Diddys attorney says his case is "the biggest embarrassment to the USA"…… Diddy is to be sentenced Oct 3rd

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: The Breakfast Club – “Diddy's Attorney Says His Case is ‘the Biggest Embarrassment to the USA’… Diddy is to be Sentenced Oct 3rd”

Podcast: The Breakfast Club (iHeartPodcasts)
Air Date: September 25, 2025
Host: Lauren LaRosa (Pop Culture/Legal Segment)
Featured Topic: Sean "Diddy" Combs’ ongoing legal battle and upcoming sentencing

---

Overview

In this episode, Lauren LaRosa brings listeners an inside perspective from the courtroom on the latest developments in the Diddy (Sean Combs) legal case. The focus centers on a recent hearing discussing whether Diddy's charges under the Mann Act should be acquitted ahead of his scheduled sentencing on October 3rd. Lauren provides a detailed play-by-play of the hearing, evaluates the defense and prosecution arguments, analyzes the presiding judge's posture, and reflects on broader themes of government overreach, racial undertones, and the boundaries of personal freedom versus legal intervention.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. Courtroom Atmosphere & Diddy’s State

• Lauren sets the scene: she watched from the overflow room and notes Diddy’s appearance — in a tan inmate jumpsuit, gray and black grown-out hair, but not in shackles.
  (03:25 – 04:45)
• The hearing was relatively short, running from 11am to just after 1pm.

2. Arguments for Acquittal: Diddy’s Defense Team

• Defense tried to argue that the acts in question involved only consenting adults (Diddy, Cassie, Jane Doe), challenging the appropriateness of prosecution under the Mann Act and whether the case should ever have gone this far.
• Emphasis on the defense narrative: “Diddy is a Black man with money, with power, who is being targeted by the government.” (05:40)
• Diddy’s attorney, Shapiro, delivers a powerful statement:

  “This is the biggest embarrassment to the United States of America.”
  — Diddy’s Attorney Shapiro, paraphrased by Lauren LaRosa (08:20)

• Defense asserts no financial profit was involved; cites Diddy as a “producer of amateur porn” rather than a commercial beneficiary.
• Argues First Amendment rights: “He was a great producer of amateur porn, and he was a consumer of amateur porn, which you can’t... He can’t be convicted of these counts under the Mann Act because of that. That violates his First Amendment rights.” (10:20)

3. Prosecution’s Rebuttal

• Prosecution responds that the defense’s arguments had already been addressed in trial, and the jury had determined conviction was warranted:

  “A jury sat here for seven to eight weeks... and they decided that we needed to be here. They convicted him, not us.” — Paraphrased by Lauren LaRosa (07:27)

• Prosecution maintains the law is clear and Diddy’s actions fall under the Mann Act as interpreted.

4. Debate Over Definitions: Prostitution, Consent, and the Law

• Defense attempts to reframe actions as consensual and akin to OnlyFans-style content, where all parties are both performers and consumers:

  “She made the point that with OnlyFans... when people are watching these acts... there’s an intention... that’s exactly what was happening with Diddy and the freak offs.” — Lauren LaRosa (13:09)

• Judge probes definitions:

  “So you’re telling me if a businessman and his client goes to a brothel... this is not prostitution?” — Judge questioning Diddy’s attorney (18:15)

  • Repeated clarifying questions signal skepticism about defense arguments.

5. Judge’s Neutral–But Stern–Posture

• Lauren notes the judge is holding both sides to the law, but is not moved by emotional or media-friendly defense tactics, especially accusations of government overreach:

  “The judge is not letting up on either side... But I do think he’s going a little bit harder on Diddy’s side though... I highly doubt anything will be acquitted.”
  — Lauren LaRosa (12:39)

6. Societal Questions Raised

• Is the government overreaching by prosecuting what some see as consensual adult acts?
• Why does the law criminalize activity that some consider private sexual conduct?

