
Loading summary
Buck Sexton
Ch Ch. Chumba looking for excitement? Chumba Casino is here. Play anytime. Play anywhere.
Clay Travis
Play on the train, play at the store.
Buck Sexton
Play at home. Play when you're bored.
Clay Travis
Play today for your chance to win.
Buck Sexton
And get daily bonuses when you log in. So what are you waiting for?
Clay Travis
Don't delay. Chumba Casino is free to play. Experience social gameplay like never before. Go to Chumba Casino right now to play hundreds of games, including online slots, bingo, Slingo and more. Live the chumba life@chumbacasino.com no purchase necessary.
Buck Sexton
VGW Group Void where prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions welcome everybody to the Tuesday edition of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Our man Clay on a much deserved vacation and college tour with his with his oldest boy. So he'll be back with us on Monday. He's taking the week to do the family stuff and enjoy himself. We hope him, Laura and the kids are having a great time. We have a lot of news to dive into today and things are heating up. I think you could say that the initial honeymoon period with the media, not that they wanted to give us one, but they were so shocked that they couldn't even figure out a way to oppose Trump effectively in public. That is starting to fade as they scream recession, recession and authoritarianism. So we shall discuss where all this is coming from. We got Congress right now wrangling over the continuing resolution. There's government shutdown talk. Oh boy. Up on Capitol Hill. We will discuss this. Trump announcing new tariffs on Canada. So he's going to impose 50% tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. We'll discuss this. This is a retaliatory tariff. There's a lot of back and forth over the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, an anti American, pro Hamas, pro Palestinian activist on a student visa. I think that's a discussion we should get into in a little bit. You've also got the aftermath of Dylan Mulvaney on the View. It turns out the ladies of the View are as disconnected from reality and cognitively limited as we had always assumed here on the show or we had always discussed. And we shall get into all of that and more. Also, take a bunch of your calls, 800-282-2882. And I'll just say this, my friends, it is important to note that this was all what we should have expected. When you try to change the system, when you take it upon yourself to challenge the way things are done in the biggest, most expensive government in the history of the world, which I think is fair to say no one else is spending the trillions that we have spent or we have gotten used to spending. No one else has ever gotten US$36 trillion or the equivalent. I don't know, maybe we could go back to ancient Rome or something, but nobody else has, has run this up the way that we have in the modern era. We've got some real problems to fix. Right? The initial flurry of executive orders from Trump was fantastic. It was, it was time for us all to high five, do backflips. And like I said, if you remember, you were listening to us at the time, I said, enjoy this, go out this weekend, crack a beer or a chardonnay or whatever it is you like to, you know, in my case, some stevia sweetened water. Go, go. Enjoy yourself. Enjoy the victory that Trump had over all the forces trying to stop him. Enjoy the victory the Republicans had in. Because things are going to get messy and we're entering the messy phase now. It's not going to be what they're telling you it is, which is that somehow this is all going to fall apart and the economy is so bad and it's all Trump's fault. That is to be expected from an anti Trump media that has lied to you about absolutely everything. I've seen that, even with the Heritage Foundation, I think it's the accountability Project. They have, they've looked at the signatures, the auto pen signatures of Biden on a bunch of his. Well, a bunch of things that he officially signed and some of them don't match up. And this under a normal president, under a cognitively functioning president, you might say, well, you know, people use auto pens. Did Biden even know all the things he was signing? And if he didn't know all the things he was signing, it's not really law, is it, if some adviser just effectively forged his signature. Right. It's one thing for a president to have an auto pen signature. Yes. My hand is tired. Auto. That has happened before. We know this. I'm not discounting that reality. But if a president isn't even aware of what is being signed in his name, is that a thing that we don't pay attention to? Does that not have consequences? I think it clearly should. But I bring it up because we have entered a new era now where we have a president who is very much engaged and advisers who are on a mission. This is not the business as usual presidency. This is not even the Trump as we got to know him presidency, as in Trump 1.0. This is clearly Trump 2.0. This is something elevated. And beyond the first go round, there was a lot of on the job learning. There were personnel decisions and mistakes. Let's just be honest about this. Trump is honest about it. He fired a bunch of people. He has had people turn against him who owe their careers to him. Now in the media, but then in government. So there was a learning curve and there was, I think from the Trump team also the surprise of having to deal with not just the media going all out against him, but we remember the Russia collusion hoax and the media Democrat intelligence community complex, the apparatus all going at Trump with everything that they had and it slowed things down. This time around, they have thrown everything at him and they have been shown incapable of stopping him from getting to his second term. A magnificent thing in incredible comeback. That's why I told you, enjoy it. Don't just look at the fight ahead. You know, when you win the big game before you go to the state championship, you still go out and celebrate. The election victory was huge. Now we get to fixing the country. And fixing the country isn't going to be something that just happens overnight or even in the first quarter or two of Trump's term. Remember, he hasn't even been in office two months and they're saying, oh, look at the price of eggs. Look at the stock market, look at noise. This is noise. And there's also an important perception management that has to go on here where if you're going to contract government and if we have become, for GDP purposes, reliant on government's expansion, as in too much spending. The. The government just creates, creates the perception of additional value. It's just numbers on a screen or it's paying bureaucrats who do nothing. I mentioned you yesterday, 25% of new jobs under Biden, government jobs. The government is putting out 25% of the new jobs that are being created over the course of an entire 2023, I think, and 2024 is close to it, if not the same. That's not making any of us better off. That is just expanding the scope and price tag of the government itself. To deal with that, though, it's a little bit like going on a diet, something I know about, because you're going to be hungry. And if we have to be hungry here, when it comes to government spending a little bit, this is the thing it's all about. It's all about proportion. It's all about balance. Trump is trying to restore balance. Elon Doge they're trying to restore sanity in the way that the government Spends in the way that the government takes your money in your name and puts it to use, in many cases, very bad use, in some cases, just effectively lighting money on fire to stop that process from happening. There's going to be fierce opposition, which we have already seen. Right. Especially when you start to touch these NGOs. I think it was Elon who said, and it's so right. How is it a non government organization if the government is entirely responsible for funding funding it? That's just a cutout. That's what we would call it in intelligence circles. Right. That's a carve out, it's a proxy. So something was very wrong with that whole situation and now many of us are far more aware of it than we ever had been in the past. So that's an important win. And now we're looking at the beginning of stopping the spending juggernaut from just rampaging forward toward $40 trillion of debt. It's not going to be easy and it is not going to be without a little bit of rumbling along the way. There's going to be some moments where things are going to look a little bit tougher than they might have been if we just continued spending, but we can't continue the spending. And this is why Trump has come out and said that he wants to put the country on a firmer economic footing. He wants to do what he can so that this isn't just about what the stock market looks like now. It's how far is your paycheck going in a year, in two years, in five years. This is about turning around a massive part of the economic engine here so that it is. And really redoing parts of it so that it can function more efficiently for everyone. Because we've seen what the inflation has done to your ability to pay your rent. We've seen if you, if you are asset light in this economy, meaning if you don't own a lot of stuff that is productive, stocks, real estate, things like that, if you don't know, then that all gets inflated along with the inflation. And so what it does is it squeezes those who are working for paychecks for a living, which is the vast majority of the American people, those who are doing work and trying to get ahead and just trying to pay their bills and do it the right way, they have a tougher time and it is effectively a tax on them to continue to spend at the levels we have currently seen. This has to be addressed, this has to be changed. And this is also why you will see Democrats are You'll notice there's no spending that they really want to cut. They like the control that this gives them. There's a tremendous amount of social engineering that is possible when you're spending so much money that nobody even knows what you're spending it on or who's getting is such a shield. It is such a shroud for corruption because if you don't, if no one really knows where the money's going, the numbers are so big and there's so many things, how can you ever get a handle on this? This is where Trump and Elon and Doge come in and the fight over the government shutdown. I have a tough time getting all that energized about this one way or the other. We've been through this before. It's a lot of brinksmanship and blame game stuff and eventually the government will be funded if, if they allow it to be defunded temporarily or the funding to run short. I believe Trump then is in a position to just decide what is considered essential and what keeps running. So there's that. But here is Speaker Johnson who is trying to wrangle all of this and he's saying that it's Democrats who are taking this to the point where there could be a shutdown. Play one.
