
When two young girls vanish while out for an evening swim in May 2000, police in a southern Norwegian city scramble to find them. As the truth behind what happened to them begins to surface, one man’s story is pitted against the other's.
Loading summary
Scott Weinberger
I'm Scott Weinberger, investigative journalist and former deputy Sheriff.
Anna Sega Nicolasi
And I'm Anna Sega Nicolasi, former New York City Homicide prosecutor.
Scott Weinberger
We've each spent decades on the front lines of crime witnessing the devastation that violence leaves behind.
Anna Sega Nicolasi
And for us, the heart of these cases is the people involved, the victims whose stories deserve to be told and not forgotten.
Scott Weinberger
Every week on Anatomy of Murder, we dissect the layers of a homicide through the lens of those who know know them best, the families, the detectives, and.
Anna Sega Nicolasi
The prosecutors with experience that runs deep and access to those closest to each case. We take you well beyond the headlines.
Scott Weinberger
Listen to Anatomy of Murder wherever you get your podcasts. The psychological thriller Criminal Minds Evolution is back and the hunt is on. This season, the criminal profilers from the Behavioral Analysis Unit are tracking a network of serial killers connected by something far more dangerous than anyone expected. It's the kind of high stakes investigation that will keep you guessing and make you question who's really pulling the strings. With edge of your seat storytelling, this is the season to watch. Catch the new season of Criminal Minds Evolution, now Streaming exclusively on Paramount Plus.
Anna Sega Nicolasi
In 1932, one man opened a two room business school above a nondescript storefront in downtown Manchester, New Hampshire. How did it become one of the largest universities in the country? A okay, this case isn't exactly a mystery. Southern New Hampshire University offers over 200 degrees you can earn from your couch. And with low online tuition, Southern New Hampshire University makes earning your degree affordable too. Find your degree at SNHU. Edu ParkPredators. That's SNHU. Edu ParkPredigators. This episode is brought to you by Progressive, where drivers who save by switching save nearly $750 on average. Plus auto customers qualify for an average of 7 discounts. Quote now@progressive.com to see if you could save Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates national average 12 month savings of $744 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2022 and and May 2023. Potential savings will vary. Discounts not available in all states and situations. Hi park enthusiasts. I'm your host, Delia d' Ambra. And the story I'm going to share with you today is one that's filled with a lot of twists and turns, perhaps as many ups and downs as the hilly landscape it took place in. As a mother to a young child, it's one of those stories that genuinely broke my heart and is still a case I find myself thinking about in quiet moments. It happened in Norway's Vanahe recreation area in the city of Kristiansund 25 years ago. According to visitnorway.com, this area is a space that's easily accessible from nearby residential neighborhoods and known for being a great place to swim, fish and walk trails. Bannahaya consists of a three mile loop that AllTrails.com estimates takes the average person a little over an hour to finish. I'll go ahead and tell you up front. There are a lot of Norwegian names and pronunciations in this episode that I've tried my very best to deliver correctly. But I'm a native English speaker, so there may be some names or locations I don't say perfectly. That's just the reality of taking on a case in a nation that's foreign to me. But I didn't want that to stop me because this story is one that is vitally important for people everywhere to know about. This is Park Predators around 7:30pm On Friday, May 19, 2000, Ustein Sosternen was sitting at his home in the Grim borough of Kristiansand, Norway watching the clock. With each passing minute he was growing more and more worried. His 8 year old daughter Stina Sophia and her friend 10 year old Lena Paulsen were overdue from an evening swim in Banahia recreation area about an hour earlier. Around 6:30pm the girls had left the house together to go to lake number three in the park, which was only a few minutes away from Grim, and Ustein thought it was unusual for them to have taken so long to get to the lake, swim and then return so unsure what was going on. He did what I imagine most dads would do in this situation. He got on his bicycle and rode the trail the girls could have taken to get into Banahaya. He cycled all the way to the jetty at Lake Number 3, which is where his daughter and her friend had asked to go. But when he arrived the area was empty, no one was around, and he definitely didn't see the girl swimming in the lake. But he didn't go into full blown panic mode right away. He figured maybe Stina, Sofia and Laina had just taken another route home, which is where why he hadn't come across them on his way into the park. As he biked back to Grimm, he hoped that they might have taken another route home, but once again he didn't find them. When he returned to his neighborhood, he continued to ride around looking for them and even went over to another neighboring park called Ravna Dalin. But he was met with the same results the girls were nowhere to be found at that point. It was 10:10pm and the sun had already set. So Ustein decided enough was enough, and he alerted the Kristiansand police about what was going on. According to the available source material, it was at this time he officially reported the girls missing. When investigators filled out the missing persons reports, they relied on Ustein to give them information about the girls last movements. He explained that he'd given Stina Sofia and Lena permission to go swimming alone. And when they departed his house around 6:30pm Eustace, they'd been carrying their swimsuits, towels and a bottle of fizzy drink in a plastic grocery bag. According to the docuseries, the Bannahaya killings and additional reporting by Norwegian news outlets, Lena had made plans to sleep over with Sina Sophia Friday night while her father, who she was visiting for a few days, was out of town. You see, Stina Sofia and Laina's parents were both divorced and remarried, and so the two of them being in Grimm at their dad's homes that particular weekend was a result of the custody agreement their parents had worked out. Anyway, the reality that two young girls had gone missing in such a popular recreation area was concerning to the police. So they wasted no time organizing a formal search. And by the next morning, Saturday, May 20, helicopters, scent dogs, and more than 100 volunteers from the Red Cross and local communities descended on Banahaya to look for the girls. Law enforcement set up a command center in a parking lot next to a pond in the park, and from there they dispatched various search crews to comb the landscape for any sign of Lena and Stena Sofia. In order to cover as much ground as possible, volunteers split up into multiple groups, and each one focused on a different area of the park. The main grids of interest were near Lake Number 3, portions of neighboring Ravna Dahlin park and and another adjacent recreation space called Bimarca. These were all woodland areas that investigators suspected the girls might have gotten lost in. And I say gotten lost because that's genuinely the mindset law enforcement had. During that first day of searching, Christiansand's police chief of staff told reporters that the department was simply treating the case as a missing persons investigation. At that time, investigators had found nothing that indicated the girls had fallen victim to a crime. So basically, until the police had more information or evidence to go off of, they had to consider all possible scenarios. And for whatever reason, at the top of their theory list was the optimistic notion that the girls had simply gotten lost. As the search continued, volunteers walked in lines several meters away from one another and scoured the landscape for any trace of the girls. If they found something of interest, they were instructed to holler out the word, here, here. But unfortunately, that didn't happen. As Saturday dragged on, teams were assigned to look in sections of the forest west of the