Daily Review With Clay and Buck - Jun 02 2025

Summary

Summary of "Daily Review With Clay and Buck - Jun 02 2025"

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show released its June 2, 2025 episode, delivering a robust discussion covering international conflicts, domestic terrorism, educational policies, and fiscal legislation. Host Clay Travis, while on vacation, navigated the episode alongside Buck Sexton, maintaining the show's characteristic blend of intelligence and humor.

---

1. Ukraine’s Strategic Drone Assault on Russia

[02:40 - 10:00]

Clay Travis opens the discussion with a significant update on the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. He highlights Ukraine’s sophisticated drone attack that successfully targeted and destroyed dozens of Russian bombers. Describing the operation as “spectacular” and comparable to Hamas's tactics, Travis underscores the surprise element and the substantial military damage inflicted on Russian forces.

Clay Travis [02:45]: "It was a spectacular attack in the sense of caught the Russians very much by surprise. A lot of damage done and military targeting."

Buck Sexton adds context by comparing it to historical intelligence operations, emphasizing the strategic prowess behind Ukraine’s actions.

---

2. Colorado Terror Attack and Immigration Enforcement

[10:00 - 22:00]

The conversation shifts to a tragic incident in Boulder, Colorado, where an individual on a tourist visa perpetrated a terrorist attack during a pro-hostage demonstration. Eight people were injured when the assailant, identified as Mohammed Salman, hurled incendiary devices and incited with anti-Semitic rhetoric.

Clay Travis [15:00]: "A maniac lit people on fire at a peaceful vigil for hostages because some illegal alien maniac was in the country."

Travis criticizes the current administration for its immigration policies, arguing that inadequate enforcement allows dangerous individuals to remain in the country, posing security risks. He stresses the importance of swift deportation of criminal aliens to prevent such incidents.

---

3. Gender Identity in Sports: Legal and Social Implications

[22:00 - 35:00]

A significant portion of the episode features an in-depth interview with Julie Hamill, president of the California Justice Center, discussing the contentious issue of gender identity in sports. Hamill critiques California’s AB 1266, which mandates that students compete in sports aligning with their gender identity rather than biological sex, arguing it subverts Title IX’s original intent of sex-based protections.

Julie Hamill [22:38]: "It completely subverts Title IX. It does the opposite of what Title IX was supposed to do by allowing males into the female spaces, into female sports."

Clay Travis probes further into the legal ambiguities surrounding gender identity, questioning how one can legally define gender if it is based solely on self-identification without biological verification. Hamill responds by highlighting the need for federal legislation to clarify Title IX, insisting that current state policies are "Orwellian" and undermine the foundational principles of sex-based equality.

Clay Travis [30:04]: "How could you codify gender identity without it being so vague that it could be anything?"

Julie Hamill [30:45]: "It's a nebulous concept that is ever changing. It's not immutable. It's not going to be protected by the Supreme Court and equal protection cases because it's not an immutable characteristic."

The discussion underscores the growing divide over gender identity policies in education and athletics, reflecting broader national debates.

---

4. Fiscal Legislation: The Big Beautiful Bill

[35:00 - 66:00]

The episode transitions to a conversation with Oklahoma Senator Mark Wayne Mullen regarding the "Big Beautiful Bill," a significant deficit-reduction and fiscal responsibility measure championed by the Trump administration. Senator Mullen elaborates on the bill’s aim to cut $1.6 trillion from deficit spending immediately, compared to the standard decade-long approach of previous budgets.

Senator Mullen [55:22]: "The House bill cuts $1.6 trillion from deficit spending... This is $1.6 trillion cutting immediately."

Travis and Buck Sexton engage with Mullen on the challenges of passing the bill through Senate reconciliation, which requires a simple majority of 51 votes. They discuss internal GOP dynamics, including differing opinions from Senators Rand Paul and Ron Johnson, who express concerns over including a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase within the bill.

Senator Mullen [58:42]: "We have to negotiate with Chuck Schumer and the Democrats to get them to give us seven or maybe even more votes."

Mullen remains optimistic about achieving the bill’s passage, emphasizing the necessity of balancing the budget through innovation, sound policy, and responsible spending. He paints a picture of long-term fiscal health by projecting a potential budget balance within three years if the Trump-era policies are sustained.

---

5. Supporting Veterans and Celebrating Bravery

[66:00 - 71:24]

Interspersed with discussions are promotions for the "Medal of Honor" podcast hosted by J.R. Martinez, celebrating U.S. military heroes who have exhibited extraordinary bravery and sacrifice.

J.R. Martinez [71:10]: "These are stories about people who have distinguished themselves by acts of valor going above and beyond the call of duty."

---

6. Closing Remarks and Final Promotions

[71:24 - End]

The episode concludes with Buck Sexton promoting the prize picks app for NBA Finals enthusiasts and briefly reiterating the support for the "Medal of Honor" narratives.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Clay Travis [02:45]: "It was a spectacular attack in the sense of caught the Russians very much by surprise. A lot of damage done and military targeting."
• Clay Travis [15:00]: "A maniac lit people on fire at a peaceful vigil for hostages because some illegal alien maniac was in the country."
• Julie Hamill [22:38]: "It completely subverts Title IX. It does the opposite of what Title IX was supposed to do by allowing males into the female spaces, into female sports."
• Senator Mullen [55:22]: "The House bill cuts $1.6 trillion from deficit spending... This is $1.6 trillion cutting immediately."
• Senator Mullen [58:42]: "We have to negotiate with Chuck Schumer and the Democrats to get them to give us seven or maybe even more votes."
• Julie Hamill [30:45]: "It's a nebulous concept that is ever changing. It's not immutable. It's not going to be protected by the Supreme Court and equal protection cases because it's not an immutable characteristic."

---

Conclusion

The June 2, 2025, episode of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show provided listeners with a comprehensive analysis of critical global and domestic issues. From Ukraine's military strategies and the implications of a recent terror attack in Colorado to the heated debate over Title IX and gender identity in sports, the hosts delivered their insights with clarity and conviction. Additionally, discussions on fiscal policy with Senator Mark Wayne Mullen highlighted the intricacies of passing significant budgetary reforms in a polarized political landscape. The episode reinforced the show's commitment to addressing pressing topics with a blend of seriousness and engaging discourse.

Transcript

[Clay Travis]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Buck Sexton]

Step into the world of power, loyalty, and luck.

[Joe Getty]

I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse.

[Buck Sexton]

With family. Cannolis and spins mean everything.

[Joe Getty]

Now you want to get mixed up in the family business.

[Buck Sexton]

Introducing the [e-mail] test your luck in.

[Clay Travis]

The shadowy world of the Godfather slots. Someday, I will call upon you to.

[Joe Getty]

Do a service for me.

[Buck Sexton]

Play the Godfather [e-mail] Welcome to the family.

[Joe Getty]

No purchase necessary VGW Group void where prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions apply.

[Mark Wayne Mullen]

Made in America means something to us. When you invest 700 billion annually in American companies and the 13 million workers and families they support, you're investing in the success of Main Street. That's money powering growth in manufacturing, tech, energy and innovation. And it starts with private equity backing American ambition. Learn how private equity keeps American businesses [e-mail] paid for by the American Investment Council.

[J.R. Martinez]

The Medal of Honor is the highest military decoration in the United States. Recipients have done the improbable, the unexpected, showing immense bravery and sacrifice in the name of something much bigger than themselves.

[Joe Getty]

This medal is for the men who.

[Clay Travis]

Went down that day on Medal of Honor.

