
Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...
Loading summary
Bretzky
What's up baby? It's Bretzky. And I'm here to tell you that spinquest.com is giving out free sweeps coins. All you gotta do is purchase a ten dollar coin pack and guess what? They're gonna give you the coins from a thirty dollar coin pack that lets you play all your favorite games like Blackjack, Wanted, Dead or Wild. And we're talking real cash prizes, baby. Spinquest.com Spin Quest is a free to
SpinQuest Announcer
play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
Podcast Host / Investigator
Boss, what's the most dreaded question that you can get when you tell people you host a podcast called the Lapsed Fan? Ugh. It's what is it about? And why is that do you think? Because to like pro wrestling is to lose the respect of others. Now what if we told you there's a podcast that explains exactly why that is and why it's kind of deserved. For over a decade we've taken fact finding missions through the thicket of half truths that is wrestling history. We watch old matches, call out carnies, laugh at our own jokes, and have so much fun doing it that some people actually can't handle it. Think wrestling is an escape from real life? Think again. Same power games, same office politics, same people lying to your face. Just with entrance music and absolutely no company health insurance under any circumstances. All I offer is opportunity, not benefits. As do we, Vince. The Lapsed Fan Podcast. Come for the wrestling history. Stay for the uncomfortable truth about why it used to be better and why you still care.
SpinQuest Announcer
What's up everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to dive right back in to the interview by MCC's former warden with the OIG inspectors question. Now what about in this case, whereas you actually weren't working that day, should they have called you? Yeah, whoever was the acting warden question that would make the determination. She would have made the determination. Who was the acting warden that day? Do you know? I don't know if I left redacted or redacted as the acting question. One of those two. It would be one of those two and it wouldn't be the redacted answer. No, he's the executive assistant question. Now what's the difference between like an executive assistant and an A W answer? The Associate Warden is GS14 and the executive assistant is a 13 question. Okay, so they're not. He gets cut off by the warden. No question. But what is the executive assistant just mainly to assist you in your functions Answer. He assists in the functions. I had also given him some other departments to monitor. Question Mm. Answer so they manage also those other apartments. And now one of the other investigators jumps in and asks a question of the warden. I just got a question. I don't know if you may be asked him about the backup list. Was there a backup list of names? Answer for Question I think we did talk about it, but if Reyes, he gets cut off. When we talked about it, if Reyes was removed because the institution always has people coming and going so frequently. Was there like a list that was set in place that we would now consider these people or would it be just a whole new he gets cut off by the warden? No, because we would have to base it on who was there. Question okay. Answer because of the turnover in the unit. Question all right, now we're going to get into counts. So this is an email sent from you to Mr. Redacted. It's the count slip four. It was sent on Saturday, August 10, 2019 at 5:11pm this shows the A is the shoe correct Answer Right. Question so this says at a 10 it shows that the count for ZA was 73 signed by Michael Thomas and Ms. Noel. Answer yeah. Question and it says that the count was done, it looks like at 12:01am and then we get to the next one and that's at 3am it goes down to 72. At 5am there is 72. And here is the count, the institutional count. It shows 72. And at what time 12:00am or no, this one is 3:00am I don't know why this is all out of order. 5:00am so at 12 this says 72. Answer I think that was just an attachment to the email that you sent. Question so but as you know, as you notice, one of them said so the count slip said 73412 over the institutional count. And as you see here, 4:12am it said 72. And to that, Mr. Hayes, the lawyer for the warden, jumps in. By the institution, you mean the shoe. Question no, the institution, the warden. It means the hole question. MCC does account and it's the official count question. The shoe these counts slips are supposed to be actually, you can answer my question. What's supposed to be the difference between what happens with the count slip and what happens with the institutional count? So I'm not answering your question. Answer so what happens is on the shift you call the count and the different units call in the count to control center. Question and how do they get that count number Answer from counting. They have to go around and count. Question Physically counting an inmate, you have to physically count the bodies. Question and then they take the total amount of inmates and they call that into the control center. They call it into the control center. Question and where does the control center get their numbers from? This is what's called an E1, which is a print out of the number of inmates in each unit. Question Right. Answer so if in an instance, for example, we look at the BA unit, so they're supposed to be 26 in there. If somebody calls it in there, they say it says 25, they tell me it's a bad count, so they