Chris Best

Summary

Tetragrammaton with Rick Rubin – Chris Best (April 29, 2026)

Episode Overview

In this episode, Rick Rubin sits down with Chris Best, co-founder and CEO of Substack, the influential newsletter and publishing platform. The conversation dives deep into the founding story of Substack, the changing media landscape, challenges around business models and free speech, and the evolution of the internet’s creator economy. With a mix of philosophical musings and practical advice, Chris Best discusses the rise of independent writing, platform controversies, Substack's future, and what it means to support a healthy culture of ideas.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Origin Story of Substack

• Motivation: Chris Best describes his initial frustration with the state of online media and the lack of sustainable business models for quality content (00:23).

  “Great writing and great culture in general is this deeply valuable thing. And so I was like, I should write. How hard could it be? … but the Internet…hasn't replaced, especially the economic engines that made those things go in a way that was satisfactory to me.” – Chris Best, [00:23]

• Initial spark: Encouraged by his friend Hamish, Chris moved from complaining about media to envisioning solutions—specifically, how to empower creators.
• The Core Idea: Substack is built on the premise that writers and creators are “the heroes,” deserving independence, the ability to make money, and creative freedom (02:23).

2. Building Substack: Vision, First Steps, and Naming

• ‘Science Fiction Vision’ vs. Humble Beginnings: Chris explains the importance of having a global vision while building actionable, incremental steps (03:15).
• Newsletter as a Model: The rise of paid email newsletters (notably Ben Thompson’s Stratechery) inspired the Substack model—direct audience connection and economic sustainability (03:50).
• Name Origins: Substack vs. Monograph; fate intervened when the Monograph domain was taken (07:47).

3. Platform Philosophy and Business Model

• Direct Connection: Substack’s power lies in creators having direct relationships with audiences—email and podcasts were the only true “rectangles” on the home screen to enable this at the start (12:07).
• Exit Rights: A fundamental promise was creator ownership—a writer could always take their email list and leave, engendering trust (13:24).
• Revenue Model: Substack makes money only when writers do, taking a percentage of subscription revenue, aligning incentives (16:23).

  “The only way we make money is by taking a percentage. And so we literally can't make money without the people on the platform succeeding.” – Chris Best, [16:23]

• Learning from Users: The necessity of offering both free and paid options (even after initial ideological insistence on only paid) was quickly apparent from real user needs (16:58).

4. Media Industry Context and Creators’ Independence

• Journalism Before Substack: Chris describes a “narrowing of thought” and loss of diversity in mainstream media, leading to his belief that “healthy intellectual culture” needed new structures (20:35).
• Writers Fleeing Institutions: 2020’s “fever pitch” of ideological conformity led many high-profile journalists (e.g., Matt Yglesias, Bari Weiss, Paul Krugman) to seek independence on Substack (22:16-24:02).

  “It was like Théoden after Wormtongue left in the Lord of the Rings. Like he de-aged 10 years and regained his vigor.” – Chris Best on Matt Yglesias, [23:21]

• Bari Weiss and Institution-Building: Substack supports not only individual voices but also institution-builders like Weiss, whose Free Press sold for $150 million (24:00).

5. Substack Features, Growth, and Product Evolution

• Feature Expansion: Substack quickly added web versions, free newsletters, podcasts, and apps—even enabling AI-powered read-aloud, auto-publishing to YouTube, and live audio/video events (14:58, 55:13).
• Discovery & Community: The launch of the Substack app, Notes feature, and ‘bazaar’ model allow for internal discovery and community, making Substack less reliant on external social platforms (34:34–38:07).
• Algorithmic Differences: Unlike attention-driven social media, Substack’s algorithms are designed to connect users with high-value content they might pay for, promoting a healthier media diet (39:31).

6. Substack, Social Media, and Platform Competition

• Relationship with Twitter: Initially symbiotic, but over time, as Twitter’s algorithm penalized outbound links and Substack launched more internal features (Notes), the relationship soured, even leading to blocks and demotion of Substack content on Twitter (64:24–69:15).

  “There was a week where not only could you not share a Substack link, if you just said the word substack, nobody would see your thing.” – Chris Best, [67:06]

• Substack vs. Medium & Patreon: Unlike Medium’s “Netflix for writing” and Patreon’s payment-focused approach, Substack prioritizes creator-audience ownership and network-driven discovery (72:24).

7. Free Speech, Controversies, and Moderation Philosophy

• First Amendment Values: Substack aspires to a broad interpretation of free speech, taking inspiration from the First Amendment (42:43-43:43).
• Decentralized Moderation: Each writer owns their house—sets their own rules for their community (46:57-48:27).
• Navigating Controversy: From trans issues to COVID skepticism to political disputes, Substack’s approach is to avoid editorial positions and not yield to “social media mobs” or pressure campaigns (49:06-53:42).

  “If you're going to get smashed, get smashed for doing something you believe in, because that's worth it.” – Chris Best, [53:31]

8. Best Practices & Advice for Substack Creators

• Start Now, Iterate: Don’t overthink—just publish, and do it frequently. Volume and momentum matter (77:24–80:31).
• Promotion: Creators should share their work, leverage word-of-mouth, and let Substack’s infrastructure support discovery, while overcoming the allergy to self-promotion (80:34-81:11).
• Audience Engagement: Comments can be paywalled; reply functions can be private—community engagement is central (75:28-77:20).
• Serialization & Bundling: There’s opportunity for book serialization, bundled subscriptions, and creative cross-promotion (83:15–86:55).

9. Substack’s Future and Technology

• AI Features: While wary of AI hype, Substack is adding features like auto-generated read-alouds, video/audio editing aids, and live conversation tools, aiming to “make it magically do the things you want it to do” (59:48–60:36).
• Expanding Genres: From heterodox commentary to crypto, mainstream politics, and fiction, Substack’s popularity has moved in cultural waves (87:26–88:20).
• Defending Creators: Programs like Substack Defender provide legal support for independent journalists against intimidation (88:46-91:01).

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the Big Vision of Substack

  “I think you could power a renaissance…by giving kind of like the tools that the creative class need, you could actually create something that really meaningfully changed the world.” – Chris Best, [03:15]

• On Algorithmic Discovery vs. Human Will

  “Algorithms are just technology. They are a way to amplify the will of the maker of the thing.” – Chris Best, [11:08]

• On Journalism and Institutional Pushback

  “The narrowing of allowable perspectives reached a fever pitch and jettisoned a lot of the original thinkers. The people who were least likely to go along to get along were the most likely to get [pushed out].” – Chris Best, [21:57]

• On Social Media Dynamics

  “You can, with some structure and with some giving people the right tools and the right power themselves…have something that actually works and is beautiful and that people are free.” – Chris Best, [48:56]

• On Overcoming the Social Media Mob

  “As painful as it was, we did just sort of hold firm...a lot of our success was just not giving in, like not getting tilted, just being like, yep, everyone's mad...But we're not going to abdicate our responsibility or our judgment...” – Chris Best, [52:59–53:31]

• On Substack’s Cultural Phases

  “At any given time, it's tempting for people to, like, think that the current flourishing that's happening on Substack is the whole platform. But the reality is that it's this index fund of culture. It's got all these different things, and it changes all the time, which makes it fun.” – Chris Best, [88:20]

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• [00:23–05:17] — Substack’s origin and core philosophy
• [12:07–14:24] — Why email and direct connection mattered
• [20:35–24:02] — The state of media, journalism, and creators’ independence
• [24:00–25:28] — Bari Weiss, Free Press, counterculture becoming mainstream
• [34:34–39:31] — Substack app, discovery ecosystem, and algorithm design
• [42:43–53:31] — Free speech philosophy, handling controversy, moderation
• [55:13–58:33] — Features: podcasting, app usage, read-aloud, Substack Live
• [77:24–80:31] — Creator advice: start, publish more, iterate, community engagement
• [83:15–86:55] — Serialization, fiction, bundling, and Substack’s future
• [88:46–91:01] — Substack Defender and legal support for creators
• [64:24–69:15] — The complex relationship with Twitter, link throttling, and free speech
• [72:24–75:28] — Contrast with Medium & Patreon

---

Episode Takeaways

• Substack emerged as both a response to media industry dysfunction and an experiment in creator empowerment, leveraging direct connection and sustainable business models.
• Independence for writers—and now audio/video creators—is nurtured not just by product features, but by principled stances on free speech, ownership, and platform incentives.
• The platform is dynamic, riding successive cultural waves, adapting features, and reconceiving the media-company-of-the-future.
• Substack positions itself as an “index fund of culture,” a bustling digital bazaar where new cultural movements can gestate, flourish, and, sometimes, become the new mainstream.

For creators and readers alike, Substack represents a hopeful experiment in what the next era of the Internet’s intellectual and cultural life might look like.

Transcript

[Narrator/Announcer]

Tetragrammaton.

