
Loading summary
A
This is an iHeart podcast, Guaranteed Human. The infinite presence of corruption is the guiding principle behind the great circle jerk of power today on the David Rutherford show. What's up, team? Instructor Rut here. Just want to thank you for joining us. You know, over the last several years, the one thing that I think is undeniable across the board, whether you're a Republican, a libertarian, a Democrat, you're Atheist, Catholic, Muslim, Jew, Christian or whatever, is that there has been a profound amount of corruption being exposed across the board. And this is it. Not only in America, but all overseas. Mean, we just did a show on the corruption of the European Union influencing along with NAD and, and USAID Influen influencing the elections of Romania, basically stealing the president, the presidency from Kiriscu or Georgia Skew. Excuse me. And what's beginning to happen, I think, is people now on both sides, especially if you watch anything Sean's been putting out lately, there's a real disdain, there's a, there's a sense of betrayal that I think is. Is really existing within the undergird of society. Now, granted, if, if you don't live on X or on any of the other social TikTok, the, any other social media and you don't pay attention to all of this, then you probably are like, what's the big deal? There's. It's always been this way, whatever, and you know, you're just going along your daily routines. But I think those of us that are paying attention to the sheer magnitude of what, of what is corrupt and what has been corrupt over long periods of time is getting us to a point where I don't know if it's hopelessness, but there's certainly a very pessimistic outlook of what's going to take place. And, and you know, I think most people would, would come to the realization that, hey, this is just the way people are, this is the way people have always been, and this is the way things will always be. There's just a certain group of people that are willing to compromise whatever moral framework they have in order to get ahead or, or to pad what they already have or just to beat another person in something, whatever that is, beat your political appointment, beat your financial enemy, beat your physical enemies of foreign countries, whatever it might be. There's just a natural proclivity within the human condition for us to institute a certain moral relativism in how we approach life. The challenge is, I think for most, you know, most folks is that they feel kind of not in. They feel like there's Nothing they can do, right? That they're powerless in this whole system. And I think when that begins to push through all levels of society, all levels of socioeconomic backgrounds, all level, I, I, you know, I think most folks that are on the lower end of the socioeconomic hierarchy, they feel like the whole system's corrupt from day one. They're taught it, they see it, they sense it, they feel it. You know, even people that rise up and then get busted by manipulating the system and go to jail, they still feel like, well, the system's corrupt anyways. I might as well get mine, right? Or politicians, they have a, a good heart when they come in, I'm going to go make a change. I'm going to be the difference. They get into office and some lobbyist firm or company or country comes up to him and says, hey, you know, we'll make sure that you win the next 10 campaigns and are in Congress for 40 years and intensify your net worth by 8,000% in a short period of time. As long as you vote on this and do this and do this. And that's just for most people, that's too hard to turn down. Right. Even people that are good people, you know, you know, for most of their lives, they get that temptation and they bite on it because why? Because, well, that guy's doing it and she's doing it. Why shouldn't I do it? Get mine while I'm here. Well, the problem is, is when those, when that reality becomes to overwhelm the consciousness of the society, the society itself, on the fringes or on the different rings, levels of that hierarchical structure begin to recognize, you know, first and foremost, we're fighting each other. We're at each other's throats. Well, you did it. No, you did it. You're the problem. I'm the problem. You're woke. You're conservative, and, and, and we're battling each other. You're Christian, I'm Muslim. Right. Back and forth and back and forth, pointing the blame. Well, ultimately, I think what ends up happening is there's an inevitable discovery that those who are a part of that top, you know, that top stratosphere are ended up really working in cohesion against everybody beneath them to maintain what they have and to maintain their power, their status, their financial wealth. And that's kind of the way it is. We've certainly seen that throughout history. Right. We've got some very definitive examples how those in power seem to feed the things that create the destabilization of those beneath, which keeps