Vince (3:34)

I think, I think it's kind of interesting because as soon as he went to the forefront and I did a little research, he came across as historically a policy hawk when he was with Obama. And then the pushback was, he isn't a hawk, he's a real politic person. And then you started seeing some interviews with him saying that he was very dovish. And I went, okay, so this guy is basically, he goes with the flow. And then the markets kept selling off. And I said, well, don't they get the message? So I guess the market doesn't believe that he's as dovish as they think. Or maybe it's reacting to the fact that they think the Fed actually does have to hike. I don't know, but it certainly seems to be spreading. You know, it started out just as tech stocks, and now there's other stocks involved. And, you know, bitcoin took a dip, stabilized, another dip. You know, I mean, I, I bought today, to be clear, just because I see big money buying and small money selling, and I have a feeling that I might have to hold onto this for a year as a trade. But, you know, I added to a position today. And then you have China. What the hell is going on in China? I'm getting the impression that they're stagnating again. And all this is coming out after Japan has a rate problem because their currency's dropping and it doesn't stop. So usually this is the alarm bell for me. Usually when we can't, you and I collectively can't get a handle on why something is going down. Like, in general, the market itself is tech stocks, for example, and nothing is slowing it down. I'm under the impression that there's something else going on that we don't see, and I don't know what that is. I can't see any more bad news that has to come into this market. You know, it's, you know, the war in the Middle east is continuing, the war in Ukraine is continuing. Trump is in the process of backing off of tariffs Maybe he needs to back off of tariffs a little bit harder for this market to stabilize. But for the life of me, I can't figure out. I mean, I can figure it out. I just don't like my reason for Bitcoin not benefiting from the, from the disinvestment in gold. Not that I think it should be one to one. I just think there should be some money going into Bitcoin. It's kind of like, you know, disappointing, especially with all the money flowing into Ethereum. And Ethereum's not moving either. Yeah.

Host (Possibly Marty) (6:24)

I'm not sure if you followed the event on October 10 last year in the bitcoin and broader crypto markets, but there was an API problem with Binance specifically that blew up. I mean, the story is that it blew up a number of market makers, which in turn messed up.

Vince (6:45)

I did follow.

Host (Possibly Marty) (6:46)

So I think there's some people that saying that the blowback in the aftermath of October 10th is still lingering in the market in the sense that market makers haven't had the confidence to come back and bring liquidity profile to the market. I could see that being the case. Yeah. I don't know.

Vince (7:03)

They're not stepping into the breach.

Host (Possibly Marty) (7:05)

I'm not sure what it is, but.

Vince (7:08)

Yeah, I don't, I don't buy the microstrategy stuff. I mean, I'm not a fan of his approach, but I don't buy that as being a problem. I buy the problem as being a lack of liquidity and I. It sounds like indirectly we're lining up with the same ideas. Somebody's not doing what they're supposed to do. As a market maker.

Host (Possibly Marty) (7:29)

We were mentioning before we hit record, but bringing the focus back to China, there's a particular, would you say a long only fund for gold there specifically.

Vince (7:39)

