
Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...
Loading summary
SpinQuest Advertiser
Forget whatever plans you have this weekend because you're staying at home and playing on spinquest. And there's never been a better time to sign up than right now. New users get $30 coin packs for just $10. All the table games you love, with hundreds of slot games and real cash Prizes. That's at spinquest.com S P I N
SpinQuest Disclaimer
Q U-E-S-T.com Spinquest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're picking up where we left off with the warden from MCC and his interview with the OIG inspectors. Question now, is that you know all staff that was in there or is it like really the warden cuts him off? And again, you probably have to speak to the captain who was responsible for doing the checks and doing the count. Question and so would the captain have some responsibility on this too? Answer well, did the captain, he's in charge of correctional services, so that's the unit he is over. Question okay. Answer so he has overall responsibility to make sure, you know, in conjunction with the lieutenant, that the unit is running the way it's supposed to run. Question and what should have the captain done in order to make sure that that was accurate? Answer well, now there's different ways of finding out if stuff is accurate. Like you have the perpetual audit system where they're responsible, the lieutenants are responsible to conduct perpetual audits. So you can find out through those when you do it. And they are usually quarterly. But if there is a discrepancy and things are going on in that Department of Correctional Services, we have what we call perpetual audits, which he maintained the records of. And that is another check and balance where you would find out if something is wrong. Question and how often are those done? Answer those are done quarterly question Quarterly Answer yeah. Question all right, so the fact that this we are Talking about like 10 or 11 days, there's a good chance that they weren't done during this time period. Or do you know when they would have been done? Are they done like on a certain date? Answer what the quarterly? Question yeah. Answer I don't know when the dates of the quarter starts, but that is your checks and balance. You know, you do your perpetual audit and then you catch it and you say, oh wow, we did an audit and this is wrong. And then you come up with a corrective action to fix it. Question so that's how the captain could have Determined, I guess. But how, in those 10 or 11 days, how would that have been caught? Answer again. You would have to see your Inmate Accountability Board. You know, you're a matching sentry if you're pulling off sentry and matching it with what is on the board. Question, but. And I apologize that I'm beating a dead horse here. But, like, who does that? Answer again, I don't know who. You know, who the lieutenant assigned it to. Who? The oic. You know, everybody has different duties and different ways they work. Question. So it's not like. Not like Morning Watch does this. Or it's just based upon. Passed down from lieutenants to the OIC or to whoever. Answer Right, like what to. No, but basically when you decide to do it, you know, I mean, I can't see on the midnight shift, you're doing an accountability check like that because the guys are sleeping and, you know, you're looking for a living, breathing body, but you can't physically see them, you know, so that shift was picked to check and say, okay, let's make sure our cell. The accountability in the cell. So I can't. I can't really speak. He gets cut off by the investigator. Sure, that's fine. All right, let's get this stuff out of the way, if you don't mind. And again, we have comments from the peanut gallery. Mr. Hayes, am I right that we're getting close to the bottom of the pile? Question we are. We're getting close, Hayes, because Jesus Christ, I can't take this question. We are indiscernible with this question. So this is the email with all the rounds and the shoe assignment, and these were separate. Hayes, again with another question. Now let me ask the indiscernible. The supervisors, your job is the prison. It's your job to look down into the prison as far as these counts and, you know, accountability boards and so forth. Answer no. I mean, that's what you have the captain for and the lieutenant for, you know. Question. And then we touched on this before, but this is an email that the captain sent to you regarding the lieutenant rounds on 8, 9 and 8 10. He sent them. He sent this email on August 11, 2019. He said, Warden, here are the lieutenant rounds for 8, 9 and 8 10. Below are the workstations logged onto complete rounds. But again, for you, a lieutenant round. And I don't know if we ever came to that conclusion or that we may have got off topic on that, but a lieutenant round is used primarily to check, and it's not necessarily to Go down. But the different ranges answer on the midnight shift. So they typically not, you know, unless they have an issue. But like you said, you as a lieutenant can walk, should walk around and see now the midnight shift is hard but the other shifts you, you know, walk around, see what's going on. Question. Alright, so should they though be walking down the ranges on both the morning or the day watch and the night watch, evening watch? This is what I will say. You probably gotta look at the post orders and see the post orders. Question yeah, the post orders aren't clear with that. We haven't, we haven't been able to specifically he gets cut off by the warden. It's not, that's what I mean, it's not a requirement. Okay, yes, you know, for the indiscernible they're in there making rounds, checking the books to see if you got a problem on the range, you would call that. But most lieutenants do, you know, just walk the range just to see what's going on. Question. Because most lieutenants that we talked to said that they were absolutely required to do around. Just like the shoe staff member was to do around some lieutenants, specifically lieutenants that work that day said nope, there is no requirement to do that. So that's where I'm at as the warden. He gets cut off by the warden. Well no. The expectation is like you hit any