them in power through the financial reward or through the corporate reward or through the physical reward of, of, of owning the people with the guns, the bows, the arrows, whatever the people that can enforce their will for them. You know, we've got, obviously you go back throughout time in history and we've got a, a huge example. Let's go back to the Federal Reserve, right. Who crafted the documents for the Federal Reserve. It was the banking people, right. They decided after you what, the 1907 banking crisis. We need to shore this up. We can't have this again. There's too much uncertainty within this capitalistic structure. All right, well, let's just, let's create a, a central bank, you know, with Aldrich and Warburg and the lot at Jekyll island in 1910. Right. And then what did that do? That, that instituted a system where it just controlled interest and controlled debt and controlled fiat currency and the whole thing and has ultimately devalued the dollar and put us in a place where we're closing in on 40 trillion in debt, all to do what? To service the people that are in the banking system. We've seen it with the CIA and. Right, them banana republics. Well, because there was, you know, what was now Chiquita used to be what is National Fruit Company or something like that. Right. They, they worked with the Central Intelligence Agency to overthrow the government that wasn't supportive of them in order to make sure they got cheaper bananas. Right. And we've seen that extensively within the oil industry. Right. How many nations have been overthrown, Right. I. E. Iran, which seems like it's on the precipice of being overthrown again here because. Right. The Iranian government in 53 decided to nationalize oil production. So we got rid of him and installed our own puppet ruler of the place. And that wasn't the only place we've seen this happen. In fact, we just saw it happen in Venezuela. And we didn't even have to be covert about it. Right. It was like, nope, we need our hemisphere dominance. Oil production in Venezuela is the second or biggest and we're behind them. So we're just going to go take out them and restructure the deal with oil there. The same thing. And guess who was around the, the round table when they figured all this out? All the top oil executives just asked Tucker Carlson. He was in the room for the meeting. Right. So, right. We have, we have the banking industry, we have the oil industry, we have bananas and commodities industry. We certainly have the drug trade. Right. We've seen us influence the drug in Vietnam, right in the Golden Triangle. We've seen it in Afghanistan and, and protecting and effectively helping the distribution of raw opium across Uzbekistan. Right? So this, the history of this, this circle jerk is, is prominent and everybody can do the research and it doesn't matter what political party you on. If you see corruption, corruptions, corruption, both sides do it. Now this is kind of what I was going back to recently with the overwhelming statuses just once. And so let me just go start just to lay out the, the, the, the level with which it's happened to give you a spectrum in space. And I'm going to get to, at the end, I'm going to get to what we can do and how we can potentially fix this. So just bear with me because I want you to understand the totality of what's taking place in real time right now. The great state of Florida decided to initiate Doge and in the, in the state and over a quick six month or eight they were able to find corruption and fraud. All right, I'm going to go through them. Jacksonville 199 million. Hillsboro County 278 million. Broward County 189 million. Manatee County 112 million. City of St. Pete 49 million. Palm Beach County $344 million in fraud in Palm Beach County. All right, Miami Dade 302 Aalucha 84M City of Mining 94 million. Orange County 190. Seminole 48. City of Orlando 22 million. Nassau County 53 million. So that's pretty much every major county, every major city, every major place in Florida is corrupt or have having fraud and fraud by nature is corrupt. Right. Okay, now let's go to other states. We saw Maine, right. Sean had a, a guy, a reporter on Maine and the one that really blew mine. Aside from the Somali fraud, the immigration fraud that was taking place, but it was also the fraud that was place with. There was a big shooting in Lewiston where about 19 people were, were killed by this crazy, you know, this crazy former vet who shot up the place. Right. Well, that they raised millions of dollars, tens of millions of dollars. Well, guess what? A ton of that money was redirected towards immigrants and given not only given not to the families or the survivors of that whole, that shooting, but to illegally placed immigrants in the state of Maine. All right, we saw obviously the Somali fraud exposed by Nick Shirley to the tune of 8 billion. I just saw a report today on X that it can supposedly allegedly conf confirms that Tim Waltz had very had elect had nominated Put had people in place running that program that willfully did not check backgrounds, did not check applications, and just let all this stuff go through. So they were implicit in their ability of allowing the fraud to take place. That goes all the way up to the governor. Right. And we talked about this before. So you, you let these people come in, have these home learning care, health care, hospice care, wherever it is. Dr. Oz and the other dude were out in, in California. They discovered what, a $400 million fraud scheme at this old factory which was for Hospice Healthcare. 