Weekly Review With Clay and Buck H3 - Epstein's Client List

Summary

Summary of "Weekly Review With Clay and Buck H3 - Epstein's Client List"

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, hosted by iHeartPodcasts, delves into pressing issues in news and politics with a blend of intelligence and humor. In the episode released on July 12, 2025, titled "Epstein's Client List," Clay Travis and Buck Sexton engage in an in-depth discussion about recent developments related to Jeffrey Epstein's client list and the broader implications for political figures and intelligence operations.

---

I. Introduction and YouTube Promotion

At the outset [00:00-02:39], Clay Travis emphasizes the importance of expanding their reach to younger audiences through their YouTube channel. He discusses how modern youth derive news primarily from platforms like YouTube and TikTok, rather than traditional media. Clay urges listeners to subscribe to their channel to engage a demographic that might not otherwise interact with their content, emphasizing the need to influence the worldview of younger generations. He states:

"My kids get almost all of their news from two places, YouTube and TikTok. That's it. They don't watch television other than sporting events."
— Clay Travis [01:30]

---

II. Biden's Doctor and the Fifth Amendment

The hosts transition to discussing a pivotal topic: the recent invocation of the Fifth Amendment by President Biden's doctor during questioning. Senator Mike Lee posed the question of whether the doctor, Dr. O'Connor, should be granted immunity to testify regarding President Biden's health.

Buck Sexton admits limited knowledge on the matter, stating:

"I go through life knowing more than lawyers about a lot of legal questions... I don't know this one."
— Buck Sexton [03:09]

Clay Travis elaborates on the complexities involving attorney-client privilege and HIPAA laws, noting that while the doctor's medical assessment of Biden cannot be compelled without consent, issues regarding potential conspiracies surrounding President Biden's public statements could be examined without violating medical confidentiality. He suggests that the doctor could testify about whether there was pressure to present Biden in a certain light, without disclosing private medical details.

---

III. Epstein's Client List and Pam Bondi's Handling

The central focus of the episode centers around the controversial handling of Jeffrey Epstein's client list by former Attorney General Pam Bondi. A call from Ty in San Antonio brings this issue to the forefront.

a. Caller Ty's Perspective [08:34-31:40]

Ty applauds the hosts for continuing after the passing of Rush Limbaugh but criticizes Pam Bondi's portrayal of Epstein's files. He argues that Bondi downplayed the severity of the evidence in possession, suggesting that significant names might be implicated, potentially causing severe economic and political repercussions. He believes that the FBI's characterization of the materials as merely downloaded child pornography from the internet minimizes the broader, possibly more sinister implications. Ty states:

"There are names on this, on this connection book that he had that could, that could really, really upset the world in an economic devastating way."
— Caller Ty [26:11]

b. Hosts' Analysis [08:43-34:32]

Clay and Buck counter Ty's assertions by arguing that Pam Bondi's remarks were misleading. Clay asserts that the materials are primarily child pornography downloaded by Epstein, not direct evidence implicating other high-profile individuals. He emphasizes that:

"This is what they actually have. It's kitty porn that was downloaded by Epstein that he's not in."
— Clay Travis [11:43]

Buck supports this by stating that Dan Bongino and Cash Patel are committed to integrity and would not suppress evidence to protect individuals. He criticizes Bondi's public statements for being underwhelming, suggesting that if there were substantial evidence against more prominent figures, it would have been pursued rather than downplayed.

Both hosts agree that while Epstein was undoubtedly a pedophile, the implication that his client list involves other powerful individuals is not substantiated by the current evidence held by the FBI and DOJ. They further discuss the possibility of past intelligence-related activities by Epstein, such as blackmail operations, but maintain skepticism about the existence of a concealed client list.

They also address the messaging mishandled by Bondi, which may have led to confusion and frustration among supporters, particularly within the MAGA community, who believe in uncovering deeper truths behind Epstein's operations.

---

IV. Trump's Position on Epstein and Related Investigations

The show touches upon former President Trump's stance on the Epstein matter, highlighting his focus on the existing evidence of Epstein's crimes while moving on to address more immediate concerns facing the nation. Clay notes that Trump emphasized:

"This guy was an awful pedophile, and he's dead. Let's focus on the things that really matter."
— Clay Travis [11:43-12:06]

Furthermore, the discussion shifts to ongoing investigations within the FBI and DOJ, including potential criminal charges against figures like James Comey and John Brennan related to the 2017 Russia investigation. Buck expresses skepticism about the likelihood of these charges resulting in prosecution, citing statute limitations and the high-profile nature of the individuals involved.

---

V. FBI and DOJ Investigations

Clay and Buck debate the efficacy and transparency of the current FBI and DOJ leadership, suggesting a cultural shift towards accountability by opening investigations into past officials. They discuss the potential motivations and outcomes of these investigations, with Buck expressing doubt that significant legal consequences will emerge due to procedural limitations and the credibility of the accused individuals.

