Loading summary
A
Hello, everyone. You are not used to hearing my voice in this feed. My name is Michelle Andrews. I am the co founder of Shameless Media. I'm here with Zara, my fellow co founder.
B
We're not used to sharing a mic, but we're sharing a mic today.
A
We're very close to each other and
B
we have our three beautiful, stylish hosts in the room as well, Joe, Annika and Mads, which we will get to in a moment. Let's explain why we're here first, because it might be a bit random.
A
Yeah. So if you're not on TikTok, you probably have missed this over the weekend, but the stylish segment on where people find their inspiration and their taste from that dropped at the end of Wednesday's episode, has received some backlash and some negative commentary. We feel as a company and as co founders of that company, it's responsible for us to actually unpack that and address that commentary.
B
Yeah. Particularly when the creator at the centre of the segment, Tamsin Wong herself, has had her very fair issues with some of it and wanted to kind of have a dialogue with us about it. And there's so much to talk about in this that we thought it. In many ways, it's impossible to capture in a snappy, sound bitey social media post. I think we're big proponents in this business of kind of having proper, mature conversations about things and being really honest and candid about that. So that's what we're going to do today with our hosts.
A
Yeah, we're going to unpack it all together because we think it's absolutely worthwhile doing. Maddie, Jo, Annika, welcome. Where do you guys want to kick off? Where do you want us to start?
C
I think. I mean, obviously never nice having commentary like the commentary we've had, and I think it's been deeply reflective for all of us. I think one thing that we think about when we come into the podcast is that we want it to feel like a wine bar with friends. And when we saw that video, we did feel really strongly that taste is, you know, so subjective and it was something that everyone can have a different feeling or viewpoint on. And I love Tamsen. I love her content. I've followed along, I've watched it. I thought that was an interesting take. I disagreed with it and I came across on the podcast more aggressive than I would probably like. And I think one rule we have off mic in the studio is how would we feel if that person that we're talking about was in the room with us? And I Don't think that we got the tone right on that one, because if she was here and she had a chair and a cup of tea with us, like, like we do every Monday when we record, I don't think that would have made her feel great. And I never want to make a woman and a woman in media in this space that we're in feel that way.
D
Yeah, I agree with you, Mads. I definitely made flippant and unnecessarily aggressive comments that were directed towards Tamsen. And I will say I didn't do my due diligence when it came to looking at the broader context of Tamsin's content and the other content that she creates. That was the first video I'd ever seen from her, so. So I also acknowledge I didn't do my due diligence in understanding her as a creator or as a person either before that segment.
B
I agree.
E
And I think, as well as woman, like, I don't think we've even realized just yet how powerful our influence is and how powerful our platform is on the Stylish podcast. And where I really feel badly about this is our intentions didn't land where I really had hoped because Hamsen, she has really thought about this, and I actually did agree with a lot of what she said, but it didn't really come through a lot. And so for that, I am sorry. And I. When it comes to our learnings, as, you know, three hosts in this room together, we have so much to take away and so much reflection and areas to grow. And I think going forward, it would be so nice just to have more of that open discussion and actually think about Tamsen and what she would've said in this room.
A
I love what you guys have said there. I think the main feedback I have seen is that the tone probably missed the mark.
E
Yeah.
D
Yeah.
A
That said, I feel like the message of your segment was something that a lot of people could see themselves in, that maybe the original video, they had a similar emotional reaction to it. I think what's tricky as broadcasters is when there's three of you in a room, the tone can very, very quickly get away. And you can't always have that bird's eye perspective in the moment to check that tone. And I think that's where it's our and my responsibility and the shameless media team's responsibility to be that bird's eye perspective. And that's where we have potentially let the show down, but also let Tamsen down, that that tone got away from us and we didn't maybe goalkeep it as well as we should have. It's probably not as known outside of the four walls of Shameless Media that you three are external hosts, you are contractors to the company. You do not control the social media that comes out about the show. That is something we have a whole team for. I'm heavily involved personally in the social media content coming out of Shameless and all of the podcasts that we represent. And I think it's a really interesting one for us as a company going forward. It's an opportunity for us to be better in that the cut downs we pick, the videos we pick from every podcast need to reflect the tone of a segment. And I think this is where it's tricky for you guys that the cut down we put up on social, it went up on TikTok, it went up on Instagram, couldn't reflect the full nuance of that conversation you all had on Mike together. And if I had my time again as the co founder of the business, I would take the lessons from that video and not put it up. But it did go up. And going forward, we will do cut downs differently as a business and that's what we not only owe you guys, that's what we owe Tamsen and it's what we owe everyone on socials. How can we expect people to come to us with nuanced thoughts if the cut down we're putting out there is not fully nuanced? And it's very, very hard to capture nuance in a 90 second video?