Oh yeah, yeah. This is actually very interesting and there's really no one that's covering this, but it's correct and it's why we're doing what we're doing, meaning whipping up and whipping down. If you're reading the mainstream media, what you're going to see is truthful arguments. But they're saying speculators first of all. I mean, just in case people aren't familiar with it. Silver and gold together, but silver more exaggerated, spiked to the highs last week and now it's getting slaughtered. And the reason it's being given is unhealthy speculation, momentum trading. And there's truth in that. If you're looking at the Chinese speculators, but in the US there's no Speculation. Right now there's very little speculation. And what's really going on is China has a faulty market structure. Now bitcoin people have to know this. Bitcoin people have seen this with, with faulty ETFs, with Mt. Gox and all that shit that you dealt with over the years. But it's kind of like this. China has a very closed market structure. And so you can trade futures, but not everybody can trade futures. You have to have your money in a futures account. Most people will look for exposure in a stock investment just like in the US and they'll put it in a fund or an ETF type of product that gives them exposure. Now silver has been rallying for good reason, related to multiple reasons, but all of them are fundamental. Gold's been being bought by central banks and silver's being bought because what's happened is gold's gone up so much that people are looking at silver going, well, maybe that's cheap, maybe I should buy some silver. And what they're doing is they're piling into silver now at the same time that industrial demand is picking up for solar panels. The reason China is the problem, and I'm not saying this politically or geopolitically, is because they have a product out there called the SDIC Fund. They only have one equity product for exposure into silver and that product is a long only fund. So it's not truly an etf. You can't short it. So if you want to buy exposure in silver, you buy it. Now all that guy can do is buy futures to parallel how much money has flowed into it, not the price of it. So if silver rallies a percentage point and you and I are, you know, the Wongs, and we're out there, we're going, I want to have silver exposure. Your choices are limited. And so you throw your money into this SDIC fund and it goes up 2% and then it goes up and then. So that attracts people going, that was up even more than silver. Maybe we should buy that. It starts behaving like a leveraged etf. And it has no right to do that now. There's no one out there keeping a lid on it by shorting it and buying the futures. There's no arbitrage, it's a long only fund, you can't sell it. And so this thing, which by the way is the perfect vehicle to get a market higher because the money stays in that fund, it doesn't go out and it's just kind of like bottled up critical mass, you know what I mean, and this thing gets out of control and what happens, staying focused only on China is China. 85% of the solar panels that go into Europe are sold to them by China. And solar panels use silver, and India probably does the other 15%. But their appetite for silver has been just voracious for the last two years. Going back to right after the first silver squeeze that they called it, the second silver squeeze, I should say. And what happened was the industrial demand was getting front run by the US ETF demand. They usually like to buy during US Hours because we're dummies and we sell it all the time. Right? Then it's going out to China. Now you've got this long only fund that people are going, oh, look at that, it's going up 2%, let's buy it. And so they're buying it. And the Chinese market structure is such that there's no silver available for them locally. So they have been depending on a lot of imported silver over the years. And this is where it gets interesting. While all this is going on, all this snowball effect is going on. The United States finally figures out that its supply chains don't work, that it can't get silver or copper or anything else it needs to build its power grid back. So it says, wait a minute, we have to start getting raw silver. We have to start getting finished copper. We have raw copper. So how do we do that? Well, we do that by going into Latin America and saying, give us what you got. Latin America for the last 10 years has been selling it to China and they still have plenty of it, but China's like their customer now. And so what do we do? Trump comes out with his Monroe Doctrine, basically, and he says, china out of Latin America now, I can confirm this. You had Josh Farrell on last week, and he and I have had conversations from different perspectives. He's boots on the ground fundamentalist, and I'm boots on the ground financial. And he said to me that he was on a trip recently and he bumped into some military personnel in the Caribbean and they told him that they're there now to minimize Chinese influence over Latin American commerce. I was like, whoa, that makes sense. Then I saw in the marketplace, JP Morgan starting to take in silver concentrate, which is basically raw silver. And when you take those two things and combine it with China, that means China is not getting its raw silver. That means China is getting squeezed. That means China needs to buy it. And if they want to sell their solar panels. And so they started to get short squeezed over there. You know, their industry needs to buy, plus they had some short funds that needed to buy it. And then come Thanksgiving, we talk, I think, after this. But then come Thanksgiving, JP Morgan, which has a bunch of silver available in the comex, gets it pulled by China and JP Morgan says, no, we're not giving it to you. So China is now naked short. The US has cut off their supply chain. We've just gone in and basically invaded Venezuela and deposed the leader, Maduro. I think China's a little bit stressed. And so their industrial business started to buy the silver and there's a spread. It's kind of like when you trade bitcoin on two different exchanges. Back in the day, you'd have different prices on Binance versus Kraken or what have you. Well, Shanghai is trading 110 and COMEX is trading 100. And you can't buy one on an exchange and sell it to the other because it's physical. You got to transfer. It's not that easy to do. Financials are broken down. You're tariffing me, I'm tariffing you. We can't do paper arbitrage. And before you know it, someone in China gets their ass handed to them and it spikes and then it magically ends overnight. So now the market comes off. They're finding this. They find the silver is what I said. And the Chinese speculators who are being blamed for this are really a function of the government having these ridiculous products out there that are imperfect. Kind of like the. What was the name of the fund? The grayscale fund. That's futures. I mean, it wasn't as obvious that that was a big problem, but same idea. So China has pretty much gone on a buying binge of precious metals for the last three years and they finally caught someone cheating and lying. It's going to be just like any other scandal. You're going to find out that people were selling silver they didn't have kind of like, you know, the custody and rehypothecation issues that are going on in crypto now. Same idea. So I think the market's done for now. I mean, I don't want to give you a directional prediction except to say that it's gone from being overbought to being oversold in three days. Do I think it's going to go up from here? No, I think it's going to go down from here. No. I'll just reiterate what Josh said. Between 50 and 150 or more likely between 60 and 110. I don't think it's going to go back up to 110. But the fundamental problem isn't solved yet. They still don't have the silver that they need in the future. And America has pretty much started hoarding it with the critical mineral status. And the result of that will be, as Josh had said, nine months out there's no silver for Europe. And I checked the Bloomberg forward rates and nine months out, the forward rates for gold and silver are higher. So there's people that are worried about future supply. It'll be almost like if the having didn't happen, you know, they're dependent on that supply and it's not there. So that's the long winded version, but hopefully that helps.

Host (Possibly Marty) (17:06)

Yeah, definitely paints a better picture. I mean you have the mechanical side of the issue which you just described. But then even last week the, the social side was really beginning to send alarm bells to me. I mean just both charts were parabolas. And then you have people in line. I had a buddy in the bitcoin space, he's in Australia and he wrote a tweet thread about, he was like, okay, I've hit my target so I'm going to take my risk off the table. And went to like a physical dealer shop to sell some of his silver. And the line was out the door and people were talking about how they were up 100% on the trades they made three weeks before. Oh yeah, you had the maniac aspect of it lean in full bore.

Vince (17:54)

I mean, you guys joke about the, about the boomers fawning, making money in silver, that jokes that meme is real silver hit $50 and gray haired guys were lining up. So I was getting calls. How about this? I was getting calls when Silver was trading 70 on the way up and dealers were calling me up saying I just got a bunch of junk. And for those of you that aren't familiar with junk, junk is pre1965 coins, which are 90% silver and they trade at 90% of the silver weight. And we're talking about, you know, talking about $100 in $400 in quarters that's worth thousands of dollars, you know, like tens of thousands of dollars. So quarters a quarter is worth $70 at that. one point it was like that because it was almost an ounce or a little bit less than an ounce. 90% of $70. When it was trading $100. A 1964 quarter was worth $70. That's insane. And you and I look at it, we go, that's insane. But meanwhile, it happened and it persisted for a little period of time. Well, during that time frame, everyone over the age of 60, over the age of 70, with bags of coins in their basement were going through them and bringing them and dumping them on the lap of all these dealers here. What will you give me for this? And they were buying it, like $10 under spot. Because these are older people. They're getting advantage taken of them. Maybe they don't know. And I started getting calls during this time. Hey, Vince, are you in the market for silver? I'm like, nope, not buying right now. I'm trading it. I'm long. It's. But I'm not buying physical right here. Well, I got some. I got some. I got some junk coins. I'm like, yeah, okay, I don't want junk coins. I don't own a refinery, but I understand the merit in them. He goes, well, I'll give it to you at $3 on their spot. And I'm like, whoa, that's cheap. I'm like, all right, fine, I'll take some. Then the next day, silver trading 95. And I go, do you still have any of those coins left? He goes, yeah, I do. I'm like, really? Why isn't anyone buying these? And he said it to me. He said, because they won't stop coming in the door. All these old people are coming and going, here's my quarters. Can I have some cash? Can I have some cash? If only they were young enough to buy Bitcoin, I guess, right? But they're selling liquid, like the meme is real. It's real. But then something weird happened, and I almost got frothy myself. It broke 105. And I called the guy up. I go, you still have those coins? No, but what happened? He goes, everybody cleaned them out just yesterday. And I went. So at that point, he said to me. I didn't say it to him. He said to me, we are in the FOMO stage now. We are in the froth now. Because when people are calling him up, because I call up and check, he's like, people were calling me up going, buy more, buy more. He goes, that they thought it was over $100. It's never going to go back down again. And sure enough, he was right. That was the top. His name was Brian. That was the top. He was right about that. Brian Kuzmar. So anyway, it's a shit show. It's like. It's like any other media, you know.