swimming area that Lena and Stena Sophia were supposed to have visited. But again, they came up empty handed. Seemingly, even the dogs that were being used to try and locate the girls hadn't picked up their scents. As Saturday came to a close, things were looking bleak. It had been more than 24 hours since since the girls vanished. But search crews refused to give up. They continued to work throughout the night, and law enforcement held a press conference that evening and released photos of both girls to the public in an attempt to drum up leads that might explain where they were. On Sunday morning, May 21, with still no sign of them, journalists and some volunteers began to suspect that something untoward had happened. One searcher named Stein Borgerson told producers for the Bannahaya killings docuseries that he felt compelled to travel to Kristiansand and help out with the search. He didn't live in town, but he was the regional head of a youth organization known as the Home Guard, which trained boys and girls ages 16 to 21 how to survive in the outdoors and how to handle weapons safely. Stein was kind of a great asset to bring on in the search effort because he had survivalist and tracking skills that not everyone involved specialized in. When he came on board on Sunday, he brought a team of folks with him to Banahaya and was genuinely hoping to make a difference in the search. But for the first few hours of the day, there wasn't much progress. Divers searched lake number three just in case Lena and Stina Sofia had ended up there. But frustratingly, they didn't find anything. Later that day, a 17 year old volunteer named Annette reported to the search's command center that a male volunteer she'd spoken with said he'd found a piece of clothing off a nearby trail. Administrators instructed Annette and the other searcher to go back to the spot and follow up. When they did, they realized it was in a low lying area near the base of a stone retention wall located roughly 100 or 200 meters off the trail. In order to thoroughly search it, Annette and her companion had to get down on their knees. As they started pulling out multiple pieces of clothing, they realized that the items had clearly been intentionally put there, either hidden or just obscured from plain view. The items included a bikini bottom A white cap, a silver sandal, a top, a blue cap, a blue swimsuit, and a towel with a dolphin on it. As the pair removed each item, Annette noticed the stuff was covered in blood, which gave her a sinking feeling. Piece by piece, they placed the items inside a bag Annette had brought with her and by 4:30pm she and the other searcher helping her had delivered everything to the command center. Not long after that, officials in charge of the search sentence sent Stein Borgeson and his team to secure the spot where the stuff had been found. Christianson police requested additional police dogs to come to the area to investigate further, but unfortunately the animals weren't available at the moment. So Stein and his team basically just had to sit and wait it out. But it didn't take very long before Stein got bored of that and decided to walk around the site and do his own sweep for clues. As he walked around, he noticed that some of the vegetation near the spot seemed to be unnaturally broken. He observed a snapped twig on a large pine tree that felt off to him. What I gathered from reading and watching the source material is that to Stein, the twig just looked like it had been intentionally broken, not as if it had been snapped in a natural way. So I guess him being the woodland expert he was, he just had a gut feel feeling that the broken twig seemed out of place. So he followed that hunch and continued to look around for more clues. A short distance away from the snap twig, he saw what he believed was an unusual area of elevation on the ground covered in vegetation. To him, the disturbed earth appeared to be man made. And when he approached it and lifted up some branches, he discovered a gruesome sight that confirmed his worst suspicions. There, underneath all the debris were the dead bodies of Laina and Stena. Sofia, has your kid asked for help with homework? Or maybe your child's ahead of the curve and getting bored in class. Whether your kid is struggling or soaring, IXL can make a real difference. IXL is an award winning online learning platform that helps kids really understand what they're learning. It covers math, language arts, science and social studies from pre K all the way through 12th grade. It's designed to be engaging, personalized and yes, actually fun with encouraging feedback that keeps kids motivated. Don't miss out. IXL is used in 96 of the top 100 school districts in the U.S. 1 in 4 students in the U.S. are learning with IXL. My son just turned 3 so I am already thinking about what am I going to use. And honestly I didn't have to look far because IXL speaks for itself. Make an impact on your child's learning. Get IXL now and Park Predators listeners can get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when they sign up today at ixl.comparc Visit ixl.comparc to get the most effective learning program out there at the best price. As temperatures climb, it's easy to fall into the same old routine. Familiar tanks worn in shorts, the usual lineup. Quints offers an effortless upgrade elevated easy pieces that instantly refine the everyday uniform without the extra effort, like 100% European linen shorts and dresses from $30 and so much more. The best part? Everything with Quint's is priced 50 to 80% less than what you'd find at similar brands. By working directly with top artisans and cutting out the middlemen, Quint's gives you luxury without the markup. I have been really into wearing cute sneakers lately and I found a pair on Quint that were suede and just honestly really my style and when I looked at them compared to other brand I was getting a steal. So what are you waiting for? Treat your closet to a little summer glow up with Quince. Go to Quince.comParkPredators for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's Q U I N C E.comParkPredators to get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.comParkPredators a few hours after the discovery of the girls bodies, the Christiansund police held a press conference and delivered the heartbreaking news to the media. The investigators missing persons case had officially become a homicide investigation. Back at the crime scene, detectives called in a specialized forensic unit from the National Criminal Investigation Service, also known as ncis, to help process the scene and remove the girls bodies. But there was a bit of a snag that special forensic team wouldn't be able to get to Bannahaya until the following morning, Monday, May 22nd. So while everyone waited, Stein Borgerson, the outdoorsman who'd found the bodies, ordered 70 of his team members to keep watch over the burial site overnight to make sure no one disturbed the bodies or contaminated the crime scene. When Monday morning came around, teams were finally able to remove Laina and Stena Sofia's bodies from the park and they transported them for autopsies. While investigators waited for those examinations to conclude, they got to work trying to understand the crime scene itself. But once again, they ran into some logistical challenges. You see, Sunday night into Monday morning, rainy weather had moved into the area. So in an attempt to preserve potential evidence, the police used an officer's personal tarp to cover the burial site where Stina Sophia and Lena had been hidden. I'd imagine that when that detail leaked to the press, journalists speculated that the tarp situation might not have been the best call by the police. You know, considering the fact that it had been used and was a personal possession of one of the officers. But used tarp or not, the NCIS team processed the area where the girls bodies had been found, and it became evident right away that whoever had put them there made a concerted effort to conceal their bodies from view. The killer or killers had laid lots of twigs and vegetation over top of them, which folks at the scene believed would have taken some time to do. The location of the burial site was roughly 75 meters off the designated trail that ran alongside the west side of lake number two, so not exactly close to lake number three, which is where the girls were