Ghislaine Maxwell And The Covid-19 Quarantine

Summary

---

The Epstein Chronicles

Episode: Ghislaine Maxwell And The Covid-19 Quarantine

Host: Bobby Capucci
Date: July 28, 2026

---

Episode Overview

This episode delves into the ongoing legal battle over the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular focus on Ghislaine Maxwell and the efforts by her legal team (and others named in the files) to delay public exposure. Host Bobby Capucci and co-host discuss the latest courtroom developments, frustrations with judicial process, media involvement, the critical role of investigative journalism, and mounting public pressure for transparency. The hosts examine the players hoping to keep the Epstein secrets hidden and articulate fierce advocacy for justice and accountability.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Courts' Refusal to Delay the Epstein Documents Case

• Segment Start: [01:30]
• The episode centers around a recent Courthouse News article covering U.S. District Judge Loretta Presca’s decision not to approve a month-long delay in the court battle over the release of sealed Epstein documents, despite the pandemic.
  • Co-Host:

    “We have to keep some semblance of the rule of law going... it's crucial that those documents are published for the public to see.” [01:39]

• The hosts are skeptical of defendants leveraging COVID-19 as an excuse for delays, characterizing such moves as foot-dragging by high-profile defense teams:
  • “It’s more dragging of the feet by the defense. Seems to me like it's more, 'let's try and pause this as long as possible and we’ll try and avoid the inevitable.'” [03:56 - 04:01]

2. The Ongoing Secrecy and Calls for Transparency

• Contextualized by: Requests from anonymous men named in sealed files for more time to object before their names are made public.
  • “You need more than 14 days to respond? Fourteen days should be plenty of time for you to get with your high profile lawyers and figure out a way to lie.” [05:04]
• The co-hosts highlight how “air of secrecy” and lack of transparency continue to foster public mistrust, especially when the stakes involve powerful and well-connected individuals.

3. Judicial Approach and Critique of Judge Presca

• Presca’s Ruling: Only records forming the basis of court rulings in Virginia Roberts’ lawsuit against Maxwell are presumed public, but she doesn’t close the case to further releases.
  • “She should just release all of these documents, be done with it, and move on with her life.” [07:48]
  • “Judge Presco should just come out swinging and release these documents because there's no reason not to release them. All right, who are you protecting and why?” [08:11]
• The hosts express frustration at perceived judicial hedging and continued protection of elites.

4. The Role of Investigative Journalism

• Julie K. Brown & Miami Herald:
  • The hosts praise Julie K. Brown’s Perversion of Justice series as instrumental in reopening the Epstein investigation, commending her courage and dogged determination—while also noting that others pursued the story earlier but lacked her reach.
    • “Julie K. Brown is certainly the one who got the door kicked in for this second time around. She deserves all the credit in the world.” [09:59]
    • “She really did the job of 15 investigative journalists. She was dealing with some very dangerous people and she was never deterred.” [11:07]
• The Herald remains “a thorn in the side of Epstein’s associates,” arguing fiercely for press—and therefore public—access to the records.

5. Debate over Public Notification & Maxwell’s Motives

• Maxwell’s legal team tried to soften notification wording to those named in the documents, a move perceived as trying to shield reputations and delay justice.
  • “If this stuff is public and these guys are outed, what does she have holding over their heads?... She is left with nothing. And she knows the only thing that's keeping her out of prison at this point are the dark secrets that she knows and the powerful people that she can, she can unmask.” [13:29 - 14:16]
• Judge Presca denies the request for softer language, reinforcing the potential release of these names.

6. The Power and Names Involved

• The co-hosts list some prominent individuals exposed in previous document releases: Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, Glenn Dubin, George Mitchell, and especially Prince Andrew.
  • “This man is an absolute black eye for the English people. An embarrassment to the royals. And that's saying a lot considering all the embarrassments they've had in their family.” [15:28]

7. Prince Andrew and Legal Ramifications

• The hosts update on Prince Andrew’s continued refusal to cooperate with U.S. authorities, referencing the disastrous BBC interview and potential consequences such as Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties or even an arrest warrant.
  • “An arrest warrant for Prince Andrew. That would be nice. I’d love to see that... The only way we can get there is if we do it correctly and go after the lieutenants first... then slam it right down on the Prince of punk asses, AKA the Prince of Lies, Prince Andrew.” [16:36]
• The hosts urge authorities to go after “the core four” first, implying close Maxwell/Epstein allies, to build an ironclad case.

