Loading summary
Ross Dunn
Running a business can be exhausting.
Scott Vanak
Building your website shouldn't be.
Ross Dunn
With wix, you can express your ideas, give direction, then leave the heavy lifting to AI. From site creation to branded content and images.
Scott Vanak
Have fun with the details, customize what.
Ross Dunn
You want the way you want, and.
Scott Vanak
Manage your whole business from a centralized.
Ross Dunn
Dashboard with expert AI tools. Build, scale and enjoy the incredible results.
Scott Vanak
You can do it all yourself on wix. Income investors face a problem traditional sources aren't keeping up. The Zvol ETF offers a potential solution. Monthly distributions from volatility premiums institutions have used for decades. Consider a different approach to generating income with zvol, available on major brokerage platforms. Consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Before investing, read the prospectus@volatilityshares.com investing involves significant risk, including potential loss of principal. Distributions are variable, not guaranteed. Foresight Funds Service, LLC is the distributor.
Ross Dunn
Hello and welcome to SEO 101 on WMR FM episode number 506. This is Ross Dunn, CEO of Step 4th Web Marketing and my co host is my company senior SEO Scott Vanak. Well, we got a really good show for you today. Tons of stuff to talk about and lots of meat, so hope you enjoy. I'll start with SEO News here. The June core update has officially completed. Wow. I know you wrote a bunch down here, so I'll let you take it away.
Scott Vanak
Yeah, so this one, it's kind of funny how they call it the June Core Update. It started what, June 30th or something like that? The last day of June. Basically it's a July core update and actually you'll see it referenced that like that in a few places where people are calling it the July Update, but Google is officially calling it June took 16 days. There are reports that people who were hurt in the March and even September 2023 core updates have seen some recovery. So that's good. There was a lot of people saying that this is one of the most volatile core updates in a long time. Not a big surprise. They've also were saying that the health industry is one of the highest hit or the hardest hit by this update, the finance industry saw slightly less fluctuation. Uh, how did you favor? Among my clients, what I'm generally seeing is some up and some down for not. And for each individual client they'll see some rankings up and some down. Nobody seems to be hit really hard as an individual, which is great. Um, but I, I didn't really see anything substantial. So that's always good in our case, but not what Happens always. But in this case it did the the usual if you're hit by it is weight but build good content. You know, we talk about it a thousand times but there are a few quotes here from a few industry experts that I felt were worth sharing. Glenn, Gabe had said the June Core update was a red hot broad core algorithm update causing a lot of volatility across verticals and countries. And that's fitting since it rolled up right before the July 4th holiday when we already see fireworks. Don't you love that Google does it right before a holiday? Always Fridays, you know, Christmas Eve, all that kind of stuff. If I book a holiday, no matter what, guarantee they're going to do something crazy the day before, it doesn't matter when it is that and I'll get.
Ross Dunn
A lot of business.
Scott Vanak
That's right. Yeah. Isn't that the truth? We always get to get big contracts whenever I go away or Ross goes away.
Ross Dunn
So everyone, Scott's planning on doing a trip soon, so please give me a call. It's just about time. I want to make sure I keep the trend.
Scott Vanak
Yeah. I'm only up for a few days but it's on Sunday so you got to get all your contracts in by tomorrow.
Ross Dunn
Oh, I'm sure you got another one coming.
Scott Vanak
Yeah, exactly. So that's fun. Marie Haynes had said, I believe the June 25 core update marks the start of some significant changes in search where Google shifts further away from using traditional ranking signals and more towards using AI to identify content. That's likely to be helpful. Seems pretty accurate to me, which is why I included obvious two.
Ross Dunn
Yeah, yeah.
Scott Vanak
And Alita Solis had said brands are also seeing visibility improvements for many of their own branded terms due to fewer shopping packs, carousels, et cetera, shown above the first position. So that's always helpful too. If you have your own branded search, you, you certainly want to rank and it sucks when you're not at the very top for that stuff. So it's over now. Although there are a lot of reports that things are still kind of crazy right now. So I don't know if there's a another update we rolled right into that isn't official yet, but we'll keep our eyes peeled and see.
Ross Dunn
Yeah, I guess you roll. We're rolling right into this next one, the Google search core because you. Oh no, nevermind. That is a different article. You could do that. Why don't you go for it?
Scott Vanak
I'm just going to do it. Ross.
Ross Dunn
Thank you.
