Summary of "C&R - Cameos Killed the Sequel?" Episode of The Dan Patrick Show
Podcast Information:
- Title: The Dan Patrick Show
- Host/Author: iHeartPodcasts and Dan Patrick Podcast Network
- Episode: C&R - Cameos Killed the Sequel?
- Release Date: July 29, 2025
Introduction to the Discussion
[04:35 – 05:54]
In this episode, hosts Steve Covino and Rich Davis kick off their discussion by diving into the recently released sequel, "Happy Gilmore 2." They express initial skepticism about the film's heavy reliance on cameos, highlighting that the movie features an impressive 74 cameos. Steve remarks, “Was there a lot of cameos? Yes, 74 of them,” setting the stage for a critical yet entertaining analysis.
Impact of Cameos on the Sequel
[05:08 – 07:39]
Rich Davis shares his surprise at the number of cameos, admitting, “I actually approached this movie thinking I wasn't gonna like it. Like, ah, leave well enough alone. I'm not gonna like this. And I still laughed out loud” ([04:35]). Despite his reservations, he acknowledges that the frequent cameos added unexpected humor to the film.
Dan Beyer concurs with the critique, stating, “I believe that Spot had a point with the egregious number of cameos, some that didn't resonate” ([06:17]). He adds that while some cameos were entertaining, others felt out of place, particularly those featuring LPGA stars and lesser-known PGA Tour players.
Plot and Humor Evaluation
[07:39 – 10:32]
Steve Covino compares the plot elements to classic sports films, saying, “I thought it was entertaining” ([07:39]). Dan Beyer appreciates Vern Lundquist’s performance, noting, “I thought Vern Lundquist stole the show. I thought that Vern Lundquist was the best part of it” ([06:26]). He also finds humor in how the movie reflects the absurdities of the golf world, particularly parodying Liv Golf.
Iowa Sam offers a more critical perspective, pointing out issues with casting and excessive CGI. He remarks, “I think people who love it have the Happy Gilmore, Adam Sandler, Netflix, beer goggles on. Take them off. Watch this movie. It's not good. It's not bad” ([10:22]). Sam feels the film is “a sloppy mess” and lacks the ingenuity needed to stand out.
Nostalgia vs. Originality
[10:32 – 13:01]
The conversation shifts to the role of nostalgia in sequels. Steve Covino acknowledges that while nostalgia can draw in fans, it often leads to a lack of originality. Rich Davis compares the sequel to other nostalgic reboots, noting, “It's the same way where there's any sequel or spin-off or jump-off” ([13:01]). They debate whether relying heavily on past elements enhances or detracts from the movie's quality.
Dan Beyer adds, “I think this movie violated a big rule of comedy, is that it was too long, it was bloated” ([12:48]), suggesting that the overuse of nostalgic cameos made the film feel dragged out and unfocused.
Final Thoughts and Conclusions
[13:01 – 15:00]
Steve Covino wraps up the discussion by reiterating that if viewers manage their expectations, they might enjoy the sequel for its “dumb fun” ([09:01]). Rich Davis draws parallels to other film franchises, emphasizing that while sequels can succeed, they often struggle to capture the magic of the originals.
Iowa Sam maintains his critical stance, stating, “I found it to be boring and not funny” ([10:45]), but acknowledges that audience reception is varied. The hosts agree that “Happy Gilmore 2” serves its purpose for fans seeking a continuation filled with humor and cameos, even if it falls short for critics.
Notable Quotes with Timestamps
- Rich Davis [04:35]: “I thought Vern Lundquist stole the show. I thought that Vern Lundquist was the best part of it.”
- Iowa Sam [10:22]: “I think people who love it have the Happy Gilmore, Adam Sandler, Netflix, beer goggles on. Take them off.”
- Dan Beyer [06:17]: “I thought Vern Lundquist was the best. As a golf fan, I did find the plot somewhat humorous.”
- Steve Covino [09:01]: “I thought it was dumb fun. That's exactly what you'd expect from a Happy Gilmore sequel.”
- Iowa Sam [10:45]: “I found it to be boring and not funny.”
Conclusion
The "C&R - Cameos Killed the Sequel?" episode offers a balanced critique of "Happy Gilmore 2," weighing its humor and cameos against its lack of originality and over-reliance on nostalgia. While opinions among the hosts and guests vary, the consensus leans towards enjoying the sequel for its comedic value and entertainment, especially for fans of the original film. However, the film may not resonate as strongly with those seeking a fresh and innovative take.
This summary captures the key discussions, insights, and conclusions from the episode, incorporating notable quotes with timestamps and organizing the content into clear, structured sections for ease of understanding.