[Chris Best]

I've always believed that the things you read and the media you consume in general is not just how you spend a big chunk of your life. It changes you. And so great writing and great culture in general is this deeply valuable thing. And so I was like, I should write. How hard could it be? I would love that. I have ideas. I know how to type. Like, I'm a programmer. I love reading. And I started writing what I thought was going to be an essay or a blog post or a screen of some sort, like, detailing my frustrations with the media economy on the Internet, kind of just complaining in broad strokes. Look, the Internet came along, smashed a lot of the business models that used to sustain culture and hasn't really. I mean, it's created a lot of wonderful things. There's been a lot of promise, but it hasn't yet replaced, especially the economic engines that made those things go in a way that was satisfactory to me. And I was just kind of whining. I was going off and saying, wah, wah, Craigslist killed the classifieds, and maybe Facebook is not an unalloyed good. And I sent it to my friend Hamish, who's actually a writer, and he let me down very gently. He's like, these are all good points you make, but it's 2017 and you are not quite as original as you think you are. Other people may have noticed that some of these trends are going on, but he's like, here's how you could make this essay you're writing better is you should add a section that just says, so what do you do about it? How could this be different? It's easy to complain. It's easy to say, here's everything that's wrong. It's much more interesting, though. It would be more interesting as a reader to have a theory of what could a new and better thing be? And we started arguing, basically. And that argument turned into what became the core idea for Substack.

[Interviewer]

And what was the core idea?

[Chris Best]

The core idea is that the writers and the people who make the culture are the heroes. And they need independence in order to give the thing they have to give to the world. They need the freedom to make the things they want to make. And they need to be able to make money. And not just make money, incidentally, but to be able to make money doing the work they believe in. And that if you can create those conditions, not only will it appeal to the best writers, the best makers, the things that will get created will be different and better.

[Interviewer]

And then from writing that, what was the moment of, okay, I'm going to build this, as opposed to just a theoretical solution to a problem.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, we were arguing about the thing. And I've always felt that if you. You sort of need two things to have a really worthwhile idea in technology. You need to have sort of what I think of as the science fiction vision, sort of a grand, important idea for how the world could be different that actually matters. And you need to have sort of a humble beginning. You need to have, like a first step that you can actually take soon to be able to make progress towards that thing. You don't have to know how it connects. I don't think you can have this kind of foggy city on the hill, and then you can have this next thing that you do. You have to have some belief that you're going in the right direction, but you don't have to know where the rest of the path lives. And as we were arguing, we sort of realized we were developing this grand science fiction vision, this idea that you could make a new economic engine for culture. I mean, ultimately, to me, it's like, I think you could power a renaissance. Not as in we would be the ones to do it, but by giving kind of like the tools that the creative class need, you could actually create something that really meaningfully changed the world. And we had this very simple place to get started, which was this idea of a paid email newsletter. And there was already people that were doing this in the world. There was this guy, Ben Thompson, who wrote a thing called Stratechary that was like a tech business newsletter. You know, he was writing this thing from his bedroom in Taiwan, making millions of dollars a year, so sending out this email that people paid for. And we looked at that and we were like, hey, that's something new and better is getting made. And is successful. Successful in that it makes some money, but also successful in that it's making something that people really value. And it works today for this person, and there's no reason it shouldn't work for some more people. And it is actually a viable kernel of this much larger thing.

[Interviewer]

Tell me a little more about the much larger thing. Like in the fantasy version of it, Tell me the big version of the dream of what it could actually be.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, the thing that really appealed to me then, it was around independence. It was around the idea that in the early days it was really writers, because that was sort of that initial. Hamish was a writer. I'd been trying to write. It was this writer focused thing. I don't think the. The idea is actually not only for writers, but I felt that the people who were the most interesting to read had this kind of, like, outsider nerd thing. And if you could free them to pursue their obsession or pursue their vision to the utmost, would allow the creation of new culture. And in order to free them, you had to give them a business model that actually worked for them. You had to have a strong presumption of freedom of the press, but also you had to, like, make it simple enough for a person to actually use. And, you know, one way to look at Substack early on was like, hey, come and type into this box. And if the things you type are actually great, which is really hard, by the way, almost nobody can do it. But if you can do that one thing, if you can type something great, to put it reductively, we will make the rest magically work for you. You will get rich and famous. If you can type this thing, that's great, which is hard enough.

[Interviewer]

Did you think of it as a countercultural thing or no?

[Chris Best]

Yeah, I would say so. At least in the sense that really good new ideas are always countercultural. Or there was.

[Interviewer]

It always starts as the counterculture.

[Chris Best]

Yeah. I mean, the things that were not countercultural weren't as ill served. Like there was lots of outlets for the main culture, I suppose.

[Interviewer]

So the first step, seeing a paid email, that made sense, seemed like this could be a good way to start.

[Chris Best]

Yeah. And that part was not an exciting blog post to write, but it sort of triggered. I saw that as, oh, we could make this tomorrow. There's something we could do here that would work and it would be the first step towards this bigger thing we feel we're seeing.

[Interviewer]

How did the name come?

[Chris Best]

We had it narrowed down to two names. We had lots of ideas.

[Interviewer]

What was the other one?

[Chris Best]

It was either going to be Substack or Monograph.

[Interviewer]

Both respectable.

[Chris Best]

Both respectable.

[Interviewer]

How did you choose?

[Chris Best]

Somebody bought the domain monograph.com while we were arguing about it. And I said, screw it, I'm buying Substack.

[Interviewer]

Okay. Do you know what the first piece posted on Substack was?

[Chris Best]

The very first piece that was physically posted was sort of a manifesto that we, Hamish and I wrote. You know, once we decided to make the company, we kind of got to work. I started building the website that was going to hold the thing, and he started writing kind of of an original vision for the thing. And I felt that we couldn't publish it somewhere else. We had to use our own software to publish the first piece. So that was the first thing that was ever published at all. And then the first substack launch was this guy, Bill Bishop, who had been writing an email newsletter about China for kind of a business and government audience.

[Interviewer]

And how did you get him to move to substack?

[Chris Best]

Well, he read the manifesto. I think Hamish had known him for a while. Often this is the thing you want when you're making a new product. It's like, you don't want it to be kind of good for a lot of people. You want it to be really good for, like, one person.

[Interviewer]

Yeah.

[Chris Best]

And he was that guy. He had been. He'd been already writing an email newsletter. He already had this audience of dedicated business and government people that loved it and had a ton of value in it. He'd been thinking about charging for it, but he couldn't, you know, didn't want to mess around with all of the technical details of doing it. So when we went to him and said, hey, can we just make that happen for you? He's like, that sounds great.

[Interviewer]

Is there any competition in this space, or.

[Chris Best]

No, I would say there's lots of people who have been, to my mind, copying the output, who look and say, oh, it's email newsletter publishing. So send an email and charge money. We can copy that and for cheaper. And then we've had a couple of iterations of, you know, the old Twitter bought a competitor that was like that and then tried to build the feature into and. And then after Elon bought it, they tried to build the feature into X. Facebook spun up a clone for a while called Bulletin and sort of tried to, like, cargo cult it from my perspective, I mean, I'm biased, but there's nobody, to me that seems to be doing the exact same thing we're trying to do. The thing that I set my sights on in the world right now is just YouTube. Because YouTube, of the major networks, is the closest to being an economic engine for culture. It actually does pay people. It has an opinion about how that should work. And it is just completely enormous and dominant and is in some ways so good. And then I think in other ways, it falls short.

[Interviewer]

I hear creators complain that the monetization part of it is not great.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, it's just. Okay. I'm curious if this resonates for you, but I've heard people who are sometimes very successful people on YouTube who say, I have an idea for a thing I would like to make. I know it will be great, and I know there's an audience who would love it. But I can't distribute it. Like, it won't work on YouTube because the algorithm won't like it.

[Interviewer]

I see.

[Chris Best]

And I think that's too bad, because it's sort of. That limits your ability to take a creative risk, I think.

[Interviewer]

Tell me about the pluses and minuses of the algorithm.

[Chris Best]

I think people probably underrate the pluses because algorithms are just technology. They are a way to amplify the will of the maker of the thing. And having an algorithm allows for really superhuman matching of people to things that they want to find. And when it works well, it can create serendipity. I think it can help something find an audience that loves it in a way that would have been impossible if you were trying to rely on only manual curation or only commercial discovery or something else.

[Interviewer]

Did you consider in the early days any options besides email and any payment models other than subscription?

[Chris Best]

The reason I think email was one of two things that we could have used at the time, because the basic theory behind it was the thing you want out of Substack as a creator is a direct connection to your audience. When people subscribe to you, the social contractor of that is saying, hey, I'm putting enough trust in you that I'm giving you the right to come, reach out and tap me on the shoulder. And that's the thing that allows you to take a creative risk and presume upon that and say, hey, this might not have found you otherwise, but because you have subscribed to me, I'm going to presume upon that and send you this. So the direct connection was the key thing we wanted to enable. And then we were living in a sort of a smartphone age where my view is there's a limited number of rectangles on your home screen that you have, and most people have, like three to seven that they actually go to. And in order to really have the connection to the place where people are consuming things, you have to be in one of those rectangles. And most of the rectangles were not just powered by algorithms, but they were powered by algorithms that were actively hostile to the idea of having a direct connection. Right. Facebook does not want to give you a direct connection to your audience. Neither does Twitter, Neither does Facebook. You know, even YouTube doesn't really.

[Interviewer]

Their business model is different than that.

[Chris Best]

Their business model is different than that. And so if we wanted to give people the power of having a direct connection, you know, in the long run, we could make our own app, which we've since done. But at the time, it was Basically, okay, which of these existing apps can you actually have a direct connection with people that people actually already use and do? And I think the only two were email and the podcast, apparently. And email has this very nice property of being transferable. So if you had an existing email list, you could bring it to substack. Also, part of the promise and this was key right from the beginning was you can leave. And so we want to make this thing great. We want to serve you really well. We want to give you enough value that you want to stay here. But part of the reason you can trust us is because there's exit rights. You can go and you can bring your audience with you. And email is sort of like a wonderful. There's a lot of fancy ideas of protocols that would let you do this, but email is the one that actually works in practice.