1800 Hospice Health care places. Right? It's, it's, it' everywhere. Every city. Don't even get started about the train to nowhere in California or the homeless debacle of billions of dollars, billions in dollars of being exposed. Right. Minnesota corruption. All right, how about just recently, we did a show, we had Garland Favorito on, and we discovered basically the FBI came in and took out 700. Or now they're saying 650 boxes and 50 are missing. But we've heard now through some releases of documents and other, that actually Senator Perdue was in the office with Governor Kemp. And it was brought up to them that there's probable fraud in many of these counties, most especially Fulton county and Purdue comes out and says, well, I'm a team player, so I'm going to go with whatever the, the governor in Rasberger says right? Now. These are Republicans. These are Republicans that essentially were like, yeah, we're, we're not going to investigate any of this. In fact, we're going to flip it around and we're going to work with the Biden Justice Department and Fannie Willis, and we're going to help facilitate a RICO case against President Trump and 18 of his associates, to which they were all, you know, looking at, you know, many, many years behind bars. So there you have that. All right, now, you know, we can go on and on and on. I think, you know, the biggest ones that we still have yet, and I think they're going to pop. I'm hoping, I'm hoping o' Keefe does a follow up on this. But that was the Act Blue fiasco. Right? And he went out and discovered, especially in Virginia counties around D.C. he would go to these old people's homes who were listed as ActBlue contributors. Knock on the door. How you doing? I'm an investigative journalist. It says here that you donated over $150,000 to Act Blue over the last three years and something like 1500 deposits. And the whole person's. I'm on a Fixed income? That's impossible. I've donated. I donate like once a year at five bucks. So where's all that money coming from and where is it going? We do know a ton of that money was raised during the BLM riots, which then went into the BLM leaders coffers. And they bought extra houses, extra portfolios, cars, the whole thing. And really didn't see any of these inner city areas that were benefited from that whole fiasco whatsoever. And you can even back up what was going on before that. The COVID stuff. Reggie, I just sold my car online. Let's go, Grandpa. Wait, you did? Yep, on Carvana. Just put in the license plate, answered a few questions, got an offer in minutes. Easier than setting up that new digital picture frame. You don't say. Yeah, they're even picking it up tomorrow. Talk about fast. Wow. Way to go. So, about that picture frame. Ah, forget about it. Until Carvana makes one, I'm not interested. Car selling made easy on Carvana. Pickup fees may apply. DARPA creates an opportunity for testing gain of function research with corona bat viruses. Funded by DARPA, funded by USAID, funded by the NIH. In 2014. They make it illegal. They offshore it. And somehow, miraculously, EcoHealth alliance, which has received tens of millions of dollars from all of these organizations, usaid, you know, military organizations, research organizations, nih. It mysteriously winds up in a Chinese military bio lab that's, you know, strangely releases essentially a month or gets out. And they originally said it was in a wet lab and it was some, you know, crazy exotic animal and all this stuff, when all we now know that's completely fabricated, that Foushee and his team fabricated. We've got the emails of them saying, this is how you escape your FOIA requests of your emails. Make sure you delete this. They change the. All these doctors, flip them to go on their side, and then. And then what'd you have. You have a worldwide cover up. Mind you, in October 19th, there was event 201 that was sponsored by Bill Gates, right, that had. At this meeting over in Europe, it had the deputy director of the CIA, had people from other government agencies, news sources, other World Health Alliance, United nations, politicians, business people. Part of this. What do we do if. If a pandemic hits, right? And a big part of that, and you can watch the video of this exercise was the. The censorship of disinformation and misinformation, which we now know they were