Host (Possibly Marty) (21:08)

That'S why it's Funny, then you had all the silver influencers on that same. We're going to 150, we're going to 200, we're getting back to the gold silver ratio of years past. So it's at least got to go to 500 eventually. And I don't know, gravity, just looking at the chart, gravity has to set in at some point.

Vince (21:30)

Oh, yeah, yeah. I mean, The argument of silver going to $500, I don't buy into because I haven't really heard an argument. I just heard a price prediction. The argument of silver going to 200 or $300, I do buy into, but not tomorrow. And the reason I buy into it is real simple. If you go back and you look at what happens to any mineral when the US puts it on a critical minerals list, using lithium and uranium as the examples, when they get put on the list within five years, they triple in value. And when silver was put on the critical mineral list, it was worth $40, but it triples in five years. This tripled essentially in five months, right? What's that? August, September, October, November, December. Five months. I mean, that's insane, right? So for me, as a trader who says I actually handicapped this, I said silver should go to $143 within 50 months. That was my math. Soon as they made it critical minerals, I went, all right, lithium is the home run. Uranium is a little bit less of a home run. I'll average the home runs $143 in 50 months. So I bought it and then it goes to $80 in three months. And I go, okay, maybe it's going to shoot to 200, then back down to 140, but this is goofy. Goes up to 120 and that's the end of it. That's the complete end of it. And so if you say to me, do you think it'd go to 200, $300 over the next five years? I'm like, yeah, absolutely. I think it's going to happen in the next five minutes. No, this market is ridiculously overbought. And everybody's so smart about that now. But you know, I have a lot of subscribers that wanted it to go even higher. And I kept saying to them, don't buy it anymore. Take profits. Don't sell your physical, Sell paper if you have to. Don't buy it. And you know, it turned out to be wrong for two weeks. But when it's right, man, it's horrible. You know how it is.

Host (Possibly Marty) (23:34)

Sup, freaks? If you've been listening for a while.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (23:36)

You've probably heard us all talk about BitKey. It's a Bitcoin wallet built for people.

Host (Possibly Marty) (23:40)

Who want self custody to actually fit into their lives.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (23:42)

Bitkey is a private multi sig wallet.

Host (Possibly Marty) (23:44)

That removes the biggest point of failure in traditional self custody. The seed phrase. No ceremony, nothing to hide, and no single mistake that can put your bitcoin at risk.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (23:51)

We all know things get lost. I lose things all the time.

Host (Possibly Marty) (23:54)

Phones get replaced.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (23:55)

Life happens. Bitkey specifically is designed so your bitcoin stays secure and recoverable without demanding constant attention or expertise. Because it's built for the long term, inheritance is built in so your bitcoin.

Host (Possibly Marty) (24:05)

Can move securely into the next generation.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (24:07)

It's bitcoin self custody built for real life. And for February only for you freaks.

Host (Possibly Marty) (24:11)

Okay, February only.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (24:12)

You got 28 days.

Host (Possibly Marty) (24:13)

Not a leap year.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (24:14)

I'm pretty sure.

Host (Possibly Marty) (24:14)

28 days. You listeners TFTC listeners can get BitKey.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (24:18)

For $99 using code TFTC99 at BitKey World. That's Bit K E Y World. Use the code TFTC99 and you're going.

Host (Possibly Marty) (24:28)

To get a bit key for $99. Sup freaks? This rip is brought to you by good friends at Silent. Silent creates everyday Faraday gear that protects your hardware. We're in bitcoin. We have a lot of hardware that we need to secure your wallet. Emits signals that can leave you vulnerable. You want to pick up silence gear, put your hardware in that. I have a tap signer right here. I got the silent cardholder replace my wallet. I was using Ridge wallet because it's secured against RFID signal jacking. Silent. The cardholder does the same thing. Much sleeker, fits in my pocket, much easier. I also have the Faraday phone sleeve which you can put a hardware wallet in. We're actually using it for our keys at the house too. There's been a lot of robberies. They have essential Faraday slings, Faraday backpacks. It's a bitcoin company. They're running on a bitcoin standard. They have a bitcoin treasury. They accept bitcoin via strike. So go to slnt.com tftc to get 15% off anything or simply just use the code tftc when shopping@slnt.com Patented technology, special operations approved, has free shipping as well. So go check it out. Well, shifting this back to the geopolitics of the day, I think that's the big question. And pulling wash into this. The Monroe Doctrine, the Don Row doctrine as well. I think Warsh is a particularly interesting pick considering the fact that he's basically an understudy of Stan Druckenmiller, who Secretary Bessant has worked with as well in the past. And obviously we've had this for saber rattling from Trump for two years about consolidating treasury and Fed policy. And it seems like Kevin Warsh is the guy that will will go affect that policy, since him and Scott Besson are very close and have the same same sort of market teacher in their careers. And it seems like we're going to have a consolidated front between the Fed and the treasury, which will have geopolitical implications. And I think Scott Besant said it publicly a few weeks ago, what was the most surprising part of taking the treasury job. And it was national security, which geopolitics plays into. So what's your view on how things are being set up on the geopolitical side of things right now?

