Buck Sexton (3:44)

Donald, I hear you're free on Wednesdays.

Unknown Speaker (3:48)

So that was because Trump was going to criminal court on Wednesdays. Ha ha ha. With the preposterous efforts to destroy Trump's.

Clay Travis (3:56)

Ability to run today, Powell Buck, is that the most disastrous political taunt in history, given what happened one month later?

Unknown Speaker (4:06)

If. If they had just listened to me, they would have been in a much better spot because their best option was Biden, but their best option was Biden with no. By the time he was making that taunt with no debates, that's what they should have done. That was the fatal flaw in all of this, was they thought they could pull one over with the debates one more time. And given that Trump hadn't debated in the primary, the Democrats could have very easily said, well, we won't. You know, people have seen enough of these two anyway. I know it's at some level, water under the bridge, but they just misplayed this thing. They just screwed it up the same way they misplayed running against Trump across the board.

Clay Travis (4:48)

Yeah, they totally did. And I think as you break all of this down again, that was one year ago, and Biden completely blown up. And I still think, and I wonder if in the book, they're going to kind of give us an idea of what they intended with the June 27, because I had forgotten that he said he'd debate him twice. Remember, they didn't even attempt the second debate because the first one went so disastrously. But it was Biden making that video and taunting Trump about how much he wanted to debate that actually put this on the calendar. And Buck's right. If they had listened to him, they could have at least continued the vast left wing conspiracy about his health until September or October when they did a debate. And maybe then they could have shot up Biden with enough stuff to make him able to go out and debate. I, I, I tend to think that it would have been even more of an implosion if they had been able to keep him in and not been able to make the change till September. But he would have been able to run. They wouldn't have been able to replace him like they did and switch to Kamala at the last possible minute. But I did want to get into this. You listen to a lot of the discussion, like an hour of it.

Unknown Speaker (6:04)

I was, I was pretty deep into it. Yeah.

Clay Travis (6:07)

For those of you who don't know, major disc debate, major oral argument at the Supreme Court today. And it was actually a little bit complicated because there's kind of two different parts of what they were arguing. And I'm going to try to lay out why I think it's significant. And producer Ali, I sent you a cut of Clarence Thomas that I think gets to the essence of this really, really well. So let me know when that cut is ready. But it is ready. Okay, so Buck here is. So for those of you out there who were not following this, it is a little bit complicated. And just the whole Trump era has been steeped in complicated legal arcana as we have been breaking it all down. But really this is kind of a two parter that they were arguing today. One is the big issue is, hey, is it possible for Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship to be legal and for him to have the power to, to say that birthright citizenship has been misapplied effectively? And citizen and kids, children, babies born to illegal immigrants do not become automatic American citizens. Right. People who are here in this country illegally do not have the ability to come across our border, have a baby and then your baby automatically becomes an American citizen? That's a big picture question. But structurally, this is impacting everything that Trump is trying to do. The question is, should a federal district court judge be able to effectively enjoin a presidential action? Nationwide, there are around 650ish of these federal District court judges.

Unknown Speaker (7:52)

Right. And the only person who has that level of universal constitutional authority based on just what he thinks or she thinks, it's always been a he is the President. So there's a problem here. No one Supreme Court justice can say this is the deal for everybody all across the country. But one federal judge, a lower and even lower than an appeals court judge, one, one circuit court judge could say this is, this is where we're getting into the universal jury universal injunction issue. And I think it's very interesting, Clay, because you know, with the, the two sides arguing this morning, the side that was arguing against on behalf of, I guess the state of New Jersey, which is saying our welfare programs will be too burdened by not knowing if somebody is a citizen or you know, if they've been given citizenship, whether born in the state or outside the state. I mean this, it is a pretty complicated series of interlocking legal issues here. But I can say this. One of the things that kept coming up was they said yeah, ok, sure it's a problem for a federal judge to just be able to do that unless it's like really important and they're really sure. And that's more or less what the anti Trump side of this kept saying. To which the judges, you know, the justices had to say, you guys do this a lot and I'm sure you always think that the people that you like are doing this cuz it's so extreme and so necessary. But it can't just be on the whim of a lower circuit or a lower circuit court judge. What the policy for the whole country is.

