
Why did so many people stand with Richard Nixon for so long?
Loading summary
Rakuten Advertiser
Shop with Rakuten and you'll get it. What's it? It's the real deal. Cash back and savings on almost everything you buy. Join Rakuten and start getting cash back at cvs, Instacart, YSL Beauty and other stores you love. You can even stack sales on top of cash back. Just start shopping with Rakuten to save money and get that cash back feeling. Join for free@rakuten.com or get the free Rakuten app that's R a K u t e n rakuten.com.
Narrator/Interviewer
The following podcast.
Narrator/Storyteller
Contains explicit language In May of 1973, Gail Sheehy was out on assignment for New York magazine to find some of Richard Nixon's most unwavering defenders.
Narrator/Interviewer
It was the first day of the Watergate hearings that I installed myself on a bar stool in Terry's Bar in Astoria, Queens.
Narrator/Storyteller
Sheehy went to Terry's bar every day for a week straight. The customers there were blue collar Nixon voters. They were iron workers, construction workers, elevator repairmen. Sheehy's plan was to watch the Senate hearings alongside them and talk to them about why they loved Nixon. But when the bar owner put the hearings on TV and floated the idea with his regulars, hey guys, you want.
Narrator/Interviewer
To watch that Watergate thing?
Narrator/Storyteller
Their answer was unanimous.
Narrator/Interviewer
Turn it off.
Narrator/Storyteller
It wasn't just that they weren't interested. As far as the barflies at Terry's were concerned, the the Senate hearings were just a big show put on by liberals who wanted to take down the President. Why should anyone reward them by watching? Over the course of her week in Queens, Sheehy got to know the President's people. She found them to be angry, demoralized, and disconcertingly comfortable with the idea of a police state run by Richard Nixon. Terry, the bar owner, told Sheehy that you need some strong man on the top now to start whipping everything into shape. It might scare some people. It doesn't scare me. Behind the bar, Terry had hung up a novelty certificate that said Nobody of the Year award.
Narrator/Interviewer
And that's the way these guys felt. They were nobodies, except that Richard Nixon gave them an identity. Richard Nixon was the tough guy who was going to get rid of all those anti war people, all those anarchists, terrorists, the people who were tearing down our country.
Narrator/Storyteller
Richard Nixon's apologists thought liberals were obsessed with attacking the President. Liberals, meanwhile, thought the Nixon apologists were willing to go to absurd lengths to ignore the truth about Watergate. That summer, as the Senate hearings captivated the nation, the Humorist Art Buchwald wrote a column in which he mapped out the rhetorical style of the Nixon apologist. He listed a series of instant responses that loyal Nixonites could deploy when attacked at a party. Number one on the list was everyone does it.
Historian Rick Perlstein
And I used to hear that from my dad. My dad said Watergate. You know, everyone did that kind of stuff. Nixon just got caught.
Narrator/Storyteller
That's historian Rick Perlstein, author of the Invisible Bridge.
Historian Rick Perlstein
Number two was, what about Chappaquiddick?
Narrator/Storyteller
Chappaquiddick was the place on Martha's Vineyard where Ted Kennedy had driven his car off a bridge leading to the drowning of a young woman who was rumored to be his mistress. Nixon may have been a bad guy, the argument went, but Ted Kennedy was way, way worse.
Historian Rick Perlstein
Number eight was, wait until all the facts come out. That was Ronald Reagan's favorite.
Narrator/Storyteller
Number 28 was, I'm sick and tired of hearing about Watergate and so is Everybody else. Number 32 was what about Chappaquiddick? To a large extent, the public response to Watergate broke down predictably along party lines. A study from August of 1973 found that Democrats were substantially more likely than Republicans to express grave concern over Watergate, while Republicans were more likely than Democrats to find the President credible. But the divide between people who loved and hated Richard Nixon wasn't always a partisan one, as Gail Sheehy found in her reporting for New York magazine. Many of the patrons at Terry's Bar were lifelong Democrats who had turned to Nixon as the world changed around them.