Mike Johnson
They're planning to vote down this simple bill. They are going to try to shut the government down. Every House Democrat will participate in this. It looks like that would be a shame if it's true. I hope some of them will have a moment of clarity themselves and do the right thing. But it looks like they're going to try to shut down the government. It's a striking new posture for Democrats who have always said they've just been apoplectic about the prospect of government shutdowns. Democrats have been insisting they're fighting for federal workers. You're about to see again, on vivid display, very clear the contrast. You will see one team that is working to fund the government and make sure we do the responsible thing. And you're going to see another posing a CR because they've now exposed the truth. They're not for federal workers. They're not for anyone. All the people they've said in the past that are going to be harmed would be by their votes.
Buck Sexton
This is one of the challenges of opposing Democrats, is that they stand for whatever they need to stand for in the moment. They change their mind on everything. They change their principles as if they have any. They change what they believe in. It doesn't. It's about power and when you're talking about the government and how it spends money, there might be no more clear abuse of power that Democrats can engage in than what we, what we see, which is spanning us all into oblivion. Tackling this is a critical, a critical issue. I've said it from the very beginning. Our borders and the government, cutting it down to size, cutting the spending down, cutting the bureaucracy down. The two most important missions of the Trump administration. We've seen excellent work at the border so far. Thank you, Tom Holman and team. And credit to DHS Secretary Noem, credit to the people that are doing what is necessary to secure our border so that it's 95% down for illegal crossings. Interior enforcement is the harder problem. I will always be honest with you. That is even more challenging, and that will require more political will and more infrastructure. It's millions, it's tens of millions of people that you're talking about who are at least possible deportees. And then you have tackling the government beast. You see, the Democrats had created a system where they win no matter what, even when they lose elections, they win because the spending is automatic, because the bureaucracy is huge, because there's no accountability in D.C. and it's just one free for all. With your money, you go to work, you, you spend your life and your time trying to be productive and provide for your family. And the shenanigans in D.C. means that you're a hamster on a treadmill that keeps going faster and faster and faster, and how are you supposed to keep up? That's not good. And Trump recognizes that his team sees what's going on and they are taking steps to make this better. It's not going to be perfect. It's not going to be quick. It's not, and it's not going to be that easy. There's going to be a little bit of disruption. The markets may be in some tumult here for a few months. Of course, of course, when you're correcting a problem, there tends to be right and every, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. When you stop overspending, it's going to feel like things are a little lean sometimes. But for a vast majority of people, I truly believe, as vast majority of Americans, this is clearly the way it has to be done, and it has to be done now. By the midterms, we're back to business as usual. By the midterms, we're just arguing over how to move the deck chairs on our fiscal Titanic. It's not good. It's a Horrible feeling when you discover your personal information is in the hands of a cyber hacker. These criminals work silently and in the background to break into databases, including your confidential information. You usually don't find out about it till after the damage is done, leaving you with a mess to deal with. Closing accounts and canceling credit cards that have been compromised. Lots of places can accidentally expose your personal information, giving these cyber hackers a head start. That's why having lifelocks online Identity theft Protection Protection is a huge help. Lifelock detects and alerts you to potential identity threats you may not spot on your own like loans taken out on your name. If you do become a victim of identity theft, a dedicated US based restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Terms apply. It's easy to help protect yourself with LifeLock. Join now and save 40% off your first year with my name Buck as your promo code, call 1800-LIFELOCK. That's 1-800-LIFELOCK or go online to lifelock.com and use promo code BUCK for 40%.
Clay Travis and Buck Sexton
Off saving America one thought at a time. Clay, Travis and Buck Sexton. Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast.
Clay Travis
How to have fun anytime, anywhere. Step 1 Go to Chumbacasino.com Chumbacasino.com Got it. Step 2 Collect your welcome bonus.
Buck Sexton
Come to Papa. Welcome bonus.
Clay Travis
Step 3 Play hundreds of casino style games for free.
Buck Sexton
That's a lot of games all for free.
Clay Travis
Step 4 Unleash your excitement.
Buck Sexton
Woo hoo.
Clay Travis
Chumba Chumba Casino has been delivering thrills for over a decade. So claim your free welcome bonus now and live the chumba life. Visit chumbacasino.com no purchase necessary vgw group.