[Interviewer]

I don't think most people open their email like, what's in here? For me today, I think of email as more of something you are obligated to deal with.

[Chris Best]

I think that actually it helped at the time because you're obligated to check it. So you actually do check it. But then when you're checking it, when there's 10 things that you have to deal with and one really great piece from a writer you love, you're like, well, I have time to read this.

[Interviewer]

How long was it the email only service before there were any other features?

[Chris Best]

We had the web stuff right from the start. And so even from the beginning it wasn't. You could think of it as a paid email newsletter, but it key part of it working was there's a web version. And so the way that it would work is people would share the web version, but they would, once they subscribe, they would stick around and have the direct connection in email. And so pretty quickly we built the ability for anybody to sign up. We built the ability to do free ones as well as paid ones. And then I think probably within a year or two, we got to podcasting features and we started to build other pieces.

[Interviewer]

What did you find as it relates to free versus paid, Size of the audience, conversion rate, and why this maybe

[Chris Best]

gets to the business model question? Because the thing that in our minds differentiates substack is that it is a different fundamental business model, both for the people on the platform and for us. Right. So the way that substack works is you can choose to charge a subscription. Once you charge a subscription, you can still publish stuff for free, or you can publish only to your paid audience. And the only way we make money is by taking a percentage. And so we literally can't make money without the people on the platform succeeding. And we felt like that and still feel like that is sort of like the core the fact that the way you make money is this better way.

[Interviewer]

The only way you make money is if the creator is successful.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, like you make.

[Interviewer]

There's no other way nine times more

[Chris Best]

money than we do. That's just how it works. And that means that we just have a different set of incentives as a platform. We want to encourage people to not just doom scroll and spend their time on it, but to connect with things they actually love enough they might want to pay for. But very early on we took that with too much of a religious fervor and we said we're actually only going to allow paid stuff. If you want to start on substack, you have to charge. And we're not even going to let you send an email to someone for free because that would violate the sanctity of our beautiful idea that we've created. And immediately we realized that was never going to work because the first customer said, okay, well where am I going to send the free ones? And we said, well, it can't be in us. He said, well, I have to do it because it's how the business works, so I'll do it somewhere else. And so we got pulled along by the people who are doing it. It's like, oh, actually the free part is a very important part of the business. Even for people who are focused on paid. You have to have a web version, you have to have these other features. We found the percentage that you can expect varies quite widely. In those early days, we often saw kind of like 5 to 10% of people converting, depending on sort of where your audience was coming from and what sort of pre existing relationship they had with you. Sometimes it'd be much higher, but it was maybe the common theme was it was often much higher than people had expected. And I would say even to this day, people probably slightly overrate the ads business that they could have. And then they dramatically underrate the subscription business they could have.

[AG1 Advertiser]

As nutrition science advanced the throughout through the mid 20th century, researchers began to understand that modern eating patterns, limited variety, processed foods and time constraints could leave small but meaningful gaps in daily micronutrient intake. Today, large population studies confirm that approximately 90% of adults fall short on one or more essential vitamins or minerals. AG1 was formulated in response to those findings. Each daily service serving provides more than 75 vitamins, minerals and whole food source nutrients including vitamins A, C, E, B6, B12, magnesium, zinc, selenium and iodine. A scientifically developed formula backed by nutrition research and delivered in forms the body can readily access because utilization depends on absorption. AG1 also contains probiotics to support gut health and digestive function, helping the body make effective use of what it receives. AG1 contains no gluten or dairy, uses no genetically modified ingredients or artificial sweeteners, and is suitable for a wide range of dietary approaches including plant based paleo, keto and low carbohydrate diets. Available in single serving packets for when you're on the go. Manufactured under strict quality controls, every batch of AG1 is tested to confirm its composition, nutrient levels and the absence of contaminants, ensuring reliability from one serving to the next. It's no wonder AG1 is trusted by the world's top athletes and experts. What was once a futuristic concept, daily nutritional support in a glass, is now the result of applied science. Learn [e-mail] petra do it today.

[Interviewer]

What would you say the state of journalism was when, when you were launching

[Chris Best]

so the traditional press, the business model, was already kind of like feeling this pinch where the Internet changes had swept through. It was sort of in this structural decline. And then for me as a reader, what I felt was there was sort of like a narrowing of perspective and a narrowing of thought where a lot of the things you would read were very predictable and came from the same place. And I felt like that was unsustainable and you couldn't sort of sustain a healthy intellectual culture that way.

[Interviewer]

Do you think it's changed in the years since substack started?

[Chris Best]

Yeah, it's been a time of immense change. I mean, we sort of went through a period, I would say around 2020, where some of those forces kind of came to a head. And there were a bunch of instances where the people who I felt were the most interesting people were often sort of defenestrated from their traditional thrown out, pushed out, like fired, chased out by mobs of people who disagreed with some element of what they were saying, corporate

[Interviewer]

interest, whatever it was, corporate interests or

[Chris Best]

there's there was sort of like a maybe the way I would put it is like the the narrowing of allowable perspectives reached a fever pitch and jettisoned a lot of the original thinkers. Like the people who were least likely to go along to get along were the most likely to get and probably

[Interviewer]

the most interesting people to read, as he said.

[Chris Best]

And a lot of them would start a Substack and instantly make huge amounts of money. I mean, I had this conversation I'd have with. Or I'd say, hey, you should consider starting a substack. You'd make more money. You could have these interesting things. And they'd say, well, sure, I'd love that, but I've committed to stick around at my current place until such and such a time and I want to do right by my editor. And I would say, well, just fuel up your getaway car. You don't have to use it. Just create an account, don't tell anybody about it, try out the editor, play around with it, get comfortable with it. And very often in that time I get a call three days later, you'll never guess what happened. I might actually.

[Interviewer]

Do you know of any people who are mainstream journalists who also have a substack?

[Chris Best]

There's definitely people who maintain free substacks while they are at the mainstream. I think some places have started to take a dimmer view of that. Even Paul Krugman, they told him to blog less, at least according to his substack. He writes these things. Then he has this economics blog that gives him life and he loves doing. And they're like, you have to publish it less frequently. He's like, no. And now he's on substack and he can write whatever he wants and he's making a ton of money and he's able to do the thing that he actually wants, which increases the variance. It's not always the case that not having your editor makes you better, but I think it's. It makes you more fully yourself and that gets more interesting. You know, I think Matt Iglesias was one of the editorial co founders of Vox Media as a reader of his. When he came to substack, it was like Theden after Wormtongue left in the Lord of the Rings. Like he de aged 10 years and regained his vigor and kind of like became more fully himself.

[Interviewer]

Tell me about Barry Weiss.

[Chris Best]

Bari Weiss was very interesting. You know, she was sort of resigned from the New York Times, but after sort of extensive, you know, harassment and mistreatment, at least from from what I saw from the outside, we sort of called her up right away. I was like, you should do a substack. And it took a little while, but she started what at the beginning was bariweiss.substack.com and sort of, you know, had this place where she could start building an audience. You know, there are some people who are sort of independent voices who are artists who go like do their own thing and have their own show. And there are some people who are, I think of as founders, institution builders, people who want to, you know, who believe in institutions to the extent that the existing ones have failed, get hungry to create new ones of their own. And I love when Substack can serve those people. And I think Barry was unquestionably one of those people. She founded that substack, which became the Free Press, which recently sold for $150 million and has become this, like, you know, I would argue, a great cultural force. I think it's really cool.

[Interviewer]

It's really cool that something that left the mainstream, developed anew on Substack, then ends up getting welcomed back into the mainstream almost as a revolutionary change with the idea that maybe all of the mainstream will follow that.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, I think this is often. This is how countercultures work, I think, is that you have things that are sort of the. That start out as sort of rebels or challengers from the outside. It's not that the mainstream becomes the counterculture. It's that the counterculture becomes the mainstream, like the. The upstart, the rival elite, the people who are making the new thing. It. It kind of wins. And I'm sure that Barry feels like she's winning right now. One of the things I always felt was that some of the writers that I respected the most were what you could call heretics and the people who drew the most scorn from the media. It wasn't like, at the time, it wasn't like the complete ideological enemies. It was sort of the people who were within the tribe who dared to criticize it. And, you know, it's easy to kind of, like, lob bombs at your enemies, but it takes a kind of a. A really thick skin to criticize your own side and to raise problems with your own side. And, you know, like, I think Matt Taibbi was an example of this. Those people kind of found opportunity or took refuge in Substack. And the fact that those people were allowed to speak and push back despite controversy against them and against us, I think it's important, and I think it actually helps the side. It helps when you don't silence your critics, because when you can actually have valid criticism aired, even when it's tough, even when it's contentious, that's kind of like how these things move and grow. And so, as much as it was, it's been painful over the years when people freak out about these things. I think it's worthwhile.

[Interviewer]

Would you have imagined someone would quit Working at the New York Times to come write a substack. Was that always in the projection?

[Chris Best]

Yeah, I'd say so. I used to joke with people. It's like, you care about freedom, money, and prestige. I cannot offer you prestige. But the other two. We have those. Part of this was like we just wanted to help people that are making good things make money. And the people that come to substack can make lots of money. That was not surprising. The other kind of cool effect that it's had, though, is that people at those institutions, even the ones that don't leave, they have a lot more leverage. And so there's a lot of people who are making stuff, who've gotten big raises, not because they've come to substack, but because they could go to substack if they wanted to.