[J.R. Martinez]

Stories of courage. You'll hear about these heroes and what their stories tell us about the nature of bravery. Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

[Buck Sexton]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand? We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and tedious and depressing and makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Clay Travis]

He's Joe Getty.

[Buck Sexton]

We're Armstrong and Getty. We try to bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Clay Travis]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Buck Sexton]

We have a win.

[Clay Travis]

Yes.

[Buck Sexton]

Listen to Armstrong. You geti on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Clay Travis]

Every day, local businesses open their doors with more than just a plan. They bring persistence, ambition, and a vision for what's next. And America's banks bring the tools and strategic guidance to get there. From storefronts on Main street to warehouse floors, businesses are leading the way with support from banks. Banks are providing what it takes for businesses to operate today and plan for tomorrow. Building opportunity, fueling economic growth. Paid for by United for a Strong Economy.

[Buck Sexton]

Welcome to today's edition of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton show podcast.

[Clay Travis]

Welcome, everybody. To the Monday edition of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton show. It kicks off right now. Thank you so much for being here. As you know, Clay on vacation. He's having a great time. Checked in with him this morning. He'll be back with us on Friday. So it's just me for the next few days. Buck, I will refrain from speaking again in the third person. Thank you for being here as always. And we've got a lot of news stories. Honestly, today is one of these days. We are stacked. I've also got some great guests lined up. I'll tell you more about that in a bit, though. They're in the second and third hours. You have Ukraine says that it hit dozens of Russian bombers in a really sophisticated drone attack. I'll take you through some of that. People are calling this Ukraine's Hezbollah pager moment. Not sure it's. Well, actually, this pretty, I was going to say it's not quite as sophisticated, but it's pretty close. It was a spectacular attack in the sense of caught the Russians very much by surprise. A lot of damage done and military targeting. We shall discuss that. We've got the champion, this, this young, young man. And this is going to be tough, but we have to just speak about this. But actually it's not tough. I was going to say we'll just speak about this the way that we should because it's what is factual. A young man has won the California track state championship for women. And there was a clip, I'm going to walk you through this. A clip on CNN or a segment on CNN where a attorney and the president of the California Justice Center, Julie Hamill, goes through piece by piece with a CNN anchor who is effectively delusional. I mean, calling this person her and she. And what about her feelings and all this stuff for the biological male who just beat all the girls in California in track. And this is a violation of federal law. This is a violation of common sense. And when you hear this exchange, I think you will find it is remarkably illuminating about how the left is not backing down on this stuff. And the left is insane. They have not moved away from this issue. So we shall, we shall dive into that. But you know, first up, I just finished watching a few moments ago they were talking about a major ice operation underway. Major ICE operation underway, or rather that it's still underway. But they've had initial results in 1500 High value target criminal aliens who are in the country. Now. Remember, these aren't just people who are here illegally. These are people who are here illegally and do bad things and break the law and prey on their. On Americans and their fellow human beings. So these are the top priorities that exist out there for enforcement when it comes to immigration and deportation operations. They call that Operation Patriot. They had, I think, somebody from the ICE office in Boston talking about this, but this is absolutely essential. One of the things that I love about this administration is they aren't just stopping the crazy stuff that the other side, or rather refraining from doing the same crazy stuff that the Democrats were doing. Yes, that's an improvement. But they're also saying, hold on a second, that's illegal. We're not going to allow you. We're going to stop you from doing the crazy things, whether it's the transgender, you know, men and women sports stuff, or now this sanctuary city complete, you know, forgetting about the rule of law stuff on immigration and the reasons for this. Or rather, we got a reminder of how important this is with this attack in Colorado that happened. Let me give you what the situation, what the situation is. A, A guy went to. This was in Boulder, Colorado on Sunday. A guy yells free Palestine and threw incendiary devices into this crowd in Boulder, Colorado. There was a demonstration to remember the Israeli hostages who remain in Gaza. So think about this for a moment. There's a group of people who have gotten together to just stand in solidarity with and remind the public about the fact that there are still hostages who are being held by Hamas, which I would also remind everybody, violation of Geneva Convention. It's a war crime itself. It's a decision that they have made. These are terrorists. These are terrorists. They have hostages that are dying and that they've killed in their cap. In their custody, and they have more, and they refuse to give them back because they are terrorists and they are the enemies of civilization. And do not forget that Hamas is an enemy of civilization anywhere in the world and should be treated as such. I do not view Hamas as distinct or different from a group like Al Qaeda. I think that they share the baseline ideology that makes them as vicious as they are and why they. It is as necessary as it is to, to meet them on the battlefield and to destroy them. That's how I view Hamas. I don't. I don't want to sit around and talk about, oh, maybe there's some future where Hamas is not going to be so crazy. Anyway, so there's this demonstration taking place in Boulder, Colorado for Israeli hostages, and this lunatic runs up to them and you had eight people who were transported to the hospital. He threw Incendiary devices, I assume something like a. Like a Molotov cocktail, some sort of incendiary device like that. And people were burned and they had to be taken directly to the hospital as a result. Yeah, burns on their legs, badly burned on most of her. One of them appeared to be badly burned on most of her body. Wrapped in a flag by a bystander. I mean, horrific. Trying to. Lighting people on fire. That's what this maniac did. He lit people on fire at a. Let's remember the hostages. Think about the psychological damage that these hostages and their families are still going through any day. Some savage from Hamas could execute them. If it's a woman in custody, we know what they've been doing to women in custody. I mean, these people are barbarians. Barbarians. And there is a gathering of those who want to remind all of us of what's going on here. You know, the pro Hamas, pro Gaza, Free Palestine maniacs that are out there, they hate talk of the hostages because what they really want is this pretense of they have the moral high ground. There's a genocide in Gaza. Maybe the. Maybe the quote, unquote, genocide, it is not a genocide, but maybe the. What they call genocide would stop if Hamas would just give back the hostages that it has in its. And it could do so tomorrow. It could have done so at any point since it started this war. And Hamas did start this war, as we know, with October 7th. So that brings me to this individual who it turns out was here on a tourist visa. Fox News was the first that I saw reported this. He was authorized to stay till February 2023. Stayed in the country illegally, applied for asylum, received a work permit which was valid through March of 2025. Stayed in the country illegally. That's something that we have to remind ourselves of here. So we just suffered a terrorist attack from an illegal. That's what happened. That's not the way that the. Here you go. Here you go. Here's how Reuters. Here's how Reuters covers this. I just told you what really happened. An illegal who yelled free Palestine and lit people on fire engaged in a anti Semitic terrorist attack on US Soil. And he was only here because he had evaded our immigration laws. You know, Trump has been talking about this all along. Yet another moment where you say, oh, wow, Trump is right that we have risks. We have risks to our security that come from these individuals, that come from these individuals who enter illegally or stay illegally after legal entry, which is the case here. And that this is unacceptable. And one of the reasons they're such a risk. It's not just that they break the law. We don't know who they are. They are effectively off radar. Once they stay beyond their allowed time or once they enter illegally, we don't know what they're up to. We don't know what they're doing. And now you have people who had to be rushed to the hospital after being lit on fire at a peaceful vigil for hostages because some illegal alien maniac was in the country. Suspect named as Mohammed Salman. Yeah, that's the suspect's name. So eight people injured in this. In illegal engaged in a terrorist attack. A reminder of why it is so important and so urgent to get criminal illegals out of this country as quickly as possible. Because we've allowed a lot of maniacs like this one to come into the country. And you could say, oh, what they always do is they try to get you to focus on the people that are. That just want a better life for themselves. And, well, the problem is we can't just allow people who want a better life for themselves to come into the country at will, because then this country would cease to exist. We can't handle it. It wouldn't be America anymore. It would be something else. And Democrats want to turn it into that as quickly as they can. And there's a whole bunch of reasons why we can get into the psychology behind that. But in the meantime, we are here saying, and the Trump administration is saying, enough, enough. Eight people lit on fire at a protest by this maniac. It's appalling. And it shows you how critical it is that Trump's work and the administration's work continues on this. And then you have the true imbeciles over places like cnn, where I used to be a terrorism analyst. And I was always right. You know what my record was for saying this is jihadist terrorism. And it turned out to be jihadist terrorism, 100%. In fact, they had people that they brought on TV. This is a true story. They brought me on TV once at CNN to analyze terror attack because I had worked at a little place called the CIA Counterterrorism center. And they actually brought on some other expert to disagree with me. I don't remember some academic or something. And it came out while we were on the air. This is true. Came out while we were on the air. That. Yeah, no, actually there was like a jihad manifesto, the whole thing, but they don't care. The point is they want to feel good about themselves for thinking this isn't a Muslim jihadist. Thing. This is some other thing. I don't want to jump to conclusions. We may never know the motive. We may never know the motive. Here's former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe and Harvard professor Juliette Kayem. She's a true. She was the one I was talking about last week. I'll just tell you that. She's a true imbecile, Teaches at Harvard. Imbecile. Here they are. This is them on the CNN panel after this attack Play seven. It's hard to imagine that the FBI has more or better information at this point to kind of rush out with the conclusion within like, 10 minutes after we all started hearing about this, that it's a targeted act of terror. It may very well be, but most of the time, you try to be very careful about attaching that label to an attack until you have solid evidence that indicates a. A motive that would qualify as terrorism, like an act intended to intimidate a population or to change the direction of government.