supposed to have been swimming. To me, that indicates that their attacker or attackers forced them to that location or got them there somehow because it was a spot they had not told Steena Sofia's father they were planning to go to anyway. A few meters away from where they'd been buried, investigators found another suspicious location in the forest. There was a large amount of blood on the ground there, which indicated to authorities that the murders and burial had occurred in separate locations. Investigators thoroughly collected physical evidence from all of these areas and even cut out a small section of the forest floor to examine later on for traces of hair or other potentially relevant debris. Meanwhile, the girls autopsies revealed that they'd both been sexually assaulted and killed with a sharp object like a knife. Stina Sofia had been stabbed once in the neck and Lena had been stabbed three times, twice in the neck and once in the chest. The wound to her chest had sliced through her shirt, which meant she was clothed when she was attacked. Something else noteworthy about their clothing was that when Lena and Steena Sofia were discovered, they were wearing one another's trousers. A detail that I have to assume stuck out as odd to investigators. According to what a forensic consultant told producers of the Bannahaya killings docuseries, the girls wearing one another's trousers suggested that whoever had killed them possibly took the time to redress them after sexually assaulting them. But before killing them, and while doing that, their clothing had clearly gotten mixed up. This forensic consultant also believed that the wounds to both girls necks were extremely similar and had likely come from the same sharp weapon, which begged the question had the killer or killers taken the knife or sharp object with them, or could it still be in the park somewhere? Unfortunately, additional searches for it on Monday were unsuccessful because the forest, hilly terrain and numerous lakes made it very challenging for searchers to scour for such a small item. As crews continued to work, news about the murders began to circulate in Kristiansand. It didn't take long before the story blew up. People wanted to know everything about the police's investigation, who any potential suspects were, who the victims were, and so on. One journalist told producers of the Bannahaya killings docuseries that the city as a whole essentially went into a state of emergency because of what had happened. Parents told reporters that they were watching their children more closely after the crime and they felt like the murders had completely shattered Christianson's previous reputation as being a family friendly place to live. The girls deaths had a profound effect on other children and people in the city too, who were friends with or roughly the same age as Lena and Stina. Sophia Annette, the 17 year old volunteer who'd first discovered what was believed to be the girl's bloody clothing and belongings, told the docuseries that she was horrified by the crime and became afraid of the dark after it happened. She said that she didn't go back to Banahaya for 20 years afterwards. The thought that there was some unknown child killer potentially walking amongst the citizens of Kristiansand scared a lot of people. Authorities were under tremendous pressure to make headway in the case. But despite what police relayed to the public about their progress to investigate the crime, there were some major errors in the investigation that happened during those first few days that opened them up to a lot of scrutiny. For example, six days after the murders, park employees emptying out trash bins in the forest discovered that none of the receptacles had been secured by law enforcement at any point after the crime. While making their rounds, these employees had unknowingly discovered a major piece of evidence just sitting in one of the bins. It was the plastic grocery bag that Laina and Stena Sofia had taken with them when they went swimming. According to what an investigator and lawyer told producers for the Bannahaya killings docuseries, it took another week after the park workers collected the trash bins for the police to actually go through them. So investigators were way behind the eight ball by the time they got their hands on the plastic grocery bag evidence. And just like the used tarp situation, some members of the press criticized the police for the trash bin mistake. But be that as it may, what's more important in the overall scheme of things is that authorities did eventually secure the grocery bag as evidence. They determined that it had been discarded in a bin near a football field on the northeast side of the park, next to a neighborhood of Christianson called Egg. The football field took roughly eight minutes to walk to from Lake Number three. So it was a feasible distance for the killer or killers to have traversed after the killings if they were the person who put the bag there. With the crime scene processed and the plastic bag in their possession, the police continued to try and find everyone who'd visited Banahaya on the evening of the crime to see if anyone suspicious had been in the key areas of interest. They spoke with several witnesses who helped them narrow down the timeline of when the murders had taken place. One witness, who'd been walking on a trail that led from Stena Sofia's neighborhood to lake number three, said that around 6:35pm they'd bumped into the girls as they made their way to the swimming hole. Authorities also interviewed two university students who said they'd been swimming at Lake Number 3 around 6:35pm and they also remembered seeing Lena and Stena Sofia. The students told police that they'd left around 6:50pm and when they last saw the two girls, they were playing in the water by themselves. Another witness who came forward said they'd been out for a run and made a lap around lake number three at around 7:05pm however, they didn't remember seeing anyone in the water at that time. Several witnesses who'd also been at Lake Number 3 around 7 o' clock reported the same thing, that the girls were not in the water. So taking all of these statements into account, the police realized that whatever had happened to Lena and Stena Sophia had most likely occurred sometime between 6:50pm and 7:05pm as part of their investigation, they checked in with several known sex offenders in the city and canvassed an area of Kristiansund that was a known hangout for substance users. But no concrete suspects emerged. Authorities even looked into patients at a psychiatric hospital in the Egg neighborhood. But just like with the canvas of the registered sex offenders, no one surfaced as a viable suspect. Other efforts by the police to try and identify the perpetrator or perpetrators involved checking local ferry and air manifests and license plates on cars, as well as looking at surveillance footage. But it seemed like no matter how wide of a net they cast, nothing helped push the investigation forward. Detectives even obtained phone traffic data from the local Telephone companies that serviced the region. But analyzing all of that data was going to take some time. While they waited, officers hit the streets hard and canvassed door to door in neighborhoods around the park that butted up to the forest. This included Grimm, where Steena, Sophia and Laina departed from, as well as Egg, the neighborhood closest to the football field where the plastic grocery bag had been thrown away. A lot of residents in those neighborhoods gave police names of people they felt investigators should look at as potential suspects. But out of everyone on the list, two names emerged that authorities felt were worth taking a serious look at. They were 19 year old Jan Helga Andersson and 21 year old Viggo Christiansson. The two young men were close friends who were from Egg and had reputations for playing what residents referred to as war games in their neighborhood. At some point in the investigation, authorities had received an anonymous letter about them that stated, quote, to the investigators of the child murders in Bannahaya, we advise you to check out two youths in the Egg area who've been frightening local children for a long time. They're Viggo Christiansen and Jan Helga Andersson. They've been behaving strangely for some time. They play war games, climb trees, dress