Vince (26:41)

Well, starting with your savvy comment about the whole Soros Druckenmiller relationship, it's like Druckenmiller's got his buddies in there now, Warsh and Besson, geopolitically as it manifests locally, there's a very clear thread about the point you brought up there, and that is the world is deglobalizing. And because the world is deglobalizing without getting into the minutiae of it, when the world was globalized, the Fed was the most important part because monetary policy allowed us to reach out into other countries. Fiscal policy is tax and spend at home. The fiscal policy is essentially tax and spend, and monetary policy is print and distribute. So monetary policy is the network, fiscal policy is the money. So as the world deglobalizes, and you can see this in the personalities of the leaders being hired, they're regional leaders, they're nationalistic, they're more conservative, they're less worried about Kumbaya all over the world. They're more interested in their own national priorities. Well, as that happens, all these countries we all know are fixing their supply chains, fine. But what we don't talk about is they're fixing their money chains, which is their payment rails, which is their payment chains. And those are equally important for a different reason. So I'm a country in Europe. Italy is a good example. Italy's got fragile supply chains. It depended on China, it depended on Europe, it depended on Africa, depended on the US and so they're working on those, getting those fixed up. We need to get our this from there, energy from there, energy from there but also monetarily, they recognize that they have to build their own military, they have to build their own infrastructure. And you don't do that with monetary policy. You do that with fiscal policy. You raise taxes or what have you, but when you do that, you make your central banker less important. And in fact, they've gotten so adamant in this that they've said to their central bank, that goal that you're holding, they hold onto their gold at the central bank level. We don't do that here. That gold that you're holding on to, that's ours, give it back. So essentially their treasury said to central bank, give us the gold back. In the US as you rightly bring up, the subordination of the Fed to the treasury is happening. The Fed will either fold into the treasury or. You know what, now that I'm thinking about this. Yeah, this is a good point. This is a good point because of what you brought up. If the Fed gets subordinated to the treasury, becomes more dependent on it, becomes more beholden to it, then the Fed becomes the brake. The fiscal side is we're going to print money, but we're going to give it to this industry and that industry and this industry and that industry, as opposed to the Fed printing money just raining money on everyone in Q8. So what you have now is you have Bessant saying we need to print money, it needs to go that industry, defense, infrastructure, power grids, things like that, as opposed to the Fed just printing money and saying it goes where it goes. So the subordination of the Fed to the treasury is a symptom of the geopolitical changes that are coming on. And that is monetary policy doesn't matter. We can't influence people's economies with monetary policy as much as anymore, and we've got to take care of home. So I think it's possible, coming back to your point, it's quite possible that the market is looking at this, saying the punch bowl is really over. Maybe Wash isn't a hawk, but if Bessant's in control, maybe we're going to be raising rates. So I think, I think that's a valid argument that we should think about. Maybe the party is over.

Host (Possibly Marty) (30:51)

I've recorded a recap episode of the fund. I'm a partner at 10:30. One of our principals there, John Arnold, he writes a weekly recap and this week was focused on the Warsh nomination and dissecting his views on Fed policy and what he would do. And he's explicitly said, hey, I would like to bring rates down lower, but I don't want to expand the monetary base. And I think that's right. All well and good to think about, but structurally, is it actually possible? Like, you're just gonna.

Vince (31:28)

Is Sean Arnold on your board? No, it's not.

Host (Possibly Marty) (31:31)

It's not the. It's the real John Arnold. It's not John Arnold from the John Arnold Foundation. The. The billionaire commodities trader. It's another one.

Vince (31:41)

No, I say that because I could have given you a John Arnold story about how he picked my pocket for Superman.

Host (Possibly Marty) (31:47)

Did he? Well, take it here. It's not the John Arnold I'm talking about.

Vince (31:50)

So. All right, I'm referring to John Arnold. I mean, this is actually a pretty funny story because this is a nightmare for me that I survived. So I'll give you a training story here. During the early 0's 01 02, there were natural gas problems. There was hurricane season, There was winter coming up. And the October contract and the March contract are the two contracts that get the most volatile. And there were these very exotic options called spread options. So March versus April, the spread itself can be very volatile. And I was the market maker. I was the designated market maker in this product on the 9 max floor. And they were extremely complex and very difficult to trade. Even like trading options on crack spreads. It'd be like trading options in two commodities, like crack spreads, you know, heating oil versus gasoline and what have you. But the two months that this customer picked, I didn't know who the customer was at the time. This customer picked was March, April. And these months are typically very dangerous. March is the end of the winter. And if it's a cold winter, March explodes. And April's the beginning of the summer. And nobody ever wants April. So there's a seasonality like March, April. Nobody cares about it. And at the time, March and April were kind of like right here. Nothing was going on. And so here I am selling these calls to some guy, some guy, you know, on the floor. But I'm like, I'm 80% of the liquidity and he's got a huge position. And then, don't you know it? Cold snap, market rallies. Now I'm losing my ass. Okay, I don't know it's John Arnold yet, but it is John Arnold. I'm losing my ass. He was running Centaurus at the time, and he had just crushed Brian Hunter at Amaranth. I knew people at Amaranth as well. Anyway, so natural gas starts to rip. I panic, the good panic, and I cover my risk. I Don't I still have these stupid options on you can't get out of there. Like a roach motel, you know? And I knew who John Arnold was. He was respected, he was legitimate. And he was an ethical massive trader in natural gas. And you always wanted to know if you traded with him because he was going to be right and you better over hedge. But I didn't know I traded with him. So the markets on the highs, I actually turn a profit, a big profit, you know, easily seven figures, put it that way. And I decide to get out of half of my risk, which means I need to go back to that customer and get him to give me the other half of my risk. So I turned to the broker. This is a floor at the time. I turn to the broker and I go, hey, that customer of yours that bought all those March April calls from me, calls. They were bullish calls. I go, call him up. I want to buy them back. They're worthless at this point. They already done their work. Call him up. I want them back. Guy calls him up, Vince, I got him on the phone. He says he doesn't want to get rid of him now. I'm kind of panicking. I'm like, why? Why? He goes, because he turned them into puts, which meant he's now bearish. And so apparently they say my face turned green and then white. I'm like, who's your customer? And he went, well, I shouldn't say who it is, but it's the guy named after the bakery, Arnold Bread. And I go. And I looked at him, I said, centaurus. He goes, yeah. I go. I turned around and I went into the ring and I panicked. And I bought everything that I had to get back to cover my position. And I lost everything that week. Everything. I completely lost everything that week because the market went down. And he actually said on the phone, this is a nice guy. He's sorry, but he really needs them. You know, I know that he meant that he probably was screwing me over a little bit too. But that's okay. He's. He's a good trader, and I respected that. Anyway, so they carried me out on a stretcher a week later because of John Arnold. So when you said his name, I immediately had PTSD flashbacks, like John Arnold. But anyway, that's it. That's. I just wanted to mention that to you. It's a good story. It's a funny story because. Because I'm still alive to talk about. But I lost. I lost seven figures that I had made and then lost seven figures So I went from, let's say I'll make a number up 2 million to down 1 million in three days. It was a complete disaster.

