Gilbert King (22:57)
Is that really a thing or is he pulling my leg? Is there like a, is there a tournament for the craziest pronunciation police? Because if so, he wins. I don't, I've that, that's not even. I've never heard that's a thing. I do think it's funny. Occasionally some of you will tell me that I, I get yelled at for either having a New York accent, too much of a New York accent, or not having any New York accent, depending on where the pronunciation police might find me in any given day. So as I am for three hours rolling through your speed traps, I, I guess I am at your mercy. So the pronunciation police came for me on that one. And since we're doing a little bit of ombudsman work here, I do want to. And of course Clay's out having a great time, sending me photos on the golf course. You know, he's, you know, big hitter, the Clay, you know, he's sending it 300 yards plus, I'm sure, one handed drinking margaritas. Here I am trying to save freedom, democracy, America, you know, as one does. And I have to return to a story that we talked about yesterday solo. So I'm here in the trench. The artillery rounds are falling all around me. I'm here in the trench and my buddy Clay is out on the golf course. The story yesterday about McDonald's, the dad, he left the kids. Now I just, before we go back to this, I want to be clear about something, all right? I want to be clear about something. The real discussion was just about how old is it reasonable and even legal, depending on the state to leave your kids unattended. And I thought that was interesting. For example, we had a call and that was why it was such a talker and so many of you were weighing in. That's why we had someone, one of our listeners from Illinois, I believe, say you got to be at least 14. See, that's high. I thought 13, which would be more or less the. If you're 13, you're allowed to be alone. You know, like you can be unsupervised by your parents legally, whether it's a good idea or not, depending on where you are. That's a separate. But it's very contextual. Right. And some of the cops who called in, not pronunciation police, but actual police. Thanks guys. They called in and they said look it really, it's about the totality of the circumstance and you know what, what's going on here and all this. Okay. So with all that said, it turns out that this fellow, Mr. Chris Lewis, who became a cause among some celebrities, a GoFundMe for him charged with deprivation of a minor a couple of weeks ago for leaving his kids, 16 and 10 years old at the restaurant. Turns out they were there for an hour and a half, which is a long time. This was not. I need to run into the office across the street for 15 minutes. I'll be right back. It was an hour and a half. That is strike one. Strike two is that. Now it is not believed that he was in fact interviewing for a job but earlier in the day had interviewed for a job. So here you go. Security footage is from New York Post captured Louis walking around the hotel at 1:30, but not around 4:30 when he allegedly left his kids at the fast food joint. Two eagle eyed customers saw the three kids inside the restaurant at 4:30pm Lewis talked to someone on the phone. Customers heard Louis say he needed to drop something off before he left the store and the unaccompanied kids for nearly 90 minutes. The customers reported the odd exchange to police. Lewis's oldest daughter told police she and her family had walked to the McDonald's from an apartment complex less than a mile down the road where her mother lived. The girl allegedly claimed her father frequently left them alone when he was watching them. 10 year old girl told officials her dad had a backpack and was supposed to deliver to their mom. Her daughter contacted Pichardo. I don't know who that. Sorry. Over social media told her to go to McDonald's. Lewis claimed he was at the apartments looking for her but never did any. During his delivery. Lewis reportedly lost his ID retracing his steps. Sheriff's office stood by the arrest asserting that Lewis was not attending a job interview at the time of his arrest and he just left his children unattended. The GoFundMe got him $75,000 in 20, 24 hours. Now, okay, so for those of you who were a little skeptical of the story, congratulations, your skepticism was correct. Now we said yesterday there's a lot of details, a lot you can go back and listen I'm not. I'm not. I'm not like doing a moonwalk here. I'm not just going. You know, we knew that there were things we didn't know, but the initial story on this was not correct. The facts were not correct, and law enforcement was correct. That's what. That's what we find out. Right. It wasn't on a job interview. Left his kids alone for an hour and a half. Leaves them alone a lot. Not safe, not good. And there you have it. So I. I wanted to return to it. I didn't want to, you know, because there was, I think, a lot of people yesterday, the way the story was presented. Oh, this guy. Hard working guy trying to do the right thing for his family. Last minute child care crisis left him in a McDonald's. Just gone for a second. A short while. Remember the. Now we can go back and look at some of the early media reporting on this, which we're relying on. I wasn't there a short while. 90 minutes is not a short while. Okay. Remember yesterday I said short while. I think that's probably. I mean, 15 to 20 minutes is a short while. Like 20 is max where you're leaving. And that would be the big problem. And Clay identified this one. I'm doing this like. Like one of those films, those JFK films where they like pull apart every aspect and every. But I think we spell. This got you all so fired up yesterday. We had so many emails, so many calls, and what was fascinating. And I love these kinds of conversations, people calling in, saying, it is. It's crazy to even consider. We had this. Some of you listening. Crazy to even consider arresting this guy for this. Not that big a deal. You know. Yeah. Other people are. This is madness. You know, these kids could have been abducted or something terrible, you know? Absolutely. So very. People had very strong feelings on both ends of this one. But those of you who are saying, yeah, I don't buy it. You were right. It's not what happened. What happened is he did something reckless and the cops were in the right and, you know, I don't know. I guess, does he. Here's a question. Does he get to keep the $75,000 for the GoFundMe? That's. I'd be wondering, you know, if he's not the. The working class hero who just did what he could and is being treated roughly by law enforcement in the moment. If that's not true, does he still. I feel like he probably does get to keep the money. I don't know. I don't know what the rules are on that, but I did just want to tell you all that we filed this up. Also want to thank our. We have an affiliate station in Augusta. And they reached out and said, hey, guys. Hey, there's more. So we knew as soon as we talked about the story on the air that there was going to be more stuff coming out. And remember, I told you I was not. I was not blaming law enforcement. I said, you know, we got to know more facts. Maybe law enforcement. It's a. It could be a situation where they have to make an arrest under the circumstances because of the age of the children and the endangerment issue. So. But quite. Quite a story. And it turns out it is a. It is a story that was rooted in. Well, it was a lie. The. The story was a lie. Also, I think the mother got called to the scene. So the mother of. Of the children, or at least one of the kids. I don't know. I have to go back and look at the details. But she was very unhappy about the situation, too. Very unhappy about this. So I would just note that here we are now updating the story a day later to make sure that we are all aligned about what happened here, understand what really happened here. And with that, I want to take my moment here to take a victory lap or something that we were right about maybe yesterday, you know, we should have waited for a little more, the facts to come in. I'll. I'll take. I'll take the heat on that. I'll take the heat on that a little bit, especially because Clay's not. Oh, is it. Isn't it so convenient Clay's not here today? I'm taking the heat. Oh, isn't that so convenient? No, he's having a great time out there. He misses all of you. But I did tell you the Eric Adams prosecution was. Was Nonsense. I did tell you the Eric Adams prosecution was. You. You don't pro. You don't threaten to throw somebody in prison for years and destroy their life because they got upgrades on an airline like, that's just not. Because this is. There is some line that the law has to draw with tangible benefit. And if it is entirely up to the discretion in the moment, for example, of somebody to give you a tangible versus intangible benefit. This came up when they went after Conrad Black, who was a excellent writer, conservative. He's sort of a little bit less, you know, scaled down, but he's sort of the Canadian Rupert Murdoch, a media mogul of sorts, but from Canada, not from Australia and conservative. And they decided to go after him. I believe it was Patrick Fitzgerald who was the prosecutor who has really just made a career going after high profile conservative political targets. And like Scooter Libby and trying to destroy them. He is a plague on the whole world of law enforcement, in my opinion. This guy Fitzgerald, very. He went to my high school, very bad news guy. And has engaged in shameful conduct of going after people at the highest levels of prosecution in. In the game because of politics. Right. I mean that. The whole Scooter Liberty thing, Libby thing was complete nonsense. He didn't leak the name. They knew he didn't leak the name. Didn't even matter about the name. Really. I know you can be very litigious or you can be very letter of the law about this, but she wasn't some like, deep, you know, deep cover operative. And oh my gosh, what's gonna. She's a blonde lady living in Georgetown. Give me a break. I was in the CIA. I know the reality. Put this aside. Oh my gosh. You blowed her cover. Yeah. She was doing Vanity Fair interviews a day later. She's so worried about all of her sources. The whole, remember the Valerie plane leak, Scooter Libby thing? Total garbage. I was in the CIA when that was going on. Total garbage. The whole prosecution was garbage. Somebody said something by accident. It was essentially a inadvertent disclosure of the name. The name. It wasn't really big, but they thought they could get Scooter Libby or really, actually they thought they could get Karl Rove or Dick Cheney. So that was. The whole thing was about. But he went after. I'm weaving. I know. Have I weaved a little too much here? Sorry. Whew. Take a moment. So going back to Conrad Black, this is where honest services fraud came into the conversation. The Supreme Court 90 had to strike down this as a criminal statute because it was so broad. And Scalia made this point that you could have. If the CEO of a company got a great table at a restaurant, he make the case. Well, he only got that table because he's the CEO of, you know, Johnson and Johnson or whatever. And so he's not. And if they have any business with that restaurant chain, he's not being fair to the. To the shareholders. I know that sounds crazy. It is crazy. Which is why it was struck down 9 0. But they actually prosecuted people on that. Mayor Adams, sort of similar stuff here. And the corruption charges against him were dismissed with prejudice. Dismissed with prejudice. And the judge is like, not only should this not have happened. The fact that it happened is gross and wrong. Here's Mayor Adams taking a victory lap on this play. Cut 19.