---

VI. Listener Calls and Discussions

Throughout the episode, multiple listeners contribute to the conversation, raising points about the handling of Epstein's case and the perceived lack of substantial evidence against other supposed clients. The hosts reiterate their stance that while Epstein committed undeniable crimes, the lack of evidence against others suggests either the absence of such a broader conspiracy or the obliteration of any incriminating material.

Buck reinforces trust in the integrity of Dan Bongino and Cash Patel, asserting:

"Dan and Cash are not sitting there going, yeah, it would look bad politically. So we're going to cover for these pedos. They, they, they would not do it."
— Buck Sexton [27:32]

---

VII. Conclusion

In summary, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton critically assess the current responses to the Epstein case, highlighting inconsistencies in public statements by officials like Pam Bondi and dismissing theories that suggest a hidden, powerful client list backed by sufficient evidence. They maintain a focus on presenting verified information while addressing listener concerns and promoting responsible journalism.

---

Notable Quotes

1. Clay Travis on Youth News Consumption:

   "My kids get almost all of their news from two places, YouTube and TikTok. That's it. They don't watch television other than sporting events."
   — Clay Travis [01:30]

2. Clay Travis on Potential Conspiracy:

   "If somebody sits down and says, hey, I don't want to... you're coming out of it and you're telling us Joe Biden is 100% able to be president, Right. And that is a conspiracy."
   — Clay Travis [05:11]

3. Clay Travis on Epstein's Files:

   "This is what they actually have. It's kitty porn that was downloaded by Epstein that he's not in."
   — Clay Travis [11:43]

4. Buck Sexton on Specificity in Claims:

   "They're saying, hold on. I think specificity, Ty, I think specifically matters."
   — Buck Sexton [27:43]

5. Buck Sexton on Integrity of Bongino and Patel:

   "Dan and Cash are not sitting there going, yeah, it would look bad politically. So we're going to cover for these pedos. They, they, they would not do it."
   — Buck Sexton [27:32]

6. Clay Travis on Trump's Focus:

   "This guy was an awful pedophile, and he's dead. Let's focus on the things that really matter."
   — Clay Travis [11:43-12:06]

---

This comprehensive summary encapsulates the key discussions, insights, and conclusions of the podcast episode, providing a clear understanding for those who haven't listened to the show.

Transcript

[Buck Sexton]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Clay Travis]

Clay Travis, Buck Sexton show, our number three. We appreciate all of you hanging out with us. No guest schedule this hour, so we'll take some of your calls, some of your talkbacks as well. Also, I was talking about this with Buck off the air. We want you to subscribe to our YouTube channel. It has been growing quite a lot, but I want it to go over 100,000 subscribers. It is in the neighborhood of 75,000 right now. And I was just kind of scrolling through because my kids are on YouTube all the time. And my thought is that if you have kids or grandkids and you hear an argument on this show and you are thinking, man, I wish my kids would pay attention to this because maybe they're being taught something different in high school. College grandkids, they are much more likely to respond to something that they see on YouTube. Um, that's just the truth and the reality. And maybe if you send them YouTube links from us and they are willing to watch them, they'll start getting exposed to other aspects of the algorithm that are also feeding them things. And I just gotta tell you, my kids get almost all of their news from two places, YouTube and TikTok. That's it. They don't watch television other than sporting events. With me, they are on YouTube and they are on TikTok. And I bet if you have kids or grandkids that are similar in age to mine, mine are 17 to 10, three boys, as you guys know, and they all. That's where they get their news from. That's where they get their worldview from. And so we need to bump up our numbers on YouTube in a significant way. And so I would ask you guys, get out there, search us out Clay and buck on YouTube and. And subscribe, and you can sometimes be pulling video clips waving at you right now that your kids are more likely to pay attention to. They may not listen to the radio, they may not listen to news on podcast, but they may very well see it on YouTube. So I would like to bump those numbers up. You can search out my name, Clay Travis Buck Sexton, and you'll find the Clay and Buck show. If you just go to YouTube.com type in clay and Buck. Boom, we will come in. Make sure you spell Buck correctly, because otherwise I don't know what's gonna. I don't know what's gonna show up.

[Buck Sexton]

It's a whole different. Whole different situation you're in.

[Clay Travis]

That's a very different world.

[Buck Sexton]

Gotta hit the B. Gotta hit the.

[Clay Travis]

B. Gotta hit the B. Gotta hit the B.

[Buck Sexton]

All right.