Buck Sexton
Void where prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions apply. Welcome back into Clay and Buck talk tariffs for a moment. For a moment. All right, strap in. It's going to get wild. We're going to talk a little tariff econ 101 history. Maybe we'll dive into the Smoot Hawley tariffs back in what, the 30s? This is, this is a moment where I think it's important to look at the basics because things are getting a little bit feisty on the terror front. Let me just give you the news on this and then we'll do a little bit of a deep, deep dive into the analysis. Donald Trump from Truth Social. I'm quoting now. Based on Ontario Canada placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the United States. I've instructed my Secretary of Commerce to add an additional 25% tariff to 50% tariff on all steel and aluminum coming into the United States from Canada, one of the highest tariffing nations anywhere in the world. Okay, so he says this will go into effect tomorrow morning, March 12th. He says Canada must drop their anti American farmer tariff of 250% on various US dairy products. I'll declare a national emergency on electricity within the threatened area. This will allow the US to do what needs to be done to alleviate this abusive threat from Canada. Ok, couple things here. First of all, as we've already established, because this is so important, I understand the economic consensus such as it exists among, among economists is that tariffs are almost like a. It's like a sales tax or it's just, it's a tax that consumers pay and it lessens aggregate demand. And so they just say that's bad. They just view tariffs bad. They want total free trade. That's the least theoretically the problem with this, and this is why I gave economists a little rough stuff yesterday. The problem with this is that there are a lot of tariffs and a lot of protectionist policies in place all over the world already, including with our neighbors Mexico and Canada. So we're not starting from a place of everything is level. Why are you making it not level with your tariff? This is where we get to reciprocal tariff. Right in the word reciprocal. They're doing this to us and so we do something in response. If my neighbor Clay hates leaf blowers, and by the way, he is spot on, leaf blowers drive me insane too. If my neighbor is using a leaf blower super loudly and they won't stop at, you know, 7:00 at night, 8:00 at night, because as we know, this is leaf blower should be a 9 to 5 thing. You shouldn't wake anybody up. You shouldn't keep anybody from going to sleep anyway, some of you are going to take issue with that, but you're wrong. If I then start playing loud music, if I start blasting Beethoven over the fence so that they get the hint, I'm not the noise polluter. I'm engaged in a reciprocal act of noise making so that they will stop. Although maybe they'll just love the Beethoven. This is a total digit. You know what, I'll come to this later. I actually experienced something in Nashville when it comes to classical music that I thought was fascinating. But I'll tell you about that in a moment. I don't want to, I don't, I don't want to weave too much. I don't want to Weave too much. Trump weaves. I weave without clay here. My weave can sometimes spin off into. So I'm going to get back onto tariffs. Reciprocal tariffs, meaning they are doing this to us. Why would a country, why would Canada have a 250% tariff on our dairy going across the border unless there were some benefit to them? Of course there is some benefit to your domestic producers and domestic industry. And so that's why other countries do this to us. Right? I mean, we're just, we're just looking at this logically put aside, you know, whether somebody is, I mean, Paul Krugman is an economist who got a Nobel prize. The guy's a moron. So, you know, it's not like we have to just sit there and say, oh, whatever you say economists now, you look at individual tariffs on individual, on an individual basis and you realize they are a tool. It is a tool. Just like for example, sanctions saying, now that's a more, that's more aggressive. But you know, sanctions are a tool. Sometimes good, sometimes bad. Tariffs, sometimes good, sometimes bad. It depends. It is case dependent. And this is what gets lost in so much of the discussion about this because people just say they have this, this automatic wave of the hand. Well, all the economists say, and I'm like, you know, what do all the economists really know? You know, you gotta ask that question. What have they, what have they gotten right about the economy recently? Not a whole lot. Uh, now there are obviously exceptions to this. We have some great economists and we've had Art Laffer on the show and Steve Bohr on the show and there are brilliant guys out there. But I, I mean the, it's like the same thing with the foreign policy consensus. If you listen to the D.C. based Foreign Policy consensus, there's not a war we shouldn't fight, there's not an invasion we shouldn't do. You know, America is the global police. And they've been very wrong and we've paid a heavy price for this with the so called economic consensus. We have been on the receiving end of tariffs and what you could say are trade war acts for a long time and we don't do anything in response. This is where Trump was right on the issue of China in his first term. And the DC Consensus was. So remember, I say DC Consensus because a lot of Republicans, it's not just Democrats opposed Trump, period. Democrats, you know, Trump says, hey, it's a nice day. And they're like, it's a terrible day. 75 degrees and breezy is terrible. They don't Care. But there are Republicans that go along with this as well. There are Republicans that decide, oh, I disagree with Trump on this issue and they were proven wrong in the first term on China, in my opinion, and I think in everyone's opinion, because even Biden kept a lot of the Trump China policies in place on trade. We want to get them to stop doing what they're doing. So we are then creating the threat of tariffs creates an even, a more even playing ground for our producers and our consumers. Why should we have less access to their market than they have to ours? Ah. And this is again, where it's a tool. Now we have the premier of Ontario, Doug Ford here talking tough about tariff fights with, with Trump. Play this one.
Doug Ford
Let me be clear. I will not hesitate to increase this charge if necessary. If the United States escalates, I will not hesitate to shut the electricity off completely. Believe me when I say I do not want to do this. I feel terrible for the American people because it's not the American people who started this trade war. It's one person who's responsible. That's President Trump. I'd rather be working together. I want to sell the US More energy, more electricity, more critical minerals. I want to make Canada in the United States the richest, most successful, safest.