Host (Possibly Marty) (36:35)

That's a whipsaw.

Vince (36:36)

I almost.

Host (Possibly Marty) (36:38)

I mean, a lesson in survivability too short term. I mean, maybe some lessons for people out there just got wiped out this week. Whether it's in bitcoin gold or sil. It's long.

Vince (36:48)

I know, right? I mean, I got lucky. I got lucky to survive that. But I'll never forget that because I knew who he was. And I'm like. And I'm like, he's not a dick. If he's not selling them to me, then maybe he means it. And I went, all right, I'll go in the ring and I'll start covering. What's Vince know? What's he know? Like, people were freaking out. What does he know? I'll tell you what I know. I'm going to lose my ass if I don't do this. And of course, I lost my ass anyway.

Host (Possibly Marty) (37:15)

So our John Arnold has a good. A good story too. He used to work at Citadel for Ken Griffin. He's told us publicly, so I think he's comfortable with me sharing it. But he gets an email one day from Ken Griffin's executive assistant, like, hey, Ken wants to talk to you. And at the time, he's like a low level analyst, lower level analyst at Citadel. And he's like, oh, God, the big boss wants to talk to me. I'm like, ask the executive assistant. Like, are you sure? He's like, yeah, he wants to talk to John Arnold. Here's his number. Give him a call. So he calls him up and Ken Griffin's like, hey, John, like, what do you think about this? This gala next week? And our John Arnold's like, let me, like, doing research, trying to answer on the go. And then like 30 seconds into the call, Ken realizes it's not the John Arnold that you were telling a story about and says, oh, I gotta go somewhere.

Vince (38:11)

Oh, my God, that's funny. That's. He probably gets. It's like being named Michael Jordan.

Host (Possibly Marty) (38:16)

I have an uncle that's a similar situation.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (38:20)

Sup, freaks? When you take bitcoin seriously, you start with custody. You want to control your keys, avoid single points of failure, and make sure your savings cannot disappear because you or someone else screwed up. That is what Unchained has been focused on since 2016. Unchained is the leader in collaborative multi sig custody in bitcoin financial services that keep you in control. They secure over $12 billion in Bitcoin for more than 12,000 clients. That means about one out of every 200 Bitcoin sits inside an unchained vault. Their model is simple. You hold two keys, they hold one key. It always takes two keys to move bitcoin, meaning their single key can't access.

Host (Possibly Marty) (38:49)

Your bitcoin on its own.

Sponsor/Ad Voice (38:50)

Just resilient shared custody that gives you institutional grade security while keeping you sovereign. Unchained also lets you trade straight from your vault, access bitcoin backed commercial loans, open a bitcoin IRA where you hold your own keys and set up personal business, trust or retirement vaults. They even offer inheritance solutions built for long term hodlers. Or opt for the highest level private client service with unchained signature and get a dedicated account manager, discounted trading fees, exclusive access to events and features, and much much more. If you want a partner that helps you secure and grow your bitcoin without giving up control, go to unchained.com and use the code TFTC10 at checkout to get 10% off your new Bitcoin multisig vault. That's TFTC tenchain.com sup freaks.

Host (Possibly Marty) (39:29)

Been seeing a lot of YouTube comments. Marty, your skin looks so good. You're looking fit these days. How are you doing it? Well, number one, I'm going to the gym more. Trying to get my swell on. Trying to be a good example for my young son to fit. Healthy dad. But part of that is having a good regimen, particularly staying hydrated, making sure I have the right electrolytes and salts in my body. That is why I use salt of the earth. I drink probably three of these a day. With one packet of salt of the earth. I'm like in the pink lemonade right now. It's my flavor of choice. This is their creatine. I've added this to my regimen. They have it in these packets as well. Makes it extremely convenient if you're traveling. You want to work out while you're traveling, but you don't want to be carrying a white bag of powder going through tsa. It's very, very nerve wracking at times you have to explain hates. It's not what you think it is. It's creatine. I'm trying to get my swell on. Make sure you're staying hydrated. Have become addicted to these. It's made my life a lot better. I can supplement this for coffee in the morning and be energized right away. I can supplement. I can bring the Creatine wherever I need to. Just put a couple packets in here before I head to the gym. Bring this to the gym. Drinking out of a glass bottle. Make sure I'm not injecting any microplastics into my body. Go to drink sotay.com use the code TFTC and you'll get 15% off anything in the store. That's drink sotay.com code TFTC bringing this back to Wash and what John Arnold and I were discussing this morning is I think Wash has publicly said he'd like to do interest rate, lower interest rates, but restrict the expansion of the balance sheet. Not only restrict it, but begin or continue to unwind the Fed balance sheet. And we were discussing that. I think the probability of being able to execute on that is very low. And John was.

Vince (41:27)

Yeah, I'm sorry, Yeah, I was gonna.

Host (Possibly Marty) (41:32)

Say John was explaining there you could get QE via another route, which is you push all that treasury buying onto the commercial banking system by changing the SLR and other stuff.

Vince (41:43)

Right, right, right. That makes a lot of sense. I mean, when you phrase it that way, you're John Arnold. Sounds like. Sounds like he might be onto something. Simply put, we had started, we just started something that's called RMB, but it's really QE. Basically, the Fed is going out and buying 3 year treasuries instead of selling 10 year treasuries like it should. And so now we have a little bit of this yield curve control concept of QE coming. Maybe Wash is going to kill that at lower rates and maybe the market is telling him that's a bad idea. So I think that's actually a good point. It's not so much that Wash is a hawk, it's so much that he wants to stop the QE and lower rates, which might be an error at least to how the market is looking at it. But you're saying that he could do a different type of QE or a different, different manifestation of qe. What is John saying?