working in conjunction with Stanford cisa, right? The censorship industrial complex that Mike Benz always talks about. The Aspen Institute, all these foundations and places that were known for being the credible, credible, you know, you know, trust the scientist or follow the science or, or, or you know, trust the exper. Mentality. And we all know that what, what was the end up happening of this was this massive shift the way we ran elections. Which comes down to what, what was the turnout in the elections of 2020? Right. You see the mail in Valley balloting and, and you know, the year before, what was it, the 16 election, there was 30 some million male, 35 million mail in balloting. Guess how many mail in ballots came in for the 2020 election? 70 million. And then it goes back down into the 30s, 20s for the 24 election. Right. And, and so Biden won 81 million votes with 70 million mail in ballots. Okay. And then you look at all the other stuff that we've gone through with all these elections and what's taken place in particular all these swing states. Okay. Again, all of this stuff lends us to not trust the entities, institutions, but more importantly the people that we've entrusted to, you know, run the country, to run our municipalities, to run all this, our, our geopolitics. And then this leads me to the one that's really kind of sparked this, this evaluation process that I wanted to do this show about. Right. Which is to try and understand the circle jerk of power. And that's the Epstein files. Now I don't know if you saw, but Mike Benz went on, on a Joe Rogan show and did this phenomenal deep dive. Ro Khanna went back on Sean show. You have a lot of people trying to evaluate these files. You have some people now that are saying, oh, it's, it's, he was with Russia and it's all Russian. Then you have other people saying, no, it was, he was working with the Qataris in the Middle East. And then people are saying no, he's a Mossad agent. And some people are saying, no, he worked for the CIA. I believe it's all true. I think there's a shred of reality in all of these accusations. It certainly makes sense that if you understand the historical timeline of his rise to power and then his is what most people would consider a fall from grace by a 2006. Right. Judgment. Right. But then the guy comes back in his meeting with all these other people, Howard Lutnick, heads of different corporations, he's discussing pandemics with bill gates in 17. Right. It's. What it is, I think is not. Yeah, the, the, the catastrophe of the human trafficking in these Young girls and boys being abused is. I mean, everybody who's even remotely affiliated with this should be investigated. And that goes to the whole reason why people are pissed on the, the emails where someone's name is redacted. And, you know, there's like, did you see the video? She's 10 years old, right? You have my authority to kill this person. All. I mean, there's hundreds, if not very damaging pieces of evidence that would pretty much warrant probable cause for deeper investigations. We do know Epstein was investigated by the SEC at Bear Stearns back in the 80s. We do know he was involved in a massive Ponzi scheme where his partner went to jail and he didn't. We know he was involved in this, the child rape or trafficking of, of the early 2000s. And we know he was involved in, in a lot of the influence that was coming with the Clinton foundation, that was coming from other foundations, the Harvard Endowment Fund. He was funding a ton of that. All these other. So we know all that's there. So where, where are the deep dives on that? We know he's got to have a file in the FBI. We know he's got to have a file in the sec. We know he's got to have a file in, in the CIA, which is the one we want. And then all the other documents, the 302s of the victim who were interviewed by the agency, by the Palm Beach County Sheriff's association, other law enforcement agencies. Where are all those doctor Documents unredacted? And that's why this story is so important, because what it shows is, it shows collusion amongst the elites, right? That's what it's explaining to you do. It's not so much of, of this person did that. Well, let's see their name. And where are the pictures of this? And where are the pictures of that? Who are the men they traffic to? Which is another ridiculous thing too. But, but what you have to understand is this is an architecture of this profound circle jerk of power. And so you extrapolate, if that's what's taking place with this one fixer, this individual, right, who's laundering money, running guns, doing funding investments in covert research, propping up, taking down politicians and other famous people with blackmail. Right? Right. If you believe he's the only person out there doing this, you're wrong. In fact, it's my estimation, based on my historical understanding of power, that this is the standard, this is the standard of how it works. Now if you