[Julie Hamill]

It's not good for the community. It's not good for the potentially targeted community.

[Clay Travis]

It makes law enforcement look disorganized, and.

[Julie Hamill]

It makes the FBI look so juvenile. Like, why are you getting ahead of the police chief?

[Clay Travis]

A Muslim guy who's an illegal alien through a Molotov cocktail at a bunch of Jews at a free the hostages protest. And he yelled, free Palestine. I, I think we know what's going on here, right? I. I think we all understand why this guy did what he did. And yet they go on CNN and they say this because part of the mandate of the left, part of the mandate of the Democrat Party these days is to continue, to continue trying to help these Democrats live in an alternate universe because they're so wrong on so many things. And it's becoming more and more apparent with every day. And the Trump administration is exposing the truth and taking action in ways that it becomes unavoidable for them to have to start to look at this. So this is like their fantasy escapism of, well, we may never really know. Gee, kind of like how I knew and Clay knew that Biden had dementia. Kind of like how we knew that the Trans manifesto was going to talk about how the trans terrorist in Nashville was a maniac who hated Christians and conservatives, and it was terrorism. And they're like, we don't know. We have to wait for the. Of course we know. Of course we know. But it is better in the Democrat mind to be told something so stupid, such as we can't know, you know, the real motive or we don't know the free Palestine guy who was throwing the incendiary devices at the Jews yelling free Palestine. We don't know what's going on there. They would rather be told that than you are on the side of evil and you've been wrong on everything. That's really what's going on here. They'd rather be talked to like complete idiots than have to face the reality of you're on the wrong side, you're on the Hamas side, you're on the jihad side, you're on the enemies of civilization. Team Libs, wise up. They don't want to hear that. Now's a good time to talk to you about the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. Talk about the allies of civilization, those who are fighting for civilization. Our brothers and sisters in Israel, as we know there was this horrifying attack in Boulder, Colorado shows just how clear the anti Semitism is and how it can be lethal even in this country. And one of the eight people injured was an 88 year old Holocaust survivor. If you're helpless, or rather you feel helpless about what's happening around this country, you're not helpless. And this is what IFCJ can do. They're here to show our support for our brothers and sisters in Israel. That is the goal. That is the mission of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. The IFCJ builds bomb shelters, fortifies ambulances and emergency vehicles, donates flak jackets and other essential items. They are on the front lines and they're also feeding elderly Holocaust survivors who have no one else to care for them. When you give a gift of $45 to IFCJ, you're putting faith into action right where it's needed most. Stand up to anti Semitism and show your [e-mail] you can also call 888-488-IFCJ. That's 888-488-IFCj or. Or go to ifcj.org.

[J.R. Martinez]

The medal of Honor is the highest military decoration in the United States. Recipients have done the improbable, showing immense bravery and sacrifice in the name of something much bigger than themselves.

[Clay Travis]

This medal is for the men who.

[Joe Getty]

Went down the that day. It's for the families of those who didn't make it.

[J.R. Martinez]

I'm J.R. martinez. I'm a U.S. army veteran myself and I'm honored to tell you the stories of these heroes on the new season of Medal of Stories of Courage from Pushkin Industries and Iheart podcast from Robert Blake. The first black sailor to be awarded the medal to Daniel Daly, one of only 19 people to have received the Medal of Honor twice. These are stories about people who have distinguished themselves by acts of valor going above and beyond the call of duty. You'll hear about what they did, what it meant, and what their stories tell us about the nature of courage and sacrifice. Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast.

[Buck Sexton]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand? We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and tedious and depress you. Angry. You don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Clay Travis]

He's Joe Getty.

[Buck Sexton]

We're Armstrong and Getty. We try to bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Clay Travis]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Buck Sexton]

We have a winner.

[Clay Travis]

Yes.

[Buck Sexton]

Listen to Armstrong and Yeti on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Leon Nayfak]

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidenc.

[Buck Sexton]

Did you make a mistake in sending arms to Tehran, sir?

[Joe Getty]

No.

[Leon Nayfak]

It became known as the Iran Contra.

[Joe Getty]

Affair, and I'm not taking any more questions. In just a second, I'm going to ask.

[Leon Nayfak]

I'm Leon Nayfak, co creator of Slow Burn. In my podcast Iran Contra, you'll hear all the unbelievable details of a scandal that captivated the nation nearly 40 years ago, but which few of us still remember today.

[Joe Getty]

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane, I can't begin to tell you.

[Clay Travis]

Please do.

[Leon Nayfak]

To hear the whole story. Listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Clay Travis]

Hey, Buck. One of my kids called me an unk the other day. An Unk?

[Joe Getty]

Yep.

[Clay Travis]

Slaying, evidently. For not being hip, being an old dude. So how do we un unk you? Get more people to subscribe to our YouTube channel. At least that's what my kids tell me. That's simple enough. Just search the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton show and hit the subscribe button. Takes less than five seconds to help. Un unk me. Do it for Clay, do it for freedom. And get great content while you're there. The Clay Travis and buck Sexton Show YouTube channel. We played the highlight reel for you a few minutes ago. If you missed it, go back the first hour of playing Buck on the podcast. You'll definitely want to hear it. Julie Hamill attorney and president of the California justice center, joins us now. Julie, appreciate you making the time.

[Julie Hamill]

Thank you so much for having me.

[Clay Travis]

Now, first off, before we get into the exchange you had on cnn, which we did, I don't know if you know or if you were able to listen in before, but we did play a good more than half of it, I'd say, on the air. I watched it and it was just, it was astonishing. But also, I guess I expect it. So we'll get to that in a second. But can you just from the legal perspective, tell everybody we know this story about A.B. hernandez, biological male, competing against women. We know this stuff. What is the legal what is legally at issue here? How does Title 9 come into play? What is Gavin Newsom of California doing? What's happening on the legal front?

