
The British government says it has found no evidence that formal security vetting or due diligence was carried out before Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was appointed as the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment in 2001. Newly...
Loading summary
A
During Memorial Day at Lowe's Shop household must haves for less. Save $80 on the Char Broil Performance Series 4 Burner Grill to chef up something special plus get up to 45% off select major appliances to keep things fresh. Our best lineup is here at Lowe's Lowe's we help you save valid through 527 while supplies last selection varies by location. See Lowes.com for details. Visit your nearby Lowes
B
what's up everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. The UK government has released documents relating to Prince Andrew and his time as the trade envoy. And as you would expect, we're learning that Prince Andrew was never formally vetted for the role of UK Trade envoy. And like everything else in his bitch ass life, it was handed to him. There is nothing I hate more than wasted privilege. This man had the whole world given to him and what did he do? Squandered it. And why? Because he needed more. Imagine being the Queen's son and that not being adequate. You need more. I. I have to have more. Always more, more, more, more like a glutton of debauchery. And it was great for Prince Andrew for years. Until it wasn't. And now that the bill is due, this man wants nothing to do with it. But the problem for Andrew is there's no escaping. Especially now. His problems were bad enough when he was being looked at in the United States, but now not only in the United States, but but his own country. So you know, the jeopardy for Prince Andrew grows by the day, especially when we see these documents that are being released and we come to find out that Andrew was never even vetted. Now, do you think that would have happened for anybody else or only for the Queen's darling boy? Today's article is from the Guardian and the headline no Evidence of Formal Security Vetting when Andrew Became UK Trade Envoy Minister says this article was authored by Amanda Topping. Formal security vetting and due diligence appears not to have been carried out before the appointment of Andrew, Mountat and Windsor as trade envoy. The government has said as it emerged that the late Queen was very keen for her son to take up a prominent role in promoting Britain's interests. And that's always been the case when it comes to Andrew. Mommy's darling little boy could do no wrong. And even with all of the evidence that was put before the Queen, she wasn't willing to hold him accountable. And that's why the monarchy is in jeopardy. I know everybody loves the Queen, but she really fumbled the ball when it comes to Prince Andrew. And the damage of that decision is long lasting. It's not going away anytime soon. And as more information comes out, the more damning it's going to be for the Royal family. The first batch of documents relating to the appointment of the former Prince as trade envoy by Tony Blair in 2001 includes a memo dated February 25, 2000, and address to Robin Cook, then the Foreign Secretary, in which the then chief executive of British Trade International, David Wright, said, queen Elizabeth II wish it had been for Mountbatten Windsor, then the Duke of York, to take on the role. So, because the Queen wanted it, it happened. But Andrew used that role allegedly to enrich himself and all the while he was on the taxpayer's dime. The government published historic documents concerning the appointment on Thursday in response to a parliamentary move by the Liberal Democrats and said it had found no evidence that formal due diligence or security vetting was carried out at the time, despite the role given Mountbatten Windsor access to senior government and business contacts around the world. Just being the Queen's son's good enough, huh? Well, that might be the case if the Queen's son wasn't an absolute moron, but I bet they wish they vetted him now, don't they? And I bet somebody wished they would have stepped in and told the Queen she's making a bad decision. We found no evidence that a formal due diligence or vetting process was undertaken. There's also no evidence that this was considered. Chris Bryant, a trade Minister, said in a written statement to Parliament, this is bad. And look, I'm telling you right now that we're just at the very start of the disaster for Prince Andrew. This is going to spiral. Because if you think that the allegations that have been made against Andrew when it comes to Epstein are the only ones, you're crazy. They might not all be about sex, but this dude was corrupt. According to everything we've heard, he never met a scumbag he didn't want to hang out with. And for all those years, he was protected by the Queen. But that ship is held and the Queen obviously is no longer around, so that protection is now gone as well. Brian said that it was understandable since the new appointment was a continuation of the Royal Family's involvement in trade and investment promotion work and because Mountbatten Windsor was replacing the Duke of Kent, who was stepping down from his role as Vice Chair of Overseas Trade Board. Sounds like an excuse to me. Everybody should be vetted. It doesn't matter who you are. And this is why. What, because you were born a Windsor. You're not capable of treason, you're not capable of evil. We know that's not the truth. So, yeah, he should have been vetted. But unfortunately they decided that they didn't have to do that. So with that decision, they now have to live with the consequences. And I think for the monarchy, that's going to be disastrous. There's nobody showing up that's going to save the monarchy, certainly not Charles. I mean, maybe William will be more liked, but do you really think he's going to have the effect the Queen did? I have a very hard time believing all that. The government's response, which includes the publication of of 11 documents that show how the role was created and Mountbatten Windsor was appointed, comes after the Liberal Democrats tabled the humble address and Parliament calling for publication of papers on his roll, including any vetting and any correspondence from Peter Mandelson, the disgraced former ambassador to the US in the February 2000 memo to Cook, Wright suggested Mountbatten Windsor's role would include some regional trips and two or three overseas visits each year, as well as leading trade missions from time to time. He wrote, finally, we would want the Duke of York to be available to receive prominent trade visitors from overseas here in London and perhaps act as a host at meals or receptions as appropriate. So basically, they just want Andrew there as a prop to say that the Queen's son is there. It's not like he was actually useful, not like he actually did anything. The senior official said that they did not envisage that the Duke of York would want to be burdened with the regularity of meetings of the Board of British Trade International or the burden of paper which goes along with the board membership. God forbid he has extra duties that would take away from his time of hanging out with Epstein. Can't have that, Kenny. We're talking about a guy who skipped his daughter's birthday to hang out with Epstein
A
during Memorial Day at Lowe's Shop Household must haves for less. Save $80 on a Char Broil Performance Series 4 Burner Grill to chef up something special plus get up to 45% off select major appliances to keep things fresh. Our best lineup is here at Lowe's. Lowe's we help you save valid through 527 while supplies last selection varies by location. See lowe's.com for details. Visit your nearby Lowe's.