can't deal with that, then, you know, go back to Doing whatever you're doing and keep your head in the sand and, and pay attention to clavicular and all his dumb he's doing on online right now with his masculinity or what do you call it, Jordy? It's called looks maxing. Yeah, yeah. The true downfall of society. That's the true downfall of society looks Maxine. And he said it was all over his feed this week. So I don't even want to digress into that because if, if that's what young people are fixated on, then they're, we're already lost, right? Because it's young people who essentially are the ones that need to make the change. It's the young people that need to revolt against a system that's corrupt or a system that's, that's, that's done. I think it's nihilism. They see all this corruption and they're like, well what's the point? They feel hopeless. A hundred percent. A hundred percent. That's what it is. And when you're demoralized and you're defeated, people give up and on the fight, right? And that's the challenge. Like people are just like, this is the way it is. We're never going to change it. We're just gonna have to suck on it. We're gonna just have to wait till it collapses. But I don't think that's true, true. I don't think that's true for several reasons. One reason you could be the Reconquista of Spain. We had Raymond Ibrahim on to discuss this. And if you're not familiar, right, you had when Islam, when Muhammad died, you know, his right hand man, this general, started the intifadas of Muslim against Christianity and all the other religions of the time in the area. And that spread across all through the Middle east, destroyed thousands, tens of thousands of churches and places and holy sites. Moved through northern Africa, moved out to the step, moved into, you know, Constantinople, right? Moved into the Iberian peninsula, Italy and almost they conquered the entire Iberian peninsula, which was Spain, until finally this great emperor in, in north western Spain said enough and then fought back, which took place for another 400 plus years of fighting Muslims out of the Iberian Peninsula. It started the Crusades in 1090, like 1094, 1092, when those lasted for you know, few hundred years, right? What's another one, the British Reformation, what was that about? It was the absolute corruption of the Catholic Church and the power they had. Which is kind of ironic because what it really was was the corruption of the English rule under Henry vii not being able to get a divorce. So he basically broke from Catholicism and started the Reformation and brought Protestant in under Martin Luth context because he had been writing some stuff and says, no, I'm the new head of the church, so I can get divorced and have someone else. Right? And that's what started this Reformation, which ultimately led to massive divisions in Ireland and Scotland and all through the British Isles, which I is a fascinating time in history. Really made them susceptible to a lot of challenges themselves. Right? You have the American Revolution. Well, it was. The American Revolution was about. About. It was about the financial corruption of the British government over taxing us. I still think it would be funny to like, we could time travel or, you know, have some medium, connect us with, with the founding fathers and be like, hey, what do you think about 37 taxes? What do you think about me having to get taxed on fishing, taxed on driving, taxed on owning a car, taxed on my groceries, taxed on my, you know, taxed on everything you can think about out or even tax when you die. That's right, you're taxed when you die. My. My dad works his whole life in order to leave my brother and I, my family, something. And guess what I'm taxed on the money he was taxed his whole life on. Make it make sense to me, right? French Revolution that turned into a cluster, I'll tell you that, right? They were guillotining people for years. It's because what happens, you, you dismantle the power and it's tough to reassemble the power because what, it's the corrupt, moralist, moral, relevant, relativistic people that step in and be like, nope, I'm in charge. You die. You die. And then you have that civil war merges. You have the, the Russian Revolution, man, that seemed like a great idea. Are you kidding? We'll make the people give the power to the people. We'll get rid of the royals, we'll get rid of the, the elites. We'll get rid of. We'll take them out and then the people will rise and then we'll annihilate all of them. All right, The Chinese Revolution, even worse than the Russian Revolution. And remind you, these are all in the 20th century. This is not even 100 years old. I mean, the Russian Revolution, 100 years old. But the, the rest of it, this is not that old. This is what that takes place. A society gets to the point where people get pissed off, and so they revolt. Now I, I Think, you know, I hear a lot of stuff online about people. Well, that's what we