[Julie Hamill]

Well, long story short, Title 9 has been a federal statute since 1972, and it's been very simple. It is sex based protections for you cannot discriminate against girls and women in educational programs, including sports. And so there is supposed to be equal opportunity for women and girls in educational programs, including sports. California, back in 2013 passed this law, AB 1266, which is now education code section 221.5 F, that says schools must allow students to use the facilities and play on a sports team that aligns with their gender identity instead of sex. So that essentially turns Title IX on its head. And we've had that in place for over a decade in California now. It mirrors almost identically Biden's Title IX rule that he put in place in 2024 that was enjoined by a number of federal district courts. So those courts said in their decisions, you cannot create a regulation or a rule that completely flies in the face of what the statute says. This completely subverts Title ix. It does the opposite of what Title IX was supposed to do by allowing males into the female spaces, into female sports, into female academic programs. It's total nonsense. Any thinking sane human being can recognize it immediately, which is why I'm frankly shocked that this interview is getting so much attention because it was simply, it's just common sense. I was only saying things that most of America is thinking. And that is.

[Clay Travis]

Well, yeah, it went, it went super viral, I think, for the reason that and I'm glad that it did, Julie, over the weekend, because you are just, you are just saying in a very calm tone, and everyone heard it, we played it. Here's the reality. And the CNN anchor has this almost like otherworldly detached, but what about people who are assigned female at birth, who uses this kind of language. Like, you know, we just had Mother's Day recently. You know, this is like the Birthing People's Day phenomenon that we've heard. Like, no normal person thinks that this should be normal. And let me ask you this, taking California's policy to its logical conclusion. Let's say I was an employee in the state of California and I wanted to claim discrimination as a woman because I say that I identify as a woman. On what grounds could California tell me that I couldn't sue for sex based discrimination against me as a woman? Like how, how is it legally codified what you identify as?

[Julie Hamill]

It is actually legally codified. It's freaking nonsense. So we, in addition to AB 1266, we also have the UNRU Civil Rights act, which defines discrimination based on gender identity as a violation of California civil rights law. So it's not just in schools, it's not just adults, not just children. It's also adults. And California has literally legislated gender ideology into statute, which is so absolutely nuts. I don't think people really understand the consequences of what has been done here.

[Clay Travis]

Wait, well then take me through this because, yeah, that is so nuts. I didn't even know that they had done that. How, how do you qualify as identifying as a different gender? What has to be done? Because it can't be sex change operation, because that's actually only, you know, a pretty small percentage of these individuals.

[Julie Hamill]

It's a feeling. It's a feeling. Do you feel like a woman today? You're a woman.

[Clay Travis]

That's so. So then I'm right. So then I could, I could say I feel like a woman. I can't believe I'm saying this out loud. And I think I'm being discriminated against in my California job as a woman and I'm suing. And they would have to try to prove that I'm not actually a woman.

[Julie Hamill]

Yes, yes. That's absolute bonkers nonsense.

[Clay Travis]

I, you know, I said, what is now the next step on this? Right? Because I think the sit down that you had or the conversation you had on CNN was very illuminating. I mean, also just things like we need more study to see if biological males have a, an advantage in sports. This is, this is like members of the Communist Party or maybe even just like everyday people within the Soviet Union saying, yes, we're all starving, but the grain harvest this year was the best grain harvest in history. Like, this is that level of crazy. Because we all know that obviously the basis of men and women having segregated sports is that it wouldn't be fair if they didn't. Right. That's. Otherwise we would just have, you know, men and women, right, can apply to work in an investment bank. We don't have the men, the men position, the women position. It's different in sports because of the physical differences. So are you, are you going to bring suit? Is this going to get up to appeals? Is this going to go to scotus? Like, what happens now?

[Julie Hamill]

So there are lawsuits pending right now. The Advocates for Faith and Freedom Group out of San Diego filed a lawsuit that is pending in the Central District right now. Our U.S. attorney, Bill Aseley has filed a statement of interest. And so the government is getting involved in that one that is challenging AB 1266. I hope it goes to SCOTUS. In the meantime, though, the Trump administration is very much motivated and acting very quickly here and they are coming in with the full weight of the Department of Justice. And I believe that we will see results soon, hopefully.

[Clay Travis]

Well, what do you think about the polling? Because this came up in your conversation. What do you think about the pulling of federal funds of California does not comply with Title 9 rooted in an understanding of gender as a thing that is real, or rather men and women are things that are different and distinguishable under law.

[Julie Hamill]

Well, this is so crazy to me that the anchor with a straight face said to me that there are different interpretations of Title ix, that there are people who believe that gender identity is the thing that should be protected and not sex. So for that reason, we need to legislate this at the congressional level. We need a federal statute to clarify that Title IX is sex based, which does not include gender identity. It is your biological sex. The fact that we have to do that is absolutely, it's terrifying to me. We've reached Orwellian levels of insanity in this country. But in order to protect future generations, we have to have this spelled out in statute. Because as soon as we don't have a Republican administration, we're going to have this crazy leftist interpretation of Title 9 again and they're going to allow males to compete against girls, share facilities with girls, and there's nothing we can really do about it. So how.

[Clay Travis]

It's just my problem with this is I still come back to if they say that, and as you pointed out that in California there is a gender identity protection law, how can you legally law, you know, if somebody said buck, how can you lawfully or legally identify a man or woman? I'm like, well, we know what a Man is. We know what a woman is. Right. It's like you sit there, you go, that's a man, that's a woman. How could you identify, or rather how could you codify gender identity with. Without it excluding people who claim to be covered under gender identity or rather without it being so vague that it could be anything?

[Julie Hamill]

Well, the people at dfi, the Defense of Freedom Institute, have actually proposed model legislation for this. It's like the Protect Title 9 Act. You can go to their website and it's there. And they've done that. And they. And Bill Asale, when he was in our state legislature right before he got appointed to the US Attorney position, also introduced a bill called AB 844 which would have done the same thing.

[Clay Travis]

But that's defining men and women in law, right?

[Julie Hamill]

Yes.

[Clay Travis]

Yeah. No, what I'm saying is how could you define gender identity in law? Because it isn't a thing.

[Julie Hamill]

It's defined in various places in California statute. It's not consistent. It's always something different. And then if you look at school district policies, these different school districts throughout California have also taken a stab at trying to define it. But it is, it's a nebulous concept that is ever changing. It's not immutable. It's not going to be protected by the Supreme Court and equal protection cases because it's not an immutable characteristic. Like sex. You cannot change your sex.

[Clay Travis]

Yes. So do you think this is. To me, it feels like this just has to go to the Supreme Court and there has to be some clarifying. It's amazing. Clarifying ruling from the Supreme Court that men and women are different and we can know the difference.

[Julie Hamill]

Why do we have to do this? Why can we not have people come to their senses and start speaking rationally and having.

[Clay Travis]

Well, it feels like Democrats. Cuz you're asking a very important question, but it feels like Democrats to what you said before, they're just trying to ride this thing out until they're in power again. And then it's going to be the lunacy of. Yeah, this is the, you know, men and women's locker rooms met against women on the sports field, you know, men and women's prisons.

[Julie Hamill]

Well, in the really Orwellian part about it is that they're saying men are women, they are women. They're not.

[Joe Getty]

Right.

[Julie Hamill]

Of course they're actually women now because they say they are. These are women. And you must accept that. And if you don't accept that, you're a bigot.

