The Mystery Of Inner Monologues

Summary

Short Wave — "The Mystery Of Inner Monologues" (November 19, 2025)

Episode Overview

In this episode of Short Wave, hosts Emily Kwong and Rachel Carlson dive into the science and lived experience behind inner monologues—those streams of verbal thought that play (or, for some, don't play) in people's heads. Prompted by Emily's revelation that she doesn't have an inner monologue, the hosts investigate how common this is, how inner speech develops, what brain science reveals, and why the diversity of inner experiences matters. Psychologists Russell Hurlburt (University of Nevada) and Charles Ferniho (Durham University) join to explain the history, methods, and neural basis of inner speech, as well as the relationship between inner monologue, voice hearing, and mental health.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Not Everyone Has an Inner Monologue

• Emily’s Confession: Emily reveals she doesn't have an inner monologue, instead experiencing her thoughts as images and feelings.
  • "My inner experience isn't really word based. It's more like a moving landscape of images. It's kind of like soaking in an emotional bath."
    — Emily Kwong (01:14)
• Variety of Experiences: Rachel, in contrast, has a "loud," dialogue-heavy inner monologue, often imagining conversations or scripts playing out in her mind.
  • "Mine is loud. Oh no, it does not feel like a bath. It feels like it's dialogue heavy... It's a screenplay."
    — Rachel Carlson (01:34)
• Listener Curiosity: Audience emails express disbelief and curiosity (“Is that even a thing?”). The hosts confirm that science backs up this diversity.

2. Studying Inner Experience: Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES)

• Introducing Russell Hurlburt: Pioneering psychologist who sought to study inner experience.
  • "People didn’t know what they were talking about when they picked a number on a Likert scale... The data was just rotten on the way in."
    — Russell Hurlburt (02:35)
• The Beeper Study: Instead of surveys, Hurlburt used a “beeper” method, prompting people to jot down what was happening in their minds at random moments. This descriptive approach proved more revealing but still had limitations.
• Limits of Self-Report:
  • "You've got no good reason to be confident that you do or do not have an inner monologue because there's just too many layers between what your inner experience actually is and what you might say about it."
    — Russell Hurlburt (03:18)

3. The Science of Inner Speech

• Charles Ferniho’s Research: Ferniho studies how inner speech develops and its neural underpinnings.
  • "We've shown you can do it... you can have a science of it."
    — Charles Ferniho (03:49)
• Origins in Childhood: Inner speech develops from "private speech"—children talking to themselves as they learn, which gradually internalizes.
  • "When kids are talking to themselves out loud, we call that private speech. And the idea is that it's the precursor... So the inner speech that you and I probably experience... comes from developmentally from private speech."
    — Charles Ferniho (05:43)
  • This idea originated with Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky.

4. What’s Happening in the Brain?

• Language Areas: Key language regions—Broca’s area (frontal, speech production) and Wernicke’s area (temporal, speech comprehension)—are both involved.
  • "Those two areas create a kind of resonating loop which always shows up when we ask people to speak to themselves or out loud in the scanner."
    — Charles Ferniho (07:02)
• More Than Language: Inner speech, especially dialogic forms (imagined conversations), involves additional brain regions—like those used in representing other people’s minds.

5. Scanning the Inner Voice: Elicited vs. Spontaneous Inner Speech

• Experimental Findings: Using both DES and fMRI, Ferniho and Hurlburt found that "elicited" (prompted) inner speech and naturally occurring ("spontaneous") inner speech activate the brain differently.
  • "When we had elicited inner speech, there was lots of that Broca’s area... But when people were doing inner speech spontaneously, there was much less of time... more of that region a bit further back, the Wernicke’s area."
    — Charles Ferniho (09:21-10:23)
• Caution for Neuroscientists:
  • "We shouldn’t assume that when you put somebody in the scanner and tell them to do something, the thing that results is anything like the thing you’re actually interested in."
    — Charles Ferniho (10:28)

6. Voice Hearing: Science and Stigma

• What Is Voice Hearing? Experiencing a voice with no external source, often associated with mental illness but found in many healthy individuals too.
  • "What we've learned is that this experience happens to all sorts of people in all sorts of walks of life... There are a significant number of people who hear voices, who are not distressed by them... find them useful, creative, guiding."
    — Charles Ferniho (11:21)
• Neuroscientific Theory: Voice hearing may result from inner speech being misattributed to an external source when a brain signal (from Broca’s to Wernicke’s) fails to indicate ‘it’s just you.’
  • "Usually when you're speaking, that bit at the front sends a little internal message... In the case of voice hearing, that message doesn't get through."
    — Charles Ferniho (13:09)