B
Yeah, I think that's bang on. I think in many ways that's one thing we speak about a lot. It's like you can't be surprised about the mood with which the room meets you at with the segment or with a video if that's the tone you're setting. I will say though, just to be really clear, the cut down is in many ways not just the feedback we're getting. Like the segment itself to your, to your guys point, it's like, oh, there are ways we would have done that differently. The tone would have changed slightly, it would have been less aggressive perhaps there would have been like less giggling in many ways than what you guys said before. Yeah, I, I think it's important though to say I don't think you guys would have changed your opinion per se.
D
No, I don't think I would change my opinion on that segment as a whole. And I honestly, I think I kind of projected my feelings about that entire segment in its, in its entirety onto Tamsen. As a creator, because her video was put into our notes as an example. The three of us actually didn't source that video ourselves. It was popped in by the production team as an example of a way to expand on this whole topic of where people are getting their inspiration from and in our whip. I remember kind of being like, oh, I don't really have anything to add to this conversation, to be honest. Cause it just kind of feels like a bit above me. I don't feel like I'm a tastemaker. I don't feel like I'm super tasteful. I guess that's not how I would position myself. So this kind of felt like a bit beyond me. And I think I projected a bit of that onto Tamsin. And I absolutely think that my language and the way I came into it a bit aggressively towards Tamsin was completely uncalled for. And I apologize to her for that. I think that was just unwarranted.
B
I think here it's also important to acknowledge another key thread I'm seeing online is about the deletion of that TikTok. And I think that's really fair. If you guys don't mind. Do you mind if I take this? Because I don't think that has any bearing on you guys. I think as Timish's point before, it is a really interesting dynamic behind the scenes where you guys come in and host the show as external contractors, but there is a whole internal production team that, you know, edit the show, put the videos together, run the social media accounts, and when that video was deleted, a natural level of emotion that drove that decision, rather than pragmatism, anxiety, dare I say.
A
And to let everyone into the kind of machinations of what goes into the decision to delete. Arnika, you're 39 weeks pregnant. I think naturally as well, it was the decision to protect you and the team from a certain level of anxiety. Again. If I had my time again or if the social team had their time again, would it be deleted? Probably not. I think eventually that ends up looking like we're willing to have the big girl opinion without copying the big girl feedback. And I think that's a huge one for Shameless Media. I remember early days of Shameless podcasts. We would do the delete. And I don't think we can or should going forward. We will, as a media company, get things wrong. That is part of analysing culture. The difficult but honest reality of that is if you're gonna have opinions, you've gotta cop them in return. And we shouldn't have deleted it. There is a rhetoric online that shameless media is deleting everything. I just wanna be really clear with the listeners. We deleted the TikTok video. The Instagram cut down is still live. We have not been deleting comments. I know that is commentary that we are getting back. I have spoken to the team. Apparently no one has done that. I don't know if they're being hidden or what is going on. But just as a bit of a fact check on that the TikTok was deleted. It probably shouldn't have been and we probably wouldn't again. How does that feel to you guys? Because I can imagine as hosts of a show it can be anxiety inducing to then not have full control over the socials.