Scott Vanak
So this is something I noticed. I just happened to Notice this? I kind of forgot about it. In our last episode we talked about how in Google Search Console the core web vital statistics were showing the number of pages being tested plummeting and it didn't make any sense. John Mueller had even said that, you know, they just changed the number of pages. They don't always scan everything. But it was happening to every single account I looked at, like every single one. Well, I checked and it is back. All, all of the drops have rebounded and Google has said it was a bug and they fixed it. So go figure. But that's good. So you should see more accurate data in the search console section there.
Ross Dunn
Good. Nice to see some changes there. Positive. A nice tie in though, because for local SEO news I wanted to just give you an update on last week's mention. That was when I discussed how the June 2025 Google update may be affecting local search impressions. So far on the same local search form thread, which is a pretty good barometer of such things because people are pretty active on there. So far no one has responded that things have improved and one person has said that they don't see any improvements yet, but they're working on older data so we'll have to see. We don't know if it hasn't improved then we have to say that it wasn't part of that update or it's just a long tail after some sort of a, I don't know, considered one of the after effects and let's just hope it clears up. We don't know what's going on there. All right. In AI news, I'll might as well take this one too. Poo.
Scott Vanak
I would say Research.
Ross Dunn
Pew Research confirms Google AI Overviews is eroding the web ecosystem. Now that was the title in a search engine journal article which was pretty good. My favorite though of I was an article I read about the same topic from Ars Technica. I think it was really good because they're also a content specific company. They're getting a lot of their business from traffic to their sites. So they take this stuff pretty personally. Anyway, you'll see what I mean in a sec. A recent study by Pew Research shows AI Overviews is reducing clicks. Now here are a few of the main bits here. It's a smaller study of 900 adults who agreed to install a browsing tracker for the month of March. The Data set contains 68,000, let's say 70,000 unique Google queries. Of the results, they found that one in five searches now have AI overviews. Only 8% of users who encountered an AI summary clicked on any links in the result, AI or otherwise. So that means only 8% of people did anything. For users who only saw standard search results, that's the search results we're used to seeing. Without AI, 15% of them clicked on a link. However, we should probably reverse that order. Only 8%, like I said, activated or did anything when there was AI summary. That's just over half or just under half of those people did anything versus what we used to have in a search, a common search result without AI. Overall, only 1% of queries displaying an AI summary resulted in a click to a noted citation. Now, most frequently those citations were for Wikipedia, YouTube and Reddit, which account collectively for about 15% of all AI sources. The study further found that nearly 66% of all searches resulted in zero clicks, far more trolling Google users are more likely to end their browsing session after seeing an AI overview. Well, we don't know for sure they saw that. They just went there and saw result and left. But that was a page with an AI overview, perhaps expecting the result that they got was true and well, no. I've seen personally quite a few that are incorrect. And that's because it's done by AI that hallucinates answers quite regularly, or at least facts within answers. Even so be very, very, very careful. Don't take them as writ. It's just not the way to go. The Ars Technical Ars Technica article ends with something rather poignant, I thought. Here's a quote. Google's use of AI is changing the way people gather information and interact with search results. The trends are bad for web publishing, but Google's profits have never been higher. Funny how that works.
Scott Vanak
Yeah, yeah.
Ross Dunn
And I have extreme pity for anyone in the web publishing industry. I just feel terribly for them. I hope they keep going and doing well. I love reading Ars Technica and a lot of these other sites, but again, I don't do it every day. I don't particularly have it as my desktop. I have to find them. They pop up in different places. So this is really important. They need to keep showing up, so I hope hopefully they do. All right, let's take a quick break. When we come back, we're going to talk a little bit open about OpenAI's LLM text fil. Welcome back to SEO 101 on WMR FM, hosted by myself, Ross Dunn, CEO of Stepforth Web Marketing, and my company senior SEO Scott Vanack. And I kind of messed up that last thing. The question this Next story is is OpenAI crawling the LLMs TXT? You're a professional web creator who needs a platform that works as hard as you do. Wix Studio is built for you whether you're a designer, developer or marketer ready to amplify your impact. Build intuitively with advanced design features and AI powered tools.
Scott Vanak
Manage your clients and projects efficiently from.
Ross Dunn
One workspace scale with dynamic systems and fully managed infrastructure.
Scott Vanak
Create exceptional websites with hyper efficiency on WIX Studio.
Ross Dunn
Did you know over 75% of small businesses don't have enough cash on hand to cover unexpected business disasters? You need Relay, an all in one banking and money management platform that will change the way you think about money. With Relay, you can open up to 20 accounts to separate your cash for things like income, payroll or operating expenses. All you need is a few minutes to sign up@relayfi.com podcast that's R E L A Y-F I.com podcast Relay is a financial technology company and is not a bank. Bank services provided by Threadbank member FDIC.