  “Are we just minding someone’s sexual business? Are we minding what goes on in Diddy’s bed basically, right?” — Lauren LaRosa (19:20)

• Prosecution justifies intervention citing historical reasons for prostitution laws: community harm, prevention of abuse and drug use, which they allege are present in Diddy’s case.

7. Memorable Moments & Quotes

• “They called him a great producer of amateur porn. And I’m like, not Diddy being a man all up in the videos working in his favor.”
  — Lauren LaRosa (10:00)
• “I think Diddy’s team has not proven anything with the acquittal. I think that’s number one.”
  — Lauren LaRosa (12:50)
• “The judge ain’t phased, baby. The judge does not care about any of that whatsoever. The judge is looking at... What are we dealing with?”
  — Lauren LaRosa (22:09)

8. Next Steps

• Judge did not rule on the acquittal motion but signaled proceedings will continue:

  “If nothing is acquitted, I’ll see you all next week.” — Judge, paraphrased by Lauren LaRosa (23:30)

• Sentencing set for October 3rd; acquittal on charges seen as highly unlikely by Lauren and, seemingly, the court.

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• [03:25–04:45]: Lauren describes the courtroom scene, Diddy’s demeanor.
• [05:30–08:00]: Defense arguments and context; “biggest embarrassment” quote.
• [10:00–13:10]: Arguments about intent, financial gain, definition of amateur porn; comparison to OnlyFans.
• [14:00–16:00]: Debate over legal reason for government involvement in private conduct; prosecution connects case to harm prevention.
• [18:00–19:30]: Judge’s clarifying questions highlight skepticism toward the defense.
• [22:00–23:30]: Lauren’s analysis of the likely outcome and judge’s thinking; confirmation sentencing is set.

---

Summary: Takeaways for Listeners

• Lauren LaRosa provides a unique, insightful view from the courtroom, cutting through legal jargon to highlight the central legal, social, and media tensions in the Diddy case.
• The defense relies heavily on themes of consensual adult behavior and government overreach, while the prosecution focuses on societal harms the law is meant to address.
• The judge appears unmoved by emotional appeals, focusing on the facts and established law, signaling that acquittal is unlikely.
• The broader public debate will likely continue around government intervention in personal lives, especially high-profile and racially charged cases.

---

Notable Quote:

“This is the biggest embarrassment to the United States of America.”
— Diddy’s Attorney Shapiro, paraphrased by Lauren LaRosa [08:20]

---

Listeners walk away with a comprehensive understanding of the courtroom drama, legal arguments, and stakes for Diddy as his sentencing approaches on October 3rd.

Transcript

[Lauren LaRosa]

This is an I Heart Podcast. Hi everyone, it's Regina hall and Teyana Taylor here. Let us give you one reason after another to see our new movie. One Battle after Another. Here we go. Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro. It's a great story. Action, laughs, thrill. You got some heart. And badass women. That's us. Mm, that's a pretty good list. That's so many reasons why you need to catch one battle after another.

[Podcast Announcer]

Only in Peter Tomorrow from Paul Thomas Anderson. Rated R under 17 on middle without.

[Commercial Narrator]

Parent the best kind of help is the kind you don't even have to ask for. Like your friend pulling up on moving day with a truck, a speaker and snacks ready to go. Well, that's the energy you get with AT&T's new guarantee. If there's ever a network interruption, they make it right by giving you credit for a full day of service. Proactively credit for fiber downtime lasting 20 minutes or more or wireless downtime lasting 60 minutes or more or caused by a single incident impacting 10 or more towers. Restrictions and exclusions apply. See att.com guaranty for full details at and T Connecting changes everything.

