After three Toronto-area synagogues were shot at within the same week earlier this month, new questions are emerging about how the justice system handles antisemitic incidents.

In this episode of The CJN’s "North Star" podcast, Toronto lawyer Michael Teper and former Crown prosecutor Rochelle Direnfeld discuss why many protest-related charges tied to antisemitism in Toronto are later withdrawn, or diverted before reaching trial.

Teper, who tracks police-reported hate crimes against the Jewish community, says nearly half of roughly 100 recent cases have been handled that way. He and Direnfeld explain how Crown prosecutors make those decisions — and why they warn the pattern risks sending a message of impunity to those who would commit crimes.

Related stories:

Read the ALCCA brief on the real problem behind the Toronto synagogue attacks.
Learn why the National Post counted 94 of 154 Toronto protestors cases stayed, dropped or absolute discharges since Oct. 7, 2023.
Read why B’nai Brith Canada thinks Ontario needs to start now to ban the 2027 Al-Quds Day rally, in The CJN.

Credits

Host and writer: Ellin Bessner ( @ebessner )
Production team: Zachary Kauffman (senior producer), Andrea Varsany (producer), Michael Fraiman (executive producer), Alicia Richler (editorial director)
Music: Bret Higgins

Support our show

Subscribe to The CJN newsletter
Donate to The CJN (+ get a charitable tax receipt)
Subscribe to North Star (Not sure how? Click here )
Watch our podcasts on YouTube.
Help others find this podcast by leaving us a review for “North Star” on Apple Podcasts via your iPhone or iPad device, or with your Android. (Spotify allows only starred ratings but you can do that, too!)

After Synagogue Shootings, Legal Experts Warn Dropped Charges Fuel ‘Impunity’