Scott Vanak
The first Podcast of the Week should be the Last Word in Tech this Week in Tech with me, Leo Laporte and the best tech journalists I can gather on short notice to talk about the latest in technology trends and news. You need to know what's happening in tech, whether it's AI, iPhones, desktop computing, Intel. We cover it all every week right here on this Week in Tech, the number one tech news podcast in the world.
Ross Dunn
Join me Won't you file? Google says it won't. All right, what's really says a lot already in the title, but tell us more.
Scott Vanak
Scott Next no So yeah, we've spoken a lot about LLMs txt in recent shows. If you missed it really simple. What LLMs txt is is it's a simple text file similar to robots TXT that guides LLMs on which content is most relevant, that sort of at its core what it is. And see our other shows or or AI overviews to learn more. Don't. Don't use AI Overviews. So over at Google Search Central Live Deep Dive event. Good old Gary over at Google and I'm calling him Gary because I always say his last name wrong every single freaking time and I can't ever get it right and I don't know why so I'm not even going to try.
Ross Dunn
Gary Ish. Ish. Are you sure?
Scott Vanak
It just seems wrong. That's probably why.
Ross Dunn
I know it does, but that's what I've been told by people who know better than me. So that's what I go by that just seems wr Sounds weird enough to be true.
Scott Vanak
I promise I'll forget it for next time and we'll do this all over again. Anyways, he says that Google does not support LLMs Txt and has no plans to do so. Google does this so sometimes they say they don't do something and then they do it, or they say they do something and then they don't do it. So you know, right now, apparently they don't and they won't. So. But this does not mean that it might not be important in the future. Ray Martinez and I'm sorry Ray, I have absolutely no idea who you are, but you're somebody important because you showed up on Search Engine land. So there we go. Ray posted a screenshot of his log files to x that shows OpenAI crawling his LLMs text file about every 15 minutes. So we know OpenAI is crawling it. Others most likely are. Also doesn't really seem to matter right now. So it appears that several LLMs are crawling that text file now. Not many are using it. John Mueller noted that no AI system is currently using llmstext file officially. Officially as far as he knows about I think it was two weeks ago, so the beginning of July or so he said that this will likely change and I do have in relation to story a little Mueller bonus. Maybe that's going to be a thing I do now. Or maybe this, maybe this will be the first and last time. I don't know. It didn't justify its own whole thing but but it's relevant to this over at Scroundtable, this is where this was found. John said that it might make sense to no index the LLMs txt file. He says using no index using no index for it the file could make sense as sites might link to it and it could otherwise become indexed, which would be weird for users. So it would be kind of weird if you did a search and it came up and you landed on that page and you didn't know anything. Like if you're not a technical person, like what is this? Would it rank like we've never seen robots Txt files rank?
Ross Dunn
I don't know. It seems like a very low chance of anything happening there, but oh well, whatever.
Scott Vanak
But maybe, maybe it's worth doing.
Ross Dunn
What would they honestly search to find that? I don't get it. But anyway.
Scott Vanak
Well, I think because the the LLMs text file isn't just directives, it can include actual content in it. So I think the idea is the content in that file. Because you have, like, snippets and things, right?
Ross Dunn
Yeah.
Scott Vanak
Anyways, that's why it's a bonus and not its whole thing.
Ross Dunn
Well, and it's a pre. Bonus to the Mueller files, which is next here.
Scott Vanak
Yeah, we got a few of them.
Ross Dunn
Yeah. So we might as well tag team this one. Google on CSS and SEO. There's a lot to share here. In a recent Search off the Record podcast, John Mueller and Martin Split spoke for about 40 minutes on CSS and SEO. Here are some of the key takeaways. First, I'll take is CSS file sizes. They note that the size of a CSS file has grown over the years, but be sure that the size does not get out of control. They noted an extreme example of a CSS file that was 78 megabytes, which is highly unusual and problematic. Yeah, I mean, so the CSS file is a cascading style sheet. It is what's used to essentially explain. Well, essentially it explains. What's the word? It. I want to use the word explain all the time. Whatever. It explains to browsers how to show content that is on a page. It's. It's like the design in a file. For those who don't know. I don't know how else to put it. Anyway, what's. What's. You take the next one.
Scott Vanak
Yeah, I would just add to Ross's there and say, like, it defines the fonts that are used, the colors, the spacings, the margins, the. The aesthetics of the site are basically defined in that file.
Ross Dunn
Yeah.
Scott Vanak
And then they apply everything.