unit, you make your rounds within the unit. The shoe unit is no different. That you say hey, I'm going to go in there, make sure everything is, you know, check on the inmates and make sure they're fine. But if we're talking about the post orders where they required to the post, you know, the post orders I don't believe had the requirement that they have to, you know, physically go in indiscernible. Question so does that, if I understand you correctly, the expectation was that they conduct around just like a shoe staff member, but there is no requirement to do so. Answer yeah, you should be walking around. Question all right, but it's not like you told them, you gave them a directive, make sure you're doing this. Answer no Question. So there is no. So if someone wasn't doing it, it's not like something they would be disciplined for. Answer C. That's hard. I mean you say discipline, there is a difference between what is written down and what you need to be doing. I mean if you're coming in and I enter there as a supervisor, I want to see what's going around the unit. I might ask the officers, alright, do we have any problems, the inmates, when you come on, hey, they know the lieutenant's on, hey, Lieutenant, I need to talk to you. So you're going down the ranges, you know, so when you are going down the range, you're seeing something, you get to another range. The inmate said, hey, I need to talk to you. So it's something that you should be doing as part of your rounds and going up into the shoe, just walking around, make sure that everything he gets cut off by the investigator. But if you're still the warden of the MCC and found out that your lieutenants, when they were signing off on doing rounds and you found out that they were only checking in with the staff members and they were not actually walking down the ranges, is that something that you would find problematic? Answer I would correct it. Question and when you say correct it, what do you mean by that?
SpinQuest Advertiser
You know what? It sucks to be bored. But when I get on my phone and play real casino games on spinquest.com, so the time flies by, that two hour wait at the DMV seems like 10 minutes. Play your favorite slots, live blackjack, live craps with a live dealer. New players, $30 coin packs are on sale for 10 bucks. Play spinquest.com and you'll never be bored again.
SpinQuest Disclaimer
Spin Quest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
Answer I would tell, you know, get with the captain and I would tell the captain they need to be, you know, if you in inmate grounds, they need to walk the ranges. Question. So they should be walking the ranges then answer off of the post orders. It's not in there, you know, any place saying that you have to do it but as a supervisor that like any unit you walk on, you want to see what's going on in the unit. So do I want to use the word sound correctional judgment, you know, just to see as a supervisor what's going on. I mean you have some people that go above and beyond and then do their job and you have some people that want to do the barest minimum. But that's something from a rounds point of view, I would say you need to make those rounds. Hayes jumps in again. Okay, let me ask you a question. You do the rounds. Does that mean literally walk up and down this what we, what would I call it, the cell block? Answer yeah, you walk around the unit, you know, you're interacting with inmates, you're talking to the inmates. Same thing with the inmates and shoe, you know, you're walking around, hey, what's going on? Question. So what you are not familiar with is the way the shoe is set up? Answer Right. Question there's different levels and there's different hallways. Hayes, know what I remember about the shoe cold? Question. Yeah. So like if you were just, you can simply go in and go to the officer's station and check in with the staff and say everything good? You got all your paperwork in order. All your paperwork is actually right here on the desk. Did you find it problematic that they're keeping all of their round sheets on the desk versus on the ranges themselves? Answer different places do it different ways. Some places have it, they keep it at the end of the ranges and you sign it. Some have it right there. The log, you know, take the log book and they just sign it. He gets cut off by the investigator. So the individuals, the OPS lieutenants and activities lieutenant that we spoke to that worked on August 9th and 10th, a majority of them said, if not all of them, no, no, no. All I needed to do was go to that officer station, check in with my officers, make make sure their paperwork is done and then I left. Every other lieutenant that we talked to said no. When you sign that paper, you're signing it just like you conducted around, as if the shoe staff conducted around. You had to go down every range, make sure everything was good to go. You're not just checking on. So what we're trying to say is which one is right? Answer. Well, now for the ones that are saying that I don't have to go down and check every range, they're going off the post office. The ones that are doing their job, they're going around and checking every time making sure that the well being of the inmate and you're checking on the well being of your staff. Question. All right, so it kind of sounds like nobody is right and nobody is wrong. They need to change the post orders. Answer well, they would. They should have their post orders, but. But they should be going around for the wellness check. Question. Okay, so no one technically did anything wrong. They should just really do it. Answer they should, they should just do it. Question okay, fair enough. All right, we're going to wrap up right here. And in the next episode, dealing with the topic, we're going to pick up where we left off. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
SpinQuest Advertiser
You know what? It sucks to be bored. But when I get on my phone and play real casino games on spinquest.com the time flies by. That two hour wait at the DMV seems like 10 minutes. Play your favorite slots, live blackjack, live craps with a live dealer. New players 30 coin packs are on sale for 10 bucks. Play spinquest.com and you'll never be bored again.
