Transcript
Commercial Narrator (0:00)
Your skin should never come second. That's why PACT makes everyday essentials from the purest organic cotton. No toxins, no harsh chemicals, just softness you can feel good in. Because wellness isn't just what you put in your body, it's what you put on it too. From the first layer to the last, getting dressed should feel like self care. Visit wearpacked.com and use code DRESSWELL for 15% off your first order. Dress yourself well. Insurance may all seem the same on the surface, but having insurance isn't the same as having State Farm. It's like getting a granola bar with a candle in it. When you wanted a three layer birthday cake, you wouldn't settle for just any dessert on your birthday. So don't settle for just any insurance. When it comes to getting the help you need, State Farm is the real deal. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.
Podcast Host (0:55)
Bada bing, Bada boo. Occam's Razor is often known as the law of Simplicity AKA the simplest answer is usually the correct one. It's supposed to be this principle in solving life's greatest problems. People have definitely oversimplified Occam's Razor to hell and back and they think it just means keep it simple. It's technically a misinterpretation, and I do find philosophy majors to be beautifully insufferable. But I can see why they get frustrated at the way that we've just turn Occam's Razor into simple. The main message of Occam's Razor is if you have two competing hypothesis that equally explain the observed data, the one with the fewer assumptions should be the one that's selected. The emphasis is on having fewer assumptions rather than just picking the simpler one. That's why it's called Occam's Razor Occam, after William of Occam, the philosopher who popularized this method and razor because you're supposed to shave away at all of the assumptions to get to the the meat, the core of the matter. I see people referencing Occam's Razor for the case of Celeste Rivas Hernandez and singer D4VD, aka David that the simplest answer is the correct one, which I tend to agree that the very circumstantial evidence so far at least the way that it's being presented by alleged sources close to the two the way that it's being presented thus far, it does not look good for David. But even if that is the case, it's not a simple answer. How are you supposed to shave away at all the different Assumptions when the entire case is just a giant ball of assumptions at this point, such as? As of right now, the police have yet to confirm a relationship between David and Celeste. So that's technically that whole thing is an assumption. There are screenshots, videos, pictures, people coming forward to allege that they were intimately connected. Some netizens believe that they might have known each other since she was 11 years old, which would have been back in 2021. That's an assumption. Then there's the assumption that there's another Celeste in David's life. I will say that this is less of an assumption, but no statements have been made by either party. And we will operate as basically everything is an assumption, aside from the handful of things that we absolutely know to be true, that there is another Celeste and people are calling her the other Celeste. Second Celeste, Decoy Celeste, Older Celeste. Netizens say that the two girls look very similar. And when you look at the pictures of just their faces, they. They don't look familiar. But there is a belief that both Celeste would often wear similar things, such as the same Gap hoodie, or at least it looks like the same Gap hoodie, the one that Celeste is pictured in her missing child poster. Both of them have been spotted wearing it, Giant oversized eyeglasses. And there are theories and speculations that David did this on purpose, that he brought in an adult Celeste, an adult woman named Celeste who could often. Who could maybe sometimes pass for the victim Celeste. So that if he is ever, quote, unquote, exposed for allegedly dating a minor, he could turn around and say, you guys have it wrong. My girlfriend is an adult woman named Celeste. They just look the same, they have similar names, but that's it. That's a theory, that's an assumption. And once you shave off all of that, there's like nothing left in the middle. There's the only core of the matter that we have so far as of Filming this is September 8th, 2025 of this year. While David is out on his world tour, still based in the US before starting European leg back in Hollywood Hills, his Tesla gets impounded. Neighbors of a residential street close to where David's manager rents a house that is most likely for David. It's $20,000 a month near that house. Neighbors report David's Tesla of just being parked all around the street for about at least three weeks. And then eventually it just stopped moving. So they had it impounded. It had Texas license plates. Nobody had reported the car missing. And then employees of the tow yard, Hollywood Tow, they call the police, because they say, hey, something funky. Fresh scent in here, like the scent of this is emanating from the trunk. The police come, and they discover a dead body in the car. The car has not been reported stolen, and David is not in Los Angeles. He is out on tour. Even how the body has been found, at least to the public, is a giant assumption. Some reports, such as the LA Times, initially stated it was just a head and a torso. Other outlets have been using the word dismembered or in pieces, but nobody can seem to agree. Is it just a head and a torso? Is the body dismembered? LAPD in the medical examiner's office have been so quiet about this entire situation. The cause of death has been deferred. They're not even outright calling this a homicide investigation, but rather a death investigation that is being handled by the LAPD Robbery and Homicide Unit.