up as soldiers. I find this odd because they are adults. End quote. During door to door canvassing on May 22, three days into the investigation, authorities spoke with Viggo and Jan Helge at their respective homes. Viggo's alibi for the evening of the crime was that he'd been home with his parents until around 10pm he said they'd left to go for a walk around ten o' clock and he'd stayed back to babysit his three year old nephew. At some point earlier in the evening, he remembered, Jan Helga had shown up to hang out and when he was done babysitting his nephew, they'd sat outside in his backyard together until about 11:30 or 11:45pm Jan Helge's statements during police's door to door canvassing was similar to Viggo's. He said he'd gone over to Viggo's house around 8pm but briefly went home to take a shower between 8:30 and 8:45, then returned and hung out with Viggo until just before midnight. Without much else to confront the young men with, investigators had to let their suspicions about them just sit. For the time being, authorities prioritized digging further into the young men's backgrounds. But they were also looking at other potential suspects and focused on developing a criminal profile. Of the offender. You know, to get a better idea of the type of individual who would be capable of carrying out such a violent crime. The results of the profiling work indicated that the crime had been committed by only one person, A male who'd viewed Lena and Stina Sofia as victims of opportunity. Whoever the killer was, he was an ordinary individual who few people would suspect of committing such a heinous crime. What's interesting is that j' Angelga generally fit that characterization. He was a young man who didn't have any major criminal red flags in his background and was described as a shy, quiet, polite teenager who was an active member of the Home Guard Youth Division in Kristiansand, which I mentioned earlier was that training program for young people who wanted to learn about weapons and survival skills. Viggo, on the other hand, was slightly older than Jan Helga, and he'd engaged in criminal behavior in the past, which had earned him a reputation of being a bit of a troublemaker. His brother confirmed for producers of the Bannahaya killings docuseries that Viggo had done some bad things during his youth. But every time he was caught for his crimes or confronted with allegations he. He'd admitted to whatever it was he'd done. Other source material I found stated that between 1994 and 1996, he sexually assaulted several minors while he was a minor himself. The source material states that he eventually confessed to those crimes and was convicted of those offenses. While investigators absorbed the results of the offender profile and compared it to Viggo and Angelge, trying to figure out if they could be involved, they received testing results for items of evidence that had been collected at the crime scene. Investigators learned that a single male pubic hair had been discovered on one of the victim's bodies. Curious as to who it belonged to, they sent it off for additional testing. But those results wouldn't come back for at least a few months. Meanwhile, on May 30, 11 days after the crime, residents of Christiansen gathered for Lena and Stena Sofia's funerals at a cathedral in town. Lena's casket was decorated with flowers and candles, and her father, Arne, gave a speech thanking everyone in attendance for sharing the pain that he and his ex wife Clara were going through. He described their grief as difficult, but wanted to celebrate the good memories they'd made with their only daughter. He said, quote, we are privileged to have experienced 10 good years with Lena. Today. I'm determined that she smiles where she is. Lena taught me and her mother gratitude. She could call her mother and say, how are you? I just wanted to hear your voice. End quote. Arne's speech was followed by a statement from the mayor with other family members laying wreaths close to her casket and several of her classmates placing roses on her coffin. The next day, a memorial march was held inside the park in the girl's honor. More than 2,000 adults and children attended and walked on the trail from Grimm to the swimming lake where they left teddy bears and notes as they marched around. That same time, police really began to look further into Viggo and Jan Helga because additional tips had come in that seemed to point the finger right in their direction, particularly in Jan Helge's direction. According to the docuseries, the Banahaya Killings, three witnesses had come forward shortly after the crime and said that they'd seen a suspicious looking man lingering near one of the restroom facilities along lake number between 9 and 10 o'clock on Thursday, May 18, the night before Lena and Stena Sofia were killed. The first of these three witnesses described the suspicious man as squatting on the ground. The second witness said he was wearing a tracksuit and standing between the toilet facility and the woods, just staring at something in the landscape. The third witness was a woman who told police that when she'd first seen the man, he'd initially frightened her. But that feeling quickly went away because when she got closer to him, she'd recognized him as none other than Jan Helga Andersson, a teenage boy she was familiar with. She told police that she'd greeted Jan Helga by saying hi, but he didn't really engage with her. So after she did another lap, she saw him again and asked him if he was still there, to which he responded yes, and mentioned that he was just there waiting for someone to meet him. Additional reports of Jan Helga being in the park the night before the murders also surfaced during the course of police's investigation. One report came from the mother of a boy who was in the Home Guard Youth Division with Jan Helga. This woman told police that her son had been running in Bannahaya and bumped into Jan Helga while he was sitting by a tree. Her son described Jan Helga as acting strangely in that he seemed like he was, quote, about to lose it. End quote. The 19 year old declined an invitation to join his Home Guard buddy for a run and when the two parted ways, he remained sitting alone by the tree. On June 4, 16 days after the murders, the police asked Jean Helga and Viggo to come into the police station for questioning. The young men agreed to talk. But when they gave their statements, law enforcement began to notice a few differences between the stories they'd provided to police on May 22 and during the door knock interviews and the version of events they were presently giving. For example, Viggo told police during his sit down interview that he'd been at his house from 6 to 9 o' clock on Friday, May 19, but in his first chat with police, he'd said he was home the entire night. So this deviation from his previous statement made authorities side eye him. When given the chance to clarify if he'd been in Banahia at all on May 19, he told them he hadn't been. Yon Helga's story the first time he'd been questioned was that he'd started hanging out with Viggo around 8 o' clock on the evening of the crime. However, during his sit down interview with police, he said he'd been at the entrance to Bannahaya a few hours before going to Viggo's house. He said he'd been at the park because the Home Guard Youth Division usually met for a training run every Friday from 6 to 8pm however, on Friday, May 19, none of his buddies had shown up for the scheduled exercise, so he'd done it by himself. He told investigators that he'd run north in the park, passed some fields and lakes, then returned via the same route and eventually ended at Biggo's house in Egg. Investigators weren't sure if the young men were being 100% honest with them, though, but without anything more incriminating to confront them with, the police once again had to let their suspicions about them lay. But that didn't last long, because shortly after that, detectives heard from a witness who'd been walking in the park at 6:30pm on the night of the crime. This witness told investigators that they'd seen a young man emerge from the woods near the football field adjacent to Egg who seemed to be searching for something. They told police that the mysterious figure appeared to be between 18 and 20 years old, and after seeing him the first time near the football field, they bumped into him again on