7. Diversity of Inner Worlds & Mental Health

• Some People Have None: The researchers stress that some people almost never use inner speech but have rich mental imagery, music, or emotions.
• Should We Cultivate Inner Speech? Ferniho emphasizes celebrating the diversity of minds, rather than suggesting everyone should have or develop inner speech.
  • "I'd like to celebrate the diversity of human minds. I think we are so different... I wouldn't ever want to set out and say to people that they should improve their inner speech..."
    — Charles Ferniho (13:52)
  • "Sometimes inner speech can have a negative side... If that's bothering you, there are maybe things that you can do to rethink it."
    — Charles Ferniho (14:14)
• Resources: Ferniho recommends understandingvoices.com for more on voice hearing.

---

Notable Quotes & Moments with Timestamps

• Emily on her non-verbal inner world:
  • "It's kind of like soaking in an emotional bath." (01:14)
• Rachel on her verbal mind:
  • "Mine is loud... Dialogue heavy... It's a screenplay." (01:34)
• Russell Hurlburt’s humility:
  • "You’ve got no good reason to be confident that you do or do not have an inner monologue..." (03:18)
• Charles Ferniho on Vygotsky & development:
  • "That is the theory of a great Russian psychologist called Lev Vygotsky..." (06:35)
• Caution about brain studies:
  • "We shouldn’t assume that when you put somebody in the scanner... the thing that results is anything like the thing you’re actually interested in." (10:28)
• Diversity celebration:
  • "I think it's wonderful that there is this diversity and we can celebrate that diversity." (13:59)

---

Key Timestamps

• 00:34–01:32: Emily reveals she lacks an inner monologue; audience intrigue.
• 02:03–03:35: Origins of inner monologue research; limits of surveys and self-knowledge.
• 05:20–06:20: How inner speech arises from childhood private speech (Vygotsky).
• 07:02–08:24: Brain areas involved in inner speech (Broca’s, Wernicke’s, and beyond).
• 09:13–10:55: How imaging studies complicated (and sometimes clarified) our understanding.
• 11:09–13:15: The science and experience of "voice hearing" and its misunderstood diversity.
• 13:52–14:51: On the value of inner diversity and healthy approaches to inner speech.

---

Conclusion

The episode highlights the complexity and diversity of human inner life, dismantling the myth that everyone hears an inner voice. Science is only beginning to map what we experience inside, and, as Ferniho stresses, the real takeaway is to celebrate the many forms our minds can take—whether filled with dialogue, images, music, or silence. If your inner monologue is distressing (or missing), you're simply part of the grand variety of the human mind. For more, Ferniho recommends understandingvoices.com.

---

For Listeners:

Skip to:

• 01:14 for Emily's inner "bath"
• 02:03 for the history of inner experience studies
• 05:30 for how children develop inner monologue
• 09:13 for brain imaging findings
• 11:09 for the connection to voice hearing
• 13:52 for why not having (or having!) an inner monologue is just one way to be human

Short Wave makes complex neuroscience and psychology not just accessible, but warmly human.

Transcript

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

Support for npr. And the following message come from freshworks, who believes complexity is the enemy of efficiency. Stop wrestling with bloated, expensive software, uncomplicate with Fresh service for it and Freshdesk for customer support.

[Emily Kwong]

Learn [e-mail] you're listening to Shortwave from NPR. Hey, Shortwavers, it's Emily Kwong and Rachel Carlson, shortwave producer.

[Rachel Carlson]

And Emily, I think it's pretty safe to say that both of us read the team inbox shortwavenpr.org, every morning.

[Emily Kwong]

Fervently.

[Rachel Carlson]

Exactly. And two months ago, you said something to reporter John Hamilton that really piqued our audience's interest.

[Emily Kwong]

I don't have an inner monologue.

[Charles Ferniho]

Not everybody has an inner monologue. This is, this is something that doesn't work for everybody.

[Rachel Carlson]

I'm safe.

[Charles Ferniho]

Yeah, exactly.

[Emily Kwong]

But if I'm so proud of myself.

[Rachel Carlson]

And our inbox lit up about this. People wrote, is that even a thing? I don't understand. How is that possible? So we had to confirm. Science backs this up, right? Not everyone has an inner monologue.

[Emily Kwong]

It is true. Scientists confirm for some people, inner speech is far less wordy. So my inner experience isn't really word based. It's more like a moving landscape of images. It's kind of like soaking in an emotional bath. And like feelings.

[Rachel Carlson]

I love it.

[Emily Kwong]

Yeah. And feelings and images will rise and they'll fall, but there's no words.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

It's.

[Emily Kwong]

It's real silent.

[Rachel Carlson]

Mine is loud. Oh, no, it does not feel like a bath. It feels like it's dialogue heavy. So whether it's a conversation that I'm having with myself or an imagined conversation with other people. Yeah, it's a screenplay.

[Emily Kwong]

Me, myself and my voice.

[Rachel Carlson]

Yeah, totally.

[Emily Kwong]

La la la la.

[Rachel Carlson]

But, Emily, this got us thinking. The insides of people's heads are. And it turns out there are scientists who study what's going on in people's minds.

[Russell Hurlburt]

I think it's the most interesting question on the planet. The earliest known writings, like Gilgamesh or whatever you call the earliest writings, are interested in inner experience.

[Emily Kwong]

This is Russell Hurlburt, a psychologist at the University of Nevada. And Russ is a legend in the field for being one of the first to gather data on inner experiences through a beeper.

[Rachel Carlson]

Participants carried this device around, and every time it beeped, they filled out a questionnaire to quantify their inner experience. But there was a problem.

[Russell Hurlburt]

People didn't know what they were talking about when they. When they picked a number on a Likert scale. And I didn't know what they were talking about. The data was just rotten on the way in.

[Emily Kwong]

So he ditched the questionnaires and instead told participants, every time the beeper goes off, write down what's going on internally. It's your own words.

[Russell Hurlburt]

And then we get together and talk about it.

[Emily Kwong]

Russ called this technique descriptive experience sampling. It was illuminating, sometimes even life changing for the participants involved. But Russ is the first to say how highly imperfect his method is.

[Rachel Carlson]

It's just people saying what's going on in their heads. But how do you confirm?

[Emily Kwong]

Yeah, like, how do you check for accuracy? Like, he believes that people do not fully know the characteristics of their inner experience, including me.

[Russell Hurlburt]

You've got no good reason to be confident that you do or do not have an inner monologue because there's just too many layers between what your inner experience actually is and what you might say about it.

[Emily Kwong]

That was humbling to hear.

[Rachel Carlson]

It's humbling, yes. But Emily, you know, even if people can't fully know themselves, scientists are still trying to figure it out, including a collaborator of Russell's, Charles Ferniho.

[Charles Ferniho]

We've shown you can do it. Not just us. Teams all around the world have shown you can study the stuff. You can have a science of it.

[Emily Kwong]

So today on the show, how far can the science go in the quest to know thyself? I'm Emily Kwong.

[Rachel Carlson]

And I'm Rachel Carlson. You're listening to Short Wave, the science podcast from NPR.

[Charles Ferniho]

Foreign.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

This message comes from at&t. America's first network is also its fastest and most Reliable based on RootMetrics United States Root Score Report 1H 2025 tested with best commercially available smartphones on three national mobile networks across all available network types. Your experiences may vary. RootMetrics rankings are not an endorsement of AT&T. When you compare, there's no comparison. AT&T.

This message comes from Dell Technologies. It's time for Black Friday. Dell Technologies biggest sale of the year for gift worthy accessories and select PCs like the Dell 16 plus featuring Intel Core Ultra processors. Shop [e-mail] deals this message comes from Capital One.

Say hello to stress free subscription management. Easily track block or cancel recurring charges right from the Capital One Mobile. Simple as that. Learn [e-mail] Subscriptions Terms and Conditions apply.

[Emily Kwong]

Okay, short wavers, Rachel and I are here with Charles Ferniho. He's a professor of psychology at Durham University and studies inner speech, which is one of many kinds of internal experiences.

[Rachel Carlson]

Charles, what do we know about where inner speech comes from and what parts of the brain are involved.

[Charles Ferniho]

Well, if you watch any small child, you're really likely to see them talking to themselves.

[Rachel Carlson]

Yes.

[Charles Ferniho]

So when kids are talking to themselves out loud, we call that private speech. And the idea is that it's the precursor. It's the thing that comes before inner speech. So the inner speech that you and I probably experience, or may not, where that comes from developmentally is from private speech. And in turn, that private speech came from the social dialogues that kid enjoyed when they were growing up. So talking to caregivers, other adults, other children, and gradually internalizing those conversations, they become conversations with the self.

[Rachel Carlson]

Wow.

[Emily Kwong]

You're saying basically, like, because we're born into this social world with all these people around, like, my niece's little monologue when she's, like, talking to herself, will eventually become internalized, and that is her inner speech.

[Charles Ferniho]

Yeah, exactly. That is the. It's the theory of a great Russian psychologist called Lev Vygotsky, who was writing this stuff about 100 years ago. His work has become increasingly influential in recent years. And it's a really simple, neat little theory that nobody's got to the bottom of yet because it is so rich. It has such implications for the way our minds work.

[Rachel Carlson]

Where is that in the brain or where can we see it in the brain?

[Charles Ferniho]

Well, as you'd expect, you see the language systems that we know about mostly lateralized onto the left hemisphere, a bit towards the front, called Broca's area, which is often involved in producing, you know, complex action patterns. A bit further back, called Wernicke's area, which is responsible for processing speech, including speech from other people. Those two areas create a kind of resonating loop which always shows up when we ask people to speak to themselves or out loud in the scanner.

[Emily Kwong]

What kind of scanner? Like a CT scanner, an MRI scanner.

[Charles Ferniho]

These days it's going to be an MRI scanner. Yeah. When we're doing FMRI research on the topic, so we see those systems lighting up, but, I mean, that bit at the front, Broca's area lights up when we do a whole load of different things. So we can't really pin too much onto that. So we know it's important, but it's not the whole story.

[Rachel Carlson]

How so?

[Charles Ferniho]

So one of the things that we've argued, you know, if inner speech comes from a dialogue with other people, it should have the structure of a dialogue. In order to do that, your language system has got to be working. All that stuff on the left hemisphere that you'd expect to be working, but some other stuff must be Going on as well.

[Rachel Carlson]

Oh, interesting. Okay, so you're saying that would involve more parts of the brain than just the language areas?

[Charles Ferniho]

Yeah. And what we find when we look at people doing dialogic in a speech, as opposed to something that's more like a single line of conversation, is that, yes, you get that language system in the left hemisphere firing, but you also get another region way on the other side of the brain, which we know from previous research is involved in representing other people's minds. So you're representing yourself as a partner in that conversation.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

Wow.

[Charles Ferniho]

Wow.

[Emily Kwong]

We heard from Russell Hurlburt how there's, like, limits to surveying. Like, you can't really know what's going on in someone's inner experience fully, nor can they. How is the. The addition of scanning deepened our understanding of inner speech or complicated it to the point where maybe there's even more that we don't know?

[Charles Ferniho]

The cool thing about working with Russ was that we had a study where we got people used to using descriptive experience sampling.

[Emily Kwong]

The beeper.

[Charles Ferniho]

Yeah, the beeper. Yeah, they got used to using the beeper. Once they got pretty good at it, we then put them into the scanner and we saw what they were doing. So we had two kinds of inner speech. We sort of caught two kinds of fish. One is the elicited inner speech, where you're told to do it, and the other is the spontaneous inner speech where you're not told to do it. It just happens. And we could look to see whether these two kinds of things were the same. And we've got a whole lot further to do on this topic. But what we found is they didn't look the same in terms of that balance of activation between Broca's area and Wernicke's area. So when we had elicited in a speech, there was lots of that Broca's area, the bit at the front on the left, that's producing, producing, you know, doing these high, complex movement patterns, including speech. But when people were doing inner speech spontaneously, there was much less of time.

[Emily Kwong]

Just like chilling in the machine, and they just had an errant thought that was inner speech.

[Charles Ferniho]

Exactly. And it was more of that. That region bit further back, the Wernicard's area.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

Wow.

[Charles Ferniho]

That was more the kind of listening heary bit of the brain listening. Yeah. You know, that the exact areas of the brain doesn't matter too much. But for us, it was a really important sign that more needed to be done here and that we shouldn't assume that when you put somebody in the scanner and tell them to do something. The thing that results is anything like the thing you're actually interested in. So neuroscientists beware. Are people really doing the kind of thing in the scanner that you want them to be doing?

[Rachel Carlson]

Yeah. Yeah.

[Emily Kwong]

I mean, that kind of inner speech, like spontaneous inner speech, sounds like birding. You scientists have to patiently wait and see if a bird shows up, but.

[Rachel Carlson]

The bird is your own brain.

[Charles Ferniho]

I love it. Yeah, exactly.

[Rachel Carlson]

I mean. Okay, so you also lead this project on voice hearing. So can you just tell us what voice hearing is and how it differs from spontaneous inner speech?

[Charles Ferniho]

So we use the term voice hearing to describe the experience of hearing a voice when there's nobody around to have produced that voice. And we usually associate it with severe mental illness. So diagnoses like schizophrenia. What we've learned is that this experience happens to all sorts of people in all sorts of walks of life. Many, if not most, psychiatric disorders have voice hearing associated with them. But then there are a significant number of people who hear voices, who are not distressed by them, who don't seek psychiatric help, who don't need psychiatric help because they're not distressed, but find them useful, Creative, guiding, spiritual, all these kinds of things. So the question of how that relates to inner speech. The theory is that when somebody hears a voice, what's actually happening is that they're producing some inner speech. So they're talking to themselves. But for some reason, that is not experienced as their own voice. It's experienced as coming from some sort of other entity or some sort of other place. And there's a good neuroscientific theory of why that works. And it goes back to those two parts of the brain. In fact, that bit Broca at the front, that bit Wernicke a bit further back. The idea is that when. Usually when you're speaking, that bit at the front sends a little internal message to that bit in the middle and says you're about to speak. Don't pay too much attention to it. Don't kind of process this like you'd process somebody else speaking, because it's just you. And the idea is that in the case of voice hearing, that message doesn't get through in the same way. It's delayed or it's degraded, or it doesn't happen at all. Wow.

[Emily Kwong]

So your brain can't tell it's you who's talking?

[Charles Ferniho]

Yeah, pretty much, yeah.

[Rachel Carlson]

What's the difference between that and not having inner speech?

[Charles Ferniho]

The work that Russ has done and the work that I'VE done with him has made it really obvious to me that some people don't use inner speech very much. Maybe some never use it at all. They do other things. Yeah.

[Emily Kwong]

Yeah.

[Charles Ferniho]

They use images, they use music, they use emotions. They use all the other stuff that's going on in your head. Mm. It's also made it obvious to me that we're really bad at judging what's going on in our heads.

[Emily Kwong]

But if. If speech is just a tool, do you think that an adult can develop their inner speech? Like, is it. Is it better to have one?

[Charles Ferniho]

I'd like to celebrate the diversity of human minds. I think we are so different.

[Rachel Carlson]

I think that's beautiful.

[Charles Ferniho]

I think it's wonderful that there is this diversity and we can celebrate that diversity. I wouldn't ever want to set out and say to people that they should improve their inner speech, but what I would say is that sometimes inner speech can have a negative side. And if your inner speech is bothering you, if it's excessively critical, you know, it can be wrapped up in all kinds of stuff that isn't particularly good for your mental health. And I'd say if. If that's bothering you, there are maybe things that you can do to. To rethink it. And if people have any concerns or want to know more about hearing voices, we have a website called understandingvoices.com where you'll find a whole bunch of different kinds of information about voice hearing, including how people make sense of voice hearing, what people do to seek help for voice hearing, and so on.

[Emily Kwong]

Charles Fernio, thank you so much for coming on Short Wave to talk about this. I think Rachel and I are a little speechless.

[Rachel Carlson]

I'm speechless.

[Charles Ferniho]

Yeah. Thank you both.

[Emily Kwong]

This episode was produced by none other than Rachel Carlson. She really does it all.

[Rachel Carlson]

Thank you. It was edited by our showrunner, Rebecca Ramirez, and fact checked by Tyler Jones.

[Emily Kwong]

Kwesi Lee was the audio engineer, and Beth Donovan is our vice president of podcasting. I'm Emily Kwong.

[Rachel Carlson]

And I'm Rachel Carlson.

[Emily Kwong]

Thanks for listening to Short Wave from npr.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

This message comes from Warby Parker. Prescription eyewear that's expertly crafted and unexpectedly affordable. Glasses designed in house from premium material starting at just $95, including prescription lenses. Stop by a Warby Parker store near you.

This message comes from Pakka. Everyone's got that one hoodie they practically live in. But the Pakka hoodie, it's on another level. Softer than cashmere, warmer than wool, and still breathable. This alpaca fiber hoodie goes from airport to mountain trail to couch without missing a beat. Right now, grab a Pakka hoodie and score a free pair of Alpaca crew socks. Moisture wicking, odor resistant and guaranteed for life. Level up your hoodie [e-mail] NPR Code.

NPR this message comes from Bombas. Treat your feet right this season with merino wool, cashmere, long staple cotton and more premium materials. Better basics. Visit bombas.com NPR and use code NPR for 20% off your first order.