Hour 1 - Democrat Identity Crisis

Summary

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show: Hour 1 - Democrat Identity Crisis

Podcast Information:

• Title: The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
• Host/Author: Premiere Networks
• Description: Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics, and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.
• Episode: Hour 1 - Democrat Identity Crisis
• Release Date: March 6, 2025

---

Summary:

In the March 6, 2025 episode of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, hosts Clay Travis and Buck Sexton delve deep into what they perceive as a significant identity crisis within the Democratic Party. The episode, titled "Democrat Identity Crisis," features a robust discussion on the party's leadership struggles, media strategies, and the potential ramifications for upcoming elections.

1. Introduction to the Democrat Party's Identity Crisis

Clay Travis opens the discussion by highlighting a series of events that underscore his view of the Democratic Party's current turmoil. He references the censure of Al Green, a senior Democratic figure, and a concerning video of Democratic congresswomen, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), attempting to portray themselves as boxers—an effort Travis views as awkward and ineffective in connecting with younger voters.

Clay Travis [02:24]: "They are lost and I thought that this was a good representation of the loss."

2. Analysis of Democrat Leadership and Candidates

The hosts focus on Tim Walz, the current leader of the Democratic Party, critiquing his responses to questions about party leadership. Walz's inability to name a clear leader, other than attributing it to the "American public," is seen as indicative of the party's lack of direction.

Clay Travis [03:12]: "I think the silence was telling there, Buck, because he didn't say Kamala Harris, which I think would have been an easy answer."

Buck Sexton echoes this sentiment, suggesting that Walz's responses reflect the overall disarray within the party.

Buck Sexton [03:52]: "I think if you ask Tim Walz a really simple and straightforward question, you're unlikely to get a particularly intelligent answer."

The discussion then shifts to potential Democratic leaders like Gavin Newsom and the challenges they face in appealing to a broader electorate. Travis points out the difficulty Democrats have in presenting a unified and appealing front, especially when considering the diverse and often conflicting interests within the party.

3. Democrat Party's Media Strategy and Its Efficacy

Travis and Sexton critique the Democratic Party's media strategies, arguing that their attempts to engage with different demographics, particularly younger voters, fall flat and appear disingenuous. The hosts cite the aforementioned video of Democratic congresswomen as evidence of the party's missteps in media engagement.

Clay Travis [06:03]: "The Democrats fundamentally have become a party led by and led on behalf of weirdos. That doesn't look good."

Buck Sexton expands on this by discussing how Democrats are struggling to adapt to new media landscapes, leading to ineffective communication and a failure to resonate with the broader public.

4. Impact on Elections and Republican Advantages

A significant portion of the conversation revolves around the implications of the Democratic Party's struggles for upcoming elections. Travis emphasizes the success of Republican candidates in key battleground states, suggesting that if Donald Trump can win in states like Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan, Republican candidates have a solid chance of securing Senate seats in these regions.

Clay Travis [11:05]: "Trump won Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan. Just those four. They all have double Democrat senators. If Trump can win that state, then to me, a really good, solid Republican candidate in those states should be able to win, too."

Buck Sexton builds on this by discussing the ambitious goal of securing 60 Senate seats, which would grant Republicans significant control over legislative processes.

Buck Sexton [12:21]: "60 Senate seats would allow transformative outcomes in the United States."

5. Role of Social Media and Traditional Media in Political Debates

The hosts explore the evolving landscape of political media, lamenting the decline of substantial debate formats on mainstream networks like CNN and MSNBC. They compare current media interactions to past shows like Crossfire and Firing Line, which featured more substantive head-to-head discussions.

Clay Travis [20:31]: "There used to be real debates out there... But those don't really rate and exist now for real debate in your mind or does it only work on social media?"

Buck comments on the shift towards more fragmented media consumption, where debates are often reduced to clipped segments that circulate on social platforms, thereby losing their original context and depth.

6. Future Outlook for the Democrat Party

Travis and Sexton are cautiously pessimistic about the Democratic Party's future. They argue that without a clear and charismatic leader, the party may continue to flounder, especially as Republican strategies become more effective. The hosts predict that Democrats will need to undergo a significant transformation to regain their footing and appeal to a broader electorate.

Buck Sexton [31:20]: "It's funny, isn't it? That's all we're really talking about. But they're going to have to change the way that they're presented because there are a lot of people that will vote Democrat no matter what."

