Transcript
A (0:07)
Welcome to scrolling to death. Today's conversation takes on one of the most common and most misleading responses we hear when kids are harmed online. Blaming parents. It's a narrative that sounds practical. Parents should monitor more. Parents should know better. Parents should do more. But what if that framing isn't just incomplete? What if it's actively getting in the way of protecting kids? My guest today is Glenn Pounder, who currently serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Safeguarding Officer at Scouting America. Glenn has a 30 year international career working on some of the most difficult and complex crimes impacting children. And what he's seen directly challenges the idea that better parenting can prevent harm online. Glenn recently posted an article on LinkedIn that really struck me. He shares the stories of families who were present and engaged and doing everything parents are supposed to do, and still their children were targeted or groomed or exploited online. So today we are digging into what's really going on beneath the surface. Why parent blame persists, the hidden cost it creates for families and children, and why this isn't a parenting problem. It's a systems problem and it's a problem with predatory companies. So let's get into my conversation with Glenn Pounder. I wanted to talk to you because a mutual friend of ours sent me your article on LinkedIn and it's titled the Comfort of Blame and the Limits of Even the Best Parenting. And I thought, I have to talk to this guy because this is exactly what we need to be talking about right now. Coming off of the huge verdicts against Meta and YouTube, proving that the companies are addicting and children and enabling child exploitation. In the New Mexico case, I go back to my normal life and the first thing parents say to me is, well, where were the parents? Where were the parents? As a society, I feel like we are averse to even sharing responsibility with entities outside of the home. And I wonder what got you digging into this and speaking out on this parent blame phenomenon.
B (2:18)
I work for Scouting and we often talk about parents being a very important part of a strong triangle. So empowered and knowledgeable parents helping to protect their kids in all environments, online and offline. I think it's just rather too easy to blame parents, you know, in the most tragic cases that lost their child to suicide. What, you want to blame them for that? So, you know, I think it's an easy win to just try and blame the parents. But you know what, Nikki? If there was a certain model of car where the brakes always failed, we wouldn't be blaming the parents for putting the kids in those cars. Cars would be going to the manufacturers and saying regulations state you must have safe breaks.
A (3:01)
Right, Right. Because it doesn't seem optional to most families to keep our kids off of these things, given that everyone they know is on there and they're super left out. And it's often a requirement of a sports team to communicate on there or some other group that they're a part of. And you're right that hundreds, if no thousands of families have lost their children to some kind of online harm or social media har. And I've met a lot of them and these are really good parents and they're great humans and they would do anything to protect their children. And so I know you have a lot of similar relationships and seen a lot of that type of deadly harm. Can you tell me what struck you about some of those experiences?