Narrator/Interviewer
They saw this eruption in 68 the anti war movement, the civil rights movement, promoting blacks, denigrating our war, and then the women's movement. I mean, it was overwhelming. They couldn't stand it. So they gravitated towards this man who appeared to speak for them, who was pro war when he came in, who was a closet racist, who was very down on intellectuals and liberals.
Narrator/Storyteller
Nixon's supporters kept the faith for a very, very long time. That included members of the electorate who had voted for him in 1968 and 1972 and would have voted for him a third time if given the opportunity. It also included elected officials, politicians who had backed the President for years and didn't see any reason to stop. One Republican congressman from Tennessee urged his fellow lawmakers to resist joining the legislative lynch mob. To underscore the point, he held up a rope tied into a hangman's noose. The chairman of the Republican National Committee at the time was George H.W. bush. Here's Bush speaking to a gathering of Southern Republicans in Atlanta in December of 1973.
George H.W. Bush / Host Leon Naifau
The people are going to tell their members of Congress. The people are going to tell their members of the United States Senate. Let the man do the job he was elected to do.
Narrator/Storyteller
Remember by this point, John Dean had testified about Nixon's participation in the COVID up and James McCord had testified about the grubby particulars of bugging phones on behalf of Nixon's re election campaign. The former Attorney General had testified about the deranged acts of political sabotage that had been discussed inside the Department of Justice. And still Nixon's people held on. Why did so many Americans continue to stand by Richard Nixon even as it became clear that he was a criminal who had abused his power? How did Nixon's admirers, allies and foot soldiers defend him? How did even as more and more evidence of indefensible behavior piled up? And how did these loyalists react when they learned there were tape recordings of the President's private conversations, Recordings that could settle once and for all the question of who was lying about Watergate and who was telling the truth? This is Slow Burn. I'm your host, Leon Naifau.
George H.W. Bush / Host Leon Naifau
I don't think a man in his position would resort to something like that. That was foolhardy anyway. The FBI said that Franklin Roosevelt did it a lot. Truman did. If the election were held again today, the results would not be measurably different.
Narrator/Storyteller
Episode 5 True Believers.
Podcast Host/Promoter
If you want to hear the rest of this season and support what we do, now's the perfect time to join Slate plus. You can join directly within Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or visit slate.com slowburnplus to get access wherever you listen.
Date: January 2, 2018
Host: Slate Podcasts
Host/Storyteller: Leon Naifau
This episode of Slow Burn, titled "True Believers," examines why so many Americans—particularly those from working-class backgrounds—continued to support President Richard Nixon in the thick of the Watergate scandal. Through reporting, archival clips, and historical interviews, the episode delves into the psychology and motivations of Nixon’s most loyal defenders, unraveling how partisanship, cultural anxiety, and deep emotional investments shaped public reaction as damning evidence against the President emerged.
[01:41] Terry (bar owner):
"You need some strong man on the top now to start whipping everything into shape. It might scare some people. It doesn’t scare me."
[02:44] Rick Perlstein (Historian):
"My dad said Watergate. You know, everyone did that kind of stuff. Nixon just got caught."
[05:07] George H.W. Bush:
"The people are going to tell their members of Congress. The people are going to tell their members of the United States Senate. Let the man do the job he was elected to do."
[06:11] Unnamed Loyalist:
"I don’t think a man in his position would resort to something like that. That was foolhardy anyway. The FBI said that Franklin Roosevelt did it a lot. Truman did. If the election were held again today, the results would not be measurably different."
The host maintains a reflective and analytical tone, contextualizing archival material and interviews to evoke the tension and confusion of the Watergate era. The episode aims not just to describe what happened, but to capture what it felt like to navigate a country divided by loyalty, fear, and the stubborn insistence on believing in a political hero against all odds.
"True Believers" dives into the unyielding faith of Nixon’s defenders during Watergate, revealing the interplay of partisanship, social anxiety, and emotional identity. Through first-hand reporting and sharp historical context, the episode underscores how facts alone rarely shatter political loyalties—and how major scandals, then and now, often deepen, rather than diminish, a leader’s core support.