Amanda Hope Haley (23:39)
Actually, this particular story I don't tell in this book I told in a previous one, but it happened when I was in grad school, actually. I. I GRE in the church. I grew up hearing these stories. I was baptized twice because I was sprinkled by the Presbyterians and then dumped by the Baptists, you know, so, like, I really grew up steeped in Christian traditions and stories. And I did, I learned all of that. And when I got to undergrad and I started studying the Bible and I started learning the languages of the Bible, I would, or it would be pointed out to me certain things that maybe the church had skipped over. Like Noah, there's kind of two different stories in there. Did he bring the animals on 2 by 2 or 7 by 2? The story of creation, Genesis 1 is in a different order from what happens in Genesis 2 and 3. And so these things started being pointed out to me. And for a long time I just sort of held this obvious like biblical textual knowledge a little bit separate from what I've always been taught to believe in it. It took me years to bring those things together. Well, in graduate school, sort of the ultimate example of this was I was sitting in a class where we were reading non canonical gospels. So books that sound like maybe they could be in the Bible, but they were written a couple of hundred years later, maybe they weren't part of the canon, maybe because they were found too late or often because they're not complete, sections are missing from them. And often, often, often also they don't actually match up with the other stuff. Like they're just obviously not divinely inspired. And one of those is called the Gospel of Mary. So we're reading the Gospel of Mary, and in this gospel, at which the entire section, like the middle section is missing from it at the moment, although there's a scholar out there who thinks she may have found that just in the last couple of years, so stay tuned. But we're reading this. And so the, the narrative is Jesus has come back and he has given Mary Magdalene some very specific knowledge. He's given her, he's given her a vision, he's told her something important. And that's exactly what's missing from the text is whatever it was that Jesus said. And then you come back into it and the apostles are saying, are basically saying, you know, no, no, no, why would Jesus tell Mary something? Why wouldn't he tell us we were the ones who are his apostles? That's sort of the narrative. And the teaching fellow in the class just asked us, okay, so why do you think the apostles wouldn't listen to Mary Magdalene? And I raised my hand, bold as brass with all of my deep Sunday school theological knowledge. And I said, well, because she was a prostitute and there was an undergrad sitting across from me and I this is just as vivid today as it was 20 years ago. He's wearing this pink polo shirt and like the collar slipped up and we weren't doing that at that time. And he kicked back in his chair, he hit the wall and he laughed and he said, how did you get to Harvard and still think that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute? And I flushed as red as my hair and I think tears sprung to my eyes. And I didn't. I mean, I was embarrassed and I was confused. And the teaching fellow handled it really well. I'm thankful to Richard, to this day, for the way that he explained it. But before I explain that, let me tell you what happened next. I left class and I called my mother and I told her what had happened. And my mom, I'm like, walking back home because I didn't have a car. I watched three Miles every day. And I'm just very upset. I'm telling her, she's like, amanda, they're wrong. I know Mary Magdalene was a prostitute because when I was a child, I was in an Easter pageant and my mother painted my face, my eyes with blue eyeshadow so that everybody would know that I was Mary Magdalene the prostitute. And I thought about this, and it's like, here are is at least three generations of women in my family who love the Bible, who are believers, who go to church. And we all three firmly believe the Bible says something that the Bible doesn't say. And that ended up being sort of what cracked it open for me. Well, so back to Richard. He explains that essentially what happened was there was a Pope, Pope Gregory the Great, and one day he was giving a homily, and he was talking about Luke 7. And in Luke 7, you have the sinner, the woman sinner. It actually, it doesn't say if it's sexual sin or anything like that. She just is a sinner. She's washing Jesus's feet with her hair. She doesn't have a name. And so that apparently bothered Pope Gregory, and he decided to go to, okay, whatever the next female name is that's in scripture. I'm just going to call her that. Well, the Next. In Luke 8, you have Mary Magdalene, and that is Jesus casting demons out of her. It doesn't actually say that she's sinful. It certainly