill you if you're not right. Yeah.
Katie Drummond
And yes, like being right doesn't always protect you from correct, ridiculous, terrifying existential lawsuits. But, but you have to publish the stories anyway.
Kara Swisher
So I want to go a bit deeper on this new focus on personality authenticity. A Reuters Institute survey on journalism trends earlier this year called it the creatorfication of journalism which I don't like any more than reporterpreneurs. What does that mean to each of you very briefly. And where do you see the possible benefits and risks of leaning into that creator economy? I, I myself am that I think I have become that. I love it. Talk each of you, why don't you start Oliver and then Dave and then Katie.
Oliver Darcy
I, I think all journalists are creators. I mean we're all creating content and I think everyone should embrace that term. I think for a long time legacy news organizations and big time anchors might have of look down on that term. I'm a journalist, I'm not a creator. Those are the tiktokers and we're above that. I don't think that's the case at all in terms of authenticity. I think that is a major selling point for us as status is that people know that they're getting me, they're getting John and we're calling things out and we're not beating around the bush, we're not watering down the reporting and we're going to say the things that people are certainly thinking but, but really too few are saying out loud. And that's for a variety of reasons but it's very difficult sometimes at a major news organization to have color in your reporting and have some flair and have a little snark when I when it. And, and that's what makes it kind of fun too. I think the readers like it because it's a little bit fun. People love Kara Swisher because Kara Swisher is not. No one tells her what to say. You say what's on your mind and you hold people's feet to the fire. And that's why I what we're trying.
Kara Swisher
To do all things d the personality aspect of it and people were very push up against it. Dave, what about you?
David Jorgensen
You know, I think on the authentic part too, you know, we talked about like Katie, you Were talking about how, like, how do we approach things and how do we think about it. We're just going for the truth. Right. As sort of Pollyanna cheesy as that may sound, I think part of my authenticity has always been my moral compass. And like, early last year, I was doing a lot of TikToks where I was kind of poking fun at Biden, and a lot of people were very precious about it. And I was like, why are you being precious about it? And of course, like, five or six months later, everyone was in agreement that, wait a second, this is kind of strange. And so I think that that. That takes me anywhere, whether it's what you perceive as left or right. And the authenticity part, and that is always, for me, comes out as humor. So I think that's really easy to kind of capture people there. As far as the title of. Of, you know, I'm pretty ambivalent to the word creator. I think it's totally fine and we should embrace it as much as you want. But, like, for me personally, I'm the video editor first. That's what I enjoy the most in a video is the hour or two where I'm really editing something and making it punching it up and making it funnier.
Kara Swisher
What about you, Katie? How do you think about that idea of creatorification?
Katie Drummond
I mean, I am thrilled for journalists to embrace the tools and the platforms and the tactics of creators. I think that that makes perfect sense. I think it's all about connecting the journalist to the audience and creating that direct connection, that conversation. What I worry about, I think, is the creator adopting the Persona of the journalist. And that, to me, is a different thing.
Kara Swisher
Yeah.
Katie Drummond
That does not involve Dave or Oliver or any of us on this call. And that. And that is where I start to worry about audiences not understanding the difference between someone who plays a journalist on TV, this schmuck. Someone. Someone playing a journalist on TikTok, as opposed to like, like, oh, the actual journalist on TikTok. Like, that is where I start to worry about the dilution sort of between those two professions, I guess I would say.
Kara Swisher
Yeah, I just had a back and forth with some Maha creators, and I got all their information from Google and I'm like, if I could reach to the video and hit you, I would. That would.
Katie Drummond
There you go.
Kara Swisher
Yeah, exactly. So when you think about that from the modeling point of view, for example, Dave, YouTube creator Samir Chowdhury told you that he thought that creators could take ad money. Subscriptions are a better model for journalists because they're Only beholden to their audience. I am not of that school. You said you're a video editor. You wrote in your introductory email you'd be working with brands and partners as well. I was always in that camp. At the time we did it, it was very controversial. We did both subscriptions and advertising. What'll be different here? Obviously you're not going to do like, you know, your videos. Oh, isn't, isn't Meta a great product like that kind of thing? But how do you, how do you plan to make money at that, that.