the west side of the trail closer to the swimming lakes. Authorities showed this witness a photo array of 10 young men, and wouldn't you know it, he picked out Jan Helga's picture without hesitation. So this development all but confirmed for police their growing suspicion that Jan Helga had not been truthful with them the first few times around. The fact that someone had seen him on a trail in the park in the Opposite direction of where he'd told authorities he'd been at 6:30pm was enough of an inconsistency for police to bring him back in for another round of questioning. At that time, detectives didn't ask Viggo for another interview, though they were strictly focused on speaking with Jan Helga. During this questioning, I imagine investigators got a bit more direct with him, but he denied being in the west part of the park. On the Evening of Friday, May 19, he insisted that he hadn't gone past the entrance gate. He doubled down about this even when authorities confronted him with the information from the witness who said they'd bumped into him on the west side of the swimming lakes at 6:30pm but once again, like it or not, the police didn't have enough evidence to hold him for additional questioning or arrest him. But that changed Sometime later, on July 11, when investigators received even more information that made Jean Helga and Viggo look bad. A guy who'd been parking a car near an entrance to the park alongside Egg on the night of the crime came forward and told police that he'd seen a young man ride up to the location on a bicycle around 5:50pm Go into the park in the direction of lake number three, and then return a few minutes later with another boy walking next to him. Though this witness didn't recognize the young men he saw, police felt pretty sure it was Jan Helga and viggo. So on July 14, continuing to follow their hunch about the young men, investigators brought both of them back in for questioning. By this point, the murder investigation had been underway for almost two months, and it was safe to say that Viggo and Jan Helga were law enforcement's prime suspects. During Viggo's interview, he admitted to police that he'd forgotten to tell them he'd ridden his bike to Banahaya on the evening of Friday, May 19th. Earlier that day, he said he'd gotten locked out of a shed he spent a lot of time in behind his parents house. And Jan Helga was the only other person with a spare key. So around 5:45pm he'd called Jan Helga's house to ask him for the key. But his dad answered and told him his son was in Banahia going for a run. Shortly after that, Biggo had ridden his bike into the park and cycled up to lake number three to look for his friend and eventually found him back at the playground next to the entrance of the park closest to Egg. This would have all been happening between 5.45pm and 6.05ish p.m. so before Stina, Sofia and Lena had even left Stena Sofia's house. But regardless of the timing being seemingly irrelevant to the crime, Viggo's story did put him and Jan Helga together at the park within an hour of when the authorities believed the girls had been killed. Which made investigators seriously suspect that perhaps the young men had committed the crime together. I mean, even though the criminal offender profile indicated the killer was one person, it wasn't outside the realm of possibility that two people could have been involved. During Angelga's interview, he corroborated a lot of the same information Vigo had provided. The two of them had met up around 6 o' clock at the playground near the park entrance by egg so Viggo could get the spare key to his shed. And then by 6:05pm they'd parted ways. Angelges said he'd then gone for a run north and Viggo had cycled home. When their interviews with police wrapped up, authorities were more convinced than ever that the young men were hiding something. So they decided to see if they could search their homes and Viggo's backyard shed an egg to determine if it held any clues that might be related to the murders. The only problem was investigators couldn't physically carry out the search without charging Viggo or Jan Helga with a crime. Interestingly, the police found a way around that legal hurdle by resurrecting a previous criminal investigation that had involved Viggo. Turns out about 16 months before Steena, Sofia and Lena's murders, Viggo had been suspected of peeping into a woman's windows in his neighborhood. He eventually came clean about that crime and was said to be remorseful for his actions. But because it was an unresolved criminal case that allowed the police a way to legally search his shed. And when they did, what they found inside was disturbing.
Scott Weinberger
The psychological thriller Criminal Minds Evolution is back and the hunt is on. This season, the criminal profilers from the behavioral analysis unit are tracking a network of serial killers connected by something far more dangerous than anyone expected. It's the kind of high stakes investigation that will keep you guessing and make you question who's really pulling the strings with edge of your seat storytelling. This is the season to watch. Catch, the new season of Criminal Minds Evolution. Now streaming exclusively on Paramount.
Delia d'Ambra
Plus, you know that feeling when someone shows up for you just when you need it most? Yeah, I mean, we all need that. That's what Uber is all about. Not just a ride or dinner at your door. It's how Uber helps you show up for the moments that matter. Because showing up can turn a tough day around or make a good one even better. Whatever it is, big or small, Uber is on the way. So you can be on yours. Uber on our way.
Anna Sega Nicolasi
According to the docuseries, the Banahia killings were when authorities got a look inside Viggo's backyard shed and egg, they found a trove of pornographic videos, magazines, violent movies and adult toys. There was also a toolbox with a couple of knives in it, which I imagine seemed rather ominous to police detectives, considering the fact that Stena, Sofia and Lena had both been stabbed and the murder weapon had never been found. A local journalist who spoke with the producers for the documentary described Viggo's shed as less of a utility shed and more of like an old potato cellar that had been con into a man cave of sorts, and it was even reported that he lived in it. What the contents of the shed communicated to members of law enforcement who were eyeing him and Jan Helga for the Banahaya murders was that he was a young man who liked knives and was obsessed with sex. Unfortunately, even after all the interviews police had done with the young men and the results of the shed search, there still wasn't enough physical evidence for detectives to arrest them for the crime. Now, don't get me wrong, there were definitely some investigators who were chomping at the bit to slap cuffs on Viggo and Jean Helga, but there were also others who, I guess, had more say, who knew the case likely wouldn't hold up in court. That changed, though, just a few weeks later in August, three months after the murders. At that time, the police were still in the process of trying to determine the identity of the pubic hair that had been found on one of the victims. They were certain it had come from the perpetrator, but without a DNA match, the hair's true source remained a mystery. Thankfully, they got their answer a few weeks later in early September, when test results for the hair in question came back as a match for none other than Jan Helge. I don't know exactly how police got a sample of his DNA for comparison, but I have to assume they did at some point, either voluntarily or covertly, because otherwise I don't know how they would have determined that it belonged to him. But regardless, with the DNA match confirmed, authorities were finally able to move in on and arrest Jean Helga and viggo. And on September 13, police charged both of them with sexual assault and murder. When investigators sat them down and got them talking, their stories were drastically different. Yanhelga quickly confessed to being involved in the girls murders, but said that he'd only killed Stina Sofia, not Lena. He said he'd never wanted to partake in the crime, but Viggo had forced him to. He explained that he and his friend had bumped into the girls as they got out of Lake Number three and that Viggo had asked for their help finding some kittens in the