have to go back and count again. Question so the E1 is created based upon what inmates are listed within your system? Answer Right. Question the count slips are based upon how many inmates they actually count. Answer what they count. Question and the purpose of that is what? Why are the inmates counting inmates and why are they providing that number to control? Answer so we make sure every inmate is in the institution. Question the accountability of the inmates. Correct? Answer yes. Question Great. So does that answer your question, the other investigator? Yep. Question so the next email is sent about one hour later at 6:13pm on August 10th. It says, why did the count change from 73 to 72 12am to 3am Answer huh. Question do you remember what your response was to that? Answer I do not. Question and then this one is another one from redacted to yourself. It says the 12am count slip reads 73 and the 12am says 72. So those kind of go together. Do you remember what your findings were there? Answer I don't remember because typically what happens on the count you are supposed to. The lieutenant is supposed to take one count at night and then review documentation. So I don't know what happened with the discrepancy. His lawyer jumps in. Mr. Hayes, I mean, this isn't really what's relevant because we noted Epstein was there. Question no, it's relevant for our investigation. All right. So if you don't mind just initialing and dating that and then we can explain to you why that's all relevant. So you don't though recall. You don't find out what actually happened? Answer I don't recall what the response is I gave. Question no. And do you remember looking into it at all? Answer when was that sent? Question that was sent the day of. The day of Epstein, that that he was found? Answer I don't because it was just too much going on that I can't really remember how I responded to them that day. Question do you remember learning anything about the accuracy or inaccuracy of the counts on the 9th and 10th? Answer what do you mean the accuracy and inaccuracy? Question like if the counts were actually accurate or not? Question I don't recall that. Answer you don't recall finding out about that? Answer no. Question did you recall did you find out if the shoe counts and rounds were not conducted by the shoe on August 9th or 10th, 2019 by the shoe staff? Answer if they did rounds or not? Question Correct. Did you find out if the shoe staff had conducted both 30 minute rounds as well as the institution counts on August 9th and 10th? Answer I don't know if it was after the fact that I was told that the officer did make the rounds and and I don't recall if it was they put it in the logbook and they made rounds, but that in all actuality it wasn't done. Question okay. Answer so that might have been something that came up afterwards. Question but you're not super, you know this, you don't really know what happened or didn't happen. Answer that day because I mean it happened that weekend. Everything was moving and then by Monday everything else had changed. Question Right. So but on the 10th or the 11th you didn't hear anything Answer I didn't hear anything about or recall anything about that. Question but had you heard that they didn't at least conduct some of their rounds and counts? Answer that they didn't? Question that they did not. Answer I don't want to use the word that. It was just, you know, an assumption, you know, like because one of them had asked them to come up and speak with but it was Thomas and he wouldn't come up. Question and this was on the 10th in the morning. Answer this was on the 10th when we got him because I wanted to speak with him because people were telling me he was distraught. So I wanted to make sure he was all right, you know, and he just, he didn't want to come up and talk. Question what are your thoughts of Thomas as an employee? Answer I've known Thomas a couple years. I never had any issues with them. You know, it was any, you know, like any other employee, you do something, I correct you on the spot and that's it. But I have never encountered him do anything, known him not to count, do his job, you know. Question what about Ms. Tova Noel? Answer she was new, so she had just gotten there. You know, she got the same spiel from me that everybody else does. You know, you're new, you can't do the things that somebody at 20 has 20 years in, they're not doing their job. You shouldn't be following it. Question and did you actually speak with her about that? Answer oh I do that in my indiscernible class when they first come in. Question okay, so that's something you would have said to everybody. Answer oh, I said it clear as day. The same thing I would say in my art class annual refresher training. Question because this is one of her excuses saying that 20 year guys, I'm following them, they're not doing it so I'm not doing it. Is that something you clearly entrust to her? Answer so here's my speech, my spiel I use to tell people I said go ahead, follow that 20 year guy and you're on probation, guess what happens, he might get some time in the street, you're getting fired. Answer and you're confident that Ms. Noel have heard that speech from you? Answer she heard that speech from me. Question okay. Answer yeah, I'm confident that's the speech I give everybody. Same thing in the art. Question okay, good enough. All right, so this is going to go back. This is just a little list that I wrote of exactly what happened and then I'll read it to you and I just want just for our purposes I'm going to show you and and you can refer to them on this one at first going to be the count on the 9th that was conducted is this 4pm is this 4pm or 5pm here? 4pm 4pm count there just signed off. Yeah, it's five. Sorry, 5 o'. Clock. 12 12. 3 and 5 answer no, no, this is afternoon Question yes. So this is Friday, so 3 and 5. So these are basically the time period in question everywhere from 4pm through the 5am count the next day on August 9th and 10th. Answer okay, question here are the lieutenant logs and these are the emails. Again I'm going just to go over these because so I'm not pulling things out of thin air, I'm here with
