
Hosted by Mark Mullen, MD · EN

In this episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, host Dr. Mark Mullen is joined by Dr. Justin Romano, a child and adolescent psychiatrist and host of the Millennial Mental Health Channel. Dr. Romano explores the burgeoning crisis of screen dependence and technology addiction, drawing parallels between cell phone use and traditional substance use disorders. The discussion highlights how addictive design, powered by algorithms and AI, hijacks the dopamine reward pathways in children’s plastic, developing brains. Dr. Romano provides a sobering look at societal consequences, from the rise of "technology a-motivation syndrome" and extreme emotional dysregulation in schools to the isolation of the "loneliest generation". Moving beyond diagnosis, the episode offers concrete family strategies, such as the "DJ Khaled approach", and a call for robust public health policies to hold tech companies accountable for the digital wellbeing of the next generation. Takeaways: Addiction by Design: Smartphones and social media apps are psychologically engineered to be as addictive as possible, utilizing dopamine hits to create dependency similar to gambling.Vulnerability of Developing Brains: Children are at higher risk because their frontal lobes are not fully developed, making it harder to resist the allure of screens and predisposing them to lifelong addiction patterns.Loneliness and Sedentary Trends: Despite being "connected," Gen Z is the loneliest generation in history, often substituting deep, in-person relationships with superficial online interactions that lead to isolation and physical inactivity.Technology A-Motivation Syndrome: Excessive screen time (often 8+ hours daily) can lead to a lack of drive for real-world hobbies, interests, or social engagement.The "DJ Khaled" Clinical Strategy: Clinicians can ally with patients by framing tech companies, not parents, as the "they" that "doesn't want you to win," helping to reduce power struggles and promote self-regulation.Parental Role Modeling: A major modulator of a child's emotional regulation is their parents' own screen use; even 45 minutes of daily screen-free family time can improve outcomes. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: SimplePractice.com/bootcamp (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Head to cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 30% off — but only for a limited time. This exclusive offer runs from May 18th through June 1st only, so don't wait. Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this provocative episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, Dr. Omar Mirza discusses the limitations and potential harms of the standard Applebaum-Grisso criteria for decisional capacity. Dr. Mirza argues that the current medicalized focus on cognitive abilities (understanding, appreciation, reasoning) can inadvertently subvert patient autonomy. The conversation traces the legal evolution of informed consent, from Schloendorff to the Nuremberg Code, and introduces radical alternative frameworks: Dr. Jacob Appell’s Values-Based Assessment and Dr. Mirza’s own "FREE WILL" model. This episode challenges clinicians to view the capacity assessment not as a benign measurement, but as a potent intervention with significant risks, advocating for a humble, approach that prioritizes the "dignity of risk" over institutional paternalism. Takeaways: Shift from Assessment to Intervention: Capacity evaluations should be reconceptualized as "challenges" or "interventions" rather than benign measurements, acknowledging their potential to damage the therapeutic alliance and cause iatrogenic harm. Values Over Cognition: The traditional cognitive model fails to account for a patient’s personal values; a Values-Based Assessment investigates discordance between a choice and a patient's longitudinal values rather than just their ability to justify the choice. The "Respectable Minority" Rule: Medicolegally, physicians may meet the standard of care by following a "respectable minority" opinion, allowing for the use of emerging, viable alternative models to the dominant Applebaum standards. Addressing Power Asymmetry: Capacity assessments often function as a "colonial act" or a "flex of power" that only exists within hospital boundaries, disproportionately impacting those with lower socioeconomic status or different cultural perspectives. The "FREE WILL" Framework: A mnemonic for clinicians to navigate the legal (Foundation, Reason, Everyone, Expectation) and clinical (Want, Investigation, Listen, Logical solution) levers of capacity.Dignity of Risk: Respecting autonomy means allowing for "unwise" or risky decisions that are consistent with a patient's identity. REFERENCES: The CL Psychiatrist: Decisional Capacity: Autonomy vs. Beneficence (Graphic Novel by Dr. Mirza): https://www.amazon.com/CL-Psychiatrist-Decisional-Capacity-Beneficence/dp/0990827763 Zürcher T, Elger B, Trachsel M. “The Notion of Free Will and Its Ethical Relevance for Decision-Making Capacity.”: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31068168/ Mirza OF, Appel JM. “Capacity Reconceptualized: From Assessment Tool to Clinical Intervention.”: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36825923/ Appelbaum PS. “Assessment of Patients’ Competence to Consent to Treatment.” PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17978292/ Perske R. “The Dignity of Risk and the Mentally Retarded.”: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5059995/ SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: SimplePractice.com/bootcamp (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this second part of a special double feature, Dr. Awais Aftab, MD, Clinical Associate Professor at Case Western Reserve University, presents a rigorous framework for the next iteration of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Dr. Aftab details six specific structural reforms for the DSM-6, beginning with a conceptual clarification of "mental disorder" to distinguish between biological dysfunction and socio-cultural atypicality. The