David Jorgensen
Yeah, I think with anything and I'm sure the way you've approached it, it's always a case by case basis. So there are certain brands where I'm like, I'd be totally comfortable talking about that on camera as a brand that's either apolitical or support something that I'm totally behind. And then partnerships. We're talking with all kinds of people about what a long form series could look like with anyone. And that also plays into does it look good if we're working with these people? What does it look like? Again, you just look at all the factors and decide if it's worth it.
Kara Swisher
So right now subscriptions are more important or advertising. And same thing for Oliver and Katie right now. What do you think is most important each of you? Very quickly?
David Jorgensen
Dave, I'd say subscriptions just in the sense of audience building. I just care about the audience most.
Katie Drummond
Katie, same answer. Subscriptions to me are our direct connection to our audience and they are our escape velocity from a very turbulent advertising industry. Right. It will always be that way. A very turbulent commerce business. Right. It will inevitably be that way. Sure. Subscriptions can rise and fall, but, but for me, if we can build that business to a place where it takes on the majority of the kind of financial burden for Wired, that is a very good place for us to be.
Oliver Darcy
So Oliver, easily subscriptions. We do everything for our subscribers and so that's, that's where, that's where our effort is and that's, that's the, those are our customers. We want to make them happy at the end of the day and we want them to value our product.
Kara Swisher
Yeah, I have to say for pivot non advertising we can't, we run out. Like it's funny we would go to subscriptions if we needed it. But it's a really interesting, we thought about it and we're like, we don't need to, you know, I will say.
Oliver Darcy
Can I, can I say one point? It would be great if we can get the advertising, though at status to allow our journalism or some of our journalism to be more accessible to people who can't afford to purchase a subscription. And so that's something that's on my mind as well, particularly in this moment where, like, there's so much toxic misinformation out there. How do we get good information to people if we can have advertisers basically pay for that and subsidize that? That would be very helpful and something that we're obviously cognizant of and trying to figure out.
Kara Swisher
We'll be back in a minute.
Oliver Darcy
What if you could make that stop?
Kara Swisher
With LPL Financial, we remove the things holding you back and provide the services to help push you forward.
Oliver Darcy
If you're a financial advisor, what if.
Kara Swisher
You could have more freedom but also more support ready to invest? What if you could have an advisor.
Katie Drummond
That really understood you when it comes.
Kara Swisher
To your finances, your business, your future? At LPL Financial, we believe the only question should be what if you could.
Katie Drummond
Paid Advertisement Anna Kendrick is not client of LPL Financial LLC and receives compensation to promote LPL.
Kara Swisher
Investing involves risk including potential officer principal.
Katie Drummond
LPL Financial LLC member FinaS IPC Ryan.
David Jorgensen
Reynolds here for Mint Mobile.
Katie Drummond
With the price of just about everything.
David Jorgensen
Going up, we thought we'd bring our prices down. So to help us, we brought in a reverse auctioneer, which is apparently a thing Mint Mobile Unlimited Premium wireless everybody get 30, 30 better get 30 better to get 2020, 20 everybody get 2020 every 1515 just 15 bucks a month sold. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment.
Katie Drummond
Of 45 for 3 month plan equivalent to 15 per month required new customer offer for first 3 months only speed slow after 35 gigabytes of networks busy taxes and fees extra. See mintmobile.com.
Kara Swisher
Amazon Gasta Menos Son Riemas Every week we get a question from an outside expert. Here's yours from a fellow media entrepreneur.