7. Interaction with Callers and Historical Insights

The episode includes an interaction with a caller from Houston, Mike, who brings up Texas history, specifically Alamo Day, and references to William Barrett Travis's "Letter." This historical nod serves to draw parallels between past and present political struggles, reinforcing the show's theme of leadership and identity crises.

Mike [34:55]: "So I just thought for, you know, Clay's namesake, William Barrett Travis's letter... It reminded me of how he addresses that letter."

Clay and Buck adeptly tie these historical references back to their ongoing analysis of contemporary political dynamics, emphasizing the cyclical nature of political challenges.

8. Conclusion and Final Thoughts

As the episode concludes, Travis and Sexton reiterate their concerns about the Democratic Party's direction and leadership. They express confidence in Republican strategies and the potential for significant gains in upcoming elections, underscoring the importance of effective media engagement and clear party identity.

Clay Travis [36:41]: "And they don't make good arguments... They just look profoundly dorky and unfun."

Key Takeaways:

• The Democratic Party is perceived to be undergoing an identity crisis, lacking clear leadership and effective strategies to engage voters.
• Tim Walz's leadership is critiqued as ineffective, reflecting broader disarray within the party.
• Republican strategies, particularly those aligned with Donald Trump, are viewed as gaining traction in key battleground states.
• The evolution of media consumption, especially the dominance of social media clips over substantive debates, is impacting political discourse.
• Historical parallels are drawn to emphasize recurring challenges in political leadership and party identity.

Notable Quotes:

• "They are lost and I thought that this was a good representation of the loss." — Clay Travis [02:24]
• "I think if you ask Tim Walz a really simple and straightforward question, you're unlikely to get a particularly intelligent answer." — Buck Sexton [03:52]
• "60 Senate seats would allow transformative outcomes in the United States." — Buck Sexton [12:21]
• "They are going to have to change the way that they're presented because there are a lot of people that will vote Democrat no matter what." — Buck Sexton [31:20]

---

This detailed summary encapsulates the critical discussions and insights presented by Clay Travis and Buck Sexton in their exploration of the Democratic Party's current challenges, offering listeners a comprehensive overview of the episode's key themes and takeaways.

Transcript

[Clay Travis]

Welcome in Clay Travis, Buck Sexton Show. Buck and I working late into the evening last night in Nashville. Buck now back in Miami. I am still here in Nashville. I spent my morning thank you to my son's 4th grade class at Career Day. Fun time going in for Career Day. Lots of the parents are listeners, by the way, so appreciate all of you. I don't know that we have very many fourth grade listeners, but if we do, we love all of you and you're all very smart. Thank you for listening. Listening. We got a lot to dive into. We're going to be joined by Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas in the third hour. Just FYI, lots of senators wanting to come by and talk with all of you about a variety of different issues that are going on out there. But Buck, I wanted to start with what seems like a clear identity crisis in the Democrat Party. They spent all morning fighting the censure of al green, a 70 some odd year old man who was kicked out of the speech Tuesday night that Trump gave and has now been censured by the House. But really he just looked like a doddering old man kind of waving his cane randomly and haphazardly in the well of the House of Representatives. And this morning I wake up and as I'm getting ready to go talk to the fourth graders at my son's elementary school, I saw a video that I thought was satire, but it's actually a bunch of Democrat congresswomen, including aoc, pretending that they are actually boxers ready for the fight. And the amount of just cringe worthy videos that I have seen from the Democrat Party as they attempt to connect with, I presume, young voters is the idea of what they're trying to, trying to get into. I just, I, they are lost and I thought that this was a good representation of the loss. Tim Walls, who is, I would say, a middle aged lesbian woman's idea of a man that will appeal to men. Is that fair? Buck? Does it Tim Walls look to you like a lesbian middle aged woman would be? Like, this is a guy that's really going to speak to men.

[Buck Sexton]

Your analysis is always astute, sir.

[Clay Travis]

Tim Walls, a middle aged lesbian's idea of a masculine man is asked who is the leader of the Democrat Party? And this is what it sounded like on cnn. Enjoy.

[Tim Walz]

Sir, who do you think the leader of the Democratic Party is right now?

[Unknown]

I think the voting public right now is what I would say. And I keep telling that we're not going to have a charismatic leader ride in here and save us from this And I would argue that the Tea Party as it arose out of the aca. Well, where was that charismatic leader is John Boehner and Mitch McConnell and a whole bunch of angry folks at town halls that had members of Congress like myself answering questions. So when people are looking around, where's the leaders or whatever, they are going to organically step up?