8. A Call for Justice and Full Exposure

• The podcast closes with passionate advocacy for full public exposure of the Epstein network and strong support for the survivors.
  • “It's a tragedy that this has not been released already. This is something that concerns the whole entire nation and it is still being kept under wraps. We deserve to know who was involved with Jeffrey Epstein, and the survivors deserve to be vindicated by those people being put on blast as well.” [18:55]

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the necessity of transparency:

  “If they keep on keeping things in the shadows and away from the public, all they're going to do is foster more resentment and foster more mistrust in them being the Justice Department.” (Co-Host, [02:09])

• On Ghislaine Maxwell’s role:

  “Co-conspirator is the proper title to slap on Ghislaine Maxwell, in my opinion.” (Co-Host, [07:02])
  “When she eventually gets arrested, that'll be great. We could just identify her by that number then.” (Co-Host, [07:08])

• On the power of journalism:

  “Julie K. Brown’s a hero in this story, and her investigation into this case should win awards because she really did the job of 15 investigative journalists.” (Co-Host, [11:07])

• On elite protection:

  “Why are the rich and the powerful always protected by the justice system?” (Co-Host, [08:11])

• On Prince Andrew:

  “You're going big game hunting when you're going after Prince Andrew... slam it right down on the Prince of punk asses, AKA the Prince of Lies, Prince Andrew.” (Co-Host, [16:36])

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

| Segment | Description | Timestamp | |---------|-------------|-----------| | Ongoing Case Amidst COVID-19 | Introduction to the legal fight over Epstein documents, pandemic’s impact | [01:30] | | Defense Delay Tactics | Discussion of legal maneuvers to postpone unsealing | [03:54] | | Judge Presca’s Decision & Critique | Analysis of the judge’s “narrow” ruling | [07:31] | | Journalism’s Role (Julie Brown) | Saluting media in uncovering the Epstein affair | [09:14] | | Media’s Rights & Public Interest | Debate over media as surrogate for the public | [12:11] | | Maxwell’s Motives | Parsing Maxwell’s attempt to control info & blame | [13:29] | | Judge Denies Maxwell’s Wording | Legal rebuff of Maxwell’s notification change | [14:35] | | Major Names Mentioned | From Jean-Luc Brunel to Prince Andrew | [15:04] | | Prince Andrew Legal Update | Extradition and possible warrant scenarios | [15:59 - 16:36] | | Call for Mass Arrests & Transparency | Urging immediate full pursuit of justice | [16:31 - 18:55] |

---

Tone & Style Notes

• Direct, passionate, and informal: The hosts do not hold back criticism of the legal system or those seeking to block transparency.
• Candid, speculative, and engaging: Speculation about “anonymous men,” relentless calls for accountability, and irreverent pejoratives (“Prince of Lies”) exemplify the podcast’s commitment to straight talk and advocacy journalism.
• Focused: Conversation is detailed and content-rich, skipping tangents and returning repeatedly to the themes of transparency, power, and justice.

---

This summary provides a comprehensive outline of the episode’s main discussion points, notable quotes, and key moments. It is designed for engaged followers of the Epstein saga, survivors seeking justice, and anyone tracking the intersection of power and accountability.

Transcript

[NHTSA Public Service Announcer]

This morning, someone is walking their dog. Someone is crossing the street to their car. Someone's kid is riding a bike home. And they're counting on you to drive the speed limit. Speeding accounts for nearly 30% of traffic fatalities. And most of those crashes don't happen on the interstate. They happen on the streets where people live. Slow down. It's an act of care for the people around you. So remember, speeding catches up with you. Know the road and respect its limits. Presented by nhtsa. Now back to your news podcast.

[ZipRecruiter Advertiser 1]

Finding great candidates to hire can be like, well, trying to find a needle in a haystack. Sure, you can post your job to some job board, but then all you can do is hope the right person comes along. Which is why you should try ZipRecruiter for free at ZipRecruiter.com Zip ZipRecruiter doesn't depend on candidates finding you. It finds them for you. Its powerful technology identifies people with the right experience and actively invites them to apply to your job. You get qualified candidates fast. So while other companies might deliver a lot of hay, ZipRecruiter finds you what you're looking for. The needle in the Haystack.