Clay Travis (9:28)

Yeah, and it actually goes to me, and this is me nerding out a little bit legally, it actually goes to the essence of separation of powers because there are in theory 3 co equal branches of the United States government. Right. Take you back to 8th grade history or whatever. The executive, the congressional branch and the judicial. The judicial branch relies on the authority of the Supreme Court. That's why it's called the Supreme Court. In order for something to happen, five Supreme Court justices have to agree on it. Circuit courts buck. In order for a circuit court ruling to be in effect, at least two out of three circuit court judges have to agree on something. What is happening with the federal district court is one judge is basically executing on a level that circuit court judges who are above them and Supreme Court judges who are above those circuit, those circuit court judges do not have. In other words, the single authority of a district court judge is actually higher on the flowchart than two of their Superior Court judges. And that might sound a little complicated, but I'm trying to explain it. And Clarence Thomas pointed out that this has really only become an issue in the modern day. And this is the cut I pulled because I think he does a good job of distilling how things have changed.

Unknown Speaker (10:55)

General, when were the first universal injunctions used?

Unknown Speaker (11:03)

We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that warts in 1963 was really the first universal injunction. There's a dispute about Perkins against Lucan's Oil going back to 1940. And of course we point to the court's opinion that reversed that, that that universal injunction issued by the D.C. circuit and said it's, it's profoundly wrong. Now if you look at the, the cases at the either party site, you see a common theme. The cases that we cite like National Treasury, Treasury's employment union, Perkins against Lucan's Oil, Frothingham and Massachusetts against Mellon going back to Scott against Donald Trump and all of those, those are cases where the court considered and addressed the sort of universal, in that case, statewide issue of provision of injunctive relief. So when the court has considered and addressed this, it is consistently said you have to limit the remedy to the plaintiffs of appearing in court and complaining of that remedy.

Unknown Speaker (11:54)

So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions.

Unknown Speaker (11:59)

That's exactly correct. And in fact those are very limited, very rare even in the 1960s. It really exploded in 2006. Seven in our cert petition in Summers against Earth Island Institute, we pointed out that the 9th Circuit had started doing this in a whole bunch of cases involving environmental claims.

Clay Travis (12:14)

Okay, now again, this is in the weeds, but I thought that Clarence Thomas did a really good job. This is only something that's happened recently in our 250ish year history and usually Buck. And again, this is going into the weeds.

Unknown Speaker (12:27)

This also the 9th, the 9th Circuit is the most lunatic left wing activist judicial circuit in the country. So that's where they started doing this. No surprise.

Clay Travis (12:35)

Most Supreme Court cases come about because dis the circuit courts rule different directions. That is as Buck just mentioned, the ninth Circuit is like the West Coast, California prominent where I live, I am in the sixth Circuit. That's Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan, I think a couple of states like that. The fifth Circuit is traditionally seen as one of the most conservative. That's Texas, Louisiana. Uh, I don't have the circuits in front of me right now. Usually the Supreme Court is called on to address circuit splits. That's where the 9th Circuit and the 5th Circuit may have had a different interpretation of the law. Those are the most fertile, the most germane for the Supreme Court to step in on because we need a nationwide decision. And there are two different circuit courts ruling differently. Here you have one random judge in, I don't know, Boston, Massachusetts, deciding what the law should be for the whole nation. Or it could be one random judge in middle of nowhere Texas. It is a direct attack upon the, the entire legitimacy of the courts to give a district court judge more power than his superiors on the circuit and supreme Court.

Unknown Speaker (13:48)

And they can effectively order the entire federal government as though they run the federal government. I mean, yes, there will be appeals and yes, it'll go to the Supreme Court, but for a period of time, they get to be the, the legal emperor, if you will, of America. And this wasn't a problem really until they made it a problem. And they made it a problem by having these, by these left wing judges. We all know how this works. You know, they, they don't feel bound by the constraints of language or law or tradition or anything else. It's, this is so, so important that we have to smash the things that we used to rely on to keep us from doing this. And that's really, in large part, I think, a lot of the argument today. So, I mean, this is really, this wasn't even about the merits of whether birthright citizenship extends to those who are in the country illegally or not. Although it could, if it went against the administration terribly, the Supreme Court, right, could come down and say, you know what? We think even just taking a peek at the merits, this is so bad that we're actually going to uphold this universal injunction until we hear the merits on the case. And that would be a huge win for the non trump side. The other side of this. I think Clay is right. They could issue guidance on the scope of the injunction specifically in this case. That would probably be the best thing you could get from the Supreme Court on this. But to me, I just sit here saying, ok, eventually we're going to have to look at whether you can steal citizenship or not. Because if citizenship can be given to people who have broken the law to get it, you have debased. And I know it's been going on and it has been wrong the whole time. You have debased and devalued what it means to be an American in a way that I think unfortunately is irreparable.

Clay Travis (15:38)

I agree 100% with that. Here's a question for you. And we can debate it or discuss it when we come back because I think it's one of the challenges the court's going to be grappling with. How do you address all of the people who had citizenship for decades based on the belief that birthright citizenship did convey American citizenship?

Unknown Speaker (15:58)

Well, the EO makes this. The EO only affects those after the EO goes into effect.

Clay Travis (16:03)

I get that. But I think there's going to be an equal protection argument on behalf of everybody else because they're going to say this is an arbitrary thing for a president to be able to do under his executive authority. I agree that it should have.

Unknown Speaker (16:15)

Citizenship is inherently kind of arbitrary when.

Clay Travis (16:17)

You think about it, the whole totally, totally is. I mean, look, I think it's an interesting discussion because I think that's one of the challenges they're going to grapple with the most is that all of a sudden. Anyway, we'll talk about it when we come back.

Unknown Speaker (16:31)

Some opportunities are immediate, others take time to develop. Consider this. There are some very well informed people who really believe that our nation has an asset that could be worth as much as $150 trillion. And that asset has been buried under American soil and may well be the basis for creating such a fund. Just to give you an idea of the impact of this resource, it could pay off our national debt four times over. You might say this asset is hiding in plain sight. Time will tell if the Trump administration releases it to the public, but Jim Rickards, former adviser to the White House and Federal Reserve, says if you're over 50, this could be your best chance to build lasting wealth from a once in a century event. To hear more of Jim's thinking, go online to birthright2025.com if he's right, it could make President Trump the most popular president in history and help millions of investors retire wealthy. Go to birthright2025.com to get the details free of charge. That's birthright2025.com paid for by Paradigm Press. Stories of freedom, Stories of America.

Clay Travis (17:31)

Inspirational stories that unite us all. Each day. Spend time with Clay and Buck. Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast men.

Buck Sexton (17:42)

If you're ready to reclaim your edge, listen up. I used to be held back by constant bathroom trips with multiple wake ups during my sleep and looking for restrooms whenever I was out. Then I discovered better man. After just two months I started experiencing fewer trips to the bathroom, less urge to go, and I even slept through some nights. I feel a noticeable boost in my overall well being, even sexual stamina. It gives me the freedom and confidence to live life on my terms. Better man is clinically tested and trusted by thousands of men over 25 years. Ready to take back control. Go to be better now.com to order your supply today. That's be better now.com these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Use as directed. Individual results may vary.

Leon Neyfakh (18:27)

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency.

Unknown Speaker (18:36)

Did you make a mistake in sending arms to Tehran, sir?

Clay Travis (18:39)

No.

Leon Neyfakh (18:41)

It became known as the Iran Contra.

Buck Sexton (18:43)

Affair and I'm not taking any more questions. In just a second, I'm going to ask.

Leon Neyfakh (18:49)

I'm Leon Nayfak, co creator of Slow Burn. In my podcast Iran Contra, you'll hear all the unbelievable details of a scandal that captivated the nation nearly 40 years ago, but which few of us still remember today.

Unknown Speaker (19:07)

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane, I can't begin to tell you. Please do.

Leon Neyfakh (19:19)

To hear the whole story, listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Unknown Speaker (19:27)

Remember Don Lemon used to have a show at cnn? I in fact went on that show many times when CNN was paying me very little to be ambushed by morons on tv. And then they asked me to keep doing it and I said no. This was in the pre Scott Jennings era where you would have three people and they would just cut your mic and they would shout at you and they didn't actually allow you to speak really. So yeah, Don Lemon is still out there talking about things here. He is very upset, Clay, about the South African Afrikaner refugees play 19 this South African farmer bull, which is the most blatantly obvious racist ever. It is blatantly obvious the way that we treat white South Africans who by the way, for the most part, and I am generalizing here, some of the wealthiest people are well to do people in the country. They speak their language, they own most of the land and the property, and somehow they're being granted a fast track to become Americans while they're trying to cut down on immigration from other countries. You know, you get that from where? From the brown people. First of all, believe it or not, Don, there have been times in history in other countries where a small minority of the population or even a considerable minority of the population had a lot of wealth and prestige in society and society turned against them and got really racist and things got really, really bad. See the 20th century and Europe, right? Like I just, but people just want to be upset about this. It's 50 people, Clay.

Clay Travis (21:05)

I think that there is very limited things I think to criticize Trump for. I really mean that. I mean stock market is up for the year, border is secure, prices of almost all goods are down. War is less likely. You have to work really hard to find things to be angry about, like a Maryland man who's a human trafficker being in El Salvador. I mean, they're really, really grasping at straws here. PureTalk offers you incredible offer right now. Better than you could get from AT&T T Mobile or Verizon. And because they don't have the same overhead cost like stores and all those other shenanigans, you benefit as a result with way better pricing. Right now you can get a brand new Samsung Galaxy from PureTalk for free. Qualifying plan starts at just 35 bucks a month. Unlimited talk text, 15 gigs of data and a mobile hotspot on America's most dependable 5G network. You can switch to PureTalk for just 35 bucks a month, cut your cell phone bill in half and get a brand new Samsung Galaxy for free. Dial pound250, say the keywords Clay and Buck. Pure Talk's US customer service team can help you switch in as little as 10 minutes. Again, dial £250 say the keywords clay and Buck to make the switch to Pure Talk today. Welcome back in Clay. Travis Buck Sexton Show Appreciate all of you hanging out with us. We are rolling through the Thursday edition of the program and there is a ton out there. We were just talking about the importance of the Supreme Court hearing that is underway or was underway earlier today having to do with birthright citizenship and also with the power of federal district court judges to issue these universal injunctions and how that can impact things going forward. And I do think it's worth circling back around as Trump 2.0 is underway, the entire Democrat party is in disarray. The fallout of the vast left wing conspiracy relating to Biden's dementia and the COVID up, the fact that Kamala Harris is a joke and there is alongside of Tim Walls, no real chief spokesperson for the Democrat party to even fight back. The Resistance 2.0 basically doesn't exist. There's not even women walking around in vagina hats now crying in the streets. There isn't even anything at all to push back against what Trump is doing. But for Buck, these universal injunctions. And I want to mention this too, because this morning I read about Trump's trip to the Middle East. These are top Democrat officials. This is Axios this morning. I want you to listen. That speech that Trump gave in Saudi Arabia, it was really pretty incredible. This is what top Democrat officials told Axios. Listen to this. Buck quote, gosh, I wish I could work for an administration that could move that quickly. These are top Democrat officials. Listen to these quotes. He does all of this and it's kind of silence. It's met with a shrug, said Ned Price, a former senior State Department official. He has the ability to do things politically that previous presidents did not because he has complete unquestioned authority over the Republican caucus. Another quote. It's hard not.

