Podcast
The Epstein Chronicles
Hosted by Bobby Capucci · EN
Jeffrey Epstein was a multi millionaire who had political and business ties to some of the most rich and powerful people in the world. From businessmen to politicians at the highest levels, Epstein broke bread with them all.
Yet for years the Legacy media and the rest of high society looked the other way and ignored his behavior as multiple women came forward with allegations of abuse.
Even after he was convicted and subsequently received a sweetheart deal those same so called elites welcomed him back with open arms.
Now after his death and the arrest of Maxwell, the real story is starting to come together and the curtain has begun to be drawn back and what it has revealed is truly disturbing.
From Princes to Ex Presidents, the cast of scoundrels in this play spans continents and political affiliations leaving us with a transcontinental criminal conspiracy possibly unlike any we have ever seen before.
In this podcast we will explore all of the levels of Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal enterprise.
From his most trusted assistants to obscure associates, we will leave no stone unturned as we swim through the muck searching for clarity and answers to some of the most pressing questions of the case.
From interviews with people directly involved in the case to daily updates, the Epstein Chronicles will have it all.
Just like our other project, The Jeffrey Epstein Show, you can expect no punches pulled and consistent content. We have covered the Epstein case daily(everyday since October 1st 2019) and will continue to do so until there are convictions. With a library of well over 1k shows, you can expect a ton of content coming your way including on scene reporting from the Maxwell trial and from places like Zorro Ranch.
Thank you for tuning in and I look forward to having you all along for the ride.
(Created and Hosted by Bobby Capucci)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Yet for years the Legacy media and the rest of high society looked the other way and ignored his behavior as multiple women came forward with allegations of abuse.
Even after he was convicted and subsequently received a sweetheart deal those same so called elites welcomed him back with open arms.
Now after his death and the arrest of Maxwell, the real story is starting to come together and the curtain has begun to be drawn back and what it has revealed is truly disturbing.
From Princes to Ex Presidents, the cast of scoundrels in this play spans continents and political affiliations leaving us with a transcontinental criminal conspiracy possibly unlike any we have ever seen before.
In this podcast we will explore all of the levels of Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal enterprise.
From his most trusted assistants to obscure associates, we will leave no stone unturned as we swim through the muck searching for clarity and answers to some of the most pressing questions of the case.
From interviews with people directly involved in the case to daily updates, the Epstein Chronicles will have it all.
Just like our other project, The Jeffrey Epstein Show, you can expect no punches pulled and consistent content. We have covered the Epstein case daily(everyday since October 1st 2019) and will continue to do so until there are convictions. With a library of well over 1k shows, you can expect a ton of content coming your way including on scene reporting from the Maxwell trial and from places like Zorro Ranch.
Thank you for tuning in and I look forward to having you all along for the ride.
(Created and Hosted by Bobby Capucci)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
664episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Epstein and the DEA: The Investigation You Never Heard About
Today00:17:18Summary readyNewly released documents from the Epstein Files Transparency Act trove reveal that Jeffrey Epstein was the subject of a previously undisclosed U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) investigation, according to a heavily redacted 2015 memo included in the government’s files. The 69-page memorandum, marked “law enforcement sensitive,” shows Epstein was one of 15 people targeted in a probe focused on “suspicious money transfers” that federal agents believed were tied to illicit drug trafficking and prostitution activities in both the U.S. Virgin Islands and New York City, raising questions about whether Epstein’s criminal conduct may have extended beyond his well-known sex trafficking offenses. The document, drafted after the DEA requested information from a multi-agency Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, suggests a significant investigation that spanned five years from 2010 to 2015, although many details and the identities of other targets remain redacted.The existence of this DEA inquiry adds a new dimension to the public understanding of Epstein’s activities and how thoroughly federal authorities were examining various aspects of his operations. While the later, better-known 2019 prosecution focused on sex trafficking and did not publicly include drug trafficking charges, the DEA memo indicates that investigators had been pursuing a potentially broader case years earlier. The revelations have prompted renewed scrutiny from lawmakers and law enforcement observers about what the newly released records might yet reveal about Epstein’s financial networks and whether narcotics trafficking played any role in his criminal enterprise.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Newly unearthed DEA document from Epstein files raises question: Did Epstein facilitate drug trafficking? - CBS NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummaryEpstein’s Berkeley Connection: Tuition Payments and a Recruitment Pipeline
Today00:14:05Summary readyCourt records and newly surfaced documents indicated that Jeffrey Epstein financed the tuition of a student attending the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. According to records reviewed in the report, Epstein paid roughly $26,000 in tuition for the law student. In return, the student allegedly helped recruit or refer young women to work for Epstein as “assistants,” a term widely used within Epstein’s network to describe women who often performed personal or administrative tasks around his operations. The arrangement appeared to mirror patterns seen in other parts of Epstein’s network, where financial support, gifts, or opportunities were provided in exchange for helping connect him with women.The report highlighted how Epstein leveraged money and influence to build relationships within elite institutions, including universities, where tuition payments and donations could open doors. Documents suggested that paying the Berkeley student’s tuition was part of a broader strategy in which Epstein used financial incentives to cultivate loyal intermediaries who could introduce him to potential recruits or associates. The revelations added to growing evidence from released files showing that Epstein repeatedly used his wealth and connections to gain access to young women while embedding himself within respected academic and professional environments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:‘Price to pay for Berkeley’: Jeffrey Epstein paid law student’s tuition in exchange for ‘assistants’ | National | dailycal.orgBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummaryThe Epstein Cover-Up Question: Congress Demands Answers From Pam Bondi