[ZipRecruiter Advertiser 2]

See why 4 out of 5 employers who post a job on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire. And right now, you can try ZipRecruiter for free. That's right, free at ZipRecruiter.com zip. That's ZipRecruiter.com zip ZipRecruiter.com zip.

[Podcast Host]

Our article today is from CourthouseNews.com and the headline is Pandemic Won't Slow Fight

[Podcast Co-Host]

over Sealed Jeffrey Epstein Documents. Well, that's good. I'm glad to hear that. You know, I know that we're in the middle of the pandemic, and, you know, it's definitely a tough time for a lot of people, but we have to keep some semblance of the rule of law going, right? We have to make sure that the courts don't get backed up, and we have to make sure that they're processing as many cases as they possibly can. So it's good to know that this.

[Podcast Host]

That the pandemic isn't going to slow the fight over the sealed documents in

[Podcast Co-Host]

the Epstein case because it's crucial that those documents are published for the public to see. It's very crucial that that ends up happening because there's already the air of secrecy around this whole entire thing, the whole entire Shroud has been thrown over this case from the beginning. And if they keep on doing it and they, they keep on keeping things in the shadows and away from the public, they're all they're going to do is, is foster more resentment and foster more mistrust in them being the Justice Department. Because this is not, this is not the case, the kind of case where you can hold stuff back and say it's, you know, national security. There's no national security implications here. Unless of course, the CIA gets outed as being involved, then I guess that could be sort of a problem. But at the end of the day, that's not for the courts to decide. The courts need to just go after whatever they, whatever, whatever's on their plate, right. And they can't worry about all that other crap. So it's good to see that the courts are still processing this case right now throughout this pandemic. And it's going to be interesting to see how this all ends up.

[Podcast Host]

This article was written by Adam Klassfeld.

[Podcast Co-Host]

The federal judge who holds the key to secret records concerning the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein refused Tuesday afternoon to approve a month long delay in the case. Well, what would a month long delay do anyway? I mean, in about a month, another

[Podcast Host]

couple of weeks, three weeks, the, the

[Podcast Co-Host]

pandemic will be peaking. But even after it peaks, well, supposedly going to peak after it peaks, there's still going to be ripple effects being felt throughout not only the nation, but, you know, the court system, et cetera, et cetera.

[Podcast Host]

So I don't know what a month long delay would have even accomplished.

[Podcast Co-Host]

Seems to me like it's more dragging

[Podcast Host]

of the feet by the defense.

[Podcast Co-Host]

Seems to me like it's more, let's

[Podcast Host]

try and pause this as long as

[Podcast Co-Host]

possible and we'll try and you avoid the inevitable for as long as we can.

[Podcast Host]

Attorneys for people named in the secret batch of files sought the reprieve to extend how long they have to raise objections about public scrutiny after first receiving notice about their involvement.

[Podcast Co-Host]

So because of the pandemic, they'll use that as an excuse and they'll try and, you know, use that as a way to navigate through this minefield. And we see it all the time. And from these kind of people, from people like Epstein, the way that they jump through loopholes, the way that they avoid certain things within the justice system because they have high profile lawyers who know the tricks of the trade and

[Podcast Host]

we see it on a regular basis,

[Podcast Co-Host]

them trying to drag their feet and trying to draw out, make it A drawn out process

[Podcast Host]

at this point. 14 days is certainly adequate.

[Podcast Co-Host]

U.S. district Judge Loretta Presca told told

[Podcast Host]

an attorney for one of those anonymous men during a phone conference, referring to the length of time needed to respond to a notification.

[Podcast Co-Host]

I mean, you need more than 14 days to respond. Fourteen days should be plenty of time for you to get with your high profile lawyers and figure out a way to lie. Why do you need more than 14 days, Mr. Anonymous Man? And boy, we could go all day thinking about who the anonymous man is, right? There gotta be several of them. Definitely several of them. Maybe we'll talk about that at some point. Maybe we'll do like a speculative episode where we discuss who the anonymous men could be who are trying so hard to drag their feet here and trying

[Podcast Host]

so hard to delay the case. Like many U.S. court proceedings during the

[Podcast Co-Host]

coronavirus crisis, today's hearing took place in the form of a telephone conference. As proceedings began, the former Chief judge for the Southern District of New York quipped that many have been boosting their vitamin C reserves with. With quarantinists. I don't even know what that means. And why is she quipping anyway? Stick to the case, Judge Prescott. You're not there to be a comedian. Nobody finds you funny. Do the right thing and unseal these documents and save your comedic act for the night. The night crew.