[Interviewer]

The threat of substack, the option of

[Chris Best]

substack, let's say the fact that you have this other. There is this other thing you could be doing that gives you this freedom, you know, gives you the sense of having other alternatives as part.

[Interviewer]

That's great. Tell me some of the pivotal moments along the way where something happened and it really created change.

[Chris Best]

At substack, a lot of professional gamblers started their career with a big winning streak. And the reason, of course, is because it's a selection effect. And if you start your professional gambling career with a losing streak, you often don't go on to become a professional gambler.

[Interviewer]

Yes.

[Chris Best]

And I feel like that with that original Bill Bishop launch, like, that thing was wildly successful, and it kind of, like, I would say, gave us a lot of courage. We went and did Y Combinator, which is like a startup accelerator.

[Interviewer]

How was that experience?

[Chris Best]

It was wonderful.

[Interviewer]

What happened when you got there?

[Chris Best]

You walk into a room of a bunch of other people who have this frenetic energy to make something that they really care about. And you get exposed to a culture where that's normal. And not only is it normal, but actually maybe we could raise our ambitions. Maybe there's a bigger version of this thing. I actually think all of that stuff, like the cultural and sociological changes that it does are the main. A big part of the benefit. It gives you an excuse to upend your life. Like, I've been living in, you know, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, building that initial version, and it sort of gave me enough of an excuse to say, okay, I'm going to go move to California for three months and really focus in on building this thing, which was really good.

[Interviewer]

Did you feel a sense of competition with the other people? There or more camaraderie?

[Chris Best]

I would say way more camaraderie. I mean, there's a natural sense in which I'd say it raises your sights a little bit. It's easy. If you have a little bit of early success, you're sort of like, ah, we've got this. And then you look around and even to this day, like, there are more successful companies in that batch than us. Like, some of our friends and peers are just going on to great heights. And it. I think it gives you permission to be more ambitious.

[Interviewer]

That's great. So coming out of the Y Combinator experience, what happened then was that what allowed you to build it in the first place, or.

[Chris Best]

No, no, I'd say we were able to build it. It wasn't simple. It was simple. I sat down and wrote a bunch of the first things I managed to lure. So it was Hamish and I at the start, and then within the first month of ycd, I managed to lure our other co founder, Giraj, to the company, who's a brilliant engineer. That was a really big deal. I think mostly what it did was sort of. It was a commitment device for us to decide, not only are we going to build this, but we're building, like, a really ambitious version of it. And then after that, we sort of, you know, we got going. We had early customers, we had early momentum. The thing was starting to work and we sort of had an idea that we'd raise a Series A at some point. We had some, like, ideas for the metrics, but mostly we were just focused on building the thing. We were focused on getting the best and smartest people to come to the platform and write and make sure they were having a really good experience so that other people would see that and want to do it too. And there was one guy we were trying to recruit named Andrew Chen, who actually had a very successful newsletter about growth for startups. And we were trying to recruit him and trying to recruit him. Basically like, quit your job, come to Substack. But he eventually, instead of doing that, went on to be a partner at Andreessen Horowitz. And he sort of reached back out to us and was like, hey, you should come talk to us. And we're like, no, no, no, we don't have time for that. We're like, yeah, we're heads down, we're building. He's like, well, you know, come for dinner with Mark. Come hang out, like, let's, let's talk. And they ended up sort of like preempting our series A and putting some money in, which was like another shot in the arm, I would say.

[Athletic Nicotine Advertiser]

In a world of artificial highs and harsh stimulants, there is something different, something clean, something precise. Athletic Nicotine. Not the primitive products found behind convenience store counters. Not the aggressive buzz that leaves you jittery, but a careful calibration of clean energy and focused clarity. Athletic Nicotine the lowest dose tobacco free nicotine available. Made entirely in the usa. No artificial sweeteners, just pure purposeful elevation. Athletic Nicotine is a performance nootropic. Athletic Nicotine is a tool for shifting mindsets. Athletic Nicotine is a partner in pursuit of excellence. Slow release, low dose, gradual lift, sustained energy, soft landing, inspired results. Athletic Nicotine More focus, less static. Athletic Nicotine More clarity, less noise. Athletic Nicotine More accuracy, less anxiety. Athletic Nicotine. From top athletes pushing their limits to artists pursuing their vision, Athletic Nicotine offers the lift you've been looking for. Learn [e-mail] Tetra and experience next level performance with athletic nicotine.

[Chris Best]

Warning. This product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical.

[Interviewer]

What are your media consumption habits?

[Chris Best]

My media consumption habits? Now I honestly read a lot of substack. Yeah, partly it's, you know, I can justify it to myself that it's like I'm working and I'm dog fooding and using the product, which is true. And also I love it.

[Interviewer]

I love reading, if you like to read. It's sort of a dream job.

[Chris Best]

It's really good and we're building a lot of parts of the product and I'm very involved in it and I have really strong opinions on it. I would say outside of substack, I read books a bit. I occasionally will watch something on tv but really substack is probably the majority of my media, to be honest.

[Interviewer]

Would you say substack is the antidote to social media?

[Chris Best]

I would say it is the thing that social media can become. It's what social media should have been.

[Interviewer]

When did the app with the scrolling feature begin?

[Chris Best]

So we started working on that several years ago and it was kind of the same story of originally I didn't want to have anything be free. I was like, we're going to be really pure and nothing can be free. And then it turned out that the free thing was an important part of how this worked. And we were sort of like that with the discovery piece, right? We were like, hey, we're going to build an app, but it's going to be purely about long form. It's going to be about only the things you're subscribed to, because that is the core, which was true. But it turned out that as we were building this platform for people to have this direct connection with their audience, one of the most important things they could do was to grow their audience and get in front of new people. And so we were. For a long time, Substack existed in a world where we had these lofty ideas about creating a better incentive structure that would enable better things to flourish. But in practice, if you were writing on Substack, you were still downstream of the existing social media apps. If you were coming from legacy media and you had a massive audience, you could just bring your audience sometimes. But if you wanted to grow, if you wanted to be a new person, you couldn't grow on Substack. You had to go to Twitter or you had to go to Facebook, or you had to go to one of these other platforms. And that was a problem. Both sort of at the science fiction vision level of we're trying to make something different, but we're actually still sort of wedded to this thing. And it was a practical problem, because those companies don't have a particular interest in helping you take your audience and go and own it. And you could have things like, you know, Mark Zuckerberg would decide, we don't want to be in politics for a bit because I was mistreated over the Cambridge Analytica thing, and we're just not going to have politics as much on Facebook. And if you're a political writer, that's a big problem. Or, you know, we got in a spat with Elon around the Totes launch, and so we sort of realized if we wanted to make the fullest version of this thing we were dreaming of, there was a piece that was missing. There has to be a place where you can go and discover things in the world where you can go and, like, be part of a larger conversation. That's a necessary piece of the ecosystem. We were plugging into those pieces that already existed, and that was imperfect, and we wanted to make our own. And we knew that was going to be a crucial thing to do. We also knew it was going to be really hard to do. It's like spinning up a new social network is famously difficult. But we started working at it, and it took a few years, and I would say towards the end of last year, we sort of got it working. When I say working, I don't just mean people are using it and looking at it and spending their time there, but it's generating Massive growth and revenue. People are discovering things that they love enough to pay for, and it's driving a large fraction of people's growth on

[Interviewer]

Substack in some ways, in the version where it was the emails, it was this invisible service that connected the creator to the audience. But now Substack can be more like a community or a bazaar, where you go and find the things that you're interested in. Again, it's like the promise of social media was, but seems to have turned into something else.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, that's right. There ought to be one network that serves the people using it rather than the other way around.

[Interviewer]

Yeah, if it were me, I would probably change the naming so that the app and the scroll is not notes, but that's what Substack is.

[Chris Best]

Yeah.

[Interviewer]

And everything else just feeds substat. And the business model is not based on that. But that's the bazaar where you can find what you're looking for.

[Chris Best]

It does still drive and connect to the business model, though. Because you asked about algorithms, we got to the power of algorithms. The problem of algorithms is that is the same as the power. They're good at whatever you ask them to do. And so if you're a platform that has an algorithmic discovery feed and your goal is to get people to spend the maximum amount of time there, it can be very, very good at that. And if you push that goal to the extreme, it'll end up being good of that in a way that is exclusive of you feeling like you're using your time well or maybe staying sane. And I think more and more people can feel you described as a sensationalism, but it's sort of like it's acting against you. Right. It doesn't have your best interest at heart. It is optimizing you for some end that is not the end that you would pick.

[Interviewer]

Yeah, it's the economy of clicks.

[Chris Best]

It's the economy of clicks. It's the attention economy. And the thing that's different on Substack, it's not perfect, it's not a pennacy, it doesn't solve all the problems. But it's like ultimately the way that we win is by helping you discover something you deeply value to the point where you choose to pay for it. And if I let you sit back on a Sunday and think as my best self, what do I want to spend my time thinking about and reading, and what do I want to support with my dollar to see more of in the world, you might still make a bad choice. It's not perfect, but we've given you that choice. We've put that choice in front of you in a better way that lets you still make a real choice, but it's sort of as your better self in a way that's more congruent with the life you want to live and the person you want to become.

