← The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
Buck Brief - Why Do Democrats Coddle Islamic Terrorists?
00:18:27
Loading summary
Transcript28 lines
- [00:00]
A
This is an iHeart podcast, Guaranteed Human.
- [00:04]
B
It's time for a little spring cleaning. And we know right where to start. Find your old dated wireless contract in your file drawer and wipe the dust off with a rag. Then freshen things up by switching to Pure Talk, the wireless company we both trust. Pure Talk gives you unlimited talk text and plenty of data for just 25 bucks a month.
- [00:24]
C
Just go to PureTalk.com buck and save 50% off your first month. That's PureTalk.com buck to switch to PureTalk, you're listening to the Buck Sexton show podcast. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Okay, so in New York City, there's an anti Islamic terrorism protest and Islamic terrorists show up, throw a bomb at people. And the big problem that our media seems to have is with the protesters who they say said mean things. They said the mean things. Ok, what's really going on here? First time on the show, Jade Warwick joins us. Cultural warrior, Western political commentator. You see her on Newsmax, you see her all over the place online. Jade, welcome, welcome. So you know, you can also bring the British perspective to this a little bit because you guys have your own Islamo fascist issues to, to un, unspool. But let's just start with this one. When you see that a lot of people this country in the media immediately jump to the conclusion that the biggest problem isn't the bomb throwers, but the people who said the mean things, does that surprise you?
- [01:44]
A
No, they're just becoming like the United Kingdom. You know, everyone has white guilt and colonizer guilt and that is the seed of the problem, I believe.
- [01:54]
C
So they like go, go into that a little bit more though. So in the uk, I know that there's, first of all, you don't really have free speech. Right. So people, let me ask you, are these videos where you see people getting arrested for posting on Facebook, like we've let too many Islamic radicals into the country or whatever. Those are real, right? These people are actually being arrested by sort of meek sounding but authoritarian in their intention, police officers.
- [02:25]
A
Yes. So it's around 12,000 Brits per year are arrested for their online speech. And there are several UK laws that restrict free speech, one being the terrorism act of 2000 and 2006, the Radical and Religious Hatred act of 2006, Online Safety Act 2023, that's a recent one. Malicious Communications act of 1988, Communications act of 2003 and the Public Orders act of 1986. Now, those are all anti speech. They restrict. And the only legal protections for. For speech are the Human Rights act of 1998 and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is not absolute and the restrictions outweigh the protections.
- [03:14]
C
Yes, I. That seems to be the case when you have people who are getting in trouble and getting sent to prison. Even for Facebook posts, Facebook posts that aren't calling for violence or anything like that. They're just saying things that are naughty. Under the UK framework of you can't offend some people, I'm sure you could say in the. Has anyone in the UK been arrested for, you know, white people are terrible and need to apologize always and forever for their terribleness. Like you can say that, right? You just, you can't talk about Muslims, you can't talk about nonwhite people in any context whatsoever, or else you can be arrested.
- [03:50]
A
Yes, well, nationalism, especially white nationalism, is classed as a far right extremist movement and actually is under the PREVENT act in the United Kingdom. So if you speak out about white replacement or being pro western, pro white, you're actually considered a terrorist in the uk. And you know, I live in America now, so I often speak out against these, you know, communication acts. And I'm very pro Western. And if it wasn't for being an American being protected by the constitution, if I went back to the uk, they would arrest me. If I lived in the uk, I'd be in prison now.
- [04:33]
C
That's astonishing. Have you by any chance seen. You might appreciate this even if you haven't seen it. Have you seen the. I think it's Apple TV made it, but Slow Horses about MI5, it's a series about the, you know, British MI5. I. So that doesn't really matter. But what does matter is in the first season, the bad guys are, no surprise, white nationalists in the UK who capture and then threaten to behead a brown guy, which. Has that ever happened in the United Kingdom? Have there ever. Actually, I know it's happened the other way. We've seen the videos. But I thought that was fascinating that, that the main bad guy that MI5 has to deal with in this, you know, hugely expensive Gary Olson is in it. You know, the sort of top, not Hollywood production, but, you know, top sort of media, cultural production, are a group called the Sons of Albion. And they're like a bunch of British guys who talk like this and like, I get out of my country, I'm like really stupid and bigoted and that's, that's the bad Guy is that pretty. And they do cut someone's head off, by the way, spoiler alert. They actually do cut someone's head off. So yeah, you're, I'm like, that seems a little bit weird to me. I, I, I've, I haven't seen those videos before.
- [05:49]
A
Never heard of that. I have seen plenty of ISIS beheading videos.
- [05:52]
C
Yeah.
- [05:53]
A
Islamic extremists and jihadis beheading white people and Brits actually, no. So that absolutely makes no sense. But if it's a BBC production, then it is state fund funded by the government. You got to look at who runs the government. That's the question.