[Podcast Host]

The 2nd Circuit put Prescott at the case's helm last July, long before the novel virus COVID 19 first erupted in China, spawning a global pandemic and national emergency. Her task is to review and potentially unseal files from a lawsuit that Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts brought against the now deceased pedophile's ex associate, Ghislaine Maxwell.

[Podcast Co-Host]

Ex associates. Better than madam, I guess, or better than socialite.

[Podcast Host]

But I'll take it a step further.

[Podcast Co-Host]

His co conspirator. That's what Ghislaine Maxwell is, folks. She's a co conspirator. She was just as involved in Jeffrey Epstein. She was just as involved. She might not have been abusing all of the girls, but she was involved in some of the abuse. She was certainly involved in the planning. She was certainly involved in the logistics.

[Podcast Host]

She was certainly involved in the grooming.

[Podcast Co-Host]

So co conspirator is the proper title to slap on Ghislaine Maxwell, in my opinion. Well, that and also when she gets her prisoner number, when she originally eventually gets arrested, that'll be great. We could just identify her by that number then. You want to talk about the biggest slap in the face if Maxwell ever gets arrested and she ever goes to jail for this, we will refer to her by her prison identification on this podcast, not by her name.

[Podcast Host]

Disclosure could prove limited. In January, Prescott ruled that only records that form the basis of court rulings in Robert's old lawsuit against Maxwell would be entitled to the presumption of public access. She emphasized, however, that her ruling would not end the case.

[Podcast Co-Host]

See, this is what's going on with Presca here. She's trying to. She's trying to toe the line on. On both sides. She should just release all of this, all of these documents, be done with it, and move on with her life.

[Podcast Host]

But instead, she says, well, you know, they're not all entitled to the presumption of public access. But this ruling, this doesn't end the case. So what she does is she leaves the door open.

[Podcast Co-Host]

For what reason? I don't know. I'm not a lawyer or a judge or anything like that, so I don't know the motivation behind something like this, but I think it's a bunch of BS if you want my op opinion on it. I think that Judge Prescott should just come out swinging and release these documents because there's no reason not to release them. All right, who are you protecting and why? Why are the rich and the powerful always protected by the justice system?

[Podcast Host]

The court is mindful of the fact that there is a great deal of public intrigue surrounding the unsealing of the documents at issue here. Presco wrote, with that in mind, this court emphasizes that this ruling is a

[Podcast Co-Host]

narrow one, and that's definitely a good thing. That's an opening in the case for these documents to be released. And she had said that previously. Right. That it's not ending the case. It's, you know, just.

[Podcast Host]

It just emphasizes that the ruling is a narrow one.

[Podcast Co-Host]

So it's up to interpretation, and her mind can be changed is what that means.

[Podcast Host]

Much of the public's interest in Epstein's case stems from the investigative journalism of the Miami Herald and its reporter Julie Brown, whose series Perversion of Justice spurred the resignation of Trump's former Secretary of Labor, Alexander Acosta.

[Podcast Co-Host]

Let's not get carried away, okay? I think Julie. Julie Brown's work was what initiated the whole reinvestigation.

[Podcast Host]

But I think that there was people

[Podcast Co-Host]

that were very interested in this case even before that. Now, they might not have had the resources of Julie Brown, and Julie Brown was the one who certainly kicked in the door. There were a bunch of people who were still covering this case. I mean, from the beginning, there are people that have been covering this case since, you know, 2007.

[Podcast Host]

So I think that.

[Podcast Co-Host]

I think that Julie Brown is certainly the one who got the door kicked in for this second time around. She deserves all the credit in the world. Her reporting was fantastic. The reporting of the Miami Herald was fantastic. And the way that she doggedly went after the case is just, just awesome. And she deserves a lot of. A lot of credit for that, because without her hard work, you know, the second time around, there had been zero chance that this case would have been reopened. Zero chance. So it's nice to see that Julie K. Brown is. Is charged, Charged so hard against this, against these people and took this case as seriously as she did and saw it through to an outcome such as Jeffrey Epstein getting arrested. It's pretty awesome work, and she. She should be commended for it. But there are other people who have been researching this case for a very long time as well. They just don't have the stature of Julie K. Brown.