Ross Dunn
Like the padding, the lines where images show up. I mean, it's. It's really the structural blueprint.
Scott Vanak
Let's get.
Ross Dunn
There we go.
Scott Vanak
Blueprint. Yeah. I like it.
Ross Dunn
Okay.
Scott Vanak
Yeah. So they did talk a little bit as well about CSS class names and SEO. So when you set up a class in css, you assign a name to it. They said that those class names. And this is not a big surprise for me, it might be for some of you out there. Class names have no impact on SEO. They are purely for styling and not considered visible text. Content crawlers typically parse HTML for text and strip out attributes like class names. So if you're giving a class name, you know, and trying to insert keywords into class names, you're just wasting your time. Use whatever makes the most sense and, you know, makes it easy for you to figure out what that class does. If you ever have to go back and try to fix something and you just have, like, numbered classes I've seen that before where the classes make no sense. They're almost like garbledy goop. Good luck. Yeah, really good luck with that.
Ross Dunn
So fair enough. Next is pseudo elements. CSS pseudo elements allow developers to add decorative elements like icons or small symbols before or after an element. They are not directly added to the HTML and are not picked up by Google's rendering and indexing. Old only use pseudo elements for decorative purposes, do not use them for any meaningful content.
Scott Vanak
And we got some image stuff which is fun. So decorative images such as backgrounds using which use the background dash image property within CSS do not convey essential content. Google does not index these images, which is interesting because I feel like I've probably seen examples where they do, but I've been questioning that. I need to go back and check now because I feel like I've seen that happen before, but maybe my brain is broken. I don't know. Standard HTML image tags img, which is like in the source code, should be used for all content images that are important for the site's meaning. Unless you're trying to get fancy, you're probably doing that already anyways. But there might be situations where you're trying to use css, so don't do that. CSS should really be strictly used for styling and not for content. Putting critical content within CSS hinders a search engine's understanding and accessibility for that image.
Ross Dunn
So great. And finally, tables. Using CSS to create table like layouts for tabular data is a general. In general is a misuse for actual tabular data, use HTML table elements, which is preferred. That's odd. I anyway, it allows search engines and screen readers screen readers to recognize rows and columns for better understanding and index fixing. That's kind of surprising to me. I would have thought that they were far more advanced by now that they could take a CSS table and understand that.
Scott Vanak
That surprised me too because creating tables in some content management systems is a nightmare. It's. You have to use CSS in some of them and from my perspective, I've tried to create tables using CSS and I have a really hard time with it. As a non programmer, I get it, how it works, but it's. It's tricky and doing it as HTML is so easy and I'm glad Google prefers it that way because it's the easy way to do it.
Ross Dunn
Yeah. All right, well next up here, Google says that normal SEO works to get into AI overviews. Now Gary Ish once again headed this up and really what he's Saying is to get your content and appear in an AI review, just stick to your normal SEO practices. You don't need quote geo, which is Generative Engine Optimization or LLM Optimization. Llmo. God, there's so many acronyms. Help. Anyway, this is getting ridiculous, but there's also some other great points here. And they were create. They were captured and posted by one of the Google dudes there who were I guess live blogging it or such while he was talking. So we'll start with number one here. Search is growing and Gen Z are power users. Quote, contrary to the belief that younger generations don't use traditional search. Gary revealed that Gen Z users, Those are ages 18 to 24, issue more search queries than any other age group. With over 5 trillion searches conducted globally each year, search is not only growing, but its user base is also staying young. Why don't you take the next one?
Scott Vanak
Yeah. So search is increasingly visual and interactive. The methods of searching are evolving rapidly. Google Lens has seen 65% year over year growth with over 100 billion visual searches conducted this year alone. And every one and one in every five of these has commercial intent. Furthermore, the new circle to search feature is already available on over 250 million Android devices. I can't play with that. I use an iPhone and I think. And I. And Ross hates me for it.
Ross Dunn
Laugh at you for it.
Scott Vanak
With early adopters using it for 10% of their search journeys.
Ross Dunn
I actually love that. Just to rub it in. I love that so much. It's so useful. No, actually I do. Especially doing all the ancestry I've been doing lately. And if I, If I'm uncertain of what I'm seeing, I can just circle it. I can even circle a portrait. Do you see any other versions of this? Or what do you see here? And when I'm doing research for even purchasing something for the house or actually I've been doing it even for my boat. So there's a particular part that I need. I can take a picture of it and just show it on Google Lens or go to my photo gallery where I did that and just circle it and see if there's anything. It's. It's. It's been pretty darn amazing. I gotta say, I'm surprised, actually. I wouldn't have thought that was limited. I thought that would be everywhere, even in house.
Scott Vanak
It's not quite the circle thing, but I've been using image search more often. Like the other day we were cleaning the house and we found a thing. It's like, what the heck is this thing and you don't want to throw it out because it's weird and you know, it's super important if it's weird. And I honestly can't remember what it was. So we took a picture of it, did a Google search and it told us exactly what it was. It was like, I don't know how our parents survived. You know, like before technology you'd have to go to the library and you'd have, you know, like it would take you days to figure out what this thing is and now you can do it in a second. I think we probably threw it away after that too. But it just anyways goes to show.
Ross Dunn
How much slower life was then, which is a good thing in many ways. Yeah, you could just go and you'd have to go to library, spend some time, go through things. I mean it was more labor intensive but it was less immediate gratification which just moves us onto the next thing and it becomes addictive.
Scott Vanak
Totally.
Ross Dunn
I'm fine. I'm going to skip this one and go back to it because I want to do this last one so bad. Is SEO dead? No, it's evolving. Gary humorously debunked the recurring question of SEO's demise, noting that people have claimed SEO is dying since 1997.
Scott Vanak
Since before it was SEO.
Ross Dunn
Yeah, I don't actually remember SEO when I started my business. I don't think they even called it SEO yet. I don't know. Anyway, that's when I started in 97. But anyway, he stressed that this, that the fundamental principles of SEO are more important than ever for appearing in new AI powered features. The advice remains the same, focus on creating helpful, reliable content. These new tech, unless you're in the health industry who just got nailed hard, these new technologies are creating more opportunities for creators, not eliminating them. Now what do you think of that, Scott?
Scott Vanak
Yeah, I think I mostly agree with it, I guess.
Ross Dunn
I don't know, I kind of call bs. I'm not saying that SEO is dead. I don't mean that. I just mean that they're creating more opportunities. I mean for creators, yes, but not necessarily content like text content mostly for visual content, I would say, I don't know, it just like websites. I think they're pushing us to using their systems like YouTube and these different creator platforms where more money is generated and they can put their, you know, they can have a piece of ownership of them websites alone. They're going to have a hard time succeeding, I think in this new world. I don't know, it's gonna be interesting. The last one here is AI is fundamentally reshaping the search experience. Gary describes AI overviews as one of the most significant changes to search in 20 years. There's no doubt about that. Data shows that users of AI overviews search more frequently and express greater satisfaction. He also introduced AI mode, a more powerful experience for complex queries that require advanced reasoning and multi step planning allowing users to connect deeper breathier research. That is a quote breathier or breathier I breath here sounds right. Yeah. Anyway.
Scott Vanak
More satisfaction. I don't. Yeah see this is one I don't really agree with. I mean I will say you know some searches AI overviews are just nailing it but it depends on the type of search. Like if I ask you know how many pounds to a kilogram kind of thing like basic math type questions is bang on every time. If you ask it something that could have any wiggle room, well who knows what you're going to get unless it's a hard fact obvious answer that's agreed upon by everybody you who knows.
Ross Dunn
Yeah, I guess I, I take back what I said. I I do think certainly has increased my satisfaction research from a user's point of view because I'm typically not searching anything that's your money or your life why I am at YL which is one of the areas they're very cautious with. And so when I do get an answer and it's quick, it is kind of satisfying to get the hell out of there fast. There's that but I think it's a good layer. It's a very good layer. I don't want it to replace everything because I don't think it's there yet. And when things get to that point I think we're going to be more trouble than just search if AI gets that smart. Yeah more worried about that than search.
Scott Vanak
Engines when all we have is Google. When you do a Google search and it's just, it's not even a overviews it's just AI and there are no citations and it just gives you the answer from who knows where that could happen.
Ross Dunn
I hope it doesn't but there we go.
Scott Vanak
We'll be flocking to DuckDuckGo.
Ross Dunn
Exactly. Or maybe even bingo get more of the market. We'll see.
Scott Vanak
Yeah, yeah that's true. Right.
Ross Dunn
All right, so what's next?
Scott Vanak
All right. Google search doesn't support different product pricing by state. This was a little bit interesting because I don't know that I've seen that situation with any clients ever where their pricing is different on a per state level, but I guess that could happen. So John had actually issued a short YouTube video saying that Google does not have a mechanism to handle product pricing that differs by state. So if you have a price, a product that is priced differently in California than say it is in New York state, there's no way to tell Google. So John suggests two ways to handle this one, and I don't understand this, honestly, but this is like what John said is to use the tax field to adjust the price of the product to the final amount per state. All right. Take that as you will. That's what John says. I don't know.
Ross Dunn
Oh, I see. So essentially the person would have to. Either you'd automatically find out what state they're in by geo or you'd. If that wasn't available, you'd have to have them pick which state they're in before the price changes, and then the tax would reflect that state's tax.
Scott Vanak
Okay, yeah. All right. So that's one option. The other, he says, and I kind of hate this option, is to create a separate product page for each individual state. Now, I didn't like that idea. And then I got thinking, can use hreflang for states and provinces, because I've never had to do that and I just didn't know. And apparently you can, you can, you can specify individual states. So you could have a page for California and a page for New York state with the ahreflangs referencing one another. So that would be an option if you're in a situ. Again, I've never seen this situation in real life, but if you're there, that could be the workaround. But maybe someday Google will allow you to differentiate it through structured markup or some other way. But those are your options as of today, according to John. So.
Ross Dunn
Wow. Hrflang is pretty powerful if it's done right, isn't it?
Scott Vanak
Yeah, I think it would work. I mean, it works for country level stuff. I can't see why it wouldn't for state or provincial or maybe even like county and parishes. And how else do we break up a country? I don't know all the ways a country is broken up.
Ross Dunn
Yeah, yeah. Boroughs and you name it.
Scott Vanak
Yeah.
Ross Dunn
Okay. How to handle old quote, show web pages. All right. John Mueller gives advice on what to do with show and event pages. After the date has lapsed, John was asked via Blue sky, which is a great social platform, by the way. I keep saying that because I think everyone needs to be using it more than Facebook.
Scott Vanak
Rossbot shares.
Ross Dunn
Yeah, I wish there was. No, actually I don't want to be anything to do with social shares. Thank you. Yeah, this is the question I'm going to read this verbatim and it doesn't sound like Read English anyway what to do with shows on their own URLs that have passed their performance date? These URLs are unlikely to get any traffic or minimal Do I delete or keep his response paraphrased? I see it a bit like products that are sold out or which are no longer made. For some products or shows a site might be a fantastic long term reference if the product is sufficiently unique and interesting for users long afterwards. If you're the last or only one to run a show, that's a nice reference to keep for longer. People will seek it out. For other products there might be a time limit in interest perhaps for a few months such as I went to X show last month and I liked it. Who was in it for these? Perhaps you want to give a bit of time for things to drop out of interest and then 404the pages and for yet others maybe you have a lot of things coming and going on the site. Perhaps you just 404 immediately to clean up and move on and you had a general recommendation here Scott.
Scott Vanak
Yeah, so mine and I've said this a trillion times really, but is whenever any page or event or otherwise is removed 301 redirected to a suitable replacement? Or you could serve a 404 or 410. 410 means gone. But if that page has any value at all, if it has even one inbound link pointing to it that somebody built or has a few rankings if you redirect it to the most relevant higher level page you might retain some of that value. So you could just 404 it. But why risk losing anything now? There might be situations where maybe you have events coming and going weekly and and the turnover is so quick on your site that you know, first of all it's not none of that content will be there long enough to establish these links or really any value. So why bother? And maybe the workload involved in redirecting them is just too ridiculous. So 404 is okay, or 410 might be better in some cases but I don't know if you can 301 it just retain and hang on to any little morsel of value that you really can. I don't know. That's. That's the way I look at it anyways.
Ross Dunn
I guess the Only problem is you could end up with way too many 301s.
Scott Vanak
You could. There's also something else and actually had a call with a client recently and they, they have events and they were actually asking essentially the same question, where should they redirect it to? And they, they were suggesting should they red to another similar event? And I was like, no, definitely don't do that because then you're going to end up in the long term having crazy weird redirect chains because then that event is gone and they're going to redirect it to another event and you're, you're just going to be ugly. So, you know, I would say to a top level category, something that won't likely change is probably this. But you know, is it scalable? Like maybe, but maybe not. I guess like you said, it depends on if you're talking. Maybe you have a website that's like an events calendar for Vegas or something like that, where there's just millions of events always happening. Your redirect list is going to be just crazy long. So it's probably not sensible to do that.
Ross Dunn
So no, I would like. In a lot of cases they have a central page for a specific act and then from there they can have sub pages for their different events coming up or maybe the odd one that's expired, but I would generally just expire them or, and, and just have that one page as your main page. Yeah.
Scott Vanak
Or a new page or something like that.
Ross Dunn
Yeah. And hopefully that will help. And then anyone searching for, let's say the next Sting show or whatever it might be, they can easily find that page and go, is there another one coming up? And it makes things a lot easier to manage.
Scott Vanak
I, I love how you reference Sting because it's just a good segue into your 70th birthday, which is coming up.
Ross Dunn
Right.
Scott Vanak
You're 70. Sorry, I might, might be wrong on that number.
Ross Dunn
Yeah, just a bit. Not even 50 yet. Yeah. And a last note, I want to mention that anyone out there who is currently, you know, having some issues with content these days, you know, trying to put together a content plan considering AI and all of the new strategies in place that are required to succeed. Yeah, let us know. I'm digging into this deeply these days, doing a lot of research, creating our, a brand new layout based on all of the proven tactics I've gotten from colleagues and from some private forums and et cetera, et cetera, trying to get as much information as I can. And I'm pretty excited about what we're putting together. So if you want to have a chat at the very least, book one of our free strategy calls on our website and you'll be speaking directly with me. And we can. We can chat. It's free and we'll see if we can help you out or at least gabble a bit about what you're up to and what might be possible in the future. Alrighty. Well, with that said, on behalf of myself, Ross Dunn, CEO of Stepforth Web Marketing, and my company's Senior SEO, Scott Vanik, thank you for joining us today. Remember, we have a Show Notes newsletter you can sign up for@seo101radio.com have a great week and remember to tune into future episodes, which air every week on WMR fm.
Scott Vanak
Awesome. Thank you for listening everybody.
Ross Dunn
You know where your business would be without you. Imagine where it could go with more of you. Well, with Wix you can create a website with more of your vision, your voice, your expertise. Wix gives you the freedom to truly own your brand and do it on your own with full customization and advanced AI tools that help turn your ideas into reality. Grow your business into your online brand, because without you, your business is just business as usual.
Scott Vanak
Go to wix.com Income investors face a problem Traditional sources aren't keeping up. The Zvol ETF offers a potential solution. Monthly distributions from volatility premiums institutions have used for decades. Consider a different approach to generating income with Zvol available on major brokerage platforms. Consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses before investing. Read the prospectus@volatilityshares.com investing involves significant risk, including potential loss of principal. Distributions are variable, not guaranteed. Forced side Fund Services, LLC is the distributor.
SEO 101 Episode 506: AI Overviews Eroding Web Traffic, Google's Update Volatility, and CSS for SEO
Release Date: July 24, 2025
Hosts: Ross Dunn and Scott Vanak
Platform: WMR.FM
In Episode 506 of SEO 101, hosts Ross Dunn and Scott Vanak delve into several pivotal topics affecting the search engine optimization landscape. From recent Google core updates and their impact on various industries to the evolving role of AI in search results, the episode offers actionable insights for both beginners and seasoned SEO practitioners. Additionally, the hosts explore technical aspects of CSS in relation to SEO, providing listeners with a comprehensive understanding of current trends and best practices.
[01:03] Ross Dunn: "The June core update has officially completed."
Scott Vanak elaborates on the nuances of this update, noting its initial volatility and the sectors most affected. The June Core Update, despite its name, began rolling out around June 30th, leading some to refer to it as the July Core Update. According to Scott, there has been some recovery for those impacted by previous updates in March and September 2023.
Notable Insights:
[02:10] Scott Vanak: "Nobody seems to be hit really hard as an individual, which is great."
Expert Opinions:
Ross touches upon the ongoing discussion about how the June 2025 Google update affects local search impressions. While some anecdotal evidence suggests minimal improvement, the consensus remains inconclusive.
[05:10] Ross Dunn: "We have to say that it wasn't part of that update or it's just a long tail after some sort of after effects."
A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to discussing a Pew Research study revealing that AI-generated overviews in search results are diminishing web traffic.
Key Findings:
[06:39] Scott Vanak: "Pew Research confirms Google AI Overviews are eroding the web ecosystem."
Ross’s Commentary: Ross expresses concern for the web publishing industry, emphasizing the importance of maintaining visibility despite Google's AI advancements. He references an Ars Technica article that underscores the tension between Google's profitability and the challenges faced by content creators.
[09:49] Scott Vanak: "Google's use of AI is changing the way people gather information and interact with search results."
The hosts explore the controversy surrounding OpenAI’s crawling of LLMs.txt files and Google's official position on this matter.
Key Points:
Notable Quote: Scott Vanak: "John Mueller noted that no AI system is currently using LLMs.txt file officially. [...] It might make sense to no index the LLMs.txt file" ([14:00]).
A detailed discussion on the relationship between CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) and SEO, featuring insights from John Mueller and Martin Split.