- [06:08]
C
Is the BBC as awful in the British context as CNN is in America? Like, did you see this thing where we had CNN here about this terror attack that just happened? Now, the bomb didn't go off, but it had shrapnel packed into it. I mean they were trying to kill people, right? They just weren't good at making a bomb. Thankfully it had tatp, which is a homemade peroxide based explosive. So they really were trying to kill people. And the biggest outrage that I've seen is the lack from people on the Democrat side, the lack of calling out the mean words by the protesters. I don't even know what they were saying other than we think there are too many Islamic radicals. No one ever stops for the irony as well of there's a protest about too many Islamic radicals and Islamic radicals show up to blow them up. That seems to be kind of a self fulfilling prophecy. Right?
- [07:00]
A
It's ironic, but I mean the left, the extreme left are always going to make excuses for them. So we just have to ignore them and focus on what we can do to change it. But you know, regarding calling them naughty words, Britain has set a new definition for anti Muslim hostility. So it further restricts your free speech. And so basically the UK government has defined it as prejudice, hatred or bigotry directed at individuals or groups based on their Muslim identity. So if you go out and you say, hey, the British Grape Gang inquiry is horrendous and the majority of the perpetrators were Muslims from Pakistan, you could get in trouble for that, you might even get arrested. And it is problematic because the wording is so vague of this new law because political Islamist figures and jihadis are also Muslim. So they could argue in a complaint to the police that what you said online offends them and you can get arrested.
- [08:05]
C
So yeah, I'd have to wonder like if I'm a British citizen and people are saying, well, this is Britain Yeah, but America, Britain, there's a lot of cultural crossover similarity. Our closest ally, really, or maybe Canada and Britain together. Um, and, and you sit here and you say, if this is happening there, it can obviously happen here. I think it's, there are some similar restrictions that are certainly in place in Canada for things like the trans community. Like you can't miss, as a matter of law, you can't use the wrong pronouns. You get in trouble in, in Canada. So there's, there's some similarity there. Actually, I want to ask you about the, I guess the, the Rotherham case, which I think far more Americans should know about this because it shows the extent to which the left wing mentality in Britain, in America, when it comes to non white immigrant groups, the extent that they're willing to go to cover up something that's going on. And so we'll talk about that in a second. But first up here, our sponsor is Birch Gold. And if you think back to 20 years ago, George W. Bush is president, 2006, if you took $20,000 from your savings account back then and put it into gold, that would be about 33 ounces or so back then. And then you fast forward to today, that 33 ounces of gold will be worth $165,000. Forward thinking. Americans have been diversifying a portion of their savings into precious metals for years now. It just makes sense. Look at gold, up 65% last year, up 700% over the last 320 years. Birch Gold Group is who I buy my gold from and it's who you should reach out to to learn more about gold, including holding gold in a tax sheltered retirement account. Birch Gold can help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA in gold. Just text my name, Buck to 989898. Receive your free info kit on gold. There's no obligation, just useful information. Text my Name Buck to 9898 98. Text Buck to 9898 98. All right, Jade, again, I know that some of the mostly us audience obviously listening to the show, they'll be familiar with the Rotherham case somewhat, but I think that people aren't familiar with the fact that there were. I don't like this term grooming gang. I think that that is a euphemism. These were systematic rape gangs of in many cases prepubescent or just basically 12, 13 year old girls in that age range, incredibly young, obviously incredibly immoral and illegal. You know, illegal in the uk, illegal in the United States, and a Heinous crime. And the part. There's that part of it. But then the authorities didn't want to touch this. Children are being systematically. And this was over a course of years. Right. I mean, can you give a little background on just what happened? Because I think it goes to the extent of how much people are willing to lie on the left in order to promote the DEI open borders, diversity is our strength narrative.
- [11:14]
A
Mm. Yes, of course. It's a horrendous case. It's actually a group of cases. Some of them go back to the 50s and 60s and the girls were as young as six or seven years old in some cases. Those are not higher reportings because we focus more on the modern cases. So we have areas in the United Kingdom where we have an influx of refugees, asylum seekers, immigrants. They have not integrated and they've set up grooming gangs. I don't like that term either, but that's what the government.
- [11:45]
C
I think they're. I mean, I just to be clear to me, they're rape gangs. That's what these are, rape gangs. They're raping little. Little children. Keep going.
- [11:52]
A
Yes, no, that's exactly right. And what we look at with the rape gang inquiry is we'll change it to rape gang inquiry now because we're going to set the new tone. There were systemic and institutional failures, so the police and the authorities were aware of what was going on and they were aware of who the perpetrators were. However, they were mainly Muslims, mainly Pakistanis. And there's a long history of, you know, racism in the uk. The van guys being like, oh, it's the Pakis. And that's sort of like an N word there. So the authorities and the police didn't want to investigate it and brushed it under the rug because they didn't want to be called racist. They feared those accusations because being called racist is worse than raping a child.