[Podcast Host]

The paper's reporting also reanimated civil litigation from the convicted pedophiles survivors and has been credited for Epstein's federal sex trafficking indictment, whose investigation has outlived its key defendant.

[Podcast Co-Host]

Yeah, hey, look, like I just said, she definitely deserves all the credit in the world for that. Julie K. Brown's a hero in this story, and her investigation into this case should win awards because she really did the job of 15 investigative journalists. And she was dealing with some very dangerous people. And she was never deterred. She just kept going and kept pounding and kept grinding. And that's exactly the sort of thing you need to do if you're going to chase down people like Jeffrey Epstein.

[Podcast Host]

A little more than an hour before today's telephone conference, the Herald signaled it would remain a thorn in the side of Epstein's associates in a memo giving Maxwell's legal team a lesson in press freedom. Ms. Maxwell's attack on the Herald and Brown's reporting on this case of significant public interest is wholly unwarranted. And her positions demonstrate her interest in, and continues to hide from public scrutiny

[Podcast Co-Host]

that which has already been sealed for far too long, the paper's attorney, Christine Walls, wrote.

[Podcast Host]

She further fundamentally mischaracterized the role of

[Podcast Co-Host]

the media in seeking access to court records. The media are not distinguishable from the public. They are the surrogates for the public. And that's for sure.

[Podcast Host]

The media, the Fourth Estate's real job is to expose stuff like this.

[Podcast Co-Host]

The media's real job is to let

[Podcast Host]

the public know that there's corruption going on.

[Podcast Co-Host]

The media's job isn't to play sides. The media's job isn't to have a political bent. The media's job isn't to tell you what to think. The media's job is to report the facts and then you are to form your own opinions. And especially the media's job, or a content creator's job or a reporter's job is the most important thing is that you don't become the story. And there seems to be a lot

[Podcast Host]

of people who want to be the

[Podcast Co-Host]

story in this case. And thankfully Julie Brown and some of these other reporters that have been working doggedly for the Miami Herald have not done that. It's always been about the survivors and justice for the survivors. And that's definitely respectable in my opinion. I think Julie K. Brown deserves a lot of credit for the way she went about this.

[Podcast Host]

Highlighting the potential for further press scrutiny with Walls took umbrage during today's phone

[Podcast Co-Host]

conference with Maxwell's bid to have the

[Podcast Host]

language of the notifications emphasize the consequence of the information becoming public.

[Podcast Co-Host]

Yeah, look, Maxwell doesn't want this stuff out there, doesn't want it to become public because that's one less bullet in her chamber. If this stuff is public and these guys are outed, what does she have holding over their heads? How can she blackmail them? How can she, you know, force them into doing what she wants them to do? If this all becomes public, she loses all the ammunition from her gun. And then what? What is she left with? Nothing. She is left with nothing. And she knows the only thing that's keeping her out of prison at this point are the dark secrets that she knows and the powerful people that she can, she can unmask inside of this entire, this whole, entire criminal enterprise. And that's what they're scared of. And if they take that away from

[Podcast Host]

her, if they take that away from

[Podcast Co-Host]

her, she will have nothing left. And the self preservation that we see her involved in for so long will soon be gone and she will have no choice but to be questioned by the FBI at that point. Judge Presco agreed.

[Podcast Host]

The semantic change Maxwell proposed does sound

[Podcast Co-Host]

terribly scary and was not needed as the notifications already state that the files would become publicly available. Accordingly, the proposed language is denied. Prescott said, well, that's good. A denial to Ghislaine Maxwell's team. A denial to Ghislaine Maxwell and her attempts to keep things quiet and to keep these names sealed.

[Podcast Host]

It's always nice when you see her

[Podcast Co-Host]

and her team get a slap in

[Podcast Host]

the face when the 2nd Circuit unsealed the initial tranche of files in August. Their release turned up public scrutiny on model scout Jean Luc Brunel, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, financier pedophile Glenn Dubin, and former Senator George Mitchell, to name a few. Another of these individuals, Britain's Prince Andrew, has been dogged by controversy ever since. Oh, as he well should.

[Podcast Co-Host]

As he well should. This man is an absolute black eye for the English people. An embarrassment to the royals. And that's saying a lot considering all the embarrassments that they've had in their family.