David Jorgensen
My name is Mehdi Hassan. I'm the founder, CEO and editor in chief of Zateo, a news media company that I founded on the Substack platform last year. My question is, how do we in the independent media, independent journalism space, especially online, where people are in an increasingly polarized and partisan America in their bubbles in their echo chambers, how do we avoid the problem of audience capture, of simply giving our listeners, our viewers, our subscribers, what they want to hear, not what they need to hear, because we're afraid of losing subs, losing revenue in a very competitive online space. How big a challenge do you think that is for independent media, especially subscription driven outlets like my own.
Kara Swisher
All right, Katie, why don't you start then Oliver and then Dave.
Katie Drummond
I, I mean, look, I think that, that we have a point of view and we will always have a point of view, but that point of view is underwritten always by the truth and the facts. So to me, it's like, I'm kind of tired of having this debate about how we reach everyone, how we, like, reach across the aisle with our facts.
David Jorgensen
Fair point.
Katie Drummond
I'm like, I'm going to collect facts. I'm going to collate that information into a story. I'm going to put that story everywhere I possibly can. In my magazine, on my website, on YouTube, on TikTok, on Instagram, on Reddit, in a newsletter. I'm going to, I'm going to put it everywhere you can find it. And if you choose to engage with it or not, that is up to you. But, like, that is the best I can do. So I think lead with facts, lead with the truth. Be transparent about your point of view and where you're coming from and what your worldview is. Don't try to pretend to be playing both sides. Don't try to pretend to be objective. That's not a real thing. Just be honest. Put your journalism in as many places as you possibly can. And I think that at that point, for me, I'm like, I have done everything I possibly can, and if you don't like it, don't read it.
Kara Swisher
Right, Right.
Oliver Darcy
Oliver, I, I just don't see this, I mean, for our publication as a problem. We, we try printing scoops every night. Reporting every night, and people subscribe for new information. And so you do have a tone.
Kara Swisher
You do have a tone.
Oliver Darcy
We have a tone.
Kara Swisher
But Oliver has a tone. I'm like, it's an excellent tone as far I'm concerned.
Oliver Darcy
It is a good tone.
Katie Drummond
It's a good tone.
Oliver Darcy
Thank you.
David Jorgensen
We like your tone.
Kara Swisher
Thank you. Tone.
Oliver Darcy
But you'd be surprised, Kara, because I hear from, you know, Republicans and people on that side of the aisle who read still because they know that we have information that's accurate and that they want to know. And so I think when you weave maybe a tone with some reporting, it can appeal to pretty much everyone because everyone wants that information at the end of the day.
Kara Swisher
So report once again.
Oliver Darcy
That's what we do. Reporting wins. Reporting Reporting wins. Delivering a new information win, wins. And if you just have a tone and you have no new reporting, I think that's when you're in Trouble, because people will say, well, I don't really like the tone, so I can just tune out. And that's a problem.
Kara Swisher
Dave.
David Jorgensen
Every day I make a video and I approach it entirely differently, and that's by design. And that's kind of my own, like, creative desire to just approach something differently. Like Katie said, my point of view is really not changing. I mean, if it does, it's probably like a little bit one direction at any given time, but it's not really changing, and it hasn't for years. But. But sometimes I'll look at all the thumbnails on the main TikTok or YouTube page and go, is everything starting to look too similar? And so I go, let me approach this next story, which might still be about Trump or something we've been covering, but in a totally different way. Not with a different point of view, just a different way of covering it. Whether it's like, you know, people call them new sketches or it's like straight to camera, I just think about it differently and I try to cover it that way. And I think that helps the audience to start to think about the story.
Kara Swisher
In a different way.
Katie Drummond
Fresh.
Kara Swisher
You didn't think about putting an eye on a penis, I guess. I guess someone else did that.
David Jorgensen
No, I just put it on spam.
Kara Swisher
Cans and leave it there. I want to go back to the AI splatification of the Internet. AI is clearly this looming challenge for the media industry. According to Pew study from April, Americans overly think that AI is going to have a negative impact on news and journalism. But 1 in 5Americans, roughly the same for Republicans and Democrats, said they thought AI would do a better job at writing a news story than journalists. How are you using AI in your work? Katie? You start, then Oliver, then Dave. You've said humans a lot. So each of you, briefly, how do you think of AI as a benefit and a negative?
