Why MAGA faithful are growing frustrated with Trump

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Why MAGA faithful are growing frustrated with Trump"

Post Reports (The Washington Post) – December 19, 2025
Host: Colby Ekowicz
Guests: Natalie Allison (White House reporter), Dan Marika (Co-anchor, The Early Brief newsletter)

---

Overview

This episode of Post Reports delves into emerging frustrations and disappointments within Trump’s original MAGA base during his second term, exploring why previously unwavering supporters are expressing dissent. The conversation also unpacks recent events underscoring cracks in party support, including a revealing Vanity Fair interview with Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles, and controversial remarks made by Trump regarding the murder of director Rob Reiner and his wife. The roundtable examines how these rifts could impact Republican prospects in the 2026 midterms and beyond.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

Growing Frustration Among MAGA Supporters

[02:03]

• Natalie Allison shares exclusive reporting on MAGA leaders warning Trump that he’s losing his core base. Where once the base defended Trump unconditionally, “they would stand behind him… everything he’s doing is, is correct,” some now “put their heads up and say, hey, actually, I, I disagree with this.”
• Key grievances:
  • Trump’s unfulfilled promises on affordability and the economy—a concern shared by both MAGA and swing voters.
  • Unique MAGA complaints: Not enough focus on jailing COVID mandate proponents or increasing deportations.

[03:41]

• Dan Marika: Failure to deliver on sweeping 2024 campaign promises risks “an existential problem for not only Donald Trump, but for Republicans and any kind of political movement that comes after Donald Trump.”

Prominent Examples of Fracture in Support

[04:28]

• Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene: Once a MAGA stalwart, Greene criticized Trump for focusing too much on foreign affairs over domestic issues like affordability and deportations. Trump, in turn, withdrew support for Greene after her criticisms; she has since announced her resignation.
• Influential X/Twitter Personalities: MAGA-aligned figures with large followings (e.g., Mark Mitchell of Rasmussen Reports) have directly told Trump he’s not meeting base expectations. Mitchell recounted Trump’s disinterest in such critiques, preferring to talk about golfing with Lindsey Graham—a widely disliked figure among MAGA due to being seen as a “neocon.”

The Vanity Fair Interview with Susie Wiles

[07:12]

• Colby Ekowicz & Dan Marika discuss a headline-grabbing Vanity Fair profile of Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles. She described Trump as having an “alcoholics personality,” and said he operates as if “there’s nothing he can’t do.”
• She advised against pardoning some January 6th rioters and disparaged Vice President J.D. Vance as a longtime conspiracy theorist now acting out of “political expediency.”
• Notably, Wiles faced no apparent consequences for her candor, showing her outsized value and influence in the Trump administration—contrasting with Trump’s first term when leaks led to firings.

Memorable Anecdote:
[10:45]

• Trump referred to Wiles as “Susie Trump”—publicly and privately—signaling her near-family status and essential role in both campaign and administration.

Party Cracks Over Healthcare and Congressional Power

[14:28]

• Moderate Republican Rebellion: Four GOP House members sided with Democrats to force a vote extending Affordable Care Act subsidies, bypassing Speaker Mike Johnson.
• Dan Marika: This public dissent is “a huge rebuke” of party leadership and Trump, given the party’s longstanding antipathy toward Obamacare.

[16:41]

• Natalie Allison: Trump’s primary fear now is losing the House in 2026, as a Democratic majority could initiate investigations and impeachment attempts. This anxiety may force accommodation of moderate Republicans’ positions.

The Rob Reiner Controversy

[18:01]

• Trump sparked widespread backlash—across parties and within his base—after blaming director Rob Reiner’s murder on “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (TDS).
• Dan Marika: “It did lead to a huge blowback from not only Democrats, but also members of Trump’s base. Trump stood by the statement…doubled down on the comment…”
• [20:24] Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) to CNN: “President Trump should have said nothing. A wise man once said nothing. Why? Because he’s a wise man.”
• Natalie Allison: The incident broke through into mainstream awareness because of Reiner’s prominence, and, unlike many prior Trump posts, provoked open criticism from previously loyal supporters.

