Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey: Episode 1212 Summary

Release Date: June 30, 2025

Introduction

In Episode 1212 of Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey, hosted by Allie Beth Stuckey from the Blaze Podcast Network, Allie delves into pressing cultural and political issues from a Christian, conservative standpoint. This episode primarily focuses on two major topics: David French's apparent shift in stance on transgenderism and the recent Supreme Court decision impacting birthright citizenship. Allie also touches upon a controversial case involving a pregnant woman detained by ICE, examining its veracity and implications.

David French's Shift on Transgenderism

Allie begins the episode by addressing David French, a renowned columnist previously associated with the National Review, who has recently written for the New York Times. French, once lauded as a staunch conservative and a principled critic of Donald Trump, appears to have altered his views on transgender issues.

Key Points:

• Background on David French: Known for his unwavering conservative stance, particularly his critiques of Trump based on constitutional principles.

• Change in Stance: French now refers to individuals like Brian Riddell as "Jessica," a departure from his previous refusals to acknowledge such preferred pronouns. This shift mirrors changes seen in other conservative figures like Russell Moore.

• Allie's Critique: Allie argues that French's change undermines his credibility as a principled conservative, suggesting that he is yielding to progressive pressures rather than maintaining his commitment to biblical truth.

Notable Quote:

"David French, by calling him she is David French saying that he's nicer than God, that he knows better than God."
— Allie Beth Stuckey [17:45]

Allie emphasizes that this shift represents a deeper compromise of faith and biblical integrity, contrasting it with the steadfastness of Trump-supporting evangelicals who, despite their flaws, maintain their biblical and constitutional values.

Birthright Citizenship and the Supreme Court Decision

The episode transitions to the debate surrounding birthright citizenship in the United States, especially in light of the recent Supreme Court decision in Trump v. CASA.

Key Points:

• Supreme Court Ruling: On June 27, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, limiting federal judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions against executive orders. This decision potentially allows President Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship for children of illegal or temporary immigrants to proceed in unaffected states.

• Executive Order Details: The order seeks to restrict birthright citizenship by asserting that children born in the U.S. to parents who are unlawfully present or on temporary visas are not automatically granted citizenship, contrasting with the 14th Amendment's original intent.

• Allie's Perspective: Allie supports the decision, arguing that unrestricted birthright citizenship facilitates birth tourism and chain migration, where individuals exploit the system to secure citizenship for their children, thereby allowing extended family sponsorships. She cites examples like Miami Mamas and USA Happy Baby to illustrate the illicit operations benefiting from such policies.

Notable Quote:

"Conditions surrounding birthright citizenship in the US are completely liberal and open... Most countries don't have this, and we're going in the wrong direction."
— Allie Beth Stuckey [45:10]

• Comparative Analysis: Allie compares the U.S. to other nations, noting that only a handful of first-world countries, including Canada, uphold unconditional birthright citizenship. She highlights stricter policies in countries like France, Germany, and the UK, emphasizing that the U.S.'s approach is an anomaly.

• Political Implications: The ruling has catalyzed progressive advocacy, with organizations like CASA of Maryland filing to extend the implications of the decision to unborn children, arguing for their constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment. Allie criticizes this move as hypocritical, contending that while advocating for the unborn, progressives simultaneously undermine the original intent of citizenship laws to control immigration.

The ICE Detention Case: Fact-Checking a Viral Story

Allie addresses a widely circulated story about Iris Diana Monterosso Lemus, a pregnant woman detained by ICE who reportedly lost her baby due to alleged neglect and inadequate medical care.

Key Points:

• Nashville Banner's Report: Claims that Iris, a Guatemalan citizen, was detained in Louisiana, denied medical attention, and subsequently lost her midterm pregnancy. Representative Jaya Powell highlighted her case, amplifying the narrative of ICE's mistreatment.

• DHS's Rebuttal: The Department of Homeland Security counters these allegations, asserting that Iris received comprehensive prenatal care, including ultrasounds, dental care, and hospital admission. They also claim she was detained for prior offenses, including child abuse and is wanted for homicide in Guatemala.

• Allie's Analysis: Allie urges listeners to approach such emotionally charged stories with caution, emphasizing the importance of verifying facts before drawing conclusions. She acknowledges the need for dignity and compassion for all individuals, regardless of immigration status, but maintains that enforcing immigration laws, including deportations, is essential for maintaining the integrity of citizenship.

Notable Quote:

"I am for any dignified and kinder way that we can [deport], but if the left would like to give me some policy suggestions, then I am totally willing to hear them out."
— Allie Beth Stuckey [78:30]

Allie stresses that while mistreatment in detention centers is abhorrent if true, the competing narratives surrounding Iris's case highlight the complexities in immigration enforcement and the dangers of unverified reporting.

Conclusion

In this episode, Allie Beth Stuckey provides a critical examination of recent developments affecting conservative Christian values. She challenges perceived shifts in prominent conservative figures and defends stricter immigration policies as essential for preserving national integrity. By scrutinizing media narratives and legal decisions, Allie underscores the importance of unwavering commitment to biblical truths and constitutional principles.

End of Summary