Host (Possibly Marty) (42:42)

You just do QE via another means, which is you go through the commercial banking system and basically set up like Shell QE and you change the reserve requirements for Treasuries and you highly encourage the commercial banking system to issue credit to the industrial policy.

Vince (43:02)

Right, right. You lower reserve requirements, let them lever up, give them a free toaster, tell them to go for it.

Host (Possibly Marty) (43:09)

We'll be here when things blow up.

Vince (43:11)

That's right. That makes sense. That might be what we're looking at.

Host (Possibly Marty) (43:15)

So what do you, what do you think the next six months looks like in terms of how all this shakes out? What are you looking for? What are the big dominoes to fall or headlines you're looking for in the geopolitical sense?

Vince (43:32)

Well, starting with metals, assuming there's no geopolitical news, I would say I think metals need to go sideways. I'd like to see them go sideways for three months as opposed to dive or re rally. I mean, believe me, I want it to re rally, but I don't want it to do anything right now. I want it to just figure itself out and let the fundamentals reassert themselves. But geopolitically, it's actually pretty digital for me. Geopolitically, if you read Michael Hartnett, the CIO at bank of America, he's been pretty good with this lately. And he's of the opinion that Trump domestic policies must mirror what he's dealing with overseas. So because of his overseas difficulties, he's essentially adopted Nixon's model. It doesn't look like Nixon's model, but it is. The first thing is Nixon, Richard Nixon spent a lot of money domestically and that's what Trump is doing. He did that. Nixon was basically a liberal Republican then. What Nixon did was he put in price caps. Now, Trump hasn't put in price caps. He's not going around saying he can't raise prices. He's going around to each industry saying he can't raise prices, lower your prices to the drug industry, lower your prices to the utilities. He's going around industry by industry and in a populous sort of way, getting prices controlled, trying to anyway. And the third way is, well, Nixon was constantly trying to get rates lowered. So he's Nixon as far as I'm concerned, good or bad, he's Nixon. Now, the problem with this is for Trump to do this. He's trying to raise money with tariffs. And I think he's going to run into a brick wall. And he's going to realize that as long as tariffs are in play and he can't get rates lower or at least with qe, he's going to hurt the economy at some point. And so I think he's going to have to walk back the tariffs again, Taco, if you will. And he's going to have to. He's going to cave on tariffs. That's my opinion. That's my opinion. Behaviorally, he's going to cave or compromise on tariffs. So that's my geopolitical comment. And that will be done to rescue the domestic popularity. Now, what can save him is if we do actually get peace in the Middle east or we do get peace in Ukraine. So I'm looking at it that way. I'm looking at he has something he has to do that's not going to be good for. That's gonna be good for the market, but bad for him. He needs something good for him that's also good for the market. So that my, my position is, my position is the next six months, I'd like to see the markets go nowhere, and I think the Fed would like to see the markets go nowhere as well, sideways, just transition into something different. And let's see what the midterms bring so we can see if Trump is a lame duck. He's a lame duck, but so we can see if he has influence anymore. But going into the midterms, do not be surprised if we see a tariff compromise, because it'll pop the markets and get him his votes back for his midterm electorate. So that's where I'm. Geopolitically, I think there's going to be a war. I think the big problem coming on the horizon is us getting China out of Latin America, believe it or not, makes Taiwan a bigger risk. The moment that Trump said Monroe Doctrine, China put out a paper, and the paper said it used to say, we like Latin America, we like Latin America, we like Latin America, and we also own Taiwan. That's their paper. Right. But this new paper that came out when Trump made his point was, Taiwan is ours. We love Latin America. Taiwan is ours. And so the rhetoric changed and the order changed. So what they're saying is, you know, it's kind of almost like a meme now, but what they're saying is, if you can go in and you can take Maduro out, we'll do it in Taiwan. So that's the wild card. The wild card is if Trump doesn't give in on tariffs and China struggles a little bit, maybe they do a little bit of their own domestic flexing to look powerful. So my wild card is, my black swan is Taiwan. My done deal is Tyrus easing, and my hope for the economy is a war ending over the next six months. I mean, not very exciting to talk about today, but I think we're all kind of tired from everything that's going on. Exhausting.

Host (Possibly Marty) (48:17)

I certainly am. But as you're explaining that, and obviously the last two days, everybody's been hyper focused on markets, on gold and silver particularly. But if you just look at the last three weeks, you have the ICE riots in Minneapolis this Claude Bot thing hitting the mark and everybody going crazy over the AI, obviously. Venezuela from a few weeks ago.

Vince (48:41)

Oh, Claude Bot. Yeah. Nobody's talking about it. My neck of the woods. But you're right, that's a big deal.

Host (Possibly Marty) (48:45)

Yeah, it's a big deal, but it's just like this whipsawing of narratives. Like, I woke up today, I'm like, what are people saying about ice in Minneapolis? And nobody's talking about it online. You have the Epstein files getting released. Everybody's focused on those right now.

Vince (49:00)

I know. I feel like I'm getting chewed up by the news.

Host (Possibly Marty) (49:03)

Well, that's why I like talking to people like you, because you focus on the long term signal and you're diving into research and literature that is relatively under the radar that people aren't focusing on, but you get these signals. And bringing it back to China, Taiwan. I think Venezuela was a very bold move. As an American, I think actually it makes sense to make that move. But to your point, it was humiliating for the Chinese. The Chinese had a delegation there that day. Got no warning. You have.

Vince (49:34)

I know we did it. Let me ask you a question. Do you think it was truly humiliating or do you think. I mean, it was humiliating. Let's not lie about that. It was humiliating. But do you think that China knew about it and had to go along with it? You know what I mean?

Host (Possibly Marty) (49:49)

I don't know. I mean, I'm assuming they didn't.

Vince (49:52)

And can you imagine just going in there and saying, oh, China's there, let's do it, because China's there to really stick it to them. That's pretty. It's pretty embarrassing. You know, we just went right in there and did that. With sound weapons or whatever the hell.

Host (Possibly Marty) (50:07)

Yeah, the discombobulator. No, but it's like you're towing a line. Like to do that and then to expect China not to do anything, like that's a. That's a very bold calculus. So maybe they won't do anything. And maybe China is the paper tiger that people. Some people have been talking about for years.