[Clay Travis]

A lot of you out there wanting to react to a variety of different things. Let me hit you with this. We talked about Biden's doctor taking the Fifth Amendment on the top of the show. Senator Mike Lee, and maybe we should offer him an invite to come on and talk about this. Just tweeted in the last five minutes. Now that Dr. O' Connor has invoked his Fifth Amendment rights, should he be offered immunity to get him to testify? Really interesting question from Senator Lee.

[Buck Sexton]

Interesting question. Question for you. I don't know this. Generally. I go through life knowing more than lawyers about a lot of legal questions. But. But that's. Put that aside. I don't know this one. So you helped me out because you actually went to law school. Couldn't. How does it work when you have the. It's like. Isn't it like attorney client privilege a bit with a doctor and a patient? So you can't compel testimony.

[Clay Travis]

This is important.

[Buck Sexton]

Yes.

[Clay Travis]

So, okay, so there. I would say there's two pathways here. One, yes. You cannot have the doctor testify about what his medical review necessarily showed of Joe Biden. All right. Like HIPAA laws, he can't say without the patient's consent, usually. Which makes sense, by the way. Now, you could maybe say for presidents, there should be a different standard, but I don't think most of you would want your doctor sitting down in testimony.

[Buck Sexton]

Doctors, lawyers, priests should have true confidentiality. There's an important reason for that.

[Clay Travis]

Yes. And that. That. Which is also why the law historically has said you can't be compelled to testify against. Okay, but that is not what I think his most interesting testimony would be. I'm not asking. And this is important. I'm glad you asked this question, because the key for him is not his medical diagnosis of Joe Biden. It is asking him whether people told him and conspired with him to have him say things publicly that he did not believe were true. That's different than the medical analysis.

[Buck Sexton]

This gets a little bit into the fraud exception for attorney client privilege. Right. If your lawyer is like a mob lawyer and he's involved in helping you orchestrate actual criminal activity, knowingly, a attorney client privilege is out the window on that all of a sudden. Right. So if a doctor is being asked to testify about criminality around him, that's a different thing than when you touched his. You know, when you touched your patient's knee with the little hammer thing that it, you know, did the knee flick?

[Clay Travis]

Look, if somebody sits down and Says, hey, I don't want to.

[Buck Sexton]

I'm obviously not a doctor. That was the best I could do. Sorry.

[Clay Travis]

Yeah, no, here's a good way to explain it. If. If I sit down with the doctor and if I'm one of Biden's politburo, if I'm one of his top advisers and I sit down with the doctor and I say, hey, I don't care what this physical examination shows. You're coming out of it and you're telling us Joe Biden is 100% able to be president, Right. And that is a conspiracy, right? Like, because you're not actually asking him what his medical diagnosis was. As soon as they tell you, let me take it outside of the president, right? There have been conflicts in the world of sports because team doctors are treating players and the coaches are always like, hey, we want this guy good to go. He's helped. This is right.

[Buck Sexton]

This is in any given Sunday with one of my favorites, James woods, when he's the team doctor for that football team. I've seen that movie for some reason, many great.

[Clay Travis]

It's actually a great movie.

[Buck Sexton]

And he actually gives this whole speech. He's like, these are warriors. I knew that they wanted it. Does the whole thing. It's very good role for Mr. Woods, who, I don't know, maybe even listens to the show sometimes. Maybe I've met James a few times, so. But yes, same. That's the same principle, right, where it's.

[Clay Travis]

It's the conflict between what your actual medical diagnosis is and the reality of what the expectation of your medical diagnosis should be. So if I, like, again, if you take it outside of the world of Biden and politics and you say, okay, you are the coach and you've got a player who's injured, and that player may not be 100%, and it may not even be healthy for him to be on the field, but if he's on the field, your team has a better chance of winning. And if you sit down with the doctor before he goes in for his consultation and you say, doc, we know that no matter what you see, that quarterback's going to be on the field Saturday or Sunday, right fist pound. He could theoretically, without having to go into his actual diagnosis, say there was pressure being put on me to say Joe Biden was fine, even without me having to have done my. My analysis of Biden, by the way. I think this was true. Here's another example of something he could testify about. Was he involved in any way in a debate about whether Joe Biden should have a cognitive test or not, right? Did he sit around as the politics people without knowing what the test results might be? Did they sit around and say, hey, Doc, will you lie and say he passed a cognitive test even if he didn't? Like, we need to know what you're gonna say before we even do this test. What if he fails? Will you lie? I mean, again, I think Senator Mike Lee is asking a really good question here, which is, hey, is was there a conspiracy that did not involve directly your medical analysis? He could theoretically testify to that without having to worry about HIPAA related issues. A bunch of you want to weigh in on a variety of different topics. All right, so let's see. Ty in San Antonio, one was whole. Let's start with Tommy and Clearwater first. Tommy, what you got?

[Caller]

Hey, brother. First of all, I want to say thank God for your guys to show. After Rush Limbaugh died, I thought AM radio was over for me, but then you guys came along. So thank you.

[Clay Travis]

Thank you for that.

[Buck Sexton]

Thank you.

[Caller]

But I called about your Pam Bondi, the Epstein files. You guys seemed like you were mad at her. And I think she's a hero. I think she was the only one who was willing to get out there and talk about it. And she obviously got shut down by people above her.

[Clay Travis]

I appreciate, I appreciate the call. You can make that argument. I think that's not the good argument to make. And in fact, Pam Bondi, we should play this audio because there has been a ton of talk. Pam Bondi, I think, has not been articulate enough about many of the issues that she is dealing with. She has tended to, I think, overpromise and under deliver in some of her media availabilities.

[Buck Sexton]

I'd also just say no one should have thought like, if Pam had called me, okay, you know, she can get my number. She knows plenty of people who know me, said, hey, we're just going to drop a kind of, I think a good word for it is perfunctory, meaning, you know, just the, the most sort of basic and, and limited stuff. A perfunctory memo on a Sunday night that just like, yeah, nothing to see. We've done everything. See you later. Of course that wasn't going to work. That was not a good idea. You need to say, hey, guys, announcement from the doj. We're gonna have a presser. The Attorney General's gonna address America. She's going to read from a prepared statement. She's going to know what she's going to say in advance. You know, Maybe be flanked by Cash and Bongino, who are both patriots and warriors, and, you know, just like, that's what needed to happen here. So. I'm sorry, from an. I'm not even talking. Don't even get into the. Oh, but the conspiracy and the COVID I'm just saying the op. We can talk about that, too. The optics of how this was handled was just abominable. It was not only.

[Clay Travis]

Not only that statement. What about giving the binders with no actual information in it to all of those?

[Buck Sexton]

Well, that was strike. That was strike one. And maybe strike one and two. That's what I mean. You know, she had time to learn about what's going on here.

[Clay Travis]

Okay, but. So I want to play this, because I had them pull this. In fact, two things. Uh, first, this is Pam Bondi. There's lots of talk about. Hey, there's thousands of. Of child porn documents and videos and everything else that. That were in the possession of Jeffrey Epstein. Why are there no charges coming? I'm gonna have to make this clearer than Pam Bondi has been able to. That's stuff that Epstein downloaded from the Internet. Everything that they have in their possession in the FBI, in the Department of Justice, relating to Epstein. This is something that I didn't know because I think they've not addressed this publicly very well. I thought, oh, this must be Epstein in videos with minors, like, engaging in criminal behavior.

[Buck Sexton]

Yes.

[Clay Travis]

This is just stuff he downloaded off the Internet of child porn, kiddie porn. I mean, it's awful, but it's something that they prosecute all the time. She said that yesterday. It didn't get very much attention. This was in the Cabinet Office. This is important. This is what they actually have. It's kitty porn that was downloaded by Epstein that he's not in.

[Buck Sexton]

Listen to the tens of thousands of video.

[Clay Travis]

They turned out to be child porn.

[Buck Sexton]

Downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein. Child porn is what? They were never going to be released. Never going to see the light of day.

[Clay Travis]

Okay. She hasn't done a good job. I had a bunch of conversations. This is important. It's not actually Epstein in the child porn. It's not other people that he knows in the child porn. It's just nasty stuff on the Internet that he was attracted to.

[Buck Sexton]

This is what they have. Okay? And to your point, they need to be very clear. This is the evidence that the FBI has. This is what they've. Okay. And this is stuff that would send anybody away for, you know, 25 to life and. Okay, all true. That needs to be more Clear. That does not mean, for those of you who still have questions, that the surveillance setup that we all know Epstein had in these homes was not used at an earlier time for Epstein recording himself, which I assume he did. Why else did he do this? And possibly, and I believe likely other people as part of a blackmail operation. This is a very important separation to understand. There's what Bondi and Bongino and Cash, and there's the evidence that they have when they took over the FBI. They haven't been running the FBI for 20 years. There's the evidence that they have, and then there's what we know about Epstein previously and what we can surmise and believe and analyze he was doing. Additionally, one does not negate the other. So I can say these guys are showing us what they have. Right, Clay? But also say I still believe that Epstein. That there were other, quote, unquote clients and that there was blackmail going on. That's not to say that the FBI is lying to us about it. I don't believe they're lying about what they have now.

[Clay Travis]

Correct. And I think that Pam Bondi has actually not been articulate enough in explaining these things, and that's why we're having to talk to you guys with it right now. I mean, I just played that audio. She didn't even. I don't think in that scenario, do a great job of it. And for those of you out there, this is why Trump. Let's quickly play this, or actually, we'll play it when we come back here. But this is why Trump is saying, like, we got to move on. This guy was an awful pedophile, and there's evidence of that. He killed himself. He's dead. Even if you don't believe he killed himself, there are no other crimes out there in the FBI file that are prosecutable. And I would just say this. We got a break. Do you think Dan Bongino and Cash Patel wouldn't love to be able to prosecute somebody they would love more than anything in their heart's desire to have found evidence to allow more people to be prosecuted? It isn't there. It just isn't there. Now, to Buck's point, I think there's a good chance that it's not there because it got destroyed. And when they came into office, it's just. There's not anything there. There's no one to be prosecuted. We'll play Trump and I'll explain what I think Trump is saying, too. In a second. We come back, a lot of retailers, venues going Cashless now. And while it's super convenient, it also prevents more opportunities for cyber hackers. Online identity theft thrives with credit card only options. The way it works is cyber hackers plant malware reads every credit card PIN number. It's important to understand how it works and it's important to understand the dangers out there on Internet purchases. And that's why you need to be a Lifelock member. If you're a Lifelock member and you become a victim of identity theft, a dedicated US based lifelock restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed. Or your Money back. Join now. Say 40% off your first year with my name, Clay, as the promo code. That's lifelock.com my name Clay, as the promo code. You can call 1-800-LIFELOCK. Go online to lifelock.com use promo code Clay for 40% off. That's lifelock.Com promo code Clay, 40% off. You know them as conservative radio hosts. Now just get to know them as guys on the Sunday hang podcast with Clay and Buck. Find it in their podcast feed on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Buck Sexton]

All right, welcome back in, everybody. Just a reminder from yesterday during the Cabinet, a very lengthy cabinet meeting. Here's how Trump reacted to, to the president that we all know and love. Here's how he reacted to that question about Jeffrey Epstein. Play it.

[Clay Travis]

Your memo and release yesterday in Jeffrey Epstein, it left some lingering mysteries. One of the biggest ones is whether he ever worked for an American or foreign intelligence agency.

[Buck Sexton]

The former labor secretary who was Miami.

[Clay Travis]

U.S. attorney Alex Costa, he allegedly said that he did work for an intelligence agency. So could you resolve whether or not he did? And also could you say why there was a minute missing from the jailhouse tape on the native state?

[Buck Sexton]

Yeah, sure, if I could. I just interrupted. Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years.

[Clay Travis]

You're asking.

[Buck Sexton]

We have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things. And are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable.

[Clay Travis]

Do you want to waste the time.

[Buck Sexton]

And do you feel like answering? I don't mind. So I just, I want to point out here, you know, because people are, people are. There's a lot of criticism being directed at. It's really Bondi, Cash and Bongino. Clay and I can both speak for Cash and Bongino as guys that we know and trust and are. And there's no, there's no way to twist either of their arms to get them to cover up something that they know of, I'm sorry, it doesn't exist. Bondi, I think, has made some optical mistakes or, you know, rather, you know, the PR aspect of it.

[Clay Travis]

Communication has not been.

[Buck Sexton]

Elite is Trump. Trump is compromised. Guys, come on, come on. Like, let's, let's all, let's all take a moment here. Trump is, I do not believe for one second Trump is compromised.

[Clay Travis]

Well, and he knows what the evidence is. And he's like, this guy's just an awful pedophile and he's dead. Let's focus on the things that really matter.

[Buck Sexton]

All right? Let's talk about how beneath this great nation of ours is an asset that some people believe is worth more than $160 trillion. That's not just some white wild speculation. It's a documented fact. This endowment, so to speak, is so large it could pay off our national debt four times over. But why has it been kept secret for so long and not contemplated as a potential asset for all of us to enjoy? Time will reveal those details, but thanks to a Supreme Court decision, the Trump administration could soon release this endowment for the public. This is all Jim Rickards idea, my friends, former adviser of the White House and Federal Reserve. He says if you're over 50, this could be your best chance to build lasting wealth from a once in a century event. That's a big statement, but you should hear for yourself why Jim believes this. Jim Rickards has a long track record of big prediction. Go to birthright2025.com to hear why Jim Rickards thinks this endowment could be a huge opportunity for Americans who take advantage of it. Again, that's birthright2025.com paid for by Paradigm Press.

[Clay Travis]

Welcome back in Clay Travis Buck Sexton show. We got a lot of you who want to weigh in. If you'll update me, Greg, on the absolute latest there. But I do want to play this because a lot of things. Okay, what's the FBI doing? What is the. They're doing a lot of things. They're moving the headquarters. Remember, they've been there six months. They're trying to change the overall culture. But they're also opening an investigation into James Coney, James Comey and John Brennan. And there are potentially criminal charges coming over the 2017 Russia, Russia, Russia conspiracy and hoax this is underway. Here is President Trump talking about that earlier today in a press availability cut 33. James Comey and John Brennan now under criminal investigation related to the Trump Russia probe. Do you want to see these two guys behind bars?

[Buck Sexton]

Well, I know nothing about it.

[Caller]

Other than what I read today. But I will tell you, I think.

[Buck Sexton]

They'Re very dishonest people.

[Caller]

I think they're crooked as hell, and maybe they have to pay a price for that. I believe they are truly bad people and dishonest people. So whatever happens, happens.

[Clay Travis]

And I think this is evidence of trying to clean out and address the culture there. And there are a lot of things that have to be cleaned up. And I think these guys are doing their best, and it's easy to sit around. And I will say this, I mean, again, this is why I think logic oftentimes plays into this substantially. Maybe the most dishonest thing that has happened in Trump 2.0, leaving aside the judges, I'm curious if you would sign off on 2.0, is the idea that Trump is somehow involved with Epstein. Right. I mean, it's the most ludicrous thing on the planet because do you really think Democrats wouldn't have put that around Trump's neck and tried to drown him with it for the last decade? It doesn't exist. And so I think that is almost a version of Trump 2.0. The Russia collusion. Russia collusion was a total lie. I mean, you really lived this buck. From the intelligence analyst perspective. They laundered a garbage Steel report Steele dossier, and they tried to create based on. I know this well because I bought Facebook ads as someone who runs a media company and was involved in a lot of the Facebook ad universe, they manufactured a couple of hundred thousand dollars of crappy ads that were bought on Facebook by Russian interest into somehow swinging the outcome of the 2016 election. And they really sold that to a lot of morons in the media who ran with that as the truth. And I think the set, the secondary argument here of somehow Trump is involved with Epstein is every bit as dishonest as the Russia collusion hoax.

[Buck Sexton]

They. They wanted to run with it. That's part one of it. Right. So it's always hard to separate where, where, where the lib journos are just dumb versus where they're dishonest because they're both. But, you know, there is a sort of, occasionally, one is a dominant theme and the other one recedes a little bit. But Clay, on the. I have good news, bad news on the Brennan and Clapper thing. You want, you want the good news, bad news on this? Is this going to be.

[Clay Travis]

Well, my concern is immediately, when I, when I hear this is just statute of limitations. So. Like that. So you're already.

[Buck Sexton]

You're already. Yeah, that's cool. You're stealing my thunder a little bit here. That's all right. No, so on the good news part of it, I think that you're going to see revelations of even more just underhanded bureaucratic skullduggery from the, you know, investigation of what they were doing. Essentially, you're going to have to be, you're going to have to be somebody who will embrace feigned a level of stupidity that's not plausible. To think that these guys didn't know what they were doing is wrong. I think that should come out. I think that will come out more on the, on the wamp, wamp side of it, the not so good side of it. I would be absolutely shocked if criminal charges were brought against Brennan or Clapper for a combination of reasons. Statute of limitations, which you already said on most federal, low, low level federal things is five years low level. You know, there's a lot of, there's a lot of federal crimes which there's no statute of limitations, but for most low level kind of things like, you know, lying under oath kind of stuff, and you're looking at five years. Yeah. And so the statute of limitations probably run on a lot of that. And I think that beyond that, a lot of these guys, they're slippery. Someone like a Comey, a Brennan, a Clapper, they know this system. They know the game. They know what to put in email and what not to. And I just don't, I just don't want you guys to get, I don't want anyone to get their hopes up that anyone is going to face real consequences for that Russia collusion thing. At this point, I said this about Benghazi and Hillary and I got so much hate and it was not hate, but anger from people. And I was right. No one's, no one's getting arrested or frog marched out of their, out of their office or their, their home based on Russia collusion stuff. At this point in my mind, I, if I'm wrong, I will come on the air and I will admit it. But I'm just preparing you for. Yes, it's good to get the truth out. I'm not, I'm not saying otherwise. They're not going to get prosecuted and imprisoned based on Russia collusion at this point in, in my opinion. So we'll see.

[Clay Travis]

Let's take some of these calls. A lot of you stacking up variety of different takes out there. Ty in San Antonio, what you got for us?

[Caller]

Hey guys, thanks for taking my call. First time, long time. So this Epstein situation, it seems like to me, and this is my personal opinion that there's a bit of insulting of the intelligence here. And I want to address Pam Bondi's explanation first. And it comes across to me as low IQ and low energy. If she wants, and I'll just speak for maga, right, if she wants the MAGA nation to believe that all they found was kiddie porn, child porn, and Epstein had, you know, was just viewing this, nothing there, then it really doesn't. A guy with his sexual deviant nature, his connections, his money, and not to mention guys he needed to fly people to an island to have sex with them. Okay, I'm a 42 year old bachelor, I don't need an island. Guys, I got a house with rooms.

[Clay Travis]

Right, all right, but so let me, let me, let me, let me ask you this question. If you're right about all that, and I'm not saying you're wrong, why would the FBI keep all of that information for years if they were protecting Epstein?

[Caller]

Brother, I think there are, and I really want to get to Trump here also, but I think there are names on this, on this connection book that he had that could, that could really, really upset the, the, the world in an economic devastating way. Potentially. You know, different things. That man extrapolating it out, there are big time names on there. And to say, you know, well, he was picking people up in a private jet, taking them to this island, lining and dining them and nothing nefarious, criminal or, you know, sinister happened.

[Clay Travis]

There is absolutely, there's a, hold on, I appreciate that argument, but there's a difference between I think, think something inappropriate, illegal, whatever words you want to put in, indefensible happened and what can be proven. What I'm saying is if you are protecting Epstein, let's presume that your argument is correct. Let's just, I'm not saying I agree with it. I'm just saying let's logically.

[Buck Sexton]

Well, it's really not protecting Epstein, to be clear. It's. If the argument is protecting other people, that Epstein's clients, so to speak, you know, his, the other individuals who were.

[Clay Travis]

Involved in the sex crimes, why wouldn't they destroy all of that evidence?

[Buck Sexton]

Well, this is my thing. I don't believe that that evidence hasn't long since been destroyed. And that's, that's, that, that's my, that's.

[Clay Travis]

My, that's my question for Ty. If I'm, I'm saying you're right, like all of these things are true. If you believe that that existed, why would it still exist? When the Trump 2.0 team comes in. That's my, that's my argument. I'm not saying that none, any of the things you're saying are incorre. I'm saying you're in order for this to still be true. What you are saying is all of the evidence is there of inappropriate, illegal, impermissible behavior. Right. And that the people that are now there with Trump 2.0 see all of it, reviewed it all, and are now choosing to lie to you about what is in the possession of the FBI and the Department of Justice. That to me doesn't add up. Destroying evidence.

[Buck Sexton]

Go ahead.

[Caller]

You know, you know, much of the evidence that I'm speaking to I think is circumstantial, guys, to be honest with you, and.

[Buck Sexton]

Right, but that can't necessarily be proven in a court of law, Ty. Right, that's. They're talking about prosecutions.

[Caller]

No, I'm just, I, I'm just saying to me that, you know, for, for them to come out and say that there is nothing to see here, guys, that is, that is, it's just beyond my belief.

[Buck Sexton]

They're saying, hold on. I think specificity, Ty, I think specifically matters. I think Clay and I agree with you more than maybe it has come across. I do not believe that, for example, allegedly Prince Andrew is the only other guy who got involved with one of the, one of the, you know, Epstein trafficked women. I do not believe that. Ok? I, I don't believe that, full stop. I do not believe that. I also don't believe that Epstein was not operating a blackmail operation. I do not believe that. Ok? But I don't believe that Bondi Bongino Cash have evidence of those things in their possession and they are suppressing that because of pressure on them. I mean, look, I've known Dan for 15 years. I've known Cash for certainly since the beginning of. So now about 10 years. Those guys would cut off their arm before they covered for somebody committing the kind of sex crimes. It just would not happen. It would not happen. So, you know, that's. I can just speak to you honestly, Ty, man to man, Dan and Cash are not sitting there going, yeah, it would look bad politically. So we're going to cover for these pedos. They, they, they would not do it. They would put their lives at risk before they would do it. So I promise you that is not. And people can get mad at me for this. That is not happening. That doesn't mean that the other things that I said did not happen previously. We have to Keep these thoughts in our mind. At the same time, I think there were more people who committed sex crimes, and I think there was blackmail going on. But the current FBI and the current doj, I do not believe has in their possession evidence of those crimes.

[Caller]

Then maybe, I think that's 100% messaging here. You know, maybe, maybe the messaging here, and particularly by Pam Bondi was terrible because, yes, Trump.

[Clay Travis]

Yes, we agree.

[Caller]

You know what? Trump actually campaigned on shining light on this Jeffrey Epstein situation. And you know, why did. Yes, because MAGA Nation. MAGA Nation understands that America suffers from a pedophilia problem and we suffer from a human sex trafficking problem. And Jeffrey Epstein was the poster child of. For everything that ills us in terms of that conversation. Trump ran on that, and for him to come out yesterday and just batted away, Guys, I don't know what it was. It's almost like you've listened to your child for, for 13 years, tell you the truth reflexively, and one day they lie to you and your, your, your, your street smarts just stands up and you know that they're being disingenuous because you have listened to them. You have come to be able to, you know, basically predict what they're going to do. Trump never turns his back on MAGA Nation. He knows better than that. And yesterday was the first time I've ever saw him do it.