need. We need a revolution. We need to go to war. We need a civil war. We need to collapse the system and rebuild it. And, and the challenge with all that, and I think there's probably maybe 3% of the population that actually could handle that and would survive. But the problem is with all of that is people are. They're not. The obvious nature of the way people are reacting to the level of corruption is people don't want to deal with the conflict that results in standing up for this, to this, this type of corruption because it's carnage. It's. It's hard. That's why you see, you know, people freaking out about the ICE detainees, right? Because you're going to get some guy that was a murderer, rapist, whatever comes over in country, and is he just gonna, like, give up to these people? No. And then you put all the, the, the revolutionaries, the communists, the Marxists, the antifa people, you throw them into the mix, and then it turns into craziness. People get shot defending themselves, whatever it is. And now all of a sudden they. Everybody loses the will to confront the corruption at the level that it is, or the invasion or whatever you want to call it. Right. Illegal immigration is corruption, by the way. Lots of. Of NGOs made hundreds of billions of dollars on facilitating this, both in Europe and in the United States. So. And that's going to be the end of your country as you know it. Because what happens as a result of bringing in all these people who can't work, who can't do it, you, you drive towards socialism, you break the system, and then you get revolution, whatever. All right, so, you know, I think, you know, there's. That's one, right. People say there's no way out of it. We're going to revolution. But they're not even considering about the mass carnage and chaos that place with that. I think the other one that people talk a lot about is. Or they give up on, and they're like, hey, well, you know, we can't vote our way out of it, you know, or people are. I. Let me retract that. People are saying, well, let's vote our way out of it. And then natural response is you're just voting for someone who's going to be corrupt anyway, so we can't vote our way out of it. It's bull. And when we try and vote our way out of it, look at what's happened. There's mail in balloting There's Dominion machines, there's, there's this corruption in the polls, the polling numbers, the voter rolls. Corruption everywhere, at every level. So the system's rigged to put in whoever they want at whenever they want, people who will do whatever they tell them to do. So I'm just not gonna vote. I'm just out. I'm just done. I'm gonna find my own little space. I'm gonna keep my head down. I'm gonna prepare. What are you gonna do? What, just gonna let it happen? I mean, what you're doing is you, you might be able to get through it with you, but your children are going to feel it for sure. Our children are going to feel this. Hands down, Jordy. Sorry, but Bug is going to feel this, buddy. It just is what it is. So that's the reality of not voting. So, you know, what's the other way? I think the other way is really about. And this is, I, I keep going back to this. What I think the, the number one thing that could happen is there's a shift in the existing political system where we, we, we remove the power from the two party system and we bring in power to a third or fourth or fifth party system. Right. We have to create an alternative form. And I think the easiest way to do it based on the numbers is you see independence growing rapidly because the other sides are becoming more and more radicalized. So they're, they're shrinking maybe 25% of those. So you have this massive middle ground of about 45, 50% of the population that are independent in nature. So what I suggest is we move away from traditional packs or lobbying and we try and start a new political power. Obviously, Elon Musk tried to start that. It hasn't gained much traction. I think where you'll really see it is after the midterms, you're going to see a massive shift towards this independent party, and you'll see independent candidates emerge. But what it really requires is large groups of people collectivizing, and I know that's a horrible word to use, but collectivizing under the banner of a certain moral framework that they can get behind. All right, now, what is the moral framework? So my Christian self says, well, that's easy. We're going to build this around Christ. And if I do that, I'm, I'm pretty naive because we're all sinners and no matter what, people are going to sin. So let's, let's drill down on some more specific details of what people have to adhere to. Whatever this, these new packs are. So I came up with a list, a short list of some, some basic things that I believe should be on this list of this new pack. And this pack. We, we fund this thing, we get it big, you know, $10, $12, $100, $20. Much like act Blue, right. But now it's for this new independent, right. Where