The Primetime Address: Trump’s Attempt to Win Back Support

[22:20]

• Trump’s national address aimed to tout achievements, particularly economic ones, and reassure supporters.
• Natalie Allison: The speech was “just under 20 minutes” and “a very fast delivery. Dizzying at times, jumping from immigration to… checks for the military.” Interrupted the ‘Survivor’ finale (a move not universally popular).
• Notable Quote – Trump [24:37]:
  • “I’m doing what no politician of either party has ever done, standing up to the special interest to dramatically reduce…prescription drugs... by as much as 400, 500 and even 600%.”
• Dan Marika: “It was essentially a rally speech…listing everything.” Tony was “insisting he had done more and achieved more...at a time when…voters are not feeling what he is saying he’s achieved.”
  [27:01]
• There is an “increasing tension” between claimed achievements and the reality perceived by both base and swing voters.

Looking Ahead: 2026 and Beyond

[27:53]

• Natalie Allison: Watching J.D. Vance and Ted Cruz maneuver for higher national prominence, teasing early moves for the 2028 Republican field.
• Dan Marika: Predicts the 2026 midterms will be a referendum on Trump and pivotal for his legacy—an “amazing test of Donald Trump’s standing with the country.”

---

Notable Quotes and Moments

• Natalie Allison [02:03]: “People who long supported Trump… have gradually begun to…say, hey, actually, I, I disagree with this.”
• Dan Marika [03:41]: “If he loses a few percentage points of people who were devoutly following, it could be an existential problem…for Republicans and any kind of political movement that comes after Donald Trump.”
• Colby Ekowicz [20:24]: “There was Republican Senator John Kennedy…‘President Trump should have said nothing. A wise man once said nothing. Why? Because he’s a wise man.’”
• Dan Marika [25:48]: “…it kind of felt like that to me. Like he wanted to get a lot in there. And he’s used to a format…where he has 90 minutes, he has a crowd that loves him… and he didn’t have any of that.”
• Natalie Allison [27:01]: “Those folks who elected him to the White House are not feeling what he is saying he’s achieved. And that’s the tension…that has really dominated this first year of the Trump presidency.”

---

Key Timestamps

• 00:31–04:28: MAGA frustrations, exclusive reporting on base dissent
• 07:12–11:31: Vanity Fair Susie Wiles interview; White House power dynamics
• 14:28–16:41: Moderate GOP rebellion over ACA; implications for party unity
• 18:01–21:45: Trump’s Rob Reiner post and rare intraparty backlash
• 22:05–25:48: Breakdown and reception of Trump’s primetime address
• 27:34–29:45: 2026 outlook, Republican field, and Trump’s legacy

---

Conclusion

The episode paints a nuanced portrait of a Trump administration under internal siege—not only from swing voters but also from its fiercest loyalists. High-profile departures, public criticisms from the MAGA base, moderate GOP resistance in Congress, and cultural missteps threaten Trump’s defining lock on Republican politics. With the 2026 midterms looming as a national referendum on his presidency, the core question remains: Can Trump reclaim the enthusiasm of his base—or will these cracks widen into existential threats for his party?

---

Transcript

[Podcast Host/Announcer]

This giving season. Don't miss a special edition of the Washington Post's Try this Podcast brought to you by the Michael J. Fox foundation for Parkinson's Research. The series explores the science and psychology of generosity and includes practical tips on how giving can benefit not only others, but ourselves. And don't miss a special segment from the Michael J. Fox foundation, which is dedicated to finding better treatments and a cure for Parkinson's. Find out about the impact the foundation is making and how you can be a part of it. Visit the Try this podcast page on washingtonpost.com or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Dan Marika]

I mean, it was essentially a rally speech where he was listing everything that he has accomplished and tried to accomplish.

[Natalie Allison]

Mental institutions and assailant asylums, the rally greatest hits.

[Dan Marika]

It was very much a rally greatest.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Hits, but I think a truncated version of a rally greatest hits.

[Dan Marika]

But the real upshot of it was that it felt like this president who was insisting he had done more and achieved more in his first year at a time when polls and conversations with voters show that, that those folks who elected him to the White House are not feeling what he is saying he's achieved.

[Colby Ekowicz]

From the newsroom of the Washington Post, this is Post Report's weekly Politics Roundtable. I'm Colby Ekowicz. It's Friday, December 19th. Today we're talking about cracks in support for President Donald Trump and what he's trying to do to repair it. Back at the table with me today is Dan Marika, co anchor of our politics newsletter, the Early Brief. And we are thrilled to be joined by by Natalie Allison, White House reporter here at the Post. Guys, thanks so much for joining me.