Unknown Speaker (24:51)

Ned and I worked together at the CIA, by the way.

Clay Travis (24:54)

Oh, wow.

Unknown Speaker (24:54)

I knew Ned.

Clay Travis (24:55)

Okay.

Unknown Speaker (24:55)

Yeah.

Clay Travis (24:56)

Here's the third quote. It's hard not to be simultaneously terrified at the thought of the damage he can cause with such power and awed by his willingness to brazenly shatter so many harmful taboos, said Rob Malley, relating to what Trump is doing in the Middle East. Did you hear the speech? Yeah, I did. It was incredible.

Unknown Speaker (25:20)

I listened to the whole thing as I was incredible carry eggs and watching the baby double tasking like a dad does. And Clay. It was a phenomenal speech, truly.

Clay Travis (25:30)

Yes. And but what I thought was interesting is it was such a good speech that even Democrats who hate Trump are kind of in awe of how this trip has gone. And I do think, and you'll really appreciate this obviously with the CIA background, how challenging what he has managed to pull off is he's got the uae, Qatar and Saudi Arabia all competing to see who can show throw him the best state visit party. He's got Syria celebrating America in the streets and he has isolated Iran now to the point where other than Russia and maybe China, which we know already were traditional allies, who in the Middle east has even got Iran's back? Now I know some people in Israel are upset about Trump's closeness to the uae, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. But I would suggest that that has led to, to Trump being able to put more pressure on Iran than maybe any president in modern history has ever been able to do.

Unknown Speaker (26:47)

Trump says that as of today, he is very close to a deal with Iran that was as part of this, part of this trip. That's what's going on there. And when he was speaking at that Qatari roundtable, he said Iran can't have a nuclear weapon. They're get it but they're very. They're getting very close to doing maybe a deal. I just want to say we've made this joke for about a decade now, Clay, that if Trump came out and said, guys, we've got great news. We have managed the administration's project to cure cancer is a success, there would be some way. The Democrat, first of all, the Democrats wouldn't believe it, and then they would say, you know, what funding did he use for this? And they would have all of these objections, whether it's process objections or whatever, doesn't matter what it is. They'll find a way to not be happy for whatever Trump does. If he gets a nuclear deal, which has been a Democrat dream, I know they'd say, oh, we got one with Obama, wasn't a very good deal. If Trump gets a deal, are they going to say, well, I guess they'll just say it's not a good deal. Right?

Clay Travis (27:54)

We kind of.

Unknown Speaker (27:55)

Yeah, there's nothing he can do that will make them say, you know what, this guy's actually got something, even though he can't run again, and everything else, they will just oppose him to oppose. And this is, I think, what you see with the whole trip and also with. With a lot of what the. Not everything, but a lot of what the administration is doing so far. You just say these are just objectively good things to be trying to accomplish and there's objectively real progress happening on them and all. And you get people that are still saying that this is like fascism or something. I mean, there's this delusion they live in.

Clay Travis (28:28)

Well, and I think this is why the putting them on the defense with the Joe Biden aspect is so important. You and I think it was ludicrous that the 2022 election in any way turned on January 6th. Whatever you think about Dobbs, at least that was a tangible political action that people felt compelled to respond to. But the idea that anybody in November of 2022 reacted in their voting patterns based on what happened on January 6th is frankly crazy. But the media made it seem like such a big deal that I think some people were motivated by that. I think what I jotted this down during one of the breaks. I'm going to give Jake Tapper a small measure of praise here, Buck, and I just. I see your face. I understand that many of you out there also.

Unknown Speaker (29:24)

He likes football. Clay likes football. I knew this was going to happen.

Clay Travis (29:29)

I'm telling you why Jake Tapper writing this book is going to be impossible for Democrats to avoid because it's one of their own writing it. If there are lots of very talented, quote unquote, right wing authors who could write a book about Biden's dementia and they would forswear it, they would ignore it. Just like they have ignored you and me and Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck and all the other people on the premier network, Jesse Kelly, pointing this out for years. Just like they have ignored many of the people on Fox News. Just like they have ignored, frankly, even the Wall Street Journal, when the Wall Street Journal had a big piece about Biden's clear lack of cognitive ability, they can't ignore Jake Tapper. It's like if Rachel Maddow suddenly sits down and says, we got major problems. Joe Biden has dementia, which she knew, but which she covered up and pretended she didn't, they have to cover it on cnn, they have to cover it on msnbc, they have to cover it in the New Yorker, at abc, at cbs, at NBC. It's one of their own telling the story. And that is the only praise I can give Jake Tapper. If Jesse Waters writes this book, they just say, oh, yeah, of course, that Fox News host. If you or I write this book, they're like, oh, of course. The guys who sit where Rush used to, they're just. Jake Tapper is one of their own and he is holding up the dementia and they feel compelled to have to cover it now is partly to your point. The fact that they don't. They'd rather be dumb than be seen as dishonest. Yes. Are they going to claim that they got lied to? Yes. Which is why I liked your tweet yesterday that you brought up yesterday. Why don't you tell us who lied? What about Kari Jean Pierre? You know, has there ever been a more public liar in the history of the United States than Karine Jean Pierre? Jen Psaki, who has her own show on msnbc, she didn't know. She didn't know when, when Jake Sullivan, when Biden can't remember his name. They didn't talk about it inside of the. They all knew. They all knew.

Unknown Speaker (31:54)

I wish they would come forward actually and just say, yeah, we knew he had dementia, but we figured that was a better outcome for the country than the fascist Donald Trump. And that was the decision we made. That would show how at some level craven they are. But at least I could respect that. Like, at least I could say, all right, you guys are ruthless and you're liars.

Clay Travis (32:17)

That is. That is also honest. At least it's honest.

Unknown Speaker (32:20)

Yes. At least it is honest, at least they would be telling us what really happened. Which let me just be clear. That is what happened. It's not. I think that's what happened. That is what happened. We all know it the same way we knew Biden had dementia. We know that they knew and they knew that we knew. Everybody knows. And now the hubris to try to pretend like nobody knew. This is really a.

Clay Travis (32:47)

But you get my point on the Tapper thing. Tapper is one of them. It would be like if Joe Scarborough wrote Biden has dementia, he wouldn't do it.

Unknown Speaker (32:56)

Also, why couldn't Alex Thompson do this himself though, is what I would.

Clay Travis (32:58)

Well, that's my question that I've had from the start.

Unknown Speaker (33:01)

Right. If he's the one that people say, but he was more honest about it, it's like, why do I think he had. He's adding Tapper because Tapper's whole thing within the Democrats is like, that is, first of all, if he came on which who knows if he will or not or if we want to have him or not, he would still claim that he's an objective reporter and does not actually he's. I mean, he's a clear Democrat activist, but he would say he's an objective reporter. He would hold to that. And he is the last gasp of the Democrats clinging to that fiction. So he has a lot of power within the Democrat media ranks because of that. Because if everyone just. And when I say everybody, everyone on the right already knows, but if the country by sort of overwhelming consensus that that pays attention news, a lot of you are fortunate, you don't even care about this crap. But the country that pays attention to, you know, news media is all like, you know what? Jake Tapper was a big partisan fraud too. It's all over for them now. It's just, it's MSNBC and it's Fox. It's two different teams. We all know it, we all get it. There's no more of the pretense because the pretense has been a built in advantage. The pretense of journalism as an objective thing instead of journalism is really just the term given to left wing activists who write stories for left wing news organizations. If that goes away, they lose something that they've been able to rely on for a long time. And it's been going away. But I think this is the death throes of it.

Clay Travis (34:23)

I do think there's a small realization dawning in a lot of people's minds that they thought they were the good guys and they're actually going to be the bad guys of history. They got everything wrong on Covid. They covered up dementia from Joe Biden. I think slowly they are thinking, oh, I always said this, Buck, if you are a history guy or a history gal, be very, very nervous when people say, oh, I'm sure we're on the right side of history. Because history has a way of revealing sometimes things that people did not see in the moment. And my, my argument for a long time has been they are going to be Everyone who thinks they're the hero of this era is actually going to be the villains of history. Fauci, Biden, everyone who held them up and protected them. If history does its job, those guys 100 years from now are going to be seen as the biggest villains in America. I really believe. And I think that's where we're headed. And I think Dr. Jill Biden may end up being one of the greatest villainesses. Is that a right word? I think that's the right word. She's the Cruella Deville of American politics and she's headed there in a real hurry. Did you catch the great news on prescription drug prices? Earlier this week, President Trump recently signed an executive order slashing the cost of prescription drugs and going after the price gouging for drugs you're now getting with Obamacare taking on big pharma, something RFK Jr said he never thought he would see in his lifetime. Now the real fight begins. But you don't have to wait until the fight's over. We want to introduce you to a healthcare insurance provider, Ease for Everyone compared to Obamacare. Ease for Everyone comes with a monthly cost as low as $262. You get access to over 400 prescription drugs for free. They're not just at a lower cost, but no cost. $0. And unlike the broken promise of Obamacare, you actually get to keep your doctor. Plus you get free unlimited virtual primary care. You can have affordable health care for as low $262 a month today. Go online to ease for everyone.com clay that's E-S-E-E-E-S e4f o r everyone.com clay. You can also find it on the clayandbuck.com sponsors page. You ain't imagining it. The world has gone insane. Reclaim your sanity with Clay and Buck. Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast.

Unknown Speaker (37:10)

Hey friend, I know how this feels. Waking up exhausted after multiple trips to the bathroom and feeling embarrassed by sudden leaks. I used to be constantly on edge, searching for a restroom whenever I was out. Then I discovered Better Woman. I was skeptical at first, but two months in, everything changed. I experienced improved bladder control, no more heart stopping moments when I laugh or sneeze, less urge to go deeper and more restful sleep. I finally felt like myself again, confident and in control. Better Woman is natural, effective, clinically tested and trusted by Women for over 25 years. Ready to take back your control? Head over to bebetternow.com to order your supply today. That's bebetternow.com these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Use as directed. Individual results may vary.

Leon Neyfakh (38:10)

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency.

Unknown Speaker (38:18)

Did you make a mistake in sending arms to Tehran, sir?

Clay Travis (38:22)

No.

Leon Neyfakh (38:23)

It became known as the Iran Contra.

Buck Sexton (38:26)

Affair and I'm not taking any more questions. In just a second I'm going to ask.

Leon Neyfakh (38:31)

I'm Leon Naifak, co creator of Slow Burn. In my podcast Iran Contra, you'll hear all the unbelievable details of a scandal that captivated the nation nearly 40 years ago, but which few of us still remember today.

Unknown Speaker (38:50)

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane I can't begin to tell you. Please do.

Leon Neyfakh (39:01)

To hear the whole story, listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Unknown Speaker (39:09)

All right, it's that time on the show when I need to remind myself and Clay and all of you to get a little pick me up from Crockett coffee. Go to crockettcoffee.com please subscribe. If you do and use code book, you'll get a signed copy of Clay's American Playbook. Get them while you can. Got two new books coming out end of this year and beginning of next year from the Clay and Buck Library, I guess you could say, and much other good stuff on that site. New mugs available now, including the Overmountain Club mug, which is very special and it's delicious coffee. You should go check it out. If you've never had mushroom coffee, let me add it's really good. It's great in the afternoon, about half the caffeine and normal coffee, plus all kinds of antioxidants and good health benefits stuff. Crockettcoffee.com please go check it out. Don't drink whatever coffee you're drinking. If it's not Crockett, it's not good enough for you, my friends Go check it out at Crockett Coffee. Clay, I also found out something this morning. More marital experience here. I was not really aware of this. And now I'm such a young man in the marriage game when, yeah, I'm a newbie into all this. Your wife can look at you and be a little unhappy. Quite unhappy, quite sternly. And you can ask her, hey, honey, what's going on? She said, nothing, I'm fine. And you say, are you sure? She goes, I'm fine. And then you know she's not fine. And then you say, okay. And then you try to, like, escape the situation. And right before you leave the room, she goes, you know what you did in my dream last night? And now the answer to that is, of course, no. But, Clay, I do know that you could be in trouble as husband for whatever the wife has had a dream about.

Clay Travis (40:59)

All right? So here's the flip side. Can you imagine holding her accountable in any way or being angry for her based on something that she did in your dream? Has this happened at any point in your relationship that you can remember so far?

Unknown Speaker (41:13)

No.

Clay Travis (41:13)

Yes.

Unknown Speaker (41:14)

No.

Clay Travis (41:14)

So do you think it's only, I don't know because I'm with you?

Unknown Speaker (41:17)

No. But my understanding is these are the rules of marriage. Like, wife is allowed to be annoyed over morning coffee for at least a little bit if you were naughty in the dream that she had, even if she knows it was a dream. These are the rules. I don't make the rules.

Clay Travis (41:29)

No, no, I get it. I'm just trying to think, why would women be able to get mad at their husbands? But I'm just asking because I can't recall ever being angry at my wife over something that she did in my dream. Right.

Unknown Speaker (41:42)

Has Laura ever been mad at you for what you did in her dream?

Clay Travis (41:45)

That's a great question. We've been married for almost 21 years. I'm sure I've given her ample reasons to be mad at me for many reasons, both awake and dreaming over those 21 years. But I can't remember. But it feels like probably yes is the answer. But it is an interesting question. Because my point is, if you had been angry at her, I don't think it would be accepted.

Unknown Speaker (42:08)

No, of course not. I'm a dude. We can't do that.

Clay Travis (42:10)

Yeah.

Unknown Speaker (42:11)

Not allowed.

Clay Travis (42:11)

Why is it acceptable the opposite direction? I think it's an interesting question. I'm going to go downstairs and ask. Men and women are.

Unknown Speaker (42:17)

Men and women are different, Buddy. You know that I do know.

Clay Travis (42:20)

No way. Next thing you're going to tell me men shouldn't be able to play women's sports.

Unknown Speaker (42:26)

Made in America means something to us.

Clay Travis (42:28)

When you invest 700 billion annually in.

Unknown Speaker (42:31)

American companies and the 13 million workers and families they support, you're investing in the success of Main Street. That's money powering growth in manufacturing, tech, energy and innovation. And it starts with private equity backing American ambition. Learn how private equity keeps American businesses growing@investmentcouncil.org paid for by the American Investment Council.

Unknown Speaker (42:57)

Hey friend, I know how it feels waking up exhausted after multiple trips to the bathroom and feeling embarrassed by sudden leaks. I used to be constantly on edge, searching for a restroom whenever I was out. Then I discovered better women. I was skeptical at first, but two months in, everything changed. I experienced improved bladder control, no more heart stopping moments when I laugh or sneeze, less urge to go deeper and more restful sleep. I finally felt like myself again, confident and in control. Better Women is natural, effective and trusted by Women for over 25 years. Ready to take back your control? Head over to bebetternow.com to order your supply today. That's bebetternow.com these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease users directed. Individual results may vary.

Leon Neyfakh (44:04)

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency. It became known as the Iran Contra Affair.

Unknown Speaker (44:16)

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane I can't begin to tell you. Please do.

Leon Neyfakh (44:26)

To hear the whole story, listen to Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Clay Travis (44:34)

You're listening to an iHeart podcast.