[Clay Travis]

Okay, Buck, the pause was telling he eventually said the leader is the American public because they picked their ok. But I think the silence was was telling there, Buck, because he didn't say Kamala Harris, which I think would have been an easy answer. And he could have just said, look, she was the nominee for President 2024. She got 75 million votes. She's the most popular Democrat politician right now. Barack Joe Biden and Barack Obama are retired. Kamala would have been an easy answer here. It's not a crazy question to expect that you might get. What is your take on Tim Wall's eventually saying, oh, the American people are the leader and what does it say about the Democrat Party right now?

[Buck Sexton]

I think if you ask Tim Walz a really simple and straightforward question, you're unlikely to get a particularly intelligent answer. So to ask him something for which I think, to be fair, there really isn't a good answer right now.

[Clay Travis]

Yes.

[Buck Sexton]

Puts him on the spot. To me, it's more about the obvious state of the Democrat Party than it is how Walls answered the question one way or the other. Because to say Kamala would be to steer right into more more of the defeat that they've already been suffering the aftermath of. So I think that's not where they would want to go. And they're the real answer. I mean the smart answer would be to say, oh, we have and this the Democrat Party until a minute ago would have answered it this way. Oh, we have a deep bench. Remember, they used to love to say that we have a deep bench. And they would rattle off a bunch of names like Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer and Kamala Harris and I can't even and it's up to the Democrat voter who's going to lead in the next election. But we have so many instead. He looks completely flabbergasted. And I think that a big part of that is any of the people that would come to mind as the names for the Democrat leadership right now, even among Democrats, could be a liability. In just a few months, it could become very clear that this isn't or you don't know when it will become clear that this is not a person that you actually think the Democrats can rally behind and can do anything meaningful to bring their party out of the nosedive that it is still going through. So, yeah, I think that when you look at Democrat leadership, you're going to have to see some of these individuals who I just named presenting themselves to unfriendly media, which will be very interesting. I think they're going to have to go outside of the usual left wing ideological bubble zones just in order to make them seem normal. The problem the Democrats have fundamentally is that they became a party led by and led on behalf of weirdos. That doesn't look good. And Tim Walsh, of course, tried the JD Vance is weird. JD Vance is maybe the least weird politician I've ever seen in my life. That was not a good attack.

[Clay Travis]

Also, to me, the answer says Tim Walls may be thinking that he is the answer and that he's planning on running for president. And because if he says someone else, then maybe it's a little bit harder to fundraise. Maybe it's a little bit harder to actually argue that you should be the face of the Democrat Party. To me, when he's saying, oh, it's the people, he's then going to claim, oh, I can go be the voice of the people. I think he thinks that he has a future in the Democrat Party and I think the challenge for him is Tim Walls is not going to appeal to men. And we can maybe get into Gavin Newsom, who I think is trying to come back out of the California wildfire debacle and reassert himself as a national spokesperson for Democrats and Buck. What is Gavin Newsom trying to claim? That he's actually a moderate, middle of the road, centrist Democrat, which suggests to me that he is aware of just how toxic the left wing of his party has been and that having a fight with them is not necessarily the worst thing that could happen for his political future. I think the problem is, do you really believe that, that one, Democrats want to. Want to put forward a white guy? Maybe they do. But two, that Gavin Newsom coming from California, given what just happened to Kamala Harris, is a California Democrat really on the national stage damaged by what happened with Kamala Harris, or do you think Buck Kamala is her uniquely own character and so her background doesn't really matter because she's got to figure out what her next step is too, which is its own funny story as well.

[Buck Sexton]

Well, I think you can only have one alpha dog in any state in American politics right now of the same party. Right. So I think that Gavin Newsom is very clearly trying to. I know he just launched his podcast. Clay, are you going to go on the Gavin Newsom podcast?

[Clay Travis]

I haven't been invited, but I would. I mean, I'll go and talk to anybody, as long as it's not edited. Like, I don't want to talk to somebody for an hour and have them clip six minutes randomly of it. As long as it's the full conversation, I'll go on. Anyone that has a substantial, by the way, substantial audience. I don't want to go on you and your brother's podcast that you just started. But, yes, I'm busy. Yes, I would do it. Would you?

[Buck Sexton]

I would go on you and your brother's podcast. I think Clay is being very mean.

[Clay Travis]

I don't have time to go on you and your brother's podcast unless it was the Kelsey brothers, maybe. They have a big podcast.

[Buck Sexton]

Apparently they have a huge following, which is amazing to me.

[Clay Travis]

I don't understand that at all, because I don't think they have anything interesting to say at all. But evidently it works. What would you do? Gavin Newsom's podcast?