[Interviewer]

It also feels like substack at least started about writers and writing, and Twitter was about text and Instagram was about images. So in some ways, the relationship between Twitter and substack are closer than maybe any other social media because it's about the word. And recently Twitter is prioritizing away from the word and more into videos and more into imagery and other things more like Instagram or TikTok. So for substack to be the home of the word seems like a very good thing, and I'd be wary of owning that segment. That doesn't mean not doing anything else, but knowing that on substack the word is king.

[Chris Best]

I mean, the way I think of this is I think text versus video and image is a real delineation. Another one that I think about a lot is sort of short form versus long form. And in some ways there's more similarity between a long essay and a long thoughtful conversational podcast than between a long essay and like a tweet, let's say. And when I think about letting people make new parts of the culture that matter, I think the other mediums matter too. And the same way that in texts, having space for long form and deeper relationships and those things, I actually think the same is true in audio and video. And there's a lot of overlap between people who want to write and people who want to have a deep conversation. And the same lesson that we've learned through the app, which is actually, if you want to power deep long form reading, the best way to do that is not to only have deep long form reading. It's to also have some ability to have short conversational things, to share quotes, to share pieces, to have the conversation, but then to give you a way into the deep stuff. I actually think the same is true for video as well, but time will tell.

[Interviewer]

What are your thoughts on free speech and what is the current policy at Substack towards free speech?

[Chris Best]

I think free speech and freedom of the press are integral to a free society beyond even sort of substack. I just think it's one of the necessary building blocks of a free society. And on Substack, because this, we've always had this value of independence, of giving people the freedom to make the thing they want to make. We've taken a very strong stance in favor of freedom of the press. You know, you can't organize crimes or make threats or there's a, you know, narrowly construed set of things that you can't do. But beyond that, we try to be very, very liberal.

[Interviewer]

Would you say if it's legal, it could be unsubstacked?

[Chris Best]

Not exactly that, but like, that's sort of. We take a lot of inspiration from the First Amendment, even philosophically.

[Interviewer]

Let's talk about some of the controversies that have centered around Substack over the years. What was the first pushback you felt?

[Chris Best]

Actually, some of the early pushback was just like nervousness around the new model and the fact that people could go independent and write their own thing kind of without the blessing of a media company or institution. Anytime we've had pushback, anytime we've had criticism, I've sort of taken the mindset of, look, if you can't take the heat, don't go in the kitchen. It's like, we set out to do this thing, and the only way that it was going to happen without controversy or without criticism is if we didn't succeed.

[Interviewer]

Yeah.

[Chris Best]

So I can't complain about it too much. There's. There's been times when it's been tough, you know, like, there's people get. Like a very early one was there was sort of, you know, discourse around the trans movement, the trans identity issues about, you know, how we should categorize those things, what should policy be? And that's something that's like a, you know, a very legitimate topic for discussion. It's something that people have good faith, disagreements about. It's also something that some people, it's part of their identity. It's. It's who they are. It's how they feel. Things can feel like very personal or feel like attacks in a way that I deeply empathize with.

[Interviewer]

Substack doesn't have any editorial position, is that correct?

[Chris Best]

We don't have an editorial position. We think that freedom of the press is important. We think that you should have your own editorial position. Your substack has your view, and that we should support freedom of the press, freedom of association. If you don't like that thing, you don't have to subscribe to it. You have the power to remove yourself from it. But there is a school of thought, and I think maybe especially earlier on in Substack's life, there's a school of thought that says that's not enough. Actually, and if you make a platform where somebody can say thing X, Y, z, that is bad or harmful or dangerous or offensive, and you're not actively censoring that or actively taking it down, you are in fact condoning it, but

[Interviewer]

you're not condoning anything on Substack, is that correct? Just to be clear.

[Chris Best]

No, no, just. Just to be clear. It would be, it would, it would be impossible to condone everything on Substack. There's such a wide variety of things of all stripes and types, and I wouldn't want to run a platform that I condone everything on. I don't think that I am qualified for that job. I don't think I'm qualified to be the arbiter of what's true or what's good. And that the people who ask tech platforms like ours to do that sometimes are perhaps well intentioned, but are mistaken in their belief that that's a good thing.

[Interviewer]

I'm not sure that anyone would have the ability to properly police things in a fair way. I don't know that it's possible. And I imagine for every piece on Substack that argues one position, you'll find another writer who might have the opposite position. There's no party line on Substack at all.

[Chris Best]

No. And that's that. That sense of independence is part of the appeal, I think, and it's something that the political winds have shifted since those early days. A lot of people who are critical of us for, you know, platforming people have faced censorship pressures themselves and are now have come sort of come to understand the, the value of a liberal commitment to freedom of the press. I also think there are. I want to sort of give the critics their due here or give the opposing side its due. There's a way you can go about this where if you just said, look, any kind of check on expression is presumptively wrong. And so the only way to actually have freedom of expression is for anybody to be able to say anything they want in any venue at any time. And you kind of like throw the thing fully open. I actually think that can be a trap as well. You can create kind of like a Thunderdome like thing where it's the equivalent of like you being in your living room, people feeling free to come in and shout at you all the time. And you're just like, hey, this doesn't work either. And I think some platforms can kind of like let that dynamic fly too far. So the point of Substack is not that there's no rules. The point of substack is that there's not one set of rules. It's not Chris coming in and saying, here's what everyone's allowed to say. It's like your substack is your house and you get to set the rules and you can have them be quite strict. You can say, we're not allowed to call names here or only Christian things, or only anti Christian things. And that's good, right?

[Interviewer]

Of course.

[Chris Best]

Because I think the thing that we need to show is that you can have freedom and civilization at the same time. It's not the case that the only alternatives are, you know, some centralized power that tells you what it's okay to think and say, or complete anarchy where everybody just shouts at each other. You can, with some structure and with some giving people the right tools and the right power themselves. And you can have something that actually works and is beautiful and that people are free.

[Interviewer]

I remember one in particular. There was a smear campaign early on. Maybe it was in the Atlantic. Does that sound familiar?

[Chris Best]

That one was kind of like right wing content. It was like, hey, there's offensive stuff from the, from the far right. And it's true, there is some far right stuff and there's far left stuff and there's, you know, offensive, offensive things of all. Of all stripes. Well, here's another, like, here's another because there's been a series of controversies of like, why is thing X allowed on substack? One of them was kind of like, what's going on with trans issues? One of them was this kind of, you know, why are you allowing right wing people? But the other one I'm now remembering was, was sort of COVID skepticism, right? There was people who were running the gamut from, you know, are these vaccines good? To like, where did this virus come from? To are the measures we're taking against it the right ones? And there was really, really strong pushback and a strong sort of cultural and sometimes legal thing that was like, you know, you can't let people say this stuff. You can't let people question these things. And we took the position that, like, you gotta let people question. Question this stuff. And I think some of that stuff, you know, in, in my judgment is crankery, right? Like, I think a lot of the. The anti vax stuff is not right and probably does harm and is. Is net bad. And some of it turned out to be right, probably. Like some of the, you know, people who are questioning some of the measures, I think you can, I don't, I don't know if we've resolved the question of where Covid came from, but I think it's at least an open question that's legitimate and to debate and shouldn't be, you know, shut down with accusations of racism or whatever. And that was. Yeah, that was another kind of a moment for me that exposed why this stuff actually matters. You have to let people ask questions. You have to let people challenge the received wisdom, even if they're wrong, even if they're. If they seem crazy. I just think that's like an. A crucial part of a free society. And, you know, substack has been that. We've drawn a lot of criticism for that. Here's another piece of. This is like. I think there's like a. There's a place where I saw a lot of companies go off the rails. I think especially in sort of like, 2020, around that era was like, the way these things would. Would work was there'd be like this, you know, you get like, a social media mob that would show up. Any surface on the Internet that you would open would just have all of these people shrieking at you and telling you you're the worst person and threatening you and all of this stuff. And I think part of what social media does is create a false illusion of consensus. It would feel like everyone was mad at you or everyone hated you, or everyone thought you were. What you're doing was crazy, when really it would be like, there's, like, a couple hundred people that are really ginned up about this. And I think it's very tempting, if that happens to you, to give in and to say, okay, okay, okay, I. I hear you. I'm listening and learning. I'm gonna do this first step to start making this better. And I think as soon as you do that, you are lost. Either you're in control or the mob is in control. And as soon as you, like, let the mob start to be a little bit in control. It's like it devolves and devolves, and nothing satisfies it. And so we. One of the things that we did, you know, and this. It feels this way in the press, and it feels this way when you get these social media things is as painful as it was. We did just sort of hold firm. We wrote a few essays in advance outlining our philosophy about, you know, free speech and freedom of the press and why we were doing what we were doing and why things were the way they were. And we could sort of consult back to, you know, what we had written with cooler heads and then a lot of what I think of as our success was just not giving in, like not getting tilted, just being like, yep, everyone's mad. The people who are our customers, who are concerned, we'll talk to and we'll empathize with them and tell them what we're doing. But we're not going to abdicate our responsibility or our judgment to the critics in the press or to the critics on social media. I think that saved the company, basically. I think being willing to stand up in those moments feels hard, but maybe this is the advice I would give to somebody going through that is like, stick by your principles. If you're going to get smashed, get smashed for doing something you believe in, because that's worth it.