Buck Sexton
Okay, yeah, we get it. We get it. Anyway, the point is he's throwing down with Trump now. They're saying they're going to make our electricity costs more specifically to Minnesota, Michigan and New York, which get electricity across the border from, from Canada. So they're going to drive up energy prices on us. Trump is saying, don't worry, we're going to handle this. Here's the way to handle it. We want also things that aren't necessarily purely economic as well, which is where more so with Mexico, but also with Canada. We want border cooperation. So see people. Again, tariffs are a tool. Ok. Will something be, will something be more expensive as a result of tariff, particularly over a relatively short period of time? Yes, but are there more important things than the cost of goods in that one sector for that period of time? This is a decision to be made. Right. What is more important that we keep, I don't know, the cost of, of textiles brought in from Mexico. I think those are even brought in mostly from, like, Southeast Asia now. But whatever the cost of avocados, that's what we always. Oh, my gosh, if we do anything with Mexico and trade, your, your avocado toast is going to be. And that's always a cheap shot they take at us Millennials and Gen Z with the avocado. Avocado toast is delicious, but they say your avocado is going to be so expensive. All right. If a 50% increase in the cost of avocados is something that we're willing to bear in order to get a 50% reduction in, I don't know, fentanyl seizures at the border, is that worth it? Again, it is a tool. It's something that Trump is using. Did Trump blow up the economy? And this is the other part of this I get to as well. Did Trump blow up the economy in the first administration when he was doing these different maneuvers on trade, when he negotiated the U.S. canada, Mexico agreement? What is the record of Trump on the economy? Phenomenally strong. Right? Who knows more than Trump, who has been in a position of leadership, who's been a president in recent memory? No one. No one is better on the economy than Trump. I would say as president in my lifetime, better than Bush, better than Obama, better obviously better than Biden. I mean, you can go back to Reagan, but there are some things that I would, I would quibble with when it comes to some of, well, really on immigration with Reagan, that's where we have a departure more so than on the economy. Nonetheless, I think that Trump has earned the leeway to pursue these paths without people freaking out. At least on our side, the Democrats are going to freak out no matter what. But on our side of things, it's going to be, it's going to be a little bit of time and there's going to be a little bit of disruption because to be a disruptor to the system requires some disruption. This is very straightforward. You're not going to fix this stuff without there being a little bit of, whoa, okay? And there's going to be kicking and screaming from bureaucrats and the deep state and the Democrats and the anti Trump media that's looking for anything to say that is negative for Trump. So when we talk about tariffs, I just think it's important to put it in the context of one, it's a negotiating tool. Some of these tariffs won't even go into effect. Two, they're reciprocal tariffs. They are in response to, in a lot of cases, tariffs that already exist with other countries. We're saying, hey, knock that off and we'll knock this off. What's wrong with that? I don't understand why, why should we say that other countries can punish our access to their markets and punish our producers, but we can't do the same. And then three, sometimes there are things that are more important than an increase in the cost in a certain industry at a certain time. This is really where I get into the agreement on Mexico with Mexico on border issues. That's a critical US national security and sovereignty interest. It's not just about the price of avocados. So with that in mind, I understand. We don't want things to get crazy. We don't want prices to skyrocket. The Trump administration is sensitive to it. But just remember, the same people who are criticizing this with the most fervor in the media and in a commentariat were the ones who were telling you that Joe Biden was sharp as attack. Why would you believe them now? Why, why do they have credibility now on this issue? So we give it some time, we let this play out. We let Trump do what he does, ok? He, he's got Elon Musk. You got people running around, Democrats. Elon Musk is dumb. Anybody who tells you Elon Musk is dumb shouldn't be listened to on anything. And I don't know how they can even tie their own shoes. They shouldn't be listened to on a single issue, period. Full stop. All right? We've got very smart people. I do not have concerns, especially on the economic and budget cutting side of this administration. You have an all star team that has been assembled. Look at the people who are criticizing it. They, I mean, when I say, look, it's okay to say I disagree with this tariff or that tariff, that's fine. I mean, the ones who are saying, recession, it's gonna be terrible. They're trying to induce fear in people to turn them against what Trump is trying to do. This is the moment where we have to sort of steal our spines and say, all right, let's go. We wanted this ride. We said, we said, Trump, I'm tall enough for the roller coaster. Let's get on the roller coaster. It's going to be fun, it's going to be great. But there are going to be some times where it's a little, whoa, we're going pretty fast. I'm just saying. Now look, a lot of people have go bags in the event of an emergency. What about having a stay bag to protect your home if the threat is at your doorstep? Our sponsor, Sabre, manufactures a whole array of self and home defense tools that you want to have in your home arsenal. Now, Sabre is spelled SA B R E. The website you go to to get their products is Sabre Radio. S A B R E radio I have in my look, I'll tell you Where I have, I've got my gun closet and I've got my saber portion of the gun closet. So I have nonlethal and lethal options depending on not only my comfort level but Carrie. Carrie's not a gun gal. Okay. I'm a gun guy. Carrie's not a gun gal. She likes having and feels better knowing that she has for when she leaves the house, non lethal options for when she's in the house, nonlethal options. And Sabre makes the best in class, especially the pepper projectile launcher, which I'm just going to tell you. Also training with this, you get comfortable with it. It's a lot of fun. Clay and I have done this. The pepper projectile launcher from Sabre is the best. It is the only 60 gauge launcher on the market. There are others that try to copy this. They're not as good. I've tried all of them. Sabers are the best in class when it comes to having a pepper launcher projectile because that pepper cloud can stop that threat very quickly. And you don't have to be super accurate because it creates a six foot pepper cloud spray. Sabre is a generational family business has safeguarded hundreds of thousands of Americans. The best pepper sprays, the best home defense tools go to Sabre. Radio.coms a b r e radio.com save 15% on that website today. Or if you want to call in, it's Easy to call 844-824-SAFE. That's 844-824-SA safe.
Clay Travis and Buck Sexton
Patriots radio hosts a couple of regular guys, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton. Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast.
Buck Sexton
A couple of things for the ombudsman here, which I guess I have to play the ombudsman for myself for today. My wife pointed out as she was listening on the way back in from being out and about that I said the three year. I meant the five year anniversary of the COVID lockdowns went into effect now and I won't spend much time on it because there's a lot to talk about now and that was five years ago. But it was insane and I am very proud that I opposed the lockdowns by the first week of. I mean openly opposed the whole thing. As soon as 2 weeks to slow. Or was it 10 days or 2 weeks is 2 weeks to slow the spread. I'm even forgetting now 10 days to slow the spread. Whatever it was, as soon as that was over I was like okay, let's go back to life. We gave, we gave the. We gave the hospital capacity. We gave them time to get ready and catch up and then they said no. And then we realized it was a bait and switch. And then we realized that we were getting a little trial run of authoritarianism and it was the health bureaucracy. It's like it had taken over the government. And certainly at the state level we saw just madness. And I'm very, very thankful to Donald Trump for allowing the state of Florida, remember, he did not come down hard and everyone wanted to, oh, the federal government. He allowed the state of Florida to be a laboratory of freedom during COVID and Governor DeSantis for being the best. Now, nobody was perfect. Everybody had a little period of a few weeks or so or a couple of months where they were allowing restrictions in their states. But some people figured out what was going on pretty quickly and others, like the Democrats, just kept getting crazier and crazier for years, crazier and crazier. So that I just wanted to know it. Yes, it's five years, not three years. And it is amazing. Now I really think of my life in my mind and I'm sure I'm not the only one. There are two events, historical events that are my, my sort of before and after for periods, right? It's like when did the, when did the medieval period turn into the Renaissance? Turn into, you know, those time markers and it's 9, 11 and COVID lockdowns. Those are just two things in my mind that there's, there's, there was the before and after world that I lived in and the before and after world that I lived in with COVID So those are two, two big things. The other Ombs Budsman note that I would point out is yes, I know that I need a haircut. For those of you who are watching on the video stream, no, I do not use a weed whacker. And I think that's very mean. So, yes, I'm getting a haircut. Probably, probably even tomorrow. I'll go see a couple of my, I got a couple of Cuban American friends here who do a great job nice and quick. They don't, they don't want to like get chatty with me. They just do a great job cutting the hair and they bring me the Cuban coffee in a little, just a little tiny bit of it. That stuff is, is, is, is good, almost Crockett level good, I'm telling you. All right, so yes, it is not in fact a, you know, I do not have a woolly mammoth on my head. All these things that people say untrue Untrue fake news. No woolly mammoth on Buck's head. So Elon Musk. Elon Musk here is. First of all, I wanted to note because I brought it up yesterday that X was down for a bit and that's troubling because X is now the first line social media platform for free speech. It is. I know, I know about Truth and Rumble. I'm on those platforms too. But X has broader reach. That's why it was a acquired for 40, $44 billion, whatever it is. And Elon said something that I just have to know that this is very interesting and I'm not a tech technical. Wow. Yeah. Clearly I'm not a technological expert, so I can't speak to how verified or verifiable this is. But this is Cut five. He said that the massive attacks, attack on X which shut it down various times throughout the day came from anyone a guess. Play five. There was a cyber attack on X today which shut it down and may have been foreign sourced. It's a big story. You want to give us a moment on that?