[Buck Sexton]

Guys, it's a. I think it's a messaging mistake that has been made. I do not believe that. You know, people are. Look, Clay, let's just say people are saying that they flipped Trump. And I'm like, guys, the guy who. Can I just take a moment here? The guy who doesn't need this, who's the billionaire who, who took a bullet in the ear and said, fight. He got flipped on this. No way.

[Clay Travis]

No way. I think that's a crazy argument.

[Buck Sexton]

It's an insane. That doesn't mean. Again, like I said, I think there were more sex criminals. I think they've so far gotten away with it. I think there was a blackmail ring. But that doesn't mean that that evidence just sat around for 20 years and the FBI is now sitting on this trove of the evidence and going, we don't want people to know the truth. That's a different thing.

[Clay Travis]

I totally agree, and I actually agree with Ty also in that I think Pam Bondi did not do a good job with this. I think she created a mess. I think Trump has seen all the evidence and all the reports, and I. This is my honest address of Trump's comments yesterday. I think he's seen all the evidence. He knows that Jeffrey Epstein was a bad dude and a pedophile. But we're in the middle of the floods in Texas. We're in the middle of ICE agents trying to get murdered in. And I think he honestly believes that Epstein is old news and he wants to focus on the things that he can address. Now, whatever you think about Epstein, the guy's dead. The guy appears to have been an awful, disgusting pedophile and he's dead. And all the lawsuits have played out. Most of his money has been taken away and paid off to his victims. I don't see Epstein as someone who has dodged responsibility for his criminal culpability. There are other people. I agree with Buck. I think that it's highly unlikely that Prince Andrew was the only super rich, super famous person who was involved with the women that were being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein.

[Buck Sexton]

And also there's there's the, there's the things here. You've raised this too. I mean some of ep some of the women that Epstein was around and you know, were, were of, were of age. To be very clear, we're 19, we're 20. And so is, you know, is that now that's not criminal for anyone to be engaged unless there's some coercion that they're a part then, you know, so there's all this. But that evidence, it's been, you know, we're talking about some of this stuff happened 15, 20 years ago. Yes.

[Clay Travis]

And also I think you would speak to this. I think there was probably intelligence related asset using some of this was honeypot stuff.

[Buck Sexton]

And trust me, you're not going to leave that stuff around for the FBI to find in 20, in 2019. Look, I share your frustrations. I went on the Sean Ryan show two, three.

[Clay Travis]

Three years.

[Buck Sexton]

Two years ago. Three years ago now. And went in detail about how outraged I was about the FBI raid in 2019 in his house. And people thought what I was saying was so crazy, Clay, it couldn't be true. It was true.

[Clay Travis]

Yeah.

[Buck Sexton]

So, you know, we've been on this beat for a long time. But let's keep this in perspective. Let's not start to, you know, I do not question Trump, Dan Cash or Pam's integrity. I think Pam has made, I think the AG has made some errors in presentation and has misspoken about the way this has been presented in a few ways that's not been helpful and could.

[Clay Travis]

Even yesterday we didn't get much attention. We got to go to break. But the thousands and tens and tens of thousands. I thought that that was Epstein video. It's just stuff that he was downloading porn off of the Internet for people out there who are like, what about these victims? Yeah, I want them all caught. But it wasn't Epstein's videos. It was him just finding awful child porn stuff on the Internet. We'll close up shop next segment. Good call, Ty. I think raised a lot of points and questions that a lot of you have and that Buck and I have had as well. Look, Rapid Radio makes a huge difference. Walkie talkies, great communication insurance policy. When things can go wrong. They work and work nationwide, coast to coast. They're simple to use right out of the box. You got aging parents don't really use cell phones. Well, you got young kids and you don't want them to have a cell phone. How about teenagers that just use cell phones all too well and you want them to not be able to be on their cell phones as much. This can be great. Good vacation attribute. We've used them going to college football games. Rapid radio is great to use. In addition to the LTE coverage, they're 100% private. No contracts, no monthly fees. Get hooked up now@rapid radios.com 60% off up to free shipping from Michigan. And when you use the promo code radio, you get an extra 5% off. That's Code Radio. Order today. Rapid Radios.com Code Radio. That's Rapid Radios.com Code Radio. Keep up with the biggest political comeback in world history on the Team 47 podcast. Clay and Buck highlight Trump replays from the week, Sundays at noon Eastern. Find it on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Closing up shop here. A lot of great calls. Will continue to react. You can can get on the talkback. We'll play some of those for you as well. Appreciate all of the fun and spice and the excitement. One thing that I think is worth noting, every day feels like Christmas morning. Lots of great things happening inside of our government. We will talk about all of this and more tomorrow. Appreciate y'. All. Thursday should be fun.

[Buck Sexton]

This is an iHeart podcast.