Katie Drummond
I mean, I think it is, as of now, a net negative for the Internet and for the way people access and consume information. I will be totally honest with you. As the editor in chief of Wired, I think a lot of people wish, I would say, like, we are all in on AI. We are using it all day long. We're not using it to write our stories. We're not using it to generate images, we're not using it to generate video. We fundamentally do not believe in that and we do not do that. There might be, like, fun experiments that we'll do in the future using it where we would be very transparent. But as of now, it's not something that we feel comfortable with. It's not something we think is necessary. You know, we use it in our reporting in sort of a background way. If it's like a data investigation, if we're parsing thousands of pages of documents, we use it in functions like copy editing or other sort of like more administrative roles. But that's really the limit. I mean, we are genuinely very focused on doing what AI can't do. I think our actual new tagline for our features program is something like AI could never like, that's actually like a theme for us.
Kara Swisher
That's good.
Katie Drummond
So you're gonna, AI actually can't do what we do.
Kara Swisher
Right, Right.
Katie Drummond
And it can't, I don't, I do not believe that it can, Oliver.
Kara Swisher
And also, are you worried about getting like AI news botted, for example?
Oliver Darcy
I mean, I think, I think building on what Katie was saying, I don't really think AI can do what we're doing on a nightly basis, at least not yet. Unless sources are going to start talking to robots and divulging secrets to robots, which I have a hard time believing will happen. Maybe that's in our future at some point, but right now that's not the case. And so I think I would be worried if Status were printing. You know, if we could just be aggregated and we weren't doing any original news or any original reporting, that's what would worry me. And I think a lot of news organizations that do a lot of that stuff, they're probably very worried right now because AI can write those stories. I've used it or experimented with it as a business consultant of sorts, replacing maybe a McKinsey, you know, fed it subscriber information like, you know, this is how many we have now, like how many do you estimate we'll have in the future? And it will, it will like make you like a 30 page research document, useful, you know, with a whole bunch of projections. I, I, I mean, look, I don't, I think it's useful and it seems fairly accurate. I wouldn't bet my life on it at the moment.
Kara Swisher
I bet a McKinsey report, the same thing.
Oliver Darcy
Yeah, I mean, I think it's, well, I wouldn't pay for one of those either, but so think it's good to experiment with the technology and not be like standoffish to it. But in terms of like, is AI going to start writing Status tomorrow? I mean, it's not capable of doing that right now. So it's not something that like we're thinking of because we're just not engaged in the kind of journalism that I think it's like most likely to replace the next five years.
Kara Swisher
What about you, Dave?
David Jorgensen
Yeah, our unofficial official slogan is news for humans by humans. Except for my dog lola, who's on LinkedIn. Lola Jorgensen. She. She actively posts mostly just barking, but I feel like with AI, I similarly feel like I haven't had a use for it yet. I did do this video with Mediawise. I'm an ambassador for them and they're part of Pointer. And it was. I'm really proud of this video we did together because it was about. For reporters who are using AI. Here's how you properly disclose it. And again, not doing that myself yet, but I think at least we should be promoting how to safely attribute it if you are using it. Because right now it's pretty much the Wild west, so just do whatever you want with it.
Kara Swisher
So, two more questions. How do you predict we'll be getting our news five years from now? And what role will each of you play? Let's start with you, Oliver, then Dave, and then Katie.