[Clay Travis]

Well, have you Ever seen this is what I always tell everybody is the, is the true ultimate ends of this. There have been a few people who have tried this. You've seen like blogs or, you know, stuff on like HuffPo or the Nation or some of those, you know, communist loony bins online where they try to make the case that if you're a straight man who is not attracted to trans women, you're bigoted. Have you ever seen that? That, that bubbles up here and there. And as I point out to everybody, based on what you just said, which is that the real belief is that trans women are women, indistinguishable from women. The ultimate logic of this is there's a problem with guys who aren't attracted to trans women.

[Julie Hamill]

Yeah, it's okay. One of the most disturbing elements here is what they're doing to children. I'm laughing right now, but it's really dark. It's actually incredibly dark. And I'm on a school board out here in Palos Verdes and we had this book that we have fifth grade teachers, like, these are ten year old kids. They're being read a book called Too Bright to See, which says, it literally says in the book, a trans woman is a woman, full stop. And anything else is bigotry. And it's, that is what they're teaching little kids. It's all.

[Clay Travis]

They are teaching kids the sky is green. They're teaching kids can see. They look at the sky, it's blue. And there are books that say the sky is green. And we're supposed to accept that?

[Julie Hamill]

Yes. This is 1984 come to life.

[Clay Travis]

It is. Great. Well, Julie, I appreciate your, the work you're doing on this. What's your organization? So if anyone wants to go help donate any of that stuff.

[Julie Hamill]

So I am the president of the California Justice Center. We are supported by the California Policy center, which is a nonprofit organization. If you want to donate and support my work, that is where to go. You can find my handle on Twitter amillhamilaw.

[Clay Travis]

Well, great work keeping your cool and keeping it calm and collected while, you know, while one of the commissars was trying to go through the talking points on cnn. Appreciate you making the time for us.

[Julie Hamill]

Thank you so much.

[Clay Travis]