Key Topics:
CSS File Sizes: While CSS files have grown over the years, it's crucial to manage their size to avoid performance issues. An extreme example cited was a 78 MB CSS file.
[17:02] Scott Vanak: "CSS defines the fonts, colors, spacings, margins—the aesthetics of the site."
Class Names: Google does not consider CSS class names for SEO. Attempting to insert keywords into class names is ineffective.
[17:25] Scott Vanak: "Use whatever makes the most sense and makes it easy for you to figure out what that class does."
Pseudo Elements: These should solely be used for decorative purposes and not contain meaningful content, as Google does not index them.
Images in CSS:
background-image for non-essential visuals does not convey content to Google.<img> tags to ensure proper indexing.[19:36] Ross Dunn: "Putting critical content within CSS hinders a search engine's understanding and accessibility for that image."
Tables: For tabular data, use HTML table elements instead of CSS-created tables to ensure better accessibility and indexing by search engines.
[20:36] Scott Vanak: "Creating tables in some CMSs is a nightmare with CSS, so using HTML is preferred."
Conclusion: Proper use of CSS is vital for maintaining both website aesthetics and SEO performance. Misuse can lead to poor indexing and reduced visibility.
Addressing the recurring question, "Is SEO dead?" the hosts emphasize that SEO is not only alive but evolving in response to AI advancements.
[24:05] Ross Dunn: "Is SEO dead? No, it's evolving."
Key Takeaways:
Fundamental Principles: The core tenets of SEO—creating helpful and reliable content—remain crucial for appearing in AI-powered search features.
Opportunities for Creators: Despite challenges, new technologies are creating avenues for content creators to enhance their reach and engagement.
[24:23] Scott Vanak: "The fundamental principles of SEO are more important than ever for appearing in new AI-powered features."
Ross expresses skepticism about the sustainability of traditional SEO practices in a landscape increasingly dominated by AI, suggesting that while opportunities exist, the playing field is shifting.
Gary Ish highlights the transformative impact of AI on search, detailing how it alters user behavior and expectations.
Highlights:
Growth in Search Usage: Gen Z remains the most active searchers, countering the belief that younger generations prefer alternative information sources.
[21:52] Gary Ish: "Gen Z users issue more search queries than any other age group."
Visual and Interactive Search: Tools like Google Lens are experiencing significant growth, with 65% year-over-year increase and over 100 billion visual searches conducted annually.
[22:30] Scott Vanak: "I took a picture of it and just showed it on Google Lens—it was amazing."
AI Mode for Complex Queries: Introduced to handle multi-step reasoning and in-depth research needs, enhancing the search experience for more intricate queries.
[26:30] Gary Ish: "AI overviews are one of the most significant changes to search in 20 years."
Discussion: While AI enhances user satisfaction for straightforward queries, Ross and Scott acknowledge potential drawbacks, such as the limitations of AI-generated answers in nuanced searches and the risk of misinformation.
Addressing the challenge of displaying different product prices based on the user’s state, the hosts relay John Mueller’s advice.
Solutions Provided:
Using the Tax Field: Adjust the product price dynamically by incorporating state-specific taxes, ensuring the final amount reflects regional pricing.
[29:01] Scott Vanak: "Alternatively, you might have users select their state before the price changes."
Separate Product Pages: Create individual pages for each state using hreflang tags to specify regional variations.
[30:16] Scott Vanak: "You could have a page for California and a page for New York with hreflang referencing one another."
Considerations:
hreflang is essential to avoid duplicate content issues and ensure search engines correctly index regional pages.The final segment covers strategies for handling URLs dedicated to past events, ensuring minimal negative impact on SEO.
John Mueller’s Recommendations:
[32:13] Scott Vanak: "If the page has any value, redirect it to a suitable replacement to retain any SEO value."
Ross’s Input: Ross suggests centralizing event information on main category pages to streamline management and improve user navigation.
Ross and Scott wrap up the episode by inviting listeners facing challenges in adapting their SEO strategies amidst AI advancements to reach out for free strategy calls. They emphasize their ongoing efforts to stay updated with the latest SEO trends and provide tailored solutions to their audience.
[35:08] Ross Dunn: "If you want to have a chat at the very least, book one of our free strategy calls on our website."
Listeners are encouraged to subscribe to the Show Notes newsletter at seo101radio.com for more insights and updates.
Post-Episode Advertisement Skipped
Note: Advertisements, intros, outros, and non-content sections have been omitted to focus solely on the informative segments of the podcast.
By integrating these insights, listeners can better navigate the ever-changing SEO landscape, leveraging both traditional strategies and emerging technologies to enhance their online presence.