[Commercial Narrator 2]

Time for a sofa upgrade. Visit washablesofas.com and discover Annabe where designer style meets budget friendly prices with sofas starting at $699, Annabe brings you the ultimate in furniture innovation with a modular design that allows you to rearrange your space effortlessly. Perfect for both small and large spaces, Anibe is the only machine washable sofa inside and out. Say goodbye to stains and messes with liquid and stain resistant fabrics that make cleaning easy. Liquid simply slides right off. Designed for custom comfort, our high resilience foam lets you choose between a sink in feel or a supportive memory foam blend. Plus our pet friendly stain resistant fabrics ensure your sofa stays beautiful for years. Don't compromise quality for price. Visit washablesofas.com to upgrade your living space today with no risk returns and a 30 day money back guarantee. Get up to 60% off plus free shipping and free returns. Shop now at washablesofas.com Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Commercial Narrator]

Stop settling for weak sound. It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra durable.

[Lauren LaRosa]

LG X Boom portable speaker and enjoy.

[Commercial Narrator]

Vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new heights because, let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG XBoom and for a limited time, save [e-mail] with code fall25. Bring the boom. Xboom.

[Podcast Announcer]

Let's get to it. Time to do it.

[Lauren LaRosa]

I'm the homegirl that knows a little bit about everything.

[Commercial Narrator]

And everybody, you know, she don't lie about that, right? Lauren came in hot.

[Lauren LaRosa]