discussion challenges the arbitrary nature of current diagnostic thresholds and the "equalizing" effect of the manual that obscures the empirical weight of different conditions. Dr. Aftab advocates for the inclusion of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) as an alternative dimensional model and calls for radical transparency regarding pharmaceutical industry ties within the APA task forces. This episode serves as a high-level roadmap for clinicians and researchers seeking a more scientifically valid and clinically honest diagnostic system. Takeaways: Conceptual Precision: The DSM must explicitly define "dysfunction" to prevent muddled debates about whether psychiatry is medicalizing normal suffering or identifying biological breakdowns.Empirical Indexing: All diagnoses should be accompanied by an indicator of their empirical validation to avoid treating disparate conditions, like schizophrenia and intermittent explosive disorder, as having equal scientific standing.Threshold Rationalization: Diagnostic cutoffs (e.g., 5 out of 9 symptoms) should be optimized based on data regarding treatment response and functional outcomes rather than historical "vibes" or consensus.Dimensional Integration: Including HiTOP in the DSM appendix would recognize robust statistical evidence that mental health problems exist on spectra (e.g., internalizing, externalizing) rather than as discrete categorical "packets".Closing Schema Gaps: The manual should shift toward dimensional descriptions to accommodate the high volume of "unspecified" patients who fall through the "holes" of current categorical schemas.Public Accountability: To maintain professional legitimacy, the APA should remove paywalls for diagnostic criteria and provide full public transparency regarding industry associations among task force members. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: SimplePractice.com/bootcamp (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Beat the Boards Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, host Dr. Mark Mullen sits down with Dr. Awais Aftab, MD, a psychiatrist and Clinical Associate Professor at Case Western Reserve University. Dr. Aftab, well-known for his "Psychiatry at the Margins" Substack and "Conversations in Critical Psychiatry" series, explores the necessity of "conceptual competence" in modern practice. The discussion delves into the "Psychiatric Psychodrama," analyzing how material inequalities fuel polarized culture wars between "repenting" and "repressing" psychiatric factions. Dr. Aftab further defines scientific pluralism, challenging the 20th-century hope for a unified, reductive biological model of mental illness. Finally, the conversation examines the "Rumpelstiltskin Effect", the therapeutic impact of the diagnostic ritual, while cautioning against the iatrogenic risks of internalized stigma and essentialist misunderstandings. Takeaways: Conceptual Competence: Clinicians must understand the underlying philosophical assumptions and vocabulary inherent in psychiatric research and diagnosis to avoid muddled practice. Psychiatric Psychodrama: Much of the field’s internal conflict is driven by material inequalities and resource scarcity, often manifesting as a "culture war" between those who pathologically condemn the field and those who minimize its failures. Scientific Pluralism: Psychiatry lacks a single, unitary scientific method; instead, it relies on a "dappled" worldview where biological, psychological, and social explanations function at different, non-reducible levels.The Rumpelstiltskin Effect: Receiving a formal diagnosis can provide immense relief by shifting a patient’s narrative from one of moral blame to a technical, medical framework. Essentialist Risks: Over-identifying with a diagnosis as a fixed, unchangeable "essence" can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies of impairment and avoidance, highlighting the need for nuanced patient communication. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: SimplePractice.com/bootcamp (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Beat the Boards Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, Dr. Mark Mullen speaks with Dr. Owen Muir, psychiatrist, entrepreneur, and Chief Medical Officer of Radial Health, about the growing role of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in psychiatric treatment.The discussion explores how TMS works as a form of noninvasive neuromodulation, using focused magnetic fields to influence neural circuits implicated in depression and other psychiatric conditions. Dr. Muir reviews the evidence supporting TMS for treatment-resistant depression, explains the FDA clearance pathway for neuromodulation devices, and discusses how stimulation parameters, coil positioning, and treatment protocols affect clinical outcomes.The conversation also addresses the broader implications of neuromodulation in psychiatry, including emerging indications, technological innovation, and how clinicians can integrate TMS into modern psychiatric practice. This episode provides a practical and conceptual overview of one of the fastest-growing treatment modalities in mental health care. Takeaways: TMS is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that uses magnetic fields to induce electrical activity in targeted cortical regions.The primary FDA-cleared indication is treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, though research continues for other conditions including OCD and PTSD.Treatment protocols depend on stimulation parameters, including frequency, location (often the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), and session scheduling.The FDA device clearance process differs from pharmaceutical approval, relying heavily on device equivalence and clinical safety data.Neuromodulation represents a growing frontier in psychiatry, complementing pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in the treatment of complex mood disorders. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: SimplePractice.com/bootcamp (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Beat the Boards Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Psychiatry Boot Camp, Dr. Mark Mullen speaks with psychiatrist and medical ethicist Dr. Mark Komrad about physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, focusing particularly on their implications for psychiatric practice. The discussion reviews the terminology, legal frameworks, and international trends surrounding assisted death, including developments in Belgium, the Netherlands, Canada, and multiple U.S. states. Dr. Komrad outlines concerns regarding capacity assessments, the expansion from terminal illness to psychiatric suffering, and the ethical tensions between autonomy and the physician’s role as healer.The episode also examines countertransference, projective identification, and the clinical dynamics that arise when treating chronically suicidal patients in jurisdictions where assisted death is permitted. Position statements from the American Medical Association and the American Psychiatric Association are reviewed, along with questions of conscientious objection Takeaways: Terminology matters. Major professional organizations continue to prefer the term “physician-assisted suicide,” reflecting ongoing ethical debate about whether these practices are distinct from suicide prevention work.Capacity assessment standards remain variable. In many jurisdictions, evaluations are left largely to physician (or provider) discretion without standardized psychiatric frameworks.Expansion beyond terminal illness is occurring internationally. Countries that initially limited eligibility to end-of-life conditions have broadened criteria to include chronic disability and, in some regions, primary psychiatric diagnoses. Borderline personality disorder and mood disorders are disproportionately represented in psychiatric assisted death cases in some European jurisdictions.Countertransference and projective identification are clinically relevant. Physicians must remain vigilant about how therapeutic fatigue and induced hopelessness can influence decision-making in chronically suicidal patients.Key professional organizations in the United States maintain opposition to physician assisted suicide. The AMA and APA have articulated clear ethical boundaries regarding the role of physicians and psychiatrists in assisted death. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: SimplePractice.com/bootcamp (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Beat the Boards Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Psychiatry Bootcamp, Dr. Mark Mullen is joined by Dr. Mark Ruffalo for an in-depth examination of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD), a construct widely discussed in academic and public discourse, but not currently recognized as a distinct DSM diagnosis.The conversation situates C-PTSD within the historical and theoretical landscape of psychiatry, tracing its origins to Judith Herman’s work and examining its proposed relationship to borderline personality disorder and classical PTSD. Dr. Ruffalo explores core questions of diagnostic validity versus reliability, drawing on foundational psychiatric theory, communication models such as the double bind, and contemporary critiques of the DSM’s proliferation of categories.Listeners will gain a framework for understanding why diagnostic labels matter, how trauma-informed care can coexist with diagnostic rigor, and the potential clinical consequences of adopting constructs without clear discriminant validity. The episode emphasizes careful formulation, treatment matching, and ethical responsibility in an era of expanding diagnostic language. Takeaways: Complex PTSD lacks consensus diagnostic criteria, raising concerns about discriminant validity when compared with borderline personality disorder and PTSD.Diagnostic reliability is not the same as validity, a central limitation of DSM-based classification systems.Borderline personality disorder encompasses heterogeneous pathways, including, but not limited to, trauma exposure.Mislabeling can lead to mismatched treatment, particularly when trauma-focused approaches obscure underlying personality pathology.Thoughtful diagnosis strengthens, rather than harms, therapeutic alliance when delivered with empathy, dimensional framing, and attention to prognosis. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: Beat the Boards Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Psychiatry Bootcamp, Dr. Mark Mullen speaks with Jesse Bogan, journalist with The Marshall Project, about a profound and often invisible failure at the intersection of psychiatry and the criminal legal system: the prolonged incarceration of individuals found incompetent to stand trial without access to timely psychiatric treatment.Using Missouri as a case study, the conversation traces how defendants with severe mental illness can spend months to years in jail awaiting competency evaluations and restoration, despite legal mandates requiring prompt assessment and care. Jesse shares detailed reporting on systemic delays, limited forensic bed capacity, underfunded community mental health services, and pilot programs that have failed to meet the clinical needs of profoundly ill patients.The episode examines ethical and constitutional implications, including potential violations of the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial, and highlights the human cost of untreated psychosis, mania, and depression in carceral settings. This discussion challenges clinicians to confront how structural failures transform jails into default psychiatric holding facilities and asks what role psychiatry must play in reform. Takeaways: Incompetency to stand trial creates legal limbo. Defendants may be jailed for years while their criminal cases are paused, awaiting psychiatric treatment that is legally required but operationally unavailable.Jails are not treatment settings. Severe mental illness often worsens during prolonged incarceration, reducing the likelihood of competency restoration and increasing morbidity and mortality.Systemic underfunding drives criminalization. Gaps in outpatient care, involuntary treatment mechanisms, and forensic infrastructure funnel untreated patients into the justice system.Competency restoration programs have limits. Jail-based and mobile models often fail for patients who are too psychotic or disorganized to engage meaningfully in treatment.This is a national problem. While Missouri is highlighted, similar backlogs and constitutional concerns exist across the United States and internationally. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: Beat the Boards Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Psychiatry Bootcamp, Dr. Mark Mullen is joined by Dr. Dinah Miller, psychiatrist, writer, and author of Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care, for a rigorous examination of civil commitment and involuntary treatment in modern psychiatry. The conversation explores the legal structures underlying involuntary hospitalization, medication over objection, and outpatient civil commitment, while highlighting the profound ethical tensions between patient autonomy, public safety, and clinical responsibility. Dr. Miller traces the historical evolution of involuntary care, examines why state systems vary so widely, and explains why outcomes data remain limited and difficult to interpret. Listeners will gain a framework for understanding the competing advocacy groups shaping policy, the real-world consequences of emergency department boarding and bed shortages, and the psychological impact involuntary care can have on patients long after discharge. The episode also addresses language, stigma, and how psychiatrists can practice humane, ethically grounded care even when coercion is unavoidable. This is a sober, thoughtful discussion of one of psychiatry’s most challenging responsibilities. Takeaways: Civil commitment is distinct from forensic commitment, yet often conflated in public discourse and policy discussions. Evidence linking involuntary treatment to improved public safety is limited, in part due to ethical and methodological constraints on research. System failures (bed shortages, ED boarding, lack of housing) amplify the harms of coercive care, even when clinically justified. Outpatient commitment models vary widely, with New York’s AOT program offering one of the most studied but resource-intensive approaches. How psychiatrists communicate, document, and set boundaries during involuntary care profoundly affects patient trust and future engagement. SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: SimplePractice.com/bootcamp (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Beat the Boards Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Cozy Earth: Start the New Year off right and give your home the luxury it deserves, and make home the best part of life. Head to http://www.cozyearth.com and use my code BOOTCAMP for up to 20% off. And if you get a Post-Purchase Survey, be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here! Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Psychiatry stands at the threshold of one of its greatest disruptions, the rise of artificial intelligence. In this episode, Dr. Mark Mullen speaks with Dr. Allen Frances, Professor Emeritus and former Chair of Psychiatry at Duke University and Chair of the DSM-IV Task Force, about the clinical, ethical, and societal implications of AI’s rapid entry into mental health care. Drawing from his recent paper in the British Journal of Psychiatry (August 2025), Dr. Frances explores how psychotherapy chatbots have already become the world’s most widely used form of therapy, often beneficial for mild distress but profoundly dangerous for severe mental illness. The discussion examines where chatbots outperform human therapists, where they fail catastrophically, and how clinicians can adapt their practices in anticipation of hybrid human-AI models. Dr. Frances also warns of broader threats, privacy loss, manipulation, and the potential use of AI for political or psychological control This conversation challenges clinicians to approach AI with both curiosity and caution, recognizing its utility while defending the irreplaceable humanity of psychiatric care. Takeaways: AI in psychiatry is no longer hypothetical. Over one billion people now engage with chatbots for therapy or companionship, exceeding all human clinicians combined. Clinical utility is bifurcated. AI can enhance care for mild distress but poses major risks for psychosis, suicidality, and eating disorders. Validation over truth. Chatbots are programmed to please users, not challenge delusions, amplifying psychosis, mania, and self-harm behaviors. Privacy and ethics lag behind innovation. Conversations with chatbots may not be confidential, raising serious HIPAA and legal concerns. Hybrid models are inevitable. Future psychiatrists must integrate AI tools safely, focus on severely ill populations, and preserve the relational aspects machines can’t replicate. References: AI Chatbots: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (Frances' column in Psychiatric Times): https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/series/ai-chatbots-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly Warning: AI Chatbots will soon dominate psychotherapy (Frances' feature in the British Journal of Psychiatry): https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/DBE883D1E089006DFD07D0E09A2D1FB3/S0007125025103802a.pdf/warning_ai_chatbots_will_soon_dominate_psychotherapy.pdf SUPPORT OUR PARTNERS: SimplePractice.com/bootcamp (Now with AI documentation! Exclusive 7 day free trial and 50% off four months) Beat the Boards Boot camp listeners now get FREE access to over 4400 exam-style questions) Go to Cozy Earth now for a Buy One Get One Free Pajama Offer from 1/25-2/8! Yes, go to cozyearth.com they are doing a BOGO pajama promo. Just use my Code: BOOTCAMPBOGO Learn more and get transcripts for EVERY episode at https://www.psychiatrybootcamp.com/ For Sales Inquiries & Ad Rates, Please Contact:Sales@Human-Content.Com Connect with HumanContent on Socials: @humancontentpods Produced by: Human Content Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices