Transcript
Clay Travis (0:00)
This is an iHeart podcast.
Buck Sexton (0:04)
People ask us all the time how we can save the next generation. We've got our show and the info is an antidote. But we also have a couple books coming out. Clay. That's right. And you can pre order both of them right now and be book nerds just like us. You'll laugh, you'll nod, and you'll get smarter, too. Mine's called Balls How Trump, Young Men and Sports Saved America. And mine is Manufacturing Delusion how the left Uses Brainwashing, Indoctrination and Propaganda against you. Both are great reads. One might even say they would make fabulous gifts. Indeed. So do us a solid and pre order yours on Amazon today. Welcome in Thursday edition, Clay Travis Buck Sexton show. I hope all of you are having fantastic starts to your day so far. Buck is still in Taiwan. He interviewed the president of Taiwan today. He'll play some of that for you on Monday when he is back stateside. That picture is is up. He will be back with you on Monday. I've got you for today and tomorrow solo. We got a lot to dive into. Shutdown has hit day two. I think many of you out there are relatively unimpacted and also unimpressed with the battle that is currently underway, the Schumer shutdown. We'll dive into some of those details. Stephen Miller from the White House was in Memphis, Tennessee, as the federal government is flexing resources there in a city that per capita has one of the highest murder rates in the country, to see what the impact can be there. Trust in media per Gallup has hit another record low and early feedback option for you guys. Who do you trust? I think this is a fun debate. We a fun discussion debate maybe that we could have. Throughout the course of today's program, I was looking at this poll from Gallup Media and it just came out and it's probably not a surprise that there is a massive decline in trust in media which has accelerated since COVID As many of you have become aware that you were lied to and much of what you were told about COVID was untrue. And as the Russia collusion hoax has continued, Democrats were the last people to really be trusting media. And even their trust in media has begun to collapse. And the reason they trusted media was because media told them what they wanted to hear, not because media was ever trustworthy. And now they are starting to wonder, wait a minute, why didn't we hear anything about Joe Biden's issues? Uh, why, why did they tell us that Donald Trump was Going to lose the election. And Kamala Harris was a great candidate. And then the results come in. It's different. Only 28% have any trust in media at all. And for those of you out there who wonder, okay, what would that look like? Uh, by the way, that is 28% of people have a great deal of trust in media or a fair amount of trust in media. As recently as 1980, that number was around 72 or 73%. So in the space of two generations, roughly, we have gone from substantial majorities trusting the media to almost no one trusting the media. And so a question for you guys. I'm interested in your talk backs. Who do you trust? I hope that you trust Buck and I, to be honest with you, not always to tell you exactly what you want to hear. But trust to me is different than, hey, I agree with this person on a lot of their opinions. Trust to me is, hey, I trust this guy or this gal to be honest with me about what the numbers actually show or what the facts are. Who do you trust? Uh, I'll give you some names later in the show. I'm kind of thinking through in my head who would I say this is? A person that I may or may not agree with, but I think they have enough knowledge of the factual basis underlying their opinions that I trust them not to lead me completely astray with their. With their analysis. Again, it's different than whose opinions do you trust? Because that's a function. I always like to say as an analogy, you can agree with someone's opinion, but if they tell you something as part of their factual analysis of why they have the opinion they do, you can agree with their conclusion, but you should trust them less. And I used to use a sports analogy all the time for this because I think it makes sense. If I told you Patrick Mahomes is not going to win the super bowl this year, sorry, Kansas City Chiefs fans, you might not along and say, okay, Josh Allen, maybe he's going to win this year. Maybe Lamar Jackson does. There's a lot of different. Justin Herbert, there's a lot of different guys out there in sports. You could think, hey, maybe this quarterback's going to win instead. But if I told you Patrick Mahomes not going to win the super bowl because he can't win the big game and he's never won the super bowl before, you could agree with my conclusion, but you should trust me less. Does that make sense? Sports fans are more likely to do this, I think, than, interestingly, people involved in current events and politics are so you can get to the same conclusion as someone, but because you that they're telling you something untrue. Patrick Mahomes has actually won multiple Super Bowls. So the evidence that I'm marshaling to tell you why I don't think he's going to win the super bowl this year, you might agree with my conclusion, but you should trust me less because you know that the information I'm citing to justify my opinion is incorrect. I think that's a good analogy to kind of give you a sense on trust versus conclusion. There's lots of people out there who I agree with on conclusions, but when I hear their arguments, I say, boy, I, I, I don't know that I buy this at all. And, and hey, you've totally wrecked the legitimacy of your argument by getting so many of the factual foundations that supposedly support your argument incorrect. So think about that a little bit. I'm curious what names you would give me that you trust in media as media has has tanked in terms of its trust and is now at only 28%. But I wanted to go into the shutdown, which I think is already starting to blow up in Chuck Schumer's face, because really, this isn't about the government or how it's funded at all. What you really should know is what's going on here is Chuck Schumer is terrified of the left wing of his party. And even though he knows this is a poor decision, this is about him trying to cut off some of the political support for aoc, who may well challenge him in the Democrat primary in the New York Senate race and would end his career if she decided to do that. Um, and so here is AOC on Tuesday asked directly if she's the reason that Chuck Schumer is finally decided to shut down the government. Here's cut nine. There are some people I have seen who have the following theory of why Senate Democrats have not cut a deal where they give eight votes and move along. And that is that Chuck Schumer is worried about a primary challenge from you and is worried about the politics to his left flank. And so because of that worry about a primary challenge, he's gonna shut down the government. Ergo, it is AOC's fault that the government's shutting down or that you're somehow the kind of fulcrum of this. And I wanna just ask you straight up, like, are you planning to primary challenge him? Do you think that's why he's doing this?
