Transcript
Allison Gill (0:00)
MSW Media. Hello and welcome to the Daily beans for Thursday, July 10, 2025. Today, there's another hearing in the Abrego case this morning after Jud ordered the government to produce at least one witness, any witness who knows what the hell is going on. Donald Trump tried and failed to use the 250 men in Seacoat that he claims to have no custody over as bargaining chips in a prisoner swap with Venezuela. Detainees in the Everglades concentration camp are subject to inhumane conditions, according to reports. Congressional Democrats are pushing for a new watchdog to babysit the president. The Supreme Court has denied Florida's emergency request to let it implement a law barring undocumented immigrants from entering the state. The IRS says churches can endorse political candidates and maintain their tax exempt status. Linda Yakarino has quit Twitter. And the Wisconsin Supreme Court clears the way to ban conversion therapy. I'm your host, Allison Gill. Hey, everybody. Welcome to the Daily Beans, the new show that gives you all the news that seems to be flying under the radar. It is Thursday, which means it's almost Friday, which means it's almost Monday. And you know what happens on Monday? Dana comes back. That's right. DG will be back in your ears. We have missed her, and I can't thank you enough again for sticking with me these past two weeks. I really appreciate it. We've got a ton of new listeners, too, so welcome. You'll all get to see, meet and hear Dana on Monday. I'm very excited for you. Later in the show, I'll be joined by the founder and CEO of Red Wine and Blue, Katie Paris. Just an amazing woman and an amazing conversation. I can't wait for you to hear it. I feel energized and inspired now, so I'm looking forward to that. And there will be a hearing this morning in the Abrego case. This is a follow up to the hearing Judge Sinis held a couple days ago. And the government couldn't answer her questions about their plans to detain and deport Mr. Abrego, specifically whether they were going to disappear him to a third country he's never been to, and which country that would be, or when. Or whether they're going to try to overturn the 2019 order issued by a judge here barring the government from sending him to El Salvador, which they mistakenly did, and now admit it was a mistake, even though they fired the guy who said it was a mistake, and that guy is now a protected whistleblower. Just a shit show. Now, Judge Sinis ordered The government to produce someone, anyone, with any knowledge of anything. No, any knowledge to testify under oath today. Any knowledge of the. You know, what their plans are. Because on one hand, the government is saying, no, you can't let him out because we want to try him for his crimes. And on the other hand, they're saying, oh, but you know, we're going to deport him. And then the other hand is saying, we really want to try him for his crimes. And nobody can come up with their plan. It's the government. What's your plan, bro? What you going to do? And since the lawyer, Ms. Ohickey, couldn't tell the judge, and by the way, the judge was like, you can't or you won't tell me what you plan to do with him. Since she didn't have any answers, the judge was like, well, get him and find someone and put them in this chair. Make them raise their right hand, testify under oath under penalty of perjury as to what's going to happen. And if I were a betting woman, I'd say that whomever they bring in, if they bring anyone, will either not have any more information or will cite some kind of bullshit privilege or foreign affairs, national security shit to avoid having to divulge their plans. Oh, it's state secret privilege. Or we have deference. The Supreme Court says we have deference in foreign affairs. Either that or they'll say they don't have to answer those questions because they've fulfilled their obligation to return Mr. Abrego to the United States, even though their obligation was to return him and put him in the same spot he was before they disappeared him to Seacote. There's two parts to that. Return him and put him in the same situation he was in before he left. And they haven't done that second part. So they keep arguing, well, we brought him back. Yeah. No, it's not the same. This is about due process. Anyway, I'll let you know tomorrow whether I'd have won that bet. Now, we all know that the reason the government said for months that it couldn't return Mr. Abrego to the United States was because they don't have constructive custody over the men at Seacoat. And, well, you know, it's. It's a sovereign nation. We can't tell Bukele what to do. Courts can't tell Bukele what to do. We don't have control or custody. We don't have custody over them. And we know that Bukele has told the United nations that the US does have total control and custody over these men. And that appeared in a court filing on Judge Boasberg's docket. That's the current case. To return all the men in Seacoat to the United States. Lead plaintiffs on that case include the gay stylist that was disappeared there, Andre Hernandez. But get this, the New York Times is reporting that the Trump administration's top diplomat, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, was actually overseeing a deal to free several Americans and dozens of political prisoners held in Venezuela in exchange for sending them the 250 Venezuelan migrants that the US had deported to El Salvador. But the deal never happened. Part of the reason Trump's envoy to Venezuela was working on his own deal, one with terms that Venezuela deemed more attractive. In exchange for American prisoners, he was offering to allow Chevron to continue its oil operations in Venezuela, a vital source of revenue for its authoritarian government. The discussions, which included the release of about 80 Venezuelan political prisoners and the two different deals, were described by two US officials and two other people who were familiar with the talks and sought anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the issue. The State Department never sealed the deal, though the top U.S. officials did not appear to be communicating with each other and ended up at cross purposes. The approximately 250 people expelled from the United States that are still being held in the maximum security prison in El Salvador, those folks are still there. And it became clear that while Trump's White House once said that it had no control over the detainees in El Salvador, it was willing to use them as bargaining chips. Both US Plans, one managed by Rubio, the other led by Rick Grinnell, involved speaking with the same Venezuelan representative, Jorge Rodriguez, the president of Venezuela's National Assembly. And that's according to one of the U.S. officials and two other people. The conflicting diplomatic efforts signaled a months long divide over how to approach Venezuela and resembled the chaos that permeated Mr. Trump's first term when competing officials vied for influence with the president. But the lack of coordination left Venezuelan officials unclear about who spoke for Trump, and ultimately they left both American and Venezuelan detainees imprisoned. The offer to swap Venezuelan migrants in El Salvador for prisoners remains on the table, according to one of the officials. And the White House is not willing for now to extend Chevron's license in Venezuela. Sounds like Rick Grinnell was promising some shit that he couldn't deliver. Grinnell declined an interview request by the Times, but in an email used a profanity to denounce the Times account of the separate deals as false. Rick Grinnell, Trump administration official Envoy to Venezuela told the New York Times to fuck off. A person close to Grinnell who's familiar with the talks with Venezuela said Grinnell did not believe that a swap involving the Venezuelan migrants was going to happen because he believed Mr. Trump would never have authorized the release of accused gang members. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity. Really? Trump would never approve the release of gang members. Really? So first of all, Trump does have the power to authorize their release. Good to know. And he wouldn't release accused gang members? Didn't he just give asylum to 17 members of the Sinaloa cartel? Didn't he just dismiss the charges against a bunch of Ms. 13 leaders? Didn't he just offer asylum and commute the prison sentence of a triple felon five times deported guy in exchange for his testimony against Abrego? He's not willing to release gang members or even alleged gang. That's the thing. Most of these men in sea code, not gang members. The United States is paying the Salvadoran government millions of dollars to detain migrants whom the Trump administration claims are all members of a Venezuelan gang trend Aragua and who it said had come to the United States to commit crimes. But the Trump administration has provided little proof that the men or gang members and their lawyers argue that their detentions are illegal and took place without due process. Supreme Court agreed 90 that they needed to be given meaningful due process. The negotiations over the prisoner swap, which were led by the State Department and John McNamara, the Charles d' Affaires of the US Embassy in Bogota, who also oversees Venezuelan affairs, had advanced to the point where in May, Venezuela was set to send a plane to El Salvador to retrieve the men. Oh, in May you say we could release the men in El Salvador in C code in May when Trump was arguing that they didn't have constructive custody. It's fascinating. All of this is coming out in court documents. We'll keep an eye on it for you. All right, we have a lot of news to get to today. We're going to take a quick break, though, so everybody stick around. We'll be right back with the hot notes after these messages. We'll be right back. Hey, everybody. Eating right? Sounds simple. But staying on top of what's healthy or not can become overwhelming. I can. I kept finding myself asking, is this actually good for me? And also sometimes I just forget to eat. I'm so busy. There's just too much conflicting information and I didn't know who to believe. And that's when I turned to Fay Nutrition. This Podcast is sponsored by Fay. You can go to feynutrition.com dailybeans to qualify to see a registered dietitian for as little as $0. Faye connects you one on one with a registered dietitian who builds a personalized plan based on your body's unique needs. This isn't some one size fits all approach. I spoke with my Fae nutritionist for like an hour on Zoom and we came up with a plan that, you know, because I never eat breakfast or lunch, so, you know, she's like, you should have some. So now I have a couple of eggs for breakfast with a little protein. And then she introduced me to cold pressed juices which give me a bunch of vitamins and nutrients and vegetables which I have around lunchtime. And so it's just, it's, it's again, not one size fits all. It's personalized. And the best part, Faye takes insurance. I always assumed nutrition counseling like this would cost me a fortune, but I paid $0. You can even check your coverage before you sign up, so you're not surprised. So whether you're looking to lose weight, manage conditions like pcos or diabetes, fill the gaps in your nutrition like me, or just feel better in your day to day life, Fay is an incredible resource. I'm proud to have them as a sponsor. They believe nutrition guidance should be affordable and accessible to all. And that's a message I can get behind. So if you're ready to stop guessing and start truly fueling your body for better health, take control with personalized nutrition support from a registered dietitian through Fay because you deserve to feel energized, healthy, and confident in your health choices. Having a personalized nutritionist used to cost big bucks, but not anymore. With Fay, listeners of the Daily Beans can qualify to see a registered dietitian for as little as $0 by visiting Feynutrition.com DailyBeans that's f a y Faynutrition.com DailyBeans One last time, head to Feynutrition.comDailyBeans and make sure you use our URL so they know we sent you. All right, everybody, welcome back. It's time for the hot notes. Hot notes. All right, first up from npr. In a break with decades of tradition, the IRS says it will allow houses of worship to endorse candidates for political office without losing their tax exempt status. The surprise announcement came in a court document filed on Monday. Since 1954, a provision in the tax code called the Johnson Amendment says that churches and other nonprofit organizations could lose their tax exempt status if they participate in or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. The National Religious Broadcasters and several churches sued the IRS over the rule, arguing that it infringes on their First Amendment rights to the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion. The IRS rarely enforced the rule. During President Trump's first term, he promised to get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution. Now, in Monday's court filing, the IRS didn't quite go that far, but it did say that when a house of worship in good faith speaks to its congregation through its customary channels of communication on matters of faith in connection with religious services concerning electoral politics, viewed through the lens of religious faith, it neither participates nor intervenes in a political campaign. Rather, the IRS compared religious institutions endorsements of candidates to a family discussion. My family's not tax exempt. Do people who have family discussions get tax exempt status? Now, is that a faith? Again, I think we need to start the Church of Democracy. Thus, communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted, unquote, state sanctioned religion. One of the whole fucking reasons we started our own country. And you know, taxation without representation. Oh, and no kings, but here we are taxed without representation kings. And apparently church and state are now married. All right, next up from cbs, Cuban reggaeton artist Liamsi La Figara, arrested last week in Miami Dade on assault charges, was transferred to South Florida's new immigration detention facility known as Alligator Alcatraz in the Everglades. And the singer confirmed this in a phone call. He and other detainees claimed they are enduring inhumane conditions at the site, including lack of access to water, inadequate food, and denial of religious rights. Now, the Everglades concentration camp was built in a matter of days on a rarely used municipal airport located about 50 miles west of Miami. The first group of detainees arrived at the center on 3 July, according to state Attorney General James Uthmeyer, who's been held in contempt of court. In a phone call from inside the facility, La Figuera described what he called horrific conditions. And if I'm pronouncing his name incorrectly, please send In a correction DailyBeansPod.com click on Contact quote We've been here at Alcatraz since Friday. There's over 400 people here. There's no water to take a bath. It's been four days since I've taken a bath, he said. He claimed the food at the immigration facility is scarce and unsanitary. They only brought me a meal once a day and it had maggots. They never turn off the lights for 24 hours. The mosquitoes are as big as elephants. Other detainees echoed his concerns, alleging violations of their basic rights. Quote, they're not respecting our human rights, one man said during the same call. We're human beings. We're not dogs. We're like rats in an experiment. I don't know their motive for doing this. It's a form of torture. A lot of us have our residency documents and we don't understand why we're here, he added. A third detainee, who said he's Colombian, described deteriorating mental health and lack of access to necessary medical care. I'm on the edge of losing my mind. I've gone three days without taking my medicine. It's impossible to sleep with this white light that's on all day. He also said his Bible was confiscated. They took the Bible I had and said here there is no right to religion, and my Bible is the one thing that keeps my faith. And now I'm losing my faith. On Tuesday, state officials responded to the allegations, saying they're completely false. Quote, the reporting on the conditions in the facility is completely false. The facility meets all required standards and is in good working order. That's what Stephanie Hartman, director of communications for the Florida Division of Emergency Management, said. That's the group that's funding this. All right, next up from the Times, Linda Yaccarino, the chief executive of Twitter and a top lieutenant to its owner, Elon Musk, said Wednesday she's leaving the company two years after joining the social media platform. In a post on Twitter, Ms. Yaccarino, who's 61, said, When Elon Musk and I first spoke for his vision for Twitter, I knew it would be the opportunity of a lifetime to carry out the extraordinary mission of this company. I'm immensely grateful to him for entrusting me. She did not provide a reason for her departure. Now her exit caps a tumultuous period at Twitter that has been remade in Musk's image, by the way, since he bought the platform for $44 billion in 2022. Since then, Musk has shed three quarters of the company's employees, loosened speech restrictions on the platform, and wielded it as a political megaphone. Advertisers were at one point spooked by the changes and the social media company's ad business tanked. In March, Musk said he sold Twitter, which is a privately held company, to Xai, his artificial intelligence startup, in an unusual arrangement that showed the financial maneuvering inside his business empire. The all stock deal, they don't have to pay, they don't have to pay taxes on unrealized gains made by stock, but they can use it as collateral to buy stuff. Billionaires are awful. The all stock deal valued Xai at 80 billion and Twitter at 33 billion, Mr. Musk said. Since then, Xai has been in talks to raise new financing that could value it as much as 120 billion, probably backed by stocks that haven't been taxed. Iaccarino had discussed her plans to leave Twitter with employees earlier in the week before the incident with Grok, according to three people. Now, Twitter and Xai are largely separate, but Grok's responses are often widely cited and criticized across the platform. Yeah, he's called himself Mecca Hitler. I'm sure her departure has nothing to do with that. By the way, Musk announced he was going to make changes to Grok, saying it was too woke and he was going to tell it to not be politically correct. And that's when Grok turned full Nazi. And then apparently some eagle eyed coder went in and found it, I guess just today, yesterday or today, that that language, that reprogramming, that bit that said you don't have to be politically correct has been removed. So we'll see if Mecca Hitler continues. All right, Next up from CBS. All right, this is, this is six years, seven years too late by 2018. I started tweeting back in 2018. Donald Trump started saying, oh, I'll be president forever. We need permanent presidents. And I started tweeting up a storm saying, no, we need a permanent special counsel. We need a permanent Mueller. Right. We need a permanent somebody to watch over the president regardless of who's sitting in the seat. I've been saying this forever, but now Senate Democrats are planning to introduce legislation to create a new watchdog to monitor the conduct and actions of President Trump's White House and future administrations. The bill, which will be formally announced Wednesday by a group of congressional Democrats, requires an inspector general to oversee the executive office of the president. That's not the best. When the inspector general is appointed by the president, I'm assuming there'll be something in the bill that says the president can't hire or fire this person. And maybe Congress chooses, I don't know. It requires an inspector general. The legislation has Been attempted previously, but now it has urgency. Quote, inspectors general conduct important independent oversight throughout different agencies in the executive branch. But the same is not true when it comes to the president and the White House, where there's no inspector general. That's what Adam Schiff said. As we know, Senator from California, who's sponsoring the bill. That should change regardless of who's in office. Schiff said an inspector general overseeing the White House and the staff would ensure that no president or administration is above the law. But, Senator Schiff, they are. They are above the law because of the Supreme Court. Now, I suppose you could have somebody in there that would monitor whether or not the president was violating the law through means that weren't official acts. But the Supreme Court has said they get to decide on a case by case basis what are official acts. So, I mean, it's nice. It's a nice thought, but I don't know how much if it has any teeth, given the makeup of this Supreme Court. Now. Ethics and watchdog groups have long advocated for an inspector general to monitor the White House. Rosa DiLauro, a Connecticut Democrat who's also sponsoring the legislation, has promised a similar bill. Well, she did promise a similar bill in 2017 during Mr. Trump's first term. Okay, all right. So that was before I started asking for one. Cool. I stand corrected. Dallaro said this is a vital check on executive power that's long overdue. Why didn't we do it before? I mean, it would need 60 votes in the Senate, and I'm sure no Republican would have voted for that, but maybe they would have during the Biden administration. I guess it kind of depends on who gets to pick who that watchdog is and who that watchdog reports to. You know, because I have four cats, and one of my cats is the police of all the other four cats, but they report to the cats. I have no control. I have no power there. So to have a president appoint a watchdog to watch himself, he'll put Emil Bovey's brother in there or whatever. I don't know if he has a brother, but you catch my drift. Congressional Democrats have criticized Trump for years over alleged conflicts between his business interests and his role as president, a charge the Trump administration has long denied, saying his assets are managed by his children. The bill faces long odds in a Republican controlled House and Senate, and Republican leadership is unlikely to bring the bill to a vote. DeLauer's 2017 bill didn't advance beyond the House Oversight Committee. And this latest Democratic effort to subject the White House to greater outside inspection and scrutiny is bound to be seen by this administration and its supporters as a partisan political move. That's why he should have done it under the Biden White House. And when we get that fucking White House back and we flip Congress, let's do it then when we're in charge. All right, some better news from the Guardian the US Supreme Court maintained on Wednesday a judicial block on the Republican crafted Florida law that makes it a crime for undocumented immigrants in the United States to enter the state. The justices denied a request by state officials to lift an order by The Florida based U.S. district Judge Kathleen Williams that barred the state from carrying out arrests and prosecutions under the law. While a legal challenge plays out in lower courts, Williams ruled that Florida's law conflicted with the federal government's authority over immigration policy. All right, good to know that some things can be relied upon that the federal government is in charge of immigration. Didn't really happen that way in the courts with the Biden administration, but I'm glad to see it here. So I guess my praise for reliability is kind of flawed since since it's not been real consistent. But regardless, I really hope that when any of these voting rights cases get up to the Supreme Court that the Supreme Court will recognize that the states administer elections, not the federal government. All right, here's some great news from tnr. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has cleared the way for a ban on LGBTQ conversion therapy, deciding that a Republican controlled legislative committee rule blocking bans on the practice was unconstitutional. The court ruled 4 to 3 on Tuesday that the powers granted to the Joint Committee for Review and Administration rules had violated the state Constitution. At the heart of the case brought by Governor Tony Evers was the committee's decision to block a 2020 rule by the state administration that listed conversion therapy, which is the practice of forcibly convincing LGBTQ people that they're straight, as unprofessional conduct. The committee decided the rule was arbitrary and capricious and failed to comply with legislative intent. Republicans, in support of the committee's decision, insisted that that the issue wasn't the conversion therapy policy, but whether the state licensing board had the authority to ban the practice. State Supreme Court decision effectively blasted a hole in the issue, stripping the committee of its ability to independently impede the executive branch and the decision will have long lasting implications for Wisconsin far beyond the scope of conversion therapy. The court's ruling has effectively upended several other attempts by the committee to block Evers agenda, including blocks on new environmental regulations, updates to Commercial building codes, vaccine requirements, and public health policy. All right, everybody, that's the news. Stick around for my chat with the CEO and founder of Red Wine and Blue, Katy Paris. And it's going to double as our good trouble today. You don't want to miss it. Stick around. We'll be right back. Hey, everybody. Welcome back. I'm really excited today because I have been following this group's work for so long and admiring it. And now I'm finally going to get to talk to the founder and CEO of Red Wine and Blue. Please welcome Katie Paris. Hi, Katie.