[LMNT Electrolytes Advertiser]

LMNT Element Electrolytes

[Chris Best]

have you ever felt

[LMNT Electrolytes Advertiser]

dehydrated after an intense workout or a long day in the sun? Do you want to maximize your endurance and feel your best? Add Element Electrolytes to your daily routine. Perform better and sleep deeper. Improve your cognitive function. Experience an increase in steady energy with fewer headaches and fewer muscle cramps. Element Electrolytes Drink it in the sauna. Refreshing flavors include grapefruit, citrus, watermelon and chocolate salt. Formulated with the perfect balance of sodium but potassium and magnesium to keep you hydrated and energized throughout the day, these minerals help conduct the electricity that powers your nervous system so you can perform at your very best. Element Electrolytes are sugar free, keto friendly and great tasting. Minerals are the stuff of life. So visit Drink LML and stay salty with Element Electrolyte. LMNT.

[Interviewer]

So tell me all of the features available on Substack now.

[Chris Best]

First of all, you can use Substack just like a normal podcast host. So you can create a substack. You can publish, you know, upload an audio file. It can distribute that to Apple Podcasts and to Spotify. We can also auto publish to YouTube now. And so if you're, if you're just trying to have like a, a good podcast host for free, Substack works for that and you still get the subscription feature so people can still come and give you their email and subscribe. We also have the ability to paywall so you can do a paid subscription and then people can, if they're using their podcast app, they can add their private podcast feed and get the paid version. Now that the app exists though, those things work even better because you can. Anybody who has the Substack app can go to the Like Listen tab and find the things that they're subscribed to that they want to read.

[Interviewer]

Are more people moving over from reading on the email to reading on the app?

[Chris Best]

The app is definitely growing over time, I would say. Yeah. A lot of the most voracious readers are increasingly using the app on each email.

[Interviewer]

Is there a read it in the app tab?

[Chris Best]

Yeah, you can also. I mean, we have a read aloud thing. So as the author, you can read aloud. You can create your own audio version of the post, which I actually love when people do that. Or we have a really good AI one. If you don't do that, or if you just want. If you're in the car, but you want to hear this post, you can do that. The other thing I'm really excited about is we talked about, for writers, the fact that you could come and type into this box and if the thing you type was great, everything else is taken care of. We're working on a set of features that I think will be able to do that for video and audio conversations. The current incarnation of this is Substack Live, where you can go live from the app. And the thesis behind this is we're at the point, with some of these new AI tools, that if you can have a really interesting. You can have something that feels like a FaceTime conversation or a video call, and if you can have the most interesting conversation in the world, we can make all of the other pieces sort of work automatically in a way that's sort of newly good. And I think something may be possible in that realm like it was for writers, where it's like, there are a lot of people who could have a really interesting conversation. But I guess I don't have to tell you that the mechanics of making a really good recording and editing it and having all of those pieces come together, I think the status quo, even today in the world is you either have to sort of be an audio nerd yourself or have a hire a team of audio nerds even to make, you know, forget about a amazing album. But even to make, like an acceptable podcast is pretty difficult. There's still a pretty high barrier there. And I think we're going to be able to dramatically reduce the barrier to the point where anybody who wants to have a conversation and publish a great artifact of it will be able to just do that.

[Interviewer]

And when you say conversation, that means between two people.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, I think conversations, I mean, you don't have to. You could also just sit there and give a monologue to camera. But I think conversation is the much more common and much more natural format for those to be really interesting.

[Interviewer]

What are future features you imagine coming to substack?

[Chris Best]

I mean, we're going to ship some iterations of this video recording live stuff that just make it much more powerful, especially the editing, the ability to make cogent clips. Or the bar for how well a human can do it. That's really good. Is very, very high. But the bar for how good it has to be before it's serviceable for a conversation is actually still fairly high, but is much lower than that. And I think we're going to get to a world where within the next month or two, where anybody who wants to make something that's a podcast or a conversation is going to be able to do that and have it be sort of automatically pretty good.

[Interviewer]

It also seems if AI can beat grandmaster chess players and go players, AI could probably eventually do some of that technical work.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, I think in the limit, it should be able to be really good. There's a more interesting question, which is, do you need the humans at all? Like, why not just listen to the best AI conversation instead of just the inter. Like, why not the interviewer and the interviewee? Which I think is a very deep question.

[Interviewer]

Again, if the content is good, does that matter? I don't know.

[Chris Best]

Does that matter? What does good mean?

[Interviewer]

Any other uses of AI that you're considering or playing with?

[Chris Best]

Lots of little things. We have a rule. We never actually use the word AI in the product. I feel like it's cliche and cursed vibes right now to be like, your AI assistant is going to do the thing. I'm like, oh, God, I hate that. The way that we think of it is, can we make the product more magical? Can we make it magically do the things you want it to do?

[Interviewer]

Are there features that you imagine that would be great, but you have no idea how to do them yet?

[Chris Best]

There's one I think maybe no idea might be too strong. But one thing that I would love just nerdily. So we're building this conversation feature and it's all sort of FaceTime remote calls. I think this, what you and I are doing right now is a thousand times better than that. Just from the sense of having a human conversation. It's a much more technically complicated challenge. If you wanted to say, could we make this be within anybody's reach so they didn't have to be at a studio or didn't have to have special equipment? What would it take to get anybody to have the ability to sit in a room with somebody and have that turn into world Class media. That I think is much harder, but I'm very excited about basically. I think that would be truly magical.

[Interviewer]

Are there possibilities for collaborations with other online businesses like Shopify?

[Chris Best]

I'm pretty interested in that. One thing we have seen that's cool. A lot of people have asked us about various sponsorships and how do these things work. One that has been really cool is this guy Lenny Rachitsky has one of the best substacks and also an interview show about product management and tech. He's kind of like a huge figure in that world and he's done various kinds of sponsorships and things. But one of the things he did is he got a bunch of really high value deals for companies that were sponsoring him and he bundled those into the subscription. So we said, hey, if you're a subscriber to my substack, you're going to get this very valuable year of the pro plan of this thing. He had a bunch of high value software products that he put into the subscription and it was extremely successful.

[Interviewer]

Any moments along the way in the substack story that caused a big bump in use or caused a lot of conversation around substack?

[Chris Best]

There have been some moments like that. I mean we talked about there was sort of the 2020 era where there was sort of like a wider spate of cancellations or shifts in media.

[Interviewer]

Who were some of the people who came over at that time?

[Chris Best]

Andrew Sullivan joined in that time.

[Interviewer]

There was a bunch of people since then. Have there been big bumps in the action?

[Chris Best]

Yeah, there's been. There's been bumps. We had a big thing this year when there was sort of like the TikTok ban drama.

[Interviewer]

I don't know about that.

[Chris Best]

So there was. I think the law might still be that TikTok is supposed to be banned or at least it was at the time. But there was a big moment where it actually did shut down for a day.

[Interviewer]

Oh yeah.

[Chris Best]

And we had a lot of people from TikTok start a substack.

[Interviewer]

TikTok creators would move over to substack.

[Chris Best]

TikTok creators who would. Who maybe didn't even move or just like, I don't know what's happening with this app.

[Interviewer]

Yes.

[Chris Best]

I newly realize how important it is for me to have some way to contact my audience. And what didn't work, I don't think for almost anybody was I'm going to start doing on substack what I did on TikTok. But many people who brought their audience then realized, oh, there's more I can do here. Like, oh, you mean I can write something and people could read it, or I could make a longer thing and people might check it out. That was sort of like a big moment. We've had a lot of interesting controversies. We've had various times where people have been angry that we take a strong stance in favor of freedom of the press and allow various points of view or various things that people disagree with. I expect we'll get like one of those every year or two for the rest of my life if we succeed.

[Interviewer]

Tell me the history with Twitter.

[Chris Best]

So I guess maybe early on in subject history, we were very symbiotic with Twitter in the sense that this was a platform for long form writing. OG Twitter was very, as you say, it was sort of like the short form social network of the literate of people who wanted to read and old Twitter, in my mind, a lot of what people were talking about would be links to long form things. And links performed very well. And a big part of why Twitter became what it became was it was sort of like the place you would go for the headlines. And so in the early days, a lot of those moments where people would come and bring their audience, it would be somebody who had a following on Twitter who would say, hey, I'm starting a substack. Maybe I just got fired or maybe I'm just striking out on my own. You know, come check it out. You could just post a link and it would, all your people would see it and if they were compelled by it, they would come.

[Interviewer]

And it was a different kind of content. It was, I'm going to write a long thing about this. This is where it's going to be. You can find it here.

[Chris Best]

Yeah. And then, you know, the conversation would live on Twitter, but there you could still, you know, you could still have a long form piece of writing.

[Interviewer]

Yes.

[Chris Best]

That would do the rounds. It would be like, oh yeah, everybody's reading this thing, there'd be a conversation about it. And yeah, that was like a major driver in the early days. Over time, and actually even before Elon bought Twitter, that became less and less true. I think as they optimized the algorithm, it ended up penalizing any kind of links out, at least at the start. Not out of any malice, I don't think, but more just. It makes sense given what you're optimizing for. Right. If you're optimizing for time spent scrolling such that you might see an ad, if somebody clicks out to read a thoughtful long form thing, you're losing money. Given the objective function that you might naturally create for that algorithm, those things will penalize. So it became a smaller and smaller share of, like, the top of funnel traffic that was helping people on Substack grow. And then Elon bought Twitter. I talked to him at some point. We were sort of comparing notes.

[Interviewer]

And was he a Substack fan, do you know?