[Dan Marika]

Thanks for having me.

[Natalie Allison]

Great to be here.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Let's talk about these cracks in support for Trump. I don't know about you, Natalie, but this week it really felt like the frustrations or disappointments in Trump from within the party were, like, especially pronounced. And you had this amazing exclusive reporting over the weekend that there's some MAGA leaders that are kind of quietly warning Trump behind the scenes that he's losing support from his base. What did you learn?

[Natalie Allison]

Yeah, you know, this is something that we have seen sort of growing in recent weeks, some might argue recent months. But this idea that people who long supported Trump, anything he would do, anything he would say, they would stand behind him, they would defend him, they would say everything he's doing is, is correct, have gradually begun to sort of put their heads up and say, hey, actually, I, I disagree with this. And we started to see some of that this summer When Trump reluctant to release Epstein files. And we saw MAGA voices start to perk up and say, I don't agree with all of this. And it died off. And then it picked back up this fall. And so what we encapsulated in the story is this idea that not only is Donald Trump struggling to resonate with some of these swing voters, these people who were really excited to get behind him a year ago in the election, who now have sort of fallen off largely due to the economy in many cases. Now, not only are we seeing that, but we are seeing people in the MAGA base saying we also are unhappy with the job he is doing. And there's some overlap. So some of those MAGA people would say they're upset with him because he hasn't made the economy affordable like he promised to do. That's something that swing voters, median voters, average voters, normies and MAGA people have agreed on. But the MAGA people would go a step further than that and say, well, we also are really upset that Donald Trump hasn't locked people up in jail for having passed Covid mandates. You know, the kinds of things that a median voter is not concerned about. They would say, we actually don't think Donald Trump has deported enough people.

[Dan Marika]

But it really gets to the kind of campaign that Donald Trump ran in 2024. He made sweeping promises on a whole host of topics, some of which you just mentioned. And his base listened. I mean, that's really what the lesson is here is his base listened to a lot of those promises and expected him to deliver on them. You know, if he loses a few percentage points of people who were devoutly following, it could be an existential problem for not only Donald Trump, but for Republicans and any kind of political movement that comes after Donald Trump. Because one of the hallmarks of his political movement and his campaigns has been this, like, iron lock hold on the Republican base that we have seen over and over again. So that's why Natalie's reporting is so revealing, is that if that is what happens in the midterms and beyond, it could be a huge issue for Republicans.

[Natalie Allison]

You know, one of the most prominent examples of this is Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a congresswoman who recently announced she's resigning. She had been as die hard MAGA as you can get when, when Trump left office in 2021 and few Republicans were really standing with him after the January six attacks. Marjorie Taylor Greene, she was, you know, new to Congress and was just unapologetically still pro Trump. Yeah, she would show up to him at every rally, she really became a darling of maga. And she said that she understood the populist sentiment that Trump's most loyal supporters had. And those are the people who had been with him from day one. But this year, we have seen Marjorie Taylor Greene criticize him for some of the reasons we discussed, affordability. She would also say, as would some of his, his other supporters, that the President has been too focused on foreign affairs and international issues and solving wars in other countries and, and distributing aid to places like Israel instead of just focusing on Americans. Part of that, of course, would be more deportations, but that. That sort of reached a pinnacle when the President finally said he had had enough of her criticism and said he no longer supported her. Very soon after she said she was leaving office. Yeah, but we are seeing other, you know, MAGA users who, who are big on, like, the X world, who have these big followings for people who had been posting a lot of MAGA content in recent years. We're seeing criticism from those people in the story. I talk about a. A pretty MAGA gu. Mark Mitchell. He's a pollster now, the head pollster at Rasmussen Reports, which is a conservative polling outlet. And he actually was invited to come to the White House BY Vice President J.D. vance, who just got to know him from X. They were, you know, trading DMs. And the vice President was following some of his criticism of the administration. And he gets invited into the White House. He gets to sit down with Donald Trump over lunch, and he is talking to the President about what he thinks Donald Trump needs to do to win back some of these supporters that he's lost and why he's explaining to the President why some of the MAGA base doesn't, doesn't think that he's living up to his promises. And essentially, he says the President seems more interested in talking about golfing. Talking about golfing with Lindsey Graham and Brett Baer. Lindsey Graham being the Republican senator from South Carolina who really now can no longer come out on stage at Trump rallies because he gets booed. He is so widely hated by the MAGA base, seen as a neocon, seen as too much of a traditional Republican. Bret Baier, a Fox News host who sort of skews into, like, the moderate Republican side. But that also has drawn him the maga. And so Mark Mitchell's point was that the president maybe doesn't seem to totally get what kind of trouble he could be in with his base.