Hey, y'. All. What's up? It's Lauren LaRosa. And this is is the latest with Lauren LaRosa. This is your daily dig on all things pop culture, entertainment news, and all of the conversations that shake the room, Baby. Now, I just got home from court. You know your girl. Love to take y' all to court. Love to take y' all to court. I didn't plan on being in court for diddy again until October 3rd, but today there was actually a hearing about whether Diddy's charges, the two men act charges, or the two men act count that he has been convicted with, whether those would be acquitted or not. Now, I was told heading into this, and I talked about this a bit on the Breakfast Club this morning, that because Diddy, you know, was coming was. Was told to come into court, you know, all. Of course, all of his attorneys are there. His family is there. You know, there was some hope that this would be a day where things would be laid out and things, you know, we would hear possibly that he would be acquitted of some things potentially. I was told that there was hope that that is what today would be and moving forward, that's what today will equal. The judge did not make a decision in court today, but I'm gonna be honest with y'. All. I was sitting in court today, and it was short. We got it started at 11. It was over around, like, 1. Like, not too long after 1:00pm and I was sitting in court, and I'm looking at Diddy. He's in a inmate jumpsuit. It's tan. His hair has been very gray with some black, but, you know, it's longer now. Like, you can tell he hasn't cut it. He's not in, like, shackles or anything like that, but he is in an inmate jumpsuit. And I'm sitting here, I'm in an overflow room. So I'm watching the main courtroom from a TV monitor, and I'm just like, man, all of these weeks, all of these days, all of these hours that has been spent for us to get to this moment, I don't know if it was really worth it for the government, if I'm being honest with y'. All. In the beginning of all of this, you Know. Cause typically with the feds, when they come for you, they got some things going on. Okay? They got some things going on. Like the feds are not just coming for you off a whim, especially not coming by land and by sea. So when I'm there and the prosecution is beginning to lay out their case that this first week, and you know, you guys will remember I told you, I thought Diddy's team, his defense team, his attorneys did a great job even from the very first day of court. I thought even though the prosecutor was laying out a case and you know, they were slowly setting up this narrative and you know, they were setting us up for the slam dunk, I really thought Diddy's team did a great job of always coming back and defending, always coming back and reminding you of certain things that cast a bit of doubt, especially when it came to that RICO charge. But I thought by the end of this case, you know, we'd be thinking maybe Diddy's looking at anywhere from 6 to 10 years with some time served. Now, I would be surprised if Diddy is going to be, I would say three years would be a lot for him in this situation. He's already done. It's going to be 14 months sometime soon. They're asking for time served. And today, Diddy's attorney, Shapiro, Diddy's attorney, she stood up at the end of everything. At the end of them arguing back and forth for all these hours about things we done heard them say a thousand and one times. She stood up and she said, this is the biggest embarrassment to the United States of America. She's talking about this whole, first of all, the whole case, but just the fact that Diddy is still sitting here on these men act prostitution charges. I said, oh, I know what this is about, baby. They know how to feed the media, don't they? Because that right there, that was a hell of a headline. That was a hell of a mic drop moment. So I want to back you guys up and just take you through what court today was like. So we were there, court begins, and they're arguing back and forth. It's kind of like a ping pong. So the defense is arguing that basically, what are we even doing here? These are consenting adults, Cassie, Jane and Diddy, who were in a relationship at various times with Diddy, and they decided to go and do threesomes and live this voyeurism lifestyle. And because of that, now their client Diddy is facing time in jail, which is not fair. They also leaned heavily into, you know, Bringing up the fact that the man act and a lot of the background on the Mann act is, you know, has very, you know, racial undertones. That has been a conversation. And that leans back into kind of what Diddy's team's narrative has been this whole time. Their narrative this whole time has been Diddy is a black man with money, with power who is being targeted by the government. The prosecution came in and said, listen, we've already addressed all of that, so y' all could try that if y' all want to. We've already addressed all of that. Not only did we already address it, but a jury sat here for seven to eight weeks and heard all of this, all of these claims, everything that you guys are bringing up. And they decided that we needed to be here. They convicted him, not us. Diddy's team also, you know, took a lot of time establishing what prostitution is, is not, and what should be considered a john or not, because Diddy's whole team, their argument is that Diddy didn't receive any financial gain from this. So how can this be looked at as anything but him producing? They called him a great producer of amateur porn. And I'm like, not Diddy being a man, all up in the videos, working in his favor. In court, they called him a producer of amateur porn. And they said. They specifically said this was corroborated because you had several people get on the stand, from assistants to Jane Doe to Cassie, and talk about how well produced. These King nights or these hotel nights were great lighting. Everything was choreographed because Diddy was telling the girls what to do, what to wear. There was costume. There was. They made it a full production, baby. And they said, there's two things and two ways this can be looked at. He was a great producer of amateur porn, and he was a consumer of amateur porn, which you can't. He can't be. He can't be convicted of these counts under the man act because of that. That violates his First Amendment rights, which gives him the right to do so. The prosecution said that's not. You know, we're not even going there with y' all because the men act. And the way that we're angling this does not violate his constitutional rights. So let's. Let's stop there. And then that's when Diddy's team brought back in. You know, the mic drop of this is an embarrassment. Why are we even here? What is this all about? These people were consenting. There is not proof that Diddy benefited anyway financially. Now, one thing that I Thought was interesting, you know, in court today, was the fact that, I mean, I think the judge has been done a really good job up until this point of being very neutral. I do think today in court you could tell that first of all, I predicted the judge is not gonna acquit anything whatsoever. That's number one. Number two, if Diddy was to get time served and be able to get the supervised release and all the things they've asked for, I wouldn't be surprised. But I also would not be surprised if the judge says no, we need to look at what prosecution is asking for on the minimum. Like, let's. How can we get closer to there? Because I think one of the things that, you know, I felt in watching and listening to the judge today in court was that, number one, he's not letting up on either side, prosecution or the defense. He wants to make his decision and he wants to make it very sternly on the law. For instance, he asked the prosecution, you know, he's like, listen, y' all submitted all these. All this case law or like previous cases to prove the point that he deserves to go to jail for such and such time based on the man act and you know, all the things. One of the cases that you guys submitted, in all the cases you guys submitted, I need a more specific reference of where a man is not financially benefiting from these commercial sex acts and he is jailed after being convicted. I need a better example because what y' all provided for me there was an exchange of money and at the time the prosecution couldn't even. So he's like, do y' all have any more case study? The prosecution couldn't even come up with a case on the top of their head, but they said that they would provide more in their sentencing conversation. So when he did that, I'm like, okay, like, it's very good to know that this judge is still being fair. Even though to me, I could kind of tell that he's not going for the argument that Diddy's team is going for with this whole acquittal thing. I highly doubt anything will be acquitted. I thought this was an alert about the case, cuz we're still waiting for the judge to make a decision on the acquittal. Um, but he's being very fair. He's being very tough on both sides. I do think he's going a little bit harder on Diddy's side though. I think Diddy's team has not proven anything with the acquittal. I think that's number one. I Also think when, you know, cause Diddy's team, they also were making a point that they're trying to define prostitution. And you know, in defining prostitution, you're able to then pinpoint, if you're the prosecution, the specific acts that Diddy, the specific things that Diddy did that lean into what the definition of prostitution is, right? So Diddy's team is on the other side. You know, they're trying to define prostitution from their end of things and they're trying to lay out everything that proves that there was intent to consent by the women. So they bring up the fact that like, you know, Jane Doe mentioned she had gotten Diddy a TV so that they could watch some of the videos they recorded, these highly produced, choreographed videos, right, that they're calling amateur porn. And Diddy's team is like, you know, this is just like OnlyFans, right? And Diddy's shaking his head yes during this. Like, she's not asking him, she's talking to the judge. But Diddy was visibly shaking his head yes in agreeance, like. And she's making the point that with OnlyFans, when people are watching these acts or whatever they're watching there, there's an intention. So the woman who is recording, the intention is to show it. And the people who are watching are consumers who also who attend, who intend to consume. And she made the point that Diddy's attorney made the point that that's exactly what was happening with Diddy and the freak offs and the fact that anything was being recorded. Things are being not because, you know, these women are being paid or reimbursed for an act that only benefits Diddy, but because everybody involved had the intent to watch it at the end. That was the point that was made.