[Chris Best]

I think he was at least a fan of. We, at that point had, I think, been the platform that had taken a pretty strong stance in favor of freedom of the press. A lot of the things that he at least said he espoused.

[Interviewer]

Yes.

[Chris Best]

Were things that we had been doing. And so I think he was sort of, at least theoretically a fan from that perspective.

[Interviewer]

Yeah. Ideologically aligned, yes.

[Chris Best]

Although I would say, given what's happened since, maybe questionably so, but at least on that core idea of like, hey, there just has to be a. There has to be freedom for people to say the things they believe and want to say. He at one point floated the idea of Twitter buying Substack and me coming to run Twitter just as, like, a thought experiment style thing. And when we were about to launch Notes, which is like our feed, I kind of gave him a courtesy heads up. We'd been having this conversation. I was like, hey, we're launching this thing. We think it's important. It's something we've been planning for a while. We're not trying to mess with what you're doing. But we launched it, and he was very upset. He actually asked me not to launch it. He was like, don't launch this thing, basically because he saw it as a Twitter competitor. And I think there was a moment there where there was this meme of, is Twitter actually going to fail? Is this going to tip over? Are people going to switch over to Blue sky, switch over to Threads, or switch over to somewhere else? And so he saw us launching this feed as kind of, I think, a declaration of war. And he banned all mention of Substack on Twitter. There was a week where not only could you not share a Substack link, if you just said the word substack, nobody would see your thing. And if you search for you, literally you'd search for Substack on Twitter, it would say, no results. Doesn't exist. We were like, voldemort. You can't say the name. And that. I think after some backlash, they canceled that policy pretty quickly, but left in place a bunch of kind of like, underhanded things that would hurt traffic. I think Substack in the New York Times were the two sites for a while that got the treatment where you would click on a link and it would go there, but it would delay for five seconds. Like you just click and it would just be like, spin. And five seconds sounds like a short amount of time, but in, you know, software as an eternity.

[Interviewer]

And that wasn't a glitch. That was an intentional.

[Chris Best]

It was. I think it was intentional.

[Interviewer]

Wow.

[Chris Best]

And there was like various debosting and all these things. And I haven't talked to him since.

[Interviewer]

Did anything cause them to get fixed or it just got fixed?

[Chris Best]

I think in the original, like, when he literally, like, he couldn't say the word, I think there was like a general uproar that's like, this is actually ridiculous. Like, you can't be a free speech platform and then ban discussion of a commercial rival that you don't like. And I think that's one of those just like an emotional thing that gets a lot of pushback and you tie it back. But to their credit, one thing that I think has been happening recently is there's been a big discussion about links on Twitter in general. And one of the things that the hardcore users have complained about is this long decline of interesting things linked out. And they're actually testing new features now that help somewhat. And we've seen an increase of traffic in the last few weeks, so I have some optimism that they're working to fix that.

[Narrator/Announcer]

There's a long tradition of reading sacred text slowly, allowing each word to settle, echo, and reveal meaning over time. Rather than rushing to conclusions, this practice invites reflection, listening, and attention. For centuries, this repetition has been used to stay close to wisdom, not by studying words as information, but by receiving them as something lived and experienced over and over again. This tradition is known as lectio divina. Emerging in early monastic life, it engages scripture through four gentle movements. Reading, reflection, repetition, and rest. A short passage is read, a single phrase is held. Silence becomes part of the practice, creating space for insight to surface naturally. Lectio 3365 brings that ancient rhythm into the present moment. Designed for modern life, it offers brief, guided scriptural reflections throughout the day. To begin with intention, pause at midday and wind down at night. The readings are less about information gathering and more for returning to wisdom again and again, letting familiar words meet new moments. A modern way to keep biblical wisdom close, quietly present, steady and alive within everyday life. Lectio365 is a free resource. Find inspiration there now and always. Learn more at lectio365.com.

[Interviewer]

What's different about Substack from Medium or Patreon.

[Chris Best]

So the biggest difference from Medium is the business model. My view of Medium is they took sort of the underpants gnome theory of building one of these things, which is like, step one, get a bunch of attention. Question mark, question mark, question mark. Step three, profit. And so they sort of had this period of trying out a bunch of different business models, one of which was very similar to the substack business model. But through most of Medium's history, there hasn't been any idea of, like, direct connection or ownership as a creator, as a writer. And so, like, on Medium, you'd pay five bucks a month for all of Medium and it would be sort of Netflix style. It would like, give you some slice of the thing if you click on a thing. And what that means is if you're making stuff on Medium, you're kind of like playing to the algorithm all the time to get anywhere. And very early in, when we were still in yc, actually, Medium used to publish. Here's what the top earning writer on Medium made last month. And we would look at it and be like, there's people on Substack that are making more than that, and they're not making more than that because they had the one hit that they could never replicate that happened to get a gajillion clicks and the algorithm doled out a big paycheck. They've got that because they've got a loyal audience of people who value what they do. It's just such a better deal creatively and financially to have some connection with your audience and to have people who are showing up and paying for you. And so I think it was able to attract a much better caliber of writer over time. And then Patreon is very interesting because Patreon is similar in some ways. I've talked to Jack a few times, and I think maybe early on I would have said Patreon was doing the thing where they were trying to be very pure. And they're like, we're really just going to be about the payment relationship. Jack's a musician. He's like, I want to be so creator, you know, focused and friendly that I'm never going to, like, try to impugn on the relationship at all. So we're just going to handle the payment for you, and we're kind of not going to do the rest. And you're not really consuming the content on Patreon. The prototypical thing is you're a musician or you're a YouTuber or you're somebody. And they didn't want to do discovery, they didn't want to help you grow because they felt like it would be sort of tarnishing the pureness of the thing. And I've argued with Jack about that over the years. My view is he's come around to my way of thinking, and they're looking at Substack saying, oh, one of the most important things you can do for creators is help them grow and find an audience, especially new creators, especially the next generation of people who are trying to come up. And now, again, I'm biased, but my view is they're just copying a lot of the things that Substack is doing, which I think are good ideas. But in terms of like having a network, that's a place on the Internet that you go, I don't think Patreon has achieved that yet.

[Interviewer]

Tell me about comments on Substack.

[Chris Best]

You can comment on posts, basically, and you can also reply to the emails from very early on, which is a slightly different thing.

[Interviewer]

What's the difference between commenting and replying?

[Chris Best]

If you reply, it only goes to the author.

[Interviewer]

I see.

[Chris Best]

And if you comment, other people can see it, including the authority.

[Interviewer]

Is that understood? Everyone knows that.

[Chris Best]

I think that's understood. We originally actually had it where replying would leave a comment, and people did not understand that we would end up with a lot of things. We ended up very quickly with a lot of things that were intended to be private that were posted, and we had to cut that out. But the comments are often very good. One of the things you can do is you don't have to, but you have the option to have commenting be only for paying subscribers. And the joke I sometimes use is that people will hate read something, but they won't hate pay for it.

[Narrator/Announcer]

And

[Chris Best]

honestly, if they do hate, if it's like I cared and I hated enough to come and give you my $10 to leave this angry message, well, maybe that's worth it, or maybe that's interesting anyway. But a lot of people on Substack, the value they get from earnest commenters and earnest replies, the feeling of people engaging with the ideas and caring and talking about it, is a big piece of what makes the thing kind of special. And now that the people are in the app, it's much easier to comment. It's much faster. So you're getting a lot more of that. And one thing that I've followed from the early Internet blogosphere is a lot of the most interesting bloggers kind of came out of comment sections a Comment section could be like a popular blog or a popular substack can be its own scene where its own little universe of people that get to know each other and bounce ideas off each other and become known. And then you can sort of get people that kind of grow up in the comment section of one thing and then go out and start their own.

[Interviewer]

Walk me through best practices for substack users.

[Chris Best]

My number one piece of advice I always give people is just start. I think the most common failure mode for somebody who aspires to do a substack is to think really hard about it. Do a lot of planning and a lot of strategizing. And by far the best thing you can do is just it's easy to start, it's free, set it up, put something out there. Don't worry about it being the perfect thing. I also think different people take a different tax with this. But I think a good default is default to creating more more frequently. I think the Internet in general and definitely substack, there's sort of a natural benefit to having sort of less filter and being able to like publish frequently. Putting lots of things out there. You know, if you put 10 things out there and eight of them are kind of so. So and one of them is really great, that works.

[Interviewer]

That's true. Even if it's an email.

[Chris Best]

Like, if you're going to publish more than one thing a day, I might say, you know, pick and choose.

[Interviewer]

Even up to one a day would be not too much.

[Chris Best]

A lot of the most successful subsackers do five a week or more.

[Interviewer]

Yeah, that's interesting. I wouldn't have guessed that.

[Chris Best]

Yeah. I think people are for things they really like. They have a higher tolerance. The other thing I've heard again and again and again from people is I'm so frustrated because this thing that I worked on and polished for a month and put my heart and soul into kind of came out to a flop. It was. People read it, but it was sort of didn't really do anything. And then this one thing that I slapped off in half an hour when I was angry in a parking lot or like I had something that I just kind of like came through me and I just dashed it off. And I wasn't even sure, but I sent it before I even thought about it. And that became the most popular thing I ever did or that became the thing that got everybody into my work, that got them to read the other stuff in the first place. Have you ever heard the story of the two sculptors?

[Interviewer]

I don't Think so.