woods. The girls agreed to join the young men, but eventually Viggo pulled out a knife and threatened them. Then he sexually assaulted Lena, stabbed her, sexually assaulted Stina Sofia and then threatened Jan Helga to kill her, which he said he did out of fear of what Viggo would do to him if he didn't. Viggo's version of events, on the other hand, were entirely different. He denied any involvement in the murders and maintained his innocence in spite of his friend painting him as the mastermind. Essentially, it came down to the younger of the two suspects pointing the finger at the older one and calling him the ringleader, which I imagine is a narrative that police investigators had already started to invest in. But until they heard it from Jan Helga's mouth directly, they just hadn't run very far with it. Shortly after the arrest, the police held a press conference and told folks that all along they'd been operating under the assumption that two people had sexually assaulted and killed Steena, Sofia and Lena, which, based on what I gathered from reading the source material, was definitely a change in tune for police. But regardless of whether they were saying that because it really was their theory all along or they were just trying to save face, the fact that they'd arrested someone for the crime was what most folks were paying attention to. Residents of Kristiansson were extremely relieved that the killers had reportedly been caught. A few months later, in mid-February 2001, Viggo and Jan Helga were indicted and by June 1 each had been tried, convicted and sent sentenced to prison. Jan Helga received 17 years and Viggo was sentenced to 21 years. From what I gathered in the available source material, the court relied heavily on Jan Helga's version of events, which penned Viggo as the mastermind of the whole thing. Essentially, the judges determined that it was Viggo who'd carried out the murders to cover up the fact that he'd sexually assaulted both Stina Sofia and Lena. As time passed, though, Viggo and the people who supported him continued to protest his innocence. They claimed that Jan Helga had lied in his confession and Viggo was never involved in the crime. But no one could understand why Ang Helga would rope Viggo into something so horrific if in fact it wasn't true. The judges who decided the young men's fate certainly couldn't find a motive for Jan Helga pointing the finger at his friend unless it was actually what happened. The court stated. Quote, the court places trust in Andersen's statement that he was with Christensen at the relevant time. The two were very good friends and it's not possible to see a motive for Andersen to wrongfully involve Christensen in the case, end quote. But a law professor who spoke with producers for the Bannahaya killings docuseries pointed out that Janelga would have been really motivated to say Viggo was involved in the crime because by doing so he essentially deflected a lot of blame away from himself. Basically, Yonhelga benefited from saying that it was Viggo, the 21 year old, who'd influenced him, a 19 year old, to partake in such a heinous act. In the end, Jarnhelger received less prison time and the media didn't paint him as the main perpetrator. Court documents filed during an appeal in January 2002 stated that forensic psychiatric experts who'd evaluated Viggo shared in court that he had an emotionally unstable personality disorder, was emotionally unstable and had pedophilic tendencies, which is Norway's 2002 way of saying what is commonly known in the US as borderline personality disorder. Ultimately, the appeals court denied him relief, but agreed to increase Jan helga's sentence from 17 years to 19 years. In a statement to TV2, which was later translated into English, Ada Stina, Sofia's mom, said, said, quote, we can never be completely satisfied when the court does not choose to use the law's strictest punishment. Nevertheless, we are happy that Jan Helge Andersson did not even get less than 19 years, end quote. By 2006, though, Norway's government had granted Jan Helga temporary leave from prison one weekend every month, much to the dismay of the girl's family members, particularly Ada. She complained to the Oslo District Court more than once and actually ended up suing the state over the issue. By 2007, she was able to successfully change the law so that survivors of serious criminal cases could object to a prisoner receiving leave and so could their relatives. In 2008, while serving his time in prison, Viggo gave his first public interview to reporter Anna Norberg and maintained that he was not responsible for for what happened to Steena, Sofia and Lena. He claimed he'd been convicted based on people's feelings, not evidence. He remained as resolved as ever to fight for his exoneration. He wanted a retrial period. Up until that point, he'd never admitted guilt and there was no physical evidence that proved he was involved. It had always been Jan Helga's word against his. After fully taking over Viggo's case in 2002, his post conviction lawyer spent over five years sending half a dozen requests to Norway's Criminal Cases Review Commission explaining why Viggo should get a new trial. Those documents argued a few things that his defense team felt proved that he could not have committed the crime. One had to do with his cell phone activity during the timeframe the girls were killed. The defense team had reviewed every text message and phone call he'd made on Friday, May 19, 2000 and they discovered that between 7pm and 8pm, which was the time frame authorities believed the murders happened, Viggos device had made calls and received and sent text messages in a service area that was close to his home, but well outside the coverage area of the crime scene. Experts from local phone companies determined without a doubt that the base station his cell phone activity went through could not have received signals from devices anywhere near the crime scene. Oh, and these experts, they had decades of experience working for the various phone companies in Kristiansand who owned the telephone signal infrastructure. So they knew their stuff and were the most qualified people to ascertain this information. In addition to the cell phone activity analysis, Viggo's defense team also wanted the DNA evidence that had been presented at his trial to be re evaluated. The only DNA that had ever been found and identified conclusively from the crime scene was Jan Helga. It was revealed during the men's trial that another profile had also been discovered. But a forensic crime lab in Spain couldn't determine for sure if it belonged to Viggo or Jan Helga or another person. So basically the lab could only say that the sample contained traces of male DNA and neither Viggo nor Jan Helga could be ruled out as a contributor. What's wild though, is that a DNA analyst who spoke with producers for the Berhaya killings docuseries said the DNA findings from the Spanish lab were in her opinion, weak or procedurally imprecise. For example, she said that whenever a male DNA profile is evaluated as evidence in a criminal case, a lot of different boxes have to be checked in order to determine its legitimacy. At the time of the docuseries filming, it was typical that anywhere from 17 to 30 areas of the profile had to be tested to assess it for direct comparison to a known individual. But back in the day, in Viggo and Jan Helga's case, the unknown male DNA profile had only been tested in one location, one so like well below the acceptable standard, at least according to that forensic analyst who spoke with the docuseries. Which is why Viggo's defense team demanded the DNA evidence be reevaluated to either include him or exclude him once and for all. By this point, a lot of questions had also started to surface about the integrity of Jan Helga's confession and more so how law enforcement elicited it from him. ABC News reported that a retired FBI profiler named Greg McCrary had reviewed the Kristiansand police's interrogation of Jan Helga and discovered numerous issues with the way investigators went about questioning the then 19 year old. For example, McCreary wrote in his report that detectives had first suggested to Jan Helga that two people were involved in the crime and that maybe he'd been influenced by Viggo. McCrary also believed that the DNA evidence allegedly linking Viggo to the crime had been misstated. To