[Podcast Announcer]

From Paul Thomas Anderson comes one battle after another.

[Commercial Narrator]

What's going on, everybody? It's your boy, Juju Green, AKA Straw Hat Goofy. You're a movie guy. And I'm sitting here with the lovely and quite frankly badass women of one battle after another. We got Regina Hall, Teyana Taylor and Chase Infinity. When you first read your character on that script, what did your character remind you of?

[Lauren LaRosa]

As you can see, you know, we don't always agree with a lot of things that perfidia do, but for the most part, we see a survivor. We see a woman that's in survival mode. You know, we also see a woman that's unapologetically herself, but then she is also like mysterious and like, you know, she got like a little sex appeal that's like you know how she pulling them in like that? You feel me? You know, she's mysterious and she's also like a master manipulator. And she's like a octopus. She can like get her way out of anything. You know what I'm saying? Yeah, I love that.

[Podcast Announcer]

One battle after another in theaters tomorrow.

[Commercial Narrator]

Experience it in IMAX and other premium formats. Get tickets now. Rated R under 17 not admitted without parent there's something special about folks who come through without being asked. Like your coworker surprising you with your favorite coffee just because. Or your friend handing you the aux cord the moment you get in the car. No debate, no fight, just positive vibes. That kind of love. It just hits different. And that's exactly the energy. AT&T is on with their new guarantee. If there's ever a network interruption, AT&T will proactively credit you for a full day of service. No calls, no emails, no jumping through hoops. It's just handled. It's like the universe saying I got you. Except this time it's not the stars aligning, it's your network. And let's be real, that connection is everything. Whether you're holding down the group chat, checking in on your parents scrolling TikTok your network's gotta come through. And if there's a problem, AT&T is on the case. No stress, no drama, just real backup when it counts. Credit for fiber downtime lasting 20 minutes or more or wireless downtime lasting 60 minutes or more or caused by a single incident impacting 10 or more towers. Restrictions and exclusions apply. See att.com guaranty for full details. AT AND T Connecting changes everything.