Vince (50:29)

Maybe, maybe. I mean, look, I'm not an expert in this area, but I've talked to people that understand a lot more than I do. A land war in China is one thing, a land war in Asia is one thing, but an ocean war with the US Apparently China doesn't even have, really have a deep water port or what they call it, a blue water port. So that's difficult. I mean, they have the artillery, but they don't have the access. Like we have California. California is a deep, long water port. China doesn't have that. So they're limited in their, in their ocean projection. So maybe they are the paper tiger that you saw. Paper Dragon, I guess, maybe. Is that what they would be?

Host (Possibly Marty) (51:16)

But I mean, to your point, and I'm not sure if you've seen the reports of them retrofitting shipping, Shipping boats with, with military equipment. There's like.

Vince (51:27)

No.

Host (Possibly Marty) (51:27)

What are they doing putting like missile systems in like large shipping container ships? They're repurposing. Oh, really? Like freight ships.

Vince (51:39)

Is. Is that a sign of weakness? I don't know.

Host (Possibly Marty) (51:42)

I don't know. Sign of a. Yeah.

Vince (51:45)

Interesting.

Host (Possibly Marty) (51:48)

Yeah, it is wild. Yeah. This year started off hot, real hot. Like bringing it back to midterms.

Vince (51:56)

Well, we've had a good year in the last month, right? I mean, every January has been crazy for the last four years. It's just, you know, war. Well, then again, it is Trump. It is Trump. You got to respect Trump's chaos. That's what he's all about.

Host (Possibly Marty) (52:16)

And so I guess we could.

Vince (52:20)

Really.

Host (Possibly Marty) (52:20)

End by focusing in on the monetary order side of things if we're in a bit of a reprieve. Metals cooling off, bitcoin cooling off, People catching their breath. But based off my conversation with Josh, seems like people are. Some countries are dashing for physical on the back end. And obviously the last time we talked, we talked about the gold warrant, got the Shanghai exchange and sort of that need to create that.

Vince (52:52)

Oh yeah, the gold warrant. You want to talk about that again?

Host (Possibly Marty) (52:55)

It seems like things have progressed and.

Vince (52:59)

Yeah, that's actually. You know what, yeah, we should talk about that. China, I mean, last time we talked, China was taking the gold in their vaults and putting it aside on warrants and nobody knows on warrant for what. But since then, since we talked last time about this, we went into the whole big thing that was picked up by that YouTuber. So thank you for that exposure, by the way. Since that has happened, Marty, since that has happened, Hong Kong has announced that they're doing a joint venture with Shanghai to produce a cross collateral product. So your gold in Shanghai can be used as collateral in Hong Kong with all the risks involved with that. And so it's kind of like the vaults. Look, we talked about this. We told this Fred Flintstone blockchain, that's what we called it, is that we all think it's Hong Kong, it's Shanghai, it's Saudi Arabia, and it's like maybe two or three other places and your gold is there. Your gold is there, my gold is there. And so they're connecting these with this blockchain type of product, whether it be, I think it's Cardano that they're leaning towards right now. Yeah, they're leaning towards Cardano. And then they're creating this basket called the unit. And the Unit basically is a basket of gold plus currencies. And so you're over in Saudi Arabia and I'm over in India and I have a vault with my gold in it. You have a vault with your gold in it. And we have this token that goes back and forth that says, the gold's there, the gold's there. And so we trade. Well, the reason that's not a fallacy, not just a fantasy anymore is because Hong Kong said they're connecting with Shanghai. Now it may seem like they should obviously connect because they're both Chinese, but the reality of it is Hong Kong's a different jurisdiction. And so Shanghai is purely China and Hong Kong is a gateway to the Western world. So you've got. This is coming from reliable sources. I've been working on this for about the last six months. And Eric Young, King Kong on Twitter or X, I should say he provides his own perspective. And that is gold is going to be used as collateral for financing developing nations economies. So right now the US will say, you have a Treasury, I'll give you money against it. China is saying, you don't need a Treasury, you can do it with gold. And so the gold in China and the gold in Hong Kong are going to be the first node that operates. So this warrants in China thing, this is, I mean, you know, I don't want to get like too bubbly about it, but this is happening. The dollar is going to be directly competed with by gold as a collateral, not as a currency. It's not a currency. It's a collateral asset. It's gold. It's a pet rock. It sits there. It doesn't do anything great. We know what it is today, we know what it is tomorrow. They're not ready for immutable ledgers. They need to be involved in it. They're ready for, oh, yeah, I think that's worth something. You think that's worth something? We know it's worth more than a Treasury because the US can't be trusted. Let's use it. Let's use silver too. No, no, no, no. Stick with gold, all right? Nobody uses it. It's useless. It's pretty. And so my gold is in my vault. Your goal is in your Vault. We have a token that says that my gold's here. You have a token that says your gold's there. I buy some wheat from you, you buy some oil from me, we settle the trade in gold, and that's what the Hong Kong, Shanghai is going to be. It's a big, big, big fucking deal, Marty. And, like, it's going to happen soon. And maybe that's why everybody's freaking out about metals right now. Maybe you got to get your collateral, you know, like, if bitcoin were collateral, they'd be like, I need it tomorrow. And bitcoin will eventually be collateral, you know, but that's. That's the point, everyone. I mean, I know you're not. You don't need to focus on bitcoin, but I really think it's important to juxtapose bitcoin with gold here. If you think central banks are going to say, let's use bitcoin now, they're not going to say it. They all have gold. They're not going to throw it out. They're going to use what they have and then they're going to say, wait a minute, I have too much gold. Maybe I should buy some bitcoin. So that's the evolution for immutable ledgers. It's like once you realize that it's just a brick, you don't need a brick. You can just use a ledger. So anyway, gold is going to be the bridge off of Treasuries and onto a more appropriate, perfect money. Whether it's bitcoin or something else, I don't know. But it's gold's turn. It's gold's turn. That's it.

Host (Possibly Marty) (57:58)

Well, it's interesting you mentioned this. No topography between China and Hong Kong and the fact they're starting this. I'm not sure if you caught it, but Tether has launched a gold back digital currency as well. Tether gold. And so you have this sort of east versus West.