Elon Musk
Well, we don't, we're not sure exactly what happened, but there was a massive cyber attack to try to bring down the EX system with IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area.
Buck Sexton
IP addresses in Ukraine. Now maybe they were spoofed, mirrored. I know there's ways to fit, but I think Elon's a pretty sophisticated player when it comes to the Internet and technology. So if anyone's going to be able to get his team to figure out what really happened here, I think he's very high on the list. I don't know who would be much better at this. So if he, maybe he'll come out and say, oh, they, they mirrored it and it was actually from somewhere else. I don't know. He said it's not, he even said it's not definitive or all that clear. But it is interesting that that might have happened. I'm just going to note that that is a situation that we should pay some attention to. Somebody in Ukraine would be taking it upon themselves. It was sophisticated too. This is not something that I think would be easy for some individual to just pull off. What's, what's, wrong with people being able to share information freely about Ukraine and what's going on over there. Why would anyone want to stop that? I think that is very interesting. You had Senator Mark Kelly, who wanted to be, I think Vice President Mark Kelly, but probably made a smart decision not tying himself to the Kamala ticket. To be fair, this is Cut nine. He, Elon Musk called him, said that it's Mark Kelly went to Ukraine on his own to do one of these Ukraine tours. Elon didn't like it. I think he said that that's a betrayal or he's betrayed his country. He's a traitor for doing this. And here's what Mark Kelly said about Elon in response. Play nine about me. Well, not obviously he's not a serious guy. He's like a 12 year old. So I don't take him seriously. I served our country Navy for 25 years. When I was 22 years old, I swore an oath to defend the Constitution. I've lived that oath my entire life. I'm not sure if Elon has sworn an oath to anything. I was to guess, probably to billionaires like himself. Wow, really? We're gonna, we're gonna do that, huh? If you start off saying you don't take Elon Musk seriously, you shouldn't be taken seriously. What could be a dumber thing to say than the richest guy in the world who's creating more. I thought Elon was amazing. I read Elon's biography before he was red pilled on the Trump trainer. The guy's just done incredible stuff, incredible stuff that's changing the future and providing a lot of value to humanity in the process. He's. I don't. He's not, he's not a serious person. If, if Elon Musk is not a serious person, who is? Who is? You know, you have to have to wonder about, about this assessment of him. The work that Doge is doing is certainly serious and important. And here he is, Elon, speaking about that. This is Cut seven. He just wants everybody to know how essential Doge is. So essential to him. Here's a guy. Let me just take a step back before we play that Cut. Elon is, as part of his mission, specifically with SpaceX, he wants us to get to Mars because he wants humanity to be interplanetary in case something terrible happens here, asteroid hit, nuclear war, whatever. Right. I think he actually is a little worried about climate change. I hope he's moderated that because I'm not saying Elon's right about everything, but he wants us to be interplanetary so he thinks the survival of the human species over the long run requires us to be a multi planetary. I'm sorry, I said inter. I meant multi planetary. Multi planetary species. Now he is willing for free to take time away from that mission to help Donald Trump to try to fix the government in this country. I think that goes to how important he thinks it is. I also think anybody who tells you that Elon's only in this for his billionaire friends is a moron. That's just, that's absurd. He's the richest guy in the money. He's got more money than any other human being alive in the world. There's 7 billion people in the world. He's the richest one. And you think that this is all a game because he wants more money. Once you're worth a billion dollars, like how much money does, how much value does money even have? Additional money? It's a very steep decline. You know, your first hundred thousand dollars in the bank, I've been there, building it up. Makes a big difference. That first hundred grand, first ten grand. If you don't have it, man, you get that. I got a, I got a, you know, a couple of months or six months or whatever it is of security in the bank if I were to lose my job. That really helps, right? When you're worth $300 billion, being worth $350 billion doesn't get you out of bed in the morning, okay? Nobody cares. So these attacks about that are absurd. And anyway, here's what he says about Doge and how important it is. This is cut seven play.
Elon Musk
What motivates you to do this? Was the offer good? It's tough sledding. Yeah, it is tough sledding, but I think we're doing the right thing here. There have been many audits that have pointed out that there's tremendous amount of waste and fraud in the government. In fact, there was a report issued by, by the gao, the Government Accountability Office, last year. So during, during the Biden administration, which estimated the federal government fraud to be half a trillion dollars. So just because that's not a Trump administration thing, it's a Biden administration thing. So what we're trying to do is get that number down to a much smaller figure.