we can deliver disputed and distribute it any place we want, want. And here is the list of things that comes in. All right, so first and foremost, no outside money from companies, lobbyists, foreign governments or any other type of nefarious scheme. Right? You can have political action committees and super PACs or whatever. But that transparency, if someone takes dollars that come from Pfizer or someone takes dollars that comes from the NRA or someone takes dollars or whatever, then, then it has to be like part of the scorecard on people's things on, on, on, on where people are taking money. I mean obviously people are going to take money because they got to pay for their own campaigns or whatever it is. But that has to be fundamental in the way it looks. All right. The other is term limits. You can only serve 12 years. That's the key, 12 years. Because even in 12 years it doesn't seem like people can generate that much fake wealth from their position of power. Plus if they're only in for 12 years, right. More chances are likely that they're going to be strictly focused on their constituents. Right now constituents obviously are companies and where they're from and what's going to benefit them and what's going to happen. So it's going to be challenged. I didn't say it's going to be easy, but it's going to be challenged. But term limits, the next one is no insider trading. You have to make a vow that you will not insider trade while you're in government position. That's, that's non negotiable transparency. An open email system, right? So where you have a real time tracker of emails in your, in your, your, your government, right. That people can see the emails going back and forth, right? And then the other aspect of that is if you don't, and someone foias you, if you don't get them the requested information specifically within a 30 day period, you pay a massive fine of a hundred thousand dollars a day until you get it, until you release the things and that way because it's all, it's all our information. Every single document that's out there that hasn't been classified as, as top secret, which is over a Billion documents which that has to go through a huge change in, in evaluation on how things are classified. But every document is your document. If you work for the, the U.S. government or your state government, your municipality, you were placed there by the people who elected you. So they have a right to see what you're communicating on their behalf. So 30 day moratorium on a FOIA and then you have to or a hundred thousand dollar fine from your own campaign finances, not from the, not from the state or anything but your own finances. All right, the next one is no voting on omnibus bills. If you vote on an ominous bill, automatically cut out of any money whatsoever. Right? These are ridiculous. This is where the problem of the spending is going. And until that stopped, it's not going the other way. All right? You have to promise to expose corruption. It's got to be a part of your campaign and a part of your actions. If you don't expose corruption within your first six months and often office automatically you're out, you're done. You're not going to get another dime, you're going to be exposed. Right? You have to expose corruption. There has to be a committee within your, your government that, that exposes corruption. Fundamentally, that's a main part. All right, the next one is that you commit to secure elections, which means voter id, right. Proof of citizenship in day voting and hard constraints on any matter out mail in or absentee balloting. Right? That's it. Those are the three. They have to be in place at any level, from county commission all the way to State senator all the way to President United States. All of that has to be in there. The next one is you have to be financially dedicated to bringing back the middle class. So that's, that's business loans, business financing to small businesses that are building infrastructure, that are industry, whether it's in the medical field or it's bringing back manufacturing stuff, whatever that looks like to bring back the healthy middle class. That has to be a part of your financial commitment. All right, no new wars. Now don't get me wrong, limited military strikes. I understand the necessity of power restructure. I get all that. I understand the Venezuela thing. I think it was a necessary evil that took place. I'm stoked there wasn't an overthrow of the entire government. But, but no new wars. That's it, right? No new words. And then the last one is justice reforms, right? There has to be put into place some type of evaluation of the way the justice system works in your sphere of influence. And then, and then you have to work to try and fix it. Whether it's in family court, that's crazy. Or it's civil courts, or it's criminal courts, or it's, you know, federal judges or on the bench or whatever it might be. Like there's got to be justice reform