[Colby Ekowicz]

There was also this story in Vanity Fair this week featuring Trump's Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. And it featured her saying some pretty unflattering things about Trump and his administration. It seemed like she really kind of let her guard down with this reporter. Dan, what did Wiles say that got so much attention?

[Dan Marika]

What didn't Susie Wiles say in that interview? It was a wide ranging interview. My understanding from the reporting is it was 11. And interviews in total between the author and Susie Wiles. She described Donald Trump as having a, quote, alcoholics personality, saying he operates with a view that there's nothing he can't do. Nothing, Zero, nothing was the quote. She said she urged the president not to pardon some of the most violent January 6th rioters. She kind of threw some cold water on some of the allegations that had been made against former President Bill Clinton around the Epstein documents. And then she said some pretty seemingly unflattering things about Vice President J.D. vance, calling him a conspiracy theorist for a decade and then basically casting his evolution, which we've documented from never Trump Republican to Donald Trump's Vice president, as more or less political expediency. It's a fascinating read. It led to this super interesting dynamic between the White House obviously slamming Vanity Fair, slamming the mainstream media, but they did decide to talk to Vanity Fair. They posed for photos with Vanity Fair. They were clearly well aware that this story was going on. And it actually was instructive, I think, as to how Donald Trump has changed. I mean, I covered the first Trump term and I remember there have been moments similar to this, maybe not exactly like this, but similar to this, where someone would say something to a reporter, it would go public and that person often would be fired. Susie Wiles is so critical to the president that you didn't see that. You saw basically anyone who has ever had a cup of coffee with Susie Wiles weighing in on how important she is to Donald Trump and how much she means to the MAGA movement. And I think this Susie Wiles story really drives that home, that in a previous iteration of Donald Trump, he may have let her go for kind of speaking out of school, but she's also so important to him that he can't do that. And he may have changed since his first term.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Natalie, why is she so important to him?

[Natalie Allison]

Well, not only is she his White House chief of staff, but she is one of the architects of his winning 2024 campaign. And that is really important to Tropical. When Susie Wiles showed up early on in that campaign cycle, she was there before many other people were by Trump's side. She showed up early to run his campaign when Trump was still sort of in and coming out of that period of political exile after he left office. And so Trump has established the idea that she is a loyal person, she is an operative who knows what she's doing. Susie Wiles is someone who has not really told Trump no very much. She has said that she sees her job not to stop him from doing something, but to help him carry out what he wants to do, which is.

[Dan Marika]

Distinctly different from the first term.

[Natalie Allison]

Yeah, they were all trying to change Trump, you know, trying to rein him in, keep him from going too far. And, yeah, there's times when Susie Wiles will maybe try to put some guardrails on an idea that, that Trump is seeking to carry out. But in general, her position is not to block the idea. You know, if you've wondered maybe why there's not as much juicy, gossipy White House reporting coming out, it's, it's partly because Susie Wiles, because the people who work in the White House really respect her and they listen to her. And she has said, we're not going to do that this time, and if you want to do that, you're out. And so the White House staff has largely fallen in line to highlight her importance.

[Dan Marika]

This anecdote, I think, really gets this, this dynamic. He was on stage recently and was praising Susie Wiles and referred to her as Susie Trump, basically giving her his last name as like, an acknowledgement of, she's so important to me. She's essentially family. Wow.