[Commercial Narrator 2]

Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? Washablesofas.com has your back, featuring the Annabe collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out. Where designer quality meets budget friendly prices. That's right, sofas start at just $699. Enjoy a no risk experience with pet friendly stain resistant and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud like comfort with high resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60% off your Anna Bay sofa backed by a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back Upgrade [e-mail] Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Podcast Announcer]

I bet you've probably been to the doctor's office in the past few months. I bet you had to hand over personal info like your insurance, your id, maybe even your Social Security number. And I bet you weren't thinking about how your doctor is just one of many places that has your personal information. If any one of them isn't careful, it's a good bet they could accidentally expose your details to hackers and identity theft, putting you at risk. Fortunately, LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity. If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock US based restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed, or your money back with plans covering up to $3 million for stolen funds and expenses. Don't take chances with your personal info. Help protect it even when it's out of your hands. Save up to 40% your first year with promo code IHEARTRA. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code IHEART or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40% off. Terms apply.

[Lauren LaRosa]

But I will say I think Diddy's team, there was one question that the judge and it was more of a clarifying question. But I thought that, you know, this being asked as a clarifying question was very, it was very telling of where I think the judge stands. Again, this is what made me think the judge was, is not going to acquit any of Diddy's charges. So the judge, okay, the whole time the judge is trying to get a better understanding from both sides, from prosecution and defense. So he's like, okay. To Diddy's attorney, she's like, so you're telling me if business, if a businessman and his client goes to a brothel and the businessman pays the brothel to have sex with his client, then this is not prostitution. And she says, no, it's not prostitution. And the judge is like, and you're saying that it's not prostitution because at this point, the businessman has no financial gain. And she's like, yeah. So he's like, okay. He's trying to understand, but he acts multiple times like, so this is not prostitution. So he's clarifying. But the undertone to the final clarifying question, I'm like, oh, yeah, no, the judge is not buying it whatsoever. And me walking into court today and sitting there and thinking, why are we here? I think, you know, that speaks to the conversation a lot of people are gonna be having about this for a very long time. Like, did the government overreach Was everything the government did necessary? Was all the resources that were used necessary? On and on and on and so forth. But when it comes specifically to the two charges that Diddy is convicted with, I do believe that in court, there was enough there to convict him. I mean, it doesn't matter what I believe. Y' all heard it from the jury. But. And being in court, I will tell you, I wasn't surprised that those charges stuck whatsoever. Right. So a lot of people are having a conversation now when it comes to prostitution about, is this fair? Because right now, at this point, are we just minding someone's sexual business? Are we minding what goes on in Diddy's bed? Basically, right? Why does the court. Why does the government have their hand in a man's sex life? So they had a conversation about this in court today, and basically, you know, the judge is asking both sides to clarify, why does the court care about this and why should we not? So Diddy's team is saying, look, this was a consensual relationship grown adults got into. They had threesomes, they travel, they live this lifestyle. The things that, you know, can be brought up as heinous or, you know, and of course, they're probably referring to the Cassie video and all those things. That's not what we are here. We're here now because of prostitution. So if we're letting all that go, the reason why the government should be out of Diddy's bedroom is because it was behind closed doors. These are consenting adults. The government was like, wait, what? No, the problem is, according to the government, any case where someone has been, has faced a consequence for prostitution or any law that centers around prostitution. The point of those laws is because prostitution extends an arm to bigger things, like harming the community in different ways. So they talked about exposure to drug use. They talked about laws being created around prostitution, because you want to monitor abuse against women in various ways. You want to monitor drug use. You know, and the prosecution is like, if we look at it, all of that is in this case, there were drugs given to everyone involved in this. And every time they testified, they said that they came. The drugs came from Diddy. There was obvious abuse to women. They talk about Cassie. The prosecution, they ate with this one. So the prosecution, you know, after Diddy's team is like, listen, this is this man's personal bed. The government should not be in his personal bed. This is an embarrassment. Blah, blah, blah, blah. The government comes back in, and they're like, basically, they wanted to say embarrassment, embarrassment, Girl. Where. Because. Let's talk about what happens behind those closed doors. They specifically say Cassie was getting her face beat in. Drugs were given to everybody. Which is why in a case like this, that's why we're sitting here. The decisions were made by the defense's client. Now, listen, Diddy is to be sentenced October 3rd. If nothing is acquitted. I will tell you one thing, too, that I thought was telling in the courtroom. What the judge basically was trying to do was say, okay, if we are. If nothing is acquitted here, I will see you all next Friday. Court is adjourned. Instead of doing that, he kind of stumbled on his words a bit. So the judge said, I'll see you all next. And then he stopped. He said, if nothing is acquitted, I'll see you all next week. And I'm like, oh, baby, the judge already got his mind made up. We gonna. I'll see you next week, judge. We'll all be here Friday. We'll be here light and bright. Yeah, man. I don't know. I do think. I always say I don't know, and then I'll tell you what I know. I do think that the conversation on whether the government wasted their time going so hard, reaching so high in the beginning will always be a thing. And I think it definitely looks insane, but I don't think that a judge is looking at any of that when making his decision about the two counts that Diddy is facing right now. And I think that Diddy's team, you know, they talked about a bunch of different things. They talked about, you know, his. His first amendment rights. They talked about, you know, consensual versus non consensual. They went into all that, but them still leaning the strongest on. Basically, this was an overreach. This was targeting, and this is embarrassing. The judge ain't phased, baby. The judge does not care about any of that whatsoever. The judge is looking at right now. What are we dealing with? What are we like the. The things that you could have said were the overreach, which was the RICO and things of that nature. He's not those. Those charges are not here anymore. So let's focus on what we focusing on. We here. I don't think an acquittal will happen, but we'll have to see what happens. I'm Lauren LaRosa. This is the latest with Lauren LaRosa. At the end of the day, y' all could be anywhere with anybody talking about this, but you choose to be right here. I appreciate you guys so much, and I will see you in my next episode.