[Buck Sexton]

Oh, absolutely. I think. Look, I'm. It's funny because they asked if I would. If I would go on Fox this afternoon, Clay, and they have a former Obama. Obama guy. We're going to have some debate or something. I mean, it'll be three minutes long. We'll both get to talk one and a half times, probably. But, you know, I'll make my points. I'll make his points. It's interesting, though, because Fox News for a while was, as you know, frozen out by Democrats. They refused to go on, really. Generally, the only Democrats who would go on were Clay pigeons. They were there to get blown to smithereens on air and, you know, for the amusement of the audience. And I think that that's changing now because they have to. They have to just switch things up that they can't continue on with the current trajectory because it's not only that their party lost, it's that they don't have the same control of the information ecosystem that they used to. So they can't just rely on the New York Times, CNN axis of evil to propagate all kinds of nonsense all over the country because people aren't watching and people don't care. They don't have the same gravitas that. That they even were managing, I think, up until this election. So you're going to see more Democrats crossing over into unfriendly media because they have to which will expose them, by the way, because most of them are actually not up to the task and not up to the challenge of making their arguments. Tim Walls certainly isn't. I mean, Tim Walls got so schooled by JD Vance in the debate, I almost started to feel kind of bad for him, you know, but then I remind. Then I remind myself that he had a snitch line over Covid. I'm like, nope, nope, he deserves it. Uh, but the Democrats don't have anybody right now who I think is particularly adept in that forum of presentation and exchange of ideas on the political side. I don't think they have. They don't have a particularly strong team on the media side either right now. So I sit here and I keep looking for worthy adversaries on the left, and all I see are people who insist on pretending that men don't actually have an advantage over women in sports, etcetera, etcetera. It's sad out there right now for the Democrats, which is why Trump's got to hit the accelerator and keep going.

[Clay Travis]

Yeah, not only that, but I really think. I know next year is the. Is the midterm, and a lot will happen between now and the midterms, but if you look at the battlegrounds, Trump won Nevada, Trump won Arizona. Trump won Georgia. Trump won Michigan. Just those four. They all have double Democrat senators. If Trump can win that state, then to me, a really good, solid Republican candidate in those states should be able to win, too. That's eight seats, Buck. That's eight seats. It's not even counting Fetterman. It's not even counting the. The Wisconsin. Other states that Trump won that have Democrat senators. I'm just saying, like, at a minimum, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan and Georgia should have at least one Republican senator, based on the fact of how Republicans have done. And I think that's setting up for a disaster potentially going forward for Democrats.

[Buck Sexton]

The big goal here, because I think that there has been a sense that the best that Trump is going to have for a wide open field is the next 18 months, which I believe is likely to be the case. People are starting to talk about 60 Senate seats now.

[Clay Travis]

I know.

[Buck Sexton]

And that's. Now you're talking about anything the Republicans really want to get done, they'd be in a position to do if they got 60 Senate seats. I know that the midterms feels like it's a long way off now. We just finished this election, but why not have that goal, right? Why not look at it as, instead of, oh, we're going to lose some Seats in the midterms, which tends to be the historical trajectory. Why not say keep the pressure on, keep the executive orders going, keep Doge flowing, keep it all happening and maybe we can get to 60 Senate seats as the goal and then you can really transform things and you can do it without Trump having to even face a reelection, which means things could get. If you think his executive orders are interesting, just wait until we get to 60 Senate seats and a majority in the House. Although we got to get there first.

[Clay Travis]

60 Senate seats would truly allow transformative outcomes in the United States. As we talked to Senator Thune, the majority leader, that's the number you have to get to to really be able to get things moving in a rapid fashion in the Senate because otherwise they'll hold it up. Now Republicans have never had 60 seats in the Senate.

[Buck Sexton]

Have they not?

[Clay Travis]

I can't, I mean, I, I don't know historically if the Republic. It's a good question for our team to look up. I don't know if historically Republicans have ever had 60 Senate seats. I don't think it's ever happened in anybody listenings recent, like in the last 40 or 50 years. It certainly hasn't ever happened. That's a good question. That, that's why it would be so transformative. Again, we're not talking about simple majority. We're talking about a basically filibuster proof majority, which would be extraordinary.

[Buck Sexton]

Yeah, I think the last time the GOP had 56 seats back in 1929.

[Clay Travis]

So that's the high water mark 100 years ago. I mean that's.

[Buck Sexton]

I believe so. I mean that's just me going fast here with, with Google. I gotta start using Grok more. Have you seen what people are pulling with Grok?