[Natalie Allison]

And some people, like, online, tried to dismiss that as like, oh, maybe he misspoke and he just rolled with it. No, he actually had done that again earlier in the day at a private recept. I know some people who were there at the vice president's house. He stopped by a Christmas party that the vice President was hosting with, you know, members of the Republican National Committee and others, and he said, susie Trump there again. So he clearly had workshopped it earlier, realized he liked it, and did it again later that night at a rally.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Okay, guys, let's take a pause here because after the break, we'll discuss the fallout from Trump's reaction to the death of Hollywood director Rob Reiner. We'll be right back.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

As a listener of this podcast, you've by now no doubt heard of HelloFresh. They're the number one meal kit in America, making home cooking easier with chef crafted recipes and fresh ingredients delivered straight to your door. But here's the this fall, they're serving up even more to love. This isn't the hellofresh you remember it's bigger. After literally doubling its menu, you can now choose from 100 options each week, including new seasonal dishes and recipes from around the world. HelloFresh is now healthier too. Choose from 15 high protein recipes each week with options like grass fed ribeyes or lamb chops. HelloFresh now helps you eat greener with new veggie packed recipes that have two or more veggies per dish. Best of all, it's even tastier. Savor the season with hearty fall recipes like Classic Beef Chili or Honey Glazed Pork Tenderloin. Discover new seasonal produce each week from broccolini to Italian eggplant and more. Last time I told you I had just put in an order for the beef chili. Well it was even better than expected. Super easy to cook, as hearty as any chili I've ever had and tasted so good. Best of all, zero minute spent shopping the best way to cook just got better. Go to hellofresh.com posttenfmnow to get 10 free meals plus a free breakfast for life one per box with active subscription free meals applied as discount on first box. New subscribers only. Varies by planning. That's hellofresh.com postfm to get 10 free meals plus free breakfast for life Holiday gifting can be really stressful sometimes. Let's be honest, it's really hard to give things people will actually love. You know the beautiful timeless pieces they'll wear for years. That's why this year I'm going with quince. From Mongolian cashmere sweaters to Italian wool coats, everything is premium quality at a price that actually makes sense. Quince really does have something for everyone, like soft Mongolian cashmere sweaters for $50 that look and feel like designer pieces. Silk tops and skirts for dressing up, perfectly cut denim for everyday wear and outerwear that actually keeps you warm. Every piece is made with premium materials from ethical trusted factories and priced far below what other luxury brands charge. It's elevated, timeless and made to wear on repeat. I've told you before how much I love the cashmere sweaters. I also just got myself an Italian wool coat. It looks designer and I get compliments all the time. When I tell people the price though, they genuinely don't believe. I actually have to show them on the Quint's site. So this holiday find gifts so good you'll want to keep them with quints. Go to quints.com reports for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns now available in Canada too. That's quincee.com reports to get free shipping and 365 day returns, quince.com reports.

[Colby Ekowicz]

So while all of this is going on, there's some pushback from moderate Republicans against party leadership in Congress this week. And Dan, you've been following so closely this like, will they, won't they fight on extending aca, which is the Affordable Care act, healthcare subsidies that millions of Americans rely on. What happened this week?

[Dan Marika]

So this pressure really has been building for months, really since the end or the middle of the government shutdown, when it was clear that the shutdown was going to end and Democrats were not going to be able to get these subsidies which make health care more affordable for millions of Americans, extended. They end on December 31st at the start of the new year. What happened was a small group, four Republicans joined with Democrats to sign what is known as a discharge petition. That's a term that basically says the House has to vote on a certain bill. It's a tool used by often the party and minority to get something to the floor by going around the speaker of the House who really controls what gets to the floor of the House. It's a huge rebuke for House Speaker Mike Johnson. He has had a pretty tough year and it's ending on a tough note for him because it really does raise questions about he already had this incredibly narrow margin in the House, he's lost these four members. Does he have control of his, of his conference? But it's also a rebuke for Trump, who has pitched other ideas about health care. I mean, Republicans famously have been saying that they're going to come up with a response to Obamacare for 15 years essentially since it was passed into law.

[Natalie Allison]

Trump is still saying it.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

Yeah.

[Dan Marika]

So for these Republicans to go against the House speaker and the president by saying we want to vote on this to extend these subsidies, it highlights how tenuous the Republican majority in the House is. And it gets back at Trump, which is if he's losing support from his base, if he's losing support from independents, if the House majority is showing signs of cracking, it really does kind of make you wonder at what point does all of that collapse in on itself?

[Colby Ekowicz]

Does the White House see it that way, Natalie? Does the White House see four moderate Republicans on the Hill bucking the speaker as also a rebuke of the president?