Buck Sexton
Half a trillion dollars of fraud. A Biden administration figure based on government audits and estimates of $500 billion. Why wouldn't, why would any person not want him to end that? Well, now you get into the ugly truth about the Democrat Party, which is that a lot of stuff that does not have support on its own is funded by the government. A lot of ideologically toxic left wing stuff relies on government funding, a lot of uniparty activity. And we're in charge even when we lose elections. Relies on the massive federal bureaucracy, relies on the bureaucracy's ability to give a lot of money to people that nobody even knows about. We need this transparency and everyone should want it and that Democrats don't and that they hate Elon. You got lunatic Democrats who are like lighting Tesla's on fire now as some kind of anti Elon protest. You're not going to bank bankrupt Elon by throwing a Molotov cocktail in a cyber truck in Oregon or whatever. You're just being an idiot. Right? Which not, not a surprise. But why do they hate him so much? Because he's a threat to the ideological system of the left. Because the ideological system of the left, the apparatus as I have called it for a long time, needs the fraud and needs to avoid and evade accountability of the American people. That's why they get so upset about this. That's why there's such, there's such rage about Elon specifically. There is no good faith reason to be angry about what Elon is trying to accomplish. And all Democrats do is complain about it. All they do is try to stand in his way. It tells you everything you need to know. Tomorrow, join me online for a special videotaped interview. It starts at 11am Eastern, just an hour before the show. It's a conversation with my dad you won't want to miss. I grew up in New York City, as you know, in a stockbroker family. My dad was a stockbroker and made his name by making incredible calls in advance about where the market's going. Most notably, he became famous back in 87 when he called the crash in advance on TV. He nailed it. He also called the crash in 2009 for his private clients. It's an incredible track record. The predictions are too numerous to get into all here. But the big one, the latest one, comes tomorrow, March 12th. Register online to check this out. It's an hour before this radio show starts to sign up for the event. It's free. Go to this website disruption2025.com that's disruption2025.com paid for by Paradigm Press.
Clay Travis and Buck Sexton
Making America great again isn't just one man, it's many. The Team 47 podcast, Sundays at noon Eastern in the Clay and Buck podcast feed. Find it on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Buck Sexton
All right, welcome back into Clay and Buck. I was mentioning before this story about Mahmoud Khalil. This is getting a lot of attention right now. New York Times and others all in up in arms about this. So let's, let's look at what this story is. You all you will remember and we talked about it here on the show. There were some just outrageous anti Semitic protests. And protest doesn't really cover it because some of it was threats, trespassing, destruction of property. There were crimes that were committed. Now, I'm not saying these are all serious felonies or, you know, there's some, but there were, there were crimes that were committed on campus. And Trump has said that they can either clean up their act or they're going to lose. I think they're set to lose hundreds of millions of dollars at Columbia in federal grants. Why are private institutions like Columbia getting hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money? Very good question. Something to be looked at. We're going to look at that. But this case is interesting to me. There's a lot of back and forth. The speaker of the House, just so you know, it's already gone up to that level. Speaker of the House Johnson took time from the ongoing wrangling of members of Congress or the continuing resolution to address this. And he said this is cut 18. Here's Speaker Mike Johnson. Play it.
Mike Johnson
If you're on a student visa, I'm gonna say this clearly. If you were on a student visa and you're in America and you're an aspiring young terrorist who wants to prey upon your Jewish classmates, you're going home. We're gonna arrest your tail and we're gonna send you home where you belong. And that this is just getting started. Started. So look, I appreciate free speech. I used to defend it in courts. But this is far beyond the pale of that. When you are threatening your classmates and spewing anti Semitism and all this hatred, it's enough. And I think the American people understand that. They're supporting it. And I'm glad we have a president who's strong enough to lay down the law.
Buck Sexton
So I've got a lot of thoughts about this and I do want to hear from some of you. Although we're going to be coming to the close of the show here pretty soon, so maybe get your talk backs ready, your emails ready because they won't have that much time for calls. Here's, here's what I see on this. This guy was part of these Colombia protests. Mahmoud Khalil. We'll just call him Khalil from here on out. In Arabic class, my Arabic name was Khaled, for those who want to know. Back in the day. It's been a while. I could still write it, I guess, if I had to. So, yeah. Anyway, so this guy Khalil, he was arrested at his home by ICE agents and is facing deportation. He's a big pro Palestinian guy. Now, this is where it all gets kind of. This is where a lot of the fighting happens, right? Because they say, well, you're allowed to be pro Palestinian. Ok, yeah, you're allowed to be pro Palestinian. Sure. I'm talking about first amendment stuff. But are you pro Palestinian or you're pro Hamas? Hamas is a terrorist entity. If you are selling T shirts to raise money for Hamas, it's a designated terrorist. And I'm not saying he did this. I'm just working through some of the, the, you know, the intricacies here of this, of this case. If you're selling T shirts or mugs, you know, if you're selling a mug, I heart Hamas. First of all, you're a lunatic. Second of all, and you're trying to send that money to Hamas, that's material support to a terrorist organization. I think you can get 10 years federal for that. Right? So that's clearly a violation of the law. And that's for anybody. You're here as an American green card. Hold it. Doesn't matter any. You can't do that. You're on. You're in U.S. jurisdiction of any kind, and you're doing material support for terrorist organization. Now, can you speak in favor of a terrorist organization under the First Amendment? Clearly you can. So you can say, you know, I, you can say that I agreed with, you know, the plans of Abu Bakr al Baghdadi to create a caliphate or something. You know, you can say that, but you can't take any steps to advance or assist or help. Because then again, we get back to material support. You can't be a, a US Spokesman for that group, then you're definitely going to Gitmo or something. So there are places where this crosses over very quickly. Here is what we know about this guy Khalil. He was at Columbia. He was a prominent, a face of these, again, they call them protests. It was really. There were Jewish students who were, you know, hounded and harassed on campus. I hate all of that. Like, I, you know, how I feel about Israel's fight against Hamas. Could not be more in favor of Israel doing what it needs to defend itself. You know how I feel about anti Semitism, and it has no place anywhere. And here, here's the only place where I have a little bit of a question about this. On the one hand, I feel very strongly that if you're, if you're a guest here, you've got to be on, meaning if you're not, you know, if you're somebody who's visited, and this even includes people who have a green card, you're not yet a citizen. If you break the law, you gotta go. You gotta go right? That I am. And that has not been the case, as we've seen, with a lot of. There's so, so much of a lack of enforcement on this. But if you break the law, you got to go. And it doesn't have to be like a rape or a murder. It's just if you break the law and you are charged with a crime, you got to go. The issue that I see here is this guy I don't believe has been charged with any crime. I don't believe he's been charged with any crime. He. His behavior, from what I can gather from everything, is. Is abhorrent. I disagree with him on everything. I think he's a scumbag. He's a guest in this country. Yes. So he has that elevated. That elevated expectation of, you know, you don't get to just do whatever. Like, you don't get. And now in the actual laws that pertain to this, with. When it comes to immigration, there are, you know, there. There are things that specifically cite a desire to overthrow the United States by force. So if you're. Even so, there are ideological places where you, you know, first of all, if you come to this country and you're. Let's say you're from communist China and you are visiting on a student visa and you start saying out in public, I think that there should be a violent revolution to overthrow the United States government, I'm out. We can. We can kick your butt out of here. That is in the law. There's no. No doubt about that. Right? That is. That is statute. I actually was reading the statute