Oliver Darcy
That's a really tough question, Kara. I think, I mean, I do think that newsletters will still be a thing. I'm banking on that. It's a direct way into people's inboxes. There's no, at the moment, there's no algorithm, there's no SEO game to play. People sign up for something, it gets delivered straight into their inbox. And so that's certainly a trend that I see. I don't really see reversing. I hope it doesn't reverse. And then, you know, video. I think everyone's going to be leaning hard into video because everyone's scrolling on their phones nonstop. And I don't really see that changing either. So. So I think that's why we just launched a video podcast. That's why I think that major news organizations are going to be launching on video and trying to make their reporters on air talents, if you will. And I think as these cable networks actually in linear and broadcast television declines, I think that the next version of television is going to be these shows. You're seeing it with comedians already. You're starting to see it with news creators. And I think it's going to continue.
Kara Swisher
Dave?
David Jorgensen
Yeah, I'm certainly betting on video. And I mean, I guess I have been for a while. And I think part of that is just, you know, adapting to whatever the newest form is. The, you know, even five or six years ago I asked, I would be asked about TikTok which we already on. What do you think the next version of TikTok is? I felt like people were thinking about it wrong. It's not necessarily the next app, it's what's the next version of an iPhone? Or what's the next iteration of the iPhone? And how are people like, is it going to be just a hologram? I don't know. But I mean, I think that's what you should be thinking about is when that happens, that's what we have to adapt to.
Kara Swisher
Katie?
Katie Drummond
Well, probably from chatbots to some extent, but I hope that it is. You know, people are obtaining news and information in five years in a very direct way. Get rid of the Facebooks, get rid of the Googles, get rid of the intermediaries, direct connection to journalists like Oliver and Dave on all of these different platforms in your inbox, on your TikTok, whatever it is is more direct the better. And I will either be still running Wired and hopefully will have spawned some Olivers and Daves of our own, or I will be the CEO of a company that supports journalists like them in a more effective and strategic way than the substacks and the beehives of the world.
Kara Swisher
Yep, that's a great answer. There's a lot of needs. All right, last question before we go. I'd like each of you to give a piece of advice to your fellow panelists round robin. Where should others lean in and where should they each shift gears? Katie, why don't you start and give advice to each of them?
Katie Drummond
Wait, what? Yes. You want me to give advice to each of them?
Kara Swisher
Yeah, I do. I just said that. That's what I just said.
Katie Drummond
Oh my God. Okay, Oliver, I would like you to continue to lean in to your strong point of view, your voice and your scoopiness. I subscribed to your newsletter almost immediately after it launched because you had so many annoyingly good scoops that I had no choice but pay to read them. So keep going there. And then I would like you to lean out of, of suggesting links to tech publications or sort of future facing publications that are not wired. I do find that very irritating when I read the newsletter and I'm like, it's just verge link, verge link, verge link.
Oliver Darcy
Like, come on, man, we need more wired links.
Kara Swisher
Okay, I got it.
Katie Drummond
He needs a few more. So there. Sorry, I don't know if this is.
Kara Swisher
That's good piece of information advice, Dave.
Katie Drummond
You know, there was a moment earlier in the conversation where Oliver was talking about his defamation insurance and sort of the legal scaffolding that he had built for his publication.
Oliver Darcy
Yes.
Katie Drummond
And then I heard you talk about that, and I got a little bit stressed out. So, Dave, get a lawyer. Make sure you have really good lawyers. Yes, because I told them this. I told him because even if conservatives love you, you're going to piss someone off and you're going to need really good lawyers.
Kara Swisher
So.
Katie Drummond
So just please.
Kara Swisher
Yeah, lawyers. Please write it down. Lawyers.
David Jorgensen
I appreciate it. We do have good. Yeah, don't worry. It was. I guess I got a little bit too into the. But I'm going to have fun.
Oliver Darcy
But no, we have.
Kara Swisher
Okay, good. Okay.
Oliver Darcy
Oliver, Dave has the best lawyers. Don't even mess with him.
David Jorgensen
That's the best.
Katie Drummond
Okay. Dave has great lawyers.
Kara Swisher
Yeah.