[Natalie Allison]

Well, I think what's most important right now to Donald Trump, what he's most concerned about more, more so than and then figuring out an alternative to Obamacare is, is keeping control of the house in 2026. He is, he is terrified of the idea of Democrats taking control and opening, you know, an untold number of investigations, impeachment inquiries, et cetera. So that's a big priority to Trump. And, and that might mean that moderate Republicans are going to have to take a different position. Right now, I think a good example of this is Mike Lawler in New York who stood with Democrats on this. Lawler was someone this week who we saw tweeting, essentially calling out Trump for his post about Rob Reiner. Yeah, Mike Lawler was one of the Republicans saying, this isn't cool. We shouldn't be mocking the dead like this. And then the next day, he is getting a shout out from the President during the White House Hanukkah reception. And then, of course, he is also one of these members who bucked the party to take the stand. He felt he needed to take on healthcare. And so I think this is an example of the fact that the White House is really aware that these Republicans are in a vulnerable place. They don't wanna see a single seat lost.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Natalie, I'm glad you brought up Rob Reiner because the horrific murders of the Hollywood director and his wife, Michelle Singer Reiner would not normally be a story that we would talk about on the Politics Roundtable, but because what Trump posted about it and the reaction to it, I wanted to talk about it because I think that the President posts a lot of things, sometimes offensive things, and there's this sense that people are numb to it or they kind of shrug it off. But this one felt very different and there was a lot of anger. It just struck a nerve. People did not like what he had to say. And that was true across the spectrum, the political spectrum. Dan, what did the President say?

[Dan Marika]

Yeah, so Rob Reiner and his wife were found dead in their home on Sunday. Their son has been arrested and charged in their murder. I mean, it's a horrific, tragic story. Obviously, Rob Reiner is iconic filmmaker, really kind of set the culture of the late 80s and early 90s with his movies. And Donald Trump took Truth Social on Monday and wrote about Reiner, who is a well known Democrat, progressive, has donated Democratic causes, has been very supportive of Democratic candidates and critical of Trump. And critical of Trump, absolutely. And blamed the death on Trump. Derangement Syndrome.

[Natalie Allison]

Right.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Trump blamed Reiner's death on TDS is.

[Dan Marika]

What the President called it. And it did lead to a huge blowback from not only Democrats, but also members of Trump's base. Trump stood by the statement. He was asked about it after he posted it and really doubled down on the comment, I think essentially saying he didn't like Rob Reiner.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

Do you stand by that post?

[Donald Trump]

Well, I wasn't a fan of his at all. He was a deranged person as far as Trump is concerned. He said he liked, he knew it was false. In fact, it's the exact opposite that I was a friend of Russia, controlled by Russia. You know, it was the Russia hoax. He was one of the people behind it. I think he hurt himself in career wise, he became like a deranged person. Trump derangement syndrome. So I was not a fan of Rob Reiner at all.

[Dan Marika]

But his political movement wasn't as forgiving. I mean, you did see folks who had been with the president for years say that this was out of line. You saw members of Congress who are famous for saying that they hadn't seen the post or kind of like speed walking by reporters actually commenting and saying that it was out of line.

[Colby Ekowicz]

I did see like a few examples of people that surprised me. There was Republican Senator John Kennedy. I think he's from Louisiana. I'm gonna read what he told cnn, which was he said something like, President Trump should have said nothing. A wise man once said nothing. Why? Because he's a wise man.

[Dan Marika]

I do think you're right about something. Is often these posts by the president kind of get, you know, resonate inside a bubble of people who care about political news. But this seems to have jumped beyond that bubble because of Rob Reiner's relevance in other parts of the world, because he is such a figure in Hollywood, in media, that you saw people who may not usually care about what Trump posts on Truth Social, start to care about this and be horrified, frankly, by the fact that the President, United States made someone's death all about him.

[Natalie Allison]

I mean, it sort of felt like we were back in Trump one. It's, you know, especially with Trump being off Twitter now, a lot of his true social posts, yes, they are insults towards people. He's still talking about Rosie o'. Donnell. Like he is still firing off insults several times a week about this or that person he, he doesn't like. But a lot of those haven't been breaking through. And so, you know, this was just something that, because of what he said, because of who it was, it, you know, it, it did break through. And in a way that even I, I saw a number of conservative commentators saying they were sort of just shocked at how much it did break through.

[Dan Marika]

It's like his armor is gone, right? Like it, like if, if people have kind of broken with him on the economy and broken with him on him living up to his promises. And then you have this moment where he's crude and he does something that, yes, he's done many times before. And I think some of it's baked in with the president because people expect it from Donald Trump, given his history.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Yeah. So on the subject of Trump trying to win back some of these Americans that he's lost, he delivered this primetime address on Wednesday night. Natalie, you covered it for us. What was the thrust of it? What was the point of it?