[Clay Travis]

Oh, have I seen it? I'm like, oh yeah, well, yeah, yeah, you, you are what, they're pulling beams. Yeah, totally.

[Buck Sexton]

We will dive into more of this in a second here. Also want to take some of your calls. 800-282-2882. So I've got it right here in my hand chalk daily and it's a good name for it because this is the chalk that I take daily. Boost free and total testosterone. Contains 500 milligrams of Prima V shilajit and supports lean muscle mass. I've been on a health journey for six months. I feel better, I'm sleeping better, I'm in better shape, I'm stronger, faster, all those good things. Now diet and exercise, huge part of that. Don't ever forget, we all know that but proper supplementation for the energy, for the drive and the focus to get through your day and to get the most benefit from the work that you're putting in, whether it's on the gym, on the track, wherever. That's where our friends at Chalk come in. Chalk has a male vitality stack set of supplements with a leading ingredient that replenishes diminished testosterone levels in guys. That's your body's natural source of energy. When your testosterone levels are low, and that's evident in more guys than ever these days, just turn on cnn. Chalk's male vitality stack can replenish it by up to 20% in just three months time. Use My Name Buck as your promo code to get a good size discount on any Chalk subscription for life. Go online to chalk.com choq.com use my name Buck for that massive 2025 discount on any subscription for life. I'm going to take my chalk daily as soon as we go into the commercial break here. So in the meantime, go to chalk.comchoq.com and use my name Buck while you're making your purchase.

[Unknown]

You ain't imagining it. The world has gone insane. Reclaim your sanity with Clay and Buck. Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Buck Sexton]

Welcome back into Clay and Buck. You know what's really interesting is Scott Jennings having a lot of fun over at cnn. This is Cut four. We just played the clip of Tim Walsh, who's the leader of the Democrat Party. Something we've been asking on this show since the election because there is no good answer for the Democrats and no one really has. No one really has an answer, which is because there isn't one. But here is Scott Jennings over at cnn. He's having too much fun over there these days. You know, it should be illegal to have as much fun as he's having crushing libs play for.

[Tim Walz]

Walls has no idea what happened last night because he has always been and remains in over his head. The reality is Donald Trump had a perfectly good night because he articulates issues that the vast majority of the American people are basically in alignment with. And the Democrats had a terrible night because they acted like children, just like Fetterman said. I was interested to see Walls attack fetterman. The 2028 Democratic primary for president is obviously on. And if that's the best they have to offer, I mean, look who, who are. I don't know who the leader of the Democratic Party is, but I know who runs it. Donald Trump. He runs both parties.

[Buck Sexton]

Just I don't roughshod running roughshod over the opposition.

[Clay Travis]

So question for you and let's talk about this when we come back. CNN and MSNBC are tanking. The conflict debates seem to play well on social media. That is Scott Jennings going up against the Democrat talking heads ricochets. Well, he's doing a good job on this. Is there actually now, Buck, do you think we'll talk about it when we come back, a market for real debate again in the world of politics. In other words, if you were managing CNN and msnbc, given their collapse, would that work or no? Let's have a little fun discussing that when we come back. In the meantime, prize picks we won last night, gave you out a pick based on the Tennessee and Ole Miss game. Congrats to the Rebels on that win. And gave you out a pick based on the Florida and Alabama game. The Gators got the win in that one. Gonna give you more picks. With March Madness underway soon, maybe even officially, March Madness season already, we've got Major League Baseball back before the end of the month. We got the NHL playoffs, NBA playoffs soon, nascar, whatever you like. Your favorite players are on prize picks and you can join over 13 million downloaded members. You can play in California, you can play in Texas, you can play in Georgia and you get 50 bucks when you sign up right now. Prizepix.com Code Clay that's prizepix.com Code clay. Welcome back in Clay. Travis BUCK Sexton SHOW Appreciate all of you hanging out with us. We are rolling through the Thursday edition of the program. Buck, I asked you as we went to break in the last segment, certainly Scott Jennings, who we've had on the show I think a couple of times, has been doing a really good job on CNN as their token Republican defender. And they have an entire panel of Democrat morons who try to argue with them and he often slices and dices them. That is plays well on social media. It hasn't really cut through. If you look at the ratings I saw when Brett Baier interviewed Zelensky, this numbers were out. They were just massive for Brett Baier, like all time highs. I saw for the president's address on Tuesday and some of you keep it was an address to Congress, not a State of the Union. Ok. All right. I appreciate it. The president's basically State of the Union, which is a little bit different because we have the election that happens and it doesn't happen till March. But 10 million people watched Fox, 1.9 million watched CNN, 1.9 million watched MSNBC, we're talking about Fox regularly now posting 70% share on cable news. Do you think there's a market for actual debate which would actually be going back in time? Remember Tucker Carlson used to be on the show Crossfire? You would have a legitimate head to head discussion on cnn. That was the way they covered it back. Even Hannity used to be on with. Was it Combs?