[Podcast Host]

And for this guy to still run

[Podcast Co-Host]

around and act like he hasn't done anything and to thumb his. His nose at the rest of us by hiring this legal team and hiding behind them after saying he was going to talk to the authorities.

[Podcast Host]

It just goes to show you the

[Podcast Co-Host]

kind of person that Andrew is.

[Podcast Host]

Andrew, who is Queen Elizabeth's second son, is still reeling from a public relations disaster that transpired with a BBC interview in November. Federal prosecutors in New York disclosed earlier this month that the prince completely shut the door on voluntary cooperation forming the U.S. forcing the U.S. attorney's office to weigh other options. Former prosecutors for the district say those measures could include everything from a request under the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty, or mlat, to an arrest warrant.

[Podcast Co-Host]

Well, that's a.

[Podcast Host]

That's pretty horror strong. A pretty strong statement, huh?

[Podcast Co-Host]

An arrest warrant for Prince Andrew. That would be nice. I'd love to see that. I don't know if we'll, we'll get to that point anytime soon, but I'd love to see it. In my opinion, the only way we can get there is if we do the. Do it correctly and go after the lieutenants first. Round them all up, have them all start ratting on each other. Build the case against Prince Andrew that's so ironclad that they can't deny the request. Then present the evidence to the English authorities and have them get on board. That's pretty much the only way we're ever going to get Andrew wrapped up in this, especially if there's an arrest warrant. It's gonna have to be an ironclad case. But the other ones, the core four, look, they're right here in America. They're right here for Berman to go after. And they're not going to be protected by that immunity deal, according to the sdny. So what are you guys waiting for? Go get the core four, Start the interrogations. Have them all start singing like little songbirds. And then mass arrests. I am talking mass arrests. Everybody that was involved all the employees who covered forum, the, the. The pilots who covered for him. Everybody who does not cooperate gets arrested. Everybody gets hit with RICO charges. Everybody is have getting in fear of having all of their finances seized by the federal government. That should be what's going on right now. Now, Prince Andrew is certainly that. You're going big game hunting when you're going after Prince Andrew. And there's no doubt you want to put that feather in your cap and you want to bring him to justice. But I think the proper course is to go after the core four in Ghislaine first. Get them caught up, get them wrapped up, get them singing, get them ratting, and then build that ironclad case that nobody can pick apart and then slam it right down on the Prince of punk asses, AKA the Prince of Lies, Prince Andrew. Hopefully we get some more movement in this case soon. Hopefully Prescott does the right thing and releases the materials that should be released. And hopefully the lawyers for Virginia can continue to battle tooth and nail to get this stuff released for the. For public consumption. It's a tragedy that this has not been released already. This is something that concerns the whole entire nation and it is still being kept under wraps. We, we deserve to know who was involved with Jeffrey Epstein, and the survivors deserve to be vindicated by those people being put on blast as well. All right, folks, if you'd like to contact me, you can do that@bobby capuchirotonmail.com that's B O B B Y C A P U C c I.

[NHTSA Public Service Announcer]

@protonmail.com you can this morning, someone is walking their dog. Someone is crossing the street to their car. Someone's kid is riding a bike home. And they're counting on you to drive the speed limit. Speeding accounts for nearly 30% of traffic fatalities. And most of those crashes don't happen on the interstate. They happen on the streets where people live. Slow down. It's an act of care for the people around you. So remember, speeding catches up with you. Know the road and respect its limits. Presented by nhtsa. Now back to your news podcast.

[ZipRecruiter Advertiser 1]

Finding great candidates to hire can be like, well, trying to find a needle in a haystack. Sure, you can post your job to some job board, but then all you can do is hope the right person comes along. Which is why you should try ZipRecruiter for free at ZipRecruiter.com Zip ZipRecruiter doesn't depend on candidates finding you. It finds them for. For you. Its powerful technology identifies people with the right experience and actively invites them to apply to your job, you get qualified candidates fast. So while other companies might deliver a lot of hay, ZipRecruiter finds you what you're looking for. The needle in the Haystack.

[ZipRecruiter Advertiser 2]

See why? 4 out of 5 employers who post a job on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. ZipRecruiter the smartest way to hire. And right now, you can try ZipRecruiter for free. That's right, free at ZipRecruiter.com Zip that's ZipRecruiter.com Zip ZipRecruiter.com Zip.