Hour 2 - Julie Hamill Speaks Out for Females

Summary

Summary of "Hour 2 - Julie Hamill Speaks Out for Females"

Podcast Information:

• Title: The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
• Host/Author: iHeartPodcasts
• Episode: Hour 2 - Julie Hamill Speaks Out for Females
• Release Date: June 2, 2025

---

Introduction

In the second hour of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, hosts Clay Travis and Buck Sexton engage in a compelling discussion with Julie Hamill, an attorney and president of the California Justice Center. The conversation centers around the contentious topic of Title IX, gender identity in sports, and the legal and societal implications of recent legislation.

---

1. Understanding Title IX and Its Traditional Applications

[03:59] Julie Hamill: "Title IX has been a federal statute since 1972, providing sex-based protections to prevent discrimination against girls and women in educational programs, including sports."

Julie elucidates the original intent of Title IX, emphasizing its role in ensuring equal opportunities for female athletes and students in educational settings.

---

2. California's AB 1266 and Its Impact on Title IX

[04:45] Julie Hamill: "California passed AB 1266 in 2013, now education code section 221.5 F, mandating that schools allow students to use facilities and teams that align with their gender identity rather than their biological sex."

This legislation represents a significant shift, as it reinterprets Title IX to prioritize gender identity over biological sex, thereby allowing biological males to compete in female sports categories.

---

3. Legal Challenges and Federal Reactions

[06:56] Julie Hamill: "Title IX is sex-based and should not include gender identity. The federal courts have enjoined Biden's 2024 Title IX rule, stating it conflicts with the statute's original intent."

Julie discusses ongoing legal battles, highlighting how recent federal court decisions have challenged interpretations that expand Title IX to include gender identity, labeling such changes as contrary to the law's foundational purpose.

---

4. Consequences of Redefining Gender in Law

[07:52] Julie Hamill: "Gender identity is legally codified in California, redefining traditional sex-based categories and creating loopholes that undermine the original protections Title IX was meant to provide."

The conversation delves into the broader implications of redefining gender legally, raising concerns about fairness in sports and the potential erosion of protections for biological females.

---

5. Public Opinion and Polling Insights

[10:20] Julie Hamill: "There's a pressing need for federal legislation to clarify that Title IX is strictly sex-based. Without this, leftist interpretations could prevail, allowing males in female spaces and sports."

Julie emphasizes the disconnect between legislation and public sentiment, advocating for congressional action to reaffirm the sex-based parameters of Title IX amidst growing debates on gender identity.

---

6. Impact on Children and Educational Institutions

[14:49] Julie Hamill: "Children are being exposed to gender identity concepts at an early age. For instance, fifth-grade teachers are reading books like 'Too Bright to See,' which unequivocally state that a trans woman is a woman, labeling any dissent as bigotry."

The discussion highlights concerns about the influence of gender identity education on young children, questioning the appropriateness and psychological impact of such materials in educational settings.

---

7. Proposed Solutions and Legislative Actions

[12:40] Julie Hamill: "Organizations like the Defense of Freedom Institute have proposed model legislation, such as the Protect Title 9 Act, to reinforce the sex-based definitions and protect women's sports."

Julie outlines potential legislative measures aimed at counteracting current trends, advocating for clear legal definitions to safeguard Title IX's original intent.

---

8. Future Outlook and Supreme Court Involvement

[13:09] Julie Hamill: "We urgently need a Supreme Court ruling to clarify that men and women are legally distinct categories under Title IX, ensuring the protection of women's rights in sports and other areas."

Looking ahead, Julie expresses the necessity for judicial intervention to resolve ambiguities surrounding gender identity and sex-based protections, suggesting that Supreme Court involvement is crucial for definitive guidance.

---

Notable Quotes with Attribution:

• Julie Hamill on Title IX's Original Intent:

  • "[Title IX] is sex-based protections... You cannot discriminate against girls and women in educational programs, including sports." [03:59]

• On California's AB 1266:

  • "Students must use facilities and play on teams that align with their gender identity instead of their sex." [04:45]

• Regarding Legal Codification of Gender Identity:

  • "California has legislated gender ideology into statute, which is so absolutely nuts." [08:13]

• On the Necessity for Federal Clarification:

  • "We need a federal statute to clarify Title IX is sex-based, which does not include gender identity." [10:20]

• Impact on Children:

  • "Fifth-grade teachers are reading a book that says a trans woman is a woman, full stop." [14:49]

---

Conclusion

The conversation with Julie Hamill underscores the complex and divisive nature of redefining gender within the framework of Title IX. It highlights the tension between evolving societal understandings of gender identity and the legal protections originally established to ensure equality for women and girls in educational and athletic programs. The discussion calls for immediate legislative and judicial actions to address and clarify these issues, emphasizing the protection of Title IX's foundational principles.

---

Additional Context:

Throughout the episode, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton facilitate a nuanced dialogue, balancing legal analysis with societal implications. They probe Julie Hamill's perspectives, challenging the intersections of gender identity, legal statutes, and the impact on female athletes. The conversation reflects broader national debates on gender, legality, and the future of educational policies.

Transcript

[Unknown Host]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Jack Armstrong]

Hello, it is Ryan. And we could all use an extra bright spot in our day, couldn't we? Just to make up for things like sitting in traffic, doing the dishes, counting your steps, you know, all the mundane stuff. That is why I'm such a big fan of Chumba Casino. Chumba Casino has all your favorite social casino style games that you can play for free, anytime, anywhere with daily bonuses. So sign up [e-mail] that's chumbacasino.com no purchase necessary vgw group void web prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions.

[Unknown Speaker]

Apply Made in America means something to us. When you invest 700 billion annually in American companies and the 13 million workers and families they support, you're investing in the success of Main Street. That's money powering growth in manufacturing, tech, energy and innovation. And it starts with private equity backing American ambition. Learn how private equity keeps American businesses [e-mail] paid for by the American Investment Council.

[Joe Getty]

The Medal of Honor is the highest military decoration in the United States. Recipients have done the improbable, the unexpected, showing immense bravery and sacrifice in the name of something much bigger than themselves.

[Unknown Host]

This medal is for the men who went down that day On Medal of.

[Joe Getty]

Honor Stories of Courage. You'll hear about these heroes and what their stories tell us about the nature of bravery. Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast.

[Jack Armstrong]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand? We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and tedious and depressing and makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Unknown Host]

He's Joe Getty.

[Jack Armstrong]

We're Armstrong and Getty. We try to bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Unknown Host]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Jack Armstrong]

We have a win.

[Unknown Host]

Yes.

[Jack Armstrong]

Listen to Armstrong. You geti on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown Host]

Every day, local businesses open their doors with more than just a plan. They bring persistence, ambition, and a vision for what's next. And America's banks bring the tools and strategic guidance to get there. From storefronts on Main street to warehouse floors, businesses are leading the way with support from banks. Banks are providing what it takes for businesses to operate today and plan for tomorrow. Building opportunity, fueling economic growth. Paid for by United for a Strong Economy. Hey, Buck. One of my kids called me an unk the other day. An unk. Yep. Slang, evidently. For not being hip, being an old dude. So how do we un unk you? Get more people to subscribe to our YouTube channel. At least that's what my kids tell me. That's simple enough. Just search the Clay, Travis and Buck Sexton show and hit the subscribe button. Takes less than five seconds to help un me. Do it for Clay, do it for freedom and get great content while you're there. The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton show YouTube Channel. Second hour of playing Buck kicks off now and we played the highlight reel for you a few minutes ago. If you missed it, go back the first hour playing Buck on the podcast. You'll definitely want to hear it. Julie Hamill, attorney and president of the California justice center, joins us now. Julie, appreciate you making the time.

[Julie Hamill]

Thank you so much for having me.

[Unknown Host]

Now, first off, before we get into the exchange you had on cnn, which we did, I don't know if you know, or if you were able to listen in before, but we did play a good more than half of it, I'd say on the air. I watched it and it was just, it was astonishing. But also I guess I expect it. So we'll get to that in a second. But can you just from the legal perspective, tell everybody we know this story about A.B. hernandez, biological male, competing against women. We know this stuff. What is the legal what is legally at issue here? How does Title 9 come into play? What is Gavin Newsom of California doing? What's happening on the legal front?

[Julie Hamill]

Well, long story short, Title 9 has been a federal statute since 1972, and it's very simple. It is sex based protections for you cannot discriminate against girls and women in educational programs, including sports. And so there is supposed to be equal opportunity for women and girls in educational programs, including sports. California back in 2013 passed this law, AB 1266, which is now education code section 221.5 F that says schools must allow students to use the facilities and play on a sports team that aligns with their gender identity instead of instead of sex. So that essentially turns Title IX on its head. And we've had that in place for over a decade in California. Now it mirrors almost identically Biden's Title 9 Title IX rule that he put in place in 2024 that was enjoined by a number of federal district courts. So those courts said in their decisions, you cannot create a regulation or a rule that completely flies in the face of what the statute says. This completely subverts Title ix. It does the opposite of what Title IX was supposed to do by allowing males into the female spaces, into female sports, into female academic programs. It's total nonsense. Any thinking sane human being can recognize it immediately, which is why I'm frankly shocked that this interview is getting so much attention. Because it was simply. It's just common sense. I was only saying things that most of America is thinking. And that is.

[Unknown Host]

Well, yeah, it went, it went super viral, I think, for the reason that. And I'm glad that it did, Julie, over the weekend, because you are just, you are just saying in a very calm tone, and everyone heard it, we played it. Here's the reality. And the CNN anchor has this almost like otherworldly, detached. But what about people who are assigned female at birth, who uses this kind of language? Like, you know, we just had Mother's Day recently. You know, this is like the Birthing People's Day phenomenon that we've heard. Like, no normal person thinks that this should be normal. And let me ask you this. Taking California's policy to its logical conclusion. Let's say I was an employee in the state of California and I wanted to claim discrimination as a woman because I say that I identify as a woman. On what grounds could California tell me that I couldn't sue for sex based discrimination against me as a woman? Like how, how is it legally codified what you identify as?

[Julie Hamill]

It is actually legally codified. It's freaking nonsense. So we, in addition to AB 1266, we also have the Unruh Civil Rights act, which defines discrimination based on gender identity as a violation of California civil rights law. So it's not just in schools, it's not just adults, it's not just children, it's also adults. And California has literally legislated gender ideology into statute, which is so absolutely nuts. I don't think people really understand the consequences of what has been done here.

[Unknown Host]

Well, then take me through this because, yeah, that is so nuts. I didn't even know that they had done that. How, how do you qualify as identifying as a different gender? What has to be done? Because it can't be sex change operation, because that's actually only, you know, a pretty small percentage of these individuals.

[Julie Hamill]

It's a feeling. It's a feeling. Do you feel like a woman today? You're a woman. That's.

[Unknown Host]

So then I'm right. So then I could, I could say I feel like a woman. I can't believe I'm saying this out loud. And I think I'm being discriminated against in my California job as a woman and I'm suing and they would have to try to prove that I'm not actually a woman.

[Julie Hamill]

Yes. Yeah, that's absolute bonkers nonsense.

[Unknown Host]

I, you know, I said, what is now the next step on this, right? Because I think the sit down that you had or the conversation you had on CNN was very illuminating. I mean, also just things like we need more study to see if biological males have a, an advantage in sports. This is, this is like members of the Communist Party or maybe even just like everyday people within the Soviet Union saying, yes, we're all starving, but the grain harvest this year was the best grain harvest in history. Like, this is that level of crazy? Because we all know that obviously the basis of men and women having segregated sports is that it wouldn't be fair if they didn't. Right. That's. Otherwise we would just have, you know, men and women, right, can apply to work in an investment bank. We don't have the men, the men position, the women position. It's different in sports because of the physical differences. So are you, are you going to bring suit? Is this going to get up to appeals? Is this going to go to scotus? Like, what happens now?

[Julie Hamill]

So there are lawsuits pending right now. The Advocates for Faith and Freedom group out of San Diego filed a lawsuit that is pending in the Central District right now. Our U.S. attorney, Bill Aseli has filed a statement of interest. And so the government is getting involved in that one that is challenging AB 1266. I hope it goes to SCOTUS in the meantime, though, the Trump administration is very much motivated and acting very quickly here, and they are coming in with the full weight of the Department of Justice. And I believe that we will see results soon, hopefully.

[Unknown Host]

Well, what do you think about the, the polling? Because this came up in your conversation. Let's, you know, what do you think about the pulling of federal funds if California does not comply with Title 9 rooted in an understanding of gender as a thing that is real, or rather men and women are things that are different and distinguishable under law.

[Julie Hamill]

Well, this is so crazy to me that the anchor with a straight face said to me that there are different interpretations of Title ix, that there are people who believe that gender identity is the thing that should be protected and not sex. So for that reason, we need to legislate this at the congressional level. We need a federal state statute to clarify that Title 9 is sex based, which does not include gender identity. It is your biological sex. The fact that we have to do that is absolutely. It's terrifying to me. We've reached Orwellian levels of insanity in this country. But in order to protect future generations, we have to have this spelled out in statute. Because as soon as we don't have a Republican administration going to have this crazy leftist interpretation of Title IX again, and they're going to allow males to compete against girls, share facilities with girls, and there's nothing we can really do about it. So how. It's just.

[Unknown Host]

See, my problem with this is I still come back to. If they say that, and as you pointed out, that in California there is a gender identity protection law, how can you legally. Law. You know, if somebody said, buck, how can you lawfully or legally identify a man or woman? I'm like, well, we know what a man is, we know what a woman is, right? It's like, you sit there, you go, that's a man, that's a woman. How could you identify, or rather, how could you codify gender identity without it excluding people who claim to be covered under gender identity? Or rather without it being so vague that it could be anything?

[Julie Hamill]

Well, the people at dfi, the Defense of Freedom Institute, have actually proposed model legislation for this. It's like the Protect Title 9 Act. You can go to their website and it's there. And they've done that. And they. And Bill Asale, when he was in our state legislature, right before he got appointed to the U.S. attorney position, also introduced a bill called AB844, which would have done the same thing.

[Unknown Host]

But that's defining men and women in law, right?

[Julie Hamill]

Yes.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah. No, but what I'm saying is, how could you define gender identity in law? Because it isn't a thing.

[Julie Hamill]

It's defined in various places in California statute. It's not consistent. It's always something different. And then if you look at school district policies, these different school districts throughout California have also taken a stab at trying to define it. But it's a nebulous concept that is ever changing. It's not immutable. It's not going to be protected by the Supreme Court in equal protection cases because it's not an immutable characteristic like sexual. You cannot change your sex.

[Unknown Host]

Yes. So do you think this is. To me, it feels like this just has to go to the Supreme Court and there has to be some clarifying. It's amazing clarifying ruling from the Supreme Court that men and women are different and we can know the difference. Why?

[Julie Hamill]

Why do we have to do this? Why can we not have people come to their senses and start speaking rationally and having.

[Unknown Host]

It feels like Democrats because you're asking a very important question, but it feels like Democrats to what you said before. They're just trying to ride this thing out until they're in power again and then it's going to be the lunacy of, yeah, this is the, you know, men and women's locker rooms, men against women on the sports field, you know, men and women's prisons.

[Julie Hamill]

Well, and the really Orwellian part about it is that they're saying men are women, they are women, they're not men.

[Unknown Host]

Right.

[Julie Hamill]

Of course they're actually women now because they say they are. These are women. And you must accept that. And if you don't accept that, you're a bigot.

[Unknown Host]

Well, have you ever seen. This is what I always tell everybody is the, is the true ultimate ends of this. There have been a few people who have tried this. You see like blogs or, you know, stuff on like HuffPo or the Nation or some of those, you know, communist loony bins online where they try to make the case that if you're a straight man who is not attracted to trans women, you're bigoted. Have you ever seen that? That, that bubbles up here and there. And as I point out to everybody, based on what you just said, which is that the real belief is that trans women are women indistinguishable from women. The ultimate logic of this is there's a problem with guys who aren't attracted to trans women.

[Julie Hamill]

Yeah, it's okay. One of the most disturbing elements here is, is what they're doing to children. I'm laughing right now, but it's really dark. It's actually incredibly dark. And I'm on a school board out here in Palos Verdes and we had this book that we have fifth grade teachers like, these are ten year old kids. They're being read a book called Too Bright to See, which says, it literally says in the book, a trans woman is a woman, full stop. And anything else is bigotry. And it's. That is what they're teaching little kids. It's all.

[Unknown Host]

They are teaching kids the sky is green. They are teaching kids can see. They look at the sky, it's blue. And there are books that say the sky is green. And we're supposed to accept that.

[Julie Hamill]

Yes, this is 1984 come to life.

[Unknown Host]

It is great. Well, Julie, appreciate your, the work you're doing on this. What's your organization? So if anyone wants to go help donate any of that stuff.

[Julie Hamill]

So I am the president of the California Justice Center. We are supported by the California Policy center, which is a nonprofit organization. If you want to donate and support my work, that is where to go. You can find my handle on Twitter at Hamill H A M I L Law.

[Unknown Host]

Well, great work keeping your cool and keeping it calm and collected while, you know, while one of the commissars was trying to go through the talking points on cnn. Appreciate you making the time for us.

[Julie Hamill]

Thank you so much.

[Unknown Host]

Look, let's talk about gold for a second here. I believe in taking the long term view and that's the best way to achieve financial security, to make smart decisions. And gold has been part of my long term plan for a long time and that's why it's worked so well. I go back now, I think I got my first gold coin maybe 15 years ago and I've been building up my gold reserves ever since and it's been a smart move. And this is one of these things. You know, a lot, a lot of conservatives, we talk about gold and we've been pushing gold for years. And if you look, gold's done really, really well. The gold that I bought years ago has gone up tremendously in value and gold continues to go up in value. So this is just a smart idea for the long term financial play to hedge against inflation, which we could experience a little bit of a bump in that this summer. But also the only way forward with the debt that we have is going to be more printing, more printing, more printing, which means dollars will go down in value. Gold, my friends, gold is the store of value still to this day and all throughout history. With the national debt we have, there is no way forward realistically other than the continued printing of dollars. And that means the money that you have in your bank account is going to be worth less. Diversifying a portion of your savings into gold so you can get that upside and get that protection. Makes sense. Text my name Buck to 989898 Birch Gold Group will send you a free no obligation info kit on gold. Learn how to hold gold and silver in a tax sheltered account. Birch Gold will help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into a gold IRA for no money out of pocket. Again, text my name Buck to 989898 that's B U C K. Text Buck to 989898 Birch Gold has an A plus rating from the Better Business Bureau. Go to birchgold.com buck.

[Joe Getty]

The medal of Honor is the highest military decoration in the United States. Recipients have done the improbable, showing immense bravery and sacrifice in the name of something much bigger than themselves.

[Unknown Host]

This medal is for the men who went down that day. It's for the families of those who didn't make it.

[Joe Getty]

I'm J.R. martinez. I'm a U.S. army veteran myself, and I'm honored to tell you the stories of these heroes on the new season of Medal of Stories of Courage from Pushkin Industries and I Heart podcast from Robert Blake, the first black sailor to be awarded the medal to Daniel Daly, one of only 19 people to have received the Medal of Honor to twice. These are stories about people who have distinguished themselves by acts of valor going above and beyond the call of duty. You'll hear about what they did, what it meant, and what their stories tell us about the nature of courage and sacrifice. Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast.

[Jack Armstrong]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand? We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and tedious and depressing and makes you ang you don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Unknown Host]

He's Joe Getty.

[Jack Armstrong]

We're Armstrong and Getty. We try to bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Unknown Host]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Jack Armstrong]

We have a winner.

[Unknown Host]

Yes.

[Jack Armstrong]

Listen to Armstrong. You get it on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Leon Neyfakh]

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency.

[Jack Armstrong]

Did you make a mistake in sending arms to Tehran, sir?

[Unknown Host]

No.

[Leon Neyfakh]

It became known as the Iran Contra.

[Unknown Host]

Affair and I'm not taking any more questions. In just a second I'm going to ask.

[Leon Neyfakh]

I'm Leon Nayfak, co creator of Slow Burn. In my podcast, Iran Contra, you'll hear all the unbelievable details of a scandal that captivated the nation nearly 40 years ago, but which few of us still remember today.

[Unknown Host]

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane I can't begin to tell you. Please do.

[Leon Neyfakh]

To hear the whole story. Listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown Host]

Welcome back into Play and Vox. Yeah, we're just talking about this story out of California a second ago with the person who just won the track and field championship is a biological male and it's pretty remarkable a Democrats plan to stay on this issue and have not budged at all. It really gives you a sense as to how clear it is that this is really important to them. They view this as the new civil rights struggle. The Democrats really, as a party, they're attached to this. And one of the ways I tried to say this back on my Bill Maher appearance in October, I think I got talked over a little bit. But I was trying to say, even for the Democrats who know this is crazy and there are Democrats I've spoken to Democrats who know this stuff is nuts, particularly else in my case, I've spoken to a number of offline, you know, not, not in public, but a number of black Democrats who do not agree with the trans agenda stuff, but they don't want to deal with the heat. I know people who are prominent in Democrats, you know, prominent Democrat commentators and, and they don't want to, you know, they don't want to deal with it. It's not that they agree with it, but they don't want to deal with the heat that they get from this one. And you'll. I think there's a lot of Democrats who fall into that category. They won't publicly go against this even if they're not on board. So whether it's a Chuck Schumer type or go down the list, they will not say, yeah, this is crazy, which tells you all you need to know. If it was damaging to their party and they disagreed with it, wouldn't they be willing to say, I don't think we should do this anymore. VIP email from David. He says maybe the state should try this, have a boys, girls and open classification. Trans female will compete with the girls, except they will be reward, awarded a medal in the open division. Girls will receive awards for placing events in the girls division. So everyone competes, but the rewards are divided into classifications. That is, David, that's not a bad idea. You know, it's an option. I would just say, I think that the trans individuals, because it's always, it's always guys pretending to be girls. A girl pretends to be a guy is going to get no attention to this because all the guys are going to completely smoker in all these athletic events. So they don't want to do a third event with other trans people. They want the glory of I'm the state champion. And they convince themselves that that's okay, that that's the problem is they want us to all go along with the delusion. You never know when you're going to be able to or when you're going to need to Be able to protect yourself and having the right tools is critical. And that's what you get from our sponsor Sabre. I just distributed some Sabre products to my in laws over the weekend. They know that it's important to have self defense tools with you at all times. Saber's the number one pepper spray brand trusted by law enforcement. S A B R E. That's S A B R E. Radio.com is the website. Sabre radio.com their pepper gel projectile launcher, shaped like a pistol or a rifle depending on the model, fires off a pepper gel projectile and it wards off potential threats. Both of our wives, Clays and mine like having these non lethal self defense options. Sabre has a whole suite of them and they are top quality. And this is a family owned company that's been doing this for 50 years. Products are reliable and trusted. Go check out what they've got. Go to saberradio.com you'll save 15% there. That's saberradio.com or call 844-824 safe 844-824 safe. We are gonna take a moment here. I'm just gonna, I'm gonna talk you through this. This was really interesting over the weekend, this drone attack in Ukraine that got a lot of headlines. Now keep in mind right now there is a negotiation that is happening or at least there's, you know, the beginnings of negotiations underway between Russia and Ukraine. So they're going into peace talks and it comes right in the aftermath of this, this strike. And here's what, here's what we know so far. There's a, there's a lot of footage and video of it because they, the drones relayed back in real time what they were doing. So you have footage of these attacks that are now, that have been circulated. And they were hitting, they were hitting these planes on the, these Russian planes on the tarmac. Here's what we know. So Ukraine got 117 drones, aerial drones into trucks. And the trucks were Russian. And they somehow contracted with these trucks, contracted with these trucks to go to the perimeter of four Russian air bases. One of them was in Siberia. I mean this is way far, this is a couple, this is thousands of miles from the actual Ukraine border. So way deep inside Russia they got these drones to be on these trucks and then the drones activated. They obviously had them on a remote control setup. The drones activated and were able to, to attack 40 Russian strategic bomber aircraft, which is about a little more than a third of Russia's strategic cruise missile carriers. The estimated cost of this to Russia is $7 billion. Okay. And, you know, we've got a much bigger military budget than Russia. We've got much more in the way of these kinds of strategic assets that we could. Well, we wouldn't want to have to rebuild them, but, you know, we. We have much better resourcing than they do. So you can imagine $7 billion of Russian military hardware that hurts. People have been talking about this as the pager. Remember the Hezbollah Mossad pager operation, where the pagers blew up in the hands of, or on the waists, really, of these Hezbollah operatives, because they managed to get into their supply chain. And it was, as you know, I mean, I spent some time in the CIA and was aware of some pretty. Pretty remarkable CIA operations. A lot of the really good ones have been. Are public, and they've even made movies about some of them. But, you know, the CIA has done some pretty cool stuff in the past, or I should say impressive stuff. That pager operation by the Israelis is the stuff of intelligence, espionage, legend. This. This drone attack was. I'm just talking tactically impressive. All right. Whether you're worried about this, some kind of escalation or anything else, that's another part of the conversation. But this comes after Russia has been really escalating its military strikes on particular. I'm sorry, it strikes particularly on civilians, not on military targets. Russia has been just blowing up a lot, a lot of civilians while we're supposed to get this opening for a ceasefire. Really, that's what you need first, right? Ceasefire means the guns are silent and at least you're not taking active casualties. And then you can continue to hammer out what a. What a meaningful end of the conflict would be. You know, what. What a. You know, a treaty, or mistis, whatever it's going to be, however you end it, you can figure it out. But first, you want to get to a ceasefire so you're not losing people. There's not bloodshed unnecessarily. But Trump has been very clear. He is deeply unhappy with Putin's response to the efforts to get him into a conversation here about ending this war. And this is something that I was concerned about. Look, everyone's concerned about it. It's not easy. What Trump is trying to do here, what he's trying to accomplish would be an incredible win. But it's certainly worth trying, because the alternative is that you have people dying in large numbers on the front between Russia and Ukraine, to our side of things. And I try to be very clear. There's Ukrainian and Russian interests here, and there's American interests, which I am primarily concerned with. And I wish that there was no fighting going on over there, just like I wish there was no fighting going on between Israel and Hamas. And I wish there was no fighting and ethnic cleansing going on in Sudan. And, you know, this is. But we live in a nasty world, as you know, and there's no way to just snap your fingers and make these things go away. And you can't just let the bad guys go without any response. So on our side of things, though, with Russia, Ukraine, we are funding this. And yes, I know that there's the argument that's being made that we are. And this, I'm uncomfortable with this. This argument on a number of. In a number of ways that we are bleeding Russia so that we won't have to fight them. I don't think that we have to worry about fighting Russia. Russia militarily is nowhere near what it would need to be to pose a threat to U.S. interests. I know, other than the nuclear arsenal. But we're. Russia's not looking to create a nuclear holocaust of the entire planet. I'm pretty confident in that. We are working on now, thanks to Trump, the golden dome system, which I think will give us even more peace of mind. That's, to me, more for Iran, North Korea, you know, rogue state actors, where it's not just the possibility that they may get crazy enough that they want to launch, which is there. The more you. I'll tell you this, the more you read about North Korea, I've learned a fair bit. I mean, I'm. Because I find it fascinating. It's a little bit, though North Korea is terrifying to the point where, like, you need to go. If you really read up on it and I mean, you get into the history of it and what, what it's like there, you got to go for a walk in the sunshine afterwards, because it will. You kind of feel in your soul, how could this be happening today? Today in the world? How could a place be so horrific and so crazy and such a vile tyranny? But so, yeah, the more you learn about North Korea, the more you think to yourself, well, maybe they're crazy enough to fire off a missile, but there's also the possibility that they could just lose control of the stockpile to some faction within. That's. That's even crazier. This is always the concern. And, you know, I would say if anyone is going to be able to bring about a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, I think Trump is in the likeliest position. But this was always going to be a tough ask. I know Trump said I would end it, you know, day one or whatever. And that's Trump in, in the role as salesman of, look, I am the best guy for this, so let me do what I need to do and we'll get there. You know, maybe a little bit of overpromising on the timeline, but that doesn't mean that Trump isn't the best guy to try to get it done. There is the possibility, and I thought this all along, that there is no ceasefire to be had because Putin thinks he's winning and there's reason for him to believe that. And he doesn't care about the casualties that he's incurring because he doesn't have to face a real election. And he thinks that this is more in the long term strategic interest of Russia to pursue. And maybe he views himself, I think there's plenty of reason to think that he views himself in the mold of a, you know, whether it's a Stalin or a Peter the Great or one of the, one of the still very celebrated leaders, Soviet or Russian leaders of the past, who were very expansionist in their, in their ideas. Right. And what they were able to accomplish. I actually read a. I have it here. Yeah, it's, it's Ivan the Terrible by Payne and Romanoff. I told you about North Korea. Same thing with, with reading about Ivan the Terrible. You will need to go for a walk in the sunshine if you, if you read about how crazy that guy was, really. I mean, truly sadistic in a way that is demonic. And, you know, was, was leader. Leader of, of Russia. I mean, not. Wasn't really Russia. It was kind of like, he's a prince of Moscow. It's a little different, but still. And somebody that is thought of, I think, very clearly. In fact, you could make it. You can draw a pretty straight line between a lot of the Stalinist approach to dissent and to totalitarianism and Ivan the Terrible setting up a really, the, the original totalitarian secret police known as the op. Niki and I write about this in my book, which is probably why I'm immediately going into this. Operechniki were a fascinating group. Horrible. They dressed in all black, they had severed dogs, heads that they would have tied to their saddle just so everybody knew what they were really about. And they had complete extrajudicial detention, torture and execution authority. Anybody they wanted to kill who was in the way of the, of the, the czar that he didn't like or that they didn't like. You Know, as long as it didn't make the czar angry, didn't matter. And Stalin, I think, figured out that this was a very effective way because Ivan the Terrible stayed in power for a long time and managed to get. Get quite. Get quite far, actually did pretty well militarily against some of the enemies in the region. Anyway, sorry, I'm weaving a little too much there. Back to Russia, Ukraine. So this is why you got to get the book, so you can learn, learn more about the operation. Nikki. Scary guys and the fact that they had dogs heads on their saddles, man, that's an. If you want to show that somebody's an evil, you know, son of a gun, dog head on the saddle is like a very good place to start. You know, that's. That's. I'm like, still angry. That was 500 years ago. I'm still angry about it. So I think that there's a chance that we'll get some kind of a ceasefire in Russia, Ukraine, but I'm not counting on it. Trump is annoyed. But back to American interests here, back to what the US Is hoping to get out of this. We don't want to continue to fund this forever, and we certainly don't want to put our own people in harm's way and suffer the possible loss of American soldiers fighting in a country that ultimately, whether it stays under Russian Federation control, or rather whether it stays under Ukrainian or Russian Federation control, does not matter that much to us. That is the harsh reality of doesn't matter enough that we're willing to die for it. Doesn't matter enough that I would want any of you listening or any of your children or grandchildren to go fight for it. So we have that in mind with all of this, right? This is something that we have to understand that that is the red line. Not a single American on behalf of the armed forces, our armed forces dying over there to figure out where the final lines on the map will be drawn. But, yes, it was an impressive strike by Ukraine inside of drones. It also is a window, I think, into the future of warfare, which is just going to be increasingly, I think that we reached, in a sense, the. A pinnacle of commando warfare. And I mean that Special operations, J Socks, seals, Delta Rangers, marsoc, all that. We reached a pinnacle of that in the war on terror because it was largely counterinsurgency operations. It was targeted strikes against individuals. You know, it was. It was gunning it out muzzle to muzzle with the bad guys. The wars of the future, I think, are going to increasingly rely on those Obviously special operations always have a very important role, precision instrument that needs to be used the way it was intended to be used. But you're going to see a lot more of just tech, drones, AI. And everybody sees this happening and who controls the skies is going to be a combination of who has the best autonomous tech, the best AI, the best overall drone systems and the manufacturing of them. Another reason why manufacturing capacity is going to be so important here because if China can put 10,000 drones a month in the sky and we can only put, you know, a thousand, even if ours are better, that's a big problem. So this is where I think the future, and I believe everyone sees this, the future of warfare is going and you're, you're seeing a, a picture into it. Remember the, the Boer War in South Africa, South Africa discussion now, but the Boer War in South Africa, the origin of the term concentration camp and also was actually an early version of the trench warfare we saw in the first World War. You really got a sneak peek of what the first World war was going to turn into with the trench warfare based on the Boer War. We are getting a sneak peek of what nation state warfare in the future is going to be between with this look at Russia, Ukraine. But it could be of course between the US and China. And that's the big thing that we're looking at here. The official start to hurricane season has arrived. And you know what that means. More rain and more debris in your gutters. When your gutters are clogged that will lead to costly damage to your home. You don't want the mess or the expense. Protect your home with Leaffilter, America's one gutter and gutter protection company. Right now you can save up to 30% off your entire order. Go to leaffilter.com buck and get started. Leaffilter's trusted pros will clean out, realign and seal your gutters before installing leaffilters. Award winning and patented technology trusted by over 1 million homeowners. Schedule your free inspection and get up to 30% off your entire [e-mail] Buck. That's leaffilter.com Buck. See your representative for warranty details.

[Joe Getty]

The Medal of Honor is the highest military decoration in the United States. Recipients have done the improbable, showing immense bravery and sacrifice in the name of something much bigger than themselves.

[Unknown Host]

This medal is for the men who went down that day. It's for the families of those who didn't make it.

[Joe Getty]

I'm J.R. martinez. I'm a U.S. army veteran myself, and I'm honored to tell you the stories of these heroes on the new season of Medal of Stories of Courage from Pushkin Industries and I Heart podcast podcast from Robert Blake, the first black sailor to be awarded the medal, to Daniel Daly, one of only 19 people to have received the Medal of Honor twice. These are stories about people who have distinguished themselves by acts of valor going above and beyond the call of duty. You'll hear about what they did, what it meant, and what their stories tell us about the nature of courage and sacrifice. Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast.

[Jack Armstrong]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand? We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and tedious and depressing and makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Unknown Host]

He's Joe Getty.

[Jack Armstrong]

We're Armstrong and Getty. We try to bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy.

[Unknown Host]

Modern world about something about a comedian tone.

[Jack Armstrong]

We have a winner.

[Unknown Host]

Yes.

[Jack Armstrong]

Listen to Armstrong and Yeti on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Leon Neyfakh]

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency.

[Jack Armstrong]

Did you make a mistake in sending arms to Tehran, sir?

[Unknown Host]

No.

[Leon Neyfakh]

No one was letting it became known as the Iran Contra affair.

[Unknown Host]

And I'm not taking any more questions. In just a second, I'm going to ask.

[Leon Neyfakh]

I'm Leon Naifak, co creator of Slow Burn. In my podcast, Iran Contra, you'll hear all the unbelievable details of a scandal that captivated the nation nearly 40 years ago, but which few of us still remember today.

[Unknown Host]

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane, I can't begin to tell you. Please do.

[Leon Neyfakh]

To hear the whole story. Listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown Host]

We're gonna be joined here in just a few minutes by Oklahoma Senator Mark Wayne Mullen. We're going to talk to him about the big beautiful bill. It is big and it's beautiful and it is a bill. We will talk to him about what's going on there and also some other things. Very interesting guy, interesting background. He is. Was an MMA fighter. Husband and father of six. Wow. He's got some. So he can give us. He can give you some tips on how to defend yourself in a street fight. And you Know dad stuff, because six kids, man, that is, that is, that's. That's the, that's the pro level right there. You know, one kid is challenging enough, but six kids, good for him. Let's get to some of our talkbacks. You remember, talkbacks are on the iHeart app. It's great. You just go to the Clay and Buck page. Make sure you subscribe to Clay and Buck podcast network, and you can send us a message by pressing a little microphone. AA podcast listener, Patty with a chalk back, hit it. The rational response to the emotional debate put forth by these parents of transgender athletes is what about the emotional stress and strain put on the female athletes because they have spent years and years perfecting their sport, becoming the best they can be, only to have it all taken away by some dude with emotional problems. They need to deal with their own child's emotional stress without causing more stress to other athletes. Perfectly said, Patty. Completely agree. Articulate. Excellent. Right to the point. A plus on the talk back. And I'm glad everybody heard it because I think you're completely correct. You know, the be kind to the trans athlete ignores the. How about be kind to the girls, the women? You know, it's like, you know, girls, women. I mean, I think you're 17, 18. We start saying woman, but you get what I mean. I mean, they're high school girls. How about into the girls who are involved in the athletic competition? And how about be kind to them by not having them change next to a guy who's got male genitals? That's a little. That's a little off putting, right? A little. I mean, it's a lot off putting. You know what I mean? It's crazy. Let's get one more talk back. Here we have BB listener JB from Louisville. Play it.

[Joe Getty]

Hey, Buck. So when the Russian Ukraine war started, I was in eighth grade grade and I just graduated my sophomore year of high school, which means this has been going on for way too long. And I'm just really glad to see that we finally have a president who's going to put an end to all this garbage in whatever way he can. Love the show. Thank you guys so much.

[Unknown Host]

Jb. Love having somebody in your age cohort listening. Please tell your friends they'll get well educated on things if they listen to Clay and Buck. Jb, why do you know more than all your friends about all the things? Because you listen to Clay and Buck. At least that's one reason. Please spread the word. And I totally agree with your assessments. Time to end this war. Mark Wayne Mullen. Up next, the senator.

[Unknown Speaker]

Made in America means something to us. When you invest 700 billion annually in American companies and the 13 million workers and families they support, you're investing in the success of Main Street. That's money powering growth in manufacturing, tech, energy and innovation. And it starts with private equity backing American ambition. Learn how private equity keeps American businesses [e-mail] paid for by the American Investment Council.

[Joe Getty]

The Medal of Honor is the highest military decoration in the United States. Recipients have done the improbable, the unexpected, showing immense bravery and sacrifice in the name of something much bigger than themselves.

[Unknown Host]

This medal is for the men who went down that day.

[Joe Getty]

On Medal of Honor Stories of Courage, you'll hear about these heroes and what their stories tell us about the nature of bravery. Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Jack Armstrong]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on Demand? We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and tedious and depressing and makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Unknown Host]

He's Joe Getty.

[Jack Armstrong]

We're Armstrong and Getty. We try to bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Unknown Host]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Jack Armstrong]

We have a winner.

[Unknown Host]

Yes.

[Jack Armstrong]

Listen to Armstrong, you, Getty on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Leon Neyfakh]

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency. It became known as the Iran Contra affair.

[Unknown Host]

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane, I can't begin to tell you. Please.

[Leon Neyfakh]

To hear the whole story, Listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown Host]

This is an iHeart podcast.