Vince (58:17)

They own as much as a central bank now.

Host (Possibly Marty) (58:19)

Oh, yeah. They own something like 14 tons or something like that.

Vince (58:26)

140 tons. 140 tons? Yeah. Oh, yeah, yeah, I did. I did it right up on it. That's interesting. I completely spaced on that. But that's. That's really important. Now, this is a different product. I mean, not different product, but I want to get your thoughts on that. I'm thinking that I got from a reliable source, not only Tether is doing it, but Tether's major competitors are doing it. Two of them are. And in Saudi Arabia, someone's doing it with silver. I don't know. Not Saudi Arabia. Dubai. Like that makes sense. Dubai blockchain, crypto, tax free haven. If you're going to make a product, you want to make it in Dubai. Dubai is where you want to be. And so I think if you look at it from the normies or normal people that are looking at the United States, you got Trump, he's a gold bug, right? You're going, well in February, IRAs can now have gold in them. And we do need to buy more gold because China's using it. How can we get more gold in the country without distracting from the dollar? Well, first let's get Bitcoin under control. We got that. Okay, we got that under control. Now let's start buying gold through Tether. I mean, I'm not outright saying it, but if I were Tether and isn't the CEO of Tether a former government.

Host (Possibly Marty) (59:42)

Official of Tether usa, Bo Hines? Yes. He was working under David Sacks. The cryptos are.

Vince (59:50)

Yeah. So there, I mean, Tether buys gold whether it's for the United States or not. They're going to create a product and when the United States says, okay, you can put gold in your 401k and all the boomers and Generation X people like myself are like, okay, I'll do that. Well, it's like, well, here's the stablecoin Tether to give you. It's kind of like it's new, it's hip, but it's still gold. It's, you know, the whole world is going to start using gold somehow because they're not happy with treasuries anymore and eventually they'll use something else. But right now it's gold. That's a good point. I forgot all about.

Host (Possibly Marty) (60:29)

Oh yeah. As you were describing the, the China Hong Kong gold relationship, it just made me think like, huh, it is interesting that Tether launched Tether Gold in last, last year and they've accumulated so much. Like, is that. Not that I'm a big believer in 3D or 4D chess behind the scenes, but it does make you the conspiratorial mind. Any wonder?

Vince (60:51)

But it might just be good.

Host (Possibly Marty) (60:53)

They see all this gold at the Shanghai exchange getting called a warrant and say, all right, we need to counter position this. So Tether, we need you to launch this as well.

Vince (61:04)

Well, three years ago HSBC created a product and this ties into Tether. HSBC created a product three years ago that would be a gold backed stablecoin. Now they're Trying to launch it for retail in Asia, you know, Thailand, Indonesia, those areas around there. And I don't know that it's caught on yet, but tether just hired HSBC's best traders. Duh. It's all happening. You're right, that's a good point.

Host (Possibly Marty) (61:34)

Yeah.

Vince (61:35)

Look at us solving the problems. We got it.

Host (Possibly Marty) (61:37)

We got a good.

Vince (61:38)

So Tether's going to launch a product.

Host (Possibly Marty) (61:40)

We got a good education, you know, we're able to think, think clearly about this stuff.

Vince (61:45)

Yeah, yeah, we went to a pretty decent high school. I know that. Right. Wait, where'd you go to university?

Host (Possibly Marty) (61:52)

DePaul University in Chicago.

Vince (61:56)

Ah, okay. I went to St. Joe's University. You're a trader but you went to DePaul, so that's pretty good.

Host (Possibly Marty) (62:02)

Were you when you were telling that John Arnold story, were you at CBOT or were you trade in New York?

Vince (62:09)

No, I was, I was in New York. Natural gas options are New York exchange. So I was, I'm a New York floor guy. Chicago floor guys are actually better trader than New York field floor guys. But we don't, we don't, we don't tell them that.

Host (Possibly Marty) (62:21)

But yeah, yeah, I worked, I worked at a manager.

Vince (62:24)

Were you in Chicago during that time?

Host (Possibly Marty) (62:26)

I was in Chicago like 2009-2014. But I worked at a managers fund which is a bunch of ex CBOT guys and they had incredible war stories from the floor.

Vince (62:40)

Oh yeah, there's all kinds of good stories. Chicago is a very bizarre place for the trading on the floor. New York is smaller in terms of trading and there's more colorful stories. But Chicago, Chicago, if you look at the trading pit from this, from the, from the, from the, whatever, the observation deck, it was like an ocean. It was. And every corner of it was, it was like Where's Waldo? Really fascinating stuff. Anyway.

Host (Possibly Marty) (63:07)

Yeah, it was. I was. I mean by the time I had gotten into the industry, it was all servers and there was a bunch of, a bunch of nostalgia for the old days of screaming on the floor and throwing the signs.

Vince (63:19)

Yep, yep, yep, I hear you.

Host (Possibly Marty) (63:24)

Well, Vince, appreciate your time this afternoon. I think this is a good update. Things are cooling off. It's good to recalibrate, figure out where, where things are, where they may go and catch your breath every once in a while.

Vince (63:39)

It's funny. It's funny because, you know, here we are being relatively mellow and I'm going, yeah, but you know what? Tomorrow is probably going to shit. Something's going to shit. Something's going to hit the fan. And you and I will be like no break for us now. But anyway, feet sticking ditches. Thanks for having me.

Host (Possibly Marty) (63:57)

Thank you, Vince. Go Go join the Goldfix substack freaks. It's a great read. Peace of Love okay, thank you for listening to this episode of tftc. If you've made it this far, I imagine you got some value out of the episode. If so, please share it far and wide with your friends and family. We're looking to get the word out there. Also, wherever you're listening, whether that's YouTube, Apple, Spotify, make sure you like and subscribe to the show. And if you can, leave a rating on the podcasting platforms, that goes a long way. Last but not least, if you want to get these episodes a day early and ad free, make sure you download the Fountain podcasting app. You can go to Fountain FM to find that $5 a month get you every episode a day early ad free helps. The show gives you incredible value, so please consider subscribing via Fountain as well. Thank you for your time and until next time.