Oliver Darcy
Okay, it's my turn. Well, I guess to. Katie, let people be entrepreneurial and sidewired as much as you can. We don't know each other that well, but I don't get the vibe that you are someone who subjects your reporters who want to grow and do cool things to endless meetings. But I would just. I mean, I just think that there are so many people who end up going on their own because of frustration with the red tape inside their companies. And I feel like newsroom leaders can definitely retain a lot of talent and build businesses within their businesses if they just cut through that and made it easy for reporters to not only build things, but also just even report. I know. I remember when I was at cnn, like, you know, people with people ask me now, I guess, why do you get so many more scoops at Status than a cnn? And I would say, well, it's because, like, it's yours. I'm more incentivized now. And I feel like, just to be totally honest, at cnn, there's so much bureaucracy, it deincentivizes landing that scoop or like chasing it down because it's such a pain to clear the reporting. So that's, that's what I would. My advice to you. And it sounds like you're on it, so.
Katie Drummond
No, I mean, I will say CNN does have a bit of a scoop problem, but that's for another conversation.
Kara Swisher
All right. Okay. All right. Okay. And I'll at Dave.
Oliver Darcy
My advice to Dave, and I've already given this advice to him, but I'll give it to him here is get a bookkeeper. Get a bookkeeper soon because you don't want to get behind on books. And I am dealing with taxes now. And having a good bookkeeper makes that so much easier.
Kara Swisher
So fun that you're talking about books.
David Jorgensen
You don't have to worry.
Kara Swisher
I love you. Oh, you're.
Oliver Darcy
You're all nice. Don't think about these things, though. Don't think about these things.
Kara Swisher
You have to. Yeah.
David Jorgensen
It's weird, though. The next podcast I'm doing is bookkeepers.
Kara Swisher
And lawyers, so it's really preparing me. So what your. Your advice, Dave?
David Jorgensen
I feel. Well, I've been saying this a lot in the last week or so, but I feel like 10 toddlers in a trench coat. So giving you advice does. It feels very silly to me because I both look up. I look up to both of you. But I guess in that vein, I would say to you, Katie, like, if have any of one that works for you, listen to this podcast, I think they'll have a lot of confidence hearing you talk about it, if they haven't already heard you talk this way.
Katie Drummond
Thank you.
David Jorgensen
Yeah, if I were in their position and heard you talking about it, I would feel very emboldened.
Kara Swisher
Well, the post should have been able to keep you, Dave, but at this.
David Jorgensen
Time, I cannot confirm or deny that statement. But, yeah, Oliver, I mean, this is so silly. But the thing that keeps occurring to me, this whole podcast, and I'm just a visual learner, is I want more people to see your setup right here. And you're so meticulous in how everything. And the people at Beehive told me that as a compliment, that everything you do is so thought out. I mean, they're seeing it through your newsletter and obviously you have clips of this, you in the studio. But I just want to see more and more of the inside of your brain. I guess I'm just. I'm more and more fascinated.
Oliver Darcy
Wow.
Kara Swisher
See? Yeah. I have one piece of advice for all of you. As I always say, don't let mama tell you what to do. You'll love this new era. It drives me crazy when people are very negative about the media. There's so much exciting stuff going on, both at old legacy media companies with great leaders and in these independent things. And so I think it's really important for people to think about it, about it that way instead of giving up, because it's very easy to feel disheartened, but you don't have to be. Anyway, thank you so much. I really appreciate. You're all wonderful journalists. And one of the things is you're all creating high quality stuff for people that they really enjoy and either pay for or advertisers pay for. And that's a really great sign. Thank you so much.
Katie Drummond
Thank you.
Oliver Darcy
Thank you, Kara.
David Jorgensen
Thanks for another exit interview.
Kara Swisher
On With Kara Swisher is produced by Christian Castor, Roselle Katera Yoko, Megan Burney, Allison Rogers and Kalyn Lynch. Nishat Kirwa is Vox Media's executive producer of podcasts. Special thanks to Bradley Sylvester. Our engineers are Rick Kwan and Fernando Arruda, and our theme music is by Trackademics. If you're already following the show, you are humans for humans. If not, get a good lawyer. Go wherever you listen to podcasts, search for on with Kara Swisher and hit follow. Thanks for listening to on with Kara Swisher from Podium Media, New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network, and us. We'll be back on Monday with more.