Today00:17:06Summary readyPam Bondi is facing escalating pressure from Congress after lawmakers voted to subpoena her to testify about the Justice Department’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. The controversy centers on the government’s rollout of records required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandated that the Justice Department release all documents connected to Epstein’s crimes and the investigations surrounding him. While millions of pages were eventually released, large portions of the material remain redacted or withheld, prompting accusations that the department failed to fully comply with the law. Members of Congress have expressed frustration that the document releases appeared disorganized and incomplete, fueling suspicion that key evidence or names tied to Epstein’s network may still be concealed.The subpoena reflects growing bipartisan anger over what lawmakers see as a lack of transparency in the government’s handling of the Epstein records. Critics argue that despite promises of openness, the public has received only a fragmented picture of the evidence surrounding Epstein and his associates. Questions remain about why certain records were withheld, how decisions about redactions were made, and whether the Justice Department deliberately slowed or limited the disclosures. The dispute has now turned into a major confrontation between Congress and the Justice Department, with lawmakers demanding direct answers from Bondi about whether the government truly fulfilled its obligation to release the full scope of the Epstein files.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Even Republicans have had enough of Bondi covering for Trump | OpinionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummaryThe Psychology Department At The MCC And Their Narrative About Epstein's Demise (Part 2) (5/25/26)
Yesterday00:16:21Summary readyThis is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York’s systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummaryThe Psychology Department At The MCC And Their Narrative About Epstein's Demise (Part 1) (5/25/26)
Yesterday00:14:54Summary readyThis is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York’s systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummaryJudge Throws Out Michael Wolff’s Preemptive Lawsuit Against Melania Trump (5/25/26)
Yesterday00:11:31Summary readyA federal judge dismissed Michael Wolff’s lawsuit against Melania Trump, rejecting his attempt to preemptively block or neutralize a potential $1 billion defamation suit from the first lady over comments tying her to Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that Wolff’s approach was procedurally improper, calling it a “contorted” effort and saying federal courts do not exist to referee a pre-lawsuit battle in that manner. Wolff had argued that Melania Trump’s legal threats were meant to intimidate critics and chill speech, while her lawyer said his statements caused reputational and financial harm and demanded retractions.The underlying dispute centers on Wolff’s comments about Melania Trump, Donald Trump, and Epstein’s social orbit, including remarks that were later used in a Daily Beast story the outlet retracted after legal pressure. Wolff maintains that his statements were either taken out of context, protected opinion, or did not accuse Melania Trump of criminal involvement in Epstein’s crimes. Melania Trump has forcefully denied any association with Epstein and framed the claims as defamatory lies. The judge did not decide whether Wolff defamed her; instead, she dismissed his preemptive lawsuit and left any future defamation fight to proceed through the ordinary legal process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge throws out Michael Wolff’s lawsuit against Melania TrumpBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummarySarah Kellen Names Three People During Her Appearance Before Congress (5/25/26)
Yesterday00:20:40Summary readySarah Kellen Vickers, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant and one of the women named in his 2007 non-prosecution agreement as a potential co-conspirator, reportedly told congressional investigators that she was not an accomplice in Epstein’s abuse operation but one of his victims. In closed-door testimony before the House Oversight Committee, Kellen denied helping Epstein traffic or abuse girls and instead described herself as someone who was sexually and psychologically abused by Epstein for more than a decade. She claimed Epstein manipulated, controlled, and “gaslit” her, and she pushed back against the long-standing public portrayal of her as a key operator inside his network. Her account attempts to recast her role from suspected facilitator to exploited subordinate, arguing that she lacked real power inside Epstein’s orbit and was trapped by dependence, coercion, and abuse.The testimony is significant because Kellen has long been treated as one of the most important unanswered figures in the Epstein case: she worked close to Epstein, was accused by victims of helping arrange encounters, and was shielded from federal prosecution by the controversial Florida deal that protected named and unnamed potential co-conspirators. According to the reporting, Kellen also gave investigators names of additional people allegedly connected to Epstein’s abuse network, which lawmakers described as a potentially important lead. But her testimony also creates a central tension for investigators and the public: whether Kellen’s claims of victimization explain her conduct, or whether they collide with years of allegations that she helped keep Epstein’s machinery running. Either way, her appearance before Congress puts one of Epstein’s most scrutinized former insiders back at the center of the investigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Here is who Epstein’s longtime assistant accused of sexual abuse | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummaryBritish Detectives Want Epstein Files — But Washington Holds the Keys (5/25/26)
Yesterday00:15:11Summary readyDetectives investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s links to Jeffrey Epstein are reportedly being slowed down by the U.S. Department of Justice, with British investigators still waiting on original Epstein-related documents they believe are necessary before they can make charging decisions. The investigation is said to involve questions about Andrew’s conduct during his years as a U.K. trade envoy, including whether sensitive or confidential material may have been passed to Epstein, as well as broader allegations of sexual misconduct and corruption. The central frustration, according to the reporting, is that British police may not be able to move the case toward a decision on charges until 2027 because key material remains in American hands.The story frames the delay as another example of the Epstein case being trapped inside institutional bottlenecks, where public pressure for answers keeps colliding with slow-moving legal processes, international evidence-sharing, and claims about what can or cannot be released. Andrew denies the allegations, but the investigation appears to have widened beyond one isolated claim and into a broader review of his relationship with Epstein, his official role, and whether that role creates a viable misconduct case under U.K. law. The result is a politically explosive limbo: British detectives are reportedly trying to build a case, but without the underlying DOJ material, they may be stuck waiting while one of the most high-profile Epstein-linked investigations drags into another year.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Andrew detectives probing his links with Jeffrey Epstein are being frustrated by US Department of Justice and won't be able to decide on charges before 2027 | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummaryMega Edition: Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 7-10) (5/24/26)
Yesterday00:51:50Summary readyIn her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
SummaryMega Edition: Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 4-6) (5/24/26)
Yesterday00:43:16Summary readyIn her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Summary