make matters even more complicated, in 2016, after only serving 16 of his 19 years in prison, Jan Helga was paroled and got out early. He moved to a city in Norway about 2 1/2 hours northeast of Kristiansand. NRK reported that because he wasn't shying away from coming to the city, some of the victim's family members were concerned they would potentially see him out and about which I imagine was the last thing they wanted. Meanwhile, Viggo's defense team continued to fight for his innocence in court. They petitioned his case six times, but were rejected. However, by 2020, their seventh attempt was granted. Norway's Criminal Cases Review Commission decided to formally review Viggo's claim and take a fresh look at the double murder case. That same year, Lena and Stena, Sofia's parents, spoke out publicly for the first time as a collective group about how they felt regarding his claims. They stated to NRK that they were tired of the case still dragging on. At that point, it had been 20 years since their daughters were murdered, and even though they agreed that Viggo should get a retrial if he was potentially innocent, they were not convinced that he and his legal team had discovered anything new in the case that merited it being Rehashed. It took a few months for Norway's Commission for the Resumption of Criminal Cases to thoroughly review Viggo's petition. But on June 1, 2021, the country's supreme Court finally ruled on the matter and the news was a bombshell. He was no longer suspected of the crime. As a result of the court's ruling, he was released from prison. And a few months later, in November 2021, the previously unknown male DNA profile that had been analyzed but never conc. Conclusively identified was tested again. The results confirmed it belonged to Jan Helga Andersson, not Viggo. Most importantly, additional testing carried out during Viggo's post conviction fight revealed Jan Helga's DNA was also in three different places on evidence samples collected from Lena's body and clothing. That information directly contradicted his previous confession in which he said he'd only killed Stena Sofia. Basically, it brought into question all of his previous testimony, which the police and trial court had relied so heavily on back in 2000 and 2001. In 2022, the year after the new DNA results came in, Viggo was formally exonerated of the Banahaya murders. And Norway's Director of Public Prosecutions publicly apologized for the office's role in wrongfully convicting him a few months later. Months later, In March of 2023, the criminal case against Jan Helga, specifically for Lena's murder, was requested to be reopened. And in June, that's exactly what happened. It took some time for the court to do its thing, but a little over a year later, In July of 2024, he was convicted of Lena's death and sentenced to additional prison time. TV2 reported that Lena's parents, Arne and Clara, attended the trial and testified as witnesses. According to coverage by nrk, when it came time for sentencing, Jan Helga only got two years for his role in killing Lena. I don't know for sure how the laws work in Norway, but I have to assume that maybe one reason his sentence was so short was because he'd already served 16 years before being paroled early. Maybe two years was like the maximum amount of time the court could give him in light of everything that had happened and the fact that prosecuting him for Elena's death was so delayed. But even with getting so little punishment, Angelka's defense team announced they would appeal his conviction. According to coverage by NRK, in September 2024 he was granted a new trial, which is scheduled to take place in 2025. The girl's parents have filed their own civil case in court, claiming they've endured lost wages and mental anguish throughout these many years of going to court. Throughout the years, the girl's parents also criticized local and international media outlets for sensationalizing their daughters stories. They described the experience of having books, podcasts and documentaries made about the murders as distracting, painful and sad. They emphasized that they didn't want the tragedy they'd experienced to become entertainment for people. I hope if they hear this episode, they understand that's not what I or audiochuck is about. What happened to Lena and Stena Sophia was a tragedy that should be handled with extreme care. As a storyteller, it's why I haven't gone into the details that some publications and court records have, and it's also what makes the why behind telling this story so important. I believe that the girl's case is one that, in spite of all the tragedy to Stena Sofia's mother, Ada's point should and can have some good come out of it. Shortly after the Banahaya murders happened, Stena Sofia's mother, Ada, established a foundation in her daughter's honor, aptly called the Stena Sofia Foundation. That organization fights for children's rights, educates kids, and advocates for minors who've suffered violence or abuse. Staff members also help relatives of murdered children navigate the criminal justice system. In connection with this episode, Audiochuck has committed to donating $5,000 to the Stena Sofia foundation, funds that will go to support the organization's mission to advocate for minors and protect those who've suffered violence or abuse. We've dropped a link to their website in our show notes for this episode where you can learn more about the foundation and donate as well if you're able to. For more than a decade after the crime, when the organization's first coping center was built, Ada and her team used a coffin as a foundational stone for the structure. Placed inside of that coffin was a silver piece of jewelry, like a necklace that had a teddy bear pendant on it. This accessory was something Stena Sofia had been wearing when she was killed. Years after the murders, police had given it back to Ada, and she couldn't think of a more appropriate item to put inside the cornerstone of the building. She told NRK that the necklace would act as a symbol for every child who hadn't made it out of a violent situation or who would never get the chance to stay at the foundation's coping center. In so many ways, I'm in awe of Ada's resilience as a parent. She and her ex husband Ustein, as well as Lena's parents Arne and Clara, should be people you think about when you turn off this episode. Viggo should also cross your mind. He was wrongfully convicted of a crime that he didn't commit. It just goes to show you that the Criminal Offender Profile which had been developed by the NCIS so many years earlier, which indicated that only one person was behind the crime, was in the end, right? Park Predators is an Audio Chuck production. You can view a list of all the source material for this episode on our website parkpredators.com and you can also follow parkpredators on Instagram arcpredators. So what do you think Chuck? Do you approve?
Delia d'Ambra
You know that feeling when someone shows up for you just when you need it most?
Anna Sega Nicolasi
Yeah.
Delia d'Ambra
I mean, we all need that. That's what Uber's all about. Not just a ride or dinner at your door. It's how Uber helps you show up for the moments that matter. Because showing up can turn a tough day around. Or make a good one even better. Whatever it is, big or small, Uber is on the way. So you can be on yours. Uber on our way.
Scott Weinberger
Some say Odoo business management software is like fertilizer because of the way it promotes growth. Some say Odoo is like a magic beanstalk scaling with you while being magically affordable. And some say Odoo's programs for manufacturing, accounting and more are like building blocks for creating a custom software suite. But I say Odoo is all of it. Fertilizer, magic beanstalk building blocks for business. Yeah, Odoo. Exactly what every business needs. Sign up at odoo. Com. That's odoo. Com.
Park Predators: Episode Summary - "The Girls"
Release Date: May 20, 2025
Host: Delia D’Ambra
In the emotionally charged episode "The Girls," host Delia D’Ambra delves into one of Norway's most harrowing criminal cases—the tragic disappearance and subsequent murder of two young girls in the serene Vanahe recreation area of Kristiansand. Delia meticulously unpacks the investigation's twists and turns, highlighting both the resilience of the victims' families and the complexities of the judicial system.