Podcast Summary: "Journalists or Creators? How Media Entrepreneurs Are Reshaping News"
Episode Details:
Kara Swisher sets the stage by reflecting on her extensive career in media entrepreneurship, highlighting her journey from the All Things Digital Conference to founding Recode, and eventually launching her current podcast under Vox Media. She underscores the ongoing transformation in the media landscape, driven by the fragmentation of media channels and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). Swisher introduces her guests—Katie Drummond, Oliver Darcy, and David Jorgensen—as key players innovating within both legacy and independent media sectors.
Kara Swisher: "Are the reports of legacy media's death exaggerated or on its last legs?" ([05:23])
Katie Drummond counters the narrative of legacy media's imminent demise by framing it as a period of consolidation. She acknowledges that while major institutions like The New York Times are expanding their workforce, smaller publications struggling to find viable revenue and audience paths will likely disappear. Drummond emphasizes that legacy media isn't "dying" but rather evolving through mergers and acquisitions.
Oliver Darcy adds a nuanced perspective, suggesting that legacy media companies won't vanish entirely but will become smaller and leaner. He remarks, "I think they are starting to slip into irrelevance... they're not going to have the same footprint as during the glory days" ([07:02]). Darcy highlights how modern startups like Status operate more efficiently without the historical baggage of large, cumbersome organizations.
David Jorgensen echoes the sentiment, pointing out that academic institutions have yet to fully adapt to the changing journalism landscape. He notes, "Legacy media can survive, but it's kind of in this weird space of not knowing how to fill new types of jobs" ([08:32]).
Swisher transitions to discuss the entrepreneurial journeys of her guests, focusing first on Katie Drummond's efforts to revamp Wired. Drummond attributes Wired's resilience to its commitment to original journalism rather than optimizing content solely for search engine traffic. She explains the dual threats facing media: the "traffic apocalypse" from Google’s AI-generated content aggregations and the proliferation of AI-produced low-quality content diluting user experience.
Katie Drummond: "We have not been as susceptible to this traffic apocalypse as other publishers because we do original reporting" ([09:47]).
Drummond reveals that Wired has experienced "incredible triple-digit subscriber growth" over the past six months, translating into significant revenue increases. She discusses Wired's strategy to enhance subscription offerings to sustain and grow their audience.
Oliver Darcy shares the success of his newsletter, Status, which has rapidly grown to nearly 100,000 subscribers within 11 months. Darcy explains the challenges of relying on platforms like Google for traffic, where larger publications often overshadow smaller ones. He emphasizes that Status focuses on delivering authentic, human-centered journalism without tailoring content purely for SEO.
David Jorgensen discusses his transition from The Washington Post to founding Local News International, highlighting the importance of creative freedom and direct audience engagement. Jorgensen emphasizes building trust with his audience through consistent, high-quality content.
The discussion delves deeper into the "traffic apocalypse" and the impact of AI on media. Katie Drummond elaborates on how Google's AI aggregations are replacing traditional search links, causing significant traffic losses for publishers dependent on SEO. She criticizes the influx of AI-generated content that "dilutes" online platforms, asserting that original journalism remains the antidote.
Katie Drummond: "We are seeing just sort of like junkie generated garbagey stuff all over your Facebook feed" ([09:47]).
Oliver Darcy expresses frustration with how Google's algorithms prioritize larger, more established publications, effectively marginalizing independent voices. He underscores the importance of original reporting and maintaining a unique editorial voice to retain subscriber interest.
David Jorgensen highlights the balancing act between leveraging AI for efficiency and maintaining journalistic integrity. He emphasizes the role of AI in administrative tasks like copy editing but remains skeptical of its capability to replace nuanced human journalism.
Swisher introduces the concept of "creatorfication" of journalism, a trend where journalists adopt creator roles to foster authenticity and direct audience connections. Oliver Darcy advocates for journalists embracing their roles as creators, stating, "People know that they're getting me, they're getting John, and we're calling things out" ([37:27]).
David Jorgensen discusses the integration of humor and personal authenticity in his content, suggesting that a strong personal brand can transcend political divides. He remarks, "My authenticity has always been my moral compass" ([38:34]).
Katie Drummond supports the shift towards creator culture, emphasizing the importance of direct engagement with audiences across multiple platforms. However, she cautions against the potential blurring of lines between journalists and creators, worrying that audiences might confuse authentic journalism with performative content.
Katie Drummond: "I would worry about audiences not understanding the difference between someone who plays a journalist on TV... as opposed to the actual journalist on TikTok" ([40:02]).
The conversation shifts to the increasing threat of litigation against media organizations, particularly from high-profile figures like former President Donald Trump. Oliver Darcy discusses the financial and operational burdens of defending against defamation lawsuits, highlighting the limitations of insurance coverage for small publications.
Oliver Darcy: "Even just getting defamation insurance right now is extremely challenging for a small independent publisher" ([32:18]).
David Jorgensen shares his approach to mitigating legal risks through humor and careful content creation. He collaborates with legal experts to ensure compliance and protect against potential lawsuits.
David Jorgensen: "We are building trust long term... responsibly attributing AI use if you are using it" ([52:38]).
Katie Drummond emphasizes the necessity of robust legal frameworks within media organizations. She reflects on her experience with Gawker Media and the importance of unwavering commitment to truth, stating, "If it's true and it's newsworthy, we have an obligation to publish it" ([36:09]).
Panelists share their visions for the future of news delivery and consumption:
Oliver Darcy predicts that newsletters will remain a vital communication channel, providing direct access to audiences without the interference of algorithms. He also foresees a continued rise in video content, with reporters becoming on-air talents in the next generation of television ([52:52]).
David Jorgensen aligns with Darcy’s view on video, emphasizing adaptability to emerging platforms and technologies. He anticipates future iterations of current media formats, such as augmented reality or holographic presentations, necessitating continuous innovation ([53:52]).
Katie Drummond envisions a future where news is consumed directly through various platforms without intermediary gatekeepers like Facebook or Google. She advocates for a diversified presence across inboxes, social media, and emerging technologies, ensuring journalists remain accessible and connected to their audiences ([54:23]).
In a lighthearted segment, the panelists exchange advice tailored to each other's ventures:
Katie Drummond encourages Oliver Darcy to maintain his strong editorial voice and diversify Wired links in his newsletter. She advises David Jorgensen to secure competent legal support to navigate potential lawsuits ([55:23]).
Oliver Darcy advises Katie Drummond to empower her journalists to pursue entrepreneurial projects within Wired, reducing bureaucratic barriers that often stifle creativity and initiative ([57:00]).
David Jorgensen suggests continuous adaptation and transparency in content creation, emphasizing the importance of trust and consistent audience engagement ([58:25]).
Kara Swisher concludes by reinforcing her optimism about the future of media, highlighting the innovative work of her guests and the importance of resisting negative narratives about the industry's trajectory. She emphasizes the potential for high-quality, subscription-based media models to thrive amidst evolving challenges.
Kara Swisher: "Don't let mama tell you what to do. You'll love this new era." ([59:03])
Conclusion: The episode "Journalists or Creators? How Media Entrepreneurs Are Reshaping News" provides an insightful exploration into the evolving landscape of media. Through candid conversations with industry leaders, Kara Swisher illuminates the resilience of legacy media, the rise of independent journalism, and the critical role of authenticity and innovation in navigating modern challenges. The panel underscores the importance of original reporting, strategic adaptation to technological advancements, and robust legal protections in sustaining quality journalism for the future.