[Natalie Allison]

You know, this, this speech came as Trump is struggling to get his poll numbers back up. And I will say they have rebounded slightly since their lowest in, in late November. But that being said, the White House still sees that he's not in a great place. He hasn't made up enough ground to where they would feel really comfortable about where Republicans stand going into the midterms. But this speech came as he's, he's struggling to, to get his, his public opinion back up, as, of course, Susie Wiles is defending herself in the face of this story coming out that, you know, a lot of people were shocked by as the president is weighing whether to go to war with Venezuela and, you know, trying to gauge what the public is going to think about that and how they can sell that message if they decide to proceed with, with more aggressive action there. And so his advisors saw this as a chance for him to try to reclaim the narrative. They saw this as a chance for him to remind people or tell people at least that he is focus, focused on the economy, that, you know, listen, maybe everything isn't perfect in this moment, but think about all these things we did this year. Think about all the deportations that we carried out that we promised to do and think about this legislation that we passed this summer that we promise is going to lead to the best tax season ever. You know, these are the things that they're predicting are going to happen come springtime. They're, they're thinking that Americans are going to start feeling better about the economy. But they saw this address as a way to just remind people, you know, there were great things we did this year and you elected us to do some of these things. What we saw in actuality was just under 20 minute speech from the president that interrupted, as I understand, the Survivor finale, which, you know, that's a bold.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Move people were very upset about.

[Natalie Allison]

Not everyone was thrilled about it. But compared to Trump's often, you know, 90 minute speeches. This was certainly a truncated version, but it was a very fast delivery. Dizzying at times, jumping from immigration to I want to see more electrical generation plants and we're gonna pick a new chairman of the Fed and checks for the military. For maybe an average viewer who is not following all of these political storylines, I do wonder just how much they were able to absorb from that.

[Donald Trump]

I'm doing what no politician of either party has ever done, standing up to the special interest to dramatically reduce of prescription drugs. I negotiated directly with the drug companies and foreign nations which were taking advantage of our country for many decades to slash prices on drugs and pharmaceuticals by as much as 400, 500 and even 600%.

[Colby Ekowicz]

I read your story and you did a great job. But it was like, how do you fit all this into. How do you summarize, like what he said in 18 minutes?

[Natalie Allison]

He had a line in there saying, we still have more to do, but, you know, boy, we've come a long way. On Thursday, the inflation numbers that came out, which were a little bit better than what anyone thought was going to be, that inflation has cooled just a bit compared to a year ago is a good sign for the President and is something that the White House is touting as you would expect them to do. And so I think, you know, the gist of what they were saying is, everyone hang in there, give us a chance. But usually these kinds of live presidential addresses are reserved for really big moments and we didn't hear a really big announcement from the President.

[Dan Marika]

I thought of it almost like a, you know, when you get a Christmas card from someone you haven't heard from all year and they include a letter and it's double sided and they want to get to a lot and update you on their life and all that they've been doing over the last year. It kind of felt like that to me. Like he wanted to get a lot in there. And he's used to a format where Natalie is very familiar, where he has 90 minutes, he has a crowd that loves him, he has applause breaks, he has, you know, just the feel of, of the crowd. And he didn't have any of that. Here he was in the White House at a podium flanked by Christmas trees, and it felt like he was speed reading the speech that they had written for him.

[Donald Trump]

The current Unaffordable Care act was created to make insurance companies rich. It was bad health care at much too high a cost. And you see that now in the steep increase in premiums being demanded by the Democrats. And they are demanding those increases. And it's their fault. It is not the Republicans fault. It's the Democrats fault.

[Dan Marika]

I mean, it was essentially a rally speech where he was listing everything that he has accomplished and tried to accomplish.

[Natalie Allison]

Mental institutions in assailant asylums. The rally greatest hits.

[Dan Marika]

It was very much a rally greatest.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Hits, but I think a truncated version of a rally greatest hits.

[Dan Marika]

But the real upshot of it was that it felt like this president who was insisting he had done more and achieved more in his first year, at a time when polls and conversations with voters show that those folks who elected him to the White House are not feeling what he is saying he's achieved. And that's the tension that has really dominated this first year of the Trump presidency. And I think it will also dominate the next year, because all of that tension will play out in the fight for the House and the Senate and the midterms.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Yeah, Dan, I'm glad you brought up next year, because.

