Post Reports: How Trump’s Epstein Woes Nearly Derailed His Spending Cuts

Release Date: July 18, 2025

Hosts: Martine Powers and Elahe Izadi
Guests: Liz Goodwin (Congressional Correspondent) and Mariana Sotomayor (House of Representatives Reporter)

Introduction

In this episode of Post Reports, hosted by The Washington Post’s Cole Bjekowicz, Martine Powers, and Elahe Izadi delve into the intersection of former President Donald Trump’s entanglement with Jeffrey Epstein and its impact on recent federal spending cuts. The discussion navigates through the political tensions surrounding Epstein’s legacy, the legislative maneuvers in Congress, and the broader implications for government funding.

Trump’s Epstein Connection and Legislative Impact

The episode begins with an exploration of how the Jeffrey Epstein case became a focal point in Congress, threatening to derail a significant government spending bill. The hosts highlight the unusual persistence of the Epstein narrative in a typically fleeting news cycle.

Mariana Sotomayor explains, “[Epstein files] have been on the minds of many MAGA Republicans for years, and it’s impressive how this story has persisted” (02:59). The duo discusses the House Rules Committee’s involvement, where Democratic efforts to introduce amendments forced Republicans to confront the Epstein files, leading to intense debates and a temporary delay in passing the spending bill.

Liz Goodwin adds, “Republicans are in a tough spot because they’ve really fired people up over Epstein,” emphasizing the conspiratorial atmosphere among MAGA supporters who demand transparency and suspect governmental cover-ups.

The Wall Street Journal’s Revelatory Reporting

A pivotal moment in the episode is the discussion of a Wall Street Journal report that uncovered a letter from Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein. According to Mariana Sotomayor, the letter included Trump doodling a naked woman, which he later denied on social media platforms like Truth Social, claiming, “I never drew that” (12:08). This revelation has intensified scrutiny over Trump’s longstanding connections with Epstein and fueled further demands for transparency.

The Rescission Bill and Federal Funding Cuts

Shifting focus to the legislative side, the conversation delves into the recently passed rescission bill that aims to cut $9 billion from various federal programs. Liz Goodwin details the significant areas affected:

• Public Broadcasting: Cuts of $1 billion to NPR and PBS threaten local radio and television stations, particularly impacting rural areas reliant on these services for news and emergency information.

• USAID Programs: Billions are slashed from international democracy promotion and other USAID initiatives, with implications for global aid and diplomatic efforts.

The hosts explain that a rescission package allows Congress to claw back previously allocated funds without the stringent bipartisan support typically required in the Senate for appropriations. This maneuver has sparked controversy, with Democrats criticizing it as a bypass of the usual governmental funding process.

Constitutional Concerns and Future Implications

Mariana Sotomayor raises alarms about the potential constitutional crisis stemming from the Trump administration’s use of rescission packages. She compares it to former actions by figures like Elon Musk and Doge, who unilaterally defunded programs without legislative approval, thereby overstepping executive powers (18:04). The discussion underscores fears that continued misuse of rescissions could undermine the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches.

Liz Goodwin elaborates, “If the administration continues to send rescission packages without congressional approval, we're really entering into a constitutional crisis” (17:07). This highlights the tension between executive actions and legislative authority, raising concerns about future governmental stability and adherence to constitutional norms.

Specific Impact on Public Broadcasting

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to understanding the repercussions of cutting funds to Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and National Public Radio (NPR).

Mariana Sotomayor explains, “This is really gonna hurt the smaller affiliate stations... they work with local stations to ensure that national programming is heard in local communities” (20:24). The discussion points out that these public stations are crucial for disseminating information in rural areas, especially during emergencies, despite being perceived as liberal entities by many Republicans.

Liz Goodwin notes, “Republicans see NPR and PBS as liberal, especially NPR. There’s a lot of criticism of their coverage,” but acknowledges the essential services these stations provide to underserved communities (21:37).

Conclusion

The episode concludes with reflections on the intricate dance between political maneuvering and legislative processes. Despite attempts by Trump and his allies to appease the base by hinting at transparency regarding Epstein’s files, the underlying tensions reveal deeper fractures within the Republican Party and the broader implications for federal funding and governmental operations.

Liz Goodwin succinctly captures the predicament, stating, “They’ve been protecting Trump for 10 years. They really fall in line. They do what he tells them to do” (08:33). This loyalty juxtaposed with the demands for transparency underscores the complexity of contemporary American politics.

Notable Quotes

• Mariana Sotomayor (02:59): “When you start off the day thinking, there could be disagreements on policy, but usually not a conspiracy theory.”

• Liz Goodwin (07:17): “Republicans are in a tough spot because they’ve really fired people up over Epstein.”

• Mariana Sotomayor (17:07): “If the administration continues to send rescission packages without congressional approval, we're really entering into a constitutional crisis.”

• Liz Goodwin (08:33): “They’ve been protecting Trump for 10 years. They really fall in line. They do what he tells them to do.”

Final Thoughts

This episode of Post Reports provides an in-depth analysis of how personal scandals can intersect with high-stakes legislative actions, affecting national policy and governmental integrity. By unpacking the Trump-Epstein connection and its ripple effects on federal spending, the hosts and guests shed light on the precarious balance of power and the enduring impact of political loyalty in shaping America’s future.

For more insights and detailed reporting, subscribe to Post Reports on your preferred podcast platform.