Look, let's talk about gold for a second here. I believe in taking the long term view and that's the best way to achieve financial security, to make smart decisions. And gold has been part of my long term plan for a long time and that's why it's worked so well. I Go back now. I think I got my first gold coin maybe 15 years ago and I've been building up my gold reserves ever since. And it's been a smart move. And this is one of these things. You know, a lot, a lot of conservatives, we talk about gold and we've been pushing gold for years. And if you look, gold's done really, really well. The gold that I bought years ago has gone up tremendously in value and gold continues to go up in value. So this is just a smart idea for the long term financial play to hedge against inflation which we could experience a little bit of a bump in that this summer. But also the only way forward with the debt that we have is going to be more printing, more printing, more printing, which means dollars will go down in value. Gold, my friends, gold is the store of value still to this day and all throughout history with the national debt we have, there is no way forward realistically other than the continued printing of dollars. And that means the money that you have in your bank account is going to be worth less. Diversifying a portion of your savings into gold so you can get that upside and get that protection. Makes sense. Text my Name Buck to 9898 98. Birch Gold Group will send you a free no obligation info kit on gold. Learn how to hold gold and silver in a tax sheltered account. Birch Gold will help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into a gold IRA for no money out of pocket. Again text my Name Buck to 9898 98. That's B U C K. Text Buck to 9898 98. Birch Gold has an A plus rating from the Better Business Bureau. Go to birchgold.com Buck, we are going to take a moment here. I'm just going to, I'm going to talk you through this. This was really interesting over the weekend, this drone attack in Ukraine that got a lot of headlines. Now keep in mind right now there is a negotiation that is happening or at least there's the beginnings of negotiations underway between Russia and Ukraine. So they're going into peace talks and it comes right in the aftermath of this, this strike. And here's what, here's what we know so far. There's a, there's a lot of footage and video of it because they, the drones relayed back in real time what they were doing. So you have footage of these attacks that are now, that have been circulated and they were hitting, they were hitting these planes on the, these Russian planes on the tarmac. Here's, here's what we know. So Ukraine got 117 drones, aerial drones, into trucks. And the trucks were Russian. And they somehow contracted with these trucks, contracted with these trucks to go to the perimeter of four Russian air bases. One of them was in Siberia. I mean, this is way far. This is a couple. This is thousands of miles from the actual Ukraine border. So way deep inside Russia, they got these drones to be on these trucks. And then the drones activated. They obviously had them on a remote control setup. The drones activated and were able to attack 40 Russian strategic bomber aircraft, which is about a little more than a third of Russia's strategic cruise missile carriers. The estimated cost of this to Russia is $7 billion. Okay. And, you know, we've got a much bigger military budget than Russia. We've got much more in the way of these kinds of strategic assets that we could. Well, we wouldn't want to have to rebuild them, but, you know, we. We have much better resourcing than they do. So you can imagine $7 billion of Russian military hardware that hurts. People have been talking about this as the pager. Remember the Hezbollah Mossad pager operation, where the pagers blew up in the hands of, or on the waist, really, of these Hezbollah operatives because they managed to get into their supply chain. And it was, as you know. I mean, I spent some time in the CIA and was aware of some pretty. Pretty remarkable CIA operations. A lot of the really good ones have been. Are public, and they've even made movies about some of them. But, you know, the CIA has done some pretty cool stuff in the past, or I should say impressive stuff. That pager operation by the Israelis is the stuff of intelligence espionage legend. This. This drone attack was. I'm just talking tactically. Impressive. All right. Whether you're worried about this, some kind of escalation or anything else, that. That's another part of the conversation. But this comes after Russia has been really escalating its military strikes on particular. I'm sorry, it strikes particularly on civilians, not on military targets. Russia has been just blowing up a lot, a lot of civilians while we're supposed to get this opening for a ceasefire. Really? That's what you need first, right? Cease fire means the guns are silent and at least you're not taking active casualties. And then you can continue to hammer out what a meaningful end of the conflict would be. You know, what a. You know, a treaty, armistice, whatever it's going to be. However you end it, you can figure it out. But first, you want to get to a ceasefire so you're not losing people. There's not bloodshed unnecessarily. But Trump has been very clear. He is deeply unhappy with Putin's response to the efforts to get him into a conversation here about ending this war. And this is. This is something that I was concerned about. Look, everyone's concerned about it. It's not easy. What Trump is trying to do here, what he's trying to accomplish would be an incredible win, but it's certainly worth trying because the alternative is that you have people dying in large numbers on the front between Russia and Ukraine to our side of things. And I try to be very clear. There's Ukrainian and Russian interests here, and there's American interests, which I am primarily concerned with. And I wish that there was no fighting going on over there, just like I wish there was no fighting going on between Israel and Hamas, and I wish there was no fighting and ethnic cleansing going on in Sudan. And, you know, this is. But we live in a nasty world, as you know, and there's no way to just snap your fingers and make these things go away. And you can't just let the bad guys go without any response. So on our side of things, though, with Russia, Ukraine, we are funding this. And yes, I know that there's the argument that's being made that we are. And this I'm uncomfortable with this argument on a number of, in a number of ways that we are bleeding Russia so that we won't have to fight them. I don't think that we have to worry about fighting Russia. Russia militarily is nowhere near what it would need to be to pose a threat to U.S. interests. I know, other than the nuclear arsenal. But we're. Russia is not looking to create a nuclear holocaust of the entire planet. I'm pretty confident in that. We are working on now, thanks to Trump, the golden dome system, which I think will give us even more peace of mind. That's, to me, more for Iran, North Korea, you know, rogue state actors, where it's not just the possibility that they may get crazy enough that they want to launch, which is there. The more you. I'll tell you this, the more you read about North Korea, I've learned a fair bit. I mean, I'm. Because I find it fascinating. It's a little bit, though. North Korea is terrifying to the point where, like, you need to go, if you really read up on it and I mean, you get into the history of it and what it's like there, you got to go for a walk in the sunshine afterwards, because it will. You kind of feel in Your soul. How could this be happening today? Today in the world? How could a place be so horrific and so crazy and such a vile tyranny? But so, yeah, the more you learn about North Korea, the more you think to yourself, well, maybe they're crazy enough to fire off a missile, but there's also the possibility that they could just lose control of the stockpile to some faction within. That's. That's even crazier. This is always the concern. And, you know, I would say if anyone is going to be able to bring about a cease fire between Russia and Ukraine, I think Trump is in the likeliest position. But this was always going to be a tough ask. I know Trump said I would end it, you know, day one or whatever. And that's Trump in the role as salesman of, look, I am the best guy for this, so let me do what I need to do and we'll get there. You know, maybe a little bit of over promising on the timeline, but that doesn't mean that Trump isn't the best guy to try to get it done. There's the possibility, and I thought this all along, that there is no ceasefire to be had because Putin thinks he's winning and there's reason for him to believe that. And he doesn't care about the casualties that he's incurring because he doesn't have to face a real election. And he thinks that this is more in the long term, strategic interest of Russia to pursue. And maybe he views himself. I think there's plenty of reason to think that he views himself in the mold of a, you know, whether it's a Stalin or a Peter the Great or one of the, one of the still very celebrated, you know, leaders, Soviet or Russian leaders of the past, who were very expansionist in their, in their ideas. Right. And what they were able to accomplish. I actually read a. I have it here. I. Yeah, it's. It's Ivan the Terrible by Payne and Romanov. I told you about North Korea. Same thing with, with reading about Ivan the Terrible. You will need to go for a walk in the sunshine if you, if you read about how crazy that guy was, really. I mean, truly sadistic in a way that is demonic. And, you know, was, was leader with leader of, of Russia. I mean, not. Wasn't really Russia was kind of like, he's a prince of Moscow. It's a little different, but still. And somebody that is thought of, I think, very clearly. In fact, you could make it. You can draw a pretty straight line between a lot of the Stalinist approach to dissent and to totalitarianism. And Ivan the Terrible setting up a really, the original totalitarian secret police known as the Oprichniki. And I write about this in my book, which is probably why I'm immediately going into this. Oprichniki were a fascinating group, horrible. They dressed in all black, they had severed dogs heads that they would have tied to their saddle just so everybody knew what they were really about. And they had complete extrajudicial detention, torture and execution authority. Anybody they wanted to kill who was in the way of the Czar that he didn't like or that they didn't like, you know, as long as it didn't make the Czar angry, it didn't matter. And Stalin, I think, figured out that this was a very effective way because Ivan the Terrible stayed in power for a long time and managed to get quite. Get quite far, actually did pretty well militarily against some of the enemies in the region. Anyway, sorry, weaving a little too much there. Back to Russia, Ukraine. So this is why you got to get the book, so you can learn, learn more about the operation. Niki. Scary guys and the fact that they had dogs heads on their saddles, man, that's an. If you want to show that somebody's an evil, you know, son of a gun, dog head on the saddle is like a very good place to start. You know, that's, that's. I'm like still angry. That was 500 years ago. I'm still angry about it. So I think that there's a chance that we'll get some kind of a ceasefire in Russia, Ukraine, but I'm not counting on it. Trump is annoyed. But back to American interests here, back to what the US Is hoping to get out of this. We don't want to continue to fund this forever, and we certainly don't want to put our own people in harm's way and suffer the possible loss of American soldiers fighting in a country that ultimately, whether it stays under Russian Federation control, or rather whether it stays under Ukrainian or Russian Federation control, does not matter that much to us. That is the harsh reality of doesn't matter enough that we're willing to die for it. Doesn't matter enough that I would want any of you, any of you listening, or any of your children or grandchildren to go fight for it. So we have that in mind with all of this, right? This is something that we have to understand that that is the red line. Not a single American, on behalf of the armed forces, our armed forces, dying over there to figure out where the final lines on the map will be drawn. But yes, it was an impressive strike by Ukraine inside of drones. It also is a window, I think, into the future of warfare, which is just going to be increasingly, I think that we reached in a sense the, a pinnacle of commando warfare. And I mean that Special Operations, JSOC, SEALs, Delta Rangers, MARSOC, all that. We reached a pinnacle of that in the war on terror because it was largely counterinsurgency operations. It was targeted strikes against individuals. You know, it was, it was gunning it out muzzle to muzzle with the bad guys. The wars of the future, I think, are going to increasingly rely on those. Obviously special operations always have a very important role, precision instrument that needs to be used the way it was intended to be used. But you're going to see a lot more of just tech, drones, AI. And everybody sees this happening. And who controls the skies is going to be a combination of who has the best autonomous tech, the best AI, the best overall drone systems and the manufacturing of them. Another reason why manufacturing capacity is going to be so important here because if China can put 10,000 drones a month in the sky and we can only put, you know, a thousand, even if ours are better, that's a big problem. So this is where I think the future, and I believe everyone sees this, the future of warfare is going to. And you're seeing a picture into it. Remember the Boer War in South Africa, South Africa discussion now, but the Boer War in South Africa, the origin of the term concentration camp and also was actually an early version of the trench warfare we saw in the first World War. You really got a sneak peek of what the first World war was going to turn into with the trench warfare based on the Boer War. We are getting a sneak peek of what nation state warfare in the future is going to be between with this look at Russia, Ukraine, but it could be of course between the US and China. And that's the big thing that we're looking at. Here are the official start to hurricane season has arrived. And you know what that means. More rain and more debris in your gutters. When your gutters are clogged, that will lead to costly damage to your home. You don't want the mess or the expense. Protect your home with Leaffilter, America's number one gutter and gutter protection company. Right now you can save up to 30% off your entire order. Go to leaffilter.com buck and get started. Leaffilters trusted pros will clean out, realign and seal your gutters before installing LeafFilters award winning and patented technology trusted by over 1 million homeowners. Schedule your free inspection and get up to 30% off your entire purchase at leaffilter.com buck that's leaffilter.com buck See your representative for warranty details.

[J.R. Martinez]

The Medal of Honor is the highest military decoration in the United States. Recipients have done the improbable, showing immense bravery and sacrifice in the name of something much bigger than themselves.

[Clay Travis]

This medal is for the men who.

[Joe Getty]

Went down that day. It's for the families of those who didn't make it.

[J.R. Martinez]

I'm J.R. martinez. I'm a U.S. army veteran myself and I'm honored to take tell you the stories of these heroes on the new season of Medal of Stories of Courage from Pushkin Industries and I Heart podcast from Robert Blake, the first black sailor to be awarded the medal. To Daniel Daly, one of only 19 people to have received the Medal of Honor twice. These are stories about people who have distinguished themselves by acts of valor going above and beyond the call of duty. You'll hear about what they did, what it meant, and what their stories tell us about the nature of courage and sacrifice. Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

[Buck Sexton]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand? We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and tedious and depressing and makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Clay Travis]

He's Joe Getty.

[Buck Sexton]

We're Armstrong and Getty. We try to bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Clay Travis]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Buck Sexton]

We have a winner. Yes, listen to Armstrong and Getty on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Leon Nayfak]

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency.

[Buck Sexton]

Did you make a mistake in sending arms to Tehran, sir?

[Joe Getty]

No.

[Leon Nayfak]

It became known as the Iran Contra.

[Joe Getty]

Affair and I'm not taking any more questions. In just a second, I'm going to ask.

[Leon Nayfak]

I'm Leon Nayfak, co creator of Slow Burn. In my podcast Fiasco Iran Contra, you'll hear all the unbelievable details of a scandal that captivated the nation nearly 40 years ago, but which few of us still remember today.