SpinQuest Disclaimer
Spin Quest is a free to play social casino void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
Episode Title: Inside The OIG Interview: The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 14)
Host: Bobby Capucci
Date: April 14, 2026
In this episode, host Bobby Capucci continues his deep dive into the Warden’s official interview with the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). This segment focuses on systemic issues of inmate accountability, the chain of command, and ambiguity around staff responsibilities—crucial factors in understanding what went wrong, and who (if anyone) should be held responsible. The host and investigators scrutinize the breakdowns in procedures that may have allowed Epstein’s death to happen undetected.
The interview delves into who was responsible for inmate counts and checks within the MCC.
The Warden defers much of the operational responsibility to the Captain and Lieutenants of Correctional Services, describing a structure where duties are often delegated and the details get passed down.
“So he [the captain] has overall responsibility to make sure, you know, in conjunction with the lieutenant, that the unit is running the way it's supposed to run.” (00:44)
Perpetual audit systems and inmate accountability boards are mentioned as “checks and balances” but are only conducted quarterly, leaving significant windows between audits.
“You have the perpetual audit system…lieutenants are responsible to conduct perpetual audits…usually quarterly.” (01:22)
Investigators press the Warden on who should have caught any discrepancies during the 10–11 day period around Epstein’s death. The Warden repeatedly answers that it’s unclear exactly who was tasked with daily checks, as responsibilities fluctuate between officers, lieutenants, and the OIC (Officer in Charge).
“Everybody has different duties and different ways they work.” (03:00)
Discussion reveals no strict protocol for who matches sentry data to the inmate accountability board on a daily basis, especially during certain shifts.
Shift duties—specifically the midnight shift—are cited as challenging for visual checks:
“I can't see on the midnight shift, you're doing an accountability check like that because the guys are sleeping and, you know, you're looking for a living, breathing body, but you can't physically see them…” (03:20)
Investigators question what’s required of lieutenants making rounds: Are they supposed to physically walk the ranges (the actual cell blocks), or is checking in with staff at the officer’s station sufficient?
The Warden’s answers reveal a culture of unwritten “expectation” without formal directive:
“The expectation is like you hit any unit, you make your rounds within the unit…But if we're talking about the post orders…I don't believe had the requirement that they have to, you know, physically go in…” (06:25)
The Warden admits that, while doing physical checks is expected as good correctional judgment, there’s nothing explicitly requiring it in the post orders. Thus, not doing so is not technically a disciplinary issue:
“There's a difference between what is written down and what you need to be doing.” (07:32)
When pressed on whether this gap is problematic, the Warden states:
“I would tell, you know, get with the captain and I would tell the captain they need to be, you know, if you're in inmate rounds, they need to walk the ranges…as a supervisor like any unit you walk on, you want to see what's going on in the unit.” (09:18)
The OIG team notes that some lieutenants claimed checking in with staff sufficed, while others stated walking every range was required. The Warden reluctantly agrees that both interpretations exist due to vague post orders.
Ultimately, the recommendation is to revise the post orders for clarity:
“So it kind of sounds like nobody is right and nobody is wrong. They need to change the post orders.” (11:25)
“Well, they would. They should have their post orders, but they should be going around for the wellness check.” (11:29)
On Audit Systems:
“You do your perpetual audit and then you catch it and you say, oh wow, we did an audit and this is wrong. And then you come up with a corrective action to fix it.” (01:41)
On Practicalities of Rounds:
“Most lieutenants do, you know, just walk the range just to see what's going on.” (05:41)
On Accountability for Not Walking the Ranges:
“That's hard. I mean you say discipline, there is a difference between what is written down and what you need to be doing.” (07:32)
On Staff Minimalism:
“You have some people that go above and beyond and then do their job and you have some people that want to do the barest minimum.” (10:00)
On the Need for Change:
“They need to change the post orders.” (11:25)
The exchange captures the pervasive ambiguity and bureaucratic loopholes typical in high-security environments, particularly when accountability is fragmented. The warden is pragmatic, at times defensive; the investigators are persistent, often frustrated with the “nobody is right and nobody is wrong” reality. The overall mood is tense and exasperated—mirroring the confusion and lack of clear authority that underpinned the Epstein case management.
This episode illustrates a culture of ambiguous oversight and unclear written protocols at MCC during Epstein’s incarceration. Key decision-makers relied on expectations rather than explicit orders, leaving daily practices inconsistent and accountability diffuse—critical gaps that persist in the ongoing quest for answers about Epstein’s death.
Next Episode Preview:
The investigation continues as Bobby Capucci takes listeners further into the OIG’s interviews and dissects additional evidence from the night of Epstein’s death. For supporting documents and links, see the episode description.