[Buck Sexton]

Oh, I was a Hannity. I was an avid Hannity and Combs watcher back when I was in college. So yeah, I remember.

[Clay Travis]

So those don't really rate and exist now for that for real debate in your mind or does it only work on social media? Clipped versions.

[Buck Sexton]

You can take it all the way back to what Firing line with William F. Buckley and William F. Buckley and Gore Vidal at the convention.

[Clay Travis]

There used to be real debates out there and other than like Bill Maher where you can get a smart, sometimes smart Republican ish person and a smart Democrat ish person, there aren't real debate shows other than what CNN's trying with Scott Jennings.

[Buck Sexton]

What I think happened with, with the Democrat media ecosystem, which we used to call the mainstream media, but I think rightly people abandoned that term because why give them the credibility of calling them the mainstream media? Why are they mainstream? So I agree with that. But the corporate Democrat media, legacy media, however you want to describe it, they used to control so much of the piping, if you will, that the content could be whatever they wanted it to be. And there wasn't really much in the way of an infrastructure on the other side for competition. Exceptions being of course Rush talk radio, Fox News, but those were relatively recent. I mean when you start to compare this to the New York Times, I mean when you compare this to some of the outlets that the Democrats have been able to rely on, they, they've been running this game for a long time. You go all the way back to what's his name, Cronkite. And you go back to the, the days when there were only a handful of TV news anchors that had tremendous sway over, over public opinion. They were libs, by the way, but not libs in the current context. Libs back then. And I would just say what's happened, Clay, is that the social media gave them a big jolt of control all over again. And then they became these echo chambers of insanity where you could just start promoting the craziest ideas from college campuses in the. I don't know, I want to say maybe in the early 2000s you start to see this maybe toward the end or middle to end of the Bush administration bubbling up more and more. Obama administration comes along and all of a sudden you have the mainstreaming of socialism, left wing radical ideas, extremely poisonous DEI and race politics. And all of this, you know, gets, gets completely injected into the American body politic for eight years of Obama. But then things just got crazier and crazier and under Biden, well under Covid really. And then, you know, for Biden's term, I think they just reached, I don't know if you know, there's like terminal velocity, isn't that when you're, you jump out of a plane and you go to the absolute fastest speed that your mass can travel? I think that's terminal velocity. It was, there was a bad movie in the 90s based on.

[Clay Travis]

That's what immediately comes to mind is the movie. But yeah, but I think that's terminal velocity.

[Buck Sexton]

I think Democrats under Biden politically had reached terminal insanity. They got about as crazy as they could be and now they're dealing with the backlash from a majority of the American people of you guys can't just be totally insane. You can't have a dementia puppet as the president. And we all then see it and we all know it and you don't suffer political consequences. The Democrats deeply deserve the pathetic and ignominious post election party that they are mired in right now. It's exactly what they should have. They earned this, they own this. So let them wallow a bit. Let them be sad.

[Clay Travis]

They don't make good arguments and to a large extent they don't make good arguments because they don't have to grapple with the other side's argument. Because when you have convinced yourself that your opponent is Adolf Hitler, your argument doesn't have to be that good. Right? I mean, I think that's in their mind what we saw. Even Gavin Newsom, who I think is a relatively intelligent Democrat, Ron DeSantis wiped the floor with him when Sean Hannity hosted their debate about a year and a half ago, or whatever it was you remember, that basically came down to Covid leadership, of course.

[Buck Sexton]

But on the Hitler comparison, which we used to talk about here with some frequency in the lead at the election because it was daily programming at msnbc, it was, he was Hitler, he was Hitler. And it's you really, how can you think you're a serious person? How could you think of yourself as a public intellectual or however they want to, A pundit, whatever, however you want to describe yourself if you're going to say that a, a recent American president who is leading your candidate in the polls, who also happens to be by far the choice of the entire state of Israel, if they were able to. We all know this. I think Trump is, outside of America, probably more popular in Israel than any other country in the world.

[Clay Travis]

Not that I generally, Trump is popular in Israel like he's popular in West Virginia or Wyoming, states that he won by the largest ish margins in the 2024 election. That contextualizes it.

[Buck Sexton]

And I just think if you can, if you were trying to be at all a serious person, you'd have to say, I don't think the guy who has the overwhelming support of the entire population of the Jewish state is Hitlerian. Yes, I don't think you could be a serious person. And I, I remember, you know, I, when I had the, the sit down, you mentioned Bill Maher, and Bill was trying to be reasonable, and there were a couple of Democrats at that table. They were just shrieking about the same nonsense about racism and the insurrection and all this stuff. And they forgot that people actually care about what's happening in the country right now. That's reality to them. They care about the economy, they care about the border, they care about crime. They care about things that are measurable and real, not just narratives that create emotionally destabilized zombies running around talking about the insurrection all the time. And so this is, I think it's, this is my way of saying, clay Democrats need this. It's like a cleansing of their souls that is going on right now. It's a reset that must occur because they really went insane.

[Clay Travis]

I think there's a lot of truth to that. And there is on social media, a great demand for the intersection. We'll play some, some Gavin Newsom. And it seems to me that Gavin Newsom is trying to engage in some way with people on the other side of the aisle. I think there's a desperate demand, actually, for that. I'm not sure it translates on television because, Buck, you're going to do Fox News in a little bit. And I know Fox News has a massive audience, but from a social media perspective, it often feels like basically television exists. So that small segments of television can be clipped and shared on social media, whether it's TikTok, whether it's Instagram reels, whether it's, whether it's Twitter. If you go on and look at oftentimes what is popular or what is trending, a huge percentage of the time it's somebody taking a couple of minutes from video. It doesn't just have to be television. Right. It could be a podcast version of video, whatever else that's popular on YouTube. It is just video that's pulled and then put to circulate on social media. So I guess one of the things I wonder about because we were talking about Scott Jennings is to what extent is what's popular on social media reflective of what would be popular on television? And in many ways, given the fact that television is running into video all over the Internet, what is television even exist and look like in the years ahead? What I do know is Democrats have lost the ability, if you look at that video they put up of all the women boxing and everything else to connect with younger people on social media. They just look profoundly dorky and unfun. And that is not a good recipe for how to cut through in this current era. And I think it's emblematic of why Republicans have done so well with men because men look at some of the stuff that's being put out by Democrats and just roll their eyes over the fact that they have gone completely insane.

[Buck Sexton]

Yes. And I don't think it's going to get better for them any anytime soon. I think it's likely to continue as it is right now. On the points about Democratic leadership, I mean Harry Entin, this is Cut five. He says that at the speech, the Democrats reaction to Trump's speech, which we talked to you about earlier in the week, shows just why the Democrat Party is really at its least popular has ever been. This is Cut five. Play it.

[Scott Jennings]

There's a reason why congressional Democrats have like a 20% approval rating and even amongst their own party has like a 40%, the lowest Quinnipiac has ever measured. And I think last night and sort of what's been going on over the past few months is a gosh darn good illustration of that.

[Buck Sexton]

Clay. There's there's really nothing for them to point to right now that that I think is is positive for their party in a broad sense of trying to go into the midterms and the inevitable presidential campaign. I think if anything they may put themselves in a position where they're preparing to fight the last political war because all they've done now for 10 years is run against Trump unsuccessfully. In the end, I might add, right when push came to shove, Trump beat them and their whole party turned into this anti Trump. They they have to go through a metamorphosis. There is a transformation that I think Democrats will have to now it's not going to be on every I'm not Saying they're going to become a pro life party or, you know, they're not going to change that kind of stuff, but in the way they present and in the way they focus on issues and fight the media war to try to sway that middle 3 to 5% of voters, you know, which doesn't. It's funny, isn't it? That's all we're really talking about. But they're going to have to change the way that they're presented because there are a lot of people that will vote Democrat no matter what. We know that they just 75 million of them voted for Kamala. A couple a quarter of a million people voting for Democrats over Republicans in a few, in a handful at well in half a dozen states would have changed the election toward the Democrats. So it's not like we're sitting here saying the Democrats don't have a massive infrastructure and millions and millions of people who are voting for any Democratic candidate they put up. But how will they not have the same result going forward? And also how will they avoid the public repudiation that comes every time they try to present their arguments now? Well, I mean, you know, their stuff, the stuff they're saying is silly. They look silly.

[Clay Travis]

I think there are so two things that build out of that. One, they have not reached the look in the mirror and acknowledge that you have a bad mess message. And that's why people didn't vote for you, not because your message wasn't heard well enough. That's the debate that they're currently having. Second part of this, Buck, and this is where I think they're going to end up. I think they will move from Trump is Hitler. Watch how fast this happens and clip this. Save it for a couple of years in the future as we get ready for 28. This pivot's going to happen. They're going to move from Trump is Hitler to Trump is a uniquely talented politician that Republicans cannot replicate. And that's why he won in 2016 and 2024. Initially it was Russia. Then it sees Hitler. All of his supporters are racist. Buck, get ready for this. There's. Once he's out of the picture, they're going to start arguing how talented he actually was. And they're going to argue that Trumpism, the MAGA universe, does not translate to J.D. vance or whomever is seen as the successor. And they are going to struggle to produce the support that Trump did. Much like we've pointed out, Obama really didn't have very many coattails. He was a uniquely talented individual politician that was not able to bring his party that much success. They're going to start to argue that Trump is that. Get ready for it. They're going to go from Trump is Hitler, Russia's the only reason he won, to boy, he's really good at this. But it's not going to translate to the next Republican. That is, I think, the cope that they will move towards in the wake of the midterm elections when Trump is coming off the ballot.

[Buck Sexton]

Get ready for it next Wednesday. Join me online for a special videotaped interview. Starts at 11am Eastern, an hour before this show. It's a conversation with my dad that you won't want to miss. See, I grew up in New York City and my dad was a stockbroker and he made his living researching and predicting the stock market. Look, if in his line of work your predictions come true, you're a hero, right? All that is to say, next Wednesday, I'm hosting a video seminar with my dad where he's going to make a big prediction on the markets. Write this date down, March 12th at 11:00am Eastern, 8:00am on the west Coast. It'll be online in video form and super easy for you to register free of charge online. My dad created a name for himself on Wall street by his huge predictions, including back in 1987 when he called the crash nailed it on TV 11 days in advance. But he's called the crash in 2009 as well, has so many predictions too numerous to go into here. Go check it out for yourself. Sign up for the free event go to disruption2025.com that's disruption2025.com paid for by Paradigm Press.

[Unknown]

Sometimes all you can do is laugh. And they do a lot of it with the Sunday hang. Join Clay and Buck as they laugh it up in the Clay and Buck podcast feed on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Buck Sexton]

Welcome back into Clay and Buck it is. Well, I'll let caller Mike tell everybody. Caller Mike from Houston, what are you, what have you got to remind everybody of? It is quite a day on the calendar.

[Mike]

Yes. Hi. Yeah, I'm Mike. Can you hear me?

[Buck Sexton]

Yeah, everyone can.

[Mike]

Okay, perfect. Okay. So yeah, today is March 6th. It's what we call in Texas Alamo Day. It's the day the Alamo fell to Santa Anna's troops after a 13 day siege. And so I just wanted to actually, I wanted to bring up, have you guys heard of the Travis Letter?

[Clay Travis]

Oh yeah, of course. Liberty or death.

[Mike]

Yes, exactly. So I just thought for, you know, Clay's namesake, William Barrett's. William Barrett Travis's letter. Was this relevant to what you guys were talking about earlier in the week about why you're talking actually about Musk, and you were talking about what, what finally seemed to bring him over to Trump's side and his, his response to fight, fight, fight after being shot at. And it just reminded me being Texas History Week because we had Texas Independence day on Sunday, March 2nd. And, and then, of course, a few days later with the fall, the Alamo. And of course, the letter was pinned before that, but it just reminded me of, like, you know, how he addresses that letter, which, and I know you guys are history buffs, but I just.

[Buck Sexton]

Thank you. Well, look, Mike, we're at time. I appreciate you calling in, reminding us about Alamo Day. We'll remind you. Davy Crockett, my friends, a hero for all Americans. Crockett coffee dot com. Go check it out. In celebration of Alamo Day, get yourself some coffee that is delicious and that celebrates America, that shares your values. You can get a signed copy of Clay's American Playbook when you use code book when you go to the checkout and subscribe. So try Crockett Coffee today. And remember, 10 of our profits goes to Tonica Towers Foundation. Clay New York Times headline, they're trying to sell it like, Gavin News Newsom is having a big break with his party on the transgender issue. Remember, I asked the question here. I said, who could break with the Democrats? That would be the beginning of their leaving this transports thing behind. You want to tackle this? We come back.

[Clay Travis]

Let's dive into it. What did he actually say? How is it being covered and what is it telling us? We'll dive into all that more when we come back. Second hour.