before I came on this morning to make sure a lot of immigration statutes are ignored, as we know, and that should not be the case because they are existing law. Just like all the other laws. With this guy, where I think it gets interesting is, has he. If he's going to be sent home as a. As somebody who's here on a student visa as a green card holder, I've heard both. By the way, guys, can we check on that? Is he a green card holder or is he here on a student visa? Or is it. Is it one, then the other? Is it both? Got to check his status. You should be on your best behavior here. You do not have the full rights of a citizen here. Obviously you can't vote. There's a whole bunch of things. If you're a guest here, you, you should just be thankful and total obedience to the law. If he broke the law and that's why we're sending him home, well, there should, there should at least be a charge filed, right, that somebody should charge him with. And there's a bunch that I think would apply here. Harassment, you know, intimidation, menacing, I believe is a statute in the penal code in New York City, if memory serves. When I was in the nypd, briefly in the nypd, and I was kind of like a hired nerd for the nypd, I wasn't doing the like real cop stuff, but I think menacing would be in there, you know, assault and battery, destruction of property, any of that. But to say that he's done it and therefore we're kicking him out without him being charged with any of that, that I know he's a scumbag. I don't like this guy or what he stands for either. But we, there, there is due, like there is due process. We still do need due process. So has he gotten that due process yet? That, that is a question that I have about this. A judge has already blocked, now it's, I'm sure a left wing judge, his removal from the US Pending an action on habeas, as in why is this guy in custody? This is going to get interesting. Because if he's in custody for not, you know, for saying bad things, okay, well that's not really a crime. If he's in custody for breaking laws, let's bring that charge and then let's go and let's find him guilty and then let's send his home. Very straightforward. Again, I'm all for you have to behave and you have to obey the law in this country if, especially if you're a visitor or else you go home. No, no if, ands or buts. But if we're saying that he was trying to call for the violent. I think he wanted to call for. By the way, I'm raising questions here. I haven't been able to look at everything this guy's ever said and there's, I think he said he wants to. The downfall of Western civilization. Right? And that's where we get to. Can you look at the downfall of Western civilization as the equivalent in statute of a violent overthrow of the United States government? You know, it's, it's getting pretty close. This is, this is where the judgment starts to come in again. Anybody who wants the violent overthrow of, or the overthrow rather of Western civilization, I'm opposed to with Every fiber of my being. It would be a disaster not just for those of us who live in Western civilization, but for the rest of the world, because we kind of prop up civilization for everybody else to. Just saying. So I want to see what, what exactly it was that. And this is going to come out in the habeas. Habeas corpus petition, right? This is what they're fighting over. Okay, well, why is this guy in custody? And I keep hearing all of these different things and now I'm just going to. I'm going to say this. Is this applicable in this case, specifically applying to issues of anti Semitism and anti Jewish speech on campus? Is it going to be applied to other speech on campus that is particularly problematic? And who is going to determine what that problematic speech may be? I bring it up because. Let's just fast forward. Forget about where we are now. Our team, the good guys are in charge. And I know it's like we trust them, right? For the most part, we. You go to a. If I say AOC administration, you'll all just start laughing. So you won't even follow the analogy. But you go to a Gavin Newsom, you're probably still laughing. A Gavin Newsom administration and somebody on campus wants to say or is saying things that are highly, highly offensive to Democrats. Are they going to be able to. And they're visiting, right? They're not an American citizen. They do not have full citizenship rights. Are Democrats going to be able to say, you're calling for the extermination of trans people. You're calling for violence against trans people? I know you're going to tell me, oh, no, come on. These people think that a man can become a woman. You don't think they're going to make this argument at some point if we start to open this up again? There has to be. I just want to know what the clear process is here. Mahmoud Khalil stands for everything, stands against everything that I stand for on the issues that concerns him or on the reasons. And his anti Semitism is vile and the guy shouldn't be in this country. But I just want. And this is where the habeas petition comes in. We need clarity on, well, what is the reason that he's being removed? Because if, if the executive branch can point to someone and say, well, you're a visitor here and I just don't like what you're saying. Even if in this case it's fully warranted and we totally agree with it, there's a precedent that they can just tell people oh, no, you're not allowed to come here and say that. You're not allowed to come here as a, as a refugee from, say as a white refugee from South Africa, which is another thing that Trump has been talking about and talk about the state racism in South Africa against white South Africa. No, no, no, not allowed. That's creating, you know, racial disharmony in this country. And it's. So you have to, you have to go home again in the Gavin Newsom administration. You see what I'm saying? I want clarity on this. I don't, I'm not opposed to it, but I want some of these answers because we need to be clear about what the standard is. And the standard can't just be a one off standard on this issue as, as awful as the anti Semitism stuff on campus was. Because if it is just speech we really don't like on campus. Remember I wrote my college thesis on speech codes on campus. Right. So this is going back for me a long time. I was thinking about this issue over 20 years ago and researching it and looking at all the different speech codes of a whole range of different schools. If it's just going to be, you say things that are really heinous and bad and then they claim that somehow that's inciting violence and then that's a violation of your, your student visa, the other side is going to be in power at some point and I can assure you they will abuse this, which is why the process matters. So I have a little bit of a different take on this. I think that some other people on the right right now, in so much as I want more, I just want, I want more issues, more answers rather, and more clarity on this one. But yes, if you break the law and your visitor gone, if you violate statute, your visitor gone, that, that is absolutely. But you got to do one of those. Show me the violation of the statute, show me where the law is broken and show me where the charge has been leveled. It can't just be someone determines it because they say so. Right. I would think, unless I guess maybe an immigration judge can just unilaterally decide based on this is where you have to get very specific. In the immigration statute that may be the case. Executive branch may have full authority to tell this guy that, you know, you go packing. And I'm not opposed to that at all. I'm for that. I just want to know what is he being sent packing for? Because saying stupid, heinous things. I need more spec, I need more specificity than that. If it's overthrowing Western civilization is tantamount to overthrowing the United States government. Well, let's have this will come out in the habeas petition, by the way. So we will return to this issue, but I wanted to be, you know, intellectually honest with you as I work through this one and just see what's really, what's really at issue, what's really going on here. Because I know right now it's like, oh, our team is in charge. And it's the pendulum will swing, my friends. Keep that in mind. The Preborn Network of Clinics is an incredible nonprofit that is dedicated to saving the lives of unborn children. Their success over the last couple of decades is staggering. Preborn opens and operates clinics in communities nationwide where abortion rates are the highest per capita. They do that specifically so they can interact with pregnant women deciding between life or abortion for their unborn child. Their ability to see life prevail is proven time and again. 300,000 plus babies have been born and brought into this world that otherwise would not have been. They do this by introducing women mothers to be rather to their baby via ultrasound. The ultrasound is free. The visit is free only because of you though, the pro life community. So would you please consider being a voice for preborn babies? Become a monthly donor. $28 a month could be the difference between life and death for so many. To donate securely, dial pound250 and say the keyword baby. That's pound250, say baby or visit preborn.com buck that's preborn.com buck Sponsored by Preborn.