[Joe Getty]

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane, I can't begin to tell you.

[Clay Travis]

Please do.

[Leon Nayfak]

To hear the whole story. Listen to Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Clay Travis]

Third hour of Klan Buck kicks off. Now we're joined by Oklahoma Senator Mark Wayne Mullen. Senator MARK WAYNE Mullen. I'm sorry, Senator Mullen. Well, also correct. Good to have you on. Senator Buck.

[Joe Getty]

Thanks for having me on. And anything works, but you don't have to call the title Mark Wayne Mullen, Idiot, fool, all those work, I'll answer to them all.

[Clay Travis]

I believe you are an MMA fighter, so I'm going to pass on the idiot. But I will, I will definitely keep in mind that you are not one who stands on ceremony and formalities. So thank you for that. Yeah, but, but tell me this, I mean, look, we, you know, I don't know, I'm sure you know what this is like, you're United States Senator, sometimes you get a little caught in the crossfire on some things. On the one hand, we're talking, we have people from the Trump White House on, and they're talking about the big beautiful bill, the great things it will do, the boom in the economy they believe it will bring about take home pay for homes, all that stuff. The other side, we get people. We have had your colleague Senator Rand Paul on, we've had your colleague Senator Ron Johnson on. And they're saying, look, there's some great stuff, but spends too much money. Where does the big beautiful bill stand now on the Senate side? Walk us through what's going on, what you like, what maybe needs to change and what we should expect.

[Joe Getty]

Well, first of all, I mean, this bill's been getting negotiated since November, so this isn't anything new. Everybody's had, had time to put their input and they're gonna have more time to put their input. So I got all the respect in the world for Ron Johnson and Rand Paul. But the truth is their ideas are great, but it's their idea and they're going to have to get 51 people to agree with them. And so what we've got issues here is that we have Obama slash Biden era policies. And I mean that sincerely because, you know, Biden is just, you know, an extension of the Obama era policies, except worse. So you have, that's what we're currently operating underneath. And now you have the Trump policy error that's trying to come in place. And we do that through reconciliation. We all want to cut more spending. I mean, physically being fiscally responsible is honestly what we all want to do. But the House bill cuts $1.6 trillion from deficit spending and that's true deficit spending. Now, I've been up here for way too long. I served in the house for 10 years and now two years in the Senate. And I can tell you, every time, we've always had deficit cuts. It's always been a 10 year cut. Right? It's going to save 500 billion over 10 years and we never actually achieve the 10 year cut. This is $1.6 trillion cutting immediately. So it doesn't balance a budget, but it does move forward. And as we move forward with this bill, hopefully we can even do better. Hopefully we can get to $2 trillion in cuts. Except at the same time, we're trying to implement, you know, campaign promises too. And the American people want the Trump policies that he campaign on. And one of them is no tax on tips, no tax on overtime and no tax on Social Security. Well, that adds cost too. And so you gotta take it in and out. And reconciliation. We can only deal with taxes and mandatory spending, not discretionary spending. So we got a narrow window to what we can actually work with. That's why it's called reconciliation and requires 51 votes where a budget which will start on, you know, the budget just, I mean, our discretionary spending moving forward right after this. And that's a 60 vote threshold. So my point that I'm trying to get to buck is that we have a very narrow window that we can work with. We're going to get all the cuts we can possibly get at the end of the day when this bill goes to the four, one big beautiful bill that we've been working on since November and everybody's had their fingerprints on, everybody's had an opportunity to put their input on. We're going to put whatever is on the floor that can get 51 votes so we can get away from the Biden era policies and move forward to the Trump era policies, which is we're seeing the economy respond to already and we haven't even passed the bill yet.

[Clay Travis]

I wanted to have you react, Senator Mullen, to what Senator Paul says here about four Republicans who he believes will not go along with the bill as it stands. This is cut three, team. Play it team.

[H]

I think there are four of us at this point and I would be very surprised if the bill at least is not modified in a good direction. Look, I want to vote for it. I'm for the tax cuts. I voted for the tax cuts for before. I want the tax cuts to be permanent, but at the same time, I don't want to raise the debt ceiling 5 trillion so I've told if you take the debt ceiling off the bill, in all likelihood I can vote for what the agreement is on the rest of the bill. And it doesn't have to be perfect to my lightning liking, but I can't be. If I vote for the $5 trillion debt, who's left in Washington that cares about the debt? We will have lost. The GOP will own the debt once they vote for this.

[Clay Travis]

What do you make of that, Senator?

[Joe Getty]

Well, we're going to have to raise the debt. You know, it's kind of like taking over a failing business, right? When you take over a failing business, you don't just start making money day one. You have to invest in it. And that's why you bring in investors and investors are expecting you to get a return. And that's what the American people did. They invested in the Republican Party and expecting a return. But you can't just simply turn it around. The Biden administration spent like drunken sailors. You know, we had almost every, almost almost every single agency under the last four years has increased from 50 to 100% in, in what they're receiving for their budget in four years. So we're cutting everybody's budget and we're bringing down the debt. But you can't just simply say that we're going to have enough money to balance the budget immediately. We're going to have to borrow more money. And I think in two, two and a half, maybe three years, we can balance it and we won't have to borrow any money if we continue down this, the Trump policies that he's put forth. But you can't do it now. And so I don't know what Rand Paul wants us to do because we are in debt and the debt limit is going to hit us regardless of what we do if we pass this bill. We don't. It's going to hit us. And so we have two choices as Republicans. We can put the debt limit increase on reconciliation and only have to have 51 votes, meaning that we can do this without the Democrats support, or we'd wait and we do it on, on a budget bill or we do it as a standalone and we got to have 60. So now we're gonna have to negotiate with Chuck Schumer and the Democrats to get them to give us seven or maybe even more votes. And probably more than likely by the time we negotiate with them, there's going to be a lot of Republicans that aren't going to want to vote for it. And so instead of just having seven we're going to end up having to have 15 or 20 Democrats. Now, can you imagine what type of deal we'll have to strike with him? Because we're going to raise a debt limit regardless. We're going to raise a debt limit. We're going to raise it. If we raise it 4.5 trillion, I will be willing to tell you, Buck, right now we'll have to raise it again another two and a half trillion. And so I feel like we should just go ahead and raise a debt limit enough that we know if the numbers continue to grow the way they are with the GDP growing, with the debt, decrease in deficit spending because we're doing 1.6 off of discretionary or off of mandatory. And then when we start doing the budget bills, we can even do more off discretionary spending. By those two graphs, they're going to meet in about two and a half or three years and it'll be the first time that a president has balanced a budget since Clinton. But we're going to have to borrow the money to get to that point. So like I said, we can do it now and negotiate with Republicans only or we're going to do it later because there is no fee. There's either A or B, because C means with a fault. And we're not going to default on the money we spent. We spent it. Regardless. We like it or not, we spent it, so we got to pay it back.

[Clay Travis]

Speaking of Oklahoma Senator Mark Wayne Mullen and Senator Mullen, you're talking about balancing the budget in the future, not on this Big Beautiful. What is the, is the official, what is the official name of the bill? Sorry for the diversion, but I'm curious, is it going to be called the Big Beautiful Bill or is there some boring DC Name?

[Joe Getty]

Well, I'm sure we're going to come up with some ridiculous, you know, acronym because we love acronyms up here. But right now we're going to call it what the president calls it, One Big Beautiful. And by the way, he just recently had glamorous One Big Beautiful, Glamorous Bill. But we don't, I don't know what the acronym is.

