
Hosted by Ronald Stockton · EN

Send us Fan MailBiden carried Georgia by just under 12,000 votes. They had a Republican governor and Republican Secreatary of State. Trump called them and asked them to "find" those votes. I just need one more than Biden got to carry the state. Trump threatened the Secretary of State with prosecution if he did not "find" the votes. The county prosecutor Fannie Wills charged the president with corruption. Trump fought furiously. In time, Wills was removed for conflict of interest. (She was boinking one of her associates). The person who replaced her was a well respected prosecutor. Today he dismissed the case. Why? 1. The case should never have been in a county court. It should have been in a federal court. Allowing every county prosecutor to bring criminal charges against a president would produce chaos. 2. The critical sentence from Trump about "find the votes" could have been interpreted as having criminal intent OR just urging the local official to do his job. The law specifies that if reasonable people could interpret a statement in two ways, the prosecutor is obligated to grant the accused the benefit of the doubt. 3. The case was very complex with many individuals named. It would have involved multiple trials. 4. Trump is now in office. It could not go to trial until he was out of office. That would be very difficult. What I do not yet understand is what happens to all of the peripheral individuals who already pleaded guilty to being a part of a conspiracy and have been sentenced. Wills used the RICO law to suggest that there were a host of people involved in this effort. This podcast will explain the original indictment document, including the logic of the RICO charge. This is not long and is very informative.

Send us Fan MailAfter the catastrophic defeat at Charleston, the Patriot forces were on the ropes. General Clinton, commander of the British army, was so confident of the outcome, that he left his deputy, General Cornwallis, in charge and headed north. Cornwallis planned to link up with Tory militias from North and South Carolina, to crush resistance, and to remove two more stars from the flag. (The British already controlled Georgia, at least they thought they did). The Tory militias, backed up by some regulars, had gathered at King's Mountain right on the border between North and South Carolina. They were in a formidable position, holding the high ground. The plan was to link up with Cornwallis, finish off the rebellion, and go home as heroes. What could go wrong? But four battles (Musgrave Mill, Cowpens, King's Mountain, and Guilford Courthouse) changed the tragectory of the war. We have been watching the Ken Burns masterpiece on The American Revolution. This story is told in the last episode.

Send us Fan MailChrista Bruhn was my student back in the 1980s. I remember very well the first time I met her. She told me she had lived for a semester in Gaza. I have been to Gaza twice and did not consider it a place for a young American woman to be spending a semester. But Christa was never able to get Palestine out of her soul. This is her own story of her life-long engagement with a land and a people whose survival is not guaranteed. In time she fell in love with a Palestinian student she met in the US. She moved with him to Jenin where she became fully integrated into her new Palestinian family. Christa shares amazing insights from her years in that land. I found it easy and very rewarding to interview her about her life and her book. This interview is over an hour long but you will be glad you listened.

Send us Fan MailI have been an expert witness in four deportation hearings. The job of an expert witness is to given the judge reasons to permit the individual to remain in the U. S. The cases were people from Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Palestine. The Palestinian case was the most interesting because it dealt with a stateless person. I also want to share with you a conversation I had with an Immigration judge. Immigration Attorney Shahad Atiya commented on this podcast: "Asylum law requires people to contort their fears into categories that sometimes make no sense to the expert observer. For those reasons, for the chemist, it was better for him to be able to select a category to be discriminated against such as religion, rather than fit himself into the catch all category (membership in a particular social group, that being chemists). That category kills many cases. Religion is black and white. What is membership in a particular social group anyway? We litigate this every day. "Although you mention these cases may be in the public record, they may be because of media attention or other ways they were discovered. Generally, asylum records and asylum cases are not discoverable and cannot be FOIA’d. You kept them anonymous though anyway. "Many of the timelines you mentioned for these cases put them under the Obama presidency. This shows that asylum law and its harsh realities know no party lines. "There is a level of privilege from the clients that you were an expert witness for having entered the U.S. legally and then applied after overstaying a visa. However, the privilege quickly fails when credibility is at the center of their case. Their credibility of their claims on the fact that they presented themselves at a port of entry, they held themselves out to be tourists or students or temporary workers or visitors. They told officers they intended to leave the U.S. but all along they had the intent to file for asylum because their claims naturally rest on things they experienced prior to their entry. Had their fear started while they were here, the case would be completely different. They would have a valid fear in the opinion of an officer and thereby now AFTER experiencing such events did their intentions change from nonimmigrant to immigrant. Islam and especially Shias put a lot of emphasis on the intentions you make prior to an act. I joke about how immigration law can be so Shia."

Send a textThis is a bit different from my typical podcast. This is four stories inspired by religion. The story of Rachel and Rebecca, and the mandrake. (You have never read this story so you know nothing about the mandrake (or even what it is). The Story of my close brush with the Rapture. (I will admit. I brought it on myself). The story of the first (?) female pope. So you have never heard of Pope Joan. Well, you will now learn about her. And the time I threw my hat into the ring when the papacy became vacant. (I know. It sounds like a bizarre scheme but the Church was in big trouble and i did not feel that I could just stand on the sidelines and watch it disintegrate). Then, just for the sake of those not yet offended, I threw in a few atheist jokes. Enjoy!

Send us a textRichard III was the last of the Plantagenets. He was killed by his rival Henry VII in 1485 at the battle of Bosworth Field. He has come down in history as a monster, thanks to Shakespeare and a Tudor propaganda campaign. This is the story of his life and what happened after his death and how he has received some modest rehabilitation. It is also the story of his body, how it was lost, and recovered. I once was asked to deliver a sermon reflecting on the life of Richard. The sermon is included. It is the only sermon I have ever delivered, and the only one I will ever deliver. This is an unusual podcast, but perhaps an entertaining one.