Clay Travis and Buck Sexton
Keep up with the biggest political comeback in world history. On the Team 47 podcast. Clay and Buck highlight Trump replays from the week Sundays at noon Eastern. Find it on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Clay Travis
Your stomach is a mess and you feel lousy. Something is just off, but you don't know what. Yeah, we get it.
Buck Sexton
You.
Clay Travis
You've tried every fad, diet and supplement under the sun and none of it worked. Here's the truth. Your gut's a mess and your body is letting you know you're just too busy and you ignore the signs, making it worse. Viome gets straight to the point. Analyzing your gut microbiome to give you a personalized health plan that actually works. Your gut is how your body processes everything that you consume. Stop ignoring the signs. It's time to do something real. Get Viome and fix your gut. Now. Dial Star Star gut to get $110 off any test that's StarStar488 to receive a link to the offer.
Summary of "Daily Review with Clay and Buck – March 11, 2025"
In the March 11, 2025 episode of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, hosts Clay Travis and Buck Sexton delve into a spectrum of pressing issues spanning U.S. politics, international trade, and campus controversies. Despite Clay being on a well-deserved vacation, Buck steers the conversation through heated debates surrounding Donald Trump's recent policy moves, congressional gridlock, media dynamics, and significant legal cases impacting national discourse.
Buck Sexton opens the discussion by highlighting the shifting media narrative surrounding Donald Trump. Initially, the media was seemingly unable to effectively counter Trump's influence, granting him an inadvertent "honeymoon period." However, this leniency is dissipating as the media resorts to alarmist themes such as recession and authoritarianism to critique Trump.
Buck Sexton [00:27]: "The initial honeymoon period with the media...is starting to fade as they scream recession, recession and authoritarianism."
Clay adds that while Trump's initial flurry of executive actions was met with enthusiasm, the ensuing period will be fraught with challenges as the media intensifies its opposition.
The hosts address the ongoing tug-of-war in Congress over the continuing resolution for government funding, casting a spotlight on the looming threat of a government shutdown. Buck questions the motives behind Democratic resistance, suggesting intentional obstruction to push specific agendas.
Mike Johnson [12:23]: "They are going to try to shut down the government...they are not for federal workers."
Buck criticizes the Democratic Party's inconsistency, stating, "They change their principles as if they have any," emphasizing the power-centric approach rather than steadfast ideological commitments.
A significant portion of the episode focuses on President Trump's announcement of new tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, a retaliatory measure against Canada's hefty tariffs on American dairy products. The hosts analyze the strategic use of tariffs as negotiation tools rather than mere economic penalties.
Doug Ford [24:15]: "I will not hesitate to increase this charge if necessary...I want to sell the US more energy, more electricity, more critical minerals."
Buck reinforces this viewpoint by comparing tariffs to reciprocal actions, arguing their necessity in leveling the playing field for American producers and consumers.
Buck Sexton [24:15]: "Tariffs are a tool. Sometimes good, sometimes bad. It depends."
They discuss the potential economic impacts, noting that while tariffs may temporarily increase costs in certain sectors, they serve broader national interests such as border security and protecting domestic industries.
The episode scrutinizes the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestinian activist on a student visa, raising questions about free speech versus national security. Buck debates the legal and ethical dimensions of his detention, emphasizing the need for due process and clear legal justifications.
Mike Johnson [47:51]: "If you're on a student visa and you're an aspiring young terrorist...you're gonna go home."
Buck expresses concerns about the lack of transparency in the charges brought against Khalil, questioning whether his actions constitute material support for a terrorist organization or mere expression of political opinions.
Buck Sexton [48:27]: "Can you look at the downfall of Western civilization as the equivalent in statute of a violent overthrow of the United States government?"
The hosts briefly touch upon the controversial appearance of Dylan Mulvaney on The View, criticizing the show's hosts for being "disconnected from reality and cognitively limited." This segment underscores ongoing cultural battles and the media's role in shaping public perception.
Buck Sexton [00:27]: "It turns out the ladies of the View are as disconnected from reality and cognitively limited as we had always assumed here on the show."
Clay and Buck also explore broader policy issues, including the imperative to curb government spending and enhance border security. They commend the Trump administration's efforts in reducing illegal crossings and advocate for continued fiscal responsibility to prevent the national debt from spiraling.
Buck Sexton [13:07]: "This has to be done now. By the midterms, we're back to business as usual."
As the episode concludes, Buck Sexton emphasizes the importance of maintaining momentum in policy reforms despite anticipated disruptions. The hosts urge listeners to remain vigilant and supportive of initiatives aimed at economic stabilization and governmental accountability.
Buck Sexton [63:09]: "Keep that in mind. The pendulum will swing, my friends."
Buck Sexton [00:27]: "The initial honeymoon period with the media...is starting to fade as they scream recession, recession and authoritarianism."
Mike Johnson [12:23]: "They are going to try to shut down the government...they are not for federal workers."
Doug Ford [24:15]: "I will not hesitate to increase this charge if necessary...I want to sell the US more energy, more electricity, more critical minerals."
Buck Sexton [24:15]: "Tariffs are a tool. Sometimes good, sometimes bad. It depends."
Mike Johnson [47:51]: "If you're on a student visa and you're an aspiring young terrorist...you're gonna go home."
Buck Sexton [48:27]: "Can you look at the downfall of Western civilization as the equivalent in statute of a violent overthrow of the United States government?"
Buck Sexton [13:07]: "This has to be done now. By the midterms, we're back to business as usual."
Buck Sexton [63:09]: "Keep that in mind. The pendulum will swing, my friends."
This comprehensive review encapsulates the episode's key discussions, presenting a clear and engaging overview for those who did not listen to the full broadcast.