doesn't say that she's a prostitute or anything like that. Simply, he cast out the demons. Well, so he conflated these two women. He said, these must have been the same person. And then he goes on in that homily to take those seven demons. This is also the origin of the seven deadly sins. So I think most of us have heard of that at this point. So he then, at that point invents these seven deadly sins, one of which is sexual sin. And then over time, this just sort of evolves and, or maybe devolves into Mary Magdalene. It was sexual sin. And then eventually Mary Magdalene was a prostitute. And so you have to consider at this time, this is prior to the Protestant, Protestant Reformation. This is prior to Scriptures being translated into anything. If you didn't know Hebrew, Greek or Actually, it wasn't Latin, Hebrew, Greek, or Latin then. You could not read the Scriptures for yourself. And the Pope at that time, he is the mouthpiece of God. And so whatever he says goes. And people start talking about that, it starts being depicted in artwork. You see in the Renaissance, Mary Magdalene. There's a beautiful portrait of Mary Magdalene by. By Michelangelo. And she's depicted as a redhead because classically centering, sinning, sinful women were redheads. Jezebel gets that treatment, too. Thank you very much, gentlemen. She's, you know, as a redhead, she's actually topless in. In this portrait. And so art begins to perpetuate this. So that's where the story came from. Scripture itself says, yes, she had demons, but what scripture actually tells us about Mary Magdalene. She was the only individual that all four gospels say were present at Jesus's open tomb. Not even just the only man, but the only individual. She followed him. She supported his ministry. That's actually what Scripture says. But we've had all of these hundreds of years of tradition that have have gotten us to the point where we read this into the scripture. When we're talking about Mary Magdalene, we picture her the way my felt boards had her. She was always my favorite character on the felt board because her outfit was the prettiest. It was the most colorful. She even had little castanets on her fingers. Like, I loved Mary Magdalene. She was so pretty. Right. And so we have to kind of get through that so we understand textually and historically how that happened. Well, in 2017, in Israel, there's a town called Migdal. Migdal is ancient. Magdala. You can kind of hear, like, the vowels are the same. The name has evolved a little bit over time. But in Migdal, the city went to break ground. They were going to build something new. And mere inches below the surface of the soil, they found synagogues. They found a synagogue. They found a house. They found the ancient city of Magdala. It had never been excavated before. It, as far as I can think of, it is the only, like, Christian site where, you know, well, in this case, where Mary Magdalene came from. But it's the only place that they didn't throw it, that the Byzantine Empire didn't throw a church on top of. Looking at Christian sites is really challenging because they built churches on top of things, and so it's really hard to, like, get under there and do the excavation below. Well, anyway, here is this site that was. That was an active, big community. And we learned from it that it was a big maritime Site. It was a trading center. It was incredibly wealthy, it was incredibly devout. There are, last I heard, there are four mikvah mikvaot mikvahs there. These are ritual pools, ritual places where people go to bathe. When they are built, they have to have naturally flowing water in them. They were engineered so well that to this day, the archaeologists have to pump water out of them. They can't keep the water out. They were so well built and beautifully engineered more than 2,000 years ago. The city, the synagogue that's there has beautiful mosaics. And because of an earthquake that went through there, the mosaics have a ripple in them from where the earth moved and then stopped and it froze. It's an incredible sight. And so from that, we don't learn specifically about Mary Magdalene herself, but we understand where she came from a little bit better. We understand maybe why she might have been a woman of means and could have been somebody going around and supporting Jesus's ministry. And so anyway, yeah, all of that together shows how archaeology and learning that can kind of disrupt these, these, these images that we have and these stories that we've been told that don't actually fit with scripture because the archaeology does, but the stories don't. And so oftentimes what I find is when, say, secular scholarship disagrees with what the Church has said, it's not disagreeing with the Bible, it's disagreeing with, with what the Church has said, what men and women have said, the stories we've told, the way we've boiled things down over time.