[Chris Best]

There's two sculpting classes and the teacher for the first class says, okay, at the end of the semester, I'm going to just take your very best piece. 100% of your grade is going to be based on the quality of only the best thing you made. And the other teacher goes to the class and says, I'm going to give you a grade by the pound. The more pounds of sculptures that you make, regardless of quality, that's going to be the grade you get. And in this made up story, what happens is the people in the second class, when you go back and look at the best thing they made, it's

[Interviewer]

much better because of the practice, because

[Chris Best]

of the practice, because of the benefit of momentum and getting going. Because when you set out to only make the one best thing, it can be so paralyzing. And you can spend all of your time polishing this, refining, refining, refining, refining. And in many cases you would have been better served by getting more out and giving yourself the space to like, iterate and to try more things. And sometimes, many times in creative pursuits, I think sometimes those accidents are like the, where the magic happens.

[Interviewer]

Any other tips for creators?

[Chris Best]

I mean, a lot of what we try to do in the product is help people magically get promoted without having to be self promotional. A lot of, especially writers, I find, have this allergy to talking about their work, publicizing it, asking people to look at it. And so we try to do a lot to help make those things kind of happen magically and automatically. But in general, put your link in your bio, share the thing you wrote with people you respect, like it's okay to tell people about the thing you're making.

[Interviewer]

I've heard business people say that Substack could never be a serious media company based on its financial model of only taking 10%. Are you committed to that model being the model going forward as long as you can?

[Chris Best]

Maybe we can't be a successful media company, but we're not trying to be a media company. You know, I think a lot of the most successful media companies of the next decade will be built on Substack. And so the parts that I think are like the core of Substack that we are committed to is the way that people on the platform make money, should be doing the work they believe in. You should be able to make something truly great and be able to make real money in a way that pulls with that rather than against it and that the creators are kind of like in charge of. And Substack should make Money. When they make money, the creator should be getting the large lion's share of the value. Those are kind of core things for us.

[Interviewer]

Is substack about journalism or is it about something else?

[Chris Best]

I wouldn't say it's about journalism. There's a lot of really good journalism on Substack, More, I think, than people sometimes give credit for. But I think it's broader than that. You know, I think it's about culture, ultimately, stories and ideas.

[Interviewer]

Do you think substack's changed journalism?

[Chris Best]

I think substack has helped journalism in a time that's been very fraught for journalism. I think there's a lot of stuff that happens on Substack that is great, that is good journalism that otherwise might not exist. It's been such a challenging time for that profession that I don't know that it's like if that's even the main change that's happened in the past 10 years. But I'm optimistic.

[Interviewer]

Have you seen anything go from substack and bleed into mainstream news? Like something that wouldn't have been in the news had it not been for the substack first?

[Chris Best]

One thing that springs to mind, you know Jonathan Haidt?

[Interviewer]

Yeah, I love Jonathan Haidt.

[Chris Best]

So he started a book on Substack. He started serializing it about, like, social media and phones and all of this stuff. And I think he published a few chapters and he made a thing that eventually became like a bestselling book. I feel like we're probably still in the early beginnings of kind of like what I think of as the. The smartphone backlash or moral panic, depending on your point of view. And a lot of that stuff was cooking on Substack pretty early.

[Interviewer]

The idea of either serializing a book or developing a book on substack, and then eventually someday you get the book. That's a really beautiful idea. I could see how some people would think they undermine each other.

[Chris Best]

Yeah.

[Interviewer]

But it does just the opposite. They amplify each other. It's a fascinating aspect of the Internet age. When you give something away for free on the Internet, it doesn't make it now worthless. It makes it more valuable.

[Chris Best]

Yeah. The same people who read it will buy it again. And in fact, having an email list of people that love to read you is one of the best places to sell a book.

[Interviewer]

That seems like a very clear path to expanding Substack's writer base. Just really making that pitch to as many writers as you possibly can in any way that you can. Because it's a no lose proposition.

[Chris Best]

Yeah, yeah. That's one place that I'd love to expand into. I think the product needs to get better, but serialization and especially fiction, I think there's a lot of room there that we haven't tapped into as much yet.

[Interviewer]

Is there an opportunity to do writer bundles where instead of just subscribing individually to each writer, either you subscribe to five and there's some benefit to doing that, or maybe there are a group of writers who decide to bundle their things together at some advantage to the reader. Is that possible?

[Chris Best]

Yeah, we're running some experiments along these lines now. I find it very interesting. One of the things that fascinates me is we talked about the media company of the future. What is the media company of the future? If you're an ambitious media founder right now, what should you be making? There's one idea that's like, I'm going to make something that's like a newspaper. But there's another case, I think, that says maybe I'll make something that's like a record label, where I'm not trying to create one unified editorial product necessarily, but I'm trying to kind of like spin up and help mentor or make or produce or have this kind of loosely affiliated set of voices that maybe you can get them individually or maybe you can get a bundle. But the enterprise that I'm making, the company that I'm making, is less a singular editorial viewpoint and more kind of like a scene or a collection of people. We're very interested in that right now, and we're testing out some bundle models that are like this, where people can either start a company and make a bundle or kind of group together into a bundle and see if that helps. I've thought about this a fair amount. I think there is a way to do it that would be bad. I think if we literally just did the medium thing where it says, look, just pay one price and you'll just get everything. I think that does undercut the relationship, but. But I think there are other ways you can go about doing some bundling stuff that doesn't undercut it, and we're playing with those.

[Interviewer]

As it becomes more and more of a hub of substack, being meaningful as a discovery engine feels like it plays into that side of it.

[Chris Best]

We're starting to see that matter for writers and creators, too. People are coming to substack. It used to be like, you know, no one's ever heard of this, but I hear people are making money. And now there's people that come that are like, all of the interesting things I read are here, and I feel like if I'm not here, I'm sort of. I'm not even in the conversations that I find most interesting.

[Interviewer]

What are the most popular genres on substack?

[Chris Best]

They kind of change over time. We have these eras, but there was a long time when it was kind of like the sort of the heterodox, you know, the Bari Weiss axis. There was like a period where that people thought of substack as that, you know, the right wing of the left, mainstream kind of. You know, we went through a whole bitcoin era where a lot of the. There's like a bitcoin rally and there was a huge segment of crypto stuff. We're in kind of the. You know, Kamala Harris has a substack now. We've got kind of like the. I would say the. The mainstream Democrat universe is, like, thriving on substack in 2025. We've had these eras, and at any given time, it's tempting for people to, like, think that the current flourishing that's happening on substack is the whole platform. But the reality is that it's this index fund of culture. It's got all these different things, and it changes all the time, which makes it fun.

[Interviewer]

What accounts do you read or what are your favorite accounts?

[Chris Best]

There's a lot that are very good. I mean, one that is kind of special to me is Astral Codex 10, Scott Alexander. He's sort of a rationalist and essayist and thinker in the weird Berkeley rationalist scene. But he's somebody that I've been reading for a long time that I really like.

[Interviewer]

What is Substack Defender?

[Chris Best]

Substack Defender. Oh, man. So we had a thing that kept happening because you'd have these especially, like, local journalism. This happened a lot where somebody would be covering a local business or politician negatively, and they'd be some independent person that's just trying to. Maybe there's no local newspaper anymore, but they're taking up the thing and they'd write some negative story and they would get a really scary letter on legal letterhead that basically says, we're going to ruin your life unless you shut up. I mean, there's very strong legal protections for journalism and speech and criticism in this country. And so very often these were just bogus claims or claims that did not have a very strong chance of actually winning in court. But the ability to make the threat, if you're an independent person can be kind of debilitating, because even if you defend. Even just the cost of defending yourself can be very high. And you don't really know how are they going to be able to find something or what is this thing? And so we created this program called Substack Defender that was basically like, we're going to have a fund for picking up defenses of these things that anybody can apply to. We'll pick which ones we take and we're going to pick a few things like this where somebody is kind of trying to do censorship by lawfare. I think of it just like really vigorously defend it and put a bunch of weight behind it, put a bunch of money behind it, try to like, you know, publicize it if necessary. Because the imbalance was if you're some business person or government person, it's basically free for you to send a scary, scarygram. Yeah, there's no real cost to you. It's cheap to get a lawyer. You pay a lawyer, they write up a meanly worded thing. You send it to somebody, it makes them afraid to do the work. But when you do that, there's a chance that there's a very well funded legal NPR defense that swings to their aid suddenly that can tip the balance of power back in favor. And by doing even a relatively small number of those, you can help create a climate where it's not costless to harass journalists.

[Interviewer]

That's great.

[Chris Best]

We've won a few of those. It's very satisfying. Tetragrammaton is a podcast. Tetragrammaton is a website. Tetragrammaton is a whole world of knowledge.

[Athletic Nicotine Advertiser]

Fall within the sphere of Tetragrammaton. Counterculture, Tetragrammation Sacred geometry Tetragrammatin the avant garde Tetragrammatin Generative art Tetragrammatin the tarot Tetragrammatin out of print music Tetragrammatin Biodynamics Tetragrammatin Graphic design Tetragrammatin Mythology and magic Tetragrammatin obscure film Tetra Tetragrammatin beach culture Tetragrammatin Esoteric lectures Tetragrammatin off the grid living Tetragrammatin Alt spirituality Tetragrammatin the canon of fine objects Tetragrammatin Muscle cars Tetragrammatin Ancient wisdom for a new age. Upon entering, experience the artwork of the day. Take a breath and see where you are drawn.