C
We sit in a very unique situation where we are three individuals who have businesses and you know, we do our thing and then we come here and we are the faces of the content for the stylish pillar or a lot one, one part of the ecosystem. And I guess, you know, that is sometimes fantastic. We have the privilege of being in a production business and a media business where we work on our scripts, we know, you know, we have the editorial conversation, we come in and then we get to record. We don't have to edit the episodes, we don't have to do the social cut downs, we don't have to stitch and clip. That's, you know, that's the shameless media teams piece. They're the perks. It's low touch in that regard. I'm like the amount of people that think we work here full time, we do not. Sure it's very fun office that I can attest. But yeah, that is anxiety riddling sometimes and As I said, 99% of the time I think we get it right. This one we didn't.
D
Yeah. And scenarios like this can become a little bit more distressing when it's when not in control of what's happening on socials and it's not up to us. And I think some of the discourse online was kind of insinuating that we were in control of this and we were the three people that deleted the TikTok and we weren't. And so that can be really tricky to navigate as well. And transparently the three of us have stayed off socials to be honest and I think that's probably been the best thing for us to stay away from that ongoing conversation. We're still very much aware of what is what the sentiment is online and thanks to you two mission Zara for filling us in on all of that. But also we really wanted to regroup in here on a Sunday all together. The fight. How many? One, two, three, four, five people in a room.
C
I'm not good at maths.
D
To really talk about this thoughtfully and not just diminish it to a reply in a TikTok comment or a story frame. We wanted to really chat about this more extensively so that we could highlight that we do regret our tone of that segment and we do regret how we address Tamsin and the way that we went about that. It missed the mark and we apologize to her for that. I think we stand by our opinions about that whole segment in its totality that, you know, maybe we feel like people should be able to get inspiration wherever they want to get it, essentially.
B
Yeah, completely. And I think, just to reiterate that point, I think an unfavorable interpretation of what you said in that, like you're getting off TikTok would be, oh, so you want to ignore the feedback. And I really want to remind people that when the feedback in your DMs looks how it does right now, it is actually not helpful. And it is more helpful as a team and as a business. What the best way forward is is for us to have multiple people behind the scenes tracking it, packaging it and feeding it back to you so you understand what's being said without the abuse that's coming with it too. Just to be really clear as well,
A
the funny thing about this, and I guess the opportunity for all of us, not just Zara and I as the co founders of the business, but the three of you as stylish host, is that this is not the last time we will be unpacking a creator's TikTok videos. Right. It is the content remit of stylish that you guys will be considering what is trending on social media and having honest opinions about this. I think the worst case scenario off the back of this particular instance is that you will all not be honest and you'll just say the. The easy, palatable thing. I don't want that. I want your honest opinions. I want to know how you feel. But of course, tone is equally important. As part of that, I want to know, what do you all think will be the tweaks that are made off the back of this the next time we talk about a viral TikTok video? What will we do differently as a business and what will you three do differently as hosts? Because that's just part of the job.
E
I think hindsight is Such a beautiful thing. And I think something we've talked about a lot is vulnerability and actually putting our hands up and saying when we got it wrong. And I think the discourse that we obviously have created here, I have no shame in being like, you know what? Yes, sometimes we can come across a little bit flippant, but I've taken the time to reflect. I can see your opinion. I respect your opinion. And I really want to make sure that, like, we are treating like the creators or whoever we're speaking about on this podcast as if they're in the room. I want them to feel like they're included in this conversation. So it's not just like the three of us piling onto somebody or just having a really strong opinion, because we did have a strong opinion. We did say what we said. And I think we need to now take accountability for what was said in this room. We also need to give Tamsin the space to respond how she has responded. And I think for me, there's just so many learnings we're gonna get it wrong sometimes. We will make mistakes. And it's just the nature of having
A
an opinion, and it's why it's important to get in rooms like this and just cop to it. Like, big girl opinion, big girl response, I think, as well. And I wonder if Mads and Jo, you can speak to this. I think a lot of people see the dynamic of three women unpacking one woman, and they feel inherently uncomfortable. What would you say to that?
C
Yeah, I mean, I think it feels. It feels high school y. I think just by nature, having three people unpack something that someone isn't there to talk about or defend or be interviewed on,
B
which will, I'd say, be an inevitability of any show going forward that like 1,000% that will. It's not like we can sit here and say, oh, we'll just never talk about a single creator again. That will happen. But I think to what you're saying, it's keeping that top of mind.