[Clay Travis]

I got you. Okay. I mean, I think, I think we just go with Big Beautiful Bill personally. Everybody knows what we're talking about with that one.

[Joe Getty]

I think it makes sense. I mean, we've been.

[Clay Travis]

Yeah. And it'll drive the, it'll drive the Democrats completely insane, which makes it even more fun and more worthwhile. Right in and of itself. But for those who, because, look, I get people who call in or who write in and they're, they're upset and they start to say things like, we're just never actually going to deal with the debt. And all this talk about dealing with the debt is, is hot air. What do you say to them? I mean, at what point do we start to take the debt? Is it realistic that within the Trump administration, at some point we can actually start to take the $36 trillion debt in the other direction? Or is that just. Is the best we can hope for slowing the increase over time, maybe balancing it here and there?

[Joe Getty]

No, I think we can reverse it, but it takes, it takes three things to happen for that to happen. One, we got to have sound policy that the economy will respond to. I mean, we got to have sound policy we're going to respond to. We've got to have accurate policies that, that will drive innovation. And then, number three, the politicians, us, we have to be responsible with the taxpayer dollars. And if you do those, then the economy and the spending levels will eventually touch each other and will surpass them. If the GDP can grow right around 3% and we can hold spending at its current level after we do the reconciliation, just by doing that and not doing additional cuts, which we will do additional cuts. But if we just do those, most economists will tell you that the lines will touch in two and a half or three years, depending on the investment, how much we have. We see that inflation is down to 2.1% already. That's huge. Right? When we see the taxes become permanent, and then we see R and D, which will hopefully become permanent, research and development will come permanent where they can actually write that off. You're going to see that technology field increase here, and you're going to see the growth begin, which is exactly what you do with a business, right? You take out debt for, for potential earnings because you have a business plan. You borrow on it. The bank borrows, unless you borrow the money. Because they see your business plan and they know that your growth is going to eventually surpass enough to build a. Pay you off a debt. That's what their gamble is. Well, we feel like we're trying to operate like a business because we have a business guy in office, not just myself, but the, but President Trump himself. And we're taking a business approach to it. We know we can't just simply cut it off right now, which we are. We'd love to, but we just can't find enough to cut all the programs in this short period of time. The more we dig into them the more Doge continues to dive in, the more we continue to dive in and see all the waste and fraud that has been taking place in the government, the more we'll continue to cut. And I feel, I mean it sincerely, this is the first time that I've ever been up here that I feel very, very confident that we will balance the budget. And the president has made it his plan that that's what he wants. When he's sat down and talked to us, especially those that have a relationship with him, this is. This is part of his make America great again. He understands how to make money, but he also understands debt and how it works.

[Clay Travis]

Senator, before we let you go and take a hard turn here and to just curiosity Ville, you were an MMA fighter for how many years?

[Joe Getty]

Well, I fought for three years, but before that we were, you know, we weren't considered professionals. Right. So there was additional fights too, but, you know, I wasn't as good as a lot of these other guys out there that everybody knows.

[Clay Travis]

Who do you think's the best of all time? You know, because. Because you've been in that arena, literally inside that cage, Right? Who do you think is the best all time? I'm just curious.

[Joe Getty]

Boy, you got to go way back. You got to talk about Jon Jones. Jon Jones is just. Even though he's had personal issues, the guy has just been a beast. And people call him the Goat just because he's had, you know, some issues. I still think the guy was just the most dangerous man that stepped in the ring. I mean, the guy is just a stud. But when you start looking at some of these old school guys, Randy Couture, for instance, I mean, here this guy comes in, he wins, you know, he wins two different divisions as a world titles for the ufc, I think he ended up winning five total altogether. I'm trying to pull that off top of my head. Randy's actually a friend of mine. He's gonna be upset that I can't remember his record, but the guy was just absolutely unbelievable. He came in and made some fights and fought up on up, up weights that most people didn't expect him to be able to do. He embarrassed Ken Shamrock. I mean, earlier spanked his butt. And Ken is a guy that I trained with some. So I. And you just. There's just a whole host. It just depends on the year that you want to get to. Right. You can. There's a whole bunch of guys that's come in there. Daniel Cormier, dc, Which people talk about. Everybody underestimated him. And he did. He did just phenomenal work in there. And he didn't look like he ever belonged in the division. But, but you got. At one time you had a big rig. What was his name? Johnny Hendrix, who was walking through everybody, right. And, and at that, at that time. But now, could he compete with today's fighters? That's what the day's fighters are so much better talented than we ever were. Back then, we were just a bunch of bankers. Now these guys, they've been. They grew up in the, in the field.

[Clay Travis]

One more lightning round. Quick. Just quick for kind of related best martial arts movie of all time in your mind.

[Joe Getty]

Bloodsport.

[Clay Travis]

That is the correct answer. All right, he got it. Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, everybody. Senator, appreciate you making the time. Come back soon.

[Joe Getty]

All right, See you. Bye.

[Clay Travis]

The NBA championships are here, or at least they'll be here on Thursday. Prize Picks continues to be the app you want to have handy as the NBA Finals go off. Look, now I can place my picks dispassionately because my beloved Knicks, so sad, so sad. They're gone. They could not get it done against the Pacers, but the Pacers are squaring off against the Oklahoma City Thunder. And I'm going to have to decide who I'm going to put my picks with. Join Prize Picks, America's number one daily fantasy app, available to play in more than 40 states, including California and Texas. Download the Prize Picks app today. Use my name, Buck, as your promo code. Since Clay's out this week, maybe I'll give you my pick for the first game. How about that? And you can, you can, you can ignore it or you can roll with it. I'll. I'll put out a pick. Darn it. Clay's on vacation. I've watched a little basketball. I am familiar with some of the basketball that has been going on. And so you could, maybe you can go reverse Buck. You could pick the team that I don't pick. Whatever. I'll give you my pick. Remind me of this team, but use code buck. You'll get $50 instantly when you play $5. Get that prize Picks app. If nothing else, that will let you make your pick this week. And you can make fun of me if I'm wrong, or you can roll with me and be like, buck, you're a genius. If I'm right, you'll get $50 instantly when you play five. Download that prize Picks app and use code Buck.

[Mark Wayne Mullen]

Made in America means something to us when you invest 700 billion annually in American companies. And the Fed 13 million workers and families they support. You're investing in the success of Main Street. That's money powering growth in manufacturing, tech, energy and innovation. And it starts with private equity backing American ambition. Learn how private equity keeps American businesses [e-mail] paid for by the American Investment.

[J.R. Martinez]

Council the Medal of Honor is the highest military decoration in the United States. Recipients have done the improbable, the unexpected, showing immense bravery and sacrifice in the name of something much bigger than themselves.

[Joe Getty]

This medal is for the men who.

[Clay Travis]

Went down that day on Medal of Honor.

[J.R. Martinez]

Stories of Courage. You'll hear about these heroes and what their stories tell us about the nature of bravery. Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Buck Sexton]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand? We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and tedious and depressing and makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Clay Travis]

He's Joe Getty.

[Buck Sexton]

We're Armstrong and Getty. We try to bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy.

[Clay Travis]

Modern world about something about a comedic tone.

[Buck Sexton]

We have a winner.

[Clay Travis]

Yes.

[Buck Sexton]

Listen to Armstrong. You get it on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Leon Nayfak]

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency. It became known as the Iran Contra Affair.

[Joe Getty]

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane, I can't begin to tell you.

[Clay Travis]

Please.

[Leon Nayfak]

To hear the whole story. Listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Clay Travis]

This is an iHeart podcast.