- [12:45]
C
Unbelievable. And the police reports and the court transcripts that I've seen are quite clear that there were within the chain of command of the police. Just so everyone's clear, there are always these concerns of, well, you know, what are we gonna. We can't really let the public get a hold of the fact that these are hundreds of Pakistani origin men who have come to the UK who are violating, who are raping hundreds. I think it was actually thousands of. When they add up all these cases, right, it's in the thousands of young British girls. I mean, truly girls who are very, very young. 10, 11, 12, 13 years old. And the kind of thing that In America honestly would get. If people heard about that sort of thing, they. You'd see a lot of conversation online about, you know, we need to have the death penalty for people that commit these kinds of crimes against children. I mean, the level of outrage would be and should be extreme. And in the uk, people were. Cops were covering this up. Where does it stand with the inquiry now? Are there any conservatives in Parliament who have any backbone to really get into this and show the British people and really the whole Western world that this sort of thing does still shock the conscience in a way that government action will come from it? I mean, where does that stand?
- [14:08]
A
So there was the attempt to reinquire to into the rape gang grooming scandal. It was voted down in Parliament. So what that means is the left and the right all vote in one big room. They're screaming at each other. And the Labour Party, who are the Liberal Democrats, they voted against re inquiring and doing a deeper search into this scandal again because they didn't want to be seen as racist. So they have let down the victims and the victims families time and time again. I don't think the government wants to look into this at all.
- [14:45]
C
It's astonishing. You know, there's so much outrage in this country and right, again, rightly so about the Epstein cover up this stuff, the cases in Rotherham because a police turned a blind eye to it. It was hundreds of men, it was incredibly young girls. It was systematic, it was violent. When you read these, honestly, the transcripts turn your stomach what these guys were doing to these young girls. I can't believe that there's not people out in the streets. I mean just everyday Brits out in the streets with placards demanding justice. I mean, I'll see people in the streets with placards demanding more, you know, Muslim immigration to the uk, but I won't see anyone demanding justice for this.
- [15:31]
A
So there was a Unite the Kingdom march last year and there will be another one, I believe in a month led by Tommy Robinson and a bunch of people like Katie Hopkins. And it is a anti immigration, pro Western march. So we kind of use that as an umbrella march, an umbrella protest.
- [15:49]
C
So there were a lot of people at that. The attendance on it was. I just would note, see, I don't even know. But could you think that that was covered in American in like the sort of traditional American media here? Of course not. They're not. You think CNN was like the British people rising up in defense of their borders and their sovereignty?
- [16:07]
A
No, that didn't happen in Fact, the BBC, as they always do, lied about the numbers. I was there. I actually got extracted by my security team when the pro Palestinian rioters were breaking down the backstage area. So my security guard took me through the main crowd and he's fantastic. Will get us. Definitely have him on your show in the future. I think he was on Megyn Kelly actually recently, but we were walking through these crowds and I could tell you millions. I believe there are around 2 to 3 million people marching.
- [16:42]
C
Well, I'm happy to hear that there is at least some awakening in the UK about what is going on culturally in that country, and I think it's happened here too, thanks to Trump and maga. But it's interesting to see how on the Islamic terrorism issue, specifically, the left in this country is still. They're really on there. I mean, whether it's Hamas that the left has never, the American left, the Democrat Party has never seen an Allahu Akbar, I'm going to go blow myself or other people or both up terrorists that they didn't have some feelings of warmth towards. So it's something very, very troubling to see. Our sponsor here is PureTalk. Look, there's got to be a good reason to switch from one cell phone service to another. I switched to PureTalk years ago and the cell phone service is clear, it's consistent, the best nationwide 5G network available as well. But they simply have the best customer service and they align with your values. Now, Pure Talk gives you unlimited talk, text and plenty of data for just 25 bucks a month. No contract, no cancellation fees. It's time for you to make the switch. Go online to puretalk.com buck. Save 50% off your first month. That's puretalk.com/buck. When you do, you'll save 50% off the first month when you switch from your wireless to Pure Talk. Jay, before we let you go, what's your background? Because your first time, a lot of people listening to you and seeing you here will, I think, be coming across your analysis. You are a culture warrior and political commentator, but how'd you get into this? And what should people know about the Warwick Report?
- [18:12]
A
Well, thank you for having me on again. This has been really fun. I'm from the UK, I'm from Wales, I left school at 16. I'm just a regular person. Started modeling, ended up getting signed in America, been here for 10 years, just became a citizen and I decided to speak out against the hypocrisies and controversies in the United Kingdom because from the US and with my protections under the Constitution. I'm one of the very few people who can raise awareness without going to prison for it. So that's what I do. I like to promote pro Western values. And, yeah, bring certain stories to light that mainstream media will refuse to cover.
- [18:54]
C
Go check out the Warwick Report. And Jade, great to have you. We'll talk to you again soon.
- [18:59]
A
Thank you so much. This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.