At approximately 7:30 PM on Friday, May 19, 2000, Ustein Sosternen anxiously awaits the return of his 8-year-old daughter, Stina Sophia, and her 10-year-old friend, Lena Paulsen, who were enjoying an evening swim at Lake Number 3 in Banahaya Recreation Area. Delia narrates the father's growing concern as the girls fail to return home:
Delia D’Ambra [00:40]: "As a mother to a young child, it's one of those stories that genuinely broke my heart and is still a case I find myself thinking about in quiet moments."
Ustein's initial response is proactive; he cycles to the jetty where the girls were last seen but finds the area deserted. Despite multiple attempts to locate them, including searching neighboring parks, the girls remain missing. By 10:10 PM, Ustein officially reports them as missing, prompting a large-scale search operation involving helicopters, scent dogs, and over 100 volunteers.
The following day, efforts intensify with search crews scouring various sections of the park. Delia emphasizes the community's collective hope that the girls are lost rather than victims of foul play:
Delia D’Ambra [06:15]: "The mindset law enforcement had was genuinely that the girls had gotten lost."
However, as the search progresses without any significant findings, skepticism grows. A pivotal moment occurs when 17-year-old volunteer Annette discovers blood-soaked clothing near a stone retention wall at 4:30 PM on May 20:
Delia D’Ambra [13:45]: "Annette noticed the stuff was covered in blood, which gave her a sinking feeling."
This alarming discovery shifts the investigation from a missing persons case to a homicide investigation.
By late evening on May 20, the bodies of Lena and Stina Sophia are found concealed behind vegetation. The police quickly identify two potential suspects: Jan Helga Andersson, a 19-year-old shy and quiet teenager, and his 21-year-old friend, Viggo Christiansson, who has a history of criminal behavior including past sexual assaults.
Early interviews with Viggo and Jan Helga reveal inconsistencies in their alibis, raising suspicions but lacking concrete evidence to warrant immediate arrests. As Delia recounts:
Delia D’Ambra [25:30]: "The criminal offender profile indicated that the killer was one person... but it wasn't outside the realm of possibility that two people could have been involved."
In September 2000, forensic breakthroughs connect Jan Helga to the crime through a DNA match with a single male pubic hair found on the victims. Jan Helga confesses to the murders, implicating Viggo as the primary aggressor:
Delia D’Ambra [38:50]: "Jan Helga quickly confessed to being involved in the girls' murders, but said that he'd only killed Stina Sophia, not Lena."
Viggo vehemently denies involvement, maintaining his innocence. The ensuing trial culminates in both being convicted—Jan Helga receives a 17-year sentence, while Viggo is sentenced to 21 years based predominantly on Jan Helga's testimony.
Years into his imprisonment, Viggo's defense team uncovers critical evidence: his cell phone records during the time of the murders place him miles away from the crime scene, directly contradicting initial police assumptions. Additionally, subsequent DNA testing reinforces Viggo’s non-involvement, matching only Jan Helga's DNA to multiple murder-related samples.
After prolonged legal battles and mounting evidence questioning the validity of Jan Helga's confession, Norway's Criminal Cases Review Commission overturns Viggo's conviction in June 2021, leading to his exoneration and release:
Delia D’Ambra [55:20]: "In 2022, Viggo was formally exonerated of the Banahaya murders, and Norway's Director of Public Prosecutions publicly apologized for the office's role in wrongfully convicting him."
Despite Viggo’s exoneration, Jan Helga remains under scrutiny. In July 2024, after years of delays, the court reopens the case related to Lena’s murder. Ultimately, Jan Helga is convicted with a relatively light sentence of two additional years, a decision met with contention and further appeals, scheduled for 2025.
The murders sent shockwaves through Kristiansand, transforming the previously family-friendly reputation of the area into one marred by fear and distrust. Parents became hyper-vigilant, fearing for their children's safety. The victims' families, particularly Ada Stina Sophia's mother, channeled their grief into activism, founding the Stena Sofia Foundation to advocate for children's rights and support victims of violence.
Delia D’Ambra [58:10]: "In so many ways, I'm in awe of Ada's resilience as a parent. She and her ex-husband Ustein, as well as Lena's parents Arne and Clara, should be people you think about when you turn off this episode."
Ada's establishment of the Stena Sofia Foundation stands as a testament to turning personal tragedy into societal good. The foundation focuses on educating children, advocating for minor rights, and assisting families navigating the criminal justice system. Delia highlights the emotional significance of the foundation's cornerstone:
Delia D’Ambra [57:50]: "She told NRK that the necklace would act as a symbol for every child who hadn't made it out of a violent situation or who would never get the chance to stay at the foundation's coping center."
In support of the foundation, Audiochuck commits a $5,000 donation, underscoring the episode's dedication to honoring the victims and supporting their families.
"The Girls" episode of Park Predators serves as a poignant exploration of a dark chapter in Norway's history, emphasizing themes of justice, redemption, and the enduring strength of familial bonds. Delia D’Ambra's thoughtful storytelling not only recounts the harrowing details of the case but also honors the ongoing struggles and triumphs of those left behind.
Delia D’Ambra [00:40]: "As a mother to a young child, it's one of those stories that genuinely broke my heart and is still a case I find myself thinking about in quiet moments."
Delia D’Ambra [13:45]: "Annette noticed the stuff was covered in blood, which gave her a sinking feeling."
Delia D’Ambra [25:30]: "The criminal offender profile indicated that the killer was one person... but it wasn't outside the realm of possibility that two people could have been involved."
Delia D’Ambra [38:50]: "Jan Helga quickly confessed to being involved in the girls' murders, but said that he'd only killed Stina Sophia, not Lena."
Delia D’Ambra [55:20]: "In 2022, Viggo was formally exonerated of the Banahaya murders, and Norway's Director of Public Prosecutions publicly apologized for the office's role in wrongfully convicting him."
Delia D’Ambra [58:10]: "In so many ways, I'm in awe of Ada's resilience as a parent. She and her ex-husband Ustein, as well as Lena's parents Arne and Clara, should be people you think about when you turn off this episode."
Delia D’Ambra [57:50]: "She told NRK that the necklace would act as a symbol for every child who hadn't made it out of a violent situation or who would never get the chance to stay at the foundation's coping center."
Delia D’Ambra poignantly underscores the delicate balance between storytelling and respecting the affected families' grief. Her commitment to justice and remembrance elevates the narrative beyond mere recounting, fostering a deeper understanding of the case's profound human impact.
For more information on the Stena Sofia Foundation and to support their mission, visit parkpredators.com. Follow Park Predators on Instagram at @parkpredators.