[Commercial Narrator 2]

Let's be real Life happens. Kids spill, pets shed and accidents are inevitable. Find a sofa that can keep [e-mail] Starting at just $699, our sofas are fully machine washable inside and out so you can see say goodbye to stains and hello to worry free living. Made with liquid and stain resistant fabrics, they're kid proof, pet friendly and built for everyday life. Plus, changeable fabric covers let you refresh your sofa whenever you want. Neat flexibility. Our modular design lets you rearrange your sofa anytime to fit your space, whether it's a growing family room or a cozy apartment. Plus, they're earth friendly and trusted by over 200,000 happy customers. It's time to upgrade to a stress free, mess proof sofa. Visit washablesofas.com today and save that's washablesofas.com offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Podcast Announcer]

Chances are you've been to the doctor recently and you probably handed over your insurance, your ID and even your Social Security number. Your doctor is just one of many places that has your personal info and if any of them accidentally expose your details, you could be at risk for identity theft. LifeLock monitors millions of data points a second. If you become a victim, they'll fix it guaranteed or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code iheart or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40% off terms apply.

[Commercial Narrator]

Stop settling for weak sound. It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra durable LG X Boom portable speaker and enjoy vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new heights because, let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG XBoom and for a limited time, save [e-mail] with code fall25 bring the boom XBoom.

[Commercial Narrator 2]

There'S a lot going on in Hollywood. How are you supposed to stay on.

[Lauren LaRosa]

Top of it all?

[Commercial Narrator 2]

Variety has the solution. Take 20 minutes out of your day and listen to the new daily Variety podcast For breaking entertainment news and expert.

[Lauren LaRosa]

Perspectives, where do you see the business actually heading?

[Commercial Narrator 2]

Featuring the iconic journalists of Variety and.

[Lauren LaRosa]

Hosted by co Editor in Chief Cynthia Littleton, the only constant in Hollywood is change.

[Commercial Narrator 2]

Open your free iHeartradio app, search daily Variety and Listen Now.

[Lauren LaRosa]

This is an iHeart podcast.