because, you know, without your vote, without financial opportunities and without a, a legitimate justice system, you got nothing anyways. So those are the list of things that I think that we should implement in order to be able to disrupt this circle jerk of power. All right, saying all that to say this, I still have hope. I mean, America's fought through some pretty hard times in the past, but I think people are rapidly losing their, their optimism. I'm here to say, keep it. Great movements have come out of great people that didn't want to do anything right. That we were forced into the game. And that's what's taking place right now. Now you are being forced into the game. And don't, don't worry, you are not, it's not your fault. It's not your decision. There are people that are playing the hands that they stole in order to continue to enrich themselves and their other buddies at this high level corruption. And the only people are going to stop them are those who have courage, willing to fight for the fundamental moral framework of what we believe the country is essentially founded on, on. And that's strong Christian beliefs with a fair economic and political system that gives opportunities for every kind of person at every level. And that's what America is. I believe it's possible and I believe if you're willing to fight, so am I. And we can get it done. All right everybody, I hope you've enjoyed the show. Please don't be afraid to like share and promote it to your friends. If you want to know more about what we got going on, check out our newsletter. Sign up for that. We've got some interesting things coming up in the future that Jordy and I are working on. We're going to do some more motivational stuff for people, performance coaching stuff. You can check out our, our online coaching courses@davidrutherford.com we're thinking about trying to do some unique stuff within interview process and different forums, that kind of thing. We got a lot of new exciting things on Horizon, so thank you so much for joining us. Thank Jesus, thank Christ for everything and never lose the faith. Hoo yah. This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.
Podcast: The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
Episode: David Rutherford Show — The Circle Jerk of Corruption: Exposing Global Power Schemes & How to Fight Back
Date: February 11, 2026
Host: David "Instructor Rut" Rutherford
Producer: iHeartPodcasts
David Rutherford (a.k.a. Instructor Rut) delivers an uncompromising and energetic solo episode focused on the "circle jerk of power" — a term he uses to describe the pervasive and entrenched corruption spanning U.S. and global institutions. Using recent and historical examples, Rutherford argues that collusion and self-enrichment among elites have become standard practice in government, business, and non-governmental organizations. The episode fosters a sense of urgency but ultimately offers a framework of hope and actionable reforms that everyday people can support.
"There has been a profound amount of corruption being exposed across the board … not only in America, but overseas."
"Even people that are good people…they get that temptation and they bite on it because why? Because, well, that guy’s doing it and she’s doing it. Why shouldn’t I do it? Get mine while I’m here.”
“How many nations have been overthrown… Iran… Venezuela… Guess who was around the round table? All the top oil executives."
"These are Republicans… we’re not going to investigate any of this. In fact, we’re going to work with the Biden Justice Department…"
"What you have to understand is this is an architecture of this profound circle jerk of power."
"People don’t want to deal with the conflict that results in standing up to this type of corruption because it’s carnage." ([30:11])
"What you're doing is… you might get through it… but your children are going to feel it for sure."
"We have to create an alternative form… a new political power… under the banner of a certain moral framework."
“Those are the list of things… that we should implement in order to be able to disrupt this circle jerk of power.”
“I still have hope… If you’re willing to fight, so am I. And we can get it done.”
"Corruption's corruption. Both sides do it." ([09:55])
“I don’t know if it’s hopelessness, but there’s certainly a very pessimistic outlook of what’s going to take place.” ([02:05])
"If that’s what young people are fixated on, then we’re already lost… because it’s the young people who need to make the change.” ([26:45])
“The obvious nature of the way people are reacting … is people don't want to deal with the conflict… because it's carnage.” ([30:13])
"Now you are being forced into the game. And don’t, don’t worry, you are not… at fault… The only people going to stop them are those who have courage." ([45:01])
Episode Tone:
Direct, impassioned, urgent, with moments of dark humor and fundamental faith in people’s ability to create change.
End of Summary