Bretzky
spinquest where you can play and win from the comfort of your own home with hundreds of slot games and all of the table games you love with real cash prizes. Right now $30 coin packs are on sale for $10 for new users. It's all@spinquest.com that's S-P-I-N Q U-S-T.com Spin
SpinQuest Announcer
Quest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details. The emails that we were able to obtain so this was from redacted who was the ops lieutenant at the time and during the morning watch. So this one was sent from her on Saturday, August 10, 2019 at 9:26am it says there are the August 10, 2019 daily activity report and then we got the daily lieutenant's log here. So where would this this is just out of order. This should have been first. So Friday, August 9, 2019 should she sends one at so first I want to ask this question. So on Friday, August 9, 2019, she sends one at 5:11 and Saturday she sends one at 9:26am and on Sunday, August 11, 2019 she sends it at 6:15am now reviewing all of the lieutenant logs that come out prior to that time, they're all sent out pretty much between 5 and 6am by all the various ops lieutenants. Do you find it odd that she didn't send this one out until 9:26am being that I know Epstein was found at 6:33am but typically they were sent out much earlier than that. Is that I know she sent it out after the incident and after, you know, everything happened. But do you think it's weird that she sent that one out at 9:26am versus prior to that 6:33am when her shift ends at 6:00am Answer I mean she was relieved at 5:30am by lieutenant redacted. Answer that's what I'm saying. She wasn't when I got there. Lieutenant Redacted was lieutenant Question Correct Answer who contacted me regarding he gets cut off by the investigator. She was supposed to be gone at 5:30am Answer by the warden so yeah, I don't know if she left at 5:30am or whatever. I don't know how they indiscernible. Question well, that's when she was relieved. She didn't leave until after this was sent at 9:26am Answer I don't recall her being in the institution around then. Question After Epstein was found, she actually went into the shoe she helped with feeding and then she went back and she did some things on the computer and she sent it Answer I thought redacted relieved her and she Left. Question at 5:30am she was relieved. She stuck around because she said she had work to do. After Epstein was found, she came to the shoe and assisted Redacted who was working in the shoe but was there because he was the com tech guy and at the time Thomas was gone, Noel was there but at some point Noel left. Answer and I'm looking at this, but I was under the impression when Redacted had told me he had relieved her and she left. Question so do you find that odd then, that she was still there until at least 9:30am? Answer yeah, I. I didn't. Yeah. Question this is the first time that you're hearing of this? Answer yeah, because when I was told she was gone. So unless, I mean, I mean, he relieved her. So I guess technically when you relieve somebody, then it becomes your issue. So I was talking to Lieutenant Redacted, but I didn't want, you know, I assumed that she was the one that. But I heard that she left. I didn't know she came back. Question she allegedly did not come back. She allegedly was there the entire time. Answer so then that is kind of odd because usually your log is completed before you leave. Question Right. Answer on your log. You'll write on there, I'm relieved by such and such. Question so is that suspicious to you at all? Answer Kind of, yeah. But I'm curious as to why you didn't lock it down or something. All right, folks, we're gonna wrap up right here and in the next episode, we're gonna pick up where we left off. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
Bretzky
What's up, baby? It's Bretzky, and I'm here to tell you that spinquest.com is giving out free sweeps coins. All you got to do is is purchase a $10 coin pack. And guess what? They're going to give you the coins from a $30 coin pack that lets you play all your favorite games like Blackjack, Wanted, Dead or Wild. And we're talking real cash prizes, baby. Spinquest.com Spinquest is a free to play
SpinQuest Announcer
social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
Episode: Inside The OIG Interview: The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 10)
Host: Bobby Capucci
Date: April 12, 2026
In this episode, Bobby Capucci delves into the official Office of Inspector General (OIG) interview with the former warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) regarding the circumstances and timeline of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The conversation focuses on key questions about staffing, inmate counts, and protocol compliance in the Special Housing Unit (SHU), with particular scrutiny on communication breakdowns and procedural lapses during the hours and days surrounding Epstein’s death.