B
The documents also show that Mountbatten Windsor's aide told the government that he preferred to go to sophisticated countries and to see ballet rather than theater on overseas visits. He should not be offered private golfing functions abroad, said the aide, as this was a private activity and if the then prince took his clubs with him, he would not play in any public sense. He probably stunk. Not that I should talk shit. I'm terrible at golf. I mean, absolutely terrible. I find it boring and I find it monotonous. But if you're somebody like Prince Andrew, golf is something that you have to do, right? How many deals have been made on the golf course? A whole hell of a lot. Mountbatten Windsor served as the UK's Special Representative WHO for International Trade and Investment from 2001 to 2011, an unpaid role in which he traveled the world, meeting senior business and government figures. Yeah, and enriching himself. Going down to New Mexico to hang out with Bill Richardson and Jeffrey Epstein down at Zorro Ranch. Hell of a guy, that Prince Andrew. And remember, he went down there in his official trade capacity, so anything he was doing while in New Mexico, he was doing as a representative of the British government, not just of the monarchy, but of the British people. And I have a funny feeling that people over in the UK are not going to take too kindly to it. They have had their fill in the UK of people like Andrew. The second son of the late Queen became the first royal family member to be arrested and Modern times. When he was held over claims of misconduct in public office. Emails appeared to show him sharing confidential information with a convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, while working as the trade representative. He has previously denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein. This is just the beginning for Andrew. And his problems are only going to grow because once they open the door and they start taking a look around your room, inevitably they're going to find your other secrets. And a man like Prince Andrew, if he has anything, it's secrets. Now, the only caveat to that is just how far the English authorities are going to dig. Are they going to cut him some slack because he's Andrew? Or are they going to make an example of him to show the world, and more importantly the people of the uk, that they mean business? At this point, I doubt that Andrew is gonna do any kind of time in prison, and not because the evidence isn't there, but because who he is. And the same goes for Mandelson. But we'll have to see what the authorities come up with. And we have to see just how sickened the UK populace ends up being, because I think that's going to drive the conversation if the people are demanding accountability in the UK when it comes to Andrew and Mandelson, maybe we'll get there. But if not, this investigation, like the investigation in America, will die on the vine. So we'll see what we see and like usual, we'll keep our ear to the ground. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
Host: Bobby Capucci
Date: May 22, 2026
This episode dives into recently released UK government documents that reveal Prince Andrew (formerly the Duke of York) was never formally vetted before becoming the UK’s Trade Envoy in 2001. Host Bobby Capucci examines the apparent lack of oversight in Andrew’s appointment, the broader implications for the British monarchy, and the deep connections between Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, and other elite circles. The main thrust: how unchecked privilege enabled Andrew's role, why this failure matters today, and what newly public documents say about institutional accountability.
[00:30 – 02:00]
[01:30 – 03:50]
[03:01 – 06:00]
[06:00 – 07:58]
[08:31 – 09:30]
Personal preferences of Andrew were highlighted in government communications: he preferred “sophisticated countries and to see ballet” on overseas visits and did not wish to partake in public golf while abroad.
The host uses these anecdotes to illustrate how the royal appointment prioritized Andrew’s comfort over trade goals.
[09:00 – end]
Bobby Capucci presents a scathing review of how unchecked privilege and royal favoritism allowed Prince Andrew to take on a sensitive government role with no vetting, setting the stage for scandal and diminished trust in the monarchy. The episode ties Andrew’s role to broader issues of elite impunity and public accountability, positioning newly released documents as only the beginning of deeper scrutiny—both for Andrew and the institution he represents. The host concludes with cautious pessimism about consequences, hinging future action on the British public's willingness to demand accountability.
For all related documents and episode materials, check the links in the description box.