A
And look, one of the interesting things I found from Tamsen was the commentary of, well, tag me in the video if you're going to post it. And it's about me and it's not behind my back. If you are not speaking behind my back, quote unquote, in that high school style, Mads, tag me in the video. And to be honest, that's not feedback for the three of you to consider. That's feedback for Zara and I to consider with the processes of the company that should. That be part of cut downs when they go up on social media. Should that be part of the social media process? I'm not going to sit here and pretend I have a cut and dry answer for that right now, but it is absolutely a conversation to be had. Any final thoughts or comments? I think it's been really helpful to all get in a room and toss it around. A lot of these conversations happen behind closed doors often. It's been really refreshing even to sit with these microphones and look.
C
I feel like we can probably wrap it up there. I think an opportunity for us to do better, assess how we're doing things at the moment and make a great show.
D
And just to give you a heads up, we will be back on Wednesday. That episode on Wednesday was prerecorded because Annika is technically on maternity leave right now. So you will have us back in your ears then. But just be aware that we did record that separately.
A
Thank you for talking about it with us, guys. Thank you for coming in and being vulnerable and being honest and we really are grateful for you all doing that. And to Tamsen, thank you as well for the conversation.
Podcast: Style-ish
Host: Shameless Media
Episode: Unpacking your feedback
Date: March 8, 2026
This episode of Style-ish departs from the usual format to directly address and unpack recent backlash and critical feedback following a segment about where people source their style inspiration. The episode centers on responsibility, tone, accountability, and the realities of producing opinion-led podcasts—especially when public social cut-downs are involved. The hosts, joined by Shameless Media co-founders Michelle Andrews and Zara, transparently discuss what prompted the controversy, the response, and how they plan to grow from this moment.
“We feel as a company and as co founders... it's responsible for us to actually unpack that and address that commentary.” — Michelle (00:20)
“One rule we have off mic in the studio is how would we feel if that person that we're talking about was in the room with us?... I don't think that we got the tone right on that one.” — Mads (01:48)
“I will say I didn't do my due diligence in looking at the broader context of Tamsin's content... I also acknowledge I didn't do my due diligence.” — Jo (02:34)
“If I had my time again... I would take the lessons from that video and not put it up. But it did go up. And going forward, we will do cut downs differently as a business...” — Michelle (05:14)
“I honestly, I think I kind of projected my feelings about that entire segment... onto Tamsin. And I absolutely think that my language and the way I came into it a bit aggressively... was completely uncalled for.” — Jo (06:11)
“We will, as a media company, get things wrong... if you're gonna have opinions, you've gotta cop them in return. And we shouldn't have deleted it.” — Michelle (08:12)
“We are three individuals who... come here and we are the faces of the content for the stylish pillar... That is anxiety riddling sometimes... 99% of the time I think we get it right. This one we didn’t.” — Mads (09:07)
“We want to make sure... we are treating the creators or whoever we’re speaking about on this podcast as if they’re in the room.” — Annika (12:38)
“It feels high school y. I think just by nature, having three people unpack something that someone isn’t there to talk about or defend or be interviewed on.” — Mads (13:54)
| Segment | Speaker(s) | Timestamp | |------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------| | Introduction & Purpose | Michelle, Zara | 00:00–01:16| | Initial Reflections from Hosts | Mads, Jo, Annika | 01:29–03:42| | Company-level Reflections & Responsibility | Michelle | 03:42–05:36| | Tone vs. Critique | Zara, Jo | 05:36–07:08| | Transparency in Moderation Decisions | Zara, Michelle | 07:08–09:07| | The Host Experience as External Presenters | Mads, Jo | 09:07–10:44| | Avoiding Social Media Pile-on & Accountability | Jo, Michelle, Annika| 10:45–13:37| | 'Three vs. One' Dynamic & Future Processes | Michelle, Mads | 13:37–15:03| | Closing & Reflections | All | 15:03–15:24|
The episode closes with gratitude to the hosts and Tamsen, and a heads-up about the following pre-recorded episode. The tone is honest, reflective, and future-focused, emphasizing growth, accountability, and a renewed commitment to a fair, nuanced conversation around fashion discourse.