The host walks through portions of the OIG interview transcript where the warden is asked about who was technically in charge the day Epstein died, as he himself was not on duty.
The warden is unclear whether the acting warden was [name redacted] or [name redacted], highlighting administrative ambiguity (01:39).
“She would have made the determination. Who was the acting warden that day? Do you know?”
— OIG Investigator & Warden (01:40)
Explanation of roles: Associate Warden vs. Executive Assistant, with details about their responsibilities and departmental oversight (02:04).
The investigators probe whether there was a pre-existing backup list for staffing.
The warden admits there was not a reliable, static backup list due to high turnover (02:45).
“No, because we would have to base it on who was there... because of the turnover in the unit.”
— Warden (02:54)
Much of the episode explores the confusion regarding institutional counts vs. unit counts, highlighting changes in reported inmate totals between 12:01 AM, 3:00 AM, and subsequent counts the morning Epstein was found dead (03:10–07:00).
Clarification on count slips (unit-level) vs. institutional count (facility-wide), and how accountability is supposed to work:
“They have to go around and count... physically counting an inmate, you have to physically count the bodies.”
— Warden (04:00)
“The count slips are based upon how many inmates they actually count.”
— Warden (04:36)
Investigators press the warden about the purpose of these counts, emphasizing the need for accountability (05:00–05:25).
The OIG questions contradictions between email reports and actual counts, as well as the warden’s recollection about whether these differences were investigated and resolved (06:13–07:45).
The warden cannot recall specific responses to email queries from that night, indicating disorganization and possible oversight:
“I don’t recall what the response is I gave... it was just too much going on that I can’t really remember...”
— Warden (07:43)
The investigators specifically ask whether SHU staff performed both 30-minute rounds and institutional counts as required (08:10–09:17).
There’s an admission that, although logs may have been filled, rounds “in all actuality... wasn’t done,” and the warden appears uncertain as to what truly happened:
“I don’t recall if it was they put it in the logbook and they made rounds, but that in all actuality it wasn’t done.”
— Warden (08:38)
The OIG asks the warden about Officers Thomas and Tova Noel, both central to events of that night:
“You’re new, you can’t do the things that somebody at 20 has 20 years in... you’re getting fired.”
— Warden (11:49)
Bobby guides listeners through a comparison of the actual logs and email records before and after Epstein’s death, noting unusual timing and inconsistencies (12:00–14:45).
Most notably, a shift lieutenant sent the daily activity report later than normal (9:26 AM instead of the typical 5–6 AM), raising suspicions:
“Do you find it odd that she didn’t send this one out until 9:26am... when her shift ends at 6:00am?”
— Investigator (14:10)
“That is kind of odd because usually your log is completed before you leave.”
— Warden (15:15)
The warden confesses this is the first he’s hearing about the delay and the possibility the lieutenant stayed past her shift (15:22–16:10).
On Turnover and Protocol Confusion:
“No, because we would have to base it on who was there... because of the turnover in the unit.”
— Warden (02:54)
On Accountability:
“You’re new, you can’t do the things that somebody at 20 has 20 years in... you’re getting fired.”
— Warden, paraphrasing his onboarding warning to new staff (11:49)
On Suspicious Delays:
“That is kind of odd because usually your log is completed before you leave.”
— Warden (15:15)
On Breakdown in Communication:
“I don’t recall what the response is I gave... it was just too much going on that I can’t really remember...”
— Warden (07:43)
This episode offers a granular, moment-by-moment examination of the MCC’s protocols and personnel on the night of Epstein’s death. Through the warden’s often halting testimony, Capucci exposes gaps in memory, procedure, and communication, laying bare the systemic disorganization that fuels ongoing controversy around the Epstein case. Listeners are left with a sense of unresolved questions and institutional ambiguity, setting up deeper investigations in subsequent episodes.