[Dan Marika]

Let's do it.

[Colby Ekowicz]

This is our last Politics Roundtable of 2025, so I'm so thrilled that I got to spend it with the two of you. But 2026 is gonna be a huge political year. So if we were to look into our crystal ball, what are you both gonna be watching for going into next year?

[Natalie Allison]

Well, I'm always going to say I'm watching out for 2028. I'm always gonna look to, like, the next big fact.

[Colby Ekowicz]

2020 presidential election.

[Natalie Allison]

As a, a, as a close observer of J.D. vance, you know, I'm, I'm curious to see how this Republican primary continues to take shape. We're already seeing Ted Cruz start to get his elbows out a little bit. And so who else is going to try to start wedging into the, the discourse about who's going to be the, the face of the Republican Party in 2020?

[Colby Ekowicz]

Yeah. Is. Is Trump replaceable?

[Natalie Allison]

He joked with Miriam Adelson, who is a Republican mega donor at the Hanukkah Party at the White House the other day, that she could just give him another $250 million to run again. So we'll see. But I'm more interested in seeing what people like J.D. vance and Ted Cruz are doing and saying to position themselves for the next presidential primary.

[Dan Marika]

I think the midterms are going to be the biggest story of next year. I think it's somewhat obvious. I think it's going to be a test of not just where the country is politically, but it's going to be an amazing test of Donald Trump's standing with the country because as much as because Republicans will try and make these races about kind of localized issues, our politics are so nationalized right now that there's no world in which the 2026 midterms will not be a referendum on Donald Trump, and Democrats will spend hundreds of millions of dollars to make it a referendum on a president who is unpopular right now, whose agenda is not resonating with voters. So I do think you're going to see a number of questions raised in the midterms that don't just focus on control of the House and the Senate, but but kind of ask these broader existential questions about where we are as a country, where are we going politically, including 2028, and what do voters actually think about Donald Trump and his first year in office?

[Colby Ekowicz]

Guys, thank you for such a great conversation. That's it for today's episode. Natalie, Dan, thank you.

[Dan Marika]

Thanks for having us.

[Natalie Allison]

Thank you. I hear we're saying Merry Christmas again. Merry Christmas. Merry Christmas. Happy New Year, everyone.

[Colby Ekowicz]

Natalie Allison is a White House reporter for the Post. Dan Marika is the co anchor of our politics newsletter, the Early Brief. That's it for Post Reports. Thanks for listening. And if you want to watch this episode, we also taped it. It's available on the Washington Post podcast YouTube channel. We'll include a link to that in our show notes. Today's episode was produced by Sharla Freeland and Josh Carroll. It was mixed by Sean Carter and edited by Rena Flores with help from Martine Powers. Thanks also to our Politics editors. Our team also includes Ted Muldoon, Alana Gordon, Ariel Plotnick, Rennie Sternovsky, Savvy Robinson, Emma Talkhoff, Thomas Liu, Peter Bresnan, Laura Benchoff and Alahia Ezadi. I'm Colby Ekowitz. Have a great weekend.

[Podcast Host/Announcer]

This giving season, don't miss a special edition of the Washington Post's Try this Podcast, brought to you by the Michael J. Fox foundation for Parkinson's Research. The series explores the science and psychology of generosity and includes practical tips on how giving can benefit not only others, but ourselves. And don't miss a special segment from the Michael J. Fox foundation, which is dedicated to finding better treatments and a cure for Parkinson's. Find out about the impact the foundation is making and how you can be a part of it. Visit the Try this podcast page on washingtonpost.com or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Dan Marika]

Think about why you listen to podcasts. It's like having a friend who makes you think or can help you wind down right? Well, the Washington Post has a lot of people you can turn to at any hour. You can read the most important and interesting stories. We can help you cook something delicious, give you advice on a tricky friendship. Rave about a movie or book that you shouldn't miss. When you become a Washington Post subscriber, you have a companion for whatever part of your day needs it most. Get it all for just $4 every four weeks. That's for an entire year. After that, it's just $12 every four weeks